One-dimensional core–shell cellulose-akaganeite hybrid nanocrystals: synthesis, characterization, and magnetic field induced self-assembly

Mahdi Mashkour*a, Tsunehisa Kimurab, Fumiko Kimurab, Mozhdeh Mashkoura and Mehdi Tajvidic
aFaculty of Wood and Paper Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, 49189-43464, Iran. E-mail: mashkour@gau.ac.ir
bFibrous Biomaterials Lab., Division of Forest and Biomaterials Science, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan
cSchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA

Received 29th August 2014 , Accepted 24th September 2014

First published on 24th September 2014


Abstract

Cellulose akaganeite hybrid nanocrystals (CAHNCs) were synthesized in situ from a ferrous chloride aqueous solution in the presence of pre-oxidized cellulose nanocrystals as a reducing agent for the reduction of dissolved ferrous ions under heat treatment and neutral gas flow. The characterization of the produced nanostructures by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) confirmed that the fabricated one-dimensional nanoparticles were composed of rod-like cellulose nanocrystal cores coated by the shells of spherical chloride-containing akaganeite nanoparticles with an average diameter of about 4–6 nm, and they had superparamagnetic properties. To compare the magnetic response of the synthetized CAHNCs with the starting diamagnetic CNCs, the static magnetic fields of 1, 2, 4, and 8 T generated by a superconducting magnet were applied to the suspensions of either material during the dewatering process. In contrast to the CNCs, the CAHNCs were well-aligned under magnetic field intensity of 4 T and above. Moreover, the magnetic susceptibility of the CAHNCs was different from that of the CNCs by exhibiting magnetic field induced self-assembly parallel to the external magnetic field direction. Cellulose akaganeite hybrid microcrystals (CAHMCs) were added to the system as micro-scale models, which also confirmed the magnetic field induced self-assembly. Polarizing optical microscopy, FESEM, and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) strongly confirmed the unidirectional magnetic field induced self-assembly of the CAHNCs parallel to the external magnetic field even under the magnetic intensity of 2 T. The reasons behind these observations are extensively discussed.


Introduction

One-dimensional organic–inorganic core–shell hybrid nanostructures (1D-OICSHNSs) have recently attracted a significant attention because of their outstanding geometry and size dependent physicochemical and mechanical properties.1–3 The promising potential applications of these heterostructure nanomaterials in modern high-tech industries and research fields related to designing and fabricating advanced functional materials, such as high-performance super capacitors, batteries and solar cells, photo catalysts, self-cleaning surfaces, smart and anti-corrosive coatings, sensors, electronic devices and electromagnetic absorbers, have encouraged material scientists to focus on the synthesis and characterization of these nanomaterials.3–6 The intriguing properties of the synthesized OICSHNSs are derived from a synergistic combination of properties of both the organic core and the inorganic shell components.6 Using polymeric materials to be the core part of the heterostructure nanoparticles has some significant advantages such as lighter final products, easier processability, the possibility for removing the core and the availability of a vast variety of polymers with different properties tailored for the final desired performance.2,7 The high specific surface area of the polymeric nanoparticles having surface-active functional groups can provide an appropriate substrate for the nucleation and controlled growth of desired inorganic nanoparticles and the formation of OICSHNSs. According to the literature, functionalized polystyrene and latex are the most prominent polymers used as the core part of the OICSHNSs.8–11 To the best of our knowledge, there is no successful report on fabricating zero or one-dimensional OICSHNSs based on a cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) core, although the outstanding physicochemical and mechanical properties of the CNCs have been well known for more than two decades. The rod-like shaped CNCs have recently attracted a significant attention for advanced applications in the fields of composite materials, optic and electronic industries, aerospace engineering and medicine.12,13 Having a low density (∼1.6 g cm−3) along with a very high stiffness (∼140 GPa) and strength (∼10 GPa), high surface to volume and aspect ratios, very low coefficients of thermal expansion and biocompatibility are some of the most promising unique properties that showcase the CNCs to be the advanced materials for the future.13,14 These excellent and unique properties along with a highly reactive and readily functionalizable surface, which is inherently densely covered with hydroxyl (–OH) functional groups make the CNCs a promising high potential candidate material for fabricating novel 1D-OICSHNSs.13,15 Here, for the first time, the successful synthesis of highly purified 1D-OICSHNSs with a CNC core and akaganeite (β-FeOOH) nanoparticle shell prepared with a facile green chemical surface functionalization and modification process is reported. Although the first fabrication of iron oxide nanoparticles covered cellulose long fibers dates back to about two decades ago and some successful trials have recently been reported,16 some of the processing challenges such as low efficiency and difficulties in the purification and separation of the by-products appear to have hindered the successful preparation of the CNC core based 1D-OICSHNSs.

Due to the lack of the intrinsic magnetic dipoles, cellulose, like most of the other polymers, is known to be a feeble diamagnetic material, which means that cellulose is magnetically actuated only when it is affected by a strong external magnetic field that is often produced by superconducting magnets.17,18 Depending on the type and situation of the structural covalent bonds, the anisotropic diamagnetic susceptibility of the polymeric materials can be positive or negative.18–20 If the anisotropic cellulose diamagnetic susceptibility is negative than the cellulose chains align perpendicular to the direction of the sufficiently strong static magnetic field.14,21,22 Moreover, with decrease in the size of diamagnetic materials from micro to nanoscale, the external magnetic field strength should be increased to overcome the thermal energy and other physical phenomena that may negatively affect the magnetic alignment of the diamagnetic nanoparticles.19,20 Therefore, some researchers have reported external magnetic field strengths up to 20 T for the efficient alignment of the CNCs.23 In addition to the high cost of the consumed energy and supplying and maintaining such facilities that can provide these strong magnetic fields, the harmful effects of such strong magnetic fields on the health of the human and environment are well known.24 By using the method that we report here, fabricating novel 1D-OICSHNSs based on CNCs with a vast variety of different physicochemical properties and potential applications will be possible. Although here we focused on fabricating a cellulose core magnetic shell nano-heterostructure that efficiently responds to considerably weaker modulated external magnetic fields with a positive magnetic susceptibility, the authors believe that the explained method will provide novel concepts for obtaining novel 1D-OICSHNSs that consist of cellulose nanocrystals, and a vast variety of functional metal oxides with unique and outstanding properties that can be used in modern high-tech industries and medicine.

Experimental section

Materials

Whatman CF-11 fibrous cellulose powder (Catalogue no. 4021050) was used as the starting cellulose material for the extraction of cellulose nanocrystals. Hydrobromic acid (HBr), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O > 99%) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30% v/v) were purchased from Nakalai Tesque, Inc. (Kyoto, Japan) and used without further purification.

Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals

Rod-like cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were prepared by the hydrobromic acid hydrolysis of CF-11 cellulose powder. Acid hydrolysis was performed in 3 N HBr for 4 h at 100 °C in a 3-necked round bottom flask fitted with a thermometer, a reflux condenser and a magnetic stirrer. To quench acid hydrolysis, dilution was performed two times and the diluted acidic suspension was then centrifuged by a high speed centrifuge (Tomy Seiko Co. Ltd., model CM-60RN) at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm for 15 min. This step was repeated 3 times and each time the supernatant acidic solution was removed and replaced with distilled water. Subsequently, the white suspension was sonicated for 10 min at 24 kHz using an ultrasonic lab homogenizer UP400S (Hielscher Ultrasonics, GmbH, Germany) to break down agglomerated cellulose microparticles to individual nanoparticles and increase the final yield. The sonicated suspension was then poured into a Fisherbrand dialysis tubing (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Catalog no. 21-152-8) and dialyzed against distilled water for 12 days at room temperature. After neutralization, to separate the CNCs, the suspension was centrifuged again for 15 min at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm. This step was repeated to obtain a turbid supernatant containing individual CNCs. The supernatant was poured into lab glassware and stored at 4 °C until used. Moreover, the precipitated cellulose microcrystals (CMCs) that were obtained in the last step of centrifugation were separately stored to be used later.

Preparation of cellulose-akaganeite hybrid nanocrystals

To prepare cellulose-akaganeite hybrid nanocrystals (CAHNCs), the CNCs were first partially oxidized by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), as one of the known cellulose oxidizing agents. To oxidize CNCs, 100 ml of H2O2 (30% v/v) was added to 50 ml of 0.5% CNC suspension with slight magnetic stirring. The glass container containing the suspension was carefully capped and covered by a piece of parafilm and aluminum foil, respectively, and it was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The oxidized CNC suspension was then centrifuged at 12[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm for 15 minutes to remove the excess H2O2 and refine the oxidized CNCs (OCNCs). The white colored solid residue was re-suspended by adding 100 ml of distilled water, and it was centrifuged once again. After removing the supernatant, the precipitated OCNCs were diluted again to 100 ml. To prevent the undesirable oxidation of Fe2+ ions by excess dissolved oxygen molecules, deoxygenation was carried out by bubbling nitrogen through the suspension for at least 1 h before adding the iron salt. To supply the Fe2+ ions, 1 M ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O) was added to the OCNCs suspension with magnetic stirring and nitrogen gas flow was maintained. Immediately after adding Fe2+ ions, an exothermic reaction occurred and the color of the suspension turned from milky white to orange and the pH of the solution decreased to 1. After 45 min, to neutralize the suspension and remove the extra unreacted Fe2+ ions, the resulting chemically modified CNCs were washed several times by centrifugation at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm for 10 min. The described method was also used to chemically modify the previously prepared CMCs. The explained preparation procedure is illustrated step by step in Scheme 1.
image file: c4ra09468a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Step by step schematic representation of the fabrication process of the CAHNCs.

Magnetic response investigation

To investigate and compare the magnetic responses of the prepared CNCs and the CAHNCs, a cryocooler cooled superconducting magnet (SHI, Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.) was used to generate horizontal static magnetic fields of 1, 2, 4 and 8 T. Several drops of 0.05% solution of the CNCs and CAHNCs were put on glass slides and then the glass slides were placed at the center of the magnet bore and the liquid phase was allowed to evaporate. After the liquid was completely evaporated, the residual solid thin layers were characterized using different techniques.

Characterization

Characterization of the as-obtained hybrid nanocrystal structures was carried out by an X'Pert Pro MPD X-ray diffractometer equipped with a PIXcel detector (PANalytical BV, The Netherlands) at 40 kV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation at a wavelength of λ = 1.5418 Å in the range of 2θ = 10–70°. XRD data were collected by step scanning with a step size of 0.026° 2θ and a scan step time of 78.8 s. The collected data were analyzed using the X'Pert HighScore Plus software package. In addition, to investigate the magnetic alignment of the synthesized hybrid nanoparticles, 2D wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) patterns were recorded using a Rigaku RINT-2000 diffractometer (Rigaku LTD, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA.

Infrared spectroscopy was carried out using a PerkinElmer Frontier spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a universal ATR sampling accessory in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 at a 1 cm−1 resolution.

Magnetization measurements were performed using a Lakeshore Model 7400 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature.

The morphology and alignment of the produced nanocrystalline hybrid structures were determined by a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; S-4800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at low accelerating voltages of 1.5 kV to 5 kV. To avoid the charging effect on the sample surface during the scanning electron microscopy observation, the surfaces of all the samples were sputter coated with platinum (Pt) using an ion-sputtering coater Hitachi E-1045 (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The alignment of CNCs and CAHNCs under modulated external magnetic field was quantitatively assessed using the OrientationJ plugin (Biomedical Image Group, Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne, Switzerland) of ImageJ software (ver. 1.48, US National Institutes of Health, USA) and OriginPro 9.1 (OriginLabs, Northampton, MA, USA).

To observe and compare the quality of the magnetic alignment, polarized light microscopy (PLM) micrographs were obtained using a Nikon Labophot 2-Pol polarizing transmitted light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). To quantify the qualitative results of the PLMs, an innovative method was used. The changes in the values of the contrast intensity of colors red, green, and blue (RGB) for the two deflection angles of +45° and −45° with respect to the external magnetic field direction were assessed using the ImageJ software. A relative color contrast value (RCC) belonging to each sample affected by a specific strength of the external modulated magnetic field was calculated according to the eqn (1) as follows:

 
image file: c4ra09468a-t1.tif(1)
where, CI, i, j, and r represent the color intensity, complementary color, applied magnetic field intensity and reference magnetic field intensity, respectively. Therefore, the relative color contrast value or its abbreviated RCCij/r is defined as a ratio between the differential i color intensity (CI) resulting from changing the deflection angle of 90° between +45° and −45° with respect to the direction of a certain magnetic field intensity (j) and its differential values under a reference magnetic field intensity. The calculated RCC values were used to compare the improvement of the magnetic response of the produced CAHNCs versus the initial CNCs.

Results and discussion

Morphology and structural properties

The morphology, size and microstructure of the CNCs and CAHNCs were examined using a FESEM. Fig. 1a and b show the micrographs of the rod-like CNCs extracted by acid hydrolysis, as described in the experimental section. The average length and diameter of the CNCs were determined to be 175 and 13 nm, respectively, which indicate an aspect ratio of about 13.5. FESEM micrographs obviously show changes on the surface of the CNCs after chemical modification procedures were applied to the starting CNCs converting them into the final CAHNCs (Fig. 1c–e). Spherical nanoparticles with an average diameter of about 8 ± 3 nm can be seen on the surface of the CNCs. Micrograph (Fig. 1e) confirms that the spherical nanoparticles have densely covered the CNCs such that the CNCs are fully encapsulated within the synthesized spherical inorganic nanoparticles. Therefore, these new hybrid crystalline structures are composed of an organic core of CNC covered by an inorganic shell of spherical nanoparticles. Fig. 1f shows the size distribution of the diameters of the starting CNCs and the synthesized CAHNCs. As can be seen, the applied chemical modification procedures increased the average diameter of CNCs by about 13 nm relative to the obtained inorganic shell. Moreover, these micrographs show that no extra and free spherical inorganic nanoparticles can be found among the obtained 1D crystalline heterostructures, and this point is a very important advantage because selectively removing the extra nanoparticles and the purification of the CAHNCs can be a big limiting challenge. Fig. 1g schematically shows the structure of the synthesized 1D CAHNCs.
image file: c4ra09468a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 FESEM micrographs of the extracted CNCs (a and b), the synthetized CAHNCs (c and d), and a part of the surface of a single CAHNC (scale bar is 30 nm) (e). Particle size distribution of the CNCs and CAHNCs (f). Schematic of the core–shell structures of the CAHNCs (g).

Fig. 2 shows the XRD pattern for the produced 1D hybrid nanoparticles. As this figure shows, all the appeared peaks efficiently match with the akaganeite-M (iron oxide chloride hydroxide) with I2/m monoclinic space group and lattice constants a = 10.60 Å, b = 3.035 Å, c = 10.51 Å, α and γ = 90.00°, and β = 90.22° referred to in the JCPDS card no. 42-1315 and no impurity peak can be detected. Moreover, as can be seen, the cellulose peaks at 16.48° and 34.32° overlap with the akaganeite peaks, one at 17.05° and two other very close peaks at 34.41° and 35.22°, making them indiscernible from each other. The Scherrer equation was used to estimate the crystallite size of the synthesized akaganeite nanoparticles and it was revealed that the average size of the spherical akaganeite nanocrystals was about 4–6 nm. Therefore, the FESEM and XRD findings confirmed that the synthesis of the 1D crystalline heterostructure of CAHNCs was successfully carried out.


image file: c4ra09468a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 X-ray diffraction pattern of the synthesized CAHNCs.

To obtain a better understanding of the structural properties of the synthetized CAHNCs, ATR-FTIR was performed. Fig. 3a and b show the ATR-FTIR spectra of CNCs and CAHNCs. As seen, converting the CNCs to the CAHNCs induced some changes in the spectra. The observation of two absorption peaks at around 695 and 847 cm−1, which are attributed to the deformation vibrations of the two O–H⋯Cl hydrogen bands confirm the successful synthesis of the chloride-containing akaganeite nanoparticles.25 In addition, the appearance of two other peaks at around 420 and 474 cm−1 is attributed to the symmetric Fe–O–Fe stretching vibrations.26–28 Moreover, the existence of an OH-stretching broad band with maxima at 3345 cm−1 can also be attributed to the akaganeite structure. The bands at 1630 cm−1 in the CAHNC and CNC spectra correspond to absorbed H2O in the CAHNC and CNC. The band at around 1548 cm−1 in the spectrum of CAHNC, in general, is assigned to the COO– stretching band.29 Thus, all of the obtained data from the FESEM, XRD, and ATR-FTIR strongly confirm the synthesized hetero-nanostructures were composed of an organic rod-like core of cellulose and a mineral shell made up of spherical nanoparticles of the chloride-containing akaganeite.


image file: c4ra09468a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 ATR-FTIR spectra of the CNCs and CAHNCs between (a) 400 cm−1 to 1800 cm−1 and (b) 2450 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1.

Magnetic response and properties

Polarized light microscopy (PLM) images obviously indicate the different magnetic behaviors of the starting CNCs and the produced CAHNCs after being subjected to magnetic fields upon drying (Fig. 4a–d). The CMCs and CAHMCs (10 percent w/w) were also added to the suspensions of CNCs and CAHNCs, respectively, to be used as microscale models. In these figures, changes in the color of the images are related to changes in orientation of the nano and micro particle films against the polarized light. Fig. 4a shows that CMCs are inherently turned and aligned perpendicular to the applied external magnetic field of 8 T; however, this magnetic intensity is not sufficiently strong to significantly affect the starting diamagnetic CNCs and align them perpendicular to the applied external magnetic field direction. Therefore, because of the random orientation of the CNCs against CMCs, the background color of the images in Fig. 4aL and R are exactly the same. As mentioned elsewhere by the authors, during the evaporation of the liquid phase of the CNC suspension, in particular if the CNCs are suspended in a polar liquid phase such as water, some disrupting physicochemical phenomena may play a role in preventing the magnetic alignment of the CNCs; interfacial interactions and surface tension forces are some of the most important preventing phenomena to be mentioned. Based on the PLM images shown here, the applied magnetic field intensity should be increased to values considerably higher than 8 T to successfully align the diamagnetic CNCs. Moreover, PLM micrographs indicate that both the CAHMCs and CAHNCs were successfully aligned parallel to the magnetic field direction even under a magnetic field intensity of 2 T, in contrast with the inherent diamagnetic behavior of cellulose (Fig. 4b and c). An investigation on the obtained PLM micrographs of the samples that are prepared in a magnetic field intensity of 1 T revealed that although this magnetic field intensity was not enough to efficiently align the CAHNCs and CAHMCs, the color distribution of images was different from those for the CNCs and CMCs. It appears that under the magnetic field intensity of 1 T, some localized partial magnetic field induced self-assembly occurred, but the mentioned preventing forces partially disturbed the alignment quality.
image file: c4ra09468a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 PLM observations of the prepared films of the CNCs and CMCs under a static magnetic field of 8 T (aL and aR), the CAHNCs and CAHMCs under a static magnetic fields of 4 T (bL and bR), 2 T (cL and cR), and 1 T (dL and dR) (the curved black arrows indexed by R indicate rotation angles from −45° to +45°). (e) The curve of RCC factor vs. the applied magnetic field intensity as a quantitative comparative criterion of the quality of the magnetic field induced self-assembly and orientation. (f) The magnetic hysteresis loop for the synthesized CAHNCs at RT.

The other interesting phenomenon that can be seen in the captured PLM micrographs is the formation of some long and short well-ordered microstructures made up of linear magnetically assembled CAHMCs (Fig. 4b and c). These linearly assembled microstructures are efficiently aligned parallel to the external magnetic field direction. As PLM images show, with decreasing the applied magnetic field intensity, the length and frequency of these linearly assembled microstructures decrease. These microstructures cannot be found in the case of prepared films from the diamagnetic CMCs and CNCs even by applying a magnetic field intensity of 8 T (Fig. 4a). Finally, by an innovative method, as mentioned in the experimental section, the differences of the color contrast of the obtained PLM images were converted into quantitative values that are indexed as RCC factors. Fig. 4e shows the relationship between the RCC factor and the applied magnetic field intensity. As seen, by increasing the magnetic field intensity from 1 T to 4 T, the RCC factor increases more than 7 times, but from 4 T to 8 T, the RCC factor shows no change. Thus, the magnetic field intensity of 4 T is probably considerably adequate to achieve efficiently aligned CAHNCs. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the estimated RCC factors of the prepared samples of diamagnetic CMCs and CNCs under 8 T and CAHMCs and CAHNCs under 1 T modulated magnetic field intensity.

To investigate the magnetic properties of the synthesized hybrid micro and nanoparticles, the magnetization of the samples was examined by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). As Fig. 4f shows, no hysteresis loop, coercivity, and retentivity were observed, which indicate the superparamagnetic behavior of the synthesized akaganeite nanoparticles and of course the fabricated hybrid nano and microcrystals.

Fig. 5a and b show the FESEM micrographs of the unidirectionally aligned linearly self-assembled CAHMCs parallel to the applied external magnetic field of 4 T. Higher magnifications revealed that the present long linear configurations were composed of some linearly assembled shorter CAHMCs (Fig. 5b). Fig. 5c schematically explains the probable causes of these well-aligned linear aggregations. It appears that the main reason is magnetic attraction among the CAHMCs, which act like 1D dipole micromagnets due to a covering of the superparamagnetic spherical akaganeite nanoparticles. In a sufficiently strong external magnetic field, here 4 T, the spherical akaganeite nanoparticles act to be single-domain magnetic nanoparticles due to their superparamagnetic properties. The orientation of the magnetic domain in each akaganeite nanoparticle is the same as the other, parallel to the external magnetic field direction. Therefore, each CAHMC can be envisioned to be a 1D dipole micromagnet whose magnetic poles attract the opposite poles of the neighboring CAHMC making the linear structures orient themselves in the direction of the applied external magnetic field.


image file: c4ra09468a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 FESEM images of unidirectionally linear magnetic self-assembled CAHMCs under a magnetic field intensity of 4 T at different magnifications of (a) ×150 and (b) ×800. (c) Schematic illustration of the magnetically self-assembled CAHMCs.

By comparing the obtained data from PLM and FESEM micrographs, it was found that the magnetic field intensity of 4 T was probably the optimal condition offering the highest level of alignment and orientation in this research. Fig. 6a and b show the PLM micrographs of the CAHNCs and CNCs, respectively, which are prepared from films obtained in the magnetic field of 4 T. These figures clearly indicate the successful unidirectional alignment of the CAHNCs and the unsuccessful alignment of the diamagnetic CNCs by applying the external magnetic field of 4 T. FESEM micrographs strongly confirmed the PLM observations (Fig. 6c and d).


image file: c4ra09468a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Results obtained from the characterization of the thin films of CAHNCs (left-handed images) and CNCs (right-handed images) performed under a magnetic field of 4 T by PLM (a and b), FESEM (c and d), 2D WAXD (e and f), and polar scatter plots of the orientation distribution of the CAHNCs (g) and CNCs (h) (vertical and angular axes, respectively show frequency and angle of the alignment).

2D X-ray diffraction imaging was performed to further confirm the obtained data from the FESM and PLM. Fig. 6e clearly shows that in the case of CAHNCs prepared under the magnetic field intensity of 4 T, the long axes of the hybrid nanocrystals are efficiently aligned parallel to the magnetic field direction. On the contrary, for the diamagnetic CNCs, the appearance of the complete rings indicates the random alignment of the CNCs independent of the direction of applied magnetic field (Fig. 6f). Finally, to quantify the obtained data, image analysis was performed on the FESEM micrographs and the results can be seen in Fig. 6g and h for the CAHNCs and CNCs, respectively. These polar scatter plots obviously indicate the high orientation of the CAHNCs parallel to the magnetic field of 4 T, in contrast to the random distribution of alignment in the case of the CNCs.

Conclusions

To conclude, we have reported the first successful in situ synthesis of 1D cellulose akaganeite hybrid nanocrystals (CAHNCs), which offers considerably higher magnetic response compared with the starting diamagnetic cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). The reported fabrication process led to the direct conversion of the diamagnetic cellulose nanocrystals to the superparamagnetic CAHNCs composed of a core of crystalline cellulose and a shell of spherical akaganeite nanoparticles with the average particle size of 4 to 6 nm. An important advantage of using this method is the elimination of the challenge of the formation of extra magnetic nanoparticles and their separation. The CAHNCs were well aligned even in an external magnetic field of 2 T, whereas the starting diamagnetic CNCs showed no alignment even under an 8 T magnetic field intensity. In addition, due to the akaganeite coverage, the easy axis of magnetization of the starting CNCs was changed from perpendicular to parallel of the magnetic field direction. The organic–inorganic core shell structure, superparamagnetic behavior and relatively higher magnetic response make the CAHNCs good candidates for high potential hybrid nanoparticles, which can be used in applications, where a hybrid structure at the nanoscale, which simultaneously offers a good magnetic response, biodegradability and renewability are important.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Mr Mitsuhiko Morimoto and his colleagues of PerkinElmer Japan Co., Ltd. Osaka Branch Office for the use of PerkinElmer Frontier spectrophotometer. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University and the International Scientific Cooperation Office, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.

Notes and references

  1. Y. Xia, P. Yang, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, B. Mayers, B. Gates, Y. Yin, F. Kim and H. Yan, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 353 CrossRef CAS.
  2. F. Kayaci, C. Ozgit-Akgun, I. Donmez, N. Biyikli and T. Uyar, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 6185 CAS.
  3. M. Macias-Montero, A. N. Filippin, Z. Saghi, F. J. Aparicio, A. Barranco, J. P. Espinos, F. Frutos, A. R. Gonzalez-Elipe and A. Borras, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23, 5981 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Z. Sun, E. Zussman, A. L. Yarin, J. H. Wendorff and A. Greiner, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 1929 CrossRef CAS.
  5. D. Zhang, L. Luo, Q. Liao, H. Wang, H. Fu and J. Yao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 115, 2360 Search PubMed.
  6. J. Kong, H. R. Tan, S. Y. Tan, F. Li, S. Y. Wong, X. Li and X. Lu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8773 RSC.
  7. M. Agrawal, A. Pich, S. Gupta, N. E. Zafeiropoulos, P. Simon and M. Stamm, Langmuir, 2008, 24, 1013 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. X. Cui, S. Zhong and H. Wang, Polymer, 2007, 48, 7241 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. H. Strohm and P. Löbmann, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 6772 CrossRef CAS.
  10. Z. Liang, A. Susha and F. Caruso, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 3176 CrossRef CAS.
  11. L. A. Fielding and S. P. Armes, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 11235 RSC.
  12. K. Uetani and H. Yano, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 3396 RSC.
  13. Y. Habibi, L. A. Lucia and O. J. Rojas, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3479 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. P. Lagerwall, C. Schütz, M. Salajkova, J. Noh, J. H. Park, G. Scalia and L. Bergström, NPG Asia Mater., 2014, 6, e80,  DOI:10.1038/am.2013.69.
  15. L. Rueda, A. Saralegi, B. Fernández-d'Arlas, Q. Zhou, A. Alonso-Varona, L. A. Berglund, I. Mondragon, M. Corcuera and A. Eceiza, Cellulose, 2013, 20, 1819 CrossRef CAS.
  16. R. Marchessault, P. Rioux and L. Raymond, Polymer, 1992, 33, 4024 CrossRef CAS.
  17. M. Mashkour, T. Kimura, F. Kimura, M. Mashkour and M. Tajvidi, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15, 60 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. J. Sugiyama, H. Chanzy and G. Maret, Macromolecules, 1992, 25, 4232 CrossRef CAS.
  19. T. Kimura, Polym. J., 2003, 35, 823 CrossRef CAS.
  20. T. Kimura, H. Ago, M. Tobita, S. Ohshima, M. Kyotani and M. Yumura, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 1380 CrossRef CAS.
  21. F. Kimura and T. Kimura, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2008, 9, 024212 CrossRef.
  22. F. Kimura, T. Kimura, M. Tamura, A. Hirai, M. Ikuno and F. Horii, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 2034 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. S. T. Sundar, M. M. Sain and K. Oksman, Carbohydr. Polym., 2010, 80, 35 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. M. Mashkour, M. Tajvidi, T. Kimura, F. Kimura and G. Ebrahimi, BioResources, 2011, 6, 4731 CAS.
  25. Z.-Y. Yuan and B.-L. Su, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 381, 710–714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. H. Xiong, Y. Liao, L. Zhou, Y. Xu and S. Wang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2008, 42, 4165 CrossRef CAS.
  27. H. Fan, B. Song, Z. Yang and Q. Li, Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 576–577 CrossRef CAS.
  28. E. Murad and J. L. Bishop, Am. Mineral., 2000, 85, 716 CAS.
  29. S. Musić, S. Krehula and S. Popović, Mater. Lett., 2004, 58, 444 CrossRef.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.