N-Alkylamido-D-glucamine-based gelators for the generation of thixotropic gels

Yutaka Ohsedo*a, Masashi Oonob, Kowichiro Saruhashib and Hisayuki Watanabeab
aAdvanced Materials Research Laboratory, Collaborative Research Division, Art, Science and Technology Center for Cooperative Research, Kyushu University 4-1 Kyudaishinmachi, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0388, Japan. E-mail: ohsedo@astec.kyushu-u.ac.jp; Fax: +81-92-400-4382; Tel: +81-92-400-4381
bNissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., 2-10-1 Tsuboinishi, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8507, Japan

Received 8th August 2014 , Accepted 25th September 2014

First published on 25th September 2014


Abstract

Hydrogels made from new gelators, composed of the alkyl chain and a D-glucamine moiety linked together with glycine(s), exhibit thixotropic properties, whereas the hydrogels formed with structurally similar N-alkyl-D-glucamide, which do not contain the glycine moiety, have a tendency to crystallize and do not show thixotropic behaviour.


Molecular hydrogels made from low-molecular-weight gelators (LMWGs) have attracted attention as new soft matter that feature well-defined chemical structures (comparable to that of polymer gelators) and for their tendency to directly reflect the chemical modification in gelators.1,2 While the detailed description of the global properties of the gels are under study, the physical aspects of molecular gels related to the gelation process and the network inside the gels are not fully elucidated. Gels formed with carefully designed LMWGs have found medicinal3 and optoelectronic4 applications, and continue to attract researchers in soft matter due to their potential in human life and society. Stimuli-responsive5 and thixotropic6 molecular gels have been investigated with an objective to improve the mechanical properties of molecular gels and investigate the relationship between these properties and molecular network in the gel. In particular, thixotropy—mechanically reversible sol-to-gel transitions7—of a gel has a potential for utility in industrial applications, such as an additive in healthcare formulations.

N-Alkylaldonamides (especially n-octyl- and n-dodecyl-D-glucamides), structurally simple molecules composed of a polar moiety and an alkyl group, form fibres through an elaborate network of hydrogen bonds and result in hydrogelation.8 Several derivatives of N-alkylaldonamides exhibit unique nano- and micro-metre scale architectures,9–12 however, effective gelation of solvents using the original N-alkylaldonamides requires the inclusion of a small amount of a surfactant.10

The formation of molecular gels with new properties can be achieved by newer methods. For example, it has been shown that mixing two homologs of N-alkyl-D-glucamides induces thixotropy in the two-component gel.13 Similar mixing induced thixotropy is observed in other organogelators and hydrogelators.14 Although development of such post-synthesis methods for generating functional molecular gels is important,15,16 it is necessary to design and synthesize (using simple protocols) novel gelators for promoting the study of gels.

In this report, we describe the creation of new thixotropic hydrogelators (PG-G, PG2-G and SG-G) (Scheme 1) by ‘inserting’ amino acid residue(s) in N-alkylamide-D-glucamines. These molecular gelators, where glycine serves as the linker between polar D-glucamine and hydrophobic alkyl chain, are synthesized by a simple protocol under mild reaction conditions. The amide bonds covalently linking the three moieties in the molecule provide relatively better chemical stability than that of their ester counterparts. The effect of the chemical modification (from N-alkylamide-D-glucamine to PG-G, PG2-G and SG-G by introducing the amino acid) on the hydrogelation and the properties of the resulting hydrogel are also evaluated. In a related study, new alkyl ester-D-glucamide type gelators that can gelate various aqueous and organic liquids are evaluated.


image file: c4ra08346f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Chemical structures of alkyl-D-glucamine derivatives.

PG-G, SG-G and PG2-G are synthesized by condensation of N-glucamine with the appropriate alkyloylamino acid, which in turn is obtained from a reaction between the appropriate alkyloylchloride and glycine in an aqueous NaOH solution (see ESI).17 The reaction temperature for both the steps of the synthesis is mild. After the completion of the reaction, purification in both reactions simply involves evaporation of the solvent in vacuo and recrystallization in the appropriate solvent; no tedious purification by column chromatography is involved. Elemental analysis confirms the purity of the compounds (see ESI).

The gelation ability of new N-alkylaldonamides are examined in various aqueous solutions to obtain critical gelation concentration (CGC) (Table 1, see photographs of hydrogels in Fig. S1, ESI). PG-G, PG2-G and SG-G form hydrogels in solutions with a wide range of pH values (2–10) and even in the presence of high NaCl concentration (1 M). While these gelators exhibit moderate CGC values, the hydrogels formed retain their state for over three months. N-Alkyl-D-aldonamides, lacking the inserted glycine moiety, show poor gel stability in the absence of the additive, sodium dodecyl sulfate. It is likely, then, that the better gel stability observed in case of these glycine-containing LMWGs is due to the generation of amino acid-mediated hydrogen bonding networks in these hydrogels. Except in the case of unbuffered deionized water, hydrogelation ability of PG2-G, which has a two-glycine-linker, is superior to that of PG-G, which has a one-glycine-linker. In addition, the longer-alkyl chain containing hydrogelator, SG-G, exhibits an overall inferior gelation property than that of PG-G. These results indicate that PG-G and PG2-G show moderate gel forming properties in various aqueous solutions, even in the existence of salt.

Table 1 Critical gelation concentrations (CGCs) of new hydrogelators
Solvent PG-G PG2-G SG-G
a pH = 1.68.b pH = 6.86.c pH = 10.11.d Turbid gel.e Clear gel.f Partial gel.g Crystal from 5.0 wt% solution.
Deionized water 0.5d 3.0d 3.0e
Oxalate buffera 2.0d 2.0d 5.0f
Phosphate bufferb 2.0d 1.0d 5.0f
Carbonate bufferc 2.0d 2.0d 5.0f
aq. NaCl (1 M) g 2.0d g


Rheometric measurements of the molecular hydrogels confirm the existence of gel state (Fig. 1), as seen in the case of polymer gels.18 With increasing stress, the magnitudes of the storage modulus, G′ and the loss modulus, G′′, show the transition of the gel state (G′ > G′′) to the sol state (G′ < G′′). In the frequency sweep, gelation is evidenced by the pseudo plateau, where the magnitude of G′ is greater than that of G′′. Furthermore, among the three gels, the highest magnitudes of moduli and stability are observed for hydrogels formed with PG2-G, indicating that a relatively stiff hydrogel is obtained by introducing the glycine repeat moiety.


image file: c4ra08346f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Dynamic rheological properties of PG-G (1 wt%), PG2-G (3 wt%) and SG-G (3 wt%) hydrogels; (a) strain sweep and (b) frequency sweep.

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements show that similar ΔH values accompany the sol-to-gel and corresponding gel-to-sol transitions (Fig. S1 and Table S1, ESI), suggesting the reversibility of these transitions. The presence of longer alkyl chains (comparing hydrogels formed with PG-G and SG-G) or the incorporation of a higher number of glycines (comparing hydrogels formed with PG-G and PG2-G) causes the transitions to take place at higher temperatures; this shift is attributed to the increased interaction between alkyl chains and hydrogen bonding in SG-G and PG2-G, respectively.

Hydrogels formed with PG-G, PG2-G and SG-G show thixotropic behaviour even when used at concentrations close to CGC (only hydrogels of PG-G showed thixotropic behaviour at >1.0 wt%). Shaken hydrogels regelated to form stable hydrogels, as shown in Fig. 2 for solutions of PG-G and PG2-G. Rheometric evaluations of the thixotropic behaviour of hydrogels by step experiment (Fig. 3) show that the magnitude of the recovered G′ is greater than G′′ after several repeated applications of the deformation shear. The reduction in the magnitude of G′ and G′′ after each recovery suggests that the network in the hydrogel network is changed (partially destroyed) after each application of deformation shear; however, this change is insufficient to completely breakdown the hydrogels. However, cumulative effect of the applied deformation shear ultimately destroys the hydrogels, and also its ability to recover and rebuild its damaged networks. Relatively more stable plots of modulus are obtained in case of PG2-G than the other gelators (Fig. 3). This is attributed to the presence of more sites capable of forming hydrogen bonds (from the two glycines), which can facilitate the rebuilding of the fibrous network in gels. The role of hydrogen bonds of gelators as the driving force of fibre formation was shown by the results of infrared spectra of different states of gelator systems (Fig. S3). To obtain more information about thixotropic behaviour, we conducted the thixotropic hysteresis loop test7,19 of our hydrogels (Fig. S4). This test showed that the responses of hydrogels to the repeated applied shear were observed as the peaks of loops and the extent of the response (shear stress) decayed with increasing maximum of shear rate (in SG-G, the peak shift was observed probably due to better durability against continuous shear rate change). In addition, the order of the extent of responses corresponded to that of step experiment above (PG2-GSG-G > PG-G). These results mean that the extent of breaking gels (the extent of decay of response) depends on shear rate and these results coincide with the results of step experiment.


image file: c4ra08346f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Thixotropic tests of hydrogels: (a–c) PG-G (1 wt%) hydrogel and (d–f) PG2-G (3 wt%) hydrogel.

image file: c4ra08346f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Periodic step-shear test results for PG-G (1.0 wt%), PG2-G (3.0 wt%) and SG-G (3.0 wt%) hydrogels.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of xerogels, which are prepared by freeze-drying corresponding hydrogels at CGC, show a network structure largely composed of sub-micrometre thick fibres (Fig. 4). Considering that some aggregation occurs during the preparation of the xerogels (during freeze-drying), it is likely that the hydrogels are composed of a network structure made with finer fibres than that observed in xerogels. These networks in molecular hydrogels resemble polymer-like networks and possess thixotropic properties.


image file: c4ra08346f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 SEM images of xerogels prepared from the corresponding hydrogels: (a and b) PG-G (0.5 wt%); (c and d) PG2-G (3 wt%) and (e and f) SG-G (3 wt%).

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses reveal that the peak positions of the hydrogels (Fig. 5) are different from those of the corresponding xerogel sample, and larger than the contour length of the corresponding length of the gelators (optimized by MM2 calculations, Fig. S5, ESI) except for PG2-G (for PG2-G, peak positions can be compared between hydrogel and xerogel). It has been shown previously7 that N-alkyl-D-aldonamides molecules form fibre, micelle and lamellar structures based on the bilayer structures of molecules. Considering the contour length of the gelators in the gel state (the XRD results for PG-G and SG-G showed smaller length than the two contour length of gelators), it is likely that the gelators form interdigitated lamellar based on bilayer structures in fibre (Fig. S6, ESI) for PG-G and SG-G (for PG2-G, the gelator might form a bilayer structure in fibre). In the xerogel state, it might be probable that the gelator molecules form bilayer structures and the XRD reflection occurs from a periodic structure corresponding length of two gelators.


image file: c4ra08346f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 XRD data of hydrogels and crystals of PG-G, PG2-G and SG-G.

In conclusion, we have created new family of D-glucamine- and alkyl-chain-based hydrogelators by introducing a glycine-linker to connect the two moieties. The tripartite hydrogelators, synthesized under mild reaction conditions, form stable hydrogels with solutions of different pH values. These hydrogels show thixotropic properties, whereas the hydrogel formed with the hydrogelator devoid of the glycine linker, i.e. N-alkyl-D-glucamide, does not show such behaviour. These results suggest that that the property of a molecular gel can be changed by chemically tuning the gelator molecules, e.g. by introducing a glycine moiety in them. In summary, we have synthesized new hydrogelators that impart thixotropic properties to the gel.

Notes and references

  1. For books: (a) Molecular Gels: Materials With Self-Assembled Fibrillar Networks, ed. R. G. Weiss and P. Terech, Kluwer Academic Pub, 2006 Search PubMed; (b) Low Molecular Mass Gelators Design, Self-Assembly, Function (Top. Curr. Chem.), ed. F. Fages, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, p. 256 Search PubMed.
  2. For recent reviews: (a) A. Dawn, T. Shiraki, S. Haraguchi, S.-I. Tamaru and S. Shinkai, Chem.–Asian J., 2011, 6, 266 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) J. W. Steed, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1379 RSC; (c) X.-Y. Yang, G.-X. Zhang and D.-Q. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 38 RSC; (d) A. J. Jonker, D. W. P. M. Löwik and J. C. M. Van Hest, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 759 CrossRef CAS; (e) M. Yamanaka, J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem., 2013, 77, 33 CrossRef CAS; (f) M. D. Segarra-Maset, V. J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet and B. Escuder, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 7086 RSC; (g) X. Yu, L. Chen, M. Zhang and T. Yi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 5346 RSC; (h) R. G. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 7519 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) M. Cametti and Z. Džolić, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8273 RSC.
  3. (a) A. R. Hirst, B. Escuder, J. F. Miravet and D. K. Smith, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8002 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) F. Zhao, M. L. Ma and B. Xu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 883 RSC; (c) J. B. Matson and S. I. Stupp, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 26 RSC.
  4. (a) S. S. Babu, S. Prasanthkumar and A. Ajayaghosh, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1766 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. S. Babu, V. K. Praveen and A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1973 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. For recent examples of stimuli-responsive LMWG gels: (a) A. Dawn, T. Shiraki, H. Ichikawa, A. Takada, Y. Tahakashi, Y. Tsuchiya, L. T. N. Lien and S. Shinkai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 2161 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S.-Y. Dong, B. Zheng, D.-H. Xu, X.-H. Yan, M.-M. Zhang and F.-H. Huang, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 3191 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Z.-X. Liu, Y. Feng, Z.-C. Yan, Y.-M. He, C.-Y. Liu and Q.-H. Fan, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 3751 CrossRef CAS; (d) X.-Z. Yan, D.-H. Xu, X.-D. Chi, J.-Z. Chen, S.-Y. Dong, X. Ding, Y.-H. Yu and F.-H. Huang, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 362 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. K. Samanta and S. Bhattacharya, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 25277 RSC; (f) P.-C. Xue, J.-B. Sun, Q.-X. Xu, R. Lu, M. Takafuji and H. Ihara, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 1840 RSC; (g) R. Ochi, K. Kurotani, M. Ikeda, S. Kiyonaka and I. Hamachi, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2115 RSC; (h) Y. Ohsedo, M. Miyamoto, A. Tanaka and H. Watanabe, New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 2874 RSC; (i) Y. Jiang, F. Zeng, R.-Y. Gong, Z.-X. Guo, C.-F. Chen and X.-B. Wan, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 7538 RSC; (j) J. T. van Herpt, M. C. A. Stuart, W. R. Browne and B. L. Feringa, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 8763 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) P. Fatás, J. Bachl, S. Oehm, A. I. Jiménez, C. Cativiela and D. D. Díaz, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 8861 CrossRef PubMed; (l) M. Ikeda, T. Tanida, T. Yoshii, K. Kurotani, S. Onogi, K. Urayama and I. Hamachi, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 511 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) R. Yang, S. Peng and T. C. Hughes, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 2188 RSC; (n) S. Basak, J. Nanda and A. Banerjee, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 3004 RSC.
  6. For recent examples of thixotropic LMWG gels: (a) A. A. Sobczuk, Y. Tsuchiya, T. Shiraki, S.-I. Tamaru and S. Shinkai, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 2832 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) X.-Q. Cai, K.-Q. Liu, J.-L. Yan, H.-L. Zhang, X.-Y. Hou, Z. Liu and Y. Fang, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 3756 RSC; (c) Y. Q. Liu, T. Y. Wang and M. H. Liu, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 14650 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) N. Yan, Z.-Y. Xu, K. K. Diehn, S. R. Raghavan, Y. Fang and R. G. Weiss, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 793 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) Z.-Y. Xu, J.-X. Peng, N. Yan, H. Yu, S.-S. Zhang, K.-Q. Liu and Y. Fang, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 1091 RSC; (f) D. Higashi, M. Yoshida and M. Yamanaka, Chem.–Asian J., 2013, 8, 2548 CrossRef PubMed; (g) X.-D. Yu, X.-H. Cao, L.-M. Chen, H.-C. Lan, B. Liu and T. Yi, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 3329 RSC; (h) J. Nanda, A. Biswas and A. Banerjee, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 4198 RSC; (i) Y. Jiang, F. Zeng, R.-Y. Gong, Z.-X. Guo, C.-F. Chen and X.-B. Wan, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 7538 RSC; (j) J. F. Toro-Vanzquez, J. Morales-Rueda, A. Torres-Martinez, M. A. Charo-Alonso, V. A. Mallia and R. G. Weiss, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 7642 CrossRef PubMed; (k) Z.-F. Sun, Z.-Y. Li, Y.-H. He, R.-J. Shen, L. Deng, M.-H. Yang, Y.-Z. Liang and Y. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 13379 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (l) H. Hoshizawa, Y. Minemura, K. Yoshikawa, M. Suzuki and K. Hanabusa, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 14666 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) W.-W. Fang, Z.-M. Sun and T. Tu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 25185 CrossRef CAS.
  7. (a) J. W. Goodwin and R. W. Hughes, Rheology for Chemists: An Introduction, RSC Publishing, 2nd edn, 2008 Search PubMed; (b) J. Mewis, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 1979, 6, 1 CrossRef CAS; (c) H. A. Barnes, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 1997, 70, 1 CrossRef CAS; (d) J. Mewis and N. J. Wagner, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2009, 147–148, 214 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. (a) J.-H. Fuhrhop, P. Schnieder, J. Rosenberg and E. Boekema, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 3387 CrossRef CAS; (b) J.-H. Fuhrhop, P. Schnieder, E. Boekema and W. Helfrich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 2861 CrossRef CAS; (c) J.-H. Fuhrhop and C. Boettcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 1768 CrossRef CAS; (d) J.-H. Fuhrhop, S. Svenson, C. Boettcher, E. Rössler and H.-M. Vieth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 4307 CrossRef CAS.
  9. T. Shimizu, M. Masuda and H. Minamikawa, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 1401 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. L. E. Buerkle, R. Galleguillos and S. J. Rowan, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 6984 RSC.
  11. S.-T. Sun and P.-Y. Wu, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 6451 RSC.
  12. C. J. Capicciotti, M. Leclère, F. A. Perras, D. L. Bryce, H. Paulin, J. Harden, Y. Liu and R. N. Ben, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 1408 RSC.
  13. Y. Ohsedo, M. Oono, K. Saruhashi and H. Watanabe, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 43560 RSC.
  14. (a) Y. Ohsedo, M. Miyamoto, H. Watanabe, M. Oono and A. Tanaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2013, 86, 671 CrossRef CAS; (b) Y. Ohsedo, H. Watanabe, M. Oono and A. Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 2013, 42, 363 CrossRef CAS; (c) Y. Ohsedo, H. Watanabe, M. Oono and A. Tanaka, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 5903 RSC; (d) Y. Ohsedo, M. Oono, A. Tanaka and H. Watanabe, New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 2250 RSC; (e) Y. Ohsedo, M. Taniguchi, M. Oono, K. Saruhashi and H. Watanabe, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 35484 RSC; (f) Y. Ohsedo, M. Oono, K. Saruhashi, H. Watanabe and N. Miyamoto, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 44837 RSC; (g) Y. Ohsedo, M. Taniguchi, M. Oono, K. Saruhashi and H. Watanabe, to be published.
  15. For reviews of multi-component LMWG gels: (a) A. R. Hirst and D. K. Smith, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11, 5496 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C. A. Dreiss, Soft Matter, 2007, 3, 956 RSC; (c) L. E. Buerkle and S. J. Rowan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 6089 RSC.
  16. For recent examples of multi-component LMWG gels: (a) L. Meazza, J. A. Foster, K. Fucke, P. Metrangolo, G. Resnati and J. W. Steed, Nat. Chem., 2013, 5, 42 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) B. Roy, P. Bairi, P. Chakraborty and A. K. Nandi, Supramol. Chem., 2013, 25, 335 CrossRef CAS; (c) P.-C. Xue, R. Lu, R. Zhang, J.-H. Jia, Q.-X. Xu, T.-R. Zhang, M. Takafuji and H. Ihara, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 417 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) F. O. Akong, A. Pasc, M. Emo and C. Gérardin-Charbonnier, New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 559 RSC; (e) M. M. Smith, W. Edwards and D. K. Smith, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 671 RSC; (f) S. K. Samanta and S. Bhattacharya, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1425 RSC; (g) B. P. Krishnan, S. Ramakrishnan and K. M. Sureshan, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1494 RSC; (h) R. Rajamalli, S. Atta, S. Maity and E. Prasad, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1744 RSC; (i) K.-Q. Fan, L.-B. Niu, J.-J. Li, R.-X. Feng, R. Qu, T.-Q. Liu and J. Song, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 3057 RSC; (j) H. Kar, M. R. Molla and S. Ghosh, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4220 RSC; (k) P. Bairi, B. Roy, P. Chakraborty and A. K. Nandi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 5478 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (l) W. Edwards and D. K. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5911 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) A. J. Kleinsmann and B. J. Nachtsheim, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7818 RSC; (n) K.-Q. Liu and J. W. Steed, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 11699 RSC; (o) S. Bhattacharjee, S. Datta and S. Bhattacharya, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 16672 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (p) P.-C. Xue, Q.-X. Xu, P. Gong, C. Qian, Z.-Q. Zhang, J.-H. Jia, X. Zhao, R. Lu, A.-M. Ren and T.-R. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 26403 RSC; (q) J. A. Foster, R. M. Edkins, G. J. Cameron, N. Colgin, K. Fucke, S. Ridgeway, A. G. Crawford, T. B. Marder, A. Beeby, S. L. Cobb and J. W. Steed, Chem.–Eur. J., 2014, 20, 279 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (r) H. Kar and S. Ghosh, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1064 RSC; (s) J. Raeburn, B. Alston, J. Kroeger, T. O. McDonald, J. R. Howse, P. J. Cameron and D. J. Adams, Mater. Horiz., 2014, 1, 241 RSC; (t) W. Edwards and D. K. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 116 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. Synthesis of alkyloylamino acid: Y. M. Osornio, P. Uebelhart, S. Bosshard, F. Konrad, J. S. Siegel and E. M. Landau, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 10583 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. G. M. Kavanagh and S. B. Ross-Murphy, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1998, 23, 533 CrossRef CAS.
  19. M. U. Chhatbar, K. Prasad, D. R. Chejara and A. K. Siddhanta, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 1837 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra08346f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.