DOI:
10.1039/C5RA15146E
(Paper)
RSC Adv., 2015,
5, 77437-77442
Vertically aligned carbon nanotube@MnO2 nanosheet arrays grown on carbon cloth for high performance flexible electrodes of supercapacitors†
Received
30th July 2015
, Accepted 7th September 2015
First published on 7th September 2015
Abstract
Vertical alligned carbon nanotube@MnO2 (VACNT@MnO2) arrays grown on carbon cloth were prepared as high performance flexible electrodes for supercapacitors. VACNTs first grew on carbon cloth with the method of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) to obtain firm connection between CNTs and carbon cloth, and δ-MnO2 nanosheets were deposited on the surface of VACNTs to form a VACNT@MnO2 core–shell structure. The VACNT@MnO2 on carbon cloth (VACNT@MnO2/CC) exhibited a remarkable specific capacitance (235 F g−1 at the scan rate of 2 mV s−1 based on the total mass of VACNTs and MnO2), an excellent rate performance with a specific capacitance of 188 F g−1 at 100 mV s−1 and a stable cycling ability (nearly 100% retention after 5000 charge/discharge cycles at 5 A g−1). The fabricated symmetric supercapacitor from the self-supported VACNT@MnO2/CC without any additive reagents had the same electrochemical energy storage performance when this supercapacitor was bent 180°, revealing the excellent flexibility of our prepared flexible electrodes. The excellent performances in electrochemical properties and flexibility mainly originated from a strong mechanical coupling between CNTs and CC as well as sufficient contact between the electrolyte and the surface of MnO2 nanosheets in such an arrayed structure.
Introduction
To develop high performance flexible supercapacitors is of great importance for meeting the energy demands for future wearable electronic devices.1–6 The parameters of supercapacitors including specific capacitance, energy density, power density, rate capacitance, and cycling life are key factors influencing the practical applications of supercapacitors, especially for flexible supercapacitors. Pseudocapacitors as a kind of supercapacitor typically have higher specific capacitance than that of electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) because the electrode materials for pseudocapacitors, such as metal oxides of RuO2, MnO2 and NiO, store electric energy with redox reactions and have high theoretical capacitances.7–10 However, except for RuO2, most of metal oxides for the electrode of pseudocapacitors have poor conductivities, which leads to the limited specific capacitances are observed during charge–discharge process because the redox reactions of these metal oxides only occur on their shallow surfaces.11–14 To solve this problem, some conductive materials, such as conductive polymers, graphene, and CNT, have been used to corporate with these metal oxides, and the performance of the metal oxide-based supercapacitors can be enhanced through this route.15–21
MnO2 is a kind of promising electrode material for supercapacitors with large theoretical specific capacitance (1370 F g−1), natural abundance, low cost and environmental friendliness, thus to develop MnO2-based flexible supercapacitors is highly desirable. The contributions to increase the conductivity of MnO2 materials have been made. For example, Feng et al. used CNTs and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) to enhance the conductivity of MnO2 and the enhanced electrode performance was obtained.22 Li's group reported the high specific capacitance of flexible MnO2-based electrode with the addition of the highly conductive Zn2SnO4.23 Besides the addition of conductive materials in the MnO2-based electrode to improve its specific capacitance, the morphology of MnO2 is also an important factor.24–27 MnO2 nanosheet is a good choice to enhance its specific capacitance because this kind of morphology facilitates the redox reaction of MnO2.28,29 Furthermore, the flexible substrates, such as carbon cloth and carbon fiber papers, are promising for fabrication of flexible electrodes in supercapacitors because of their excellent conductivity and flexibility.30–32 However, the efficient combination between flexible substrates and MnO2-based electrode is necessary to resist bending activity during the practical applications, in order to avoid the resulted capacitance decaying and lifetime shortening of flexible supercapacitors.
Based on above consideration, a new route to prepare the flexible MnO2-based electrode for supercapacitors was set up, which included the growth of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (VACNTs) arrays on carbon cloth and the subsequent deposition of δ-MnO2 nanosheets on CNTs (Scheme 1). The grown VACNTs arrays played double roles of support and conductive materials for MnO2, which also made the flexible electrode robust. This flexible electrode exhibited high specific capacitance, high rate capacitance and excellent cycling performance according to our measurement results.
 |
| Scheme 1 The preparation route of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes@MnO2 arrays over carbon cloth. | |
Results and discussion
Carbon cloth (CC) was used the flexible current collector for supercapacitors in our work. The carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were grown on CC to bridge MnO2 and CC for two reasons; one is to obtain firm connection between current collectors and active materials, and another is that CNTs play the role of conductive channels. The uniform arrangement of CNTs arrays had vacancy to allow the deposition of active materials for supercapacitors. Fig. 1 shows the SEM images of the as-prepared VACNTs-arrays and VACNTs@MnO2 grown on carbon cloth (CC). The vertically aligned CNTs arrays on the CC can be clearly seen in Fig. 1a and b. The diameters and lengths of most of the CNTs are in the range of 105–130 nm and 2–5 μm, respectively. Fig. 1c and d demonstrate the morphologies of the composite VACNTs@MnO2 on CC obtained by treating VACNTs on CC with 10 mM KMnO4 aqueous solution at 180 °C for 30 minutes. It can be clearly observed that the ultrathin MnO2 nanosheets formed a layer of porous three-dimensional networks on the surfaces of the CNTs. The production of the MnO2 nanosheets on the CNTs probably mainly resulted from the chemical reaction between KMnO4 and the amorphous carbon formed on the CNT surfaces.33 Because we observed amorphous carbon of about 1 nm thickness on the surface of CNT in the high-resolution TEM image (Fig. S1a†). The strong D peak in Raman spectra of the CNTs (Fig. S1b†) also indicated the existence of amorphous carbon.
 |
| Fig. 1 (a) The SEM image of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (VACNTs) grown on carbon cloth; (b) the enlarged image of (a); (c) the SEM image of VACNTs@MnO2 on CC; (d) the enlarged image of (c). | |
The prepared VACNTs@MnO2 composite was further characterized by TEM (Fig. 2). The structure of porous MnO2 wrapped CNT can be seen in Fig. 2a. The average thickness of the MnO2 nanosheets composed shell was about 60 nm. The element mapping (Fig. 3c–e) in the region of Fig. 3b demonstrates the distribution of various elements C, O, and Mn in the composite, indicating the formation of the VACNTs@MnO2 core–shell nanostructure. These elements can also be observed in the EDS spectrum of Fig. S2.† Fig. S3† shows a high-resolution TEM image of the MnO2 nanosheets, and the nanosized MnO2 crystals can be observed. The inset in Fig. S3† provides selected area electronic diffraction (SAED) pattern of the strip area. The atomic layer inter-distance was measured to be about 0.7 nm, belonging to that of (001) planes for δ-MnO2. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the VACNTs@MnO2 composites also confirmed the presence of crystalline δ-MnO2 (Fig. S4†). A broad weak peak around 37° in XRD can be indexed to δ-MnO2 (111) planes (JCPDS 42-1317).
 |
| Fig. 2 (a) The TEM image of VACNTs@MnO2; (b) the STEM image of VACNTs@MnO2; the element mapping of (c) C, (d) O, and (e) Mn in the selected area in (b). | |
 |
| Fig. 3 The XPS spectra of (a) Mn2p and (b) O1s for the VACNTs@MnO2 composite. | |
To know the chemical component and surface chemical states of the VACNTs@MnO2 composite on CC, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement was carried out. Fig. 3a and b display the Mn2p and O1s spectra for the composite, respectively. The Mn2p spectrum presents two main peaks locating at 642.1 and 653.7 eV, being assigned to Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2 for Mn4+ in MnO2, respectively. Meanwhile, the signals of Mn3+ and Mn5+ species can also be observed in the spectrum. In the O1s region, there have three peaks with the binding energies of 529.9, 530.8 and 531.8 eV. The sharp peak located at 529.9 eV is for O element in Mn–O–Mn oxide, other two side peaks at 530.8 and 531.8 eV correspond to O element in hydroxide (Mn–O–H) and water (H–O–H).
Electrochemical performance of the VACNTs@MnO2 composite on CC (VACNTs@MnO2/CC) electrodes was explored in three-electrode system and two-electrode system, respectively. The VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode can be directly used as a working electrode without any additive reagents, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference and a platinum foil as a counter-electrode in the three-electrode system, respectively. For comparison, a VACNTs/CC electrode was also employed as a reference work electrode to detect electrochemical properties under the same conditions. Typically, the loading mass of CNT on carbon cloth for the measurements was 0.06 mg cm−2, and that of MnO2 was 0.20 mg cm−2 in our tested electrodes.
Fig. 4a shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves for the VACNTs@MnO2/CC and CNTs/CC electrodes in 1.0 M Na2SO4 electrolyte between 0 and 0.8 V (vs. SCE) at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1; the CNTs/CC electrode presented a much far lower specific capacitance (3.1 F g−1 at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1, Fig. S5†) than that of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode (234 F g−1 at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1, based on the total mass of CNTs and MnO2). Fig. 4b shows the typical CV curves of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode at different scan rates ranging from 2 to 100 mV s−1. Quasi-rectangular shapes for all CV curves at different scan rates indicated ideal pseudo- and reversible capacitor behavior in the voltage window of 0–0.8 V versus SCE. It's worth mentioning that the specific capacitance at 2 mV s−1 (235 F g−1) was nearly same as that at 5 mV s−1. When the scan rate was 100 mV s−1, the SC of the electrode reached 188 F g−1. Fig. 4c demonstrates the influence of current density on the measured specific capacitance (SC) of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode. A high SC of 263 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 can be obtained. It can reach 198 F g−1 even at a high current density of 20 A g−1, exhibiting a better SC than reported data concerning the MnO2–CNTs electrodes.20,21,34 Though the SC of VACNTs@MnO2/CC is lower than some reported data,21,22 the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode showed a more preferable rate capability than the previously reported results.35–37 The inset in Fig. 4c are the galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves at different current density from 0.5 to 20 A g−1, in which all the curves show a good linear symmetry, implying a good electrochemical reversibility and capacitive performance. Fig. 4d presents the cycling performance of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode at a large current density of 5 A g−1. The capacitance retention was nearly 100% at room temperature even after 5000 cycles, strongly evidencing the excellent long-term cycle stability and reliability of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode.
 |
| Fig. 4 (a) CV curves of the VACNTs/CC and VACNTs@MnO2/CC at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1; (b) CV curves of VACNTs@MnO2/CC at different scan rates ranging from 2 to 100 mV s−1; (c) specific capacitance of VACNTs@MnO2/CC as a function of current densities; (d) the cycling performance of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode under the current density of 5 A g−1, the inset presents the last ten cycles curves. | |
Furthermore, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was employed to detect the properties of charge and ion transport in the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode. Fig. 5 shows a Nyquist plot for the electrode. The EIS data in the Nyquist plot of Z′′ versus Z′ shows a nearly linear dependence. The slope of the line indicates the fast diffusive behaviours of the electrolyte in electrode pores and ions in active materials. The equivalent series resistance (ESR) for the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode was 3.3 Ω obtained from the Nyquist plot.38,39 The ESR can also be estimated as 3.8 Ω by IR drops (Fig. S6†) in Fig. 4c inset, which was very close to that from the Nyquist plot.
 |
| Fig. 5 Nyquist plot of VACNTs@MnO2/CC tested from 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz with the amplitude of 5 mV. The inset is the enlarged figure of the Nyquist plot. | |
The symmetric supercapacitors based on the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrodes with aqueous Na2SO4 solution as electrolyte were assembled for the cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge–discharge measurements. Fig. 6a shows the typical CV curves at different scan rates from 2 to 100 mV s−1. Similar to three-electrode system, all of CV curves show the quasi-rectangular shapes at different scan rates, suggesting ideal pseudo- and reversible capacitor behavior in the voltage window of 0–0.8 V. Fig. 6b presents the SCs of the supercapacitor at various current density from 0.5 A g−1 to 20 A g−1. The SC of 203.8 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 for symmetric supercapacitor can be obtained. Although the value of SCs at 0.5 A g−1 was lower than that in three-electrode system, the rate capacitance of this symmetric supercapacitor was better than that in three-electrode system. The specific capacitance can reach about 182 F g−1 at 20 A g−1, holding the capacitance retention of 90% when the current density increased for 40 times.
 |
| Fig. 6 (a) CV curves of VACNTs@MnO2/CC at different scan rates ranging from 2 to 100 mV s−1; (b) specific capacitance of VACNTs@MnO2/CC as a function of current densities, and the inset presents GCD curves from 0.5 A g−1 to 20 A g−1. | |
To illustrate the flexibility of our VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode, a all-solid-state flexible supercapacitor (ASFS) (area was ∼1.2 cm2) based on this electrode was assembled; two pieces of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrodes were separated by a PVA–LiCl gel. Fig. 7 shows the CV curves of this flexible device at the original state and the deformation angle of 180° at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. It can be seen that even if this flexible supercapacitor was bent for 180° the significant differences between its electrochemical behaviour and the original sample's behaviour cannot be found, revealing that the device possessed excellent electrochemical stability and deformation endurance. In addition, we tried the possibility of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC-based flexible supercapacitor acting as power source for a LED light. Three ASFS in series can drive the LED red light after they were charged under the potential of 1.7 V for 8 seconds (Fig. S7†).
 |
| Fig. 7 CV curves of flexible supercapacitor based on VACNTs@MnO2/CC at 0° and 180° deformation at 50 mV s−1. | |
The high performance of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode highly depended on its special structure. Because of the small thickness and the porosity of MnO2 nanosheets as well as the arrayed structured of VACNTs@MnO2/CC, the electrolyte can easily approach the surface of MnO2, thus the redox reactions of MnO2 can readily occur. On the other hand, the VACNTs connecting MnO2 can transport the electrons for the redox reactions of MnO2, which further increased the rate capacitance of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode. As a result of the good reversibility of VACNTs@MnO2/CC's redox reactions, the excellent cycling performance can be observed. The growth of CNTs on CC also played an important role in determining the good flexibility of the VACNTs@MnO2/CC electrode because of the firm connection between CNTs and CC.
Experimental
Materials and methods
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade without further purifications. VACNTs arrays were grown on CCs (∼2 × 2 cm2) using a DC–biased plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) system (AIXTRON) according to previous procedures.40–43 Firstly, 10 nm thick Ni film was sputtered on the CCs by e-beam vapor system (Edwards BOC 500). After that, NH3 gas (99.99%, at 200 sccm) was introduced in the PECVD reaction chamber heated to 750 °C while holding for 10 min at a pressure of ∼12 mbar, then the system was cooled to 720 °C and C2H2 gas (99.99%, 60 sccm) was inlet at a pressure of ∼12 mbar. The deposition time was 35 min. After growth, the VACNTs-modified CCs were directly transferred into a 40 mL Teflon-sealed autoclave containing 35 mL 10 mM of KMnO4 solution for growth of MnO2 nanosheets. The autoclave was sealed and put into an oven and kept at 180 °C for 30 min. After the reaction completed, the autoclave was taken out and cooled down quickly to the room temperature by cooling water. Finally, the VACNTs@MnO2/CC was taken out, rinsed with copious pure water and ethanol, and dried at 120 °C for 30 min. Mass of the VACNTs@MnO2 thin film can be calculated by measuring the mass difference between the CC and VACNTs@MnO2/CC.
Characterizations
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained by using a FEI, NOVA NanoSEM430 microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations were performed on Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN instrument operated at 200 kV. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected using a Rigaku, Smartlab X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154178 nm). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were measured using an ESCALab 250 electron spectrometer from Thermo Scientific Corporation.
Electrochemical measurements
The electrochemical performances of the CNTs-modified CC and VACNTs@MnO2/CC were carried out on VMP3 Potentiostat Galvanostat (EG&G, Princeton Applied Research) using a three-electrode cell system and two-electrode cell system, respectively. For three-electrode cell system, a Pt foil and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were served as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively, the CNTs-modified CCs or VACNTs@MnO2/CC as the working electrode, and aqueous solution of 1.0 M Na2SO4 as electrolyte at room temperature. Electrochemical measurements of two-electrode system were carried out in a Swagelok-type cell with two symmetrical VACNTs@MnO2-modified CCs electrodes with a glass fiber as separator (Whatman Cat no.1823 047), gold foils as current collector, and 1.0 M Na2SO4 as electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed in the potential range of 0 to 0.8 V (vs. SCE) at various scan rates from 2 to 100 mV s−1. Galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) measurements were carried out at different current densities varying from 0.5 A g−1 to 20 A g−1. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured with a sinusoidal wave with a 5 mV amplitude at an open circuit potential in 1.0 M Na2SO4 electrolyte with frequencies spanned from 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz. The specific capacitances were calculated from CV and galvanostatic charge–discharge curves according to the following two equations respectively:
where
is the integrated area of CV curve in one cycle, ν is the scan rate, I is the constant discharge current, Δt is the discharging time, ΔV is the potential window, and m is the mass of VACNTs@MnO2 thin film.
Conclusions
In the study, we have constructed a new structure of vertical alligned CNTs@MnO2 arrays on carbon cloth for flexible supercapacitor electrodes. The SEM and TEM characterizations of this composite reveal the presence of the core–shell structure. The electrochemical measurements of the VACNTs@MnO2 on carbon cloth shows that this electrode exhibit a remarkable specific capacitance of ∼235 F g−1 at the scan rate of 2 mV s−1, an excellent rate performance with a specific capacitance of 188 F g−1 even at 100 mV s−1 and a stable cycling ability (nearly 100% retention after 5000 charge/discharge cycles at 5 A g−1). The flexibility of VACNTs@MnO2-based symmetric supercapacitor is very good even if the superacapacitor is bent for 180°. The excellent performances in electrochemical properties and flexibility mainly originated from a strong mechanical coupling between CNTs and CC as well as the sufficient contact between electrolyte and the surface of MnO2 nanosheets in such an arrayed structure. This new VACNTs@MnO2 material on carbon cloth provides a new opportunity for constructing flexible electrical energy storage devices in near future.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the grants from National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2012CB933402) and the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China (No. 2014YQ090709). We also appreciate Dr Y.-J. Guo and Dr P. Xu for their valuable assistances.
References
- P. Simon and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 845 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. Hu, W. Chen, X. Xie, N. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Wu, Y. Yao, M. Pasta, H. N. Alshareef and Y. Cui, ACS Nano, 2011, 9, 5636 Search PubMed.
- X. L. Wang and G. Q. Shi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 790 CAS.
- S. Shi, C. J. Xu, C. Yang, J. Li, H. D. Du, B. H. Li and F. Y. Kang, Particuology, 2013, 11, 371 CrossRef PubMed.
- H. Gao and K. Lian, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 33091 RSC.
- D. S. Yu, Q. H. Qian, L. Wei, W. C. Jiang, K. L. Goh, J. Wei, J. Zhang and Y. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 647 RSC.
- S.-C. Hong, S. Kim, W.-J. Jang, T.-H. Han, J.-P. Hong, J.-S. Oh, T. Hwang, Y. Lee, J.-H. Lee and J.-D. Nam, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 48276 RSC.
- Y. Zhang and Z. Guo, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 3443 RSC.
- T. T. Liu, G. J. Shao, M. T. Ji and Z. P. Ma, Asian J. Chem., 2013, 25, 7065 CAS.
- W. Wei, X. Cui, W. Chen and D. G. Ivey, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1697 RSC.
- S. Chen, J. W. Zhu and X. Wang, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 6212 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. L. Peng, X. Peng, B. R. Liu, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie and G. H. Yu, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 2151 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. H. Yang, Y. Ding, Z. Y. Lin, Z. W. Chen, Y. Z. Li, P. F. Qiang, M. Ebrahimi, W. J. Mai, C. P. Wong and Z. L. Wang, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 731 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- Z. J. Fan, J. Yan, T. Wei, L. J. Zhi, G. Q. Ning, T. Y. Li and F. Wei, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 2366 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. H. Yu, L. B. Hu, N. A. Liu, H. L. Wang, M. Vosgueritchian, Y. Yang, Y. Cui and Z. A. Bao, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 4438 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- C. Wu, S. Deng, H. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Liu and H. Yan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 1106 CAS.
- Jaidev, R. I. Jafri, A. K. Mishra and S. Ramaprabhu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 17601 RSC.
- Z. Zhang, F. Xiao, L. Qian, J. Xiao, S. Wang and Y. Liu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2014, 4, 1400064 Search PubMed.
- G. Zhu, Z. He, J. Chen, J. Zhao, X. Feng, Y. Ma, Q. Fan, L. Wang and W. Huang, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 1079 RSC.
- Y. Hou, Y. Cheng, T. Hobson and J. Liu, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 2727 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. Li, Z. A. Hu, N. An, Y. Y. Yang, Z. M. Li and H. Y. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 22865 CAS.
- P. Lv, Y. Y. Feng, Y. Li and W. Feng, J. Power Sources, 2012, 220, 160 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. Bao, J. Zang and X. Li, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 1215 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- A. A. Radhiyah, M. Izan Izwan, V. Baiju, C. Kwok Feng, I. Jamil and R. Jose, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 9667 RSC.
- F. Li, Y. Xing, M. Huang, K. L. Li, T. T. Yu, Y. X. Zhang and D. Losic, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 7855 CAS.
- Y. Jiang, X. Ling, Z. Jiao, L. Li, Q. Ma, M. Wu, Y. Chu and B. Zhao, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 153, 246 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. Feng, Z. Yan, N. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, X. Liu, Q. Fan, L. Wang and W. Huang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 12818 CAS.
- D. Guo, X. Yu, W. Shi, Y. Luo, Q. Li and T. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 8833 CAS.
- X. Wang, H. Liu, X. Chen, D. G. Evans and W. Yang, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 78, 115 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- D. Guo, Y. Luo, X. Yu, Q. Li and T. Wang, Nano Energy, 2014, 8, 174 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. Srimuk, S. Luanwuthi, A. Krittayavathananona and M. Sawangphruk, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 157, 69 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- D. L. Ji, J. H. Li, L. M. Chen, D. Zhang, T. Liu, N. Zhang, R. Z. Ma, G. Z. Qiu and X. H. Liu, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 41627 RSC.
- H. Xia, M. O. Lai and L. Lu, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 6896 RSC.
- Z. B. Lei, F. H. Shi and L. Lu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 1058 CAS.
- G. H. Yu, L. B. Hu, M. Vosgueritchian, H. L. Wang, X. Xie, J. R. McDonough, X. Cui, Y. Cui and Z. N. Bao, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 2905 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. X. Li, Y. B. Yang, E. Z. Shi, Q. C. Shen, Y. Y. Shang, S. T. Wu, J. Q. Wei, K. L. Wang, H. W. Zhu, Q. Yuan, A. Y. Cao and D. H. Wu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 5228 CAS.
- H. J. Wang, C. Peng, J. D. Zheng, F. Peng and H. Yu, Mater. Res. Bull., 2013, 48, 3389 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- R. Kötz and M. Carlen, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 2483 CrossRef.
- S. Yoon, C. W. Lee and S. M. Oh, J. Power Sources, 2010, 195, 4391 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. S. Haque, K. B. K. Teo, N. L. Rupensinghe, S. Z. Ali, I. Haneef, S. Maeng, J. Park, F. Udrea and A. I. Milne, Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, 025607 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. Jin, W. Zhou, S. Zhang and G. Z. Chen, Small, 2007, 3, 1513 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. W. Liu, J. Essner and J. Li, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 5022 CrossRef CAS.
- B. Hsia, J. Marschewski, S. Wang, J. B. In, C. Carraro, D. Poulikakos, C. P. Grigoropoulos and R. Maboudian, Nanotechnology, 2014, 25, 055401 CrossRef PubMed.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: TEM images, Raman spectra, XRD, electrochemical characterizations of CNTs/CC, IR drops in the GCD curves and the driven LED light. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra15146e |
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.