Tandem 1,2-sulfur migration and (aza)-Diels–Alder reaction of β-thio-α-diazoimines: rhodium catalyzed synthesis of (fused)-polyhydropyridines, and cyclohexenes

Abstract

Rhodium catalyzed synthesis of substituted tetrahydropyridines was accomplished from readily accessible thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles. The reaction involves tandem rhodium catalyzed 1,2-sulfur migration in β-thio-α-diazoimines, generated from thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles, to thio-substituted 1-azadiene and subsequent self aza-Diels–Alder reaction. Interestingly, the methodology was effectively extended to the synthesis of fused tetrahydropyridines, dihydropyridines and cyclohexenes through the in situ trapping of the intermediate, 1-azadiene, with various dienophiles such as enol ether, enamine, ketene S,S-acetal, alkyne, alkene and diene. Furthermore, the direct conversion of propargyl sulfides to (fused)-tetrahydropyridines was also achieved through the successful integration of copper and rhodium catalysts in one-pot.

---

Introduction

1,2-Migration of atoms or groups is one of the fundamental reactions in organic synthesis. Particularly, 1,2-sulfur migration in various 1,2-functionalized thio-derivatives is an important tool for the construction of sulfur-containing building blocks and heterocycles.¹ For example, rhodium catalyzed 1,2-sulfur migrations in α-thio carbenes were documented for the synthesis of α-thio-α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds² and 3-alkoxycarbonyl β-lactam derivatives from β-thio-α-diazo carbonyl compounds.³ Although 1,2-sulfur migrations in α-thio metalcarbenes have been reported, they are rather limited to only β-thio-α-diazo carbonyl compounds.

In the past few years, the use of readily accessible N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles⁴ as a source of α-diazoimines has been greatly exploited in organic synthesis as a vital reactive intermediate.⁵ Unlike traditional α-oxo metal carbenoids, metal carbenoids generated from α-diazoimines possess both an electrophilic carbon atom and nucleophilic nitrogen atom, which allows interesting inter/intramolecular reactions with various functional groups, like nitriles,⁶ alkynes,⁷ alkenes,⁸ enol ethers⁹/enamines,¹⁰ carbonyl compounds,¹¹ cumulenes,¹² C–H,¹³ X–H¹⁴ and C–X¹⁵ bonds and other carbene induced transformations to functionalized carbo(hetero)cycles¹⁶ and heteroatom-based building blocks.¹⁷ Interestingly, 1,2-hydride or alkyl migrations onto the electrophilic carbenoid carbon of α-imino metalcarbenes were also reported.¹⁸ Our contribution in this interesting field includes [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement with aryl allyl sulfides,^15a chemo- and regioselective insertion into the para C–H bond of aniline derivatives^13c and transannulation with enol ethers.^9b Based on our continuous interest in the functionalization of N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles and potential 1,2-sulfur rearrangement, we envisioned rhodium catalyzed 1,2-sulfur migration in β-thio-α-diazoimines, generated from suitably substituted thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles, for the synthesis of thio-substituted 1-azadienes (Scheme 1).¹⁹

Scheme 1 Rhodium catalyzed tandem 1,2-sulfur migration and aza-Diels–Alder reaction of β-thio-α-diazoimines derived from N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles.

Thio-substituted 1-azadienes are potential building blocks for the synthesis of various polyhydropyridines²⁰via (aza)-Diels–Alder reaction²¹ (Scheme 1). These substituted polyhydropyridines are the most common heterocyclic scaffolds encountered in naturally occurring bioactive compounds and pharmaceutical drugs (Fig. 1).²² In addition, they are also exploited as vital intermediates for the construction of piperidine and pyridine derivatives and organic hydride donors in biomimetic asymmetric transfer hydrogenation reactions.²³ Hence, development of new strategies to access these important scaffolds is of continued interest in contemporary organic and medicinal chemistry. We herein disclose the rhodium catalyzed synthesis of substituted polyhydropyridines from readily accessible thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles via tandem 1,2-sulfur migration and (aza)-Diels–Alder reaction.

Fig. 1 Representative examples of commercialized polyhydropyridine and pyridine derivatives.

Results and discussion

To test our hypothesis, we synthesized thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazole 1a from phenyl propargyl sulfide and tosyl azide under CuAAC conditions^4a,4b and 1a was used as a suitable model substrate. The initial reaction of 1a with 2 mol% of rhodium acetate at 75 °C in CHCl₃ for 5 h directly afforded the tetrahydropyridine 3a in 43% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The structure of 3a was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray analysis (Fig. 2).²⁴ The formation of 3a can be explained through the initial rhodium catalyzed 1,2-sulfur migration in β-thio-α-diazoimines to 2a followed by the concomitant self aza-Diels–Alder reaction of 2a.

Table 1 Rhodium catalyzed synthesis of tetrahydropyridine 3a from N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazole 1a^a

Entry	Rh(II) (2 mol%)	Solvent	Temp. (°C)	Yield^b (%)
a Reaction conditions: triazole 1a (0.15 mmol), Rh(II) (2 mol%), solvent (1 mL), temp., 5 h. b All are isolated yield of 3a. c 3 h.
1	Rh2(OAc)4	CHCl3	75	43
2	Rh2(OAc)4	CHCl3	90	55
3	Rh2(OAc)4	Toluene	90	80
4	Rh2(OAc)4	1,2-DCE	90	94
5	Rh2(Oct)4	1,2-DCE	90	85
6	Rh2(DOSP)4	1,2-DCE	90	93
7	Rh2(TBSP)4	1,2-DCE	90	94
8	Rh2(OAc)4	1,2-DCE	90	83^c

---

Fig. 2 ORTEP diagram of compound 3a. The thermal ellipsoids are set at 30% probability.

To improve the reaction conditions, various critical parameters were examined. Increasing the temperature to 90 °C gave 3a in 55% yield (Table 1, entry 2). A drastic increase in the yield to 80 and 94% was observed while changing the solvents to toluene and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE), respectively, at 90 °C (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). Shortening the reaction time to 3 h led to a slight decrease in the yield (Table 1, entry 8). Similar results were observed with other rhodium based catalysts such as Rh₂(Oct)₄, Rh₂(DOSP)₄ and Rh₂(TBSP)₄ (Table 1, entries 5–7). Based on these studies, we chose the following reaction conditions for studying the scope and limitations of the present reaction: 2 mol% of Rh₂(OAc)₄ in 1,2-DCE at 90 °C.‡

After identifying the best reaction conditions, the scope and limitations of various thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles 1 were examined. An initial change at the aryl moiety of the sulfonyl group did not show any influence on the outcome of the reaction and facilitated the formation of corresponding tetrahydropyridines (3a–3e) in comparable yields (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2 Rhodium catalyzed synthesis of tetrahydropyridines 3: scope and limitations. ^†10 h.

Subsequently, the effect of substitution on the thio-side chain was investigated (Scheme 2). The presence of simple aryl groups like 4-methylphenyl and 2,4-dimethylphenyl were well tolerated and gave the corresponding products 3f and 3g in 87% and 89% yield, respectively. Both electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl sulfides were also tolerated under the optimized conditions, but an electron deficient aryl sulfide furnished the product 3j in low yield compared to an electron rich aryl sulfide (3h). Interestingly, synthetically useful halogen-substituted aryl-containing tetrahydropyridines 3i, 3k–3m were achieved in good to excellent yield. Also, sterically hindered aryl sulfides underwent smooth reaction to afford products 3g, 3k–3m in good yield. Furthermore, benzyl and alkyl sulfides also gave the products 3n and 3o in 68% and 85% yield, respectively.

After successful demonstration of generation of various 1-azadienes and the self aza-Diels–Alder reaction, we were interested in the in situ trapping of the formed 1-azadiene 2 with external dienophiles, such as dihydrofuran 4. Gratifyingly, the reaction of triazole 1a with 4 equivalents of dihydrofuran 4 under the optimized conditions at prolonged reaction time (10 h) afforded the bicyclic compound, tetrahydrofuran fused tetrahydropyridine 5a in 90% yield (Scheme 3).§

Scheme 3 Rhodium catalyzed synthesis of fused-tetrahydropyridines 5: scope and limitations. ^†Isolated as mixture of 5g : 3g in 1 : 0.18 ratio.

Having shown the efficient synthesis of fused-tetrahydropyridines through in situ trapping of 1-azadiene, we focused our attention on the generality of the reaction. Keeping the dienophile, dihydrofuran 4 (4 equiv.) as constant, various substituted thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles 1 were studied under the optimized conditions (Scheme 3). Electronically and sterically different aryl substituted sulfonyl triazoles furnished the fused tetrahydropyridines 5a–5e in good to excellent yield. Similarly, various thioaryl containing tetrahydropyridines (5f–5i and 5k–5m) were also achieved in good yields from corresponding 1,2,3-triazoles. Interestingly, heteroaryl, benzoxazol-2-yl substituted sulfide-containing triazole was also tolerated under the reaction conditions to give the corresponding product 5p in 91% yield. Cyclohexyl sulfide, an alkyl sulfide substituted triazole also furnished the product 5o in 86% yield. Furthermore, synthesis of pyran-fused tetrahydropyridine 5a′ was also achieved on replacement of dihydrofuran with dihydropyran.

All the above studies prompted us to investigate various other potential dienophiles under the rhodium catalyzed tandem 1,2-sulfur migration and aza-Diels–Alder reaction with 1a to further widen the scope of the reaction. Thus, reaction of 1a and ethylvinyl ether in the presence of Rh₂(OAc)₄ at 90 °C for 12 h gave the tetrahydropyridine 6 in 84% yield (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4 Rhodium catalyzed reaction of 1a with various dienophiles. ^†Yield of 3a. ^‡NMR yield.

β-Aryl substituted enol ethers underwent smooth reaction at prolonged reaction time (12 h) to afford the expected products (7–9) in good to moderate yield, along with an isolable amount of self aza-Diels–Alder reaction product 3a. Next, reaction of α,β-disubstituted enol ether with 1a gave the corresponding tetrahydropyridine 10 in 36% yield. Interestingly, the present method also allows the synthesis of tricyclic compound 11 in 46% yield from the cyclic enol ether derived from β-tetralone. Reaction of ketene S,S-acetal²⁵ with 1a furnished the product 12 in 69% ¹H NMR yield, as an inseparable mixture along with ketene S,S-acetal. Similarly, enamine was also tolerated under the optimized conditions to afford the corresponding product 13. Consequently, neutral dienophiles such as alkynes and alkenes were also examined (Scheme 4). Reaction of 1a with phenylacetylene and p-methoxyphenylacetylene gave dihydropyridines 14 and 15, respectively, in low yield along with decomposition of starting material. Similar results were observed on reaction of 1a with styrene, which led to the formation of tetrahydropyridine 16 in 25% yield along with 61% of 3a.

Likewise, dienes were also employed as reaction partners to examine the mode of reactivity (Scheme 5). Treatment of 1a and 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene 17 in the presence of Rh₂(OAc)₄ at 90 °C led to the formation of cyclohexene 18a in very low yield following normal Diels–Alder mode, wherein the formed 1-azadiene 2a acted as a dienophile instead of diene. Increasing the reaction temperature to 120 °C afforded the product 18a in 46% yield along with decomposition of the starting material. A similar result was also observed with 1,2,3-triazole 1e and 17.

Scheme 5 Rhodium catalyzed reaction of 1a with dienes.

Interestingly, bicyclic[4.3.0]-compound 20a was isolated in moderate yield upon reaction with cyclopentadiene 19, where cyclopentadiene acted as a dienophile. Reaction of 1a with cyclohexadiene 21 furnished a mixture of bicyclic[4.4.0]-compound 20b, bridged bicyclic[2.2.2]-compound 22 and 3a in 28%, 57% and 12% yield, respectively. Thus, the isolated product showed that cyclohexadiene reacted mainly as a diene similar to 17.

After successful demonstration of reactivity of various dienophiles and dienes with N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles, we focused our attention on the direct synthesis of (fused)-tetrahydropyridines (3a and 5a) from propargyl sulfide 23 through integration of copper catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition and rhodium catalyzed tandem 1,2-sulfur migration cum aza-Diels–Alder reaction (Scheme 6). To our delight, treatment of phenyl propargyl sulfide 23 with TsN₃ in the presence of CuTc for 4 h at room temperature in toluene followed by addition of Rh₂(OAc)₄ and subsequent elevation of temperature to 90 °C afforded the expected product 3a in 66% yield. Likewise, fused tetrahydropyridine 5a was also isolated in 69% yield from phenyl propargyl sulfide 23 on reaction with CuTc followed by addition of Rh₂(OAc)₄ and dihydrofuran 4, in one-pot.

Scheme 6 One-pot conversion of propargyl sulfide 23 to 3a and 5a.

Next, the synthetic potential of the developed methodology was investigated (Scheme 7). The imine moiety in the product 3m can be readily converted to aldehyde functionality in high yield through treatment with K₂CO₃ in methanol. Interestingly, spiro-bicyclic compound 25 was accomplished from the tetrahydropyridine 3m through NaBH₃CN reduction of imine followed by copper catalyzed intramolecular C–N bond formation (Scheme 7). Additionally, the synthesized tetrahydropyridines can also be readily transformed to pyridine derivatives. Thus, the reaction of 9 with TMSOTf furnished the aromatized product 26 in 75% yield.

Scheme 7 Synthetic applications.

Based on the earlier report of 1,2-sulfur migration^1a and denitrogenative functionalization of 1,2,3-triazoles,^5a,5b we postulated the mechanism for the synthesis of tetrahydropyridines from N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles (Scheme 8). First, trapping of α-diazoimines A, generated from 1,2,3-triazole 1, with the rhodium catalyst would afford the reactive rhodium carbenoid B. Intramolecular attack of the sulfur atom onto the electrophilic carbenoid carbon would lead to the formation of thiiranium intermediate C, which upon rearrangement would furnish the 1-azadiene 2 and active rhodium species for the next catalytic cycle. Dimerization of the formed 1-azadiene 2 under thermal aza-Diels–Alder conditions furnishes the expected tetrahydropyridines 3. On the other hand, in situ trapping of 1-azadiene 2 with other dienophiles and dienes would afford the corresponding heterocycles and carbocycles.

Scheme 8 Plausible mechanism.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed an efficient rhodium catalyzed tandem 1,2-sulfur migration and aza-Diels–Alder reaction of thio-tethered N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles. The present method allows the synthesis of various substituted tetrahydropyridines, fused tetrahydropyridines, tricyclic and (bridged)bicyclic compounds and cyclohexenes in moderate to excellent yield. Interestingly, the developed strategy was successfully integrated with copper catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition for the direct conversion of propargyl sulfide to the target compounds. Furthermore, the synthetic potential of the methodology was demonstrated through the synthesis of spiro-bicyclic and substituted pyridine derivatives.

Acknowledgements

We thank Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India (Project No. SR/S1/OC-48/2012) for funding this work. DY thanks Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) for a fellowship. We thank Mr. Ramkumar (IIT Madras) for single-crystal analysis support.

Notes and references

1. (a) A. Sromek and V. Gevorgyan, in Sulfur-Mediated Rearrangements I, ed. E. Schaumann, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, vol. 274, ch. 57, pp. 77–124; (b) A. S. Dudnik, A. W. Sromek, M. Rubina, J. T. Kim, A. V. Kel'i and V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 1440–1452.
2. F. Xu, W. Shi and J. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 4191–4194.
3. L. Jiao, Q. Zhang, Y. Liang, S. Zhang and J. Xu, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 815–818.
4. (a) E. J. Yoo, M. Ahlquist, S. H. Kim, I. Bae, V. V. Fokin, K. B. Sharpless and S. Chang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1730–1733; (b) J. Raushel and V. V. Fokin, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4952–4955; (c) Y. Liu, X. Wang, J. Xu, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhao and Y. Hu, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 6294–6299.
5. (a) P. Anbarasan, D. Yadagiri and S. Rajasekar, Synthesis, 2014, 3004–3023; (b) H. M. L. Davies and J. S. Alford, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 5151–5162; (c) A. V. Gulevich and V. Gevorgyan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1371–1373.
6. (a) T. Horneff, S. Chuprakov, N. Chernyak, V. Gevorgyan and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 14972–14974; (b) M. Zibinsky and V. V. Fokin, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4870–4872.
7. (a) T. Miura, M. Yamauchi and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2009, 1470–1471; (b) B. Chattopadhyay and V. Gevorgyan, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 3746–3749; (c) Y. Shi and V. Gevorgyan, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 5394–5396.
8. (a) S. Chuprakov, S. W. Kwok, L. Zhang, L. Lercher and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 18034–18035; (b) J. S. Alford and H. M. L. Davies, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 6020–6023; (c) J. S. Alford, J. E. Spangler and H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 11712–11715; (d) J. C. Culhane and V. V. Fokin, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4578–4580.
9. (a) C.-E. Kim, S. Park, D. Eom, B. Seo and P. H. Lee, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 1900–1903; (b) S. Rajasekar and P. Anbarasan, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 8428–8434; (c) R.-Q. Ran, J. He, S.-D. Xiu, K.-B. Wang and C.-Y. Li, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 3704–3707; (d) J. Feng, Y. Wang, Q. Li, R. Jiang and Y. Tang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 6455–6458; (e) C.-E. Kim, Y. Park, S. Park and P. H. Lee, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 357, 210–220.
10. J. E. Spangler and H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6802–6805.
11. (a) M. Zibinsky and V. V. Fokin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1507–1510; (b) T. Miura, T. Tanaka, K. Hiraga, S. G. Stewart and M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 13652–13655; (c) X.-Y. Tang, Y.-S. Zhang, L. He, Y. Wei and M. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 133–136; (d) H. Shen, J. Fu, J. Gong and Z. Yang, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5588–5591; (e) Y.-S. Zhang, X.-Y. Tang and M. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 15971–15974.
12. (a) E. E. Schultz and R. Sarpong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4696–4699; (b) T. Miura, K. Hiraga, T. Biyajima, T. Nakamuro and M. Murakami, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 3298–3301; (c) S. Chuprakov, S. W. Kwok and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4652–4655; (d) T. Miura, T. Nakamuro, T. Biyajima and M. Murakami, Chem. Lett., 2015, 44, 700–702.
13. (a) S. Chuprakov, J. A. Malik, M. Zibinsky and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 10352–10355; (b) J.-M. Yang, C.-Z. Zhu, X.-Y. Tang and M. Shi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5142–5146; (c) D. Yadagiri and P. Anbarasan, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 2510–2513; (d) B. Rajagopal, C.-H. Chou, C.-C. Chung and P.-C. Lin, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 3752–3755; (e) S. Park, W.-S. Yong, S. Kim and P. H. Lee, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 4468–4471; (f) B. Seo, W. H. Jeon, J. Kim, S. Kim and P. H. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 722–732; (g) M.-H. Shen, Y.-P. Pan, Z.-H. Jia, X.-T. Ren, P. Zhang and H.-D. Xu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2015, 13, 4851–4854; (h) S. Shin, Y. Park, C.-E. Kim, J.-Y. Son and P. H. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 5859–5869.
14. (a) T. Miura, T. Biyajima, T. Fujii and M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 194–196; (b) T. Miura, T. Tanaka, T. Biyajima, A. Yada and M. Murakami, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 3883–3886; (c) S. Chuprakov, B. T. Worrell, N. Selander, R. K. Sit and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 195–202; (d) H. J. Jeon, D. J. Jung, J. H. Kim, Y. Kim, J. Bouffard and S.-G. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 9865–9871; (e) D. J. Lee and E. J. Yoo, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 1830–1833.
15. (a) D. Yadagiri and P. Anbarasan, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 15115–15119; (b) T. Miura, T. Tanaka, A. Yada and M. Murakami, Chem. Lett., 2013, 42, 1308–1310; (c) A. Boyer, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 1660–1663; (d) F. Medina, C. Besnard and J. Lacour, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 3232–3235; (e) X. Ma, S. Pan, H. Wang and W. Chen, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 4554–4557; (f) A. Boyer, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5878–5881; (g) Y. Wang, X. Lei and Y. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 4507–4510.
16. (a) B. T. Parr, S. A. Green and H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4716–4718; (b) H. Shang, Y. Wang, Y. Tian, J. Feng and Y. Tang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5662–5666; (c) D. J. Lee, H. S. Han, J. Shin and E. J. Yoo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 11606–11609; (d) B. T. Parr and H. M. L. Davies, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 10044–10047; (e) T. Miura, Y. Funakoshi and M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 2272–2275; (f) E. E. Schultz, V. N. G. Lindsay and R. Sarpong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9904–9908; (g) J. S. Alford and H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 10266–10269; (h) H.-D. Xu, K. Xu, H. Zhou, Z.-H. Jia, H. Wu, X.-L. Lu and M.-H. Shen, Synthesis, 2015, 641–646; (i) Y. Yang, M.-B. Zhou, X.-H. Ouyang, R. Pi, R.-J. Song and J.-H. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 6595–6599; (j) T. Miura, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Fujimoto, J. Nakahashi and M. Murakami, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 2454–2457; (k) E. Lee, T. Ryu, E. Shin, J.-Y. Son, W. Choi and P. H. Lee, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 2470–2473.
17. (a) N. Selander, B. T. Worrell, S. Chuprakov, S. Velaparthi and V. V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 14670–14673; (b) D. J. Jung, H. J. Jeon, J. H. Kim, Y. Kim and S.-G. Lee, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 2208–2211; (c) D. J. Lee, J. Shin and E. J. Yoo, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 6620; (d) T. Miura, T. Nakamuro, K. Hiraga and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10474–10477; (e) J. He, Z. Man, Y. Shi and C.-Y. Li, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 4816–4823.
18. (a) T. Miura, Y. Funakoshi, M. Morimoto, T. Biyajima and M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 17440–17443; (b) N. Selander, B. T. Worrell and V. V. Fokin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 13054–13057; (c) R. Liu, M. Zhang, G. Winston-McPherson and W. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4376.
19. Y. Jiang, X.-Y. Tang and M. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 2122–2125.
20. J. A. Bull, J. J. Mousseau, G. Pelletier and A. B. Charette, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 2642–2713.
21. (a) T. Mesganaw and J. A. Ellman, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2014, 18, 1097–1104; (b) J. M. Neely and T. Rovis, Org. Chem. Front., 2014, 1, 1010–1015; (c) G. Masson, C. Lalli, M. Benohoud and G. Dagousset, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 902–923; (d) J.-C. M. Monbaliu, K. G. R. Masschelein and C. V. Stevens, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 4708.
22. (a) T. D. Bailey, G. L. Goe and E. F. V. Scriven, in Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985, pp. 1–252; (b) G. R. Newkome, in Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985, pp. 635–658; (c) N. N. Mateeva, L. L. Winfield and K. K. Redda, Curr. Med. Chem., 2005, 12, 551–571.
23. C. Zheng and S.-L. You, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2498.
24. CCDC 1040728 (3a). See ESI†.
25. M. Yokoyama, H. Togo and S. Kondo, Sulfur Rep., 1990, 10, 23–43.

---

Footnotes

† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental methods, characterizations data, and ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of isolated compounds. CCDC 1040728. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c5sc02379c

‡ Synthesis of tetrahydropyridine 3a: to an oven dried 10 mL reaction tube equipped with stir bar, N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazole 1a (50 mg, 0.144 mmol) and Rh₂(OAc)₄ (1.28 mg, 0.0028 mmol, 2 mol%) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere and dissolved in 1,2-DCE (1 mL). The reaction tube was sealed and the reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 5 h. After the completion of reaction, based on TLC analysis, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The resultant crude was purified by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (9 : 1) as eluant to afford tetrahydropyridine 3a in 94% yield. Mp: 131–133 °C; FTIR (KBr): 3101, 2956, 1620, 1595, 1472, 1439, 1331, 1163, 1088, 1040, 960, 835, 812, 787, 743, 691, 664, 566, 538, 502 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, 24 °C): δ 8.71 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, 2H, J = 8.24 Hz), 7.44–7.34 (m, 7H), 7.32–7.25 (m, 6H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 3H), 7.13 (s, 1H), 2.49 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.05 (dd, 1H, J = 6.09, 18.12 Hz), 1.92 (dd, 1H, J = 6.92, 14.66 Hz), 1.66–1.61 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃, 24 °C): δ 168.7, 145.2, 144.9, 137.5, 135.3, 134.8, 133.1, 130.6, 130.0, 129.3, 129.3, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 127.7, 127.0, 126.7, 119.0, 71.8, 28.0, 25.3, 21.8, 21.7; HRMS: calcd for C₃₂H₃₀N₂O₄S₄ + H: 635.1161; found: 635.1152.

§ Synthesis of fused tetrahydropyridines 5a: to an oven dried 10 mL reaction tube equipped with stir bar, N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazole 1a (50 mg, 0.144 mmol) and Rh₂(OAc)₄ (1.28 mg, 0.0028 mmol, 2 mol%) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere and dissolved in 1,2-DCE (1 mL). Next, 2,3-dihydrofuran 4 (40 mg, 0.576 mmol, 4 equiv.) was introduced through a syringe. The reaction tube was sealed and the reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 10 h. After the completion of reaction, based on TLC analysis, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The resultant crude was purified by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (92 : 8) as eluant to furnish the fused tetrahydropyridine 5a in 90% yield. Mp: 121–123 °C; FTIR (KBr): 3052, 2941, 2889, 1640, 1598, 1475, 1436, 1404, 1351, 1240, 1106, 1027, 967, 862, 803, 746, 695, 667, 587, 549 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, 24 °C): δ 7.83 (d, 2H, J = 8.16 Hz), 7.33 (d, 2H, J = 8.36 Hz), 7.29–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.17 (m, 3H), 7.14–7.13 (m, 1H), 5.55 (d, 1H, J = 4.36 Hz), 3.84–3.77 (m, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.35–2.32 (m, 1H), 2.22 (dd, 1H, J = 6.64, 17.14 Hz), 2.13–2.08 (m, 1H), 1.98–1.92 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.70 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃, 24 °C): δ 144.4, 136.8, 135.5, 129.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 127.6, 126.3, 108.9, 83.9, 64.4, 35.8, 29.9, 28.4, 21.7; HRMS: calcd for C₂₀H₂₁NO₃S₂ + H: 388.1041; found: 388.1056.

---