High strength nanocomposite hydrogel bilayer with bidirectional bending and shape switching behaviors for soft actuators

Bo Xu, Haoyang Jiang, Huanjun Li*, Gongzheng Zhang* and Qingshan Zhang
School of Chemical Engineering and Environment, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China. E-mail: lihj@bit.edu.cn; zgongz99@bit.edu.cn

Received 14th November 2014 , Accepted 19th January 2015

First published on 20th January 2015


Abstract

We report on a type of TiO2 cross-linked nanocomposite hydrogel bilayer with bidirectional bending and shape switching behaviors that could be used as a soft actuator.


Stimuli-responsive hydrogels have become the focus of hydrogel research over the past decades because of their ability to show volume changes in response to external stimuli such as temperature,1 pH,2 salt,3 electric field4 and light.5 They have been widely used as building blocks in various applications including tissue engineering,6 controlled drug delivery,7 cell releasing8 as well as biosensors.9 In recent years, stimuli-responsive hydrogels showing shape changing behaviors (e.g., bending and twisting) other than simple homogeneous swelling/de-swelling have aroused new scientific interest for their great potential to be used as soft actuators in biomedical applications.10 For example, Gao et al. reported electric-sensitive graphene oxide/polyacrylamide hydrogels which exhibited bending behavior in an electric field.11 Stark et al. prepared a kind of magnetic field-driven actuator by direct incorporation of metal nanoparticles into the backbone of hydrogels.12 Lee et al. synthesized near-infrared light-driven hydrogel actuators by interfacing genetically engineered elastin-like polypeptides with reduced-graphene oxide sheets.13 Despite their unique properties, the actuation of these hydrogels can only be realized in directional fields due to their macroscopically homogeneous structures, which badly limited their biomedical applications under non-directional stimuli. Therefore, it remains a big challenge to fabricate hydrogel based soft actuators which could reveal shape changing abilities in isotropic environments.

It is well-known that some plants are able to display bending or twisting behaviors by simple taking up or releasing of water due to their inhomogeneous structures.14–16 Inspired by these plants, researchers have developed some hydrogel materials that can display bending behaviors based on bilayer structures. This method was first reported by Hu et al., who prepared a kind of spatial modulated bigel by limiting interpenetration of part of polyacrylamide (PAM) gel network with poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) gel network. The obtained bigel strip could bend almost into a circle in response to increased temperature.17 In another study, Gracias et al. described the fabrication of photopatterned actuators consisting of stimuli-responsive hydrogel bilayers made from N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM), acrylic acid (AA) and polyethylene oxide diacrylate (PEODA).18 The resulting actuators could fold and unfold into three dimensional (3D) structures in response to the changing of aqueous conditions. Recently, Sun et al. also prepared a bigel strip showing a bending behaviour in response to a temperature increase, via a direct combination through molecular recognition of two individual hydrogel strips with different temperature sensitivity.19 Shim et al. fabricated a chemo-responsive bilayer actuator film showing reversible curling/un-curling actuation in both water and ethanol due to the expansion and contraction of the polymer layer in the respective solvents.20 However, although these hydrogel bilayer materials successfully achieved stimuli-induced shape bending behaviors, they could only response to one type of stimulus and achieve unidirectional bending. Furthermore, all of these bilayers were prepared from conventional chemically cross-linked hydrogels with poor mechanical properties, which greatly limited their utilization as soft actuators in load-bearing systems.

Recently, we have demonstrated that TiO2 nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) could be employed as inorganic cross-linking agents to prepare high strength nanocomposite hydrogels via in situ free radical copolymerization of N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) with acrylic acid (AA) or acrylamide (AM).21,22 The cross-linking mechanisms were contributed to the complexations and hydrogen bonds between –COOH and –NH2 on polymer chains with –OH on the surface of TiO2 NPs, respectively. It was found that the swelling ratios of the prepared hydrogels could be adjusted by changing the monomer ratios in the initial solutions. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that bilayers fabricated from TiO2 cross-linked hydrogels with different initial compositions could display bending behaviors when placed in water. However, in order to achieve bidirectional bending, we need to find another force to induce bending towards the opposite direction.

In this study, we synthesized a new type of TiO2 cross-linked nanocomposite hydrogels (TAN gels) by using AM and NIPAM as comonomers with the same procedure described in ref. 21. The TAN gels prepared by varying AM/NIPAM ratios were denoted as TANx gels, where x represents the mole ratio of AM in total monomer amount (100 × [AM]/([AM] + [NIPAM])). The detailed compositions of TAN gels were listed in Table S1 (see ESI). The resultant TAN gels also exhibited outstanding mechanical properties that can withstand large deformations, such elongation after knotting and compression, without breaking (Fig.1). Since it has been proven that the NIPAM cannot be used as the single monomer to prepare TiO2 cross-linked nanocomposite hydrogels,23 the cross-linking mechanism of TAN gels is also contributed to the hydrogen bonds between –NH2 groups on the polymer chains and –OH groups on TiO2 surface.22 Thus the relationship between mechanical properties and the monomer ratios (Table 1) is the same as that of hydrogels reported in ref. 22. That is, as the decreasing of AM ratio, the cross-linking density decreased, leading to the increasing of toughness of hydrogels. For example, the TAN100 gel, which was prepared by using only AM as monomer, can only be stretched to 234% of its original length. When it was compressed 95% of their original height, some cracks appeared after compression although the sample still looked like intact. By decreasing the AM ratio and introduction of NIPAM in the initial solutions, the elongations at break gradually increased and the cracks on hydrogels after compression also became smaller and smaller. For the TAN50 gel, TAN40 gel and TAN30 gel, the elongations at break increased to 1309%, 1970% and 2494%, respectively, showing tensile strengths ranging from around 40 kPa to more than 200 kPa. In addition, all of these gels can be compressed 95% without any sign of cracks, displaying compressive strengths between 1.9 MPa and 8.8 MPa. These values of mechanical properties were much higher than conventional chemically cross-linked hydrogels and comparable to those of nanocomposite hydrogels cross-linked by clay24,25 and other nanomaterials.26–28 This new type of nanocomposite hydrogels with excellent mechanical toughness and strength provides an ideal candidate for preparing soft actuators.


image file: c4ra14545c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Photographs of TAN gels. (a) Elongation after knotting; (b) under compression; (c) after compression.
Table 1 Mechanical Properties of TAN gels
Hydrogels Elongation at break/% Tensile strength/kPa Young's modulus/kPa Compressive strength/MPa Compressive modulus/kPa
TAN100 234.3 ± 10.6 93.1 ± 8.9 41.85 ± 1.51 5.16 ± 0.3 109.15 ± 2.56
TAN90 340.1 ± 13.8 111.1 ± 10.2 35.38 ± 1.42 5.89 ± 0.4 92.83 ± 2.05
TAN80 490.1 ± 17.4 120.9 ± 11.3 32.61 ± 1.34 6.20 ± 0.3 75.49 ± 1.95
TAN70 663.3 ± 18.4 128.3 ± 11.9 30.82 ± 2.03 6.77 ± 0.2 61.36 ± 1.56
TAN60 1111.5 ± 22.6 140.2 ± 12.8 26.98 ± 1.91 7.21 ± 0.4 52.98 ± 1.26
TAN50 1309.5 ± 27.0 197.2 ± 15.9 21.03 ± 2.14 8.81 ± 0.8 42.53 ± 1.35
TAN40 1970.7 ± 30.6 136.3 ± 11.5 14.37 ± 1.59 5.78 ± 0.5 33.32 ± 1.22
TAN30 2494.4 ± 41.2 41.2 ± 9.6 3.47 ± 1.05 1.94 ± 0.2 11.84 ± 1.03


The introduction of NIPAM in the initial solutions not only increased the mechanical toughness of the obtained TAN gels, but also influenced their swelling properties in different media. Fig. 2 displays the time-dependent swelling ratios of TAN gels in pure water and 20% NaCl solution. As anticipated, the TAN gels with higher NIPAM ratios showed higher swelling ratios in pure water due to the decreasing of cross-linking densities. However, when the TAN gels were immersed in 20% NaCl solution, all the NIPAM-contained TAN gels started to shrink instead of swell. The reason for this phenomenon can be contributed to the salt (NaCl)-induced decreasing of volume phase transition temperature (VPTT) of NIPAM-contained copolymer hydrogels.29 Here, it should be noted that TAN100 gel showed similar swelling behaviors in both pure water and 20% NaCl solution, indicating that the osmotic pressure has little influence on the shrinking behaviors of TAN gels in NaCl solution. Under the NaCl solution of 20%, the VPTTs of TAN gels were lower than room temperature (about 25 °C), therefore, hydrogels excluded inside water and shrank. Since the VPTTs of TAN gels were originated from the NIPAM unit in the copolymer matrix, the increasing of NIPAM ratio (decreasing of AM ratio) in hydrogel formulation would decrease the VPTTs of TAN gels under the same NaCl concentration. Thus, the TAN gels prepared from higher NIPAM ratios can release more water and show lower swelling ratios.


image file: c4ra14545c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Time-dependent swelling ratios of TAN gels in (a) pure water and (b) 20% NaCl solution.

From the swelling and shrinking curves of TAN gels measured in pure water and 20% NaCl solution, it can be found that TAN gels (e.g., TAN30 gel and TAN50 gel) which showed higher swelling ratios in pure water displayed lower swelling ratios in 20% NaCl solution, whereas hydrogels (e.g., TAN70 gel and TAN100 gel) showing lower swelling ratios in pure water maintained higher swelling ratios in 20% NaCl solution. Taking advantage of this finding, we designed and synthesized a hydrogel bilayer, using the formulation of TAN50 gel and TAN30 gel, which could show different stimuli-responsive bending behaviors in pure water and 20% NaCl solutions. As shown in Fig. 3, when the bilayer strip was placed in pure water, both of the two layers would swell while TAN30 gel showed larger swelling ratio than TAN50 gel. These uneven swellings of each layer leaded to the bending of bilayer strip towards the side of TAN50 gel, and ultimately formed a swelling hydrogel circle. In contrast, when the bilayer was immersed in 20% NaCl solution, it bended towards the side of TAN30 and formed a shrinking hydrogel circle because the TAN30 displayed lower swelling ratio compared with TAN50 gel. That is to say, the bilayer strip is able to show bidirectional bending behaviors responding to different stimuli, which is more prospective to be used as soft actuators than bilayer hydrogels mentioned above.18–20 Furthermore, because the swelling and shrinking behaviors of TAN gels are reversible, the formed hydrogel circles are able to automatically switch between each other when they are placed in pure water and 20% NaCl solution, alternately, showing reversible shape switching property.


image file: c4ra14545c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Schematic representation of bidirectional bending and shape switching behaviors of hydrogel bilayer (black layer: TAN50 gel; blue layer: TAN30 gel).

Fig.4 demonstrates the utilization of prepared hydrogel bilayer strip as soft actuators to deliver a Teflon ring from 20% NaCl solution to pure water. Two pieces of bilayer strips were tied together on an iron hook and hung over a glass beaker with a Teflon ring between two strips. When the beaker was filled with 20% NaCl solution, the bilayer strip bended upwards into a circle and held the ring. After the circled strips were transferred to pure water alone with the iron hook, the Teflon ring was released as the bilayer strip swelled and started to bend to the other direction. Because of their reversible shape switching property, the bilayer strips can be reused to deliver another Teflon ring, which means that the bilayer strips could actuate repeatedly by transferring them between those two media.


image file: c4ra14545c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Illustration of potential application of hydrogel bilayer used as soft actuators.

In summary, we have prepared a novel type of hydrogel bilayer with unique bidirectional bending and shape switching behaviors based on high strength TiO2 cross-linked nanocomposite hydrogels. The hydrogel bilayer is able to bend to opposite directions to form hydrogel circles in pure water and 20% NaCl solution due to the different swelling and shrinking behaviors of each layer. The formed hydrogel circles could reversible switch between each other when they were placed in pure water and 20% NaCl solution, alternately. This novel kind of bilayer with high mechanical strength and unique properties would have great potential to be used as soft actuators in load-bearing system.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21174017), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China (2102040), the Cultivation Project for Technology Innovation Program of BIT (2011CX01032), the Development Program for Distinguished Young and Middle-aged Teachers of BIT.

Notes and references

  1. W. G. Liu, B. Q. Zhang, W. W. Lu, X. W. Li, D. W. Zhu, K. De Yao, Q. Wang, C. R. Zhao and C. D. Wang, Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 3005–3012 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. P. Gupta, K. Vermani and S. Garg, Drug Discovery Today, 2002, 7, 569–579 CrossRef CAS.
  3. C. Chang, M. He, J. Zhou and L. Zhang, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 1642–1648 CrossRef CAS.
  4. R. V. Kulkarni and S. A. Biswanath, J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater., 2007, 5, 125–139 CAS.
  5. Y. L. Zhao and J. F. Stoddart, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 8442–8446 CrossRef CAS.
  6. K. Y. Lee and D. J. Mooney, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1869–1879 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y. Qiu and K. Park, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2012, 64, 49–60 CrossRef PubMed.
  8. Y. Hou, A. R. Matthews, A. M. Smitherman, A. S. Bulick, M. S. Hahn, H. Hou, A. Han and M. A. Grunlan, Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 3175–3184 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. J. E. Meiring, M. J. Schmid, S. M. Grayson, B. M. Rathsack, D. M. Johnson, R. Kirby, R. Kannappan, K. Manthiram, B. Hsia, Z. L. Hogan, A. D. Ellington, M. V. Pishko and C. G. Willson, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 5574–5580 CrossRef CAS.
  10. M. E. Harmon, M. Tang and C. W. Frank, Polymer, 2003, 44, 4547–4556 CrossRef CAS.
  11. N. Zhang, R. Li, L. Zhang, H. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Wu, X. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zhao and J. Gao, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 7231–7239 RSC.
  12. R. Fuhrer, E. K. Athanassiou, N. A. Luechinger and W. J. Stark, Small, 2009, 5, 383–388 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. E. Wang, M. S. Desai and S.-W. Lee, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 2826–2830 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. Dawson, J. F. V. Vincent and A. M. Rocca, Nature, 1997, 390, 668 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. R. Elbaum, L. Zaltzman, I. Burgert and P. Fratzl, Science, 2007, 316, 884–886 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. D. Evangelista, S. Hotton and J. Dumais, J. Exp. Biol., 2011, 214, 521–529 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. Z. B. Hu, X. M. Zhang and Y. Li, Science, 1995, 269, 525–527 CAS.
  18. N. Bassik, B. T. Abebe, K. E. Laflin and D. H. Gracias, Polymer, 2010, 51, 6093–6098 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. J. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Sun and Q. Zhou, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 5750–5752 RSC.
  20. Y. Haldorai and J. J. Shim, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 2653–2659 RSC.
  21. B. Xu, H. Li, Y. Wang, G. Zhang and Q. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 7233–7236 RSC.
  22. B. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Li, G. Zhang and Q. Zhang, Polym. Compos., 2014 DOI:10.1002/pc.23238.
  23. K. Haraguchi, H. J. Li, K. Matsuda, T. Takehisa and E. Elliott, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 3482–3490 CrossRef CAS.
  24. K. Haraguchi, T. Takehisa and S. Fan, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 10162–10171 CrossRef CAS.
  25. K. Haraguchi, R. Farnworth, A. Ohbayashi and T. Takehisa, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 5732–5741 CrossRef CAS.
  26. R. Q. Liu, S. M. Liang, X. Z. Tang, D. Yan, X. F. Li and Z. Z. Yu, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 14160–14167 RSC.
  27. J. Yang, C. R. Han, J. F. Duan, M. G. Ma, X. M. Zhang, F. Xu, R. C. Sun and X. M. Xie, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 22467–22480 RSC.
  28. J. Yang, C. R. Han, J. F. Duan, M. G. Ma, X. M. Zhang, F. Xu and R. C. Sun, Cellulose, 2013, 20, 227–237 CrossRef CAS.
  29. X. M. Liu, L. S. Wang, L. Wang, J. C. Huang and C. B. He, Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 5659–5666 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Materials, detailed compositions of hydrogels, synthesis of hydrogel bilayer. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra14545c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.