Color-tunable emission in Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F phosphor

Liping Yiab, Jilin Zhang*ab, Zhongxian Qiuab, Wenli Zhouab, Liping Yuab and Shixun Lian*ab
aKey Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research (Ministry of Education of China), Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
bKey Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China. E-mail: chemzhangjl@hunnu.edu.cn; sxlian@hunnu.edu.cn; Fax: +86 731 88865345; Tel: +86 731 88865345

Received 15th May 2015 , Accepted 31st July 2015

First published on 31st July 2015


Abstract

In this paper, Ce3+ doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F phosphors were synthesized by a high-temperature solid-state reaction. Upon excitation at 360 nm, the emission spectra of Ce3+ doped phosphors exhibit a broad emission band peaking at 392 nm, which originates from the 5d to 4f transition of Ce3+. The Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors show strong energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+, and the emission color can be tuned from purplish blue to green by changing the Tb3+ content. The excitation band in the 300–400 nm region broadens when monitored at 541 nm compared to that monitored at 392 nm. Furthermore, the co-doping of Tb3+ facilitates the appearance of green emitting Ce3+, which originates from Ce3+ on the Ca site other than that for purplish-blue Ce3+. The relationship between the luminescence properties of Ce3+ and its coordination environments, namely, different Ca sites, is discussed based on the calculations of centroid shift and crystal field splitting of 5d energy levels of Ce3+. Results suggest that Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F phosphors may be a candidate for near-UV chip based white light-emitting diodes.


1. Introduction

White light-emitting diodes (w-LEDs) have been regarded as the new generation of illumination source due to numerous advantages, such as long lifetime, energy saving properties, environmental friendliness, etc., when they compare with traditional incandescent and fluorescent lamps.1–3 However, the commonly used w-LEDs at present, which are based on the combination of a blue InGaN LED chip and a yellow emitting Y3Al5O12:Ce3+ (YAG:Ce), have a low color rendering index (CRI, Ra < 80) and a high color temperature due to the lack of red-emitting component.4,5 These problems can be overcome by combining a near-UV LED chip with a white-emitting phosphor or blue, green and red emitting phosphors.2,6 Therefore, it is important to search for phosphors that could be excited efficiently by near-UV LEDs.

Ce3+ ion is a common activator for phosphors with intense and broad excitation and emission bands due to the allowed 4f–5d and 5d–4f transitions, respectively, which is similar to the Eu2+ ion. Furthermore, the excitation and emission bands can be adjusted by changing hosts or crystallographic sites in a host.7,8 Therefore, it is quite convenient to obtain phosphors that are suitable for near-UV LEDs by selecting a proper host. In the past year, there were several new Ce3+ doped phosphors reported, such as, BaLa2Si2S8:Ce3+,9 γ-Ca2SiO4:Ce3+,10 MSiAl2O3N2:Ce3+ (M = Sr, Ba),11 novel garnet Ca2GdZr2(AlO4)3:Ce3+,12 and Ca3−xSrxAl2O6:Ce3+ (x = 0, 1 and 2),8,13,14 etc.

Tb3+ ion is used as a green-emitting component of phosphors, which usually has an intense emission peak at ∼540 nm originating from 5D47F5 transition. However, the excitation bands in near-UV region are usually very weak due to the forbidden 4f–4f transitions. Therefore, Ce3+ and Eu2+ ions are utilized to enhance the emission intensity of Tb3+ by energy transfer.15–26

In the present work, we are going to report the luminescent properties of Ce3+ doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F phosphors. The emission color of the phosphors can be tuned from purplish blue to green by energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+. Furthermore, the excitation and absorption bands of the Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors broaden compared to the single-doped ones, which show potential application as phosphor for near-UV LEDs.

2. Experimental section

Ca5(BO3)3F:Ce3+/Tb3+ phosphors were prepared by a high-temperature solid-state reaction under a reductive atmosphere. In a typical synthesis procedure, raw materials CaCO3 (A.R.), CaF2 (A.R., excess 10%), H3BO3 (A.R., excess 3%), CeO2 (4N) and Na2CO3 (A.R.) were thoroughly mixed with a hypothetical composition of Ca5−2x(BO3)3F:xCe3+, xNa+ (CBOF:xCe3+, xNa+), where Na+ acted as charge compensator. After ground thoroughly, the mixed raw materials were calcined in a tube furnace at 1000 °C for 6 h under a gas flow of 5% H2 plus 95% N2. The as-synthesized phosphors were ground and subjected to phase characterization and luminescent study. Raw material Tb4O7 (4N) is used as the source of Tb3+ ion. The amount of CaCO3 is reduced for the substitution of luminescent centers. One should notice that the molar concentrations for Ce3+ and Tb3+ are 0.2x and 0.2y, respectively.

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected by a Shimadzu X-ray Diffractometer XRD-6100 with Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA with a scan speed of 8° min−1. Photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra of the phosphors were collected on a Hitachi F4500 spectrophotometer with a 150 W xenon lamp. Diffuse reflectance (DR) spectra were performed on a Hitachi U-3310 Spectrophotometer using BaSO4 as a standard reference. Decay curves were recorded on an EDINBURGH FLS920 combined Fluorescence Lifetime & Steady State Spectrometer with a 450 W xenon lamp. The morphology and elemental mapping of samples were observed with a thermal field emission environmental SEM-EDS-EBSD (Quanta 400F). Ce and Tb elements on the surface of phosphors are detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250, USA). Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) micrographs and high resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images were obtained on a Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN electron microscope (America, FEI, 200 kV). All measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Phase characterization, crystal structure and morphology

The XRD patterns of selected CBOF:xCe3+, xNa+ and CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ phosphors are shown in Fig. 1 together with standard PDF cards. When the doping contents of Ce3+ or Tb3+ are low, the samples contain mainly Ca3(BO3)3F phase (PDF#80-1702) and an impurity phase, namely, CaO (PDF#75-0264). The diffraction intensity of CaO peaks weakens gradually and finally disappears as the increase of Ce3+ or Tb3+ content (see Fig. 1d). We attempted to avoid the formation of CaO by reducing the amount of CaCO3 raw material. The diffraction peaks of CaO weaken indeed, however, additional peaks that belong to Ca3(BO3)2 appear. Fortunately, the luminescent properties of CaO:Ce3+, Na+ can be distinguished from that of CBOF:Ce3+, Na+, which will be discussed below. The crystal structure of Ca5(BO3)3F is illustrated in Fig. 1e. Ca5(BO3)3F crystallizes in a monoclinic phase. There are three Ca crystalline sites, which are denoted as Ca(1), Ca(2) and Ca(3). Ca(1) coordinates with 5 O and 1 F, Ca(2) coordinates with 6 O, and Ca(3) coordinates with 4 O and 2 F. The numbers of Ca(1), Ca(2) and Ca(3) atoms in a unit cell are 4, 4 and 2, respectively.
image file: c5ra09100d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of (a) stand PDF cards, (b) CBOF:xCe3+, xNa+ and (c) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+, (d) the magnified XRD patterns in 31–33° and 37–38° regions, (e) crystal structure of Ca5(BO3)3F.

The XRD analysis implies that Ce3+, Tb3+ and Na+ ions have entered into the lattice of the host. XPS and elemental mapping are also conducted to confirm the above assumption. Fig. 2 shows the XPS results of Ce and Tb in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.15Tb3+, 0.18Na+. The binding energies of Ce 3d5/2, Ce 3d3/2 and Tb 4d are inconsistence with the reference data,27 which indicates the existence of Ce and Tb in the final products. Elemental mapping was conducted by using SEM and EDS, in order to get the information of the distribution of these doping elements in the particles. The elemental maps of Ca, Ce, Tb and Na for corresponding particles of selected Ce3+-doped, Ce3+ and Tb3+ co-doped phosphors are shown in Fig. 3. Results indicate that the doping ions are well distributed in the particles.


image file: c5ra09100d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XPS spectra of (a) Ce 3d and (b) Tb 4d in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.15Tb3+.

image file: c5ra09100d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Elemental mapping of Ca, Ce, Tb and Na for corresponding SEM images of (a) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+, (b) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.05Tb3+, 0.08Na+ and (c) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.15Tb3+, 0.18Na+.

The SEM images of three representative phosphors are shown in Fig. 4. The morphologies of the phosphor particles are irregular with a size in micrometer region. Furthermore, the particle size increases with the amount of Na+, which implies that Na2CO3 acts as not only the supplier of charge compensator (Na+), but also fluxing agent. TEM and HRTEM images of selected Ce3+ doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors are illustrated in Fig. 5. The interplanar distances of (110) plane for these two phosphors are near the same, indicating the doping ions make little change to the crystal lattice of the host.


image file: c5ra09100d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 SEM images of selected phosphors. (a) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+, (b) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.05Tb3+, 0.08Na+ and (c) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.15Tb3+, 0.18Na+.

image file: c5ra09100d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 TEM and HRTEM images of phosphors: (a–c) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+ and (d–f) CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.15Tb3+, 0.18Na+ (FFT: Fast Fourier Transform).

3.2 Luminescence properties

The DR spectra of CBOF host, Ce3+/Tb3+ single-doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors are illustrated in Fig. 6. There is a weak absorption band around 250 nm for the host. There are two obvious absorption bands peaking at ∼340 and ∼420 nm for CBOF:Ce3+, Na+. Furthermore, a weak band around 470 nm is deduced from the asymmetric band of 420 nm. For Tb3+ doped phosphor, there are several absorption bands in 200–330 nm region. While, the absorption bands for Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors seem the combination of those for Ce3+ and Tb3+ single-doped ones. Furthermore, the absorption intensities for Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors increase with Tb3+ content.
image file: c5ra09100d-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Diffuse reflectance spectra of host, Ce3+/Tb3+ single-doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors.

The PL and PLE spectra of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+ are illustrated in Fig. 7. Firstly, the PL spectrum excited by a 360 nm light contains an asymmetric band peaking at 392 nm originating from 5d → 4f transition of Ce3+ (Fig. 7a), suggesting a purplish-blue emission. The corresponding PLE spectrum in the 200–380 nm near UV region is composed of four bands at 250, 290, 338 and 360 nm. The strongest excitation band locates at 360 nm. Secondly, the PL spectra excited by 400 and 465 nm are also collected and shown in Fig. 7b according to the DR spectra. There is no emission band when excited at 400 nm. While a broad emission band at 550 nm is observed when excited by a blue light around 460 nm, which is the same as that of CaO:Ce3+, Na+ 28,29. This PLE and PL spectra, indeed, belong to CaO:Ce3+, Na+, which will be approved below by the luminescent properties of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped samples. Fig. 7c–f show the PL spectra excited by 250, 290, 338 and 360 nm lights, which indicate that the resulted emission bands peak at a same wavelength. All the emission bands contain two Gaussian fitted bands, with energy differences of 1539–1806 cm−1, which are in consistent with the energy differences of 4f sublevels of Ce3+ due to spin–orbital coupling. Therefore, these four excitation bands, which are monitored at 392 nm, originate from the 4f → 5d transitions of Ce3+ ions on a same crystalline site. The curves of PL intensity versus Ce3+ content is illustrated in Fig. 7a, which suggests that the optimal doping content (x) of Ce3+ is 0.03, namely, Ca4.94(BO3)3F:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+. The difference between DR and PLE spectra of Ce3+ doped phosphor suggests that the absorption of a light is not necessarily accompanied by emission of a light.


image file: c5ra09100d-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) PL (λex = 360 nm) and PLE (λem = 392 nm) spectra of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+, and curve of PL intensity versus Ce3+ content; (b) PL (λex = 400, 465 nm) and PLE (λem = 550 nm) spectra of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.03Na+; (c–f) PL spectra under different UV lights and corresponding Gaussian fitted curves.

The PLE spectrum of CBOF:Tb3+, Na+ monitored at 541 nm contains five bands at 241, 261, 272, 284 and 324 nm and two weaker peaks at 379 and 485 nm (see Fig. 8a). DR spectrum of CBOF:Tb3+, Na+ also exhibits 5 absorption bands in 200–350 nm region, one of which is on the shoulder of the band at 300 nm. By comparing the DR spectra of the host and CBOF:Tb3+, Na+, and the PLE spectrum of CBOF:Tb3+, Na+, it could be deduced that the five excitation bands of CBOF:Tb3+, Na+ originate from 4f → 5d transitions of Tb3+. While the excitation peaks at 379 and 485 nm belong to 7F65D3 and 7F65D4 of Tb3+, respectively. Fig. 8b shows again the PLE and PL spectra of CBOF:Ce3+, Na+ for comparison. There is overlap between the PL spectrum of Ce3+ and the PLE spectrum of Tb3+, suggesting the existence of energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+. The PLE spectrum of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped CBOF phosphor monitored at 541 nm contains not only excitation bands from 4f → 5d and intra-4f transitions of Tb3+, but also two broad bands in about 330–450 nm region as shown in Fig. 8d, which are not the same as that monitored at 392 nm (Fig. 8b and c). The Gaussian fitting result of the 300–450 nm band for CBOF:0.03Ce3+, 0.30Tb3+, 0.33Na+ is illustrated in Fig. 8d, which contains five Gaussian peaks at 324, 341, 362, 379 and 400 nm. Therefore, the 300–385 nm PLE band of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped CBOF phosphors is the overlap of bands at 324 nm (Tb3+), 338 nm (Ce3+) and 360 nm (Ce3+). The PLE band of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors at ∼400 nm exists neither in Tb3+ single-doped nor in Ce3+ single-doped CBOF phosphors.


image file: c5ra09100d-f8.tif
Fig. 8 Comparison in PLE spectra of (a) Tb3+ single-doped CBOF phosphor (λem = 541 nm), (b) PL (λex = 360 nm) and PLE (λem = 392 nm) of Ce3+ single-doped phosphor and (c and d) PLE of Ce3+–Tb3+ co-doped CBOF phosphors.

The PL spectra of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ excited by 360 nm light contain both the purplish-blue emission band of Ce3+ and the typical narrow emission bands of Tb3+ as shown in Fig. 9a. The emission intensities of 392 nm band decrease with the increase of Tb3+ content (y), while those of Tb3+ bands increase firstly, reaching a maximum at y = 0.20, and then decrease. Fig. 9b is the PLE spectra of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped samples monitored at 541 nm. Intensities of all the PLE bands belonging to Ce3+ and Tb3+ in CBOF have similar tendencies as that of Tb3+ PL bands in co-doped samples. Fig. 9c illustrates the PL intensities of Ce3+ (392 nm) and Tb3+ (541 nm) versus Tb3+ content in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ for clarity. Fig. 9d illustrates the CIE chromaticity diagram of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ (y = 0 − 0.30) under 360 nm excitation and the photographs of corresponding phosphors under 365 nm lamp, indicating that the emission color of the phosphors can change from purplish blue to green with the increase of Tb3+ content. These results indicate that there is energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+.


image file: c5ra09100d-f9.tif
Fig. 9 (a) PL (λex = 360 nm) and (b) PLE (λem = 541 nm) spectra of CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+; (c) PL intensities of Ce3+ (392 nm) and Tb3+ (541 nm) versus Tb3+ content (y); (d) CIE chromaticity diagram for CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ (y = 0 − 0.30) under 360 nm excitation, inset: photographs of phosphors under 365 nm lamp.

Decay time curves of the Ce3+ single-doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped samples monitored at 392 nm are illustrated in Fig. 10. The decay time curve of CBOF:Ce3+, Na+ is single exponential, while it changes to non-exponential for Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped ones, and the decay time shortens with the increase of Tb3+ content. The decay curves can be well fitted by the following equations30


image file: c5ra09100d-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Decay curves of Ce3+ in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+ phosphors monitored at 392 nm and excited by a 360 nm light. Insert shows the decay times and efficiencies of energy transfer from purplish-blue Ce3+ to Tb3+.

For Ce3+ single-doped one,

 
I = A1[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−t/τ1) (1)

For Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped ones,

 
I = A1[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−t/τ1) + A2[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−t/τ2) (2)
where I is the luminescence intensity, t is the time, τ1 and τ2 are lifetimes, and A1 and A2 are constants. The average decay times (τ) can be calculated by the following formula30
 
τ = (A1τ12 + A2τ22)/(A1τ1 + A2τ2) (3)

The decay times decrease with the increase of Tb3+ as shown in Table 1 and Fig. 10. These phenomena suggest the existence of energy transfer from purplish-blue emitting Ce3+ to Tb3+. The energy transfer efficiency (ηT) from Ce3+ to Tb3+ can be calculated by the following equation31

 
image file: c5ra09100d-t1.tif(4)
where τ0 and τ are the lifetimes of Ce3+ in the absence and presence of Tb3+, respectively. The energy transfer efficiency can reach 45% when Tb3+ content (y) is 0.30 (Table 1).

Table 1 Decay times of purplish-blue Ce3+ obtained from the decay curves
Tb3+ content A1 τ1/ns A2 τ2/ns τ/ns η (%)
0 918.56 26.0     26.0  
0.05 670.27 22.2 298.15 6.0 20.5 21.2
0.10 611.17 21.0 410.14 5.9 18.6 28.5
0.15 605.29 17.1 401.84 4.2 15.3 41.2
0.20 549.65 17.6 445.70 4.6 15.3 41.2
0.25 528.34 16.6 429.66 4.8 14.4 44.6
0.30 588.88 16.2 405.43 4.4 14.3 45.0


On the basis of Dexter's energy-transfer expressions of multi-polar interactions and Reisfeld's approximation, the energy transfer behavior from Ce3+ to Tb3+ can be deduced by the following formula32,33

 
ηS0/ηSCα/3 (5)
where ηS0 and ηS are the luminescence quantum efficiencies of Ce3+ in the absence and presence of Tb3+, respectively; C is the total concentration of Ce3+ and Tb3+; and the α values 3, 6, 8 and 10 correspond to exchange interaction, electric dipole–dipole (d–d), dipole–quadrupole (d–q) and quadruople–quadrupole (q–q) interactions, respectively. ηS0/ηS can be estimated approximately by the ratio of relative emission intensities (IS0/IS), where IS0 and IS are the emission intensity of Ce3+ in the absence and presence of Tb3+, respectively. Fig. 11 shows the dependence of IS0/IS of purplish-blue Ce3+ on Cα/3 in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+. The linear relationship for IS0/ISC8/3 and IS0/ISC10/3 is better than the other two. However, q–q interaction is generally not expected to play an important role in solids in view of the very short interaction range.34 Therefore, d–q interaction is responsible for the energy transfer from purplish-blue Ce3+ to Tb3+.


image file: c5ra09100d-f11.tif
Fig. 11 Dependence of IS0/IS of purplish-blue Ce3+ on Cα/3 in CBOF:0.03Ce3+, yTb3+, (0.03 + y)Na+.

The critical distance (Rc) of energy transfer from purplish-blue Ce3+ to Tb3+ can be calculated by using the equation given by Blasse35

 
Rc = 2[3V/(4πXcN)]1/3 (6)
where V is the volume of the unit cell, N is the number of host cations in the unit cell. Xc is the total concentration of Ce3+ and Tb3+, where the emission of Tb3+ in the co-doped phosphor reaches the maximum. By introducing the values of V (453.08 Å3), N (10) and Xc (0.046, 0.03 × 0.2 + 0.20 × 0.2), the critical distance is calculated to be 12.3 Å, which is an effective distance for d–q interaction.

The PLE spectra in Fig. 9 may suggest that the introduction of Tb3+ ion forces Ce3+ to occupy another Ca site and results in additional PLE and PL spectra. The PL spectra of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped phosphors excited at 400 nm are illustrated in Fig. 12a, which contain not only the emission peaks of Tb3+, but also a broad band in 450–700 nm region peaking at ∼530 nm. The emission intensities of both the broad band and Tb3+ peaks increase with Tb3+ content from 0.05 to 0.20, and then decrease. However, the PL intensities are much weaker than those based on purplish-blue emitting Ce3+. The PL spectra of Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped samples excited by a 465 nm light are shown in Fig. 12b, which also contain a broad band at ∼540 nm. The broad band weakens and disappears with the increase of Tb3+ content. When monitored by 520 nm as containing little emission intensity from Tb3+, the PLE spectra exhibit a strong band peaking at ∼400 nm, a band at ∼465 nm and several other weaker bands in the region of 200–370 nm (Fig. 12c). The profile of the weaker bands is similar as that monitored at 541 nm (Fig. 9b), which belongs to 4f → 5d transition of Tb3+ and purplish-blue Ce3+. Sharp peaks on the 465 nm band are due to the interference of Xe lamp. The PLE bands at 400 and 465 nm have similar tendencies as those of the corresponding PL spectra. Fig. 12d shows the PLE intensities versus Tb3+ content. All the luminescent properties shown before indicate that the co-doping of Tb3+ ions forces Ce3+ ions to occupy another Ca site, which results in a broad emission band at ∼530 nm excited by a light around 400 nm. The PLE band at 465 nm and corresponding PL band at ∼540 nm belong to CaO:Ce3+, as these bands decrease with the increase of Tb3+, which are in accordance with the XRD results. Co-doping of Tb3+ ions facilitates the disappearance of CaO phase.


image file: c5ra09100d-f12.tif
Fig. 12 PL spectra of CBOF:Ce3+, Tb3+, Na+ excited by (a) 400 nm and (b) 465 nm light, (c) PLE spectra monitored at 520 nm, (d) PLE intensity at 400 and 465 nm versus Tb3+ content.

The above discussion indicates that Ce3+ ions can occupy two Ca sites of CBOF and exhibit two different luminescent properties. It is well known that the excitation and emission spectra of Ce3+ doped phosphors are related to nephelauxetic effect, crystal field splitting effect and Stokes shift.36–38 The nephelauxetic effect will result in a shift of the energy barycenter (centroid shift, εc) of 5d levels relative to the free ion value. The crystal field splitting (εcfs) is the energy difference between the highest and lowest 5d levels of Ce3+ in a certain crystalline site. While Stokes shift is the energy difference between the peaks values of the lowest excitation band and the highest emission band.

The 5d centroid shift of Ce3+ (in eV, relative to the free ion value of 6.2 eV) can be expressed by the following equation39,40

 
image file: c5ra09100d-t2.tif(7)
where Ri is the distance (pm) between Ce3+ and anion i in the undistorted lattice. The summation is over all N anions that coordinate Ce3+. 0.6ΔR is a correction for lattice relaxation around Ce3+, and ΔR is the difference between the radii of Ce3+ and cation sites that Ce3+ ions occupy. αspi (in units of 10−30 m−3) is the spectroscopic polarizability of anion i. For O, αOsp = 0.33 + 4.8/χav2. For F, αFsp = 0.15 + 0.96/χav2. χav is the electronegativity of the cations. χav = (10χCa + 9χB)/19 = 1.47 in Ca5(BO3)3F, and one obtains αOsp = 2.55 × 10−30 m−3 and αFsp = 0.59 × 10−30 m−3. If Ce3+ can occupy all the three Ca sites, the εc values for Ce3+(1), Ce3+(2) and Ce3+(3) are calculated to be 1.52, 1.44 and 1.27 eV, respectively.

The energy of the lowest 5d excited level of Ce3+ is influenced by crystal field splitting and centroid shift. The crystal field splitting of the 5d levels can be expressed as41

 
εcfs = βpolyQRav−2 (8)
where βpolyQ is a constant that depends on the type of the coordination polyhedron, Q is 3 + for Ce3+, and Rav is close to the average distance between anions and cation that is replaced by Ce3+. Three Ca sites are all coordinated by six anions. To simplify the comparison, the βpolyQ values are assumed to be the same, viz. βoctaQ = 1.35 × 109 pm2 cm−1.42 Rav values for Ca(1), Ca(2) and Ca(3) in Ca5(BO3)3F are 233.9, 241.5 and 235.6 pm, respectively. Therefore, the εcfs values for Ce3+(1), Ce3+(2) and Ce3+(3) are 3.06, 2.87 and 3.02 eV, respectively. The εc and εcfs values for Ce3+(1), Ce3+(2) and Ce3+(3) are in the following order:
εc: Ce3+(1) > Ce3+(2) > Ce3+(3)

εcfs: Ce3+(1) > Ce3+(3) > Ce3+(2)

Ca(2) is coordinated by six O atoms, forming an octahedron which is the most distorted one among the three Ca polyhedra. Ce3+ on an octahedron with a more distorted form may have more 5d sublevels. Therefore, it could be deduced that the PLE (360 nm)–PL (392 nm) spectra belong to Ce3+(2). While PLE (400 nm)–PL (∼530 nm) spectra may originate from Ce3+(1) based on the comparison of εc and εcfs. Different Stokes shift values are related to the difference in size and morphology of the Ca sites occupied by Ce3+. The 4f and 5d energy levels of Ce3+ on the two Ca sites and energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+ are illustrated roughly in Fig. 13.


image file: c5ra09100d-f13.tif
Fig. 13 Schematic diagram of 4f and 5d energy levels for Ce3+ and Tb3+, and Ce3+ → Tb3+ energy transfer in CBOF host.

4. Conclusion

In summary, Ce3+ doped and Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F phosphors have been synthesized successfully by a high-temperature solid-state reaction. Ca5(BO3)3F:Ce3+, Na+ phosphor exhibits a purplish-blue emission peaking at 392 nm with a strongest excitation band at 360 nm, which originates from Ce3+ on Ca(2) site. The excitation energy of Ce3+ can transfer to Tb3+ efficiently, showing a broader excitation band in 300–400 nm region for Tb3+. Furthermore, the co-doping of Tb3+ ion results in the appearance of green emitting Ce3+ on Ca(1) site. Ce3+, Tb3+ co-doped Ca5(BO3)3F shows potential application as green emitting phosphor for near-UV LEDs.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51402105 and 21471055), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (grant no. 20134306120009 and 20124306120005), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 12JJ2029) and Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province.

References

  1. L. Chen, C.-C. Lin, C.-W. Yeh and R.-S. Liu, Materials, 2010, 3, 2172–2195 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. C. C. Lin and R.-S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 1268–1277 CrossRef CAS.
  3. P. F. Smet, A. B. Parmentier and D. Poelman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2011, 158, R37–R54 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. V. Bachmann, C. Ronda and A. Meijerink, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 2077–2084 CrossRef CAS.
  5. S. Ye, F. Xiao, Y. X. Pan, Y. Y. Ma and Q. Y. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 2010, 71, 1–34 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. M. Shang, C. Li and J. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 1372–1386 RSC.
  7. Z. Xia, Y. Zhang, M. S. Molokeev, V. V. Atuchin and Y. Luo, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 3310 Search PubMed.
  8. Y. He, J. Zhang, W. Zhou, J. Han, Z. Qiu, L. Yu, C. Rong and S. Lian, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2014, 97, 1517–1522 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. S.-P. Lee, C.-H. Huang, T.-S. Chan and T.-M. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 7260–7267 CAS.
  10. A. Kalaji, M. Mikami and A. K. Cheetham, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 3966–3975 CrossRef CAS.
  11. W.-Y. Huang, F. Yoshimura, K. Ueda, Y. Shimomura, H.-S. Sheu, T.-S. Chan, C.-Y. Chiang, W. Zhou and R.-S. Liu, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 2075–2085 CrossRef CAS.
  12. X. Gong, J. Huang, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Z. Luo and Y. Huang, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 6607–6614 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. Jiao, Y. Jia, W. Lu, W. Lv, Q. Zhao, B. Shao and H. You, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 3202–3209 RSC.
  14. Y. Li, Y. Shi, G. Zhu, Q. Wu, H. Li, X. Wang, Q. Wang and Y. Wang, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 7668–7675 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. X. Zhang, L. Zhou, Q. Pang, J. Shi and M. Gong, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 7591–7598 CAS.
  16. X. Zheng, H. Luo, J. Liu, P. Liu and X. Yu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 7598–7607 RSC.
  17. Y. Zhang, G. Li, D. Geng, M. Shang, C. Peng and J. Lin, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51, 11655–11664 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. Z. Xia and R.-S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 15604–15609 CAS.
  19. G. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Geng, M. Shang, C. Peng, Z. Cheng and J. Lin, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 296–305 CAS.
  20. H. Liu, Y. Luo, Z. Mao, L. Liao and Z. Xia, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 1619–1627 RSC.
  21. D. Geng, M. Shang, Y. Zhang, H. Lian, Z. Cheng and J. Lin, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 2345–2353 RSC.
  22. J. Chen, Z. Xia and Q. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 4197–4204 RSC.
  23. Z. Xia, J. Zhuang, A. Meijerink and X. Jing, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 6327–6336 RSC.
  24. G. Zhu, S. Xin, Y. Wen, Q. Wang, M. Que and Y. Wang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 9311–9318 RSC.
  25. Y. Wang, M. G. Brik, P. Dorenbos, Y. Huang, Y. Tao and H. Liang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 7002–7009 CAS.
  26. M. Jiao, N. Guo, W. Lü, Y. Jia, W. Lv, Q. Zhao, B. Shao and H. You, Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52, 10340–10346 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Moulder and G. E. Muilenberg, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation and Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, 1979 Search PubMed.
  28. Z. Hao, X. Zhang, Y. Luo, L. Zhang, H. Zhao and J. Zhang, J. Lumin., 2013, 140, 78–81 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. Z. Hao, X. Zhang, X. Wang and J. Zhang, Mater. Lett., 2012, 68, 443–445 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. C.-H. Huang and T.-M. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 2349–2355 CAS.
  31. P. I. Paulose, G. Jose, V. Thomas, N. V. Unnikrishnan and M. K. R. Warrier, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2003, 64, 841–846 CrossRef CAS.
  32. D. L. Dexter, J. Chem. Phys., 1954, 22, 1063–1070 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. R. Reisfeld, E. Greenberg, R. Velapoldi and B. Barnett, J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 56, 1698–1705 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. C. Ronda, Luminescence: From Theory to Applications, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2008 Search PubMed.
  35. G. Blasse, Philips Res. Rep., 1969, 24, 131–144 CAS.
  36. V. Bachmann, C. Ronda, O. Oeckler, W. Schnick and A. Meijerink, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 316–325 CrossRef CAS.
  37. G. Blasse and B. C. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994 Search PubMed.
  38. R.-J. Xie, Y. Q. Li, N. Hirosaki and H. Yamamoto, Nitride Phosphors and Solid-State Lighting, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2011 Search PubMed.
  39. P. Dorenbos, Phys. Rev. B, 2000, 62, 15640–15649 CrossRef CAS.
  40. P. Dorenbos, J. Lumin., 2003, 105, 117–119 CrossRef CAS.
  41. P. Dorenbos, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2003, 15, 4797–4807 CrossRef CAS.
  42. P. Dorenbos, Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 64, 125117 CrossRef.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.