A. Shahul Hameeda,
M. V. Reddy*bc,
B. V. R. Chowdarib and
Jagadese J. Vittal*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543. E-mail: chmjjv@nus.edu.sg; Fax: +65-6779-1691
bAdvanced Batteries Lab, Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117542. E-mail: phymvvr@nus.edu.sg; Fax: +65-6777-6126
cDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
First published on 10th November 2014
Porous reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/Fe3O4 nanocomposites have been prepared in this study by a simple precipitation reaction followed by freeze drying. When the sample was dried at 80 °C, spinel phase of Fe3O4 wrapped by rGO sheets was obtained without any detectable impurities. It exhibits a high surface area of 30 m2 g−1. The rGO/Fe3O4 composites were also annealed under different conditions such as 600 °C in Ar, 700 °C in Ar and 700 °C in Ar–H2 to understand the effect of annealing temperature on the electrochemical properties. The rGO content in the samples was found to be ∼3–4% in all the composites from CHNS analysis. Electrochemical properties of the different composites were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic cycling and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies. The composite prepared at 80 °C exhibits very high capacity of 1254 mA h g−1 for the first charge cycle. However, the capacity faded to 1046 mA h g−1 at the end of 40 cycles. Though the high temperature annealed samples show slightly decreased capacity, they show excellent capacity retention with good rate capability. The rGO/Fe3O4 composite obtained at 700 °C in Ar–H2 exhibits high reversible capacity of 480 mA h g−1 at a high current density of 3000 mA g−1.
The magnetite phase (Fe3O4) is one of the attractive anodes and exhibits a normal spinel structure in which the divalent and trivalent cations occupy tetrahedral and octahedral sites respectively. It undergoes reversible lithium storage via a conversion reaction with reversible formation of Fe nanoparticles in Li2O matrix. It has a theoretical capacity of 926 mA h g−1, assuming 8 moles of Li storage per mole of Fe3O4.
Lithium storage properties of iron oxide were reported to improve with size reduction to nanoparticles, owing to good Li transport as well as the easing of the strain created by the conversion reaction.16 These improved electrochemical properties of the nanoparticles have motivated the synthesis of Fe3O4 at the nanoscale by various routes like solvothermal,17,18 hydrothermal,19,20 carbothermal reduction,21 sol–gel,22 electrospinning,23 etc. for application in Li-ion batteries. In addition, different strategies like carbon coating24–26 and compositing with CNT27,28 and graphene29–31 have also been employed for the improvement of electronic conductivity of the material.
In this study, reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-wrapped magnetite nanoparticles were prepared by a simple precipitation method. Precipitation of GO/FeSO4 solution by addition of NH4OH, followed by freeze drying of the colloidal mixture resulted in the formation of rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites. An investigation of the effect of annealing temperature on the electrochemical properties of these composites has found a stable and very high reversible capacity of the composites with good rate capability.
The partially oxidized graphite powder (2 g) was slowly added to 50 mL of cold (0 °C) conc. H2SO4 and 6 g of KMnO4 was added in small amounts with continuous stirring so that the temperature of the mixture was never allowed to reach 20 °C. After complete addition of KMnO4, the temperature of the mixture was increased to 35 °C and stirred for another 2 h. Then, 200 mL of distilled water was added carefully. After 15 min, the reaction was terminated by addition of ∼1 L of distilled water and 5 mL of 35% H2O2 when the colour of the mixture changed to bright yellow. The mixture was filtered and washed with 1:10 HCl solution (500 mL) to remove the residual metal ions. The resulting product was washed and suspended in distilled water to prepare 0.1% (w/v) solution. To prepare GO, the graphite oxide dispersion was exfoliated by sonication in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The resulting GO solution was yellowish brown in colour and was stable for a period of a few months.
Electrochemical properties of the samples were investigated using coin cells (type 2016) with Li metal (Kyokuto Metal Co., Japan) as counter electrode, a glass microfiber filter (GF/F, Whatman International Ltd, Maidstone, England) as the separator and 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate, dimethyl carbonate and diethyl carbonate (1:1:1 v/v, Merck) as the electrolyte. Firstly, a slurry was prepared by mixing the sample with super P carbon black (15 wt%) and PVDF binder, Kynar 2801 (15 wt%) in N-methylpyrrolidone solvent. The slurry was stirred for 12 h and then coated onto an etched copper foil, dried at 80 °C and cut into circular discs of 16 mm in diameter. Coin cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glove box (MBraun, Germany) with oxygen and water concentration maintained below 1 ppm, by crimp sealing the thus fabricated anode with lithium metal as counter electrode. The cells were aged for 8 h before they were subjected to electrochemical testing. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic discharge–charge cycling studies of the cells were carried out at room temperature using a computer controlled MacPile II (Bio-logic, France) and a Bitrode multiple battery tester (model SCN, Bitrode, USA), respectively. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out in the frequency range of 180 kHz to 0.003 Hz using a Solartron 1260A impedance analyzer.
Raman spectroscopy is an important technique to characterize graphene-based materials. Fig. S1† shows the Raman spectra of different rGO/Fe3O4 composites recorded at room temperature in the range of 2000–1000 cm−1. Bare GO shows Raman bands at 1600 and 1350 cm−1 which are described as G and D bands respectively. The D band refers to the defects and disordered atomic arrangement due to the sp3-carbon atoms and the vibration of the sp2-carbon atoms in the two-dimensional lattice gives rise to the G band. Upon reduction of GO to rGO, the intensity ratio of the D band to the G band (ID/IG) increases. In the case of different rGO/Fe3O4 composites, the characteristic G and D bands appear at ∼1580 and ∼1350 cm−1 respectively. The ID/IG ratios for the composites are greater than 1 except the sample annealed at 700 °C in Ar which shows a ratio slightly less than 1. This higher ID/IG ratio of the rGO/Fe3O4 composites indicates the in situ reduction of GO. The G band of the composites shifts by ∼20 cm−1 which indicates the incorporation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into the rGO layers.
Morphology and particle size of the different rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites were probed using SEM and TEM techniques. Fig. 3 shows the SEM images of the nanocomposites. The sample obtained at 80 °C consists of nanoparticles of size ∼20–50 nm wrapped by rGO layers (Fig. 3b). The rGO layers can be seen clearly from the TEM image (Fig. 4a). The presence of rGO along with the Fe3O4 nanoparticles is expected to improve the electronic conductivity compared to bare Fe3O4. With an increase in the annealing temperature to 600 °C, the particles form aggregates as seen in Fig. 3d. However, the individual particle size was still ∼50–100 nm. With further increase in the annealing temperature to 700 °C in Ar, the particles fuse together to form bigger particles of ∼50–200 nm in size. Loss of some rGO content at higher temperature also plays a role in the fusion of individual particles.
Fig. 3 Scanning electron micrographs of rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites annealed at (a & b) 80 °C in air, (c & d) 600 °C in Ar, (e & f) 700 °C in Ar and (g & h) 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
Fig. 4 Transmission electron micrographs of rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites annealed at (a) 80 °C in air, (b & c) 600 °C in Ar and (d) 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the rGO/Fe3O4 composites are shown in Fig. 5. The rGO/Fe3O4 (80 °C) shows a high BET surface area of 30 m2 g−1 though the amount of rGO in the composite was only 4%. This high surface area can be attributed to the small particle size of Fe3O4 and the presence of rGO sheets in the composite. The samples annealed at higher temperatures show decreased surface area due to an increase in the particle size, aggregation and slight decrease in the rGO content. The BET surface area, pore size and pore volume of the different rGO/Fe3O4 samples are compared in Table S1.†
Fig. 5 Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites annealed at 80 °C in air and 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
Fig. 6 Galvanostatic cycling studies showing charge–discharge profiles of rGO/Fe3O4 synthesized at (a) 80 °C in air, (b) 600 °C in Ar, (c) 700 °C in Ar and (d) 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
The first discharge curves of all the rGO/Fe3O4 composites are different from the remaining cycles indicating a different lithium storage mechanism during the initial discharge. It starts from the open circuit voltage (∼2.9 V) and shows a steep decrease in the voltage to 1.6 V followed by two small plateaus at ∼1.4 and ∼1.0 V. These plateaus correspond to the Li intercalation into Fe3O4 forming a lithium intercalated phase, LixFe3O4 (x ≈ 2), as shown in eqn (1). During this reaction, the two Fe3+ ions in Fe3O4 are reduced to Fe2+. Except for the sample prepared at 700 °C in Ar, this plateau was observed for all the composites. Further decrease in the voltage results in lithiation of the intercalated phase as indicated by a large plateau at ∼0.85 V. During this process, 6 more moles of Li are consumed as per eqn (2), resulting in an irreversible destruction of the crystal structure. This process is accompanied by the reduction of all Fe2+ ions to Fe metal nanoparticles which are embedded in an amorphous Li2O matrix.35 Thus 8 moles of Li are utilized per mole of Fe3O4, corresponding to a theoretical capacity of 926 mA h g−1. However, the first discharge capacities observed for rGO/Fe3O4 obtained at 80 °C (air), 600 °C (Ar), 700 °C (Ar) and 700 °C (Ar–H2) were 1855, 1716, 1406 and 1554 mA h g−1 respectively. This additional capacity can be explained by the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI) by the reaction of lithium with the solvents of the electrolyte.24,36 In addition, rGO present in the samples (3–4%) also contributes to lithium storage and SEI formation.30
During the first charge cycle, lithium is extracted from the material at ∼1.4–2.0 V as indicated by a sloping plateau. The Li2O and Fe nanoparticles formed during the initial discharge cycle react with each other to form iron oxide according to eqn (3). The first charge capacities obtained for rGO/Fe3O4 synthesized at 80 °C in air, 600 °C in Ar, 700 °C in Ar and 700 °C in Ar–H2 were 1254, 1082, 853 and 1001 mA h g−1 respectively. The second discharge curve for each sample is different from the first discharge cycle. The second and subsequent cycles rely on the reversible conversion of iron oxide to Fe nanoparticles embedded in Li2O matrix. The voltage of the discharge plateau also shifts to ∼1.0 V compared to 0.85 V observed for the first cycle.
Fe3O4 + xLi+ + xe− → LixFe3O4 | (1) |
LixFe3O4 + (8 − x)Li+ + (8 − x)e− → 3Fe + 4Li2O | (2) |
3Fe + 4Li2O ↔ Fe3O4 + 8Li+ + 8e− | (3) |
The conversion reaction happening in the rGO/Fe3O4 anodes is found to be highly reversible as inferred from the overlapping charge–discharge curves of the different cycles (Fig. 6). The variation of charge and discharge capacities with cycle number of the different composites and their corresponding coulombic efficiencies are shown in Fig. 7. The sample obtained at 80 °C shows the highest charge capacity of 1254 mA h g−1 for the first cycle which can be attributed to smaller particle size and high surface area. However, the cycling stability was slightly reduced resulting in a capacity of 1046 mA h g−1 at the end of 40 cycles which is still higher than the theoretical capacity. Upon increase in the annealing temperature, the particle size of Fe3O4 increases and hence the surface area decreases dramatically. The sample obtained at 600 °C in Ar shows a slightly lesser capacity of 1082 mA h g−1 for the first cycle. However, it exhibits better cycling stability with a capacity of 1062 mA h g−1 obtained at the end of 40 cycles.
Fig. 7 Capacity vs. cycle number plots of rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites synthesized at (a) 80 °C in air, (b) 600 °C in Ar, (c) 700 °C in Ar and (d) 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
With further increase in annealing temperature to 700 °C, the capacity decreases further due to slightly decreased graphene content and increased particle size. The charge capacity obtained for the samples annealed at 700 °C in Ar and Ar–H2 were 853 and 1001 mA h g−1. However, capacity retention of these samples was found to be excellent with reversible capacity of 854 and 972 mA h g−1 obtained after 40 cycles. In addition, all the composites possess a high coulombic efficiency of ∼99%. The details of the charge and discharge capacities of the individual samples for the 1st, 2nd and 40th cycles are listed in Table 1. Though the reversible capacities obtained for these composites are quite high and stable, high polarization of ∼0.6 V is observed which is characteristic of these oxides. Though many reports on rGO/Fe3O4 appear in the literature, the graphene/rGO contents in the samples were very high leading to good capacity.37–40 In this study, better electrochemical performance was achieved for the rGO/Fe3O4 samples, even though the rGO content was only 3–4%.
Compound | Discharge capacity (mA h g−1) | Charge capacity (mA h g−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st cycle | 2nd cycle | 40th cycle | 1st cycle | 2nd cycle | 40th cycle | |
rGO/Fe3O4 80 °C in air | 1855 | 1236 | 1047 | 1254 | 1127 | 1046 |
rGO/Fe3O4 600 °C in Ar | 1716 | 1105 | 1080 | 1082 | 1063 | 1062 |
rGO/Fe3O4 700 °C in Ar | 1406 | 911 | 865 | 853 | 869 | 854 |
rGO/Fe3O4 700 °C in Ar–H2 | 1554 | 978 | 977 | 1001 | 960 | 972 |
Fig. 9 Cyclic voltammograms of rGO/Fe3O4 synthesized at (a) 80 °C in air, (b) 600 °C in Ar, (c) 700 °C in Ar and (d) 700 °C in Ar–H2. |
In the case of the sample annealed at 700 °C in Ar, the peak at 0.8 V did not appear, similar to the galvanostatic cycling results. Upon further discharge to the cut-off voltage of 0.005 V, a sharp peak appears at ∼0.5–0.6 V, which corresponds to crystal structure destruction of Fe3O4 forming Fe nanoparticles embedded in Li2O matrix. This peak was not seen in the subsequent cycles, indicating the irreversible nature of the first discharge cycle (eqn (2)). The first anodic scan shows two overlapped peaks at ∼1.7 V which correspond to the oxidation of Fe to form Fe3O4 (eqn (3)). In the subsequent cycles, a single broad peak was observed at 0.7–0.8 V for the different composites during cathodic scans and at 2.0 V during the anodic scans. Similar redox potentials have been reported for magnetite anode materials. The overlapping CV curves also indicate the excellent reversibility of lithium cycling in the materials.
Fig. S3a† compares the Nyquist plots obtained at open circuit voltage for all the different composites. They show a single semicircle with an overall impedance of ∼220–250 Ω except for the 80 °C sample which shows only 120 Ω. This large semicircle is attributed mainly to the high surface film resistance Rsf and the associated capacitance, CPEsf. With the onset of lithium insertion, the surface film resistance is expected to decrease and the charge transfer resistance increases. The overall impedance has been observed to be ∼60–80 Ω at the fully discharged state (0.005 V) as shown in Fig. S3b† where the Fe3O4 particles are disintegrated to Fe metal nanoparticles in Li2O matrix.
Detailed EIS measurements were carried out for the rGO/Fe3O4 composite prepared at 700 °C in Ar–H2. EIS data were collected for the sample at different voltages for the 1st charge and discharge cycles as shown in Fig. 10. During the discharge cycle, the impedance decreases with the commencement of lithiation and reaches ∼70 Ω at the fully discharged state. During the charge cycle, the impedance was very low (15–20 Ω) in the plateau region indicating good conductivity of the sample.
Fig. 10 Nyquist plots of rGO/Fe3O4 (700 °C Ar–H2) at different voltages for (a) 1st discharge cycle and (b) 1st charge cycle. |
The composites were also subjected to 40 charge–discharge cycles and the EIS data were recorded at the discharged state (Fig. S3c†). As can be seen, the impedance was very low, ∼20 Ω, for all the samples except the sample annealed at 600 °C in Ar. This explains the good cycling stability of the composites. The fast capacity fading of the sample prepared at 600 °C in Ar can be explained by its high impedance compared to the other samples.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra11948g |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |