Zhimin Ren,
Siqi Yu,
Xinxin Fu,
Lin Shi,
Chunxiao Sun,
Chenyao Fan,
Qi Liu,
Guodong Qian and
Zhiyu Wang*
State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. E-mail: wangzhiyu@zju.edu.cn; Fax: +86-571-87952539; Tel: +86-571-87952539
First published on 13th April 2015
In this study, we have demonstrated coordination-driven self-assembly between Fe3O4 and graphene sheets under a hydrothermal condition for the simple in situ synthesis of a 3D Fe3O4–graphene hybrid architecture (Fe3O4/G). Fine hierarchical Fe3O4 spheres were homogeneously dispersed and embedded in an interconnected mesoporous framework of graphene sheets. It can be noted that the critical concentration of GO assembly decreased dramatically during the self-assembly of Fe3O4, indicating the coordination-driven self-assembly between Fe3O4 and GO. When evaluated as an anode material for LIBs, the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework demonstrates a high reversible capacity of 1164 mA h g−1 over 500 cycles at a current density of 500 mA g−1 and a remarkable rate capability. The superior electrochemical performance is attributed to a strong adhesion force and synergistic effect between Fe3O4 and graphene sheets as well as formation of a 3D interconnected hybrid framework, which offers enhanced kinetics towards electrochemical reactions with lithium ions and provides space for alleviating the huge volume expansion that occurs during charge–discharge cycles.
Downsizing particles to the nanoscale with special morphologies is an effective way to improve the electrochemical properties because of the high surface areas, large pore volumes and short diffusion lengths for both Li ions and electrons. In particular, the hierarchical micro-structure constructed by nanoparticles has aroused tremendous interest due to the combined advantages of nano- and micro-materials.19–21 Another feasible approach is to form hybrid materials by introducing conducting carbon matrices to absorb the volume changes and improve the electronic conductivity of the electrode.22–24 Graphene, a two-dimensional single layer sheet of hexagonal carbon, has emerged as one of the most appealing carbon matrices for metal oxide particles because of its excellent electrical conductivity, high surface area, and good chemical and thermal stability. Graphene oxide (GO), which has abundant functional groups and exhibits strong adhesion to metal ions, is often used in situ for the preparation of nanoparticles/graphene composites.25,26 Recent works have revealed that 2D graphene oxide assembles into 3D architectures under hydrothermal conditions if the concentration of GO is at least 1 mg mL−1.27 Using a similar method, a Fe3O4–graphene hybrid framework can also be prepared by introducing Fe3O4 nanocrystals or Fe3+ into a GO suspension (GO concentration is up to 1.5 mg mL−1). With this in mind, numerous GO-based Fe3O4 host materials have been successfully synthesized and show enhanced properties.28–32 However, most of the studies focused on the assembly of graphene oxide. There are still very few reports on the simultaneous co-assembly process of Fe3O4 nanocrystals and graphene oxide.
In this study, we prepared a three-dimensional graphene framework with a uniform distribution of hierarchical Fe3O4 spheres via a one-pot solvothermal method. Accompanied with the formation and assembly of Fe3O4 crystals, GO is also reduced and assembled into a 3D network at the same time. The two assembly processes reinforced and interacted with each other through coordination-driven self-assembly to form the integral Fe3O4–graphene hybrid framework (Fe3O4/G). The critical feature of this method is the usage of an ethylene glycol–water system and sodium oleate. The as-formed 3D hybrid framework has the advantage of the two building blocks and exhibits an outstanding reversible capacity and excellent rate performance.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the synergistic effect of self-assembly and the formation of Fe3O4/G hybrid 3D framework. |
The crystallographic structure and phase purity of the F3O4/G, Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 were determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), as shown in Fig. 2. It was found that all the diffraction peaks can be well indexed to the magnetic cubic structure of Fe3O4 (JCPDS 79-0419). The mean crystallite size of the Fe3O4/G and Fe3O4/G mixed are 18.6 and 23.6 nm, respectively, as calculated using the Scherrer equation according to the (311) peaks. In addition, a diffraction peak at ∼26° corresponding to graphene was observed in the pattern of Fe3O4/G mixed, which can be ascribed to the reduction and stacking of GO. Remarkably, no apparent peak can be identified at 20–30° in the Fe3O4/G sample, indicating that the Fe3O4 spheres are efficiently deposited on the surface of graphene, suppressing the stacking of graphene layers, which reflects the fact that the F3O4/G is composed of few-layer stack graphene sheets.
The morphologies and microstructure of the samples were characterized by SEM and TEM. As shown in Fig. 3a and b, without the presence of GO, the bare Fe3O4 spheres are constructed by primary nanoparticles and have a wide size distribution of 100–500 nm. Fig. 3c is a typical SEM image of the Fe3O4/G framework. From the image it is clear that the Fe3O4 spheres are uniformly wrapped by graphene sheets and each of them has a diameter of about 210 nm (Fig. S2†). The TEM image also reveals that these Fe3O4 particles are firmly attached to the graphene sheet, even after extended sonication was used to disperse the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework for TEM characterization. We believe that this perfect combination prevents the agglomeration of nanoparticles and also enables fast electron transport through the underlying graphene layers to Fe3O4, guaranteeing the efficient electrochemical performance. The high-resolution TEM images in Fig. 3e and f show the interfacial structure between the graphene and Fe3O4 spheres. The well-resolved lattice fringes with an interplane distance of 0.253 nm are caused by the (311) plane of Fe3O4. It should be emphasized that the volume of GO solution is a critical factor in our one-pot synthesis approach. We found that when the volume of the GO solution was 6 mL, the Fe3O4 spheres would be anchored by graphene sheets to form hybrid hydrogels and do not present an obstacle to the self-assembly of Fe3O4 (Fig. 2c and d and S3b†). A small amount of GO solution would result in ineffective wrapping around the Fe3O4 spheres (Fig. S3a†), while a large amount of GO solution would damage the assembled structure of the Fe3O4 spheres (Fig. S3c and 3d†). Therefore, we chose the Fe3O4/G (6 mL GO solution) sample for the following structure and properties characterization.
Fig. 4a presents N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for Fe3O4/G at 77 K. The isotherm can be identified as a type-IV isotherm with an H3 hysteresis loop that is attributed to a mesoporous structure, which indicates that the Fe3O4 spheres have hierarchical structure. The pore size distribution for Fe3O4/G is shown in the inset of Fig. 4a and it demonstrates the formation of randomly distributed pores with sizes from 4 to 16 nm with dominant 4 and 8 nm pores. The isotherms of Fe3O4/G mixed and pure Fe3O4 have similar results, as shown in Fig. S4a–d.† Although the BET specific area of Fe3O4/G is almost the same for both Fe3O4/G mixed and pure Fe3O4, the total pore volume of Fe3O4/G is about two times larger than that of the two others as shown in Fig. 4b. Combined with the TEM and SEM images, we conclude the pore structures may benefit electrolyte ion diffusion to active sites with less resistance and tolerate the volume changes of Fe3O4/G during the charge–discharge cycles.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was employed to further characterize the product. The wide scan XPS spectrum of the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework demonstrates the presence of Fe, O, and C elements (Fig. S5a†). Fig. 5a–b exhibits the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Fe3O4/G. In Fig. 5a, the Fe 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 peaks located at around 711 and 724.9 eV are observed, which indicates that the presence of both the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in Fe3O4. For carbon, the C 1s XPS profiles in Fig. 2c not only shows the presence of the carbon element but also reveals the efficient reduction of GO. After solvothermal reaction, the sp2 CC bonds at 284.5 eV increased, while the epoxy C–O bonds at 286.1 eV and C
O bonds at 288.3 eV decreased, indicating an efficient reduction.35 The structural and electronic properties of graphene in the Fe3O4/G hybrid have been investigated using laser Raman spectroscopy. For comparison, we also measured the Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 and the results are shown in Fig. 5c. Both the Fe3O4/G hybrid and Fe3O4/G mixed show two prominent peaks, one is the G band at about 1600 cm−1, which corresponds to ordered sp2 bond carbon, and the other is the D band at around 1350 cm−1, which results from edges, other defects and disordered carbon in the symmetrical hexagonal graphitic lattice.36 Compared to the Fe3O4/G mixed sample, the shift of the peaks can be found for both D and G bands in Fe3O4/G hybrid, indicating a significant charge transfer between the graphene nanosheets and Fe3O4 spheres.15 The appearance of weak D and G peaks of the bare Fe3O4 can be ascribed to the carbonization of ligands during calcining. The content of Fe3O4 in the composite was evaluated by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, with the results shown in Fig. 5d. The weight loss of ∼0.4% up to 150 °C is attributed to the release of water adsorbed on the samples. The weight loss that occurs during the heat treatment from room temperature to 800 °C is attributed to the oxidation of graphene/carbon, and a weight gain afterwards is believed to correspond to the oxidation of Fe3O4 in air. As for bare Fe3O4, no obvious weight loss is found, indicating that the weight gain (oxidation of Fe3O4) is equal to the weight loss (oxidation of amorphous). Therefore, the amorphous carbon in bare Fe3O4 can be derived to be about 4 wt%. For the Fe3O4/G and Fe3O4/G mixed samples, based on the total weight loss of carbon materials (9.6% and 8.4%), the original weight fraction of Fe3O4 is calculated as 86.4% and 87.6%, respectively, and the content of graphene in Fe3O4/G and Fe3O4/G mixed are calculated to be 5.6% and 4.4%, which is approximately consistent with the theoretical calculations. TG results show that the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework has a relatively high mass loading of active materials compared with other Fe3O4–graphene composites (Table 1).
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 XPS spectra of core-level Fe 2p (a) and C 1s (b) for Fe3O4/G hybrid framework; Raman spectra (c) and TGA curves (d) of Fe3O4/G, Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 samples. |
Materials | Ratio | Cycles (density) | Capacity | Retention | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a (1 C = 1 A g−1). Ratio: the weight percentage of active material in composites. Retention: the capacity retention from the second to the end of cycles. | |||||
Fe3O4–graphene | 87.6% | 500 (0.5 C) | 1164 | 99.4% | This work |
50 (1 C) | 831 | — | |||
Fe3O4–graphene | 67% | 300 (5.2 C) | 577 | ∼96.1% | 34 |
Fe3O4–graphene | 70% | 50 (1 C) | 612 | ∼47.1% | 32 |
Fe3O4–graphene | 40% | 50 (0.05 C) | 675 | ∼73.4% | 31 |
Fe3O4–graphene | 87.2% | 300 (0.1 C) | 1107 | ∼83.5% | 28 |
Fe3O4–C–graphene | 50.2% | 100 (0.1 C) | 660 | ∼72.1% | 54 |
Fe3O4–graphene | 87.7% | 100 (0.7 C) | ∼560 | ∼91.0% | 30 |
Fe3O4–graphene | ∼70% | 30 (0.2 C) | 1100 | ∼91.6% | 12 |
Fe3O4–C | 45.4% | 100 (0.05 C) | 610 | ∼55.5% | 38 |
Fe3O4–C | 83% | 100 (1 C) | 831 | ∼83.1% | 41 |
Fe3O4–C | 89.8% | 120 (0.2 C) | 1232 | 107% | 40 |
In order to characterize the electrochemical properties of the samples, half-cells with the lithium plate as the counter electrode were fabricated. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the Fe3O4/G and bare Fe3O4 were measured between 0.005 and 3 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. As seen in Fig. 6a and Fig. S6a,† it is obvious that both the samples demonstrate similar well defined redox peaks signifying the lithiation and delithiation of Fe3O4. In the first scan, the cathodic peak appearing at 0.52 V is attributed to the reduction of Fe3+ and Fe2+ to Fe0 (Fe3O4 + 8Li → 3Fe + 4Li2O) and the formation of SEI layer. In the first anodic process, two peaks were observed at 1.65 and 1.85 V in Fe3O4/G, attributed to the oxidation of Fe0 to Fe2+ and Fe3+, respectively.37,38 It is clear that the subsequent cycles are quite different from the first one. Both the anodic and cathodic peaks are positively shifted, which is attributed to structural modification after the first cycle due to lithium insertion and extraction.39 It can be noted that the cathodic peaks at 0.75 V and the anodic peaks located at about 1.70 and 1.96 V for the second or fifth cycle of the Fe3O4/G electrode almost overlap, indicating the high reversibility of electrode.40,41 The charge–discharge curves of the Fe3O4/G hybrid and bare Fe3O4 electrodes for the 1st, 2nd, 100th, 200th, and 500th cycles are illustrated in Fig. 6b and Fig. S6b.† As shown in Fig. 6b, the first discharge and charge capacities of Fe3O4/G are measured to be 1573 and 1113 mA h g−1, respectively, resulting in an initial Coulombic efficiency of 72.4%. The bare Fe3O4 exhibits a similar electrochemical performance at the first cycle, with the first discharge and charge capacities of 1216 and 924 mA h g−1, producing a Coulombic efficiency of 75.9% (Fig. S6b†). We note that the first discharge capacity is much higher than that of the theoretical value for Fe3O4 and graphene; moreover, the reasons for exceeding theoretical capacities can be ascribed to the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase resulting from electrolyte degradation at low voltage and additional interfacial/active site Li storage mechanism due to nano-scale and mesoporous structures, as well as the synergistic effect between the graphene and the Fe3O4 particles.42,43 The initial Coulombic efficiency of bare Fe3O4 is slightly higher than that of Fe3O4/G, which may be ascribed to the lower surface area of bare Fe3O4 (Fig. 4b). The irreversible capacity loss can be attributed to the inevitable formation of a surface SEI layer accompanying the electrolyte decomposition during discharge. The long plateau at 0.7 V in the initial discharge curve corresponds to the reversible reduction from Fe3+ (or Fe2+) to Fe0 [LixFe3O4 + (8 − x)Li+ + (8 − x)e− → 4Li2O + 3Fe] and the irreversible formation of a solid electrolyte interphase film. From the second cycle, this plateau increases to a slightly higher voltage and becomes much shorter, indicating that different lithiation reactions take place between the first and the following cycles and the existence of irreversible reactions. With cycling, no obvious changes to either charge or discharge profiles are observed, indicating a highly reversible electrode reaction process and a stable electrode structure characteristic. In the case of the bare Fe3O4, although the first discharge curve is very similar to that of the Fe3O4/G, the specific capacity of the bare Fe3O4 electrode decreases rapidly due to volume expansion in the subsequent charge–discharge cycles, as shown in Fig. S6b.†
Fig. 6c shows the long-term cycling performance and the corresponding Coulombic efficiency of the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework and bare Fe3O4 electrodes in a potential window of 0.02–3 V vs. Li+/Li at a current density of 500 mA g−1. In order to clearly demonstrate the superior electrochemical performance and synergistic effect in Fe3O4/G, we prepared the Fe3O4/G mixed sample by physically mixing graphene with Fe3O4 spheres to offer comparisons with the Fe3O4/G electrode. In our study, the capacity is calculated based on the total mass of the composite, including Fe3O4 and graphene sheets. As can be seen, the Fe3O4/G electrode exhibits higher capacity and good cyclic retention compared to Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4. The initial discharge capacities are 1537, 1247 and 1216 mA h g−1 for Fe3O4/G, Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4, respectively. After 500 cycles, the Fe3O4/G still delivers a discharge of 1164 mA h g−1, while the capacities of Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 decrease dramatically to 702 and 297 mA h g−1, respectively. Moreover, Fe3O4/G still possesses better lithium storage properties even compared with Fe3O4/G mixed (the same graphene content), indicating that there exists a strong interaction force between Fe3O4 and graphene, which is consistent with the TEM and Raman results. In addition, the Coulombic efficiency of Fe3O4/G increased rapidly after several cycles and steadily reached up to 99%. Moreover, it can be noted that the specific capacity undergoes a gradual rising process after the slow fading process in the first 80 cycles. Such a phenomenon of increasing capacity upon cycling has been found in Fe3O4 and other metal oxide anode materials.29,44–48 To clarify the mechanism, the cycle curve of Fe3O4/G hybrid was divided into two different steps based on the variation of the specific capacity, as illustrated in Fig. 6c–e. Stage (A): an obvious drop in specific capacity was recorded, which may be ascribed to the cracking of some of un-anchored Fe3O4 particles. Stage (B): the specific capacity stabilizes in the range of 80–150 cycles and increases after 170 cycles. This may be caused by three factors as follows. First, several discharge–charge cycles are needed to form a stable SEI film, allowing the greigite crystals to percolate throughout and establish intimate contacts with the current collector.49,50 Second, the slight increase of capacity is due to the reversible growth of a polymeric gel-like film caused by the decomposition of electrolytes at a low potential, which enables mechanical cohesion and delivers excess capacity through a so-called “pseudo-capacity-type” mechanism. Last but not least, an anomalous monotonic increase in the discharge capacity was observed from 884 (102th) and 1015 (201th) to 1118 mA h g−1 (260th) and is followed by a nearly constant capacity at 1160 mA h g−1 till the 500th cycle. The voltage profiles are shown in Fig. 6e. The discharge curves overlap basically at ∼0.8 V, which indicates the sustained excellent reversibility of the traditional conversion mechanism in Fe3O4/G anode. However, the curve's decay below 0.8 V slows down and the voltage hysteresis becomes narrower as confirmed by the closer discharge–charge voltage profiles with cycling, which results from faster kinetics and an improved energy efficiency.51,52 The electrochemical properties of the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework prepared in the present study and those of the iron oxide materials reported in the literature are summarized in Table 1. It can be seen that the Fe3O4/G hybrid electrode is of high capacity and excellent cycling stability, as well as a high ratio of active materials in composites. The reasons for high specific capacity and good cycling stability of the Fe3O4/G hybrid can be ascribed to the following factors: (1) the hierarchical structure and uniform size distribution of Fe3O4 spheres can alleviate stress due to volume expansion in the discharge–charge process, (2) the incorporation of graphene not only enhances the conductivity of electrode, but also partially accommodates the volume change during cycling, (3) the strong adhesive force of Fe3O4 to graphene empowers fast electron transport through graphene to enhance the electrochemical performance. (4) The 3D hybrid framework constructed by hierarchical Fe3O4 spheres and flexible graphene sheets possesses a large number of pores and large electrolyte/electrode interface area, which suggests that it has more channels for Li-ion diffusion and reversible lithium storage site and (5) the Fe3O4 crystals are uniformly anchored among the network of graphene, which inhibits pulverization and maintains the integrity of electrode.
Benefiting from the unique structure of Fe3O4/G hybrid framework, the Fe3O4/G electrode exhibits exceptional rate performance. As shown in Fig. 7a, the electrode delivers capacities of 1280, 1240, 1145, 956, 831 and 510 mA h g−1 when cycled at high rate of 100, 200, 400, 800, 1000 and 2000 mA g−1, respectively, which present a superior rate performance in comparison with presently reported results. When the charge–discharge system is back to the 200 mA g−1, the discharge capacities can recover. To demonstrate the synergistic effect between Fe3O4 and graphene, the rate capability of Fe3O4/G mixed is also investigated under the same condition. Compared to the Fe3O4/G electrode, Fe3O4/G mixed electrode delivers much lower specific capacities 200–1000 mA h g−1 at current rates of 100–2000 mA g−1 as a result of inefficient electron and lithium-ion transportation between Fe3O4 and graphene. As for the bare Fe3O4 electrode, the reversible capacity continuously decayed with cycling, and exhibited a capacitance less than 50 mA h g−1 at a current of 2000 mA g−1. In addition, the Fe3O4/G hybrid exhibits excellent rate cyclic performance, because there is no significant capacity loss at each rate test.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 (a) Rate performance of Fe3O4/G, Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 cycled between 0.02 and 3 V. (b) Nyquist plots at the OCP (5 mV perturbation) for the electrodes. |
As an important index for insight into the electrochemical behaviour, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was conducted to identify the relationship between the electrochemical performance and electrode kinetics. All the coin cells are cycled by rate testing before EIS testing. The Nyquist plots for the samples are shown in Fig. 7b with a frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz, which share the common feature of a depressed semicircle at high frequency and an inclined line at low frequency. The diameter of the semicircle for the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework electrode in the high-medium frequency region is much smaller than that of Fe3O4/G mixed or bare Fe3O4, indicating that the former electrodes possess the minimum charge transfer resistance (Rct) among the three samples. This means that the rapid electron transfer during the electrochemical reaction of the composite can be ascribed to the increased contact area and strong binding force between Fe3O4 and graphene as well as the enhanced electrical conductivity of the overall electrode.53,54 In the low frequency region, a more vertical straight line of Fe3O4/G compared to Fe3O4/G mixed and bare Fe3O4 is further evidence for the faster Li+ ion diffusion behavior of the Fe3O4/G hybrid framework electrodes. The Fe3O4/G hybrid framework presents satisfying electrochemical kinetics properties, leading to a remarkable improvement in cyclic stability and rate properties.
As shown by the results presented above, the Fe3O4/G hybrid electrode displays excellent electrochemical performance and structural stability. These outstanding properties can be attributed to several potential factors. Firstly, the 3D Fe3O4/G hybrid frameworks provide a large surface area and efficiently reduce the diffusion length of both electrons and lithium ions. Secondly, graphene sheets provide a highly conductive matrix for electron transfer during the lithiation and delithiation processes. Moreover, the intimate interaction between Fe3O4 and graphene sheets prevents the aggregation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the restacking of graphene nanosheets.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra04837k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |