Novel textile material based disposable sensors for biomedical analysis

Raluca-Ioana Stefan-van Staden*ab, Livia Alexandra Gugoaşăab, Marius Badulescuc and Carmen Cristina Surdu-Bobc
aLaboratory of Electrochemistry and PATLAB, National Institute of Research for Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, 202 Splaiul Independentei Str., 060021, Bucharest-6, Romania. E-mail: ralucavanstaden@gmail.com; Fax: +40 21 3163113; Tel: +40 75 1507779
bFaculty of Applied Chemistry and Material Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
cLow Temperature Plasma Laboratory, National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics (NILPRP), Str. Atomistilor 409, Magurele, Romania

Received 18th March 2015 , Accepted 14th May 2015

First published on 14th May 2015


Abstract

A novel textile material was used for the design of new disposable stochastic sensors for biomedical analysis. The textile material used had a veil texture, and was plasma coated with a layer of silver; the sensing part was covered using a plasma technique with a second layer of carbon like diamond. The silver side was used as an electrical contact. The diamond side was modified with three types of maltodextrines having different dextrose equivalence (DE) (MD-1 (DE 4.0–7.0), MD-2 (DE 13.0–17.0), MD-3 (DE 16.5–19.5)). Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a key role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, was used as a model analyte. These stochastic microsensors can be used reliably for both qualitative and quantitative analysis for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples with limits of determination as low as 1 fg mL−1.


Introduction

In biomedical fields, the detection of biomarkers is the most researched aspect, in the last few years. Biomarkers are used as indicators of biological and pathological processes in the body and their concentration levels may provide information about a specific disease. It is essential to have a high sensitive method of analysis in order to diagnose diseases at a very early stage (asymptomatic patients). This kind of method requires simple and small devices for sensitive and reliable measurement of biomarkers, to reduce costs and to facilitate diagnosis by eliminating the need for trained personnel to perform the analysis.1

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a polypeptide chain of 185 rests of amino acids, which form a bunch of 4 α-helixes,2 a major inflammatory mediator that presents both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects and it is a regulator of immune responses.3 IL-6 it is also a cytokine type of biomarker for cardiovascular diseases,4 and a potential indicator of leukemia5 and of visceral and abdominal obesity.6 It is known that in circulating blood, 15–35% of total IL-6 concentration originates from adipose tissue,7 which is why adiposity contributes to the pro-inflammatory state.8 Serum IL-6 levels are high in humans with excess adiposity.9 Moreover, IL-6 was fully connected by Park and his coworkers, with visceral adiposity.6 Besides overall obesity, the deposition of visceral adipose tissue is a major factor responsible for the control of chronic inflammation state in obese patients. Therefore, a decrease in visceral adiposity may prevent patients from cardiovascular diseases.6

To date, for the expression of IL-6 in confirmed patients there were proposed methods such as: electrochemical immunoassay,10 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),11,12 fluorescent microarray,13 conductometric immunosensor,14 chemiluminescence immunoassay,15 and fluorescence-based fiber-optic biosensors.16 All these methods need complicated instrumentation, expensive reagents and extra-qualified personnel. Their limits of detection are sometime too high for the normal levels in fluids such saliva or cerebrospinal liquid, especially if these samples are belonging to children. Therefore, it is a real need to develop new methods of analysis of such IL-6 in biological fluids.

In the past years, electrochemical methods have attracted the interest of the researchers, as a response to these concerns. The advantages of electrochemical methods are: high sensitivity, good selectivity, very low limits of detection, simple use and cheaper reagents. Some electrochemical methods and their low limit of detection are presented in Table 1. Furthermore, developments of a new class of sensors – stochastic sensors allowed reliable identification of the analytes in the biological fluid based on their signature, followed by their quantification.17

Table 1 Electrochemical methods used for IL-6 detection
Sensor Method Limit of detection Sample Reference
SWCNTs/AbIL-6/HRP Electrochemical sandwich immunoassay 0.5 pg mL−1 Calf serum Malhotra et al., 2010
AuNPs Electrochemical immunosensor 2.0 pg mL−1 Human serum Deng et al., 2011
AbIL-6/SWCNTFs ECL immunosensor 0.25 pg mL−1 Sardesai et al., 2011
AuNPs/HCPE Electrochemical immunosensor 0.033 pg mL−1 Zhang et al., 2011
ERGO-AuPdNPs/AgNPs/HCPE Electrochemical immunosensor 0.059 pg mL−1 Lou et al., 2014
PS@PDAmetalNCs-GNR/HSPCE Electrochemical multi-analyte immunoassay 0.1 pg mL−1 Shi et al., 2014


In this paper we proposed three stochastic sensors based on a novel fabric material which can detect with high sensitivity IL-6 in whole blood samples, based on its signature.

Experimental

Materials and reagents

All chemicals were of analytical grade. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and maltodextrins (MD-1, MD-2, MD-3) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. IL-6 was reconstituted in 0.1 mL of deionized water. IL-6 solutions of different concentrations (10−6 to 10−15 g mL−1) were prepared in buffer solution (PBS, pH = 7.4) using serial dilution method. The IL-6 solutions were used for 3 months, when stored in the fridge (2–8 °C) when not used for measurements.

Apparatus and methods

All measurements were performed with an AUTOLAB/PGSTAT 302N (Utrecht, The Netherlands) connected to a personal computer with a GPES software, used to record the measurements. A three electrode system electrochemical cell was employed, formed from the working electrode, Ag/AgCl (0.1 mol L−1 KCl) as the reference electrode in the cell and a platinum wire as the counter electrode in the cell, respectively.

Design of stochastic microsensors based on veil material

The design of the sensor based on veil textile was made to be suitable also for applications like in vivo analysis and also in baby's pampers for fast screening of urine for IL-6. Therefore, we used a silver layer to serve as electric contact, and carbon like diamond (one of the most biocompatible materials) to serve as matrix for the sensor. Maltodextrin (having a structure varying from a closed helix to a coil) are also biocompatible, and non-toxic substances, which can assure good channels for applications in stochastic sensing.

The veil textile was covered first with a layer of silver, and the active side was covered with a layer of carbon like diamond (Fig. 1). Layer-by-layer deposition was used for the active side of the sensor. Polyester textile was coated with a layer of diamond-like carbon on top of a conductive silver layer using anodic arc plasma, in vacuum. The main asset of this type of plasma is the fact that the plasma plume does not fill the vacuum chamber volume (it is localized). Temperature sensitive substrates such as polyester are not immersed into the plasma and can therefore be coated. The operation principle of this plasma source consists on evaporation of the material to be deposited by electron-bombardment and ignition of a plasma in the vapors thus created, using high voltage.18,19


image file: c5ra04777c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Design of the veil based stochastic sensor. (a) General shape; (b) layer-by-layer deposition: 1 – textile fiber; 2 – silver layer; 3 – carbon like diamond layer.

A SEM image of coated polyester textile is presented in Fig. 2. As can be observed, the coating material penetrates through the fine fibers composing a textile thread and bonds them such that a continuous conductive fiber is obtained.


image file: c5ra04777c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM image of the textile fiber.

The silver side was used as electrical contact, while the carbon side was used as the sensing part. The carbon side was modified with three types of maltodextrines having different dextrose equivalences, MD-1, MD-2, and MD-3 by immersion into 10−3 mol L−1 maltodextrines solutions (MD-1, MD-2, or MD-3) for 24 hours. After the immersion, the fabric pieces were left to dry, at room temperature, for another 12 hours. A C-veil piece of fabric, modified with maltodextrine can be used for one day with high reliability (RSD (%) for sensitivity is lower than 0.1%). After a day, the sensitivity drops, RSD (%) values recorded for the sensitivity for between day's measurements being higher than 47.0%. Before each measurement, the fabric-based sensors were cleaned with deionized water. When not in use, they were kept at room temperature, in a dry place.

Stochastic mode

All measurements were carried out at 25 °C. The applied potential was 125 mV vs. Ag/AgCl. The signatures of IL-6 (toff value) in Table 2 were used for its identification in the diagrams obtained from whole blood samples. Calibration equations: 1/ton = a + b × ConcIL-6 were recorded and used for the assay of the unknown concentration of IL-6 in whole blood samples.
Table 2 Response characteristics of stochastic sensors based on C-veil and different types of maltodextrines, for the assay of IL-6a
Sensor based on C-veil and Calibration equation and correlation coefficient (r)* Linear concentration range (g mL−1) Limit of determination (g mL−1) Sensitivity (s−1 g−1 mL−1)
a All measurements are the average of ten determinations. * 〈1/ton〉 = s−1; 〈C〉 = g mL−1.
MD-1 1/ton = 0.038 + 3.31 × 104 × C, r = 0.9996 10−8 to 10−6 1 × 10−8 3.31(±0.01) × 104
MD-2 1/ton = 0.050 + 6.20 × 1011 × C, r = 0.9997 10−15 to 10−13 1 × 10−15 6.20(±0.03) × 1011
MD-3 1/ton = 0.133 + 6.62 × 104 × C, r = 0.9993 10−8 to 10−6 1 × 10−8 6.62(±0.03) × 104


Samples

Whole blood samples were obtained from obese patients, collected at the University Hospital in Bucharest. All experiments for method validation involving real whole blood samples were performed in compliance with the relevant laws and institutional guidelines, with the University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest ethics committee approval no. 11/2013. Informed consent was obtained for any experimentation with human subjects.

The whole blood samples (1–2 mL) were analyzed as collected from patients, without any pretreatment.

Results and discussions

Response characteristics of stochastic sensors

Three modified C-veil based sensors were tested for the assay of IL-6 using stochastic mode. A potential of 125 mV vs. Ag/AgCl and the response was recorded. The response of the sensors is based on current conductivity: on the first stage, IL-6 is blocking the channel and the current is dropping to zero until all the molecule is entering in the channel – the time spend on the first stage is the signature of IL-6 (toff value, Fig. 3 and 4). The second stage is related to quantitative measurement of the concentration of IL-6 – binding process with the wall of the channel is taking place:
Ch(i) + IL-6(i) ⇔ Ch·IL-6(i)
where Ch is the channel, and i is the interface, followed by redox processes; the time spend in the channel by IL-6 is the ton value (Fig. 3 and 4). This value is used accordingly with the stochastic mode described above to evaluate the performances of the stochastic sensors such as: linear concentration range, limit of determination, sensitivity.

image file: c5ra04777c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Current development for stochastic sensors.

image file: c5ra04777c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Diagrams obtained for the assay of interleukin-6 in whole blood samples using the sensors based on diamond-like carbon based veil impregnated with: (a) MD-1, (b) MD-2, and (c) MD-3.

The response characteristics of the proposed stochastic sensors were shown in Table 2. The signatures of IL-6 determined using different stochastic sensing assays are given by the values of toff (Table 2) which are different for each sensor, and depend on the length, size, geometry of the molecule, as well as its velocity to go inside the channel.

As shown in Table 2 the lowest limit of determination (1 fg mL−1) and the highest sensibility (6.20 × 1011 s−1 g−1 mL−1) were obtained when the MD-2 modified C-veil based sensor was used. Low values for the RSD (%) values of sensitivity were recorded, these proving the stability and accuracy of the proposed sensors. This sensor showed a better stability and a better signal than the other two sensors, in experimental measurements. This response of the sensor based on MD-2 can be correlated with the structure of MD-2 which is between tide helix (MD-1) and coil (MD-3), and favorized a better chemistry inside its channel.

Comparing the results presented in Tables 1 and 2, the sensor based on MD-2 present a lower limit of determination than those shown by the methods in Table 1.

Each sensor can only be used for one day, when more than 50 measurements were performed; for these measurements the RSD (%) recorded for sensitivity were less than 0.1%. In between days, the RSD (%) recorded for the sensitivity was higher than 47%, showing that the sensors based on veil cannot be used. Accordingly, the lifetime of the sensors designed is 1 day.

Selectivity was checked versus two other cytokines: MCP-1 and TNF-α, as well as versus some adipokines like leptin and PAI-1. For these substances were obtained different toff values, proving that the proposed sensors are selective.

Analytical applications

The proposed sensors were used for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples. Diagrams were recorded and values of toff and ton were measured (Fig. 4). First of all was identified in the diagram the signal given by IL-6 based on its signature (toff value), followed by the assay of ton value used accordingly with stochastic mode shown above, to determine its concentration.

Recovery tests were performed for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples. Different amounts of IL-6 were added to the whole blood samples to give certain concentrations. The results shown in Table 3 proved that IL-6 an be reliable assaied in whole blood samples: the accuracy of measurements were demonstrated by recoveries of IL-6 which were higher than 97.00%, while the precision was given by the RSD (%) values for recovery tests and for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples – RSD (%) values being lower than 0.40%.

Table 3 Determination of IL-6 in whole blood samplesa
Sample no. Modifier Paired t-test
MD-1 MD-2 MD-3
IL-6, ng mL−1
a All results are the average of four measurements.
1 4.0 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 0.2 2.04
2 3.0 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.1 2.56
3 1.0 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 1.34
4 3.0 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.2 1.25
5 6.0 ± 0.1 6.3 ± 0.1 5.2 ± 0.2 3.02
6 6.2 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.2 6.0 ± 0.2 0.96
7 18.0 ± 0.3 20.0 ± 0.3 17.1 ± 0.1 3.07
8 1.7 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 1.01
9 11.0 ± 0.3 10.9 ± 0.2 10.7 ± 0.2 2.23
10 14.0 ± 0.2 13.8 ± 0.2 13.0 ± 0.2 2.20
Recovery% 99.98 ± 0.11 98.65 ± 0.10 97.62 ± 0.13


Paired t-test at 99.00% confidence level was performed for the results obtained for the assay of IL-6 in ten whole blood samples (Table 3). All values calculated for pair-t test at the 99.00% confidence level are less than the tabulated theoretical value: 4.032. Accordingly, there is no statistically significant difference between the results obtained using the proposed sensors at 99.00% confidence level, for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples.

Conclusions

This paper proposed three sensors based on a novel fabric material used for stochastic sensing of interleukin-6 in whole blood samples. Three maltodextrines (MD-1, MD-2 and MD-3) with different dextrose equivalence were used to modify the diamond-like carbon based veil sensor. The best performances were recorded for the sensors obtained using MD-2: a limit of determination of 1 fg mL−1 and a high sensitivity. Even though these proposed novel stochastic sensors are disposable sensors (they can be used one day), they showed very good response characteristics, making them reliable for the assay of IL-6 in whole blood samples. The attractive performance of these novel stochastic sensors suggested potential application towards the early evaluation of cancer, inflammation disorders and obesity.

Abbreviations

SWCNTsSingle walled carbon nanotubes
SWCNTFsSingle walled carbon nanotubes forests
ECLElectrochemiluminescence
AbAnti-body
HRPHorseradish peroxidase
HCPEHeated carbon paste electrode
NPsNanoparticles
ERGOElectrochemically reduced graphene oxide
GNRGraphene nanoribbon
PSPolymer
NCsNanocomposites
HSPCEHeated screen-printed carbon electrode

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by UEFISCDI PNII Program Ideas 2011–2014, Contract no. 123/05.10.2011 and by PNII Ideas project number PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0953. Livia Alexandra Gugoasa thanks for the financial support of Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007–2013 of the Ministry of European Funds through the Financial Agreement POSDRU/159/1.5/S/134398.

References

  1. R. Malhotra, V. Patel, J. P. Vaque, S. Gutkind and J. F. Rusling, Anal. Chem., 2010, 82, 3118 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. W. Somers, M. Stahl and J. S. Seehra, EMBO J., 1997, 16, 989 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. T. Kishimoto, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 2005, 23, 1 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. K. Ishihara and T. Hirano, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 2002, 13, 357 CrossRef CAS.
  5. D. Reynaud, E. Pietras, K. Barry-Holson, A. Mir, M. Binnenwies, M. Jeanne, O. Sala-Torra, J. P. Radich and E. Passegue, Cancer Cell, 2011, 20, 661 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. H. S. Park, J. Y. Park and R. Yu, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 2005, 69, 29 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. V. Mohamed-Ali, S. Goodrick, A. Rawesh, D. R. Katz, J. M. Miles and J. S. Yudkin, et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 1997, 82, 4196 CAS.
  8. R. S. Ahima and J. S. Flier, Trends Endocrinol. Metab., 2000, 11, 327 CrossRef CAS.
  9. J. S. Yudkin, C. D. Stehouwer, J. J. Emeis and S. W. Coppack, Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 1999, 19, 972 CrossRef CAS.
  10. Y. Lou, T. He, F. Jiang, J. J. Shi and J. J. Zhu, Talanta, 2014, 122, 135 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. C. K. Turner, T. M. Blieden, T. J. Smith, S. E. Feldon, D. C. Foster, P. J. Sime and R. P. Phipps, J. Immunol. Methods, 2004, 291, 63 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. G. A. Messina, N. V. Panini, N. A. Martinez and J. Raba, Anal. Biochem., 2008, 380, 262 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. H. Wu, Q. Huo, S. Varnum, J. Wang, G. Liu, Z. Nie, J. Liu and Y. Lin, Analyst, 2008, 133, 1550 RSC.
  14. K. Liang, W. Mu, M. Huang, Z. Yu and Q. Lai, Electroanalysis, 2006, 18, 1505 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. L. R. Luo, Z. J. Zhang, L. Y. Hou, J. Wang and W. Tian, Talanta, 2007, 72, 1293 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. R. Kapoor and C. W. Wang, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2009, 24, 2696 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. H. Bayley, O. Braha and L.-Q. Gu, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 139 CrossRef CAS.
  18. C. Surdu-Bob, I. Mustat and C. Iacob, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 2007, 9, 2932 CAS.
  19. C. Surdu-Bob, R. Vladoiu, M. Badulescu and G. Musa, Diamond Relat. Mater., 2008, 17, 1625 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.