A long-wave optical pH sensor based on red upconversion luminescence of NaGdF4 nanotubes

Song Wang, Jing Feng*, Shuyan Song and Hongjie Zhang*
State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China. E-mail: fengj@ciac.ac.cn; hongjie@ciac.ac.cn; Fax: +86-431-85698041; Tel: +86-431-8526-2127

Received 3rd September 2014 , Accepted 17th October 2014

First published on 17th October 2014


Abstract

A long-wave optical pH sensor based on intense red upconversion (UC) luminescence of NaGdF4 nanotubes and bromothymol blue was explored. By detecting the UC spectra of NaGdF4 nanotubes in aqueous solution, the sensing system could work on the pH measurement. The intensities of the red emission were linear with pH value changing from 6 to 8.


Upconversion is an anti-Stokes process that involves the conversion of lower-energy photon radiation (usually near-infrared) into higher-energy output emissions. The unique luminescence properties of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted great attention in various research fields, owing to their fundamental scientific importance and potential applications in lasers, optical data storage, biological imaging, analytical sensors for heavy metals and pH value, photodynamic therapy, and solar energy conversion.1–7

The optical pH sensors respond to pH value with change in optical properties. An ideal sensor shows a clear trend towards operating at wavelengths higher than 500 nm.8,9 It is because most biological matter shows strong absorption and background luminescence in the UV and visible light below 500 nm to some degree. Lanthanide-doped UCNPs possess attractive features including low autofluorescence, long-wavelength light emitting at 980 nm, low cytotoxicity, less scattering and absorption, deep penetration in biological samples and normally long-wavelength light emissions (longer than 500 nm). This makes lanthanide-doped UNCPs good alternatives for pH sensors in biological applications.10–17 As mentioned above, UCNPs could become ideal pH sensors by properly designing the UC emissions to get proper long-wavelength emissions. Sun and co-workers designed the first optical pH sensor based on the phenomenon of upconversion luminescence and a hydrogel matrix.18 They also indicated that the pH sensor may act as a transducer in sensors for acidic gases or basic gases, and in enzymatic biosensors where protons are consumed or produced.

Herein the successful synthesis of lanthanide-doped NaGdF4 nanotubes by a hydrothermal and subsequent ion-exchange route were presented. NaGdF4 nanotubes could be easily dispersed in water and exhibit intense red upconversion luminescence centered at 650 nm. When combined with bromothymol blue (BTB), the system can easily perform pH measurements by using a 980 nm NIR laser as the excitation source and detecting UC luminescence. The luminescent intensity of lanthanide-doped NaGdF4 nanotubes is linear with the respect to pH values ranging from 6 to 8.

NaGdF4 nanotubes were prepared by hydrothermal and in situ ion exchange processes according to the reference (see ESI).19,20 The typical morphologies of the as-synthesized precursors are shown in Fig. 1. A number of uniform nanotubes with diameter around 200 nm and length about 1.2 μm could be clearly observed. The hollow nature of the 1D Gd(OH)3 nanostructure was observed by TEM investigations. And the XRD patterns of the nanotubes indicated that the as-prepared sample was hexagonal Gd(OH)3 (JCPDS: 83-2037) (Fig. S1).


image file: c4ra09686j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 SEM (A and B), TEM (C), and high-resolution TEM (D) image of as-prepared Gd(OH)3 nanotubes.

The influences of experimental parameters on the final morphology of the Gd(OH)3 samples were studied. From the SEM images, it was determined that the Gd3+ concentration influences the diameter of the Gd(OH)3 nanotubes. High Gd3+concentration leads to a large diameter and well-dispersed nanotubes (Fig. S2). When the added amount of NH4+ is less than 0.3 mL, no tubular shape sample can be obtained (Fig. S3A). The tubular-shaped sample could be obtained by adding more than 0.6 mL NH4+. Higher concentrations of NH4+ lead to well-dispersed and smaller-diameter nanotubes (Fig. S3).

NaGdF4 nanotubes were obtained by an in situ ion exchange process by using NaF and HF. The XRD patterns of the sample after the ion exchange indicated a hexagonal phase for NaGdF4 (JCPDS: 27-0699) (Fig. S1B). The characteristic morphology of the nanotubes remained unchanged after the ion exchange process (Fig. 2B). However, after the ion exchange, the porous structure appeared on the tube wall (Fig. 2D). In order to enhance the UC luminescence, the as-prepared NaGdF4 nanotubes were calcinated at 400 °C for 4 h. Importantly, the morphology of the nanotubes remains almost the same due to higher activation energies needed for the collapse of these structures (Fig. 2C).


image file: c4ra09686j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM images of as-prepared samples: (A) before ion exchange, (B) after ion exchange, (C) after calcinations, and (D) TEM image of NaGdF4 nanotubes.

The UC PL properties of 20%Yb3+/2%Er3+ co-doped NaGdF4 nanotubes after calcination were investigated. The typical UC PL spectrum of NaGdF4:20%Yb3+/2%Er3+ nanotubes excited by using a 980 nm continuous-wave laser diode is shown in Fig. S4. The NaGdF4 nanotubes showed intense red emissions centered at 650 nm (4F9/24I15/2) and very weak green emissions at 550 nm (4S3/24I15/2) and 520 nm (2H11/24I15/2). It is known that blood has a very narrow optical window at around 660–700 nm.18 UC spectra of NaGdF4 nanotubes fall precisely into this region. Thus, the as-prepared NaGdF4 nanotubes may serve as an ideal sensor for blood in room air.

BTB is a non-toxic pH probe that undergoes distinct colour changes as pH changes, and covers the physiological pH range. Its absorption spectra in the buffer solution were investigated for pH values ranging from 3 to 8 (see Fig. 3). The pKa value of BTB in water at 25 °C has been reported to be 6.82.21 The colour of BTB changes with pH from yellow (pH < 6) to green (pH = 6–7) and then to blue (at pH ≥ 8). Depending on whether BTB is present in its (blue) base form or in its (yellow) weak acidic form, the probe was expected to exert an insignificant inner filter effect on the red emission of nanotubes.


image file: c4ra09686j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Absorption spectra of BTB at pH value from 3 to 8; inset shows linear relationship of 600 nm absorption with an accurate pH value from 6 to 8.

The pH-sensing experiments were performed with BTB and NaGdF4 nanotubes in water. By changing the pH of the system, the intensities of the system's red emissions (excited by the 980 nm laser) vary with pH, even though the nanotubes exhibited an emission that is independent of pH value. More importantly, the intensities of the red emissions were linear with the change of pH value from 6 to 8 (Fig. 4). Thus, it was indicated that this system has the potential to accurately determine the local pH value of blood in room air. In particular, the pH value around cancer cells is about 6.8, which is lower than normal human cells (7.0–7.4).22,23 Thus, this system may be used in the detection of cancer cells in future. Moreover, the system may be used for accurate determination of local pH values inside cells.


image file: c4ra09686j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 UC PL spectra of NaGdF4:20%Yb3+/2%Er3+ nanotubes in buffer solutions at pH values from 6 to 8; inset shows linear relationship of red emissions with accurate pH values from 6 to 8.

In conclusion, UC PL NaGdF4 nanotubes were synthesized by a hydrothermal and ion-exchange process. The influence of the experimental parameters on sample morphology was investigated. When combined with BTB, NaGdF4 nanotubes can work on pH measurement by detecting the UC PL spectra in aqueous solutions. More importantly, the intensities of the red emission are linear with the change in pH value from 6 to 8. This system has great potential for pH measurement of blood in room air, especially for cancer detection.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for financial aid from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos 21371165, 51372242, 91122030, and 21210001), National Natural Science Foundation for Creative Research Group (grant no. 21221061), and Jilin Province Youth Foundation (201201008).

Notes and references

  1. E. Downing, L. Hesselink, J. Ralston and R. Macfarlane, Science, 1996, 273, 1185 CAS.
  2. B. E. Cohen, Nature, 2010, 467, 407 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. B. M. van der Ende, L. Aartsa and A. Meijerink, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 11081 RSC.
  4. G. Wang, Q. Peng and Y. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 322 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. J. Chen and J. X. J. Zhao, Sensors, 2012, 12, 2414 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Y. H. Wang, H. G. Wang, D. P. Liu, S. Y. Song, X. Wang and H. J. Zhang, Biomaterials, 2013, 31, 7715 CrossRef PubMed.
  7. M. Pang, X. S. Zhai, J. Feng, S. Y. Song, R. P. Deng, Z. Wang, S. Yao, X. Ge and H. J. Zhang, Dalton Trans., 2014, 26, 10202 RSC.
  8. J. N. Miller and U. Resch-Genger, Long-Wavelength and Near-Infrared Fluorescence: State of the Art, Future Applications, and Standards, Springer, Berlin, 2008, vol. 5, p. 147 Search PubMed.
  9. M. J. Hall, L. T. Allen and D. F. O'Shea, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 776 CAS.
  10. J. C. Boyer, M. P. Manseau, J. I. Murray and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 1157 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. Q. Liu, M. Chen, Y. Sun, G. Chen, T. Yang, Y. Gao, X. Zhang and F. Li, Biomaterials, 2011, 32, 8243 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. S. A. Hilderbrand, F. W. Shao, C. Salthouse, U. Mahmood and R. Weissleder, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4188 RSC.
  13. J. Zhou, Y. Sun, X. Du, L. Xiong, H. Hu and F. Li, Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 3287 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. N. Shan, J. B. Chen, J. Meng, J. Collins, W. Soboyejo, J. S. Friedberg and Y. G. Ju, J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 104, 094308 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. G. K. Das, P. P. Y. Chan, A. Teo, J. S. C. Loo, J. M. Anderson and T. T. Y. Tan, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 2009, 93, 337 Search PubMed.
  16. H. Zijlmans, J. Bonnet, J. Burton, K. Kardos, T. Vail, R. S. Niedbala and H. J. Tanke, Anal. Biochem., 1999, 267, 30 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. L. Xiong, Z. Chen, Q. Tian, T. Cao, C. Xu and F. Li, Anal. Chem., 2009, 81, 8687 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. L. N. Sun, H. S. Peng, M. I. J. Stich, D. Achatz and O. S. Wolfbeis, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5000 RSC.
  19. G. Jia, K. Liu, Y. H. Zheng, Y. H. Song, M. Yang and H. P. You, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 6050 CAS.
  20. F. Zhang and D. Y. Zhao, ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 159 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. T. E. Edmonds, N. J. Flatters, C. F. Jones and J. N. Miller, Talanta, 1988, 35, 103 CrossRef CAS.
  22. F. Tannock and D. Rotin, Cancer Res., 1989, 49, 4373 Search PubMed.
  23. H. Maeda, J. Wu, T. Sawa, Y. Matsumura and K. Hori, J. Controlled Release, 2000, 65, 271 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedures; XRD patterns of as-prepared samples; SEM images of samples, UC PL and absorption spectra of samples. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra09686j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.