Space charge-induced unusually-high mobility of a solution-processed indium oxide thin film transistor with an ethylene glycol incorporated aluminum oxide gate dielectric

Hyungjin Park a, Yunyong Nama, Jungho Jinb and Byeong-Soo Bae*a
aLaboratory of Optical Materials and Coating (LOMC), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea. E-mail: bsbae@kaist.ac.kr
bMultiscale Hybrid Materials Laboratory (MHML), School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ulsan, 93 Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan 680-749, Korea

Received 10th October 2015 , Accepted 23rd November 2015

First published on 24th November 2015


Abstract

The incorporation of ethylene glycol (EG) into a high-k aluminium oxide gate dielectric layer was achieved by a solution process, leading to a distinct increase in the mobility of indium oxide TFT. Frequency-dependent capacitance originating from residual EG was examined and the accompanying effects on indium oxide TFT were studied.


Oxide thin film transistors (TFTs) have been widely studied as an element of driving and switching circuits for flat panel, flexible, and transparent displays. A metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) as a channel layer has various advantages, including transparency, large area reproducibility, and high stability, as well as good electrical characteristics. Although carrier mobilities of MOSs are generally much higher than those of amorphous silicon semiconductors (∼1 cm2 V−1 s−1), in order to achieve high-definition and high-resolution displays, the MOSs must afford comparable mobility with low temperature poly-silicon (over 100 cm2 V−1 s−1) for high-speed driving.1 In this regard, various processing techniques have been studied to improve the electrical properties of the semiconductor layer, composed of indium zinc oxide (IZO), indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO), indium oxide (In2O3), or zinc tin oxide (ZTO).2–7 However, MOS channel layers deposited on the conventional silicon dioxide (SiO2) as the gate dielectric have shown a limited mobility of up to around 40 cm2 V−1 s−1.8

Recent research in this area has focused on improving TFT performance by introducing various gate dielectrics. Since the gate dielectric layer adheres to the electron channel generated from the semiconductor layer, its structural and electrical properties significantly affect the TFT performance. Requisites of the gate dielectric for high performance are a smooth surface and compatibility with semiconductor materials while simultaneously offering good insulating properties such as a wide band gap and high capacitance. In particular, high capacitance of the dielectric layer (high-k) readily attracts carrier electrons under a low gate bias, resulting in a high on-current and mobility.9,10 Zhang et al. showed a high mobility of 40.5 cm2 V−1 s−1 using sputtering Ta2O5 as the gate dielectric in a ZnO TFT.11 Park et al. reported a solution-processed indium oxide (In2O3) TFT with a boron (B) doped ZrO2 dielectric (k ∼ 12.1) with a mobility of 39.3 cm2 V−1 s−1 through 250 °C annealing, whereas a SiO2 dielectric (k ∼ 3.9) based In2O3 TFT showed mobility of 15.95 cm2 V−1 s−1.12 In addition, even oxide TFTs exhibiting mobility over 100 cm2 V−1 s−1 using solution-processed AlOx and YOx gate dielectrics have been reported.13,14

However, notably high mobility, especially with reduced annealing temperature of the dielectric layer seems questionable, because of the defective nature of solution-processed metal oxide layers. The similarity found in literature on high mobility achieved by high-k gate dielectric is that they use a mixture of solvents containing ethylene glycol (EG). EG increases the viscosity of the solution resulting in a thicker gate dielectric layer.13,15–17 Due to a higher boiling point of around 197 °C than common solvents such as 2-methoxyethanol (∼124 °C) and acetonitrile (∼81 °C), EG may contribute to undecomposed residuals in the layer in a low-temperature process.18 Another suspicious point is that the manner of calculating mobility from on-current. When a dielectric material contains impurities, the capacitance varies depending on frequency.17,19,20 According to the square-law equation, the capacitance of the gate dielectric is inversely related to the mobility, which raises the importance of choosing an appropriate k value, especially for a high-k gate dielectric.

Herein, we investigate the unusual high mobility observed in metal oxide TFT adopting a solution-processed aluminum oxide (AO) gate dielectric. Precursor solutions with and without EG are designed to track the thermal evolution of the aluminum oxide layer and analyze its electrical properties at discrete temperature. With an aqueous route indium oxide semiconductor which has the lower annealing temperature than the gate dielectric, the effect of EG in AO gate dielectric on the TFT performance is examined.

The preparation steps for an AO and EG-AO gate dielectric and In2O3 TFT are described in Fig. 1. The AO film, as a reference, was prepared by dissolving aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (Al(NO3)3·9H2O, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich) in 2-methoxyethanol (CH3OCH2CH2OH, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich). For the EG-AO films, aluminum nitrate was dissolved in a mixture of ethylene glycol (HOCH2CH2OH, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich) and 2-methoxyethanol with a 50/50 volume ratio. The molar concentration of the solutions was set to 0.4 M and the solutions were stirred for 6 hours. The precursor solutions were spincoated at 3000 rpm for 25 seconds and dried for 10 minutes at the final annealing temperature. AO film was fabricated by 6 iterative coating and drying cycles and EG-AO films were prepared by 4 cycles to obtain the desired thickness. Finally, spun-on films were annealed at 250, 350, and 500 °C for 4 hours in air and referred to as AO 250 °C, EG-AO 250, 350, and 500 °C. The thicknesses of the AO 250 °C, EG-AO 250, 350, and 500 °C layers are 190 nm, 155 nm, 110 nm, and 100 nm, respectively (Fig. S1a–d). As the annealing temperature increases, solutions are decomposed and/or evaporated resulting in dense films. The AO and EG-AO films are in an amorphous phase up to 500 °C (Fig. S1e) and all the films show excellent root mean square roughness (RRMS) of 0.187 nm, 0.198 nm, 0.102 nm, and 0.119 nm, respectively, contributing to high insulating ability and a smooth surface (Fig. S2).21


image file: c5ra21022d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration for fabrication of (a) MIM device structure using aluminum oxide (AO) or ethylene glycol-incorporated aluminum oxide (EG-AO) gate dielectric and (b) indium oxide TFT based on AO and EG-AO gate dielectric.

Fig. 2 shows the output and transfer characteristic curves of the In2O3 TFTs with the AO and EG-AO gate dielectric. An aqueous indium oxide precursor solution was synthesized by dissolving 0.2 M indium nitrate hydrate in de-ionized water.2 The synthesized solution was spin-coated on the prepared AO or EG-AO/p + Si substrate at 5000 rpm for 30 s. The annealing process was carried out at 250 °C for 4 h in air. The Al source and drain electrodes were then deposited on the semiconductor layer by e-beam evaporation with a shadow mask. The thickness of the Al source/drain electrode was 100 nm and the channel width and length were 1000 μm and 100 μm, respectively. All of the In2O3 TFTs exhibited clear pinch-off behavior in the output curve. The drain current (ID) of the In2O3 TFT with EG-AO 250 °C in the output curve is one order higher than that of the other TFTs. Its transfer characteristics also show superior electrical results, exhibiting an on-current (ION) of 2.5 × 10−3 A, an on/off ratio (ION/OFF) of around 105, and a sub-threshold swing (S.S.) of 0.28. The field-effect mobility (μsat) of the TFTs can be calculated in the saturation region using the following equation:

 
image file: c5ra21022d-t1.tif(1)
where IDS is the drain to the source current, W and L are the width and length of the channel, respectively, Ci is the capacitance per unit area of gate dielectric, VG is the gate voltage, and VT is the threshold voltage.


image file: c5ra21022d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Output characteristics of solution-processed 250 °C In2O3 TFTs with (a) AO 250 °C, (b) EG-AO 250 °C, (c) EG-AO 350 °C, and (d) EG-AO 500 °C gate dielectric. Range of gate voltage is 0 V to 6 V with a step of 1 V. (e) Transfer curves of In2O3 TFTs with AO and EG-AO films prepared at various temperatures as gate dielectrics.

To calculate the mobility of the TFT with each gate dielectric, the capacitance was measured using a metal–insulator–metal (MIM) structure as a function of frequency from 20 Hz to 1 MHz (Fig. 3a). In addition, dielectric constant was obtained using the equation; C = ε0kA/d, where C is the capacitance of the gate dielectric layer, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity (8.85 × 10−14 F cm−1), A is the area of the capacitor, and d is the thickness of the dielectric (Fig. 3b). The AO 250 °C, EG-AO 350 °C, and EG-AO 500 °C exhibit a nearly flat capacitance–frequency curve (Cf curve) and constant capacitance over the entire range of frequency. According to the conventional manner in which the capacitance at 1 MHz is used for the mobility calculation, the In2O3 TFTs with AO 250 °C, EG-AO 350 °C, and 500 °C dielectrics show mobilities of 23.1 cm2 V−1 s−1, 30.5 cm2 V−1 s−1, and 23.3 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively. On the other hand, the EG-AO 250 °C gate dielectric experiences a frequency-dependent capacitance, especially at a low frequency region. Since the characterization of TFT device is conducted in a static condition, the capacitance value at a low frequency qualifies for extracting representative mobility. While the capacitance at 1 Hz is 110 nF cm−2, where 1 Hz capacitance is assumed by extrapolating to a frequency of 1 Hz from the Cf curve, it significantly decreases to one third (35.7 nF cm−2) as the frequency increases to 1 MHz.17,19,20 When using capacitance of 1 MHz, the mobility of the EG-AO 250 °C based TFT is 136.4 cm2 V−1 s−1. Such high mobility is adjusted to 46.2 cm2 V−1 s−1 by calculating from k at 1 Hz. The electrical properties of each device is summarized in Table 1.


image file: c5ra21022d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Capacitance and (b) dielectric constant curves according to frequency of MIM devices fabricated using AO and EG-AO films annealed at various temperatures as insulators. TGA results of (c) AO and (d) EG-AO precursor solutions after annealing at various temperatures for 4 h. The heating rate was 5 °C min−1. FT-IR spectra of (e) AO and (f) EG-AO films annealed at various temperatures.
Table 1 Summary of electrical properties of AO and EG-AO dielectric layers annealed at various temperatures and In2O3 TFTs prepared using those films as gate dielectrics
Dielectrics Capacitance (nF cm−2) Dielectric constant Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) ION (A) at 10 V ION/OFF S.S. (V dec−1)
ata 1 Hz at 1 MHz ata 1 Hz at 1 MHz atb 1 Hz at 1 MHz
a Obtained from extrapolated capacitance curve.b Calculated from capacitance at 1 Hz.
AO 250 °C 40.5 27 8.7 5.8 19.4 23.1 2.9 × 10−4 ∼105 0.35
EG-AO 250 °C 110 35.7 19.2 6.25 46.2 136.4 2.5 × 10−3 ∼105 0.28
EG-AO 350 °C 48.3 42.6 6 5.3 25.7 30.5 3.8 × 10−4 ∼104 0.99
EG-AO 500 °C 54.9 47.8 6.2 5.4 19.7 23.3 3.7 × 10−4 ∼103 1.2


The frequency-dependent capacitance is clearly observed when EG is included in precursor solution and annealed at temperature lower than 350 °C. TGA analysis of EG-AO precursor solution dried at 120 °C displays a large amount of weight loss compared with AO precursor solution and the thermal decomposition terminates over 450 °C (Fig. S3). Since the only difference between the two samples is the existence of EG in the solution, the noticeable drop in weight is attributed to EG, which has a high onset of decomposition temperature (240 °C) and boiling point (197.6 °C).18 Moreover, discrete weight loss over 330 °C indicates that high thermal energy is necessary to completely eliminate undecomposed residuals in the EG-AO film.

In order to determine the quantity of the undecomposed portion in the film after the final annealing process, the AO and EG-AO precursor solutions were annealed at 250 °C, 350 °C, and 500 °C for 4 hours and collected for TGA measurement. As presented in Fig. 3c and d, all samples show negligible weight loss up to each annealing temperature. Beyond the annealing temperatures, the weights gradually decrease up to 700 °C. For the samples annealed at 350 °C and 500 °C, the final weight losses are around 10%, and 5%, respectively, regardless of whether EG is incorporated. On the other hand, 250 °C annealed AO and EG-AO show a large disparity in weight loss over 300 °C. The EG-AO 250 °C sample ends up having less than 60% of its initial weight, whereas the AO 250 °C sample retains around 80% of its weight up to 700 °C. Even though most of the weight loss occurs in a range of 300 °C to 400 °C for EG-AO 250 °C, weight loss of EG-AO 350 °C and AO 350 °C is almost identical, indicating that EG-related undecomposed residuals are decomposed with sufficient annealing time.

The chemical species of the residuals in the films were investigated by FT-IR (Fig. 3e and f). The vibration peaks related to NO3 are assigned to 1200–1700 cm−1, and they originate from aluminium nitrate in both the AO and EG-AO precursor solutions.21,22 Nitrate groups are observed in films annealed at below 250 °C and removed after 350 °C due to thermal decomposition. A broad peak in the range of 3000–3500 cm−1 indicates hydroxyl groups (–OH) derived from hydrolysis of the precursor solutions. As the annealing temperature increases, condensation and dihydroxylation reactions become more active leading to a decrease in intensities of the hydroxyl-related peaks from the AO and EG-AO films.23 A distinction between the AO and EG-AO films appears in the carbon-related peaks. The peaks at 2800–2900 cm−1 and 1000–1100 cm−1 correspond to the C–H and C–O vibration peaks, respectively.23 The peak at 900–1000 cm−1 is attributed to the C–C stretching vibration.24 Sharp and strong C–H, C–O, and C–C peaks are observed only in the EG-AO films prepared at 200 °C and 250 °C, and disappear after 350 °C. In contrast, none of the AO films shows carbon-related peaks. When the precursor solution containing EG is annealed under 250 °C, EG is not fully decomposed and leaves carbon-related species, such as C–O, C–H, and C–C, in the films. Combining the results of the TGA and FT-IR analyses, it is concluded that the EG-AO film annealed at 250 °C contains abundant EG-related carbon species.

Even though several literatures reported that hydroxyl and nitrate group induce the frequency-dependent capacitance, AO 250 °C containing those shows constant capacitance over the entire range of frequency.17,19 Thus, EG residuals in EG-AO 250 °C are the main reason for increase of capacitance at low frequency. Under external applied bias, EG residuals are polarized and polar groups located at the end of EG residuals easily capture charge carriers, producing space charges inside AO film.14,25 At a low frequency, the increase in capacitance due to space charge polarization results in a high current level of In2O3 TFT. As the frequency increases, the rotation of EG residual is interrupted due to friction against the AO matrix and charge carriers constructing space charges undergo macroscopic migration to change the orientation of polarization. Eventually, they cannot follow the field and, as a consequence, remain randomly oriented, resulting in a decrease in capacitance.

Observation of the hysteresis of the transfer curves further clarifies the EG residual in the AO layer acting as the source of the space charge polarization. Fig. 4 displays the hysteresis of the transfer curves of the samples under forward and reverse gate bias sweeps. The EG-free AO based In2O3 TFTs (see Fig. 4a, c and d) show clockwise hysteresis during the forward–reverse sweep; this is related to charge trapping at the channel/dielectric interface because the trapped electrons screen the applied gate field.26,27 In contrast, counter-clockwise hysteresis is observed in the EG-AO based In2O3 TFTs. During the forward gate bias sweep, the EG residuals are polarized according to the gate bias. As the reverse bias sweep begins, the change of the polarization lags behind the decreasing gate bias due to its restricted responding speed, i.e. slow polarization, retaining higher capacitance formed at high gate bias.28 The higher capacitance generates higher current (eqn (1)) during reverse sweep than in the case of forward bias, which leads to counter-clockwise hysteresis.


image file: c5ra21022d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Hysteresis behaviors of the In2O3 TFTs measured under the forward and reverse sweeping with (a) AO 250 °C, (b) EG-AO 250 °C, (b) EG-AO 350 °C, and (c) EG-AO 500 °C gate dielectric. Insets of (c) and (d) are enlarged pictures of each transfer curve.

Conclusions

In summary, we have investigated unusual high mobility of metal oxide TFT with solution-processed aluminum oxide gate dielectric. According to TGA and FT-IR analyses, EG in precursor solution is not fully decomposed and incorporated in the aluminum oxide layer at a low annealing temperature. EG residuals act as space charges, inducing frequency-dependent capacitance and leading to high capacitance at a low frequency. In this case, if the channel mobility is calculated with the conventional capacitance value at 1 MHz, it represents the severely overestimated value. Since TFTs operates in static condition, it is plausible to adopt the capacitance at 1 Hz for the calculation of the channel mobility. Our conclusions may not apply to all studies on TFTs in which solution-processed Al2O3 gate dielectric with EG solvent is used. The mobility determined by frequency-dependent capacitance also depends on the maximum annealing temperature used during TFT processing, especially below 250 °C.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Materials Original Technology Program (10041222) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (CAFDC 5-3, NRF-2007-0056090).

References

  1. Y. Sun and J. A. Rogers, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 1897 CrossRef CAS.
  2. Y. H. Hwang, J.-S. Seo, J. M. Yun, H. Park, S. Yang, S.-H. Ko Park and B.-S. Bae, NPG Asia Mater., 2013, 5, e45 CrossRef CAS.
  3. J.-S. Park, J. K. Jeong, M. Yeon-Gon, H.-D. Kim and S.-I. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 90, 262106 CrossRef.
  4. P. Barquinha, A. M. Vila, G. Goncalves, L. Pereira, R. Martins, J. R. Morante and E. Fortunato, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 2008, 55, 954 CrossRef CAS.
  5. H. Q. Chiang, J. F. Wager, R. L. Hoffman, J. Jeong and D. A. Keszler, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, 86, 013503 CrossRef.
  6. E. Fortunato, P. Barquinha, G. Gonçalves, L. Pereira and R. Martins, Solid-State Electron., 2008, 52, 443 CrossRef CAS.
  7. Y.-L. Wang, F. Ren, W. Lim, D. P. Norton, S. J. Pearton, I. I. Kravchenko and J. M. Zavada, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 90, 159 Search PubMed.
  8. J.-S. Park, H. Kim and I.-D. Kim, J. Electroceram., 2013, 32, 117 CrossRef.
  9. S. H. Kim, S. Nam, J. Jang, K. Hong, C. Yang, D. S. Chung, C. E. Park and W.-S. Choi, J. Appl. Phys., 2009, 105, 104509 CrossRef.
  10. E. Lee, J. Ko, K.-H. Lim, K. Kim, S. Y. Park, J. M. Myoung and Y. S. Kim, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2014, 24, 4689 CrossRef CAS.
  11. L. Zhang, J. Li, X. W. Zhang, X. Y. Jiang and Z. L. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009, 95, 072112 CrossRef.
  12. J. H. Park, Y. B. Yoo, K. H. Lee, W. S. Jang, J. Y. Oh, S. S. Chae, H. W. Lee, S. W. Han and H. K. Baik, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 8067 CAS.
  13. P. K. Nayak, M. N. Hedhili, D. Cha and H. N. Alshareef, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 103, 033518 CrossRef.
  14. K. Song, W. Yang, Y. Jung, S. Jeong and J. Moon, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 21265 RSC.
  15. C. Avis and J. Jang, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 10649 RSC.
  16. W. Yang, K. Song, Y. Jung, S. Jeong and J. Moon, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 27 Search PubMed.
  17. S. Jeong, J. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Seo, S.-Y. Kim, J. Park, B.-H. Ryu, W. Yang, J. Moon and Y. Choi, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 4236 RSC.
  18. H. Yue, Y. Zhao, X. Ma and J. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 4218 RSC.
  19. J. H. Park, K. Kim, Y. B. Yoo, S. Y. Park, K.-H. Lim, K. H. Lee, H. K. Baik and Y. S. Kim, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 7166 RSC.
  20. B. N. Pal, B. M. Dhar, K. C. See and H. E. Katz, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 898 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. J. Jose, M. J. Bushiri, K. Jayakumar, V. K. Vaidyan and V. S. Jayakumar, AIP Conf. Proc., 2008, 1075, 125 CrossRef CAS.
  22. L. Djoudi, M. Omari and N. Madoui, EPJ Web Conf., 2012, 29, 00016 CrossRef CAS.
  23. B. Chieng, N. Ibrahim, W. Yunus and M. Hussein, Polymers, 2013, 6, 93 CrossRef.
  24. B. Helina, P. Selvarajan and A. S. J. L. Rose, Phys. Scr., 2012, 85, 055803 CrossRef.
  25. S. C. Lim, S. H. Kim, J. B. Koo, J. H. Lee, C. H. Ku, Y. S. Yang and T. Zyung, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 90, 173512 CrossRef.
  26. C. S. Kim, S. J. Jo, S. W. Lee, W. J. Kim, H. K. Baik and S. J. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 958 CrossRef CAS.
  27. J. Liu, D. B. Buchholz, J. W. Hennek, R. P. H. Chang, A. Facchetti and T. J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11934 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. N. B. Ukah, J. Granstrom, R. R. S. Gari, G. M. King and S. Guha, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2011, 99, 243302 CrossRef.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: TGA analyses of precursor solutions. TEM, XRD and AFM data of Al2O3 film. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra21022d
Equally contributed to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.