Constructing one dimensional assembly of poly methylacrylic acid capping gold nanoparticles for selective and colorimetric detection of aminoglycoside antibiotics

Junbo Li*, Ke Zhang, Ju Liang, Wenlan Wu, Jinwu Guo and Huiyun Zhou
College of Chemical Engineering & Pharmaceutics, Henan University of Science & Technology, Luo Yang, China 471023. E-mail: Lijunbo@haust.edu.cn; Fax: +86-379-64232193; Tel: +86-379-64231914

Received 5th June 2015 , Accepted 24th July 2015

First published on 27th July 2015


Abstract

Here, a self-assembly driven colorimetric method is described for detecting aminoglycoside antibiotics (AMGs) upon nanochain formation of poly methylacrylic acid capping gold nanoparticles (PMMA-@-Au NPs). After addition of streptomycin, the development of new plasmonic coupling absorption in the higher-wavelength region, companied with a prominent color change from wine red to blue, and TEM observation clearly reveal formation of a chain-like nanostructure of PMMA-@-Au NPs. The amine-groups on the AMGs can serve as a molecular bridge for electrostatic coupling with two carboxylic acids from adjacent particles to drive PMMA-@-Au NPs with chain-like arrays, where the molecular linkers are also target analytes. The selective detection can be achieved by the UV spectra of AMGs, including gentamicin, neomycin and kanamycin, with other types of antibiotics. Finally, the interference from metal ions competition can be eliminated by adding a strong metal ion chelator such as EDTA.


Introduction

As a large group of pharmaceuticals, antibiotics drug have been widely used for the abatement of bacterial infections with humans and animals.1 Recently, animal husbandry also employed antibiotics as feed additives to prevent animal diseases in and promote growth in farm animals.2 However, abuse of antibiotics has raised public health concerns, with regard to the presence of antibiotics residues in the food chain.3,4 These residues will cause a serious threat to human health,5 such as chemical poisoning, allergic reactions, change in consumer perception of the product and the development of mechanisms of bacterial resistance. So far, various approaches and techniques have been developed for the determination of these residues in food, such as enzyme-linked immunoassay,6 high-performance liquid chromatography,7,8 and capillary electrophoresis.9 These methods have revealed several advantages, such as low detection limit and high sensitivity. However, rely on tedious sample pretreatment, special instrumentation or time-consuming procedures that limit their applications in the real-time and in site monitoring. Therefore, exploration of inexpensive, convenient and rapid method is highly desirable for use in routine assays.

Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) have raised considerable concerns for its wide application in molecule recognition due to their distinct physical and chemical properties.10–14 The unique optoelectronic properties, including higher molar absorption coefficient in visible region and the surface plasma resonance (SPR) absorption depending on particle size, distance and surrounding environment, make them as excellent platform for colorimetric detection. Moreover, the easy modified surface provides optional strategies for binding with a wide range of organic and biological ligands, and specifically and selectively interacting with target analytes.15 Commonly, the aggregation of particle triggers an obvious color change and spectrum response, which is easy for detection of target analytes by naked eyes or inexpensive instruments. The quantity of target analytes, time of response and distinctness of color change was related to the aggregate manner of Au NPs, further determining the testing sensitivity.

Recently, constructing ordered array of metal nanoparticles has become the promising strategy for developing next-generation nanotechnologies.16–18 The one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures19,20 produced an electromagnetic focusing effect caused by the plasmon coupling, which is distinct properties different from a simple collection of individual particles21,22 and achieved the potentials of isolated nanoparticles in nanoelectronics, optoelectronics, nanomagnetism and sensor devices.23–25 Self-assembly approach is an efficient and attractive methodology to create such nanomaterials via designable surface chemistry26 and reliable interactions.27,28 Especial through the electrostatic dipole interaction,29 the little amount charged molecular linker could rapidly induce ordered array of disperse Au NPs, giving rise to marked change in optoelectronic property. Accompanied the variations in absorption spectra and distinct color change of solutions, fabricating the nanostructure has been believed to be a development of chemical30,31 and biomolecular SPR32,33 sensors due to sensitive easy-to-visualize process. For example, Chen et al. employed 1D arrangement of Au NPs for colorimetric detecting Hg2+ with high reliability and excellent selectivity.34 Fernández-Lodeiro's group35 self-assembled silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and Au NPs into 1D nanochains mediated by polyamine to explore the value for colorimetric detection. In addition, the chain-like nanostructures based on polymer functional Au NPs was also prepared by us, showing a potential utility as sensor to discriminate the polyvalent anions from its corresponding monovalent anion,36 where the polyvalent anions served as molecular linkers.

Here, we further explore this self-assembling driven method for colorimetric detecting aminoglycoside antibiotics (AMGs) through fabricating nanochains of poly methylacrylic acid capped gold nanoparticle (PMMA-@-Au NPs) in aqueous solution. AMGs residues37 have been found in animal organs, milk, fruit, honey and vegetables38 because of their wide application in veterinary medicine and pesticide. Commonly, AMGs are difficult to directly detect due to lack of UV-absorbing chromophore.39 However, AMGs have many amino groups in the streptamine rings,33,40 presenting new approach to discriminate them from other types antibiotics. In this paper, the assembling PMMA-@-Au NPs particles into chain-like arrays can be driven by two amino groups of AMGs via an electrostatic dipole interaction, where AMGs is both the molecular linkers and target analytes. The process of preparing PMMA-@-Au NPs and forming chain-like nanostructure to detect streptamine is illustrated in Scheme 1.


image file: c5ra10724e-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic representation of preparing PMMA-@-Au NPs and forming a chain-like nanostructure via electrostatic dipole interaction.

Experimental section

Materials

The antibiotics gentamicin, streptomycin, neomycin, kanamycins, penicillin, tetracycline, terramycin and ilotycin were purchased from National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent. EDTA, and metal salts Pb(NO3)2 were purchased from National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent. All glassware was cleaned with freshly aqua regia and thoroughly rinsed with Milli-Q water prior to use. Au NPs were firstly prepared by using the classical citrate reduction method. PMAA-@-Au NPs was prepared by adding PMAA with a thiol end group (SH-PMAA35) into the as-prepared Au NPs solution. The detail preparation and characterization of SH-PMAA35, Au NPs and PMAA-@-Au NPs could find in our previous ref. 14. The detailed description self-assembling Au NPs and PMAA-@-Au NPs by AMGs could find in ESI.

Instrumentation

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is conducted by using a Philips T20ST electron microscopy at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Thin films are prepared by dipping a drop of the solution onto a carbon-coated copper grid and then volatilizing the solution at room temperature. UV-vis absorption spectrum is obtained using a Perkin-Elmer UV-vis spectrometer (Lambda 20). Zeta-potentials were measured using a temperature-controlled Zetasizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments. Ltd). The Au NPs and PMAA-@-Au NPs is characterized by dynamic laser scattering (DLS) for particle size analysis. DLS measurements are performed on a laser light scattering spectrometer (BI-200SM) equipped with a digital correlator (BI-9000AT) at 532 nm.

Results and discussion

Characterization of the PMMA-@-Au NPs

Au NPs were firstly prepared by reducing chloroauric acid with sodium citrate. The PMMA-@-Au NPs could be achieved in one-step process simply by adding the SH-PMMA into an Au NPs aqueous solution via Au–S bond. The UV-vis spectroscopy was used to characterize the formation of Au–S covalent bonds on the surface of Au NPs. As shown in Fig. 1A, the characteristic SPR band of Au NPs is found in the spectrum at approximate 519 nm. After addition of the PMMA, the characteristic SPR band of PMMA-@-Au NPs moves to 524 nm. The UV absorption peak has red shift of 5 nm. The slight red shift could be attributed to the change of the surface properties of Au NPs due to the chemisorption of PMMA on the surface of Au NPs, caused by the change of refractive index.30 The existence of the polymer layer around the gold core can be directly observed by TEM image (Fig. 1B). The amorphous phase of grafted PMAA chains packs on the crystal structure gold core. The core has a mean diameter of approximately 13 nm. The characterization of TGA and DLS can directly provide the information of the core–shell structure as shown in Fig. 1C and D. The average hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of the particles is approximately 28 nm, and the size distribution range is 25–34 nm. From the results of TEM and DLS, the mean length of the shell is approximately 7.5 nm. From Fig. 1D, the PMMA is found to decompose in the temperature range from 285 to 448 °C. Thus, the weight percentage of PMMA is approximately 58%. Therefore, the average grafting density of PMMA on the surface of each Au NPs is approximately 1.02 chains per nm2.36
image file: c5ra10724e-f1.tif
Fig. 1 UV-vis spectra (A) of Au NPs and PMMA-@-Au NPs, TEM (B) and DLS of PMMA-@-Au NPs (C), and TGA analysis (D) of PMMA (a) and PMMPImB-@-Au NPs (b).

Bearing two guanidinium cations in PBS buffer solution due to its pKa values up to 13.5, streptomycin can randomly associate with two carboxy groups via electrostatic interaction. The Fig. 2 shows the evolution of SPR of PMMA-@-Au NPs after the addition of streptomycin with an increasing concentration. In this case, the streptomycin adds dropwise and the spectrum is measured after 15 min incubation to ensure full interaction. With addition of streptomycin, the intensity of the transverse band at 523 nm declines. The second new SPR band in the higher wavelength region gradually appears, which attributes to the formation of aggregated nanostructures. The long-wavelength plasmon band is originated from the coupling of the plasmon resonance of neighbouring Au NPs. The intensity of the long-wavelength band increases with the increase the amount of streptomycin and finally reaches a plateau at 657 nm at 30 μL streptomycin. The longitudinal mode of plasmon oscillation is excited along with the formation of a longer chain. However, the blue suspension is observed in the solution when increase the amount of streptomycin to 35 and 40 μL, which makes the intensity of the long-wavelength band decline.


image file: c5ra10724e-f2.tif
Fig. 2 UV-vis spectra of PMMA-@-Au NPs with the addition of different volumes of streptomycin.

The negative charge of particle surface makes the particles end-on alignment due to the electrostatic repulsive interaction.41,42 The formation of the nanochain is driven by a balance between two opposite interactions.43 Their change trend can be analysed by the measurement particle surface potentials, showing in Fig. 3. From Fig. 3, the zeta-potentials of PMMA-@-Au NPs raises steadily because the addition of positive streptomycin partly neutralizes the negative charge of PMMA-@-Au NPs. The zeta-potentials rise from the original −24.2 to −1.3 mV after the addition of 35 μL of streptomycin. With an increase in the amount of streptomycin, the decreased negative zeta-potential is caused by the occurrence of electrostatic dipole interaction. The color change along with change of zeta-potentials was inserted in the Fig. 3, which can be used to indicate the change of electrostatic interaction and formation of nanochain. The electrostatic repulsive interaction makes particles disperse well and show the red color. After addition of streptomycin, the electrostatic dipole interaction promotes the formation of nanochian, generating the absorbance in higher wavelength region and making the color change from red to purple and blue. At high streptomycin concentrations, the lower electrostatic repulsive interaction leads to the formation of the close-packed nanostructures, confirming by blue suspension in solution. The distinct change of color offers a reliable visual detection for streptomycin. The recognizable concentration for streptomycin is 11.6 ppb with naked eye, which is lower than maximum residue limits (MRL) for streptomycin in milk defined by European Union, America, China, and WHO (200 ppb).44


image file: c5ra10724e-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Zeta-potentials and photos of PMMA-@-Au NPs in the presence of different volume streptomycin.

The time-dependent optical spectra (Fig. 4) were also studied by directly added the 30 μL of streptomycin into the solution of PMMA-@-Au NPs. From Fig. 4, the aggregate nanostructures can be fully assembled within 12 min and the solution keeps generally stable for days without the observation of manifest precipitation. The guanidinium group can fast bind with carboxyl group through electrostatic attraction, which provides a rapid detection for streptomycin.


image file: c5ra10724e-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Time-dependent UV-vis spectra of PMMA-@-Au NPs at various times after addition of 30 μL of streptomycin.

The TEM images of PMMA-@-Au NPs in the absence and presence of different concentrations of streptomycin clearly confirm the self-assembled process of gold nanochain formation. From Fig. 5a, the particles disperse well because of the electrostatic repulse among the carboxylate ions in absence of streptomycin as molecular linker. After added 5 μL streptomycin, the short chains of PMMA-@-Au NPs are found in the image Fig. 5b. The higher electrostatic repulsive interactions prevent the formation of long-chain structure. With the increasing amount of streptomycin in solution, the nanochains grow longer because more molecular linkers take part in self-assembly (Fig. 5c). The long chains are flexible due to a random electrostatic interaction. Continuing to increase the amount of streptomycin, as shown in Fig. 5d and e, the chains with branch and close-packed structure are observed since the continuous decrease of electrostatic repulsive interaction.


image file: c5ra10724e-f5.tif
Fig. 5 TEM images of PMMA-@-Au NPs in the absence (a) and presence of 5 μL (b), 10 μL (c), 20 μL (d) and 30 μL (e) streptomycin.

Actually, the citrate-stabilized Au NPs has been widely reported to construct multi-dimensional self-assemblies via electrostatic interaction with cationic coupling agent.45 Here, the formation of self-assembling Au NPs was also verified to visually detect streptomycin. The second new SPR band in the higher wavelength region (Fig. 6a) is observed after addition of streptomycin in the solution of Au NPs, confirming the formation of aggregated nanostructures. The longitudinal mode of plasmon band finally locates at 666 nm after adding 15 μL of streptomycin. Compared with PMMA-@-Au NPs, a little redshift plasmon band indicates a shorter distance between adjacent particles. The clear color change from red to blue can also be used for detecting streptomycin with naked eyes. However, lower intensity and wider peak suggests an unstable and irregular structure. The TEM image (Fig. 6b) reveals a part fusion of nanostructure. The nanostructures remain chain-like tendency, indicating particles coalescence occur after the electrostatic self-assembly, which attributes to ineffective protection from citrate noncovalent coating surface. The results indicate that the polymer shell not only provides functional group to interact with AMGs, but stability to prevent Au NPs from coalescence between particles.


image file: c5ra10724e-f6.tif
Fig. 6 UV-vis spectra of citrate-stabilized Au NPs with the addition of different volumes of streptomycin and TEM image of citrate-stabilized Au NPs in the presence of 15 μL streptomycin.

The others AMG, including gentamicin, neomycin and kanamycin, with several amine-groups on molecular skeleton, have potential ability to induce linear self-assembly of PMMA-@-Au NPs via electrostatic interaction. Here, we compared the UV-vis spectra of PMMA-@-Au NPs in the presence of the same concentrations of AMG and other types of common antibiotics, as shown in Fig. 7. Fig. 7a shows the UV-vis spectra of the PMMA-@-Au NPs after adding streptomycin, gentamicin, neomycin and kanamycin. From Fig. 7a, besides the transverse SPR band at 524 nm, the longitudinal SPR band at 623–662 nm is also found in those spectra, and TEM image confirming the formation of chain-like Au NPs by TEM (Fig. 1S). The protonated amino groups can also be used as the linkers among PMMA-@-Au NPs to induce a particles order aggregation. The different absorbance intensity of longitudinal SPRs maybe is caused by the number of amino group and different molecule property. All the colors of solution turn to blue, illustrating the feasibility of colorimetric detection. Fig. 7b shows the UV-vis spectra of the PMMA-@-Au NPs after addition of other types of common antibiotics, including penicillin, terramycin, tetracycline and ilotycin, etc. From Fig. 7b, the transverse SPRs remain in the same position, showing that those antibiotics lack the ability to interact with PMMA-@-Au NPs. The formation of chain-like Au NPs is induced by electrostatic dipole interaction, instead of via a hydrogen-bonding. Therefore, the self-assembly driven colorimetric method can serve to distinguish AMG from other types of antibiotics.


image file: c5ra10724e-f7.tif
Fig. 7 UV-vis spectra of the PMMA-@-Au NPs after addition of 15 μL of AMGs (a) and other types of antibiotics (b), respectively.

We have confirmed that PMMA-@-Au NPs has a strong chelation with metal ions and generates aggregation, giving rise to obvious color change.14 If the sample was mixed with metal ions, it would disturb the determination of AMGs only by naked eyes. As strong chelating agent of metal ions, EDTA has been confirmed by us that can screen the interaction of PMMA-@-Au NPs with metal ions. Taking Pb2+ as an example (Fig. 8), it makes the transverse SPR of PMMA-@-Au NPs redshift to 542 nm (Fig. 8b) and the solution turns to purple (Fig. 8b′) suspension due to an induced aggregation. After added EDTA, the UV-vis spectra of mixed solution shows a blue shift to 532 nm (Fig. 8c) and the color return to red (Fig. 8c′), indicating that the EDTA extract Pb2+ from aggregation of PMMA-@-Au NPs. Finally, the long-wavelength plasmon band appears (Fig. 8e) and the solution turns blue (Fig. 8e′) after added 10 μL or more streptomycin. The similar results are observed in other samples of AMGs, which demonstrate that the interference from metal ions to determinate AMGs can be eliminated by adding EDTA.


image file: c5ra10724e-f8.tif
Fig. 8 UV-vis spectra of PMAA-@-Au NPs (a), (a) in the presence of 400 μM Pb2+ (b), adding EDTA in (b) (c), and adding streptomycin in (c) (d) and its corresponding solution color (a′, b′, c′ and e′).

Conclusions

In summary, the self-assembly driven colorimetric method is present to detect AMGs by induced nanochain formation of PMMA-@-Au NPs. The AMGs can serve as molecular linkers to drive PMMA-@-Au NPs with chain-like arrays via an electrostatic dipole interaction, giving rise to obvious color change from red to blue for their colorimetric detection. The test method has many advantages, such as cost-effective, on-site, read-out by naked eyes and high sensitivity and selectivity, etc. Moreover, the stable chain-like nanostructure comprising drug and polymer functional Au NPs, with intriguing optics and surface properties, is worthy of further investigation for biomedical applications such as cell-imaging, photo-thermal therapy of cancer and controlled release.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51103035 and 51403055) and Scientific and Technological Projects of Henan province (132102310422).

References

  1. A. Losoya-Leal, M. C. Estevez, S. O. Martínez-Chapa and L. M. Lechuga, Talanta, 2015, 141, 253–258 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. T. Christian, R. J. Schneider, H. A. Färber, D. Skutlarek, M. T. Meyer and H. E. Goldbach, Clean: Soil, Air, Water, 2003, 31, 36–44 CAS.
  3. F. Conzuelo, M. Gamella, S. Campuzano, A. J. Reviejo and J. M. Pingarrón, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2012, 737, 29–36 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. Y. Luo, J. Xu, Y. Li, H. Gao, J. Guo, F. Shen and C. Sun, Food Control, 2015, 54, 7–15 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. J. F. Prescott, Can. Vet. J., 1999, 40, 199 Search PubMed.
  6. Y. Zhang, S. Lu, W. Liu, C. Zhao and R. Xi, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2007, 55, 211–218 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. S.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Liang and Y.-W. Chou, J. Sep. Sci., 2006, 29, 607–612 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. M. E. Dasenaki and N. S. Thomaidis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2015, 407, 4229–4245 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. M. Horká, M. Tesařová, P. Karásek, F. Růžička, V. Holá, M. Sittová and M. Roth, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2015, 868, 67–72 CrossRef PubMed.
  10. D. Liu, Z. Wang and X. Jiang, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 1421–1433 RSC.
  11. K. Ai, Y. Liu and L. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9496–9497 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. C. Radhakumary and K. Sreenivasan, Colloids Surf., A, 2014, 443, 326–330 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. P. Tiwari, K. Vig, V. Dennis and S. Singh, Nanomaterials, 2011, 1, 31–63 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. Li, C. Han, W. Wu, S. Zhang, J. Guo and H. Zhou, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 717–722 RSC.
  15. K. Saha, S. S. Agasti, C. Kim, X. N. Li and V. M. Rotello, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 2739–2779 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. S. J. Tan, M. J. Campolongo, D. Luo and W. Cheng, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6, 268–276 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. C. Hamon, S. Novikov, L. Scarabelli, L. Basabe-Desmonts and L. M. Liz-Marzán, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 10694–10703 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. S. Linic, P. Christopher and D. B. Ingram, Nat. Mater., 2011, 10, 911–921 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. S. J. Barrow, A. M. Funston, X. Wei and P. Mulvaney, Nano Today, 2013, 8, 138–167 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. Y. Liu, X. Han, L. He and Y. Yin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6373–6377 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. C. Fernández-López, L. Polavarapu, D. M. Solís, J. M. Taboada, F. Obelleiro, R. Contreras-Cáceres, I. Pastoriza-Santos and J. Pérez-Juste, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 23, 12530–12538 Search PubMed.
  22. S. Linic, U. Aslam, C. Boerigter and M. Morabito, Nat. Mater., 2015, 14, 567–576 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. T. Søndergaard, S. M. Novikov, T. Holmgaard, R. L. Eriksen, J. Beermann, Z. Han, K. Pedersen and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Nat. Commun., 2012, 3, 969 CrossRef PubMed.
  24. K. J. Savage, M. M. Hawkeye, R. Esteban, A. G. Borisov, J. Aizpurua and J. J. Baumberg, Nature, 2012, 491, 574–577 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. L. Jiang, Y. Sun, F. Huo, H. Zhang, L. Qin, S. Li and X. Chen, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 66–75 RSC.
  26. I. Tokarev and S. Minko, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 5980–5987 RSC.
  27. M. Grzelczak, J. Vermant, E. M. Furst and L. M. Liz-Marzán, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 3591–3605 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. S. Gwo, M.-H. Lin, C.-L. He, H.-Y. Chen and T. Teranishi, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 8902–8908 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. S. Si, A. Kotal and T. K. Mandal, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 1248–1255 CAS.
  30. J. A. Jenkins, Y. Zhou, S. Thota, X. Tian, X. Zhao, S. Zou and J. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 26276–26283 CAS.
  31. K.-L. Lee, P.-W. Chen, S.-H. Wu, J.-B. Huang, S.-Y. Yang and P.-K. Wei, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 2931–2939 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. X. Han, Y. Liu and Y. Yin, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 2466–2470 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. D. Perez-Fernandez, D. Shcherbakov, T. Matt, N. C. Leong, I. Kudyba, S. Duscha, H. Boukari, R. Patak, S. R. Dubbaka, K. Lang, M. Meyer, R. Akbergenov, P. Freihofer, S. Vaddi, P. Thommes, V. Ramakrishnan, A. Vasella and E. C. Böttger, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3112 Search PubMed.
  34. H. Chen, W. Hu and C. M. Li, Sens. Actuators, B, 2015, 215, 421–427 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. A. Fernández-Lodeiro, J. Fernández-Lodeiro, C. Núñez, R. Bastida, J. L. Capelo and C. Lodeiro, ChemistryOpen, 2013, 2, 200–207 CrossRef PubMed.
  36. J. B. Li, S. J. Zhang, J. Liang, W. L. Wu, J. W. Guo and H. Y. Zhou, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 7994–8001 RSC.
  37. M. S. Young, K. van Tran, E. Goh and J. C. Shia, J. AOAC Int., 2014, 97, 1737–1741 CrossRef CAS.
  38. X. Cui, P. Zhang, X. Yang, M. Yang, W. Zhou, S. Zhang, H. Gao and R. Lu, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2015, 878, 131–139 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. N. Derbyshire, S. J. White, D. H. J. Bunka, L. Song, S. Stead, J. Tarbin, M. Sharman, D. Zhou and P. G. Stockley, Anal. Chem., 2012, 84, 6595–6602 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. L. R. Schoukroun-Barnes, S. Wagan and R. J. White, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86, 1131–1137 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. X. Shen, L. Chen, D. Li, L. Zhu, H. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Xiong and H. Chen, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 8426–8433 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. C. Fang, Y. Fan, J. M. Kong, Z. Q. Gao and N. Balasubramanian, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2008, 92, 263108 CrossRef PubMed.
  43. Z. Nie, A. Petukhova and E. Kumacheva, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2010, 5, 15–25 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. N. Vragović, D. Bažulić and B. Njari, Food Chem. Toxicol., 2011, 49, 352–355 CrossRef PubMed.
  45. S. Srivastava and N. A. Kotov, Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 1146–1156 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra10724e

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.