Ze-Min Jua,
Hai-Lang Jiaa,
Xue-Hai Jub,
Xing-Fu Zhouc,
Zhi-Qiang Shia,
He-Gen Zheng*a and
Ming-Dao Zhang*ad
aState Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, P. R. China. E-mail: zhenghg@nju.edu.cn; Fax: +86-25-83314502
bSchool of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, P. R. China. E-mail: xhju@mail.njust.edu.cn
cState Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China. E-mail: zhouxf@njut.edu.cn
dJiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, P. R. China. E-mail: matchlessjimmy@163.com
First published on 4th December 2014
This paper focuses on the structure modification of triphenylamine dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Three D–D–π–A dyes (TTR1–3), with triphenylamine moiety and its derivatives as the electron donor, thiophene ring as the π-bridge, and 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)rhodanine (DCRD) as the electron acceptor, were synthesized and fully characterized. Nanocrystalline TiO2-based DSSCs were fabricated using these dyes to investigate the effect of different donor groups introduced into triphenylamine on their photovoltaic performances. The overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of DSSCs based on TTR1–3 with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) coadsorbant are 5.20%, 5.71% and 6.30%, respectively, compared to 6.62% achieved with N719. Introduced heterocyclic group with alkyl lain into triphenylamine decreased dye absorbed amount but significantly improved the value of the open circuit voltage (Voc) and the short-circuit photocurrent (Jsc), which result from the fact that they can effectively suppress the charge recombination and prevent aggregation between adjacent molecules on TiO2. We also researched the effect of sensitization for single dyes on their photovoltaic performances. The PCEs of DSSCs soaked for 32 h increase slightly compared to those of DSSCs soaked for 16 h, which result from the adsorption quantity on the TiO2 surface. We found that, with soaking twice in 32 h, the Jsc and Voc were both obviously improved compared with soaking once in 32 h. These results provide a new approach for enhancing the photovoltaic performances of DSSCs based on single dye.
Optimization of DSSCs efficiency can be addressed in a variety of ways, such as designing different sensitizers with different chemical structures,3,4 and exploiting different electrolytes including ionic liquids and solid state hole conducting materials.5,6 For many years, ruthenium based complexes were the “champion” dyes of DSSCs and some of them were distinguished by achieving more than 11% efficiency.7 However, ruthenium cannot be considered “earth abundant materials” and, thus, it is desirable to look for alternative dyes. In order to get high conversion efficiency and low cost DSSCs, much effort has been dedicated to designing and synthesizing dyes such as zinc porphyrin. After appropriate tailoring of the chemical structure and employment of a cobalt electrolyte, the porphyrin dye YD2-o-C8 with Y123 coadsorbant showed PCE of up to 12.3% under standard conditions (AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2 intensity)8 which was further improved to 13% utilizing SM315.9 However, porphyrins usually require complicated synthetic strategies with relatively low yields, especially when an anchoring function and a redox group have to be introduced at specific positions. Metal-free organic dyes as sensitizers in DSSCs have drawn widespread academic and commercial attention because of their high molar extinction coefficient and easily adjustable spectral response. Recently, a number of novel metal-free organic sensitizers, such as triphenylamine,10 indoline,11 perylene,12 carbazole,13 tetrahydroquinoline,14 phenothiazine15 and fluorene dyes,16 have been investigated and applied in DSSCs successfully.
In this paper, three novel triphenylamine sensitizers TTR1–3 have been designed and synthesized. As donors, triphenylamine and its derivatives10,17–21 have shown promise in the development of DSSCs, owing to: (1) three benzene rings of triphenylamine have high activity, so the different functional groups are easy to be introduced. (2) Three non-coplanar phenyl having propeller structure which results in large steric hindrance can effectively prevent aggregation between adjacent molecules on TiO2 surface. (3) Triphenylamine which possess high molar extinction coefficient and strong electron donating ability is prone to electron delocalization. Compared with alkyloxy chain, heterocyclic group, such as thienyl, 3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazolyl and 5-hexylthiophen-2-yl which are introduced into triphenylamine in this paper can bring wide absorption spectra and prevent the dye aggregation on TiO2 surface. 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)rhodanine (DCRD) is chosen as electron acceptor, which can not only bring wide absorption spectra, but also maintain excellent electron injection efficiency owing to its special characteristics. What's more, the O and N on the rhodanine unit can both form strong chelating bonds with Ti cations, furnishing enhanced stability of the dyes in comparison with COOH anchor.22–24 To our knowledge, this is one of few reports of dyes with DCRD as electron acceptor showing higher efficiency. The molecular structures of TTR1–3 which possess the structure of donor–donor–π-bridge–accepter (D–D–π–A) are shown in Scheme 1, where the π-bridge is the thiophene.
These three dyes were used to manufacture dye-sensitized solar cells with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) coadsorbant. The differences of the photovoltaic performances based on these dyes have been analyzed by UV-vis absorption, cyclic voltammogram, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). We showed that by incorporating two heterocyclic groups with large steric hindrance into the triphenylamine-based dyes, the efficiency can be improved obviously. Compared to 6.62% achieved with N719, the overall PCE of the DSSCs based on TTR1–3 dyes are 5.20%, 5.71% and 6.30%, respectively. We also studied the effect of sensitization way on the performance of DSSCs. The improvement of PCE is realized through re-sensitization, which provides a new method to improve the PCE for single dye.
The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of the DSSCs was measured by a DC method. The light source was a 300 W xenon lamp (Oriel 6258) coupled with a flux controller to improve the stability of the irradiance. The light passed through a monochromator (Cornerstone 260 Oriel 74125) to select a single wavelength with a resolution of 10 nm. The monochromatic light beam was then focused on the active region of the device. Light intensity was measured by a NREL traceable Si detector (Oriel 71030NS) and the short circuit currents of the DSSCs were measured by an optical power meter (Oriel 70310).
Quasi-reversible oxidation and reduction waves were recorded using a Chenhua CHI660D model Electrochemical Workstation (Shanghai), while Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy was carried out using a Chenhua CHI660I model Electrochemical Workstation (Shanghai).
To estimate the adsorbed amounts of dye on the TiO2 film, the sensitized 6 × 6 mm electrodes were separately immersed into a 0.1 M NaOH solution in a mixed solvent (water:
N,N-dimethylformamide = 1
:
1), which resulted in the desorption of each dye. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured with a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrometer.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 (a) Electronic absorption of TTR1, TTR2, and TTR3 dissolved in dichloromethane. (b) Electronic absorption of TTR1, TTR2, and TTR3 absorbed on TiO2 thin film. |
Dye | λmaxa [nm] (ε, 104 L mol−1 cm−1) | λmaxb [nm] | Eoxc [V] (vs. NH) | E0–0d [eV] | E*oxe [V] (vs. NH) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Absorption maximum in dichloromethane solution (3 × 10−5 M).b Absorption maximum on 8 μm TiO2 transparent films.c The ground-state oxidation potentials of dyes were measured in a dichloromethane with 0.1 M tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) as electrolyte (Pt working electrode, SCE reference electrode calibrated with Ag/Ag+ as an external reference, Pt counter-electrode).d E0–0 was estimated from the absorption thresholds from UV-vis absorption spectra of the dyes.e E*ox was calculated as Eox − E0–0. | |||||
TTR1 | 535 (2.82) | 475 | 0.75 | 1.85 | −1.10 |
TTR2 | 521 (3.09) | 492 | 0.72 | 1.80 | −1.08 |
TTR3 | 526 (2.71) | 460 | 0.73 | 1.72 | −0.99 |
All of the bands of TTR1–3 are broadened significantly in comparison with the reference triphenylamine dye RD-II,24 the absorption spectra of TTR3 extends to 730 nm. The maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) for TTR1–3 are 535, 521 and 526 nm in the range 450–560 nm, respectively, which are about 10 nm red-shifted than that of the RD-II which contains octyloxy units on the periphery of the triphenylamine. The increase in red-shift of the absorption band is possibly due to the electronic effect of the heterocyclic groups which can prolong the π-conjugation's length and amount of dyes molecules. This result confirms that the heterocyclic groups appended on triphenylamine have positive effect on improving the UV-vis absorption of the triphenylamine dyes.
Fig. 1b shows the absorption spectra of the three dyes adsorbed on a transparent TiO2 film. Compared with the spectra in dichloromethane solution, a blue-shift and broadening of the absorption peak was observed in all the dyes on TiO2 surface, which can be attributed to the formation of deprotonation and H-aggregate.32 Such spectral broadening allows the dye molecules to harvest visible light more efficiently. As shown in Fig. 1b, when the dyes were adsorbed on TiO2 surface, TTR2 has a larger absorbance value than TTR1 and TTR3 in the range 430–570 nm, which is similar to the spectra in dichloromethane solution.
Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is used to analyze the excitation pathways and understand the injection process under different portions of sunlight irradiation.34 Taking TTR3 for example, the observed two bands in absorption spectra are caused by several kinds of electron excitation. The low-energy band located at 526 nm is ascribed to HOMO → LUMO transition and the UV band around 375 nm is composed of HOMO → LUMO + 1 and HOMO − 1 → LUMO. Obviously, most transitions move excited electrons to LUMO and LUMO + 1 orbitals; hence, checking the electron distribution of these orbits is pivotal for evaluating electron injection in view of orbital overlap between sensitizer and TiO2. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation on TTR3 indicates that the electrons of both LUMO and LUMO + 1 are delocalized over the π–A moiety with a large composition on the anchoring group (Fig. 2), where the electron is close to the TiO2 surface and can be smoothly injected into the CB of the TiO2 semiconductor. The phenomenon of TTR3 is similar to those of TTR1 and TTR2 (Fig. S1 and S2†). Therefore, photons from each of the two absorption bands are useful for electron injection and photovoltaic conversion.
As shown in Fig. 3, the TTR1 and TTR3 exhibit similar profile because of their similar structures, while there is a new oxidation peak for TTR2, which may results from the oxidation of carbazole fragment. Zero–zero excitation energy (E0–0) estimated from the absorption onset35 and the ground-state oxidation potential (Eox) were used to calculate the excited-state oxidation potential (E*ox = Eox − E0–0). On the one hand, the deduced E*ox values of TTR1–3 which are similar to the experimental data (Fig. S6†) are more negative than the conduction band edge of the TiO2 (−0.5 V vs. NHE),35 indicating that the electron injection process should be energetically favorable. On the other hand, the Eox (Table 1) of these three dyes are more positive than the redox potential of the I−/I3− couple (0.4 V vs. NHE),32 suggesting that the oxidized dyes should be able to accept electrons from I− thermodynamically for effective dye regeneration. Consequently, all dyes have enough thermodynamic driving forces for efficient DSSCs using nanocrystalline TiO2 photoanode and I−/I3− electrolyte.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 (a) Photocurrent density–voltage curves for the DSSCs based on TTR1–3 under irradiation of AM 1.5 G full sunlight. (b) IPCE of DSSCs based on TTR1–3. |
Dye | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | F.F.% | η% |
---|---|---|---|---|
a The photocurrent–voltage characteristics were measured with coadsorbent (10 M CDCA) for 13 μm thick TiO2 film with liquid electrolyte (0.05 M I2, 0.1 M LiI, 0.1 M DMPII, and 0.5 M TBP) at full sunlight (AM 1.5 G 100 MW cm−2). | ||||
TTR1 | 0.717 | 10.352 | 70 | 5.196 |
TTR2 | 0.762 | 10.978 | 68 | 5.714 |
TTR3 | 0.771 | 12.204 | 67 | 6.304 |
N719 | 0.754 | 12.909 | 68 | 6.619 |
As depicted in Fig. 4a, the values of the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of TTR2 and TTR3 are superior to TTR1, which may be attributed to reduced charge recombination between injected electrons and electron acceptors (I3−) in the electrolytes. Introduced large functional groups into triphenylamine can effectively prevented I3− from approaching the TiO2 surface. The values of short-circuit current (Jsc) for the three dyes are in the order of TTR1 < TTR2 < TTR3 and, specifically, the corresponding PCE (η) values are 5.20%, 5.71%, and 6.30%, respectively, and the value of TTR3 is closed to that of N719. The improvement of PCE from TTR1 to TTR3 is mainly assigned to the increase in the Jsc, which is partly due to different steric hindrance for three dyes. Compared with TTR1, TTR2 and TTR3 are provided with large steric hindrance, thus, they can effectively prevent aggregation between adjacent molecules on TiO2 and suppress the charge recombination between the dye cation and the semiconducting oxide electrode. The absorption spectrum can also explain why the values of Jsc are different. As shown Fig. 1a, compared with TTR2, TTR3 possesses a broader absorption band which indicates the superior ability of light harvesting at longer wavelength regions, so the Jsc value of TTR3 is larger than that of TTR2. The smallest Jsc value of TTR1 is mainly because of its weaker and narrower UV-vis absorption. So, the above results directly demonstrate that the photovoltaic performances of triphenylamine dye can be improved after introducing heterocycle moiety which leads the π-conjugation's length and amount to enlarge.
The IPCE spectra of the DSSCs employing TTR1, TTR2 and TTR3 are shown in Fig. 4b. IPCE curves of three triphenylamine dyes have similar profiles. IPCE values of TTR3 exceed 60% from 420 to 560 nm, with a maximum value (79.0%) at 480 nm leading to the highest Jsc. The higher IPCE value of the DSSC based on TTR2 in the range of 420–475 nm is probably due to a lower energy gap between the LUMO (Fig. S2 in the ESI†) level of TTR2 and the conduction band edge of TiO2, which leads to an increased electron injection efficiency compared with TTR1 and TTR3. This also may due to the existence of carbazole donor group, while TTR1 and TTR3 possess the thiophene donor group. Among all the dyes, IPCE value of TTR1 is lower than those of TTR2 and TTR3, and spectral response of TTR1 is also inferior to other dyes. Thus, TTR1 gives rise to a lower light harvesting efficiency, resulting in the smallest Jsc.
As shown in Fig. 5a, under simulated AM 1.5 solar light, the radius of the larger semicircle increases in the order of TTR1 < TTR2 < TTR3, indicating that the electron recombination resistance increases in the same order. This result is in agreement with the observed shift in the Voc values. Compared with the DSSCs with CDCA coadsorbant, the TTR1–3 based DSSCs show smaller semicircle in absence of CDCA (Fig. S7†), which is corresponding to the decrease of the Voc values as shown in Tables 1 and 3. As shown in Fig. S2,† evidently, the charge transfer resistance in the high-frequency region increases from TTR1 to TTR2 (TTR3), which is consistent with the higher Voc value of TTR2 (TTR3) compared with that of TTR1. Therefore, the higher charge recombination rate may partly results in the existence of the wide gap (50 mV) between the open-circuit voltages of TTR2 (TTR3) and TTR1.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 EIS Nyquist (a) and Bode (b) plots for TTR1–3 based DSSCs with CDCA coadsorbant measured under illumination of 100 mW cm−2 simulated AM 1.5 solar light. |
TTR1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Soaking time | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | F.F.% | η% |
a The photocurrent–voltage characteristics were measured under soaking 16 h, 32 h and 16 + 16 h corresponding to the [a], [b] and [c]. | ||||
16 h[a] | 0.608 | 6.895 | 72 | 3.000 |
32 h[b] | 0.603 | 7.485 | 71 | 3.261 |
16 + 16 h[c] | 0.625 | 0.781 | 71 | 3.453 |
TTR2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Soaking time | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | F.F.% | η% |
16 h[a] | 0.709 | 8.487 | 69 | 4.151 |
32 h[b] | 0.707 | 8.812 | 69 | 4.326 |
16 + 16 h[c] | 0.726 | 9.411 | 71 | 4.850 |
TTR3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Soaking time | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | F.F.% | η% |
16 h[a] | 0.694 | 8.581 | 71 | 4.216 |
32 h[b] | 0.695 | 9.107 | 70 | 4.442 |
16 + 16 h[c] | 0.713 | 9.736 | 70 | 4.856 |
Fig. 5b shows the Bode plots of the DSSCs based on TTR1–3. All EIS Bode plots exhibit two-peak features for the frequency investigated. The peak at lower frequency corresponds to the charge transfer at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, which is related to the charge recombination rate and whose reciprocal is associated with the electron lifetime.42 In Fig. 5b, the low frequency peak of TTR3 shows a lower frequency than those of TTR1 and TTR2, indicating that TTR3-based DSSC has longer electron lifetimes, which leads to a lower rate of charge recombination. The electron lifetime values is in the order of TTR1 < TTR2 < TTR3, likewise supporting the observed shift in the Voc value.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 Photocurrent density–voltage curves for the DSSCs based on TTR1–3 corresponding to (a)–(c) under different soaking time. |
As shown in Fig. 6, the Jsc of TTR1–3 soaked for 16 + 16 h improves significantly compared with that of soaked for 16 and 32 h, which results from the fact that increasing the adsorption quantity (Table S2†) enhances light harvesting ability. At the same soaking time, the Voc of the DSSCs soaked twice in 32 h (16 + 16 h) are also superior to that soaked once in 32 h. We speculate that there are two adsorption types on the TiO2 surface, namely, physical adsorption and chemical adsorption. For the former, after the first 16 h soaking (Fig. 7a), photoanode was rinsed with dichloromethane and dye molecules that were physical adsorbed were washed away, which resulted in vacancy on the TiO2 surface, thus oxidation species in electrolyte, especially for I3− which possesses small size, was easy to approach photoanode and leading to the decrease in Voc (Fig. 7a). As is shown in Fig. 7b, the second 16 h bathing can not only prevent oxidation species from approaching photoanode, but also increase the adsorption quantity of dye molecules (Table S2†), which gives rise to large Voc and Jsc. The improvement of PCE is realized through re-sensitization, which provides a new sensitization method to improve the performance of DSSCs.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 (a) Schematic diagram of dealing for the first 16 h bathing. (b) Schematic diagram of dealing with following 16 h re-sensitization. |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details of the EIS experiments and adsorption amount, cyclic voltammogram, synthesis of TTR1–3, FTIR spectrum of TTR1–3 power and absorbed on TiO2, EIS Nyquist for single dye and density functional calculations of TTR1 and TTR2 are reported in the ESI. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra13782e |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |