Maxim A.
Nasalevich
*a,
Maarten G.
Goesten
a,
Tom J.
Savenije
b,
Freek
Kapteijn
a and
Jorge
Gascon
*a
aCatalysis Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, Delft, 2628 BL, The Netherlands. E-mail: M.Nasalevich@tudelft.nl; Fax: +31 1527 85006; Tel: +31 1527 84851
bOptoelectronic Materials, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, Delft, 2628 BL, The Netherlands
First published on 9th December 2014
Correction for ‘Enhancing optical absorption of metal–organic frameworks for improved visible light photocatalysis’ by Maxim A. Nasalevich et al., Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 10575–10577.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Diffuse reflectance spectra of the materials investigated in this study: MIL-125(Ti) (grey), NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (orange) and MR-MIL-125(Ti) (red). |
As a consequence of this revision, the following statements and calculations are affected:
1. The revised effective HOMO–LUMO gaps for NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and MR-MIL-125(Ti) are 2.68 and 2.12 eV, respectively.
2. MR-MIL-125(Ti) absorbs 40% more visible light compared to the pristine NH2-MIL-125(Ti), in contrast to the previously claimed 100%.
3. Fig. S4 and S13 have been revised as shown below:
![]() | ||
Fig. S4 The incident light power that could be potentially absorbed by NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (blue) and MR-MIL-125(Ti) (red). |
Despite these corrections, the main message of the manuscript is not affected. Moreover, after recalculating the absorption properties of MR-MIL-125(Ti), the 40% increase in light absorption relative to the unfunctionalized sample results in a 40% higher rate in the photocatalytic transformation. Thus, the reported post-functionalization improvement is even more effective than claimed in the published article due to the proportional enhancement of the photocatalytic activity.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |