Miguel Muñoz
Rojo
a,
Jaime
Martín
a,
Stéphane
Grauby
b,
Theodorian
Borca-Tasciuc
c,
Stefan
Dilhaire
b and
Marisol
Martin-Gonzalez
*a
aInstituto de Microelectrónica de Madrid, Calle de Isaac Newton, 8 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain. E-mail: marisol@imm.cnm.csic.es
bUniv. Bordeaux, LOMA, UMR 5798, 33405 Talence, France
cRensselaer Polytechnique Institute, 110 8th St, Troy, NY 12180, USA
First published on 10th February 2015
Correction for ‘Decrease in thermal conductivity in polymeric P3HT nanowires by size-reduction induced by crystal orientation: new approaches towards thermal transport engineering of organic materials’ by Miguel Muñoz Rojo et al., Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 7858–7865.
(a) The composite thermal conductivity of the 220 nm diameter composite should be quoted as 1.21 W K−1 m−1 instead of 1.18 W K−1 m−1 in Table 1 on page 7860 and in line 3 of the text on page 7862.
(b) In the last paragraph of text at the end of page 7862 and in the caption for Fig. 2b on page 7863, the written diameter should be quoted as 220 nm instead of 250 nm.
(c) In the text and caption for Fig. S5 on page 6 of the supplementary information, the written diameter should be quoted as 350 nm instead of 300 nm.
(d) Fig. 3 in the manuscript does not represent the thermal conductivities given in Table 1 because of graphical data misplacement of the 220 nm and 350 nm diameter results. The new Fig. 3 shows the correct thermal conductivity values of 0.7 W Km−1 (instead of 0.58 W Km−1) for 220 nm and 2.29 W Km−1 (instead of 2.2 W Km−1) for 350 nm. It also includes error bars for the measured thermal conductivities. Fig. 3 should appear as follows:
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |