Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Tubes or sheets: divergent aggregation pathways of an amphiphilic 2,7-substituted pyrene trimer

Mykhailo Vybornyi , Yamileidi Bur-Cecilio Hechevarria , Marlene Glauser , Alexander V. Rudnev and Robert Häner *
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail: robert.haener@dcb.unibe.ch

Received 22nd June 2015 , Accepted 10th September 2015

First published on 10th September 2015


Abstract

The self-assembly of an amphiphilic 2,7-linked pyrene trimer in an aqueous environment into two morphologically related forms is described. Supramolecular polymerization leads to the simultaneous formation of nanosheets and nanotubes.


The on-demand assembly of π-conjugated molecules in morphologically-defined patterns remains a desirable task.1–5 Inspired by the multifaceted and versatile properties of graphene, two-dimensional (2D) organic materials have attracted great interest, yet their preparation and handling remain a challenge.6–10 Tubular objects are morphologically related to 2D structures, such as ribbons or sheets, and can arise from the latter via appropriate connection of edges. Thus, the formation of supramolecular nanotubes via helical intermediates is a well-documented process.11,12 The description of shape-shifting pairs of covalent polymers is limited to the graphene-to-CNT transformation.13 Supramolecular self-assembly is a versatile tool for the preparation of morphologically adaptable platforms,14,15 primarily due to the non-covalent nature of the intermolecular interactions.16–19 We recently described the use of oligoarenotides, amphiphilic phosphodiester-linked arene oligomers,20 for the “bottom-up” assembly of functional supramolecular polymers.21–23 The morphological features (nanosheets24,25 or fibers26) of the aggregates primarily depend on the substitution pattern of the aromatic units. The importance of pyrene and its derivatives as components of functional materials largely originates in the reliable control of the electronic properties via the aromatic substitution pattern as well as environmental influences.27–30 In comparison to other derivatives, 2,7-substituted pyrenes have for long been relatively little explored but recent synthetic advances31–34 triggered growing interest in these compounds. Thus, 2,7-substituted pyrenes were used for the preparation of solar cells,35 OLEDs,36 conjugated polymers,37,38 nanorings39,40 and covalent organic frameworks.41,42 Furthermore, they found applications as rotaxanes43 and tweezers44 of single-walled carbon nanotubes as well as in hydrophobic host–guest nanocages.45 In this report, we demonstrate that an amphiphilic trimer of a 2,7-substituted pyrene (27Py3) self-assembles into 2D (sheet-like) and 1D (tubular) supramolecular polymers (poly27Py3, Scheme 1).
image file: c5cc05126f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Structure of 27Py3 and illustration of self-assembled sheet-like and tubular objects.

Oligomer 27Py3 was prepared via solid-phase synthesis. The required building block was synthesized as shown in Scheme 2 (see also ESI). Briefly, 2,7-dibromopyrene (1) was converted to the 2,7-dialkynyl-substituted derivative 2via a Sonogashira reaction. After DMT-protection, the obtained intermediate 3 was converted to phosphoramidite 4. All compounds were characterized by 1H, 13C NMR and HRMS. After synthesis on solid support, oligomer 27Py3 was purified by RP-HPLC and characterized by MS (see ESI).


image file: c5cc05126f-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Synthesis of phosphoramidite building block 4.

The absorption and emission spectra of 27Py3 were recorded in an aqueous mixture (aqueous buffer containing 20% ethanol, see Fig. 1). Temperature-dependent pyrene aggregation is accompanied by pronounced spectroscopic changes. At 80 °C, the absorption spectrum consists of essentially two peaks, a very intense maximum at 273 nm and a weak maximum at 340 nm. The shape of this spectrum resembles the one recorded for 27Py3 in ethanol (see ESI). Under these conditions, 27Py3 exists as a molecularly dissolved trimer. The spectra are in-line with those reported for other 2,7-substituted pyrenes.29,46 Upon cooling of the aqueous solution from 80 °C to 20 °C, the absorption spectrum experiences significant changes in both regions as a result of trimer aggregation (→ poly27Py3). A new, blue-shifted band arises at 250 nm (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the appearance of several additional bands is observed, the most dominant ones being located at 309 and 352 nm. These changes are ascribed to exciton coupling of assembled pyrenes.24,25,47


image file: c5cc05126f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Normalized UV/Vis (solid) and fluorescence (dashed) spectra of 27Py3 at 20 °C (black) and 80 °C (red). Conditions: 27Py3 = 5 μM in a mixture of aqueous buffer (10 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH = 7.2) and ethanol 80/20 v/v; λex = 275 nm. *[thin space (1/6-em)]Second order transmission artefacts.

The fluorescence spectra of 27Py3 in an aqueous mixture consist of monomer and excimer emissions.27 The former covers the range of 380–500 nm and exhibits a well-defined vibronic structure (see also the spectrum of compound 2, ESI). For 27Py3 and its aggregates (poly27Py3) the broad and structure-less excimer band appears as an additional signal in the 400–625 nm region.

The aggregation-induced spectroscopic changes observed in aqueous solution were further substantiated by microscopic studies. AFM imaging of poly27Py3 was performed on amino-modified mica plates. The images reveal two morphological types of supramolecular polymers, nanosheets and nanotubes (Fig. 2). The nanosheets appear as large-sized 2D objects with up to 200 μm2 area and a uniform layer thickness of 2 nm. This is consistent with a model of a hydrophobic array of stacked pyrenes sandwiched between two layers of negatively charged phosphates. The nanosheets exist predominantly as mono-lamellar objects, which is explained by Coulomb repulsion between individual sheets. Alternatively, poly27Py3 exists in the form of nanotubes (Fig. 2). This morphology has rarely been observed with pyrene-containing aggregates.48 On a mica surface, the tubes appear as perfectly straight and flat bars with a thickness of 4.5 nm and a length of several micrometres. The bars exhibit a remarkably uniform width, which is in the range of 150–400 nm for individual objects (see also ESI). AFM data reveal a small but distinct difference in the thickness measured for collapsed tubes (4.5 nm) and two incidentally overlaid sheets (4.0 nm, see ESI). A thickness of 4.5 nm indicates a bilayer, which is formed by collapse of the nanotube during or after deposition and drying on the substrate surface. The increased thickness is most likely due to remnant salt, which is not removed in washing steps from the inner compartment of tubes. TEM images (Fig. 2 and ESI) confirm a tubular morphology. Tubes are characterized by a diameter in the range of 100–300 nm and a wall thickness of ∼2 nm, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Some of the tubes exhibit sheet-like sections at their ends with a thickness of 2 nm (Fig. 2B, cross-section I). It is important to note that tubes are often associated with nanosheets (Fig. 2A). This may be an indication of divergent pathways leading to the parallel development of nanotubes and nanosheets at a certain stage of supramolecular polymerization. Formation of nanotubes is only observed upon slow cooling of the solution (0.1 °C min−1), whereas fast cooling (> 10 °C min−1) only leads to nanosheets.


image file: c5cc05126f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Images of supramolecular polymers; AFM: (A) co-existing planar and tubular objects (inset: enlarged view of cross-sectional area II) and (B) nanotubes with small sheets attached; (C) TEM image. Samples were prepared via slow cooling (0.1 °C min−1); conditions: see Fig. 1.

image file: c5cc05126f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Illustration of double layer formation by collapse of a nanotube on the surface.

The self-assembly process was followed by temperature-dependent UV/Vis (Fig. 4) and fluorescence experiments (see ESI). Slow cooling (0.1 °C min−1) from 80 °C to 20 °C leads to a well-defined transition in both cases. Monitoring the absorption at 275 nm shows a transition starting at 65 °C. The process can equally be followed by monitoring excimer emission at 480 nm (see ESI).


image file: c5cc05126f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Supramolecular polymer formation curve (cooling rate 0.1 °C min−1) recorded in aqueous medium (conditions as in Fig. 1) at 275 nm.

Spectroscopic and microscopic studies suggest that 27Py3 trimers exist in the form of molecularly dissolved chains at elevated temperatures in aqueous solution. Upon slow cooling, the oligomers tend to aggregate due to strong π-stacking and hydrophobic interactions leading to the formation of supramolecular polymers (poly27Py3), which consist of an inner pyrene layer sandwiched between densely-packed negatively-charged phosphates. The assembly process results in two morphologically related types of polymers, nanosheets and nanotubes. The structural flexibility of growing supramolecular 2D-polymers47 may lead to the sporadic formation of meta-stable, bowl-shaped or other non-planar conformations in the nucleation or early elongation stages. Bowl-shaped ends are observed in TEM images. These sites can serve as seeds for alternative morphologies from which the observed nanotubes develop as a result of competing assembly pathways.

In conclusion, we have described the self-assembly properties of an amphiphilic, 2,7-linked pyrene trimer (27Py3) under aqueous conditions. Aggregation is accompanied by substantial spectroscopic changes. The supramolecular polymerization leads to the simultaneous formation of sheet-like and tubular objects. While the nanosheets exist as 2 nm thick monolayers, collapsed nanotubes are observed by AFM on the mica surface as highly regular, double-layered flat bars with a length of several micrometers. The findings are important for the design and development of functional supramolecular polymers.

This work was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (Grant 200020-149148).

Notes and references

  1. Y. Yan and Y. S. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 4325–4340 RSC.
  2. S. I. Stupp and L. C. Palmer, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 507–518 CrossRef CAS.
  3. P. A. Korevaar, T. F. De Greef and E. Meijer, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 576–586 CrossRef CAS.
  4. A. Wilson, G. Gasparini and S. Matile, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 1948–1962 RSC.
  5. S. Sengupta and F. Würthner, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 2498–2512 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. S. L. Cai, W. G. Zhang, R. N. Zuckermann, Z. T. Li, X. Zhao and Y. Liu, Adv. Mater., 2015 DOI:10.1002/adma.201500124.
  7. T. Govindaraju and M. B. Avinash, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 6102–6117 RSC.
  8. J. Sakamoto, J. van Heijst, O. Lukin and A. D. Schlüter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1030–1069 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. J. W. Colson and W. R. Dichtel, Nat. Chem., 2013, 5, 453–465 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. M. E. Canas-Ventura, K. Ait-Mansour, P. Ruffieux, R. Rieger, K. Müllen, H. Brune and R. Fasel, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 457–469 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. T. G. Barclay, K. Constantopoulos and J. Matisons, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 10217–10291 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. N. Kameta, H. Minamikawa and M. Masuda, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 4539–4561 RSC.
  13. H. E. Lim, Y. Miyata, R. Kitaura, Y. Nishimura, Y. Nishimoto, S. Irle, J. H. Warner, H. Kataura and H. Shinohara, Nat. Commun., 2013, 4, 2548 Search PubMed.
  14. N. Chandrasekhar and R. Chandrasekar, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 3556–3561 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. W. Li, Y. Kim and M. Lee, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 7711–7723 RSC.
  16. L. Yang, X. Tan, Z. Wang and X. Zhang, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 7196–7239 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. M. Ramanathan, L. K. Shrestha, T. Mori, Q. Ji, J. P. Hill and K. Ariga, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 10580–10611 RSC.
  18. D. Wang, G. Tong, R. Dong, Y. Zhou, J. Shen and X. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 11994–12017 RSC.
  19. A. Sorrenti, O. Illa and R. Ortuno, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 8200–8219 RSC.
  20. R. Häner, F. Garo, D. Wenger and V. L. Malinovskii, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7466–7471 CrossRef PubMed.
  21. V. L. Malinovskii, A. L. Nussbaumer and R. Häner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 4905–4908 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. Y. Vyborna, M. Vybornyi, A. V. Rudnev and R. Häner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 7934–7938 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. C. B. Winiger, S. Li, G. R. Kumar, S. M. Langenegger and R. Häner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 13609–13613 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. M. Vybornyi, A. V. Rudnev, S. M. Langenegger, T. Wandlowski, G. Calzaferri and R. Häner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 11488–11493 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. M. Vybornyi, A. Rudnev and R. Häner, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 1426–1431 CrossRef CAS.
  26. A. V. Rudnev, V. L. Malinovskii, A. L. Nussbaumer, A. Mishchenko, R. Häner and T. Wandlowski, Macromolecules, 2012, 45, 5986–5992 CrossRef CAS.
  27. F. M. Winnik, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 587–614 CrossRef CAS.
  28. T. M. Figueira-Duarte and K. Müllen, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 7260–7314 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. A. G. Crawford, A. D. Dwyer, Z. Liu, A. Steffen, A. Beeby, L. O. Palsson, D. J. Tozer and T. B. Marder, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 13349–13362 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. Örücü and N. Acar, Comput. Theor. Chem., 2015, 1056, 11–18 CrossRef PubMed.
  31. Y. Q. He and Y. W. Zhong, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3411–3414 RSC.
  32. S.-I. Kawano, M. Baumgarten, D. Chercka, V. Enkelmann and K. Müllen, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5058–5060 RSC.
  33. J. M. Casas-Solvas, J. D. Howgego and A. P. Davis, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 212–232 CAS.
  34. A. G. Crawford, Z. Liu, I. A. Mkhalid, I. M. H. Thibault, N. Schwarz, G. Alcaraz, A. Steffen, J. C. Collings, A. S. Batsanov, J. A. Howard and T. B. Marder, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18, 5022–5035 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. S. S. Li, K. J. Jiang, C. C. Yu, J. H. Huang, L. M. Yang and Y. L. Song, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 4404–4408 RSC.
  36. D. Chercka, S. J. Yoo, M. Baumgarten, J. J. Kim and K. Müllen, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 9083–9086 RSC.
  37. H. Chen, X. Hu and S. C. Ng, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2010, 48, 5562–5569 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. S.-I. Kawano, C. Yang, M. Ribas, S. Baluschev, M. Baumgarten and K. Müllen, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 7933–7937 CrossRef CAS.
  39. T. Iwamoto, E. Kayahara, N. Yasuda, T. Suzuki and S. Yamago, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6430–6434 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. A. Yagi, G. Venkataramana, Y. Segawa and K. Itami, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 957–959 RSC.
  41. Y. Zhou, Z. Wang, P. Yang, X. Zu and F. Gao, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 16964–16970 RSC.
  42. S. Wan, J. Guo, J. Kim, H. Ihee and D. Jiang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 5439–5442 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. A. Lopez-Moreno and E. M. Perez, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 5421–5424 RSC.
  44. G. Liu, A. F. M. M. Rahman, S. Chaunchaiyakul, T. Kimura, Y. Kuwahara and N. Komatsu, Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 16221–16230 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. T. K. Ronson, A. B. League, L. Gagliardi, C. J. Cramer and J. R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 15615–15624 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. A. O. El-Ballouli, R. S. Khnayzer, J. C. Khalife, A. Fonari, K. M. Hallal, T. V. Timofeeva, D. Patra, F. N. Castellano, B. Wex and B. R. Kaafarani, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2013, 272, 49–57 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. N. Micali, M. Vybornyi, P. Mineo, O. Khorev, R. Häner and V. Villari, Chem. – Eur. J., 2015, 21, 9505–9513 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. Y. Chen, B. Zhu, Y. Han and Z. Bo, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 4927–4931 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthetic and analytical details, additional spectra and images. See DOI: 10.1039/c5cc05126f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.