DOI:
10.1039/C4RA14394A
(Communication)
RSC Adv., 2015,
5, 8002-8005
Copper-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of arylamides and β-diketones: new synthesis of 2,4,5-trisubstituted oxazoles†
Received
12th November 2014
, Accepted 18th December 2014
First published on 19th December 2014
Abstract
A novel copper catalyzed approach to oxazoles via enamide intermediates was developed from benzamides and β-diketones. The successive condensation and cyclization reactions afforded various 2,4,5-trisubstituted oxazoles in good yields.
Substituted oxazoles are an important class of heterocycles that are ubiquitous in biologically active molecules, including natural products, agrochemicals and pharmaceutical drugs.1 A large number of oxazole-containing natural products have been isolated from marine invertebrates and microorganisms.2 Moreover, many synthetic trisubstituted oxazoles have been evaluated to show activity against diabetes, breast cancer and pancreatic cancer (Fig. 1).3 Consequently, great effort has been paid on the development of efficient synthetic methods to access substituted oxazoles, and most of the existed methods are using ketone derivatives as the starting materials.4 Traditionally, a range of highly substituted and complex oxazoles are prepared via cyclodehydration of α-acylaminoketones, esters, or amides (the Robinson–Gabriel oxazole synthesis).5 Nevertheless, this method requires the use of highly functionalized diketone substrates (Scheme 1a). Additionally, catalytic decomposition of α-diazocarbonyl compounds in nitriles,6 photolysis and pyrolysis of N-acylisoozalones7 can provide alternative procedures for the preparation of functionalized oxazole derivatives. Transition metals such as copper,8 rhodium,9 ruthenium10 and gold11 are successfully used as the cyclization catalysts to afford various substituted oxazoles.
 |
| | Fig. 1 Selected oxazole-containing drugs. | |
 |
| | Scheme 1 Various procedures for multi-substituted oxazole synthesis. | |
In recent years, enamides bearing β-vinylic C-heteroatom bonds are proved to be versatile cyclization precursors to construct the oxazole ring (Scheme 1b).12 The groups of Buchwald and Stahl reported copper-mediated oxidative cyclization of enamides to 2,5-disubstituted oxazoles via vinylic C–H functionalization.13 This method provided a more direct approach to substituted oxazoles by avoiding the substrate functionalization. However, some highly functionalized enamide precursors require several steps to prepare. Therefore, the in situ formation of enamides from readily available starting materials such as β-diketones is highly desirable for one pot construction of oxazoles. There are only few reports on multi-substituted oxazole synthesis from β-diketones and arylamides or benzyl amines.14 Moreover, a leaving group need to be introduced into the α-position of β-diketones. Efficient method to prepare multi-substituted oxazoles in one pot from β-diketones without leaving substituents is highly desirable. Herein, we report an efficient copper-catalyzed oxidative cyclization strategy from readily available benzamides and β-diketones (via enamide intermediate), providing the 2,4,5-trisubstituted oxazoles in good yields (Scheme 1c).15 In the whole process, the acyl functional group is retained and located selectively at the ortho position of the oxygen atom.16
In the first experiment we examined the reaction between benzamide (1a) and pentane-2,4-dione (2a) in toluene using molecular oxygen as the oxidant. As shown in Table 1, four different copper salts were screened using p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH) as the acidic additive. Among the catalysts investigated, CuBr showed the best efficiency (entries 1–4). Various oxidants were investigated instead of oxygen using CuBr as the catalyst (entries 5–8). Among the various oxidants screened, K2S2O8 showed the best activity and its use improved the reaction yield to 24% (entry 7). The choice of acidic additive is very important, and the product 3a could be obtained in 46% yield when acetic acid was used (entry 10). Slightly higher yield was obtained when the reaction was carried out in Cl2CHCHCl2 (entry 14). The reaction yield increased from 51% to 64% when the ratio of 1a
:
2a changed to 2
:
1 (entry 15). The desired product could be obtained in 82% yield when the reaction temperature increased from 120 °C to 140 °C (entry 16). Compared with CuBr2, CuBr showed better efficiency (entries 16 and 17).
Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditionsa

|
| Entry |
Catalyst |
Oxidant |
Additive |
Solvent |
Yieldb [%] |
| Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), catalyst (20 mol%), oxidant (2.0 equiv.), additive (2.0 equiv.), solvent (0.4 mL), 120 °C, 36 h under argon (under oxygen for entries 1–4). GC yield based on 1a. 1a (0.4 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), yield based on 2a. At 140 °C. |
| 1 |
Cu(OAc)2 |
O2 |
TsOH |
Toluene |
8 |
| 2 |
CuSO4 |
O2 |
TsOH |
Toluene |
7 |
| 3 |
CuBr2 |
O2 |
TsOH |
Toluene |
11 |
| 4 |
CuBr |
O2 |
TsOH |
Toluene |
12 |
| 5 |
CuBr |
DDQ |
TsOH |
Toluene |
Trace |
| 6 |
CuBr |
TBHP |
TsOH |
Toluene |
5 |
| 7 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
TsOH |
Toluene |
24 |
| 8 |
CuBr |
Dess–Martin |
TsOH |
Toluene |
7 |
| 9 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CF3COOH |
Toluene |
11 |
| 10 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
Toluene |
46 |
| 11 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
PivOH |
Toluene |
32 |
| 12 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
DMF |
10 |
| 13 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
1,4-Dioxane |
44 |
| 14 |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
Cl2CHCHCl2 |
51 |
| 15c |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
Cl2CHCHCl2 |
64 |
| 16c,d |
CuBr |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
Cl2CHCHCl2 |
82 |
| 17c,d |
CuBr2 |
K2S2O8 |
CH3COOH |
Cl2CHCHCl2 |
70 |
The scope of this reaction was studied under the optimized conditions (Table 2). Arylamides with electron-donating group at the para position smoothly coupled with pentane-2,4-dione (2a) to give the heterocyclic products in high yields (entries 1–4). When halogen substituents presented at the para position of amides, the corresponding products were obtained in fairly good yields (entries 5–7). For example, 68% yield of 3g which could be converted to other useful compounds easily was obtained when an active bromo substituent existed. Strong electron-withdrawing substituent significantly decreased the reaction yield. For example, when 4-nitrobenzamide (1h) was used in the reaction, the desired product 3h was observed in only 38% yield (entry 8). Similar yield was observed when the methyl substituent shifted from para to meta position (entries 2 and 9).
Table 2 Reaction of pentane-2,4-dione (2a) with various aromatic amidesa
The scope of the reaction with β-diketones is outlined in Table 3. 1,3-Diphenylpropane-1,3-dione (2b) reacted with benzamide to give (2,4-diphenyloxazol-5-yl)(phenyl)methanone (3j) in 81% yield (entry 1). Besides symmetrical β-diketones, various unsymmetrical β-diketones were also employed in the oxidative cyclization reaction, providing the corresponding products in moderate to good yields (entries 2–9). For regioselectivity of the unsymmetrical β-diketones, the steric hindrance is a key factor. In all cases, 5-acyl substituted oxazoles were the major products. When 1-(naphthalen-1-yl)butane-1,3-dione (2h) was used, the 5-acyl substituted oxazole 3p was obtained almost as the sole product (entry 7). Furthermore, extension of this reaction to heteroaryl β-diketones proved to be successful (entry 8). It is important to point out that changing the substituting position on the aromatic ring of 1-phenylbutane-1,3-dione (2c) greatly influenced the reaction yields of the corresponding products (entries 6 and 9). Unfortunately, no desired product was observed when β-diketone was replaced by ethyl acetoacetate.
Table 3 Reactions of 1a with various β-diketonesa

|
| Entry |
Ketone |
Product |
Yieldb [%] |
| Conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), CuBr (20 mol%), K2S2O8 (2.0 equiv.), AcOH (2.0 equiv.), Cl2CHCHCl2 (0.4 mL), 140 °C, 36 h under argon. Isolated yield based on 2. 48 h. |
| 1c |
2b: R2 = R3 = Ph |
3j |
81 |
| 2 |
2c: R2 = Ph, R3 = CH3 |
3k : 3k′ (3 : 1) |
82 |
| 3 |
2d: R2 = 4-Me–C6H5, R3 = CH3 |
3l : 3l′ (4 : 1) |
81 |
| 4 |
2e: R2 = 4-MeO–C6H5, R3 = CH3 |
3m : 3m′ (4 : 1) |
76 |
| 5 |
2f: R2 = 4-F–C6H5, R3 = CH3 |
3n : 3n′ (3 : 1) |
66 |
| 6 |
2g: R2 = 4-Cl–C6H5, R3 = CH3 |
3o : 3o′ (4 : 1) |
73 |
| 7 |
2h: R2 = 1-naphthyl, R3 = CH3 |
3p : 3p′ (80 : 1) |
75 |
| 8 |
2i: R2 = 2-thienyl, R3 = CH3 |
3q : 3q′ (8 : 1) |
77 |
| 9 |
2j: R2 = 2-Cl–C6H5, R3 = CH3 |
3r : 3r′ (4 : 1) |
50 |
A series of control experiments were designed to investigate the reaction mechanism (Scheme 2). When the reaction of 1a with 2a was stopped after 2 h, 4a and 3a were obtained in 8% and 9% yields, respectively (Scheme 2a). The starting materials could be smoothly converted into the desired product 3a with extension of time whereas no significant change was observed for intermediate 4a (Scheme 2b). The isolated 4a could be further transformed into 3a in 80% yield under the standard reaction conditions (Scheme 2c). These results suggested that enamide might be the key intermediate during the formation of oxazoles. Only trace amounts of 3a and 4a were observed when two equiv. of TEMPO was added to the reaction mixture (Scheme 2d). This means that a radical process was possibly involved in this transformation. Based on these competition experiments and related literatures,13 a possible mechanism to illustrate this reaction is presented in Scheme 3. Condensation of 1a with 2a yields an enamide intermediate 4a which can be further converted into a radical cation A in the presence of Cu(II), and Cu(I) is released and oxidized into Cu(II). The cyclization of A generates intermediate B. Subsequent oxidation of the intermediate B by Cu(II) provides the product 3a and releases Cu(I) which can be re-oxidized to participate the next catalytic cycle.
 |
| | Scheme 2 Control experiments. | |
 |
| | Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism. | |
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have developed a novel approach for the synthesis of oxazoles using CuBr as the catalyst. Readily available β-diketones and primary arylamides were used as the starting materials. 5-Acyl substituted oxazoles were obtained as the sole products in all cases. Halogen substituted benzamides also could be employed for this kind of transformation. This strategy affords an efficient approach for the synthesis of biologically active oxazoles with acyl substituents from readily available starting materials with cheap and low toxic copper catalyst. The generality and synthetic applications of this methodology are under investigation.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21172185, 21372187), the Hunan Provincial Innovative Foundation for Postgraduate (CX2014B258), the New Century Excellent Talents in University from Ministry of Education of China (NCET-11-0974) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China, Ministry of Education of China (20124301110005).
Notes and references
-
(a) D. C. Palmer and E. C. Taylor, The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. Oxazoles: Synthesis, Reactions, and Spectroscopy, Parts A & B, Wiley, New Jersey, 2004, vol. 60 Search PubMed;
(b) I. J. Turchi, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1981, 20, 32 CrossRef CAS;
(c) I. J. Turchi and M. J. S. Dewar, Chem. Rev., 1975, 75, 389 CrossRef CAS;
(d) J. Zhang and M. A. Ciufolini, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 390 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(e) B. Wang, T. M. Hansen, L. Weyer, D. Wu, T. Wang, M. Christmann, Y. Lu, L. Ying, M. M. Engler, R. D. Cink, C. S. Lee, F. Ahmed and C. J. Forsyth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 1506 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) N. Lindquist, W. Fenical, G. D. Van Duyne and J. Clardy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 2303 CrossRef CAS;
(b) Z. Cruz-Monserrate, H. C. Vervoort, R. L. Bai, D. Newman, S. B. Howell, G. Los, J. T. Mullaney, M. D. Williams, G. R. Pettit, W. Fenical and E. Hamel, Mol. Pharmacol., 2003, 63, 1273 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) J. Kobayashi, M. Tsuda, H. Fuse, T. Sasaki and Y. Mikami, J. Nat. Prod., 1997, 60, 150 CrossRef CAS;
(d) For selected examples on natural products synthesis containing 2,4-disubsituted oxazole moiety, see: J. Li, S. Jeong, L. Esser and P. G. Harran, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4765 CrossRef CAS;
(e) K. C. Nicolaou, D. Y. K. Chen, X. Huan, T. Ling, M. Bella and S. A. Snyder, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 12888 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(f) J. R. Davis, P. D. Kane and C. J. Moody, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 7305 CrossRef PubMed.
-
(a) Y. Momose, T. Maekawa, T. Yamano, M. Kawada, H. Odaka, H. Ikeda and T. Sohda, J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 1518 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) W. S. Yang, K. Shimada, D. Delva, M. Patel, E. Ode, R. Skouta and B. R. Stockwell, ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 35 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) A. Y. Shaw, M. C. Henderson, G. Flynn, B. Samulitis, H. Han, S. P. Stratton, H. H. S. Chow, L. H. Hurley and R. T. Dorr, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2009, 331, 636 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- For the classical synthetic methods to oxazoles, see:
(a) I. J. Turchi and M. J. S. Dewar, Chem. Rev., 1975, 75, 389 CrossRef CAS;
(b) For the recent examples of synthetic methods to oxazoles, see: B. Shi, A. J. Blake, W. Lewis, I. B. Campbell, B. D. Judkins and C. J. Moody, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 152 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(c) W. He, C. Li and L. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 8482 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) I. Cano, E. Álvarez, M. C. Nicasio and P. J. Pérez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 191 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(e) J. Xie, H. Jiang, Y. Cheng and C. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 979 RSC;
(f) W. J. Xue, Q. Li, Y. P. Zhu, J. G. Wang and A. X. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3485 RSC;
(g) J. P. Weyrauch, A. S. K. Hashmi, A. Schuster, T. Hengst, S. Schetter, A. Littmann, M. Rudolph, M. Hamzic, J. Visus, F. Rominger, W. Frey and J. W. Bats, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 956 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(h) Z. Li, L. Ma, J. Xu, L. Kong, X. Wu and H. Yao, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3763 RSC;
(i) X. Liu, R. Cheng, F. F. Zhao, D. Zhang-Negrerie, Y. F. Du and K. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 5480 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(j) A. Herrera, R. Martínez-Alvarez, P. Ramiro, D. Molero and J. Almy, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 3026 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) R. Robinson, J. Chem. Soc., 1909, 2167 RSC;
(b) S. Gabriel, Chem. Ber., 1910, 43, 1283 CrossRef CAS;
(c) For selected recent examples, see: E. Biron, J. Chatterjee and H. Kessler, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2417 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) J. F. Sanz-Cervera, R. Blasco, J. Piera, M. Cynamon, I. Ibáñez, M. Murguía and S. Fustero, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 8988 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(e) M. J. Thompson, H. Adams and B. Chen, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 3856 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. P. Doyle, W. E. Buhro, J. G. Davidson, R. C. Elliot, J. W. Hoekstra and M. Oppenhuizen, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 3657 CrossRef CAS.
- R. H. Prager, J. A. Smith, B. Weber and C. M. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1997, 2665 RSC.
- R. Martín, A. Cuenca and S. L. Buchwald, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 5521 CrossRef PubMed.
- A. S. K. Hashmi, J. P. Weyrauch, W. Frey and J. W. Bats, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4391 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. D. Milton, Y. Inada, Y. Nishibayashi and S. Uemura, Chem. Commun., 2004, 2712 RSC.
-
(a) B. Clapham, C. Spanka and K. D. Janda, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 2173 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) Y. R. Lee, S. H. Yeon, Y. Seo and B. S. Kim, Synthesis, 2004, 2787 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- For the cyclization of enamides bearing β-vinylic carbonheteroatom bonds, see the following: (i) C–Br bond:
(a) C. Shin, Y. Sato, H. Sugiyama, K. Nanjo and J. Yoshimura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1977, 50, 1788 CrossRef CAS;
(b) J. Das, J. A. Reid, D. R. Kronenthal, J. Singh, P. D. Pansegrau and R. H. Mueller, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 7835 CrossRef CAS;
(c) S. K. Chattopadhyay, J. Kempson, A. McNeil, G. Pattenden, M. Reader, D. E. Rippon and D. Waite, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 2415 RSC;
(d) K. Schuh and F. Glorius, Synthesis, 2007, 15, 2297 Search PubMed (ii) C–I bond: ;
(e) P. M. T. Ferreira, L. S. Monteiro and G. Pereira, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008, 4676 CrossRef CAS;
(f) P. M. T. Ferreira, E. M. S. Castanheira, L. S. Monteiro, G. Pereira and H. Vilaça, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 8672 CrossRef CAS PubMed (iii)
C–S bond: ;
(g) N. C. Misra and H. Ila, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 5195 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
-
(a) C. W. Cheung and S. L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 7526 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) A. E. Wendlandt and S. S. Stahl, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 3866 RSC;
(c) R. Martin, A. Cuenca and S. L. Buchwald, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 5521 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(d) C. Zhang, C. H. Tang and N. Jiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3464 RSC.
-
(a) C. F. Wan, J. T. Zhang, S. J. Wang, J. M. Fan and Z. Y. Wang, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2338 CrossRef CAS PubMed;
(b) J. C. Lee, H. J. Choi and Y. C. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 123 CrossRef CAS.
- The reactions in ref. 14a mainly provided ester substituted oxazoles and there is only one example for acetyl substituted oxazole synthesis. The position of the acetyl group in ref. 14a is ortho to the nitrogen atom which is different with ours.
- During the preparation of this manuscript, Jiang and co-workers reported a similar method for oxazole preparation from amides and ketones using PdCl2/CuBr2 as catalysts and NaHCO3 as the base: M. F. Zheng, L. B. Huang, H. W. Huang, X. W. Li, W. Q. Wu and H. F. Jiang, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5906 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra14394a |
|
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.