Zafar Ali,
Lei Tian
,
Panpan Zhao,
Baoliang Zhang,
Ali Nisar,
Xiangjie Li,
Hepeng Zhang and
Qiuyu Zhang*
The Key Laboratory of Space Applied Physics and Chemistry, School of Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China. E-mail: qyzhang@nwpu.edu.cn
First published on 9th October 2015
Flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres prepared by a fast solvothermal method were selected to fabricate micron-sized Fe3O4@glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) magnetic porous microspheres. The magnetic porous microspheres were endowed with appropriate specific surface area (39.54 m2 g−1) and appropriate pore diameter (16 nm), and could serve as a carrier for immobilized lipase. Meanwhile, the prepared magnetic microspheres with high saturation magnetization could realize rapid separations. After those microspheres were aminated and activated, the obtained immobilized lipase possessed high efficiency of immobilization and catalytic activity, with the optimum pH and temperature of 8.0 and 40 °C, respectively. The thermal stability of immobilized lipase was obviously exceeding free lipase.
Lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) is a significant biocatalyst which can be available for catalyzing a variety of reactions, such as esterification, transesterification, esterolysis, and it especially has an important role in the preparation of chiral drugs.7–9 However, it is sensitive to the environment for the free lipase when directly used in the catalytic process. The free lipase would be unstable and easily deactivated in alkali, acid, high temperature and organic solvents, and contaminates the products. Immobilized lipase, which can be prepared by immobilizing free lipase on a carrier by certain physical and chemical methods, not only overcomes the deficiencies of the free lipase, but also maintains the inherent biological catalytic activity. As a result, immobilized lipase has been extensively researched and extensively used in biological medicine, food, etc.2,10–12
Among the numerous carriers of immobilized lipase, magnetic composite microspheres with magnetic responsiveness are the most common choice. Firstly, magnetic microspheres are easy to modify (like the silane coupling agent) due to abundant functional groups on the surface, and good biocompatibility;13–15 for another, because of the property of rapid separation, it improves the reusability of the immobilized enzyme and reduces production costs. Tan’s group16 prepared submicron hollow Fe3O4 particles via a solvothermal method for immobilized lipase after amino functionalization. Further, Zhu et al.6 utilized succinic anhydride modified co-precipitation Fe3O4 nanoparticles to immobilize porcine pancreatic lipase. Li’s group immobilized Candida rugosa lipase (CRL) using hollow Fe3O4 nanoparticles17 and amine or acid modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles;18 the immobilized lipase revealed excellent catalytic activity and reusability. Nevertheless, the particle size of the above-mentioned Fe3O4 particles is popularly in the nanometer or submicron range. Although a relatively high specific surface area is achieved, the direct contact area with lipase is low, and binding sites are limited by the steric hindrance. Therefore, it is crucial to fabricated micron-sized hierarchical Fe3O4 porous microspheres for immobilized lipase.
In this study, micron-sized flower-like Fe3O4 porous microspheres were produced by a solvothermal method with the aftertreatment of calcination under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then, the Fe3O4 porous microspheres modified with methacryloxy propyl trimethoxyl silane (MPS) were polymerized with GMA to fabricate flower-like Fe3O4@GMA magnetic porous microspheres (MPMs) for the immobilized lipase CRL. The structure and character of the MPMs were studied in detail, and the performance of the immobilized lipase was also investigated.
The activity of immobilized lipase was monitored by titrating the fatty acid hydrolysed from olive oil according to the literature.23 The relative activity (%) was calculated as the ratio of the activity of every sample and the maximum activity of the sample.
C. The in-plane deformation vibration of C–H was at 1390 cm−1, while 1178 cm−1 and 1060 cm−1 were attributed to the Si–O–Si bond. It illustrated MPS has been modified on the Fe3O4@GMA MPMs. 1730 cm−1 belonged to the absorption peak of the carbonyl group (C
O) as shown in Fig. 1C and D. The peaks at 1149 cm−1 and 906 cm−1 were attributed to C–O–C and the epoxy group, respectively. Therefore, we could confirm Fe3O4@GMA MPMs were formed with the polymerization of GMA.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 FTIR spectra of flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres (A), Fe3O4–MPS microspheres (B), Fe3O4@GMA magnetic microspheres (C) and PGMA (D). | ||
The crystal structure of the obtained magnetic porous microspheres was determined, and the XRD pattern is shown in Fig. 2. From the different intensities of the crystal diffraction peaks, it indicated the inorganic particles in the prepared Fe3O4@GMA MPMs have fine crystallinity. Compared to the standard Fe3O4 XRD card, its peak positions were basically the same, which showed the inorganic particles were Fe3O4. Therefore, combined with the FTIR analysis results, the produced magnetic porous microspheres were Fe3O4@GMA MPMs. The magnetic responsiveness of the Fe3O4@GMA MPMs is shown as the VSM curves in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3A, the maximum saturated magnetization of flower-like Fe3O4 microsphere was 61 emu g−1. The fairly low residual magnetization, coercivity, and the coincidence of the hysteresis loop reflected that the prepared flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres possessed superparamagnetic properties. After polymerization with GMA, the saturation magnetization of Fe3O4@GMA MPM was reduce to 58 emu g−1 (as shown in Fig. 3B). It revealed the prepared Fe3O4@GMA MPMs still had strong magnetic responsiveness which could play a significant role in rapid separation and reutilization.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 The magnetization curves of flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres (A) and Fe3O4@GMA magnetic microspheres (B). | ||
Fig. 4 shows the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres fabricated with different reaction times. From Fig. 4A, we can see that the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres were assembled by multitudinous crystal plates. When the reaction time was 3 h, the petals of the prepared magnetic microspheres were small and dense. Then, flower morphology preliminarily revealed. With the further reaction to 4 h, the petals gradually grew up, and stretched to form the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres. After reacting 6 h, the flower morphology disappeared. Spherical Fe3O4 particles were obtained, and their particle size was significantly reduced. So, the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres prepared at 4 h were chose to be the carriers of immobilized lipase. The TEM image in Fig. 4D further proved the flower morphology of Fe3O4 microspheres which was attributed to petal aggregation.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 SEM images of flower-like porous Fe3O4 nanoparticles prepared at 3 h (A), 4 h (B) and 6 h (C), and TEM image prepared at 4 h (D). | ||
Fig. 5 is the SEM and TEM images of prepared flower-like Fe3O4@GMA MPMs. From Fig. 5A, when the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres were polymerized with GMA, Fe3O4@GMA MPMs still have the fine flower morphology, just the surface was more cluttered and rough. It illustrates that the prepared magnetic porous microspheres possessed shape retention, and were suitable for immobilized lipase. In Fig. 5B, Fe3O4 microspheres were successfully coated by GMA. Poly(GMA) was a thin layer which did not destroy the pore performance of the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres.
To analyze the pore performance and specific surface area of the magnetic microspheres, Fig. 6 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption curves of the flower-like Fe3O4 microspheres before and after polymerization. From Fig. 6A and B, both flower-like Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@GMA presented a hysteresis loop which belonged to the H3 type. It revealed that the pores of prepared microspheres were slit pores piled up by plate-like particles, which were consistent with the results observed in the SEM images. Fig. 6C shows the pore size distributions of the two kinds of microspheres were relatively wide. This was beneficial to degrade the mass transfer resistance of the substrate after immobilization of lipase. From the adsorption–desorption isotherms, the BET specific surface areas of prepared flower-like Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@GMA MPMs were 45.17 m2 g−1 and 39.54 m2 g−1, respectively. And average pore sizes were 16.08 nm and 15.99 nm. The above results indicated flower-like Fe3O4@GMA MPMs not only possessed an appropriate specific surface area, but also appropriate pore diameter, which were an excellent carrier for immobilized lipase.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm curves of Fe3O4 (A), Fe3O4@GMA magnetic microspheres (B) and their pore size distributions (C). | ||
| Dosage of GMA | 0.5 g | 1.0 g | 1.45 g |
| Immobilization efficiency | 27.99 mg g−1 | 133.32 mg g−1 | 157.52 mg g−1 |
Considering the immobilized lipase required a suitable environment to develop its optimal catalytic performance, we examined the influence of the pH and temperature of the system on the activity of immobilized lipase, as shown in Fig. 7 and 8. The pH value directly decided the surface charge distribution of lipase which affected the activity.24 Fig. 7 is the relative activity of immobilized lipase at various pH conditions compared to that at a pH of 6.0. From Fig. 7, the optimal pH was 8.0, which had far higher activity than that at other pH values.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Relative activity of different lipases at various temperature conditions compared to the activity of free enzyme at 60 °C (A). Thermal stability of free and immobilized lipase (B). | ||
Fig. 8A shows the relative activity of different lipases at various temperatures. From Fig. 8A, the optimal temperature for the immobilized lipase was 40 °C, with about 65% of the free lipase activity. In addition, the activity was higher than that of Novozym-435 in the determination of temperature. Fig. 8B shows the thermal inactivation analysis of the free lipase and immobilized lipase at 50 °C. From Fig. 8B, the activity of both free lipase and immobilized lipase declined. However, the decline extent of the free lipase was greater when compared at each test point. When incubated for 180 min, the activity of free lipase dropped to 6.3%, almost deactivated. From the thermal inactivation fitting curve, it was in accord with the two-step series-type enzyme deactivation model:
. The residual enzyme activity could be expressed as:
Residual activity (%) = α exp(−k1t) + β exp(−k2t) |
The fitting results are shown in Table 2. From Table 2, for the immobilized lipase, k1 < k2. It illustrated similarly that the stability of the immobilized lipase was better than the free lipase.
| α | β | k1/min−1 | k2/min−1 | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free enzyme | 19.2918 | 0.5385 | 0.3581 | 0.0273 | 0.999 |
| Immobilized lipase | 0.2188 | 1.4325 | 0.0097 | 0.0727 | 0.998 |
The kinetics of free lipase and immobilized lipase were explored via hydrolyzing olive oil with different initial concentrations. The Lineweaver–Burk plots are shown in Fig. 9. From Fig. 9, it is shown that the Km of free lipase and immobilized lipase were 15.4 and 3.1, respectively. And the Vmax of immobilized lipase was 2.4 U mg−1, lower than that of free lipase (16.3 U mg−1). The low Km and Vmax of immobilized lipase revealed that the affinity of immobilized lipase for the substrate was higher than free lipase. It could be attributed to the formation of oil–water by the exposure of Fe3O4 and poly(GMA). The mass transfer limitation caused by the carriers was insignificant.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |