Anton
Liopo
ab,
Shaowei
Wang‡
a,
Paul J.
Derry
a,
Alexander A.
Oraevsky
b and
Eugene R.
Zubarev
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. E-mail: zubarev@rice.edu
bTomoWave Laboratories Inc., Houston, Texas 77081, USA
First published on 21st October 2015
A novel protocol for the seedless synthesis of gold nanorods (AuNRs) using dopamine as a reductant has been developed. We report that the concentration of CTAB can be reduced to 22 mM and that the AuNRs' longitudinal surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) can be tuned from 700 to 1050 nm. The size of the AuNRs can also be tuned from 7 × 30 nm to 20 × 100 nm. The amphiphilicity and the cationic structure of the protonated dopamine enable it to interact favorably with the CTAB bilayer and lead to a high-yield synthesis of AuNRs (80–95%). LSPR peaks, size, and aspect ratio of the synthesized AuNRs can be tuned by adjusting the concentration and ratio of silver ions, CTAB, and dopamine. In addition, this reaction is much faster than previously reported methods requiring only 30 minutes to complete.
Most AuNR syntheses fall into one of four categories: electrochemical,13 photochemical,14 seed-mediated,15 and templated methods.16 The most reliable method is the seed-mediated synthesis introduced by El-Sayed et al.15 and Murphy et al.17 in which cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and silver nitrate control the growth of anisotropic nanocrystals. El-Sayed and co-workers described the synthesis of AuNRs with LSPR up to 1000 nm through the use of a mixed surfactant system CTAB/BDAC (benzyldimethylhexadecyl-ammonium chloride).15 Other factors such as temperature,18 pH,19 the type of surfactant,20–22 reagents concentration,17 aromatic additives,22,23 and the seed quality24 are also known to influence the growth and purity of AuNRs.
In situ seed formation, or “seedless” growth was initially reported by Jana et al. in 2001.25 In a seedless synthesis, AuNRs are synthesized by directly adding NaBH4 into a growth solution containing Au(I) ions, silver nitrate, CTAB, and ascorbic acid.26 However, this method produces highly polydisperse AuNRs with a large amount of spherical particles. Recently, a variation of the seedless protocol has been developed for smaller nanorods.27
It is well-known that phenolic and polyphenolic compounds can function as mild reducing agents. Although their reduction potentials are typically lower than ascorbic acid, they are able to reduce Au(III) to Au(I) at room temperature. Vigderman et al. reported that hydroquinone could be successfully used as a drop-in replacement for ascorbic acid in the seed-mediated synthesis of AuNRs.28 Similarly, Zhang and co-workers reported that 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene and 1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene are also suitable for that purpose.29 In addition, dopamine (DA) was found to be an effective reductant in the synthesis of spherical gold,30 silver,31,32 zinc oxide,33 and iron oxide nanoparticles.34 Besides the reducing ability of dopamine, its oxidation byproduct, polydopamine, can be used as a nanoparticle stabilizer.30 Recently, Su et al. reported the first synthesis of AuNRs using dopamine in a seed mediated protocol and demonstrated its high efficiency.35
However, the use of DA in the seedless synthesis of AuNRs has not been reported to date. Here we describe a tunable and facile method for the controlled seedless synthesis of AuNRs using dopamine as a reductant at CTAB concentrations well below previously reported values and at room temperature.
Scheme 1 shows the reduction of Au(III) to Au(I) by the oxidation of DA (stage 1) and further reduction of Au(I) to Au(0) by sodium borohydride to produce initial gold nuclei (stage 2). The subsequent deposition of gold onto the nuclei and the ensuing growth of AuNRs is due to disproportionation of Au(I) ions, which is known to be catalyzed by metallic gold surface.40 The DA molecules play the role of a scavenger for Au(III) ions that are generated in the course of this disproportionation reaction and quickly convert them to Au(I), thus completing the catalytic cycle (stage 3). This is essentially the same role played by ascorbic acid in a conventional seed-mediated synthesis.15,17 Both ascorbic acid and DA are not strong enough reducing agents to convert Au(I) directly to Au(0), but they are necessary sources of electrons that allow the disproportionation reaction to proceed and continuously convert nearly all Au(I) ions to metallic gold. However, Su and co-workers35 have recently reported that the seed-mediated synthesis of AuNRs requires a large excess of DA. This observation was also consistent with the results of Vigderman et al.28 when using hydroquinone as a scavenger of Au(III) ions.
It is important to differentiate the role of NaBH4 from that of DA in our synthesis. The molar ratio of NaBH4versus Au(I) is typically 1:50, which means that no more than 8% of Au(I) ions can be converted to metallic gold by NaBH4 even if all four hydride ions are used for reduction (stage 2 in Scheme 1). Thus, NaBH4 only generates the initial nuclei that are necessary to catalyze the disproportionation of Au(I) ions (stage 3). The subsequent growth of AuNRs is solely due to the deposition of Au(0) generated from the disproportionation reaction. To corroborate this idea we performed ICP-OES analysis and determined that 88% of gold ions have been converted to metallic gold after 2.5 h. This implies that the overall yield of conversion is considerably higher than that in classical seed-mediated procedures.15,17
Aside from its ability to act as a reducing agent, DA can also stabilize the surface of growing AuNRs due to its amphiphilic character. This may be beneficial for the synthesis of anisotropic nanostructures.41 The FTIR spectra of seed-mediated gold nanorods synthesized with DA were reported by Su and suggested the presence of DA at the surface of AuNRs.35 These authors have also shown that LSPR can be tuned at low CTAB concentration. Therefore, the DA may play a dual role in the seedless preparation of AuNRs: reducing Au(III) to Au(I) and aiding the growth of the AuNRs by mediating the binding between CTAB and the growing AuNRs. This binding may enable a significant reduction in the amount of CTAB required for the successful synthesis of nanorods, which is known to be the most expensive reagent in the conventional El Sayed–Murphy synthesis.15,17
It is well known that additives such as salicylates and other aromatic species play an important role in the monodispersity, morphology, and shape-yield of the resulting AuNRs.22 Our experiments show that DA does not act solely as a reductant, but also has a stabilizing effect on the synthesized AuNRs. Fig. 1 shows the UV-vis spectra of AuNRs synthesized with DA (13.5 to 90 mM.) When 13.5 mM (Fig. 1a) of dopamine was used, the yield was poor and the LSPR peak was around 670 nm. As the concentration was increased to 27 mM (Fig. 1b) and then to 45 mM (Fig. 1c), the LSPR showed a red shift to 795 and 805 nm, respectively. When the amount of dopamine increased beyond 67.5 mM (Fig. 1d and e) the LSPR peak slightly blue-shifted, but there was a considerable reduction in its intensity. These results suggest that exceeding a certain concentration of DA may not reduce the aspect ratio of AuNRs, but can decrease their yield in comparison to spherical impurities.
Along with the overall concentration of DA, we investigated the effect of its addition in several increments and in a different order during the reaction. We found that the addition of DA in the following order provided the best results: CTAB (1) + DA (2, ½ volume) + HAuCl4 (3), +AgNO3 (4), +DA (5, ½ volume) and NaBH4 (6). We tested three different DA addition orders: (a) ½ DA + ½ DA; (b) H2O + DA; (c) DA + H2O (Fig. S1†). We obtained the best results by performing the two-part addition of DA before and after the addition of silver nitrate. Additionally, we examined the influence of temperature and the concentration of gold ions on LSPR peak in order to identify the best set of conditions (Fig. S2 and S3†).
AuNRs could be grown in solutions with CTAB concentrations well below 0.1 M because both DA and resulting DQ can stabilize the growing nanorods. Our procedure allows for the synthesis of AuNRs from CTAB solutions with concentrations as low as 9 mM. We examined a CTAB concentration range between 9 and 180 mM (Fig. 2) and observed a gradual LSPR red-shift from 730 nm for (9 mM CTAB) to 1040 nm (90 mM CTAB). At 180 mM, however, the LSPR blue-shifted to 915 nm accompanied by an overall loss in the yield and quality of AuNRs. The general trend is that the aspect ratio of AuNRs initially increases directly with the concentration of CTAB, but there is a threshold concentration that when surpassed leads to a reduction in the wavelength and intensity of the LSPR peak (Fig. S7C†). This may be related to high solution viscosity at CTAB concentration above 100 mM and the formation of insoluble silver bromide.
Ye et al.22 have recently reported that aromatic additives such as salicylates can intercalate with CTAB bilayers and modulate the geometry of AuNRs. In addition, they demonstrated that the concentration of CTAB could be reduced to as low as 50 mM without compromising the quality of nanorods. One can envision that DA, and especially the resulting DQ, are also able to incorporate into CTAB bilayer given their amphiphilic structure and the positively charged polar head (protonated amino group).
The pH of the growth solution was previously shown to have a direct impact on the size and quality of AuNRs prepared with sodium oleate as a reducing agent.42 We anticipated that such a phenomenon could also occur with dopamine. To test this hypothesis, we included a small amount of HCl and found that after 24 h of growth with variable concentrations of HCl (0 to 4.0 μM), the decrease in pH value had a detrimental effect on the quality and shape-yield of AuNRs. Fig. S4† shows that in the growth solutions with 0.5 μM HCl the LSPR shifts from 820 nm to 835 nm. However, at higher concentrations (1–4 μM) the peak blue-shifts to lower wavelengths and the longitudinal-to-transverse plasmon ratio decrease significantly.
The reduction in yield and blue-shift of the LSPR suggest that under strong acidic conditions the oxidation of DA is much slower, which is consistent with kinetic studies of hydroquinones oxidation as a function of pH.39
We also investigated the relationship between the LSPR and the final concentration of NaBH4. We examined a concentration range of NaBH4 from 0 to 36 μM with results presented in Fig. S5.† The concentration of NaBH4 that gives the highest LSPR wavelength was found to be 5 μM, and further increments resulted in a blue-shift of the peak. Interestingly, Ali and coworkers27 performed a similar analysis of sodium borohydride concentration and observed a red shift of LSPR peak when the pH was in the range between 1 and 2 and ascorbic acid was used as a scavenger of Au(III) ions. Our growth solution had a higher pH (3–4) and required a NaBH4 concentration of 10–20 μM for reproducible results. With these findings we can conclude that for seedless syntheses the type of reducing agent and the molar ratio between CTAB, AgNO3, and NaBH4 play an important role in determining the overall yield and morphology of AuNRs.
It is well-known that changes in silver nitrate concentration can influence the aspect ratio of AuNRs. We tested the effect of varying the Ag+ concentration in 22 mM and 90 mM CTAB growth solutions by adding increasing amounts of 100 mM AgNO3 solution (Fig. 3, Fig. S6†). We observed a single UV-vis peak at 525 nm when AgNO3 concentration was in the range from 0.9 μM to 9 μM, which suggested the formation of only spherical nanoparticles. However, at the concentrations from 9 to 90 μM the wavelength of LSPR peak was tunable, but only to a small extent. We believe that the fairly narrow range of achievable LSRPs in 22 mM CTAB is mainly due to the low solubility of Ag+ in halide-containing solutions. This is very similar to the preparation of AuNRs when ascorbic acid is used.15 Work by Xu et al. showed that the seedless synthesis of AuNRs is also similarly affected by the high concentration of Ag+ and CTAB.43
The evolution of the UV-vis spectra of AuNRs during their growth is illustrated in Fig. 4. The spectra are different for each protocol, but both have similar trends with red-shifting and stabilization. However, for dopamine-synthesized AuNRs (Fig. 4a and b) the process is much faster and the LSPR quickly stabilizes after 25–30 min from the start of the synthesis, whereas for hydroquinone-synthesized AuNRs (Fig. 4c and d) it stabilizes only after 240 min. This is an important advantage of the reported synthesis, which provides an opportunity to produce AuNRs in a much quicker fashion than conventional protocols (Table 1).
Fig. 4 Evolution of the UV-vis spectra during the synthesis: AuNRs prepared by reduction with DA (A, B) and hydroquinone (C, D) using a similar seedless protocol (see ESI† for details). |
Sample | Volume (nm3) | Shape yield (%) |
---|---|---|
5A | 1600 | 80 |
5B | 7450 | 90 |
5C | 31100 | 94 |
Size distribution, absorbance spectra, and TEM images are presented for gold nanorods synthesized by reduction with dopamine in Fig. 5. Samples 5A and 5B have similar aspect ratios: 3.7 ± 0.8 and 3.8 ± 0.9; but with different dimensions of 30.1 × 8.2 and 50.6 × 13.7 nm, respectively. Sample 5A was prepared with a low concentration of CTAB (22 mM), 27 mM dopamine, and 0.91 mM silver nitrate. The average volume of AuNRs in sample 5A is 1600 nm3, whereas the shape-yield is close to 80%. Sample 5B was prepared with the same concentrations of CTAB (25 mM) and dopamine (27 mM), but the AgNO3 concentration was doubled (1.82 mM). This change led to an increase in the average volume and shape-yield of AuNRs to 7450 nm3 and 90%, respectively. In contrast, sample 5C was prepared with high concentration of CTAB (100 mM) and dopamine 45 mM, but the same silver nitrate concentration of 1.82 mM. The average volume of AuNRs in this case increases to 31100 nm3, which is nearly 20 times higher, but the shape-yield still remains very high (∼95%). The size distribution of AuNRs is fairly narrow (Fig. 5) indicating a reliable morphological control for each synthesis (details of AuNR preparations and additional TEM images are available in Fig. S7†). Our synthesis demonstrates that yields in excess of 90% are possible for a seedless protocol, which compares favorably to previously reported methods.29 These examples illustrate the robust and flexible nature of dopamine as a reducing agent for the preparation of AuNRs with tunable sizes and aspect ratios.
Fig. 5 Size distribution, UV-vis spectra and TEM images of AuNRs synthesized by reduction with dopamine under different conditions (see Fig. S7A–C,† respectively). Length (L) and width (W) are in nm. Scale bars in TEM images are 100 nm. |
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra19817h |
‡ Current address: Center for Optical and Electromagnetic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |