DOI:
10.1039/C5RA07762A
(Paper)
RSC Adv., 2015,
5, 65175-65183
Synthesis of heteroarenes dyads from heteroarenes and heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides via Pd-catalyzed desulfitative C–H bond heteroarylations
Received
28th April 2015
, Accepted 24th July 2015
First published on 24th July 2015
Abstract
We report herein on the palladium-catalyzed direct heteroarylation of heteroarenes (e.g., pyrroles, furans, and thiophenes) in which heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides are used as coupling partners through a desulfitative cross-coupling. These C–H bond functionalizations occurred at the α-position in the case of pyrrole and furan derivatives, while in the case of thiophenes the C–H bonds at the β-position have been heteroarylated. This methodology represents a very simple route to heteroaryl dyads. Moreover, some examples of heteroaryl triads have been synthesized via iterative C–H bond arylations.
Introduction
Polyheteroaromatic compounds are well represented in organic chemistry. This motif is present in many pharmaceuticals. For examples, RITA an heteroaryl triad containing a furan 2,5-substituted by thiophenes, is a potent multi-target drug against cancer (Fig. 1).1 ER-38930, which possesses a pyrazole core, was also shown to markedly activate transactivation of the RARR receptor.2 Benzofuranyl-pyrrole derivative I act as potent retinoic acid receptor α agonist (Fig. 1).3 Prodigiosine is a bright red tripyrrole pigment isolated from Serratia marcescens, which displays several biological activities such as antibacterial, anticoccidial, antimalarial, and antifungal activities, and is often used as a biochemical tool (Fig. 1). Polyheteroaromatics can also be found in organometallic chemistry as ligands (e.g., bipyridines, polythiophenes, …) and for the preparation of electronic devices.
The abundance of polyheteroaromatic structures in organic compounds led to intense efforts to develop new methods for their synthesis over the last few decades.4 Palladium catalysis is a very useful tool for the C–C bond formation.5 The synthesis of heteroaryl dyads has been widely reported using palladium catalysis from organometallic reagents with heteroaryl halides (Fig. 2A). Major contributions focused on the synthesis of C2–C2′ heteroaryl dyads – which found some applications as electronic devices6 – but a few examples of the synthesis C3–C2′ or C3–C3′ heteroaryl dyads have been also reported using trialkyl(heteroaryl)stannane derivatives and 2-haloheteroaryls,7 or 3-haloheteroaryls.7b,8 On the other hand, palladium-catalyzed direct C–H bond arylation has emerged as one of the most suitable and eco-friendly alternative for the formation of C–C bonds, because of a simpler access to reactants with generation of lower amount of waste.9 Palladium-catalyzed direct arylation of heteroarenes with heteroaryl halides for the formation of C2–C2′ or C2–C3′ heteroaryl dyads has been reported,10 which includes intramolecular reactions,11 moreover some applications in the synthesis of electronic devices were also described (Fig. 2B).12
 |
| Fig. 1 Relevant bioactive polyheteroaryl compounds. | |
 |
| Fig. 2 Palladium-catalyzed heteroarylation reactions. | |
More recently, we reported the use of benzenesulfonyl chlorides as an original alternative to aryl halides for the direct arylation of heteroarenes through palladium-catalyzed desulfitative C–H bond functionalizations.13 Benzenesulfonyl chlorides exhibits several advantages such as commercial availability for many of them at an affordable cost including heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides. They can also be easily prepared from sulfonic acids or sulfur substrates by chlorination.14 In addition, palladium-catalyzed direct arylation of thiophenes with benzenesulfonyl chlorides offered different regioisomers than the reaction performed with aryl bromides.13a In the course of our previous study on Pd-catalyzed desulfitative cross-coupling reactions, we demonstrated on one example that methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate might be used as coupling partner to afford a 3-3′ dithiophene derivative in good yield (Fig. 2C). To the best of our knowledge, this is the only example of such desulfitative direct heteroarylation reported in the literature. As a wide scope of heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides are commercially available and due to the lack of information concerning their reactivities in palladium-catalyzed desulfitative cross-coupling, their potentials in the synthesis of heteroaryl dyads and triads needed to be studied (Fig. 2D).
Result and discussion
Firstly, we decided to investigate the reactivity of thiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride in palladium catalyzed desulfitative arylation reaction of 5-membered rings containing one heteroelement. We selected a fully substituted thiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride to prevent homocoupling side reactions (Scheme 1). We attempted the heteroarylation of 1-methylpyrrole with 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride as heteroarylating agent using our previous best reaction conditions for such desulfitative C–H bond arylations,13c namely 5 mol% PdCl2(CH3CN)2 in the presence of 3 equiv. of lithium carbonate in dioxane at 140 °C. We found that the reaction proceeded smoothly to afford the 2-heteroarylation product 1 in 81% yield. It is important to note that all C–halogen bonds including the C–Br one were untouched during the reaction, which allows further transformations. Then, we attempted the reaction using furan derivatives as the coupling partners. Both 2-n-butylfuran and menthofuran were regioselectively heteroarylated at C5-position to give 2 and 3 in 64% and 70% yields, respectively. Interestingly, the reaction conditions tolerates enolizable ketone substituent as 1-(furan-2-yl)propan-2-one reacted with 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride to provide the desired arylated product 4 in 65% yield. The reaction performed with benzofuran as the starting material led to the unexpected debrominated coupling product 5 in 42% yield. Benzothiophene was arylated at C3-position to give the desired thiophene dyad 6 in moderate yield. Nevertheless, this result could be an opening wedge in original and efficient synthesis of 3,3′-bithiophene derivatives. We investigated next the reactivity of other thiophene-3-sulfonyl chlorides. Thiophene bearing only chloro or methyl substituents at the positions 2 and 5 afforded the coupling products with 1-methylpyrrole 7 and 9 in lower yields of 51% and 36%, respectively. Moreover, no reaction occurred between 2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride and 2-n-butylfuran. Finally, we found that the reaction proceeded in high yield with a thiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride bearing an electron-withdrawing group at C2. Indeed, the desulfitative heteroarylation in which methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate was used as coupling partner allowed the formation of the desired products 10–14 in good yields whatever the heteroarene.
 |
| Scheme 1 Palladium-catalyzed direct desulfitative heteroarylations using thiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride derivatives. | |
We next turned our attention to the reactivity of thiophene-2-sulfonyl chlorides as the heteroarylating agents in such coupling reactions (Scheme 2). Overall, these derivatives displayed a lower reactivity than their 3-substituted homologues. Unsubstituted thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride was coupled with 1-methylpyrrole to furnish 1-methyl-2-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrole (15) in 42% yield. Then, we studied the influence of substituents at the C5 position on thiophene-2-sulfonyl chlorides. With thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride substituted by a C5 methyl substituent, a slightly better yield of 46% in favor of the desired coupling product 16 was obtained. Chloro or bromo substituents at the C5 position of thiophene-2-sulfonyl chlorides were also tolerated by the reaction conditions to afford the thiophenylpyrrole derivatives 17 and 18 in 55% and 48% yields, respectively. Again, these reaction conditions were completely chemoselective, as C–X bond was not involved in the direct arylation process, allowing further transformations through iterative processes. 1-Benzylpyrrole has been heteroarylated affording 19 in 62% yield using the most reactive 5-chlorothiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride; whereas, 2-n-butylfuran was found to be unreactive. 3-Heteroarylated 1,2-dimethylindole 21 was synthesized in moderate yield using 2-thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride.
 |
| Scheme 2 Palladium-catalyzed direct desulfitative heteroarylations using thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride derivatives. | |
Next, we examinated the reactivity of nitrogen containing heteroarylsulfonyl chloride derivatives as the heteroarylating agents (Scheme 3). Pyridine-3-sulfonyl chloride displayed a very low reactivity. For example, the coupling products with 1-methylpyrrole or 2-n-butylfuran gave 22 and 23 in only 31% and 12% yields, respectively. This heteroarylpyridine synthesis pathway is not attractive compared to the reaction performed using 3-bromopyridine as the arylation agent through also a C–H bond activation.15 On the other hand, the preparation of 2-bromo-1-methylpyrrole is challenging due to over-bromination or decomposition,16 whereas 1-methylpyrrole-2-sulfonyl chlorides can be easily prepared from 1-methylpyrroles by chlorosulfonylation using chlorosulfuric acid. Moreover, some pyrrole-2-sulfonyl chlorides are commercially available. The reaction between 1-methylpyrrole and methyl 5-(chlorosulfonyl)-1-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate allowed the formation of pyrrole dyad 24 in 69% yield.
 |
| Scheme 3 Palladium-catalyzed direct desulfitative heteroarylations using nitrogen-containing sulfonyl chloride derivatives. | |
In order to get a wider substrate scope, the synthesis of a pyrazole unit bearing a chlorosulfonyl function was attempted. Starting from 3-methyl-1-phenylpyrazole, we expected that the use of chlorosulfonic acid would provide the pyrazole 25, in which the chlorosulfonyl function would be introduced at the C5-position. However, we only observed the formation of the regioisomer 26, which is formed by the activation of the para C–H bond of the phenyl ring (Scheme 4, top). This regioselectivity is different to the bromination of pyrazole with NBS, which proceeds at the pyrazole C4-position. With substrate 26 in hands, we investigated its reactivity in palladium-catalyzed desulfitative arylations for the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads (Scheme 4, bottom). The arylation of 1-methylpyrrole took place at the expected C2 position allowing the formation of the triaryl 27 in 72% yield, while 2-methylthiophene was arylated at the C4-position to give the desired product 28 in 63% yield. It is important to note that such triaryls exhibit a similar structure to N6022, which is a potent S-nitrosoglutathione reductase inhibitor in clinical development17 – and this elegant synthetic pathway might provide an easier access to new analogues.
 |
| Scheme 4 Synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads from 4-(3-methylpyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonyl chloride via Pd-catalyzed direct desulfitative arylation. | |
Finally, thanks to the high chemoselectivity of these palladium-catalyzed desulfitative heteroarylations, in which the C–Br bonds remained untouched, we conducted a second direct arylation for the synthesis of heteroaryl triad compounds (Scheme 5). As examples, the derivative 18, which bears a C–Br bond at C2-position on the thiophene ring, was heteroarylated – using our previous reaction conditions10i – affording the triad 29 and 30 in 78% and 82% yields, respectively, through a C–H bond activation of thiazoles.
 |
| Scheme 5 Application to the synthesis of heteroaryl triads. | |
As heteroaryl dyads are important building blocks in the preparation of pharmaceuticals or electronic devices, we demonstrated the scalability of Pd-catalyzed desulfitative heteroarylation. The reaction was conducted on 10 mmol scale and afforded 2.5 g of the compound 3 after purification (Scheme 6).
 |
| Scheme 6 Application to gram-scale synthesis. | |
Although the exact mechanism is not completely elucidated, we can propose a reasonable pathway for palladium-catalyzed direct heteroarylation of heteroarenes (Fig. 3). Based on Dong and co-workers report,18 the first step might be an oxidative addition of the heteroarylsulfonyl chloride to Pd(II) to afford the Pd(IV) intermediate A. Then, a SO2 extrusion occurred to afford electrophilic aryl-palladium(II) specie B. An electrophilic palladation of thiophene at β-position affords the intermediate C; whereas with pyrroles and furans, the electrophilic palladation occurred at α-position affording E intermediate. Then, the base assisted the rearomatization process gives the intermediates D and F, which undergo reductive elimination to afford the desired arylated products and regenerates the Pd(II) catalysts. However, a Pd(0)/P(II) catalytic cycle cannot be excluded.
 |
| Fig. 3 Proposed mechanism for palladium-catalyzed desulfitative heteroarylation reactions. | |
Conclusions
In summary, we have developed a new methodology for the one-step synthesis of heteroaryl dyads based on palladium-catalyzed desulfitative heteroarylation through a C–H bond activation of heteroarenes. We established that 5 mol% PdCl2(CH3CN)2 catalyst in the presence of Li2CO3 as base in dioxane promotes the desulfitative heteroarylation of a variety of heteroarenes such as thiophenes, furans, and pyrroles – which is the most reactive substrates – with diverse heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides as coupling partners. Thiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride derivatives generally displayed a high reactivity, while thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride derivatives have been smoothly reacted only with 1-methylpyrrole. Other heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides containing nitrogen atom have also been successfully used. It is important to note that with heteroarylsulfonyl chlorides, uncommon functionalization at the C3-position occurred with thiophenes. Moreover, other regioisomers could be obtained using chlorosulfonylation instead of bromination, as demonstrated with a 1-phenylpyrazole. In addition, such cross-coupling reactions are very chemoselective as C–Br bonds were untouched allowing iterative direct arylations for the synthesis of heteroaryl triads in only two steps.
Experimental section
General
All reactions were carried out under argon atmosphere with standard Schlenk-tube techniques. HPLC grade 1,4-dioxane was used and stored under argon without further purification. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker GPX (400 MHz or 300 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts (d) were reported in parts per million relative to residual chloroform (7.26 ppm for 1H; 77.0 ppm for 13C), constants were reported in Hertz. 1H NMR assignment abbreviations were the following: singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), doublet of doublets (dd), doublet of triplets (dt), and multiplet (m). 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz on the same spectrometer and reported in ppm. All reagents were weighed and handled in air.
Preparation of the PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst19
An oven-dried 40 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stirring bar under argon atmosphere, was charged with [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2 (182 mg, 0.5 mmol) and dppb (426 mg, 1 mmol). 10 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane were added, then, the solution was stirred at room temperature for twenty minutes. The solvent was removed in vacuum. The powder was used without purification (31P 381 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 19.3 (s).
General procedure for synthesis of heteroarylated heteroarenes
To a 25 mL oven dried Schlenk tube, heteroarylsulfonyl chloride (1–1.2 mmol), heteroarenes (1–4 mmol), Li2CO3 (0.222 g, 3 mmol), 1,4-dioxane (2 mL) and PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (12.9 mg, 0.05 mmol) were successively added. The reaction mixture was evacuated by vacuum–argon cycles (5 times) and stirred at 140 °C (oil bath temperature) for 24 h (see tables and schemes). After cooling the reaction at room temperature and concentration, the crude mixture was purified by silica column chromatography to afford the heteroarylated heteroarens.
2-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophen-3-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (1). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.330 g, 1 mmol) affords 1 in 81% (0.252 g) yield.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.78 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (t, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (dd, J = 1.9 and 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 132.0, 126.6, 123.8, 123.5, 123.0, 114.0, 111.5, 107.9, 34.4.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C9H6BrCl2NS (311.02): C 34.76, H 1.94; found: C 34.85, H 2.07.
2-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophen-3-yl)-5-butylfuran (2). 2-n-Butylfuran (0.124 g, 1 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.396 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 2 in 64% (0.227 g) yield.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.70 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.69 (quint., J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (sext., J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 0.95 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 150.4, 136.5, 122.1, 116.9, 116.3, 105.3, 103.5, 99.3, 23.1, 20.8, 15.3, 6.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C12H11BrCl2OS (354.08): C 40.71, H 3.13; found: C 40.82, H 3.36.
2-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophen-3-yl)-3,6-dimethyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran (3). Menthofuran (0.150 g, 1 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.396 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 3 in 70% (0.266 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 2.71 (dd, J = 5.1 and 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.47–2.33 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.18 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.90 (s, 3H), 1.88–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.35 (m, 1H), 1.1 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 151.7, 138.4, 130.6, 125.9, 123.2, 121.0, 118.5, 112.8, 31.5, 31.2, 29.6, 21.6, 20.2, 9.3.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C14H13BrCl2OS (380.12): C 44.24, H 3.45; found: C 44.37, H 3.56.
1-(5-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophen-3-yl)furan-2-yl)propan-2-one (4). 1-(Furan-2-yl)propan-2-one (0.124 g, 1 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.396 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 4 in 70% (0.248 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.75 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 2.22 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 203.6, 148.9, 144.8, 128.6, 124.2, 124.1, 112.7, 110.4, 109.7, 43.4, 29.4.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C11H7BrCl2O2S (354.04): C 37.32, H 1.99; found: C 37.59, H 1.81.
2-(2,5-Dichlorothiophen-3-yl)benzofuran (5). Benzofuran (0.118 g, 1 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.396 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 5 in 42% (0.113 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.61 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.5 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 153.8, 148.9, 128.7, 128.3, 127.1, 125.1, 125.0, 123.2, 122.5, 121.3, 111.2, 104.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C12H6Cl2OS (269.14): C 53.55, H 2.25; found: C 53.81, H 2.37.
3-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophen-3-yl)benzo[b]thiophene (6). Benzothiophene (0.134 g, 1 mmol) and 4-bromo-2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.396 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 6 in 47% (0.171 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.94–7.91 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.41 (q, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 139.6, 137.4, 133.5, 128.1, 128.1, 128.0, 124.7, 124.4, 123.6, 123.2, 122.8, 112.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C12H5BrCl2S2 (364.10): C 39.59, H 1.38; found: C 39.79, H 1.12.
2-(2,5-Dichlorothiophen-3-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (7). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 2,5-dichlorothiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.251 g, 1 mmol) affords 7 in 51% (0.118 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.73 (dd, J = 1.8 and 3.1 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (dd, J = 1.8 and 3.1 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (t, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 130.8, 127.9, 126.1, 125.1, 124.1, 123.5, 110.6, 107.9, 34.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C9H7Cl2NS (232.12): C 46.57, H 3.04; found: C 46.71, H 3.32.
2-(2,5-Dimethylthiophen-3-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (9). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 2,5-dimethylthiophene-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.211 g, 1 mmol) affords 9 in 36% (0.069 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.68 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 6.19 (t, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (dd, J = 1.7 and 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.33 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 135.2, 134.8, 129.8, 128.8, 127.4, 122.0, 109.0, 107.3, 34.5, 15.3, 14.0.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C11H13NS (191.29): C 69.07, H 6.85; found: C 69.33, H 7.05.
Methyl 3-(1-methylpyrrol-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (10). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (0.241 g, 1 mmol) affords 9 in 79% (0.175 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.51 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.23–6.21 (m, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.49 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 162.0, 139.5, 132.2, 131.9, 130.0, 128.4, 127.3, 123.2, 109.6, 107.5, 52.0, 34.4.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C11H11NO2S (221.27): C 59.71, H 5.01; found: C 59.87, H 5.28.
Methyl 3-(5-butylfuran-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (11). 2-n-Butylfuran (0.124 g, 1 mmol) and methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (0.289 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 11 in 66% (0.174 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.53 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 2.68 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.67 (quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (sext., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 0.95 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 162.4, 156.8, 147.3, 137.2, 130.1, 128.5, 122.8, 113.9, 107.5, 52.0, 30.2, 27.9, 22.3, 13.9.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C14H16O3S (264.34): C 63.61, H 6.10; found: C 63.85, H 6.27.
Methyl 3-(5-(2-oxopropyl)furan-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (12). 1-(Furan-2-yl)propan-2-one (0.124 g, 1 mmol) and methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (0.289 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 12 in 53% (0.140 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.53–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 2.19 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 203.5, 162.2, 148.7, 148.1, 136.4, 130.2, 128.5, 123.9, 113.9, 110.8, 52.0, 43.4, 29.1.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C13H12O4S (264.30): C 59.08, H 4.58; found: C 59.26, H 4.81.
Methyl 3-(3,6-dimethyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (13). Menthofuran (0.150 g, 1 mmol) and methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (0.289 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 13 in 65% (0.189 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.46 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.71 (dd, J = 5.4 and 16.5 Hz, 1H), 2.49–2.33 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.19 (m, 1H), 2.00–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.91 (s, 3H), 1.90–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.1 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 162.1, 150.6, 142.0, 137.2, 130.2, 129.9, 126.5, 119.9, 119.2, 52.0, 31.4, 31.3, 29.6, 21.6, 20.2, 9.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C16H18O3S (290.38): C 66.18, H 6.25; found: C 66.42, H 6.39.
Methyl 3-(benzofuran-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (14). Benzofuran (0.118 g, 1 mmol) and methyl 3-(chlorosulfonyl)thiophene-2-carboxylate (0.289 g, 1.2 mmol) affords 14 in 62% (0.160 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.97 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J = 1.4 and 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 1.5, 7.1 and 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 162.1, 154.3, 150.2, 136.4, 130.3, 129.4, 129.2, 126.5, 125.2, 122.9, 121.8, 111.0, 108.8, 52.2.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C14H10O3S (258.29): C 65.10, H 3.90; found: C 65.31, H 4.17.
1-Methyl-2-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrole (15). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.182 g, 1 mmol) affords 15 in 42% (0.069 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.25 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (dd, J = 3.8 and 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 6.72–6.68 (m, 1H), 6.35–6.30 (m, 1H), 6.16 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.20
1-Methyl-2-(5-methylthiophen-2-yl)pyrrole (16). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 5-methylthiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.182 g, 1 mmol) affords 16 in 46% (0.082 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 6.90 (s, 1H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 6.81 (s, 1H), 6.14 (s, 1H), 6.01 (s, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.43 (s, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.21
2-(5-Chlorothiophen-2-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (17). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 5-chlorothiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.217 g, 1 mmol) affords 17 in 55% (0.109 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.45 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 1.6 and 3.8 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (dd, J = 2.6 and 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 142.1, 138.6, 131.6, 130.2, 128.1, 127.0, 119.0, 108.7, 35.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C9H8ClNS (197.68): C 54.68, H 4.08; found: C 54.89, H 3.83.
2-(5-Bromothiophen-2-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (18). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 5-bromothiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.217 g, 1 mmol) affords 18 in 48% (0.116 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.39 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 1.9 and 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (dd, J = 2.6 and 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 145.2, 132.3, 130.6, 130.2, 128.1, 121.2, 119.0, 108.7, 35.8.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C9H8BrNS (242.13): C 44.64, H 3.33; found: C 44.97, H 3.12.
1-Benzyl-2-(5-chlorothiophen-2-yl)pyrrole (19). 1-Benzylpyrrole (0.314 g, 2 mmol) and 5-bromothiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.217 g, 1 mmol) affords 19 in 62% (0.169 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.41–7.26 (m, 5H), 7.1 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.63 (t, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.14 (t, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 6.10–6.08 (m, 1H), 5.09 (s, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 137.4, 136.6, 134.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 126.8, 126.6, 120.7, 108.3, 106.9, 106.7, 50.3.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C15H12ClNS (273.78): C 65.81, H 4.42; found: C 66.07, H 4.61.
1,2-Dimethyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)-indole (21). 1,2-Dimethylindole (0.290 g, 2 mmol) and thiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride (0.182 g, 1 mmol) affords 21 in 37% (0.084 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.80 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.27–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.22 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.11–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd, J = 0.9 and 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.56 (s, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.22
3-(1-Methylpyrrol-2-yl)pyridine (22). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and pyridine-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.178 g, 1 mmol) affords 22 in 31% (0.049 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.66–8.65 (m, 1H), 8.48–8.47 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.85 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.42 (m, 1H), 6.91–6.90 (m, 1H), 6.28–6.26 (m, 1H), 6.11–6.08 (m, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.21
3-(5-Butylfuran-2-yl)pyridine (23). 2-n-Butylfuran (0.186 g, 1.5 mmol) and pyridine-3-sulfonyl chloride (0.178 g, 1 mmol) affords 23 in 12% (0.024 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.88 (m, 1H), 8.49 (m, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (m, 1H), 6.62 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.67 (quint., J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.23
Methyl 1,1′-dimethyl-1H,1′H-[2,2′-bipyrrole]-5-carboxylate (24). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and methyl 5-(chlorosulfonyl)-1-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate (0.238 g, 1 mmol) affords 24 in 69% (0.151 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 6.99 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 130.1, 128.1, 127.6, 122.5, 120.3, 116.8, 115.9, 107.4, 107.2, 51.1, 36.8, 35.0.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C12H14N2O2 (218.26): C 66.04, H 6.47; found: C 66.14, H 6.63.
4-(3-Methylpyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonyl chloride (26). To a solution of chlorosulfuric acid (5 mL) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) a solution of 3-methyl-1-phenylpyrazole (1.58 g, 10 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was slowly added at 0 °C, then the resulting mixture was warm-up to room temperate and stirred during 16 h. Then, the crude mixture was poured in ice and the solid was collected by filtration of affords 26 in 89% (2.28 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.01 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 6.32 (s, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H).
3-Methyl-1-(4-(1-methylpyrrol-2-yl)phenyl)pyrazole (27). 1-Methylpyrrole (0.162 g, 2 mmol) and 4-(3-methylpyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonyl chloride (0.257 g, 1 mmol) affords 27 in 72% (0.171 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.83 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.28–6.26 (m, 2H), 6.23 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 150.5, 138.7, 133.6, 131.0, 129.4, 127.2, 123.8, 118.7, 108.7, 107.8, 107.6, 35.0, 13.7.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C15H15N3 (237.31): C 75.92, H 6.37; found: C 76.14, H 6.59.
3-Methyl-1-(4-(5-methylthiophen-3-yl)phenyl)pyrazole (28). 2-Methylthiophene (0.196 g, 2 mmol) and 4-(3-methylpyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonyl chloride (0.257 g, 1 mmol) affords 28 in 63% (0.160 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.82 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (s, 1H), 6.26 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 150.6, 141.1, 140.8, 138.8, 134.0, 127.4, 127.1, 124.5, 119.1, 118.0, 107.6, 15.5, 13.7.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C15H14N2S (254.09): C 70.83, H 5.55; found: C 71.12, H 5.41.
2-Ethyl-4-methyl-5-(5-(1-methylpyrrol-2-yl)thiophen-2-yl)thiazole (29). 2-(5-Bromothiophen-2-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (0.242 g, 1 mmol), 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole (0.191 g, 1.5 mmol), KOAc (0.194 g, 2 mmol) and PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (12.1 mg, 0.02 mmol), were dissolved in DMA (3 mL) under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at 150 °C for 16 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the product was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford 29 in 78% (0.225 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.02 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 6.73–6.70 (m, 1H), 6.36 (dd, J = 1.4 and 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.98 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H).
This is a known compound and the spectral data are identical to those reported in literature.10i
2-Isobutyl-5-(5-(1-methylpyrrol-2-yl)thiophen-2-yl)thiazole (30). 2-(5-Bromothiophen-2-yl)-1-methylpyrrole (0.242 g, 1 mmol), 2-isobutylthiazole (0.212 g, 1.5 mmol), KOAc (0.194 g, 2 mmol) and PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (12.1 mg, 0.02 mmol), were dissolved in DMA (3 mL) under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at 150 °C for 16 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the product was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford 30 in 81% (0.248 g) yield.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 1.9 and 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (dd, J = 1.9 and 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (dd, J = 2.7 and 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.87 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.18–2.08 (m, 1H), 1.02 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 169.1, 137.5, 135.0, 132.1, 131.7, 126.6, 125.6, 125.1, 124.6, 110.4, 108.2, 42.4, 35.4, 29.8, 22.3.
Elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C16H18N2S2 (302.45): C 63.54, H 6.00; found: C 63.82, H 5.79.
Notes and references
- L. M. Espinoza-Fonseca, Theor. Biol. Med. Modell., 2005, 2, 38 CrossRef PubMed.
- K. Kikuchi, S. Hibi, H. Yoshimura, K. Tai, T. Hida, N. Tokuhara, T. Yamauchi and M. Nagai, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2000, 10, 619–622 CrossRef CAS.
- H. Yoshimura, K. Kikuchi, S. Hibi, K. Tagami, T. Satoh, T. Yamauchi, A. Ishibahi, K. Tai, T. Hida, N. Tokuhara and M. Nagai, J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 2929–2937 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) D. Zhao, J. You and C. Hu, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 5466–5492 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, J. M. Alonso and I. Fernández, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 6688–6701 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros and C. Lazaro-Milla, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 6992–6995 RSC.
-
(a) J. J. Li and G. W. Gribble, Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry, Pergamon, Amsterdam, 2000 Search PubMed;
(b) L. Ackermann, Modern arylation methods, Wiley, 2009 Search PubMed;
(c) C. C. C. Johansson Seechurn, M. O. Kitching, T. J. Colacot and V. Snieckus, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5062–5085 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) Y. Yang, A. B. Hoernfeldt and S. Gronowitz, Synthesis, 1989, 130–131 CrossRef CAS;
(b) K. Yui, Y. Aso, T. Otsubo and F. Ogura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1989, 62, 1539–1546 CrossRef CAS;
(c) R. Rossi, A. Carpita, M. Ciofalo and V. Lippolis, Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 8443–8460 CrossRef CAS;
(d) G. Palmisano and M. Santagnostino, Synlett, 1993, 771–773 CrossRef CAS;
(e) R. L. Hudkins, J. L. Diebold and F. D. Marsh, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 6218–6220 CrossRef CAS;
(f) T. Bach and L. Krueger, Synlett, 1998, 1185–1186 CrossRef CAS;
(g) P. R. L. Malenfant, L. Groenendaal and J. M. J. Frechet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10990–10991 CrossRef CAS;
(h) F. Odobel, S. Suresh, E. Blart, Y. Nicolas, J.-P. Quintard, P. Janvier, J.-Y. Le Questel, B. Illien, D. Rondeau, P. Richomme, T. Haupl, S. Wallin and L. Hammarstrom, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3027–3046 CrossRef CAS;
(i) H. V. Huynh, X. He and T. Baumgartner, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4899–4901 RSC;
(j) J.-F. Jheng, Y.-Y. Lai, J.-S. Wu, Y.-H. Chao, C.-L. Wang and C.-S. Hsu, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 2445–2451 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(k) Q. Wu, S. Ren, M. Wang, X. Qiao, H. Li, X. Gao, X. Yang and D. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23, 2277–2284 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(l) J. Zhou, S. Xie, E. F. Amond and M. L. Becker, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 3391–3394 CrossRef CAS;
(m) X. Liu, Y. Sun, B. B. Y. Hsu, A. Lorbach, L. Qi, A. J. Heeger and G. C. Bazan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 5697–5708 CAS;
(n) R. L. Uy, L. Yan, W. Li and W. You, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 2289–2295 CrossRef CAS;
(o) R. Yeh-Yung Lin, F.-L. Wu, C.-H. Chang, H.-H. Chou, T.-M. Chuang, T.-C. Chu, C.-Y. Hsu, P.-W. Chen, K.-C. Ho, Y.-H. Lo and J. T. Lin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 3092–3101 RSC;
(p) M. Nakano, I. Osaka and K. Takimiya, Macromolecules, 2015, 48, 576–584 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) J. M. Clough, I. S. Mann and D. A. Widdowson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 2645–2648 CrossRef CAS;
(b) D. Prim, J. Giner Planas, A. Auffrant, F. Rose-Munch, E. Rose and J. Vaissermann, J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 688, 273–279 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) D. H. Boschelli, B. Wu, A. C. B. Sosa, H. Durutlic, J. J. Chen, Y. Wang, J. M. Golas, J. Lucas and F. Boschelli, J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 3891–3902 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) L. Ilies, H. Tsuji, Y. Sato and E. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4240–4241 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(e) P. van Rijn, T. J. Savenije, M. C. A. Stuart and J. H. van Esch, Chem. Commun., 2009, 2163–2165 RSC.
-
(a) T. Otsubo, Y. Kono, N. Hozo, H. Miyamoto, Y. Aso, F. Ogura, T. Tanaka and M. Sawada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1993, 66, 2033–2041 CrossRef CAS;
(b) P. G. Ciattini, E. Morera and G. Ortar, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 2405–2408 CrossRef CAS;
(c) K. Tanaka, H. Suzuki and H. Osuga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 457–460 CrossRef CAS;
(d) M. Alvarez, D. Fernandez and J. A. Joule, Synthesis, 1999, 615–620 CrossRef CAS;
(e) L. San Miguel, W. W. Porter III and A. J. Matzger, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1005–1008 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(f) L.-Y. Yang, C.-F. Chang, Y.-C. Huang, Y.-J. Lee, C.-C. Hu and T.-H. Tseng, Synthesis, 2009, 1175–1179 CAS.
-
(a) E. M. Beccalli, G. Broggini, M. Martinelli and S. Sottocornola, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5318–5365 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) S. Pascual, P. de Mendoza and A. M. Echavarren, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 2727–2734 RSC;
(c) F. Bellina, S. Cauteruccio and R. Rossi, Curr. Org. Chem., 2008, 12, 774–790 CrossRef CAS;
(d) F. Kakiuchi and T. Kochi, Synthesis, 2008, 3013–3039 CrossRef CAS;
(e) B.-J. Li, S.-D. Yang and Z.-J. Shi, Synlett, 2008, 949–957 CAS;
(f) L. Ackermann, R. Vicente and A. R. Kapdi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9792–9826 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(g) X. Chen, K. M. Engle, D.-H. Wang and J.-Q. Yu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 5094–5115 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(h) T. W. Lyons and M. S. Sanford, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1147–1169 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(i) T. Satoh and M. Miura, Synthesis, 2010, 3395–3409 CrossRef CAS;
(j) S. H. Cho, J. Y. Kim, J. Kwak and S. Chang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5068–5083 RSC;
(k) N. Kuhl, M. N. Hopkinson, J. Wencel-Delord and F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10236–10254 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(l) B.-J. Li and Z.-J. Shi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 5588–5598 RSC;
(m) D.-G. Yu, B.-J. Li and Z.-J. Shi, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 5130–5136 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(n) M. He, J.-F. Soulé and H. Doucet, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 1824–1859 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(o) R. Rossi, F. Bellina, M. Lessi and C. Manzini, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 17–117 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(p) K. Yuan, J.-F. Soulé and H. Doucet, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 978–991 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) S. Pivsa-Art, T. Satoh, Y. Kawamura, M. Miura and M. Nomura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1998, 71, 467–473 CrossRef CAS;
(b) N. Masuda, S. Tanba, A. Sugie, D. Monguchi, N. Koumura, K. Hara and A. Mori, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 2297–2300 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) S. Tanba, A. Sugie, N. Masuda, D. Monguchi, N. Koumura, K. Hara and A. Mori, Heterocycles, 2010, 82, 505–529 CrossRef CAS;
(d) D. Takeda, M. Yamashita, K. Hirano, T. Satoh and M. Miura, Chem. Lett., 2011, 40, 1015–1017 CrossRef CAS;
(e) H. Y. Fu, L. Zhao, C. Bruneau and H. Doucet, Synlett, 2012, 23, 2077–2082 CrossRef CAS;
(f) J. Zhang, D.-Y. Kang, S. Barlow and S. R. Marder, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 21392–21394 RSC;
(g) J. Laroche, K. Beydoun, V. Guerchais and H. Doucet, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 2072–2080 RSC;
(h) S. Preciado, L. Mendive-Tapia, F. Albericio and R. Lavilla, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 8129–8135 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(i) F. Belkessam, A. Mohand, J.-F. Soulé, A. Elias and H. Doucet, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2014, 10, 2912–2919 CrossRef PubMed;
(j) A. D. Hendsbee, C. M. Macaulay and G. C. Welch, Dyes Pigm., 2014, 102, 204–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(k) Y. Li, J. Wang, M. Huang, Z. Wang, Y. Wu and Y. Wu, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 2890–2897 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(l) B. Koszarna, R. Matczak, M. Krzeszewski, O. Vakuliuk, J. Klajn, M. Tasior, J. T. Nowicki and D. T. Gryko, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 225–231 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) A. K. Yadav, H. Ila and H. Junjappa, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 338–344 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) E. Coya, N. Sotomayor and E. Lete, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 1853–1865 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) T. T. H. Luong, J.-D. Brion, M. Alami and S. Messaoudi, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 751–761 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) Y. L. Choi, H. Lee, B. T. Kim, K. Choi and J.-N. Heo, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 2041–2049 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) N. I. Abdo, A. A. El-Shehawy, A. A. El-Barbary and J.-S. Lee, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 2012, 5540–5551 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) B. Liu, Z. Wang, N. Wu, M. Li, J. You and J. Lan, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 1599–1603 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) M. J. Robb, D. Montarnal, N. D. Eisenmenger, S.-Y. Ku, M. L. Chabinyc and C. J. Hawker, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 6431–6438 CrossRef CAS;
(d) C. Moussalem, O. Segut, F. Gohier, M. Allain and P. Frere, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2014, 2, 1043–1048 CrossRef CAS;
(e) M. Wakioka, N. Ichihara, Y. Kitano and F. Ozawa, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 626–631 CrossRef CAS;
(f) P.-O. Morin, T. Bura, B. Sun, S. I. Gorelsky, Y. Li and M. Leclerc, ACS Macro Lett., 2015, 4, 21–24 CrossRef CAS;
(g) J. G. Weis and T. M. Swager, ACS Macro Lett., 2015, 4, 138–142 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) K. Yuan and H. Doucet, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 392–396 RSC;
(b) A. Beladhria, K. Yuan, H. Ben Ammar, J.-F. Soulé, R. Ben Salem and H. Doucet, Synthesis, 2014, 46, 2515–2523 CrossRef CAS;
(c) R. Jin, K. Yuan, E. Chatelain, J.-F. Soulé and H. Doucet, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 3831–3841 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) N. S. Johary and L. N. Owen, J. Chem. Soc., 1955, 1307–1311 RSC;
(b) A. Barco, S. Benetti, G. P. Pollini and R. Taddia, Synthesis, 1974, 877–878 CrossRef CAS;
(c) S. Fujita, Synthesis, 1982, 423–424 CrossRef CAS;
(d) T. Kataoka, T. Iwama, T. Setta and A. Takagi, Synthesis, 1998, 423–426 CrossRef CAS;
(e) G. Blotny, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 1499–1501 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) M. Romero, Y. Harrak, J. Basset, L. Ginet, P. Constans and M. D. Pujol, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 9010–9016 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) S. Bensaid and H. Doucet, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 7655–7662 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- H. M. Gilow and D. E. Burton, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 2221–2225 CrossRef CAS.
-
(a) X. Sun, J. Qiu, S. A. Strong, L. S. Green, J. W. F. Wasley, J. P. Blonder, D. B. Colagiovanni, S. C. Mutka, A. M. Stout, J. P. Richards and G. J. Rosenthal, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2011, 21, 5849–5853 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) X. Sun, J. W. F. Wasley, J. Qiu, J. P. Blonder, A. M. Stout, L. S. Green, S. A. Strong, D. B. Colagiovanni, J. P. Richards, S. C. Mutka, L. Chun and G. J. Rosenthal, ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 402–406 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. Zhao and V. M. Dong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 932–934 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Cantat, E. Génin, C. Giroud, G. Meyer and A. Jutand, J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 687, 365–376 CrossRef CAS.
- S. Lotz, C. Crause, A. J. Olivier, D. C. Liles, H. Gorls, M. Landman and D. I. Bezuidenhout, Dalton Trans., 2009, 697–710 RSC.
- F. Bilodeau, M.-C. Brochu, N. Guimond, K. H. Thesen and P. Forgione, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 1550–1560 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Tsuchimoto, M. Iwabuchi, Y. Nagase, K. Oki and H. Takahashi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 1375–1379 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. J. Dong, J. Roger, F. Pozgan and H. Doucet, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 1832–1846 RSC.
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.