Promoting effects of lanthanum on the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 nanotubes for CO oxidation

Ping Zhang, Jiuli Guo, Peng Zhao, Bolin Zhu, Weiping Huang and Shoumin Zhang*
Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Material Chemistry (MOE), Tianjin Key Lab of Metal and Molecule Based Material Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, P. R. China. E-mail: zhangsm@nankai.edu.cn

Received 8th November 2014 , Accepted 13th January 2015

First published on 14th January 2015


Abstract

Lanthanum-modified TiO2 nanotube (NT) supported gold catalysts were prepared. The linear relationship between actual and nominal lanthanum concentrations was found. The possible formation mechanism of La-modified TiO2 NTs was suggested. The effects of calcination temperature, La concentration and gold loading on the catalytic activity for CO oxidation were investigated. Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) calcined at 300 °C could completely convert CO at 30 °C. T100% of La-free catalyst was 60 °C. The catalytic activity of Au/TiO2-NTs could be improved by modification with lanthanum.


Gold has long been disregarded for catalytic purposes because of its inert nature. However, when gold is supported on certain metal oxides in a dispersed state, it shows a surprisingly high activity for several important reactions, including CO oxidation, the water-gas shift, and water pollutant removal.1–3 Extensive literature describes the ability of nanosized gold supported on titania (Au/TiO2) to catalyse the low temperature oxidation of carbon monoxide.4–6 It has been well established the catalytic properties of gold for CO oxidation are not only determined by the particle size but also largely dependent on the nature of the support.

The influence of metal oxides on the catalytic activity has obtained great scientific interest. The surface modification of nanocrystal supports can be a viable route to tailor the activity and stability of the supported catalysis systems. It's believed that different metal oxide modifier may have different redox properties, and may even change the oxidation states of gold and create new active sites.5 The modification strategy has been used to prepare TiO2-based gold catalysts.7–9 Sheng Dai' group loaded various metal oxide additives onto the TiO2 support via excess-solution impregnation of soluble precursors followed by calcination, and established that Au/MxOy/TiO2 all retained significant activity in CO oxidation at ambient temperature even after pretreatment at 500 °C.10,11 Nruparaj Sahu et al. reported that the doping of TiO2 with rare earth could provide additional adsorption/reaction sites for oxygen adsorption and interaction with adsorbed CO, and significantly improved the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 under ambient condition.12 Peter D. Clark et al. studied the performance of Au/TiO2 modified with La2O3, and found that the resulting materials showed very high CO conversion above 323 K and remained active over prolonged periods in the presence of SO2 and other sulfur compounds.13 Jun Yu et al. prepared gold catalyst supported on La or Ce-modified TiO2, and found that modification with ceria or lanthanum oxide improved the synergistic interaction between the support and gold particles, and enhanced the reactivity of the surface oxygen species of the catalyst, resulting in good activity for CO oxidation.14 There have been several reports on the metal-modified to enhance catalytic performance. The majority of reports related to CO oxidation focused on the thermal stability. The effect of the metal ion modification, especially metal ion concentration, on catalytic activity have not been studied in detail.

The shape or morphology of the support has been found to influence the catalytic activity of the resulting gold catalysts. Some studies have been conducted to use TiO2 NTs as support material because of NTs' novel properties, such as unique shape, size confinement in radial-direction and large specific surface area.15,16 Despite several studies on Au/TiO2 NTs for CO oxidation, there are no examples of CO oxidation catalysis on metal oxide-modified Au/TiO2 NTs.

The metal ion modified TiO2 was often used as photocatalyst for degradation of organic compounds, and was emphasized in recent years.17–20 In our previous work, we have prepared La-modified TiO2 nanotubes, and found that the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NTs could be improved by modification with lanthanum ions.21 Hydrothermal treatment was generally applied to prepare TiO2 NTs, However, few reports referred to the study on the controlled synthesis of catalyst with predetermined metal ion concentration.

The aim of the present report was to investigate the situation of La in Au/TiO2 NTs and the effects of lanthanum oxide on the catalytic activity of CO oxidation. La-modified TiO2-NTs supported gold catalysts (denoted as Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs) were prepared by hydrothermal treatment and deposition–precipitation method. The catalysts were characterised by ICP, XRD, TEM, XPS and BET. Their catalytic activities for CO oxidation were evaluated.

Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs were prepared via the combination of sol–gel process with hydrothermal treatment. La2O3–TiO2 powder was prepared by the sol–gel route using tetrabutyl titanate and lanthanum nitrate as the precursors. Under constant stirring, ethanol solution of tetrabutyl titanate was added drop-wise to the mixture of ethanol and lanthanum nitrate solution. The transparent sol was obtained when the mixture was hydrolyzed at room temperature for 6 h under vigorous stirring. The resulting gel was dried at 80 °C for 12 h. After the dried material was calcined in air at 500 °C for 3 h, La2O3–TiO2 powder was obtained. A series of La-modified TiO2 catalysts with different concentrations of La were prepared by changing the amount of lanthanum nitrate added in the ethanol solution. La2O3–TiO2-NTs were synthesized via a simple hydrothermal chemical process. 1.6 g La2O3–TiO2 powder was mixed with 70 mL 10 mol L−1 NaOH aqueous solution in a Teflon vessel and maintained at 150 °C for 12 h. Obtained materials were washed with 0.1 mol L−1 HNO3 solution and distilled water, respectively, and then dried at 80 °C overnight. After the prepared material was calcined at 300 °C for 2 h, La2O3–TiO2-NTs were obtained. La2O3/TiO2 NTs were dispersed in HAuCl4 solution with different concentration. The suspension was adjusted to various pH = 4 with ammonia solution then agitated for 12 h, and refluxed for 6 h. Then the suspension was centrifuged and washed with water to remove Cl ions. After dried at 80 °C overnight, and calcined for 2 h, Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs were obtained. Au/TiO2-NTs without modification was synthesized with the same process except that distilled water instead of lanthanum nitrate solution was used in sol–gel process.

Elemental analysis was performed on an Optima 2000 DV model inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES). The concentrations of La and Au were expressed as wt%. The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments were carried out at room temperature using a Rigaku D/Max-2500 X-ray diffractometer (CuKα λ = 0.154 nm) to identify the crystal phase of the samples. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of were obtained using a JEM-2100 transmission electron microscopy working at 200 kV. The chemical composition and oxidation state on the surface of sample were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using an Al X-ray source (Al Kα-150 W, Kratos Axis Ultra DLD). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas were recorded by JW-K surface area analyzer.

Catalytic tests of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs for CO oxidation were carried out in a fixed-bed flow reactor under atmospheric pressure using 200 mg Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs. A stainless steel tube with an inner diameter of 8 mm was chosen as the reactor tube. The samples were diluted with chemically inert quartz sand. Reaction gas mixture consisting of 10% CO balanced with air was passed through the catalyst bed at a total flow rate of 36.3 mL min−1. The temperature dependence of the sample catalytic activity was recorded in the range of 30–80 °C with a ramping rate of 5 °C min−1. After holding at the reaction temperature for 30 min, effluent gases were analyzed on-line by GC-508A gas chromatography. The activity was expressed by the degree of conversion of CO.

The ICP-OES results shown in Fig. 1a reveal the actual and nominal amount of lanthanum in Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%). The actual lanthanum concentration was lower than the nominal one for all catalysts. According to the preparation procedure, all hydrolysates of tetrabutyl titanate and lanthanum nitrate were completely retained in sol–gel process. This indicated that lanthanum should be lost during hydrothermal treatment. The concentration of lanthanum in TiO2 was found to increase linearly with increasing concentration of La(NO3)3 solutions used during sol–gel process. The average utilization efficiency of lanthanum was 60.25%.


image file: c4ra14133d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Relationships between actual and nominal content of lanthanum (a) and gold (b) in Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs.

ICP was also used to determine the amount of gold present in each of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (La: 1.62%). The relationship between actual and nominal gold content is depicted in Fig. 1b. The actual loading of gold in the catalysts was not a linear function of the nominal value. The samples formed from 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 12.5% gold precursors contained 2.27, 3.7, 4.18, 4.66, and 5.26% gold respectively. This showed that gold loading efficiency decreased (from 91% to 42%) with increasing amount of gold precursors.

Fig. 2 depicts the XRD patterns of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) without calcination and calcined at different temperatures. Diffractions that were attributed to anatase TiO2 were detectable in all samples (JCPDS 21-1272). For the sample without calcination, the peak at 2θ = 25.3° was asymmetric, one shoulder peak at lower 2θ could be identified, which implied that there was a small amount of titanate in the sample. titanate was also confirmed by the very weak peak at 2θ = 9.2° in the sample.23 However, titanate did not present in calcined Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs which indicated that titanate phase could be transformed into anatase phase by calcination treatment. The sharpness of anatase reflection peaks increased with increasing calcination temperature without a change in the overall patterns, which was attributed to improvement of crystallinity and increase of particle size (collapse of TiO2 nanotube) with increasing calcination temperature. For all samples, peaks at 2θ = 44°, 64° and 77° were designated to the 200, 220 and 311 plane of gold (JCPDS 4-0784), respectively, which proved that TiO2 nanotubes were modified by gold particles. The 111 diffraction peak of gold was at 2θ = 38°, which might be overlaid by the 103 diffraction peak of anatase TiO2. No independent phase originating from La2O3 or La2Ti2O7 was detected. It indicated that the lanthanum ions were highly dispersed on TiO2, and XRD was not sensitive enough to detect such minor changes to TiO2. The average gold nanoparticle sizes were estimated from X-ray line broadening analysis applying the Debye–Scherrer equation on the 111 diffraction of gold (2θ = 44°). The sizes of gold of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs without calcination, calcined at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C were 2.1, 3.1, 3.4, 3.6, and 6.9 nm, respectively. Obviously, the gold nanoparticle sizes increased with increasing calcination temperatures. The gold size increased only slightly with increasing calcination temperature from 200 to 400 °C, which indicated that lanthanum oxide could depress the movement and growth of gold nanoparticles.11,14 The stabilizing effect appears also to be dependent on the nature support. When the sample was calcined at 500 °C, accompanying with the break of nanotubes, gold nanoparticles dramatically grew.


image file: c4ra14133d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) without calcination and calcined at different temperatures for 2 h.

The possible formation mechanism of La-modified TiO2 NTs could be described as follows: in sol–gel process, La3+ were homogeneously dispersed in TiO2 sol and gel. After heating treatment, TiO2 amorphous phase was transformed into anatase. The ionic radius of La3+ (0.115 nm) is bigger than that of Ti4+ (0.068 nm). Therefore, it is difficult for La3+ to really enter the lattice of TiO2. La3+ ions were most likely to be found as dispersed metal oxides within the crystal matrix or on the surface of TiO2.13,19,22 The amount of La2O3 within TiO2 matrix should be proportional to total amount of lanthanum. The structure of anatase TiO2 can be described in terms of chains of distorted TiO6 octahedra. Each Ti4+ is surrounded by an octahedron of six O2− ions. Two Ti–O bonds are longer, while the other four are shorter. In hydrothermal treatment, reacting with concentrated NaOH, the longer Ti–O bonds will be attacked by OH ions and break, but the shorter ones will not, thus to form larger planar nanosheets with (Ti–O)n netlike structure.24,25 La2O3 within TiO2 matrix was embedded in nanosheets, whereas La2O3 on the surface of TiO2 was not. When the fragments grew up into an adequate size, tubulating process took place. With the exfoliating, curling and scrolling of nanosheets, lanthanum modified TiO2 NTs were formed.

The TEM image of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs is shown in Fig. 3. For samples without calcination (Fig. 3a) and calcined at 300 °C (Fig. 3b), nanotubular structures were clearly observed. The nanotubes were open-ended, and their length was more than hundreds of nanometers. The nanotube had inner and outer diameters of about 8 nm and 10 nm, respectively. For the sample without calcination, gold nanoparticles were distributed homogeneously on the TiO2 NTs, showing no preference of anchoring sites. The size of monodisperse spherical gold nanoparticle was about 2 nm, which was in agreement with XRD data. At higher magnification (Fig. 3c), a detail examination of the nanotubes revealed that gold nanoparticles were both encapsulated in and deposited on the nanotubes. The La2O3–TiO2 nanotubes were dispersed in HAuCl4 solution during deposition–precipitation process. The nanotubes were open-ended and their inner diameter was about 8 nm, enabling some gold ion species to enter their tube cavities. Further heating treatment induced growth of gold particles within the tubes, which was responsible for the result of Fig. 3c. Fig.3d shows the TEM image of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs calcined at 500 °C for 2 h. It could be observed the nanotubes broke. It could be also seen that accompanying with the break of nanotubes, gold particles obviously grew. It was also confirmed by XRD data. The gold nanoparticle size given by XRD had a dramatic increase when the sample was calcined at 500 °C.


image file: c4ra14133d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 TEM images of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) without calcination (a) calcined at 300 °C (b and c) and 500 °C (d).

Fig. 4 shows the XPS spectra of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) calcined at 300 °C for 2 h. There were O, Ti, Au, La and C on the surface. The residual carbon resulted from the organic precursors used in the sol–gel method. The adventitious hydrocarbon from XPS itself might also cause the presence of C. The concentration of lanthanum analyzed by XPS was 1.81 wt%. The surface lanthanum concentration was slightly higher than actual concentration (1.62 wt%) determined by ICP, which could be attributed to the surface enrichment of La2O3 in Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs due to calcination. The atomic ratio of O to Ti analyzed by XPS was ca. 2.76. Li et al. reported 2.17 and 2.70 of the atomic ratio of O to Ti for 0.7 and 1.2 wt% La3+–TiO2 powders.19 X. J Quan et al. also found that the atomic ratio of O to Ti was ca. 2.49 for the 1.0 wt% La3+–TiO2.20 In our previous work, O/Ti surface ratios was measured to be ca. 2.31 for the 0.75 wt% La/TiO2 NTs.21 The O/Ti surface ratio obtained in this work agreed well with that reported previously because it was found that the ratio of [O]/[Ti] on the surface of TiO2 increased with the increase of lanthanum concentration. The concentration of gold analyzed by XPS was 2.82 wt%. The surface gold content was much lower than actual content of gold (4.18 wt%) determined by ICP, which implied that some gold nanoparticles encapsulated in the tube cavities. It was also confirmed by TEM observations.


image file: c4ra14133d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 XPS spectra of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) calcined at 300 °C for 2 h: (a) O 1s peaks; (b) Ti 2p peaks; (c) Au 4f peaks; (d) La 3d peaks.

Fig. 4a shows the O 1s XPS spectra of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs. The O 1s peak was asymmetric, besides the main peak of O1s located at about 529.3 eV corresponding to lattice oxygen of TiO2, two shoulder peaks at higher and lower binding energy could be identified. The peak at 530.8 eV should be attributed to the surface species such as Ti–OH and Ti–O–O–. Generally, narrow scan O1s XPS spectrum requires only two peaks to fit the curve.26 In this, the small shoulder peak at 527.6 eV was attributed to La–O.13,27 Fig. 4b shows the high resolution XPS spectra of Ti 2p. The Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2 spin–orbital splitting photoelectrons were located at binding energies of 464.9 and 459.3 eV respectively, which was in accord with the reported literature values, showing the presence of Ti4+.23 Fig. 4d shows the high solution XPS spectra of the La 3d region of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs. The signals of La were very weak, due to the low lanthanum concentration. It could be observed that both the spin–orbit split 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 levels showed double-peak structures. The spin–orbit splitting between the 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 levels was 17.1 eV, and the separation between the satellite and main peak was 4.5 eV, which agreed with reported values for La3+ compounds.28,29 The presence of La3+ in the catalysts was also revealed by the small peak at 527.6 eV (O linked to La).13,27 Fig. 4c shows the Au 4f XPS spectra of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs. The Au 4f7/2 peak was located at binding energy of 84.2 eV. The binding energy was characteristic for zero valent gold and closed to the ones observed for bulk metallic gold (84.0 eV).30 No peaks corresponding to oxidized gold species, which would be located around 85.5 and 86.3 eV, have been detected.

The BET surface areas of La-free Au/TiO2-NTs and 1.62% La-modified Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (calcined at 300 °C for 2 h, Au: 4.18%) were 166.3 and 192.7 m2 g−1, respectively, which indicated that the modification with lanthanum resulted in an enhanced surface area surface area of the TiO2 support. This is consistent with the results of previous studies.12,14,31 Compared with La-free TiO2-NTs, Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs had larger adsorption capacity for oxygen because of their larger surface area. The spillover process of adsorbed oxygen could took place easily and efficiently. The higher surface area of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs might play a role for their higher catalytic activity than La-free TiO2-NTs.

Calcination temperature significantly affects the activity of catalyst. The higher the calcination temperature, the stronger interaction exists between gold particles and support. Catalytic property of titania-supported gold catalyst is associated with the strong metal–support interaction. CO oxidation activities of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) calcined at different temperatures were shown in Fig. 5a. The results showed that CO conversion increased with increasing calcinations temperature; however, when calcination temperature was increased from 300 °C to 400 °C, the CO conversion slightly decreased. The sample calcined at 300 °C possessed the best catalytic activity, and it could convert CO to CO2 completely at 30 °C. It is worth to point out that some gold catalysts described in literature achieved complete CO conversions at or below room temperature, but it has to be taken into account that most studies in literature used 1% CO or less (while we used 10% of this gas). The activity of the catalyst calcined had significantly lessened with complete conversion of CO at the temperature of 70 °C, and only 52% of CO was converted at 30 °C. The main reason might be that TiO2 nanotubes collapsed during the high-temperature treatment, resulting in increased mobility and growth of gold nanoparticles, as seen in the TEM images, which correspondingly led to the loss of catalytic activity. It could be concluded that the appropriate calcination temperature was 300 °C.


image file: c4ra14133d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Catalytic activities of Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs calcined at different temperatures (a); with different Au loadings (b) and La concentration (c).

Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs were prepared with different gold loadings of 1.86%∼5.26% (La: 1.62%). All catalysts were calcined at 300 °C for 2 hours. Fig. 5b shows the catalytic activities of samples as a function of gold loading. The CO conversion increased with increasing gold content from 1.86% to 4.18%, and while gold loading was increased from 4.18% to 5.26% the CO conversion decreased. The 4.18% gold-loading catalyst exhibited the highest activity among the catalysts studied. In order to investigate the influence of lanthanum on the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 NTs, the catalytic activities of samples with different La contents (Au: 4.18%) were evaluated for CO oxidation. As seen in Fig. 5c, the sample with 1.62% lanthanum had the best catalytic activity. At 30 °C, CO could be completely converted to CO2 for 1.62% La-modified catalyst, while only 9.1% of CO was converted for La-free sample. T100% of catalyst without La-modification was 60 °C.

The results revealed that the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2-NTs could be improved by modification with lanthanum ions. According to the in situ FTIR study reported previously, the presence of La3+ could promote the reactivity of CO adsorbed on the Ti4+ site, and gave rise to certain new O2 adsorption sites at Au/TiO2 interfaces for the adsorption and activation of O2 molecules, which was attributed to the increase in the content of surface oxygen vacancies and defects after lanthanum modification.12,13 Thus, lanthanum could improve the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2-NTs for CO oxidation.

In summary, La-modified TiO2-NTs supported gold catalysts were prepared by hydrothermal treatment and deposition–precipitation method. The actual concentration of lanthanum was found to increase linearly with increasing nominal concentration, while the actual gold loadings were not a linear function of the nominal loading. The gold loading efficiency decreased with increasing amount of gold precursor. The possible formation mechanism of La-modified TiO2 NTs was proposed. The nanotubes were open-ended, and their length was more than hundreds of nanometers. The size of monodisperse spherical gold particle was about 2 nm. Gold nanoparticles were both encapsulated in and deposited on the TiO2 nanotubes. Au/La2O3–TiO2-NTs (Au: 4.18%, La: 1.62%) calcined at 300 °C possessed the best catalytic activity, and it could convert CO to CO2 completely at 30 °C, while only 9.1% of CO was converted for La-free sample at 30 °C. T100% of catalyst without lanthanum modification was 60 °C. The catalytic activity of Au/TiO2-NTs could be improved by modification of lanthanum ions.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21271110, 21373120 and 21301098), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Tianjin (12JCYBJC13100 and 13JCQNJC02000) and MOE Innovation Team (IRT13022) of China.

Notes and references

  1. A. Corma and H. Garcia, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2096–2126 RSC.
  2. A. Ayati, A. Ahmadpour, F. F. Bamoharram, B. Tanhaei, M. Mänttäri and M. Sillanpää, Chemosphere, 2014, 107, 163–174 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. I. S. Grover, S. Singh and B. Pal, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 51342–51348 RSC.
  4. M. M. Schubert, S. Hackenberg, A. C. van Veen, M. Muhler, V. Plzak and R. J. Behm, J. Catal., 2001, 197, 113–122 CrossRef CAS.
  5. Z. Ma and S. Dai, Nano Res., 2011, 4(1), 3–32 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. F. Romero-Sarria, J. J. Plata, O. H. Laguna, A. M. Marquez, M. A. Centeno, J. F. Sanz and J. A. Odriozola, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 13145–13152 RSC.
  7. S. Yu, H. J. Yun, D. M. Lee and J. Yi, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 12629–12635 RSC.
  8. Y.-W. Chen, D.-S. Lee and H.-J. Chen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(20), 15140–15155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. S. N. Li, H. Q. Zhu and Z. F. Qin, et al., Appl. Catal., B, 2014, 144, 498–506 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. W. F. Yan, S. M. Mahurin, Z. W. Pan, S. H. Overbury and S. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10480–10481 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. Z. Ma, S. H. Overbury and S. Dai, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2007, 273, 186–197 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. N. Sahu, K. M. Parida, A. K. Tripathi and V. S. Kamble, Appl. Catal., A, 2011, 399, 110–116 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. P. D. Clarka, R. Sui, N. I. Dowling, M. Huang and J. M. H. Lo, Catal. Today, 2013, 207, 212–219 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. J. Yu, G. S. Wu, G. Z. Lu, D. S. Mao and Y. Guo, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 16985–16991 RSC.
  15. P. Roy, S. Berger and P. Schmuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2904–2939 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. V. Galstyan, E. Comini, G. Faglia and G. Sberveglieri, Sensors, 2013, 13, 14813–14838 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. A. Ajmal, I. Majeed, R. N. Malik, H. Idriss and M. A. Nadeem, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 37003–37026 RSC.
  18. N. Liu, X. Y. Chen, J. L. Zhang and J. W. Schwank, Catal. Today, 2014, 225, 34–51 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. F. B. Li, X. Z. Li and M. F. Hou, Appl. Catal., B, 2004, 48, 185–194 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. X. J. Quan, H. Q. Tan, Q. H. Zhao and X. M. Sang, J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42, 6287–6296 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. H. H. Wu, L. X. Deng, S. R. Wang, B. L. Zhu, W. P. Huang, S. H. Wu and S. M. Zhang, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 2010, 31(10), 1311–1316 CrossRef CAS.
  22. Q. Q. Wang, S. H. Xu and F. L. Shen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, 7671–7677 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. M. Zhang, Z. Jin, J. Zhang, X. Guo, J. Yang, W. Li, X. Wang and Z. Zhang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2004, 217, 203–210 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. W. P. Chen, X. Y. Guo, S. L. Zhang and Z. S. Jin, J. Nanopart. Res., 2007, 9, 1173–1180 CrossRef CAS.
  25. B. D. Yao, Y. F. Chan, X. Y. Zhang, W. F. Zhang, Z. Y. Yang and N. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2003, 82, 281–283 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. K. Nagaveni, M. S. Hegde, N. Ravishankar, G. N. Subbanna and G. Madras, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 2900–2907 CrossRef CAS.
  27. D. A. Pawlak, M. Ito, M. Oku, K. Shimamura and T. Fukuda, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 504–507 CrossRef CAS.
  28. A. M. Ruiz, A. Cornet and J. R. Morante, Sens. Actuators, B, 2005, 111–112, 7–12 CAS.
  29. S. Majumdar, K. Kooser, T. Elovaara, H. Huhtinen, S. Granroth and P. Paturi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2013, 25, 376003 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. J. Llorca, A. Casanovas, M. Domínhuez, I. Casanova, I. Angurell, M. Seco and O. Rossell, J. Nanopart. Res., 2008, 10, 537–542 CrossRef CAS.
  31. M. Grujić-Brojčin, S. Armaković, N. Tomić, B. Abramović, A. Golubović, B. Stojadinović, A. Kremenović, B. Babić, Z. Dohčević-Mitrović and M. Šćepanović, Mater. Charact., 2014, 88, 30–41 CrossRef PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.