Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Hybrid wood materials with improved fire retardance by bio-inspired mineralisation on the nano- and submicron level

Vivian Merk ab, Munish Chanana *ac, Tobias Keplinger ab, Sabyasachi Gaan d and Ingo Burgert *ab
aWood Materials Science, Institute for Building Materials (IfB), ETH Zürich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 3, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: munish.chanana@uni-bayreuth.de; iburgert@ethz.ch
bApplied Wood Materials Laboratory, EMPA – Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
cPhysical Chemistry II, University of Bayreuth, University of Bayreuth, Universitätstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany
dAdvanced Fibres, EMPA – Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland

Received 25th September 2014 , Accepted 19th December 2014

First published on 13th January 2015


Inspired by natural matrix-mediated biomineralisation, we present an artificial calcification approach for wood, which predominately targets the hardly accessible nanoporous cell wall structure rather than the micron-sized void system of the cell lumina. CaCO3 can be deposited with this method deep inside the wood structure. Mineralisation of the wood cell wall architecture with CaCO3 offers a green alternative to conventional fire-retardant systems.


The hierarchical structure of plants provides a utilisable nano- and microstructural skeleton at the cell and cell wall level to develop advanced biocomposites with novel material properties. The wood cell wall consists of stiff paracrystalline cellulose nanofibrils which are oriented in a parallel fashion and are embedded in the amorphous matrix components such as hemicelluloses and lignins.1,2 This sustainable biocomposite, well known for its excellent mechanical performance,2 has great potential for wider utilisation, given that a better control of functionalisation processes of the intrinsic hierarchical wood structure is achieved. Although being strong and rigid, the cell wall can be regarded as a compact skeleton since it possesses small nanopores between the cellulose fibrils.

In particular, a hybrid material which consolidates the stiff secondary cell wall of wood with a mineral phase at the nanostructural level can result in a highly desirable material combination.3–5 A particularly promising but also challenging candidate that could be united with the wood cell wall skeleton to form an advanced and eco-friendly hybrid material for large-scale applications is calcium carbonate (CaCO3).

The insertion of CaCO3 into the wood scaffold is inspired by nature's invention to increase the durability and hardness and reduce the water uptake of the exoskeleton of various species. Screening CaCO3 incidence in nature, it can be noted that it is the most abundant biomineral in corals, pearls, mollusk shells, egg shells and crustacean skeletons,3–5 whereas calcification occurs rarely in plant cell walls.6 Generally, plants mineralise their tissues for the end of ion storage and homeostasis in response to unstable calcium levels in the environment.7,8 CaCO3 is excreted in reef-building coralline algae,9 wood (vacuoles and cell walls) of oxalogenic trees,10 specialised idioblast cells in leaves of mulberry trees (Morus alba)11 or as amorphous CaCO3 cystoliths in leaves of certain angiosperms.8,12 Amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) has been detected in living organisms either as a transient phase or is stabilised by additional ions, organic macromolecules or proteins.13–15

There have been various approaches to chemically modify or functionalise the native cell wall.16–19 However, its impregnation is highly challenging and only a few studies could prove a relatively cell-wall-specific treatment, in particular with organic or silicon compounds, which resulted in improved material properties.16–19 A few approaches have been reported, where CaCO3 has been synthesised in wood using aqueous salt solutions,20 supercritical carbon dioxide21 or calcium di(methylate) and carbon dioxide.22 Ionisable surface groups of cellulose23 and other carbohydrates24 have been considered as nucleation sites for CaCO3 crystallisation. However, a systematic and eco-friendly modification of the wood cell walls with CaCO3 in aqueous solution at ambient temperature has not been achieved so far. Hence, in this study we investigate a one-pot chemical strategy for the artificial calcification of wood cell walls reminiscent of common biomineralisation pathways in nature.1,5,25

In view of practical applications, our aim is to improve one of the major shortcomings of wood, namely the high flammability26 while retaining its natural attributes such as high porosity and low density. Cellulose pyrolysis (i.e. thermal decomposition) accounts for the major heat release in the combustion of wood, involving flaming combustion of volatiles in the gas phase as well as decomposition of char by smoldering or glowing combustion.21,27 Classical flame-retardant systems (e.g. ammonium phosphate-,28 boron-,29 silica-,30 or sulphur-based31 flame retardants) influence pyrolysis processes chemically by accelerating dehydration and carbonisation, inhibiting the production of flammable volatile gases or fostering the formation of insulating coatings or char layers.32

However, many of these fire-retardant formulations present serious environmental and safety hazards due to the release of toxic or carcinogenic compounds during accidental fires, processing, recycling and usage.33 Halogen-based fire retardants, for instance, release large amounts of corrosive hydrogen halides acting as free radical traps in the flame.26 In this context, an inert and environmentally benign mineral such as CaCO3 would represent an environmentally friendly and “green” alternative to the classical flame retardants. By incorporating CaCO3 into the wood cell wall structure, the thermal stability is improved by a different mechanism, i.e. gases (e.g. water, carbon dioxide) released in the endothermic decomposition of hydrated minerals will dilute and cool down the mixture of flammable pyrolysis gases.

Hence, for the artificial calcification of wood, in particular of spruce (a softwood) and beech (a hardwood) we adapted a method originally proposed for the synthesis of ACC microparticles in aqueous solutions.34–36 This approach consists in the alkaline hydrolysis of dimethyl carbonate precursors in the presence of calcium ions inside the cell wall structure, which is depicted in Fig. 1A. Induced by a pH shift, gaseous carbon dioxide evolves in situ,34 hence concentration gradients across the bulk sample and a rapid mineral precipitation in the wood lumina are circumvented to a great extent. Due to the addition of excess sodium hydroxide solution a quantitative hydrolysis of the precursor dimethyl carbonate can be achieved, throughout the wood samples. In this study, wood samples of 2 cm edge length were completely mineralised (Fig. 1B). In this process, only water-soluble by-products, namely sodium chloride and methanol, are formed, which do not interfere with the nucleation and growth of CaCO3[thin space (1/6-em)]35 and can be easily removed by washing and/or drying. In view of process sustainability, common membrane techniques enable the separation of ternary dimethyl carbonate–methanol–water mixtures for the removal of excess unreacted DMC.37


image file: c4gc01862a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (A) Schematic depiction of the mineralisation of wood by alkaline hydrolysis of dimethyl carbonate in the presence of calcium ions within the wood matrix. (B) Photo of unmodified and mineralised spruce and beech samples (2 cm edge length). Light microscopic images of mineralised beech (C) and spruce specimens (D). The scale bars in (C) and (D) correspond to 500 μm.

As shown in Fig. 1B, the resulting wood/CaCO3 composites and native wood appear very similar macroscopically. Light microscopic images of cross-cut CaCO3/wood composites (Fig. 1C and D) indicated little calcareous minerals filling up the bigger lumina of beech vessels and earlywood tracheids of spruce. These results were confirmed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the cross-cut CaCO3/wood composites in the backscattered electron mode (Fig. 2).


image file: c4gc01862a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy of microtome cross-sections of spruce (A, C, E) and beech (B, D, F) CaCO3 composites prepared at [DMC] = [CaCl2] = 1.5 mol L−1 prior to drying. SEM images in the backscattered electron mode give evidence of relatively void lumina and depositions of electron-dense material along middle lamellae and rays, within beech fibres and parenchyma cells. Scale-bars correspond to 500 μm (A, B), 100 μm (C, D) and 20 μm (E, F).

In the case of spruce, mineral compounds seem to agglomerate prevailingly along the middle lamellae, primary cell walls and cell corners of vicinal cells where calcium-complexing pectins are abundant.38–40 Polyuronates offer natural negatively-charged polyelectrolyte calcium-binding sites where CaCO3 nucleation is favoured.39,40 Electron-rich material (i.e. CaCO3) can be observed in the cell walls of beech fibres, within parenchyma cells, as well as spruce latewood tracheids and ray cells (Fig. 2A, B, D and E respectively) at higher magnifications. Judging from the morphological features, the electron-lucent deposits appear amorphous, although further analytical characterisation of the minerals refers to dried samples due to the necessary sample preparation.

Furthermore, the mineral distribution in the wood bulk was investigated via SEM/EDX. The semi-quantitative energy-dispersive X-ray point microanalysis of the CaKα line brings a further proof of the presence of calcium-containing mineral incorporated into the wood cell walls of both species, sodium chloride as a side product of the process and unreacted calcium chloride (Fig. S12–17). Hence, the predominant mineral deposition takes place in the nano- and submicron-sized pores of the wood cell wall structure. A plausible explanation for this could be the interplay of capillary forces and the evolution of gaseous CO2. Due to the capillary forces, the liquid phase with the dissolved precursors is imbibed into the nano- and submicron pores, whereas due to the evolution of CO2 bubbles, which presumably will gather and grow in the bigger cell voids (i.e. cell lumina and vessels), the mineral precipitation in these large pores of wood is hindered. Furthermore, EDX suggests a non-quantitative reaction of CaCl2 and DMC to CaCO3 due to the highly saturated precursor solutions employed in this study. Nonetheless, the highly water-soluble salts NaCl and CaCl2 can be removed by washing in slightly basic water, as verified by XRD (Fig. S16 and 17, ESI). For an industrial application as a flame-retardant, sodium chloride in addition to CaCO3 is beneficial due to the higher overall mineral content and increased wood humidity (Fig. 7, ESI).

CaCO3 has been detected in bulk wood by infrared spectroscopy (Fig. S1, ESI) and X-ray powder diffraction (S18, ESI), but these techniques do not provide insight into the spatial distribution of CaCO3 over the wood cell hierarchy. Using confocal Raman microscopy we investigated the mineralogy and localisation of CaCO3 within the wood tissue in greater detail. The most prominent CO32− vibration absorption (ν1) of CaCO3 polymorphs lies in the spectral range of 1089–1069 cm−1[thin space (1/6-em)]41,42 partly overlapping with the cellulose bands of wood in the wavenumber area 1090–1105 cm−1.43 Spectral features allow to discriminate among the possible crystalline CaCO3 polymorphs,41 amorphous and hydrated forms.42,44 This is why small and evenly distributed amounts of CaCO3 can hardly be detected by mere peak integration. However, vertex component analysis45,46 allows for deconvoluting the hyperspectral dataset. This multivariate method furnishes representative endmember spectra for the most distinct cell wall components, namely aromatic lignin, carbohydrates, water or CaCO3. Colour-coded mappings (Fig. 3) reflect the cell wall composition by visualising the similarity between each collected spectrum and the respective endmember spectrum (Fig. 3C, F and I). An endmember with an absorption band at 1140–1160 cm−1 can be attributed to the aromatic polymer lignin (Fig. 3A and B) which is most abundant in cell corners and middle lamella at the boundary between vicinal cells. Endmembers with peaks at 1095 cm−1, 1118 cm−1 and 1151 cm−1 represent secondary (Fig. 3D–F) (S2) cell walls (Fig. S2d–f, ESI). The S1 cell wall can be discerned by a higher height of the orientation-sensitive cellulose peak at 1095 cm−1. In Fig. 3G and H, the strong ν1 (CaCO3) vibration at 1086 cm−1 together with cell-wall-sensitive spectral bands indicates the presence of calcite within spruce tracheids (Fig. 3A, D and G) and beech fibres (Fig. 3B, E and H) predominantly at the boundary between interconnected cells.


image file: c4gc01862a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Raman mappings of CaCO3/wood composites prepared at [DMC] = [CaCl2] = 1.0 mol L−1 according to VCA analysis showing endmembers of spruce (A, D, G, solid line) and beech (B, E, H, dashed line) in the range |1200–900 cm−1|. Endmember 1 (A, B): lignin-rich cell corners and middle lamellae (1125–1175 cm−1). Endmember 2 (D, E): secondary cell wall carbohydrates (1112 cm−1, 1154 cm−1). Endmember 3 (G, H): CaCO3 mineral (1080–1090 cm−1) prevailingly in middle lamella and cell corners. (C, F, I): endmember spectra for spruce (solid line) and beech (dashed line) in the range |1200–900 cm−1|. The left axes in 3C and 3I refer to spruce, the right axis to beech. Scale-bars in A, D, G correspond to 10 μm and in B, E, H to 5 μm, respectively.

To evaluate the material improvement based on the nanoscale modification, the macroscopic characteristics of the hybrid material are of particular relevance. For instance, hierarchically structured crystalline and amorphous CaCO3 minerals give rise to the superior mechanical properties of chitineous lobster skeletons.47 Using the mild modification approach of controlled DMC hydrolysis Vilela et al. reported a higher mechanical performance of CaCO3/cellulose nanocomposite materials compared to native cellulose.48 In this work we have investigated the fire behaviour of the inorganic/wood composites (in micro-scale) using pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry (PCFC) and thermogravimetric analysis. It is evident that mineralised spruce (Fig. 4A) remains physically more intact than untreated spruce after a prolonged heat treatment in a muffle furnace (20 min, 250 °C). The complex line shape of the heat release rate curves of PCFC reflects the successive pyrolysis of the wood constituents hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin, as illustrated in Fig. 4B for beech, was deconvoluted by using a multiple Gaussian fitting technique. HRR curves of spruce timber presented in Fig. S4 (ESI) show one dominant heat release rate maximum originating from the exothermic oxidation of aliphatic cellulose units at 350 °C27,32 overlapped by a high-temperature shoulder from lignin degradation present in all measured HRR spectra.49,50 Beech decomposes by a two-step (second order) process through thermal degradation of hemicelluloses at 270 °C followed by cellulose pyrolysis around 350 °C.49 The incorporation of minerals into the wood architecture affects the cellulose thermal decomposition by reducing the formation of volatiles. The fire properties, namely the total heat of combustion, the heat release capacity and the char residue are significantly improved (Fig. 4C and D, Fig. S6).


image file: c4gc01862a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (A) Photo of native spruce and spruce/CaCO3 composites after heat treatment in a muffle furnace (20 min, 250 °C). (B) Typical temperature-dependent heat release rate curves from pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry (PCFC) of beech samples after base-line correction. The key parameters total heat release (C) and heat release capacity (D) of spruce and beech are plotted as a function of the precursor concentration [DMC] = [CaCl2].

The net heat of combustion of the CaCO3/wood composites measured by pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry decreased to approximately a third (32–38%) compared to unmodified wood (Fig. 4C). A crucial indicator of fire hazard is the tendency to ignite objects nearby or to maintain flaming combustion. Thus, the potential for fire propagation is mainly assessed by the heat release capacity.51 Compared to native wood the heat release capacity of the CaCO3/wood composites was found to decrease substantially to 37% of the original value for spruce and 32% for beech (Fig. 4D). Notably, total heat release and heat release capacity values obtained for spruce/CaCO3 composites ([DMC] = 1.5 mol L−1) resemble those reported for halogenated high-performance polymers like poly(tetrafluoroethylene), Teflon™ (THR = 3.7 kJ g−1, HRC = 35 J g−1 K−1 (ref. 52)) commonly used as heat-resistant coatings. Since the char yield of the composites is approximately doubled compared to native wood (Fig. S6) the embedded mineral possibly contributes to the fire-retardant capacity of wood.

Furthermore, the incorporated CaCO3 also improves the thermal stability of wood materials. The equilibrium moisture content of the mineralised samples increased as a function of the DMC content (Fig. S7), likely due to residual sodium chloride in the wood composite, as detected by SEM-EDX (Fig. S12–17) and XRD (Fig. S18). Hence, gases (e.g. water vapour, carbon dioxide) released in the endothermic decomposition of hydrated minerals may have a diluting and cooling effect on the flammable pyrolysis gases. Furthermore, the inorganic matrix diluents also improve the fire performance by fostering the self-insulating char formation of wood and inhibiting heat transfer and smoke evolution.53,54 CaCO3, as a weak base, might catalyse the pyrolytic decomposition/depolymerisation of cellulose favouring the production of stable char and non-flammable gases over levoglucosan and other tar anhydrosugars.55–57 Additionally, TGA data confirm a lowered decomposition temperature and an increased char formation (Fig. S8–11) for the treated wood samples.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the insertion of CaCO3 into the wood scaffold is inspired by nature's invention to increase the durability and hardness and reduce the water uptake of the exoskeleton of various species. More importantly, it transfers the principle to a technical level by addressing a severe timber engineering problem. The bio-inspired mineralisation as proposed in the current work highly improves the flame retardancy of wood and hence, considerably expands its reliability in construction without impairing the intrinsic key benefits of wood arising from its biological nature. The fact that a softwood (spruce) and a hardwood (beech) gave similar results under similar treatment conditions, shows the versatility of the process. We conclude that the specific material combination of wood and CaCO3 results in a hybrid material that has the potential to become one of the key construction materials, because of its improved reliability on top of a renewable nature, positive carbon footprint, eco-friendliness, and excellent mechanical performance in view of a still comparably low density. Above all, the concept of wood–mineral nanocomposites making use of a directed mineralisation in the hierarchical scaffold of the wood material opens new ways to develop a multitude of advanced hybrid-materials, based on various mineral combinations and a vast diversity of wood species.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) and Lignum, Switzerland for the financial support of the Wood Materials Science group. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Notes and references

  1. P. Fratzl and R. Weinkamer, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2007, 52, 1263–1334 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  2. L. Salmen and A. M. Olsson, J. Pulp Pap. Sci., 1998, 24, 99–103 CAS .
  3. F. C. Meldrum, Int. Mater. Rev., 2003, 48, 187–224 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  4. S. Weiner and L. Addadi, J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, 689–702 RSC .
  5. S. Weiner and L. Addadi, in Annual Review of Materials Research, ed. D. R. Clarke and P. Fratzl, 2011, vol. 41, pp. 21–40 Search PubMed .
  6. H. J. Arnott and F. G. E. Pautard, Calcification in plants, in Biological Calcification: Cellular and molecular aspects, ed. H. Schraer, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Educational Division, Meredith Corporation, New York, 1970, pp. 375–446 Search PubMed .
  7. M. A. Webb, Plant Cell, 1999, 11, 751–761 CrossRef CAS .
  8. M. G. Taylor, K. Simkiss, G. N. Greaves, M. Okazaki and S. Mann, Proc. R. Soc. London, B, 1993, 252, 75–80 CrossRef CAS .
  9. T. F. Goreau, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1963, 109, 127–167 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  10. G. Cailleau, O. Braissant and E. P. Verrecchia, Biogeosciences, 2011, 8, 1755–1767 CrossRef CAS .
  11. I. Nitta, A. Kida, Y. Fujibayashi, H. Katayama and Y. Sugimura, Protoplasma, 2006, 228, 201–208 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. A. Gal, V. Brumfeld, S. Weiner, L. Addadi and D. Oron, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, OP77–OP83 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  13. L. Addadi, S. Raz and S. Weiner, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 959–970 CrossRef CAS .
  14. A. Gal, S. Weiner and L. Addadi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 13208–13211 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  15. J. Aizenberg, L. Addadi, S. Weiner and G. Lambert, Adv. Mater., 1996, 8, 222–226 CrossRef CAS .
  16. S. Kumar, Wood Fiber Sci., 1994, 26, 270–280 CAS .
  17. E. Cabane, T. Keplinger, V. Merk, P. Hass and I. Burgert, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 1020–1025 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  18. M. A. Ermeydan, E. Cabane, P. Hass, J. Koetz and I. Burgert, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 3313–3321 RSC .
  19. C. Mai and H. Militz, Wood Sci. Technol., 2004, 37, 339–348 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  20. C. Y. Wang, C. Y. Liu and J. Li, in Environment Materials and Environment Management Pts 1–3, ed. Z. Y. Du and X. B. Sun, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Stafa-Zurich, 2010, pp. 1712–1715 Search PubMed .
  21. C. Tsioptsias and C. Panayiotou, J. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46, 5406–5411 CrossRef CAS .
  22. S. Klaithong, D. Van Opdenbosch, C. Zollfrank and J. Plank, Z. Naturforsch., B: Chem. Sci., 2013, 68, 533–538 CrossRef CAS .
  23. H. Matahwa, V. Ramiah and R. D. Sanderson, J. Cryst. Growth, 2008, 310, 4561–4569 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  24. A. Rao, J. K. Berg, M. Kellermeier and D. Gebauer, Sweet on Biomineralization: Effects of Carbohydrates on the Early Stages of Calcium Carbonate Crystallization, Eur. J. Mineral., 2014, 26, 537 CrossRef CAS .
  25. J. W. Morse, R. S. Arvidson and A. Lüttge, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 342–381 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  26. R. M. Rowell, Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2012 Search PubMed .
  27. Y. Sekiguchi and F. Shafizadeh, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1984, 29, 1267–1286 CrossRef CAS .
  28. M. Hagen, J. Hereid, M. A. Delichatsios, J. Zhang and D. Bakirtzis, Fire Saf. J., 2009, 44, 1053–1066 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  29. G. Tondi, L. Haurie, S. Wieland, A. Petutschnigg, A. Lacasta and J. Monton, Fire Mater., 2013 Search PubMed  , n/a–n/a.
  30. I. Simkovic, H. Martonova, D. Manikova and O. Grexa, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2005, 97, 1948–1952 CrossRef CAS .
  31. I. Simkovic, H. Martvonova, D. Manikova and O. Grexa, Fire Mater., 2007, 31, 137–145 CrossRef CAS .
  32. T. Hirata, S. Kawamoto and T. Nishimoto, Fire Mater., 1991, 15, 27–36 CrossRef CAS .
  33. A. R. Horrocks, Fire retardant materials, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2001 Search PubMed .
  34. M. Faatz, F. Gröhn and G. Wegner, Adv. Mater., 2004, 16, 996–1000 CrossRef CAS .
  35. M. Faatz, F. Gröhn and G. Wegner, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 2005, 25, 153–159 CrossRef PubMed .
  36. K. Gorna, M. Hund, M. Vučak, F. Gröhn and G. Wegner, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2008, 477, 217–225 CrossRef PubMed .
  37. W. Won, X. Feng and D. Lawless, J. Membr. Sci., 2002, 209, 493–508 CrossRef CAS .
  38. K. H. Caffall and D. Mohnen, Carbohydr. Res., 2009, 344, 1879–1900 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  39. G. T. Grant, E. R. Morris, D. A. Rees, P. J. C. Smith and D. Thom, FEBS Lett., 1973, 32, 195–198 CrossRef CAS .
  40. M. C. Jarvis, Plant, Cell Environ., 1984, 7, 153–164 CAS .
  41. C. G. Kontoyannis and N. V. Vagenas, Analyst, 2000, 125, 251–255 RSC .
  42. M. M. Tlili, M. B. Amor, C. Gabrielli, S. Joiret, G. Maurin and P. Rousseau, J. Raman Spectrosc., 2002, 33, 10–16 CrossRef CAS .
  43. N. Gierlinger and M. Schwanninger, Plant Physiol., 2006, 140, 1246–1254 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  44. L. Brecevic and A. E. Nielsen, J. Cryst. Growth, 1989, 98, 504–510 CrossRef CAS .
  45. J. M. Nascimento and J. M. Bioucas Dias, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2005, 43, 898–910 CrossRef .
  46. N. Gierlinger, Front. Plant Sci., 2014, 5 Search PubMed .
  47. H. O. Fabritius, C. Sachs, P. R. Triguero and D. Roobe, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 391–400 CrossRef CAS .
  48. C. Vilela, C. S. R. Freire, P. A. A. P. Marques, T. Trindade, C. Pascoal Neto and P. Fardim, Carbohydr. Polym., 2010, 79, 1150–1156 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  49. F. Yao, Q. Wu, Y. Lei, W. Guo and Y. Xu, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2008, 93, 90–98 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  50. M. Brebu and C. Vasile, Cellul. Chem. Technol., 2010, 44, 353–363 CAS .
  51. R. E. Lyon and R. N. Walters, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2004, 71, 27–46 CrossRef CAS .
  52. R. N. Walters and R. E. Lyon, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2003, 87, 548–563 CrossRef CAS .
  53. P. Hornsby, in Fire Retardancy of Polymeric Materials, CRC Press, 2nd edn, 2009, pp. 163–185 Search PubMed .
  54. T. R. Hull, A. Witkowski and L. Hollingbery, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2011, 96, 1462–1469 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  55. F. Shafizadeh, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 1982, 3, 283–305 CrossRef CAS .
  56. C. Di Blasi, A. Galgano and C. Branca, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48, 3359–3369 CrossRef CAS .
  57. D. J. Nowakowski and J. M. Jones, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2008, 83, 12–25 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental section; IR spectra of CaCO3/wood composites; Raman endmember mappings; PCFC heat release curves; sample mass gain; char yield; equilibrium moisture content; TGA curves; TGA derivatives; semi-quantitative EDX analysis of CaCO3/wood composites, X-ray powder diffraction of mineralised spruce. See DOI: 10.1039/c4gc01862a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015