Highly flexible, tailorable and all-solid-state supercapacitors from carbon nanotube–MnOx composite films

F. M. Guo, R. Q. Xu, X. Cui, X. B. Zang, L. Zhang, Q. Chen, K. L. Wang and J. Q. Wei*
Key Lab for Advanced Materials Processing Technology of Education Ministry, State Key Lab of New Ceramic and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China. E-mail: jqwei@tsinghua.edu.cn; Tel: +86-10-62781065

Received 19th August 2015 , Accepted 10th October 2015

First published on 13th October 2015


Abstract

Carbon nanotube (CNT) films are promising materials for constructing highly flexible composites for supercapacitor electrodes. Here, we prepared composite films with a sandwich structure and outstanding electrochemical properties by electrodepositing manganese oxide (MnOx) on the flexible CNT macrofilms. All-solid-state supercapacitors were then fabricated from the CNT–MnOx composite films using poly(vinylalcohol)–potassium hydroxide as the gel electrolyte. The supercapacitors have a high performance with a specific capacitance of 73.4 F g−1 and an energy density of 6.2 W h kg−1. The supercapacitors also exhibit high flexibility and stability under bending and kneading. When cut into small parts, the supercapacitor fragments can still work independently. The highly flexible and tailorable supercapacitors have great potential in flexible electronics in the future.


1. Introduction

Flexible and portable electronic devices, such as electronic skins, bendable displays and touch-sensitive screens, wearable solar batteries, and supercapacitors,1–5 have promising applications in the future. As an energy storage device, a supercapacitor can store energy and supply power to the electronics due to its high power density, fast charge–discharge ability, and long cycle life. According to the charge storage mechanism, supercapacitors can be classified as electric double layer capacitors (EDLCs) and pseudocapacitors. Charge separation occurs at the electrode–electrolyte interface for the EDLCs, while redox reactions occur in pseudocapacitive electrodes.6 For the potential applications in flexible devices, the supercapacitors are required to not only have high specific capacitance and energy density, but also be flexible. Recently, flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors have attracted extensive attentions because they can provide not only excellent capacitive behaviours as those of conventional supercapacitors, but also have advantages in adaptability, lightweight, and portability.4,5,7 These all-solid-state supercapacitors generally consist of flexible electrodes, gel electrolytes, a separator, and a flexible substrate. The flexibility of the supercapacitor were demonstrated by bending, twisting, winding, and even weaving. However, the flexible electronics might suffer severer deformation, or even mechanical damage. The flexible supercapacitors are also required to have high reliability when they are seriously deformed, and even accidentally cut.8

The electrodes with high electrochemical properties hold a key to fabricate high quality flexible supercapacitors. Carbonaceous materials, including activated carbon, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, and so on, have been widely investigated as electrodes in the flexible supercapacitors.4,5,9–20 Among these carbonaceous materials, CNTs with various assemblies, including powder, fibers and films, have been extensively investigated in the flexible supercapacitors owing to their outstanding properties, such as high electrical conductivity, chemical stability, mechanical properties, and large activated surface areas.5,9,10,14–19 However, the pure CNTs suffer from relative low specific capacitance due to the relative low specific surface area and EDLC energy storage mechanism. On the other hand, transition metal oxides, such as manganese oxide (MnOx), have high theoretical pseudocapacitance, but very low electrical conductivity.20–22 It might take the advantages of the high conductivity and flexibility of CNTs and high pseudocapacitance of MnOx to prepare hybrid electrodes from CNTs and MnOx, where CNTs act as conducting channel and scaffold for loading MnOx.23–27

Here, we prepared flexible CNT–MnOx composite films with excellent electrochemical properties by electrodepositing MnOx on the CNT macrofilms, and fabricated all-solid-state supercapacitors basing on the composite films. The supercapacitors shows high flexibility and stability under bending and even kneading. The composite supercapacitors can be cut into pieces which can work independently. We also demonstrated potential applications of the supercapacitors in powering a stopwatch and a LED light.

2. Experimental

Preparation of CNT–MnOx composite films

Large area CNT macrofilms were fabricated by an improved floating catalyst chemical vapour deposition method which have been described in details in our recent reports.19,28 During the growth of CNTs, xylene solution containing small amount of ferrocene and sulphur was atomized and fed into a quartz reactor. Stockings-like CNT thin films were blown out from the reactor continuously and collected by a wheel rotating perpendicularly to the gas flow, which formed macroscopic CNT films. The CNT macrofilms were purified by immersing in H2O2 (30 wt%) solution for 72 h and then in HCl (37 wt%) solution for 12 h to remove the impurities of amorphous carbon and metallic catalyst particles. After purification, the CNT films were washed in deionized (DI) water for several times and then dried at 80 °C for 1 h. The purified CNT films were cut into small pieces with desired dimensions (typically 1 × 1 cm).

The CNT–MnOx composite films were prepared by an electrodeposition method in aqueous solution consisting of 10 mM MnSO4 and 100 mM Na2SO4 at a constant potential of 1 V, where a purified CNT film was used as the working electrode, a Ag/AgCl was used as the reference electrode, and a Pt foil was used as the counter electrode, respectively.20,28 After electrodeposition, the composite film was cleaned with DI water to get rid of residual solution and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 1 h. The content of the MnOx in the composite film was calculated by measuring the weight gain before and after electrodeposition.

Fabrication of CNT–MnOx supercapacitors

All-solid-state supercapacitors were fabricated by coating the CNT–MnOx composite films with poly(vinylalcohol)–potassium hydroxide (PVA–KOH) gel electrolyte (containing 1 g PVA, 0.56 g KOH and 10 mL DI water) for several times,16 and then carefully placing the two CNT–MnOx film electrodes on top of each other on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or a polyethylene (PE) ceiling film.

Characterization

The CNT–MnOx composite films were characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, LEO 1530), X-ray diffraction (XRD, SmartLab) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, 5300ESCA), respectively. The electrochemical properties of the CNT–MnOx composite electrodes and supercapacitors were tested by using a chemical workstation (CHI 660E, Shanghai Chen Hua Co., Ltd, China), respectively. For the CNT–MnOx electrodes, cyclic voltammetry curves (CV), galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) behaviours, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were measured by using a three-electrode system in 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte, where the CNT–MnOx composite films were used as the working electrode, a Ag/AgCl was used as the reference electrode, and a Pt foil was used as the counter electrode. For the all-solid-state CNT–MnOx supercapacitors, the capacitive properties were measured by a two-electrode method.

Calculation method

For the electrodes, the capacitances are calculated from CV curves by the equation of C = ∫IdV/νV, where, I is the response current, V is the potential window and ν is the scan rate. The areal specific capacitance Ca = C/S and the mass specific capacitance is Cs = C/m, where S is the area of the film, m is the mass of the electrode.

For the supercapacitors, the capacitances C, energy density E and power density P are calculated from GCD curves using following equations:

C = I/(ΔVt) = IΔtV; Cs = C/(m1 + m2); E = CsΔV2/2; P = Et;
where, m1 and m2 are the mass of the two electrodes of the supercapacitors, Cs is the mass specific capacitance, I is the discharge current, Δt is the discharge time, ΔV is the voltage window during the discharge process after IR drop, respectively.

3. Results and discussion

After purification, the CNT films still maintain the macroscopic structure. Fig. 1a shows an optical image of a purified CNT macrofilm with 3.5 cm in width and more than 25 cm in length. The thickness of the film is several to tens of microns depending on the growing time of CNTs. The macrofilm consists of large amount of long and entangled CNT bundles which interweave with each other and form an unwoven film.19,28 The purified CNTs are very clean under SEM observation, which indicates that most of the catalyst particles are removed from the film (see Fig. S1a). The macrofilms mainly consist of single-walled and double-walled CNTs with diameter of 2–3 nm (see Fig. S1b). Thermal gravimetric analysis curve shows that there are still ∼9 wt% Fe catalyst in the samples (see Fig. S1c). The CNT films have low sheet resistances of only about 0.5–1 Ω sq−1. The purified CNT film can be bent, crumpled into a ball, and even twisted (see supporting information of Fig. S2 and Video S1). The twisted CNT films can also recover to its original state. It provides a tough and highly flexible substrate for making a flexible composite film.
image file: c5ra16771j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Optical image of a purified CNT macrofilm. SEM images of the CNT–MnOx composite films prepared with deposition time of (b) 100 s, (c) 300 s, (d) 600 s, (e) 1200 s.

Manganese oxide are deposited on the purified CNT films by an electrodeposition method, forming CNT–MnOx composite films. The content and distribution of the MnOx depend on the deposition time. Fig. 1b–e show some SEM images of the CNT–MnOx composite prepared at different deposition times. At the beginning of deposition (deposition time: 100 s), MnOx nanoflowers deposit and distribute randomly on the surface of the CNT film (Fig. S3a). The nanoflowers, containing many nanoflakes (see Fig. 1b), have uniform diameters ranging from 200 to 600 nm. As the deposition time extends to 300 s, the density of the nanoflowers on the surface of CNT film increases significantly, but the dimensions of the nanoflowers almost maintain unchanged (see Fig. S3b). It is clear from Fig. 1c that the MnOx nanoflowers deposit on the CNT bundles or are wrapped by the CNT bundles, which makes the MnOx contact with the CNT films tightly. Within the composite, the long CNT bundles form a conductive network for the MnOx nanoflowers.11 When the deposition time reaches 600 s, the CNT films were almost fully covered by a continuous film of the MnOx nanoflowers from both sides (Fig. 1d and S3c). After that, the MnOx deposit among the MnOx nanoflowers and form a uniformed layer of MnOx nanoflakes (Fig. 1e and S3d). The loading of MnOx in the composite increases as the deposition time extends, which ranges from ∼62 to ∼95 wt% for the deposition time varies from 100 s to 2400 s (see supporting information of Table S1). It is noted that the MnOx deposit on the both surfaces of the CNT film, which indicates that the CNT–MnOx composite have sandwich structure when the CNT film is fully covered by MnOx.

The composites with proper surface area and suitable pore size distribution are favourable for using as electrode materials. The specific surface area of the CNT–MnOx composite films were measured by using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the corresponding pore size distribution was obtained by employing the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method (see Fig. S4). The purified CNT film has moderate specific surface area of 159.4 m2 g−1, and a broad pore size distribution from 4 to 90 nm. The CNT–MnOx films prepared at deposition time of 600, 1200 and 2400 s have specific surface area of 156.7, 154.6 and 140.9 m2 g−1 (Fig. S4a), and average pore size of 9.9 nm, 3.9 nm and 3.8 nm (Fig. S4b), respectively. The specific surface area of the CNT films decrease slightly after deposition of MnOx, but the pore size distribution decreases and narrows significantly. The CNT–MnOx composite films still have abundant pores for electrolyte in the supercapacitors.21

X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra are used to determine the structure and the state of the MnOx. There are three evident peaks centred at 38°, 44.3° and 64.5° in the XRD patterns of the CNT–MnOx composite, respectively (Fig. 2a). These peaks do not fit with the crystalline structure of either MnO2 or Mn2O3 quite well.21,25,29 The Mn 2p XPS spectrum in Fig. 2b shows two prominent peaks centred at 642.2 eV and 653.9 eV, corresponding to the binding energy of Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2, respectively. It indicates that the manganese element has various band structure according to the Mn 2p spinning energy (11.8 eV).26,27,30 It implies that the manganese oxide here is a non-stoichiometric compound of MnOx.17


image file: c5ra16771j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) XRD pattern and (b) XPS spectrum of the CNT–MnOx films prepared with deposition time of 1200 s.

The electrochemical properties of the CNT–MnOx composite films are measured by using a three-electrode setup in 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. Fig. 3a shows a CV curve of the CNT–MnOx composite film prepared by 1200 s deposition. It has good rectangle shape. For comparison, we also measure the electrochemical properties of a purified CNT film at the same conditions. The areal capacitance of the CNT–MnO2 composite electrode reaches 174 mF cm−2 (173.7 F g−1) at 10 mV s−1 and the purified CNT film was about 5 mF cm−2 (17.3 F g−1) at scan rate of 10 mV s−1. The increase of the areal capacitance of the CNT–MnOx composite derives from the pseudocapacitance of the MnOx.20,27,30 The impedance spectra are tested in the frequency range of 0.01 to 1 MHz. The Nyquist plots in Fig. 3b show that the curve of the CNT–MnOx is almost vertical to the imaginary axis at low frequency region, while the purified CNT film shows a finite slope. From the high frequency range, the equivalent series resistance (ESR) is 7.7 Ω for the CNT–MnOx film electrode, while it is 6 Ω for the purified CNT electrode (inset of Fig. 3b). The interface charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the CNT–MnOx composite film from the semicircle is 4.5 Ω, which is lower than that of CNT film (5.8 Ω). The relative low Rct of the CNT–MnOx derives from enhance of affinity with the Na2SO4 electrolyte. Nyquist plots and Bode plots (Fig. S5 and Table S2) of composites at different deposition times show that, Rct, high frequency resistance (HFR) and time constant increase as the deposition time increase. Fig. 3c shows the CV curves of the CNT–MnOx electrode at various scan rates. The CV curves of the CNT–MnOx composite have nearly rectangular shapes at scan rates ranging from 10 to 100 mV s−1, showing a good capacitance retention. The composite electrode also has good linearity and symmetry from 0.5 to 5 A g−1 in the GCD curves (Fig. 3d). The CNT–MnOx electrodes are stable in the cycling CV test (Fig. 3e). It shows that the electrode had retained 97.9% of the original specific capacitance after 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 cycles at 100 mV s−1. The CV curves of the 1000th and 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000th test almost overlap with that of the original test (see inset of Fig. 3e).


image file: c5ra16771j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Electrochemical properties of the purified CNT film and CNT–MnOx composite film electrode (deposition time: 1200 s) in 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution electrolyte. (a) CV curves at 10 mV s−1. (b) Nyquist curves of pure CNT and CNT–MnOx composite. (c) CV curves at different scan rates. (d) GCD curves at current density ranging from 0.5 to 5 A g−1. (e) Cyclic stability at 100 mV s−1. (f) Areal capacitance depend on the deposition time at various scan rates.

Because of its high specific capacitance and very low conductivity, MnOx in the composite impact the electrochemical properties from two aspects: improving capacitance and reducing capacitance retention rate. Fig. 3f shows the plots of the areal capacitances depending on the deposition time of MnOx at various scan rates. It is clear that the areal capacitance of the CNT–MnOx composite electrode increases significantly as the deposition time prolongs, due to increase of the content of MnOx. The areal capacitance reaches to 366 mF cm−2 at a deposition time of 2400 s at 5 mV s−1, which is twice as high as that with a deposition time of 1200 s (185 mF cm−2). This is owing to the pseudocapacitance of MnOx loaded on the composite electrodes. On the other hand, the capacitance retention rate decreases evidently as the deposition time prolongs. The capacitance retention rate (see Fig. S6) is about 68% when the scan rate increases from 5 to 50 mV s−1 for the electrode with a deposition time of 1200 s, but it drops to only 54% for the electrode with a deposition time of 2400 s because of the low electrical conductivity of MnOx.

We also provided the CV curves of the CNT–MnOx electrodes prepared at various deposition times in Fig. 4. The CV curves remain good rectangular shape for the samples prepared with deposition time of 300 and 600 s (Fig. 4a and b), but the CV curves deviate severely from the rectangular shape for the electrode with deposition time of 2400 s (Fig. 4c). These CV curves indicate that the resistances of the electrode increase as deposition time prolongs, resulting in poor electrical conductivity and capacitive properties. By combining consideration of areal capacitance and capacitance retention rate, we choose 1200 s as the best deposition time.


image file: c5ra16771j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 CV curves at various scan rates of the CNT–MnOx composite prepared at different deposition times. (a) 300 s, (b) 600 s, (c) 2400 s.

We fabricate symmetric and all-solid-state supercapacitors on flexible PET substrates by using the CNT–MnOx composite films as electrodes, and PVA–KOH gel electrolyte as binders and separators. The electrochemical performances of the supercapacitors are similar to those of the electrodes in aqueous electrolyte. Fig. 5a is the CV curves of a CNT–MnOx supercapacitor, showing good rectangular shapes at scan rates ranging from 10 to 100 mV s−1. The GCD curves in Fig. 5b also shows good triangle shape for current density varying from 0.5 A g−1 to 4 A g−1, showing a relative low ESR of the supercapacitor. The supercapacitor has high performance with a high specific capacitance of 73.4 F g−1 (corresponding to 293 F g−1 for electrode), an energy density of 6.2 W h kg−1, and a power density of 0.2 kW kg−1 at 0.5 A g−1, respectively. At high current density of 4 A g−1, the supercapacitor still has a specific capacitance of 50.9 F g−1, an energy density of 2.8 W h kg−1, and a power density of 1.3 kW kg−1. The energy density and power density are close to the best values reported previously.16,31–33 The Nyquist plot shows that the device has an ESR of 12.4 Ω at high frequency (inset of Fig. 5c) and a line with a finite slope at low frequency (Fig. 5c), which indicates a low diffusive resistance for cation intercalation/de-intercalation.34 The supercapacitor is also very stable during the cyclic test. The capacitance has 90.4% retention after 1000 cycles during cyclic voltammetry test at 200 mV s−1 (see Fig. 5d).


image file: c5ra16771j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Capacitive performance of the supercapacitors using CNT–MnOx as electrodes (deposition time: 1200 s) and PVA–KOH as gel electrolyte. (a) CV curves at various scan rates. (b) GCD curves at current density ranging from 0.5 to 4 A g−1. (c) Nyquist curves from 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz. Inset is the enlarged Nyquist curves. (d) Cyclic test at 200 mV s−1 for 1000 cycles.

The CNT–MnOx supercapacitor also exhibits good flexibility and reliability under bending. Fig. 6a shows CV curves of a supercapacitor on a 50 μm thick PET substrate being bent to series of angles (0°, 30°, 60° and 90°). These CV curves at bending angle of 30°, 60° and 90° almost overlap with each other. But the capacitance increases slightly when compared with the original state (0°), which might derive from the improvement of contact between the electrodes and electrolyte under pressure. Actually, the supercapacitor possibly undergoes deformation more than bending and curling. It might be folded, or even kneaded.4,8 Fig. 6b shows the CV curves of a CNT–MnOx supercapacitor (5 cm2 in area) on a PE ceiling film substrate. The supercapacitor can be kneaded into a ball, and then flattened to the original state (recovered) for several times. The CV curves under kneading and flattening almost maintain unchanged at high scan rate of 200 mV s−1. This shows that the supercapacitor is highly flexible and stable under large deformation. The high flexibility of the supercapacitor is owing to sandwich structure of the composite film, where MnOx distribute homogenously on the strong, tough, and highly flexible CNT macrofilms.


image file: c5ra16771j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Flexible and reliable behaviors of the CNT–MnOx supercapacitor. (a) Image and CV curves of a supercapacitor under bending to 30°, 60° and 90°. (b) Images and CV curves of supercapacitor with an area of 5 cm2 on PE ceiling film under flat and kneading state. (c) CV curves of a supercapacitor before and after being cut into two parts. The schematic shows a supercapacitor being cut into two parts.

Besides high flexibility, the supercapacitor also shows excellent reliability by cutting. Fig. 6c shows a supercapacitor being cut into two parts. The two parts of supercapacitors can work well independently (see Fig. 6c and supporting information of Fig. S7). When connected in parallel, the capacitance of the combination of two parts loses slightly (91% remain). This indicates that the CNT–MnOx composite film has stable and uniform structure which can be cut into pieces.

In order to meet the energy and power demands, sometimes, the supercapacitors are connected in series and/or in parallel.12 Here, we connect three supercapacitors in series to improve the voltage output (Fig. 7a). Each supercapacitor has a voltage window of 0.8 V. When they are connected in series, the operating voltage window reaches 2.4 V. The charge time was about 34 seconds at a current density of 5 mA cm−2 and discharge time was 32 s, almost the same with that of individual supercapacitor (29.4 s). The energy density and power density of each capacitor was shown in Table S3. The three supercapacitors in series could power a stopwatch for more than two minutes, or a light emitting diode for more than 30 seconds (Fig. 7b and c).


image file: c5ra16771j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Demonstration of application of the CNT–MnOx supercapacitors. (a) GCD curves of an individual capacitor and three supercapacitors connected in series. Three supercapacitors in series (1 cm × 1 cm) power a stopwatch (b) and a LED light (c).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we prepare CNT–MnOx composite films with high electrochemical properties by electrodepositing MnOx on the CNT macrofilms in MnSO4 and Na2SO4 aqueous solution. All-solid-state supercapacitors are fabricated from the flexible CNT–MnOx composite films using PVA–KOH as gel electrolyte. The CNT–MnOx supercapacitors have excellent capacitive properties with high specific capacitance of 73.4 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1. The supercapacitors are highly flexible and reliable under bending or kneading. The supercapacitors can be even cut into pieces which can work well independently. The CNT–MnOx supercapacitors show great potentials in the flexible electronics in the future.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51172122) and Shenzhen Jiawei Photovoltaic Lighting Co., Ltd.

References

  1. G. Schwartz, B. C.-K. Tee, J. G. Mei, A. L. Appleton, D. H. Kim, H. L. Wang and Z. N. Bao, Nat. Commun., 2013, 4, 1859 CrossRef PubMed.
  2. X. Lee, T. T. Yang, X. Li, R. J. Zhang, M. Zhu, H. Z. Zhang, D. Xie, J. Q. Wei, M. L. Zhong, K. L. Wang, D. H. Wu, Z. H. Li and H. W. Zhu, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 102, 163117 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. Y. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, J. Nob, I. Lee, H. J. Kim, S. Choi, J. Seo, S. Jeon, T. S. Kim, J. Y. Lee and J. W. Choi, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 5753 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. X. Zang, Q. Chen, P. X. Li, Y. J. He, X. M. Li, M. Zhu, X. Li, K. L. Wang, M. L. Zhong, D. H. Wu and H. W. Zhu, Small, 2014, 10, 2583 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. C. Z. Meng, C. H. Liu, L. Z. Chen, C. H. Hu and S. S. Fan, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 4025 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. J. R. Miller and P. Simon, Science, 2008, 321, 651 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. D. P. Dubal, J. G. Kim, Y. Kim, R. Holze, C. D. Lokhande and W. B. Kim, Energy Technol., 2014, 2, 325 CrossRef PubMed.
  8. H. Wang, B. W. Zhu, W. C. Jiang, Y. Yang, W. R. Leow, H. Wang and X. D. Chen, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 3638 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. X. M. Ma, L. H. Gan, M. X. Liu, P. K. Tripathi, Y. H. Zhao, Z. J. Xu, D. Z. Zhu and L. W. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 8407 CAS.
  10. M. X. Liu, J. S. Qian, Y. H. Zhao, D. Z. Zhu, L. H. Gan and L. W. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 1151 Search PubMed.
  11. L. L. Zhang and X. S. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2520 RSC.
  12. X. Xiao, T. Q. Li, Y. Gao, H. Y. Jin, W. J. Ni, W. H. Zhan, X. H. Zhang, Y. Z. Cao, J. W. Zhong, L. Gong, W. C. Yen, W. J. Mai, J. Chen, K. F. Huo, Y. L. Chueh, Z. L. Wang and J. Zhou, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 9200 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. K. X. Sheng, Y. Q. Sun, C. Li, W. J. Yuan and G. Q. Shi, Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, 247 Search PubMed.
  14. Y. W. Cheng, S. T. Lu, H. B. Zhang, C. V. Varanasi and J. Liu, Nano Lett., 2012, 12, 4206 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. D. H. Zhang, M. H. Miao, H. T. Niu and Z. X. Wei, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 4571 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. C. Choi, J. A. Lee, A. Y. Choi, Y. T. Kim, X. Lepró, M. D. Lima, R. H. Baughman and S. J. Kim, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 2059 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. J. H. Kim, K. H. Lee, L. J. Overzet and G. S. Lee, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 2611 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. W. Chen, R. B. Rakhi, L. B. Hu, X. Xie, Y. Cui and H. N. Alshareef, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 5165 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. S. Q. He, J. Q. Wei, F. M. Guo, R. Q. Xu, C. Li, X. Cui, H. W. Zhu, K. L. Wang and D. H. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 5898 CAS.
  20. L. Hu, W. Chen, X. Xie, N. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Wu, Y. Yao, M. Pasta, H. N. Alshareef and Y. Cui, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 8904 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. W. F. Wei, X. W. Cui, W. X. Chen and D. G. Ivey, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1697 RSC.
  22. V. Subramanian, H. W. Zhu, R. Vajtai, P. M. Ajayan and B. Q. Wei, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 20207 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. H. Zhang, G. P. Cao, Z. Y. Wang, Y. S. Yang, Z. J. Shi and Z. N. Gu, Nano Lett., 2008, 8, 2664 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Y. Hou, Y. W. Cheng, T. Hobson and J. Liu, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 2727 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. S. L. Chou, J. Z. Wang, S. Y. Chew, H. K. Liu and S. X. Dou, Electrochem. Commun., 2008, 10, 1724 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. J. Yan, Z. J. Fan, T. Wei, J. Cheng, B. Shao, K. Wang, L. P. Song and M. L. Zhang, J. Power Sources, 2009, 194, 1202 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. S. W. Lee, J. Kim, S. Chen, P. T. Hammond and Y. Shao-horn, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 3889 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. R. Q. Xu, J. Q. Wei, F. M. Guo, X. Cui, T. Y. Zhang, H. W. Zhu, K. L. Wang and D. H. Wu, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 22015 RSC.
  29. L. L. Peng, X. Peng, B. R. Liu, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie and G. H. Yu, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 2151 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. M. Toupin, T. Brousse and D. Bélanger, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 3184 CrossRef CAS.
  31. H. Xia, J. K. Feng, H. L. Wang, M. O. Lai and L. Lu, J. Power Sources, 2010, 195, 4410 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. J. Ren, L. Li, C. Chen, X. L. Chen, Z. B. Cai, L. B. Qiu, Y. G. Wang, X. R. Zhu and H. S. Peng, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 1155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. C. Y. Guo, H. Li, X. Zhang, H. H. Huo and C. L. Xu, Sens. Actuators, B, 2015, 206, 407 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. W. F. Wei, X. W. Cui, W. X. Chen and D. G. Ivey, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 15075 CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra16771j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.