David Hurem and
Travis Dudding*
Department of Chemistry, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave., St. Catharines, Canada. E-mail: tdudding@brocku.ca; Tel: +1-905-688-5550 ext. 340
First published on 20th November 2015
The synthesis of Mosquito Oviposition Pheromones (MOP) (5R,6S)-5-acetoxy-6-hexadecanolide and its unnatural (5R,6R)-diastereomer in 68% and 54% overall yield by a route involving an organocatalyzed epoxidation of naturally occurring cis-5-hexadecenoic acid and diastereodivergent esterification is reported. The investigation of a dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformation (DYKAT) as an alternate strategy for preparing the target MOPs is also discussed, however this approach was unsuccessful due to the formation of a ketone by-product that inhibited the lipase mediated acetylation step of the DYKAT process.
Notwithstanding, efforts to implement the widespread use of MOP, especially enantioenriched materials, have been hindered by the shortage of facile synthetic methodology, which in turn has had a direct impact on the ability to acquire data from field studies using individual MOP stereoisomers.11 Accordingly, to gain access to enantioenriched samples of (−)-1 and its stereoisomers, and at the same to improve upon a previous racemic synthesis we envisioned the use of a reaction sequence involving a catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of naturally available cis-5-hexadecenoic acid 4 to afford 3 and subsequent dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformation (DYKAT) of hydroxylactone (−)-2 as key steps to the erythro-(−)-1 and threo-(−)-9 isomers (Scheme 1).12 The results of this approach are reported herein.
With respect to asymmetric epoxidation, it was foreseen that 4 would be a challenging substrate, due to the lack of functionality near the alkene.13 Nevertheless, Shi and co-workers have recently reported a class of chiral ketone catalysts (5a–c) that were able to mediate the asymmetric epoxidation of internal cis-olefins,14a,b lacking proximal functionality, with moderate to high enantioselectivity. More specifically, it was demonstrated that chiral ketone 5c catalyzed the epoxidation and subsequent lactonization of aliphatic acids, such as cis-Δ4-C12 and cis-Δ5-C12 fatty acids with moderate to high levels of stereoselection.14c The origin of stereoinduction in these epoxidations was thought to derive from two competing spiro-transition states (Fig. 1, TS1 and TS2), however only TS1 allows for favourable van der Waals contacts between the aniline para-substituent of the catalyst and the n-alkyl chain of the substrate in the transition state, as well as, stabilization resulting from aqueous solvation of the substrate carboxylate group.15 Given this precedent, it was reasoned that 4 would be an ideal substrate for asymmetric epoxidation with catalysts 5a–c. Although it was expected that 5c would generate the highest level of stereoinduction as a result of the longer hydrophobic n-alkyl chain of the catalyst as it could form a larger number of favourable van der Waals contacts which in turn would allow for greater transition state stabilization, respectively.
At the same time, it was envisioned that a DYKAT of enantioenriched secondary alcohol (−)-2, mediated by Shvo's catalyst (6),16 under the established conditions of Bäckvall et al. would afford (−)-1 (Scheme 2).17 A key question regarding this step, however, was the lipase selectivity for lactones (−)-2 and (+)-2 which was without precedent. Albeit based on previous reports, it was projected that immobilized Candida antarctica lipase A (CALA) would selectively acetylate (−)-8 over (+)-8.18 Consequently, it was anticipated a separate set of DYKAT experiments using racemate (±)-2 could be carried out as an alternative route to (−)-1, provided that selectivity for acetylation of (−)-8 was observed using enantioenriched material (Scheme 3, see ESI† for experimental details regarding (±)-2 synthesis).
Employing 5c, an initial experiment carried out under standard Shi epoxidation conditions, encouragingly provided desired epoxide 3 and hydroxylactone (−)-2 in an approximate 60
:
40 ratio with respectable optical activity (Scheme 4).14c It is perhaps worth noting that in a previous reported involving racemic epoxidation that afforded racemate (±)-2,12 it was revealed that the use of a proton shuttle, such as a catalytic amount of triethylamine facilitated the lactonization of epoxide 3 in the absence of catalyst 5c. Notwithstanding, for the case at hand it was interestingly found that no such proton shuttle was necessary to facilitate the lactonization of a crude isolate consisting of a mixture of epoxide 3, lactone (−)-2 and catalyst 5c. Conversely, purification of this mixture to remove residual catalyst resulted in a slow lactonization, requiring the addition of triethylamine to complete the lactonization in 24 h, suggesting that catalyst by-products generated under the epoxidation reaction conditions had an advantageous role in promoting intramolecular 6-exo-trig cyclization in the lactonization step.
Having an operationally simple one-pot route from 4 to (−)-2 the use of catalysts 5a,b was then investigated, which provided the key lactol intermediate, (−)-2, with lower optical activity, albeit similar overall yields (65–70%, Table 1). These results may be easily understood by invoking the abovementioned mechanistic proposal of Shi and theoretical studies by Houk and others.15 More specifically, the superior selectivity of 5c relative to 5a,b can be traced to transition state stabilization as stacking of the 4-butylaniline group of 5c atop the hydrocarbon chain of 4 in epoxidation TS1 would generate a larger number of favourable (induced dipole–induced dipole) van der Waals contacts than those present in the related epoxidation transition states for 5a,b (Fig. 1). This last conclusion necessarily followed from the larger size of the 4-butylaniline group of 5c relative to the smaller 4-methyl and 4-ethylaniline groups of 5a,b.
| Entry | Catalyst (Fig. 1) | Yielda (%) | α°b (conc.) | Absolute configurationc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Represents the isolated yield of (−)-2 and the corresponding enantiomer.b Optical rotation was obtained at 21 °C, in CHCl3 and concentrations are expressed in parenthesis in units of g/100 ml, lit.19 −10.2 (c = 0.87 g/100 ml) in CHCl3.c The absolute configuration was inferred from the sign of optical rotation, while the relative configuration was inferred from comparison of hydroxylactone (−)-2 spectra with those in literature.19 | ||||
| 1 | 5a | 65 | −6.5(1.01) | (−)-R,R |
| 2 | 5b | 68 | −8.3(1.04) | (−)-R,R |
| 3 | 5c | 70 | −9.3(0.95) | (−)-R,R |
Next with a viable synthesis to chiral threo-hydroxylactone (−)-2 established, a one-step method for the inversion of the C(6) stereocenter was needed to afford erythro-diastereomer (−)-8. As such, a preliminary model system using Shvo's catalyst (6)16a,b and racemic (±)-2 was considered, which ultimately provided a 65/35 ratio of (±)-2/(±)-8, thus demonstrating there was a thermodynamic bias for the threo-hydroxylactone under the catalytic epimerization conditions (Scheme 5).20 While this result was promising as a significant portion of the substrate was successfully epimerized to afford a mixture of both threo- and erythro-diastereomers it was foreseen that a subsequent acetylation would not be economic in mass transfer so a more desirable one-pot C(6)-inversion/acetylation approach with complete mass transfer to a single stereoisomer was alternatively investigated. This rationale prompted an examination of a DYKAT methodology using a p-chlorophenyl acetate donor (PCPA) and Novozyme N435 Candida antarctica lipase B (N435, CALB) immobilized enzyme as a potential route affording (−)-1 selectively, starting from (−)-2 (Scheme 6).21 The initial result from this enzyme mediated processes unfortunately were not encouraging, as the reaction halted at ∼30% conversion and a persistently co-eluting by-product was isolated along with the desired erythro-1 via silica gel chromatography, despite the use of several different normal mobile phases.22 Consequently, the absolute configuration and enantiomeric ratio of the acetylated product could not be determined, however 1H NMR analysis revealed erythro-1 had formed preferentially under these reaction conditions, as judged from the characteristic 13C NMR chemical shifts of C(5) and C(6) observed in the spectrum obtained from the product isolate (80.5 ppm and 74.4 ppm). Meanwhile the co-eluting by-product was suspected to be ketone 7, formed by the oxidation of alcohols 8 and 2, supported by the appearance of a characteristic multiplet for C(5) at 4.78–4.73 ppm observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of the product isolate and the appearance of a new carbonyl signal at 207.8 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum. In an attempt to further elucidate the identity of this unknown by-product, a subsequent reaction was performed using vinyl acetate (VA) and (±)-2, which is known to favour the formation of oxidized products in these types of transformations.16 To this end, a marked increase in the consumption of the starting material was observed with VA, and as expected, the isolated materials from the reaction consisted almost exclusively of the ketone by-product (Entry 1, Table 2) as supported by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and comparison with the product isolated using PCPA as a donor, thus further corroborating the tentative structural assignment of this by-product as the ketone 7. Moreover, oxidation of (±)-2 with Cornforth's reagent afforded material that was spectrometrically identical with that of by-product ketone 7 when compared with 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of product spot isolates from DYKAT trails.
| Entry | Time (days) | Atmosphere | Temperature (°C) | Donor | Lipase | Conversione (%)e | Ratio 7/1f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a All reactions were conducted as described in the representative DYKAT method outlined in the experimental section using (±)-2 as starting material. The acyl donors used were p-chlorophenylacetate (PCPA) or vinyl acetate (VA).b Reaction was conducted using 85 mg mmol−1 of immobilized lipase.c Reaction was conducted using 270 mg mmol−1 of immobilized lipase.d Reaction was initially conducted using 270 mg mmol−1 of immobilized lipase (86 mg), then 71 mg of lipase was added on days 9, 13, 15, 16.e Conversion was determined from the percentage of recovered starting material.f Estimated from 1H NMR spectrum of the product co-eluting 7 and 1. | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | N2 | 70 | VA (10 equiv.) | CALBb | 52 | 10 |
| 2 | 2 | N2 | 70 | PCPA (10 equiv.) | CALBb | 32 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 | N2 | 50 | PCPA (10 equiv.) | CALBb | 31 | 3 |
| 4 | 2 | H2 | 70 | PCPA (10 equiv.) | CALBb | 32 | 3 |
| 5 | 5 | N2 | 70 | PCPA (10 equiv.) | CALBc | 32 | 3 |
| 6 | 7 | N2 | 70 | PCPA (15 equiv.) | CALAc | 32 | 3 |
| 7 | 17 | N2 | 70 | PCPA (15 equiv.) | CALBd | 33 | 3 |
| 8 | 24 | N2 | 70 | PCPA (15 equiv.) | CALAc | 33 | 3 |
Having established the identity of the co-eluting by-product as 7 a systematic examination of reaction parameters was conducted using racemic threo-hydroxylactone (±)-2 in an attempt to improve the efficiency of the DYKAT approach (Entry 2–8, Table 2). It was initially thought that conversion was ceasing due to a thermal deactivation of the enzyme, however lowering the reaction temperature had no effect on the outcome of the reaction (Entry 3, Table 2). Similarly, running the reaction under a hydrogen atmosphere (1 atm) in order to reduce the steady state concentration of the suspected oxidized product, likewise met with no success (Entry 4, Table 2). At that stage, reasoning that the low conversion was an artefact of an unfavourable equilibrium, a series of additional conditions were then examined employing greater lipase loadings, acyl donor equivalents and reaction times, none of which had an effect on overall conversion or reduced by-product formation (Entries 5–7, Table 2). Given these failures, the N435, CALB immobilized enzyme was subsequently exchanged for a CALA enzyme immobilized on Immobead150 to probe the effect of enzyme and immobilization medium, yet disappointingly no improvement was observed (Entry 8, Table 2). Moreover, even the successive additions of fresh immobilized lipase after conversion had ceased did not result in additional conversion of starting material (Entry 7, Table 2).
Based on these results equilibrium considerations and the thermal or otherwise slow decay of enzyme could be ruled out as a cause for the observed conversion limit. Instead, it was clear from 13C NMR spectra that the by-product contained a highly deshielded carbon (207.8 ppm) that could compete with electrophilic acyl donor (∼169 ppm) for the nucleophilic serine in the active site of the lipase to form a hemiacetal complex with the enzyme. The competitive reversible inhibition of lipases by methyl-n-alkyl ketones and aldehydes has been known for some time.23 Furthermore, trifluoroketones are known to form inhibitory hemiacetal complexes in serine proteases with serine-containing catalytic triads at the active site, similar to that of CALA and CALB.24 It was therefore, suspected that 7 may play a role in the inactivation of the lipase in this reaction.
In order to determine if ketone 7 did in fact have an inhibitory effect on the lipase-mediated acetylation of alcohols 2 and 8, two parallel DYKAT reactions were then conducted under the conditions outlined in Scheme 6, with and without the addition of 7 at the beginning of the reaction. Notably, in the presence of 7 no acetylated products were formed after 12 hours, while conversely in the absence of 7 a mixture of ketone 7 and erythro-acetate 1 (4
:
1) was obtained, while the syn
:
anti ratio of recovered starting materials remained the same in both cases. Overall it would seem based on these trends and previous reports of lipase and protease inhibition by electron poor ketones that the observed inhibitory action of ketone 7, likely results from the formation of a hemiacetal between 7 and serine in the active-site of the lipases N435 and CALB. In this context, it was reasoned that the lactone moiety of 7 was capable of acting as a strong hydrogen acceptor, forming a hydrogen bonding network within the active site pocket of the enzyme, which further stabilized the inhibitor–enzyme complex, contributing to the observed drastic reduction in reaction rate at an apparently low threshold concentration of 7. Irrespective, although the reasons for the accumulation of the oxidized intermediate 7 remains unclear, as it was difficult to identify a source of stoichiometric oxidant that would allow for the accumulation of ketone 7, it is hypothesized that quinonic impurities formed by the auto or ambient oxidation of p-chlorophenol may have led to increased steady-state concentrations of 7.
Accordingly, given the synthetic shortcomings of the DYKAT approach and the successful asymmetric induction via Shi epoxidation, the asymmetric syntheses of the target compounds, (−)-9 and (−)-1, was ultimately realized by subjecting (−)-2 to a diastereodivergent esterification strategy which afforded (5R,6R)-(−)-9 and (5R,6S)-(−)-1 in 68% and 54% overall yield starting from fatty acid 4 (Scheme 7).12
Catalysts 5a–c were synthesized according to previously outlined synthetic procedures.14a,b Shi epoxidation conditions were based on published epoxidation procedures.14c Characterization data for catalysts were in good agreement with literature.14a,b
:
1 (12 ml) was added an aqueous buffer (7.9 ml, 0.1 M AcOH–K2CO3 pH 9.3 in 0.4 mM aqueous EDTA) and Bu4NHSO4 (10 mg, 0.031 mmol) with vigorous stirring. The solution was cooled in a −11 °C ice-salt bath for 15 minutes then solutions of oxone (6.3 ml, 0.20 M in 0.4 mM aqueous EDTA) and K2CO3 (6.3 ml, 0.84 M in 0.4 mM aqueous EDTA) were delivered simultaneously over 6 hours. The solution was adjusted to pH ∼2 by slow addition of 10% HCl (3.5 ml), extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 ml), dried (MgSO4), filtered and concentrated. The crude oil was dissolved in cyclohexane (14 ml) and heated under reflux for 24 hours. The resulting yellow solution was concentrated and purified by flash chromatography (Et2O) then recrystallized from hexanes to afford the target compound (−)-2 as a white solid (149 mg, 70%). Mp 65–66 °C (hexanes); lit 68–70 °C (hexanes–EtOAc);19 αD: −9.3° (c = 0.95, CHCl3); lit. −10.2° (c = 0.87)19; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.2 (m, 1H), 3.6 (m, 1H), 2.6–2.5 (m, 2H), 2.0–1.2 (m, 22H), 0.9 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.6, 83.2, 73.3, 32.6, 31.9, 29.5, 25.4, 24.2, 22.7, 18.4, 14.1; IR (KBr): ν 3554 (br), 2955, 1706 cm−1; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C16H30O3 [M + H]+ 271.2273, found 271.2262.
Characterization data were in good agreement with literature for all asymmetric epoxidation products.19
:
1 hexane–EtOAc 0.01% Et3N) to yield (−)-9 as a clear colourless oil (54 mg, 97%).; αD: –13.0° (c = 2.0, CHCl3), –14.4° (c = 2.2, CHCl3);26 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.97 (m, 1H), 4.34 (dt, J = 4.5, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.60–2.47 (m, 2H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 2.01–1.50 (m, 6H), 1.27 (s, 16H) 0.9 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.9, 170.7, 79.8, 73.9, 31.9, 29.9–29.3, 25.3, 24.1, 22.7, 21.0, 18.4, 14.1. Characterization data were in good agreement with literature.26
:
1 hexane–EtOAc 0.02% Et3N) to afford (−)-1 as a clear colourless oil (46 mg, 77%). αD: −34.1° (c = 2.0, CHCl3); lit −38.1° (c = 1.02 CHCl3);19 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.98 (m, 1H), 4.36 (m, 1H), 2.56–2.39 (m, 2H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 2.01–1.70 (m, 3H), 1.62 (m, 3H) 1.22 (s, 16H) 0.84 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.8, 170.4, 80.5, 74.3, 31.8, 29.6–29.3, 25.2, 23.4, 22.6, 21.0, 18.3, 14.1. Characterization data were in good agreement with literature.19
:
1 hexanes
:
EtOAc) and subsequently prepared for analysis by NMR in CDCl3. See ESI† for NMR spectra.
:
1 then 1
:
1 hexane–EtOAc 0.02% Et3N). Starting material was recovered as a mixture of diastereomers (22 mg, 48%). The product suspected to be 7 was isolated with trace (∼10%) acetylated starting materials as clear oil. (28 mg) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.75 (m, 1H), 2.67–2.57 (m, 4H), 2.18–2.10 (m, 4H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.25 (s, 14H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 207.8, 169.7, 83.3, 38.4, 31.9, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.3, 29.1, 24.3, 22.9, 22.7, 19.9, 14.1.
:
1 then 1
:
1 hexane–EtOAc 0.02% Et3N). Starting material was recovered as a mixture of diastereomers (59 mg, 69%). The product suspected to be 7 was isolated with ∼25% acetylated starting materials as clear oil (28 mg, see ESI† for NMR spectra).
:
1, 2 ml) and the mixture was filtered through a pad of silica (d = 0.5 cm, h = 2 cm). The clear solution was concentrated and purified by flash chromatography (5
:
1 hexanes–EtOAc). The solution was concentrated and a white solid was obtained by crystallization from cold hexanes (21 mg, 11%). Mp 26–27 °C (hexanes); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.76 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.56 (m, 4H), 2.20–2.14 (m, 1H), 1.90 (m, 3H), 1.60 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.27 (s, 14H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 207.8, 169.7, 83.3, 38.4, 31.9, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.3, 29.1, 24.4, 22.9, 22.7, 17.9 14.1; IR (KBr): ν 2923, 1725, 1745 cm−1; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C16H28O3 [M + H]+ 268.2039, found 268.2044.
:
1 as inferred from the relative intensities of the 1H NMR (C5) proton signals.Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Supporting experimental procedures and NMR spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra19306k |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |