Facile synthesis of hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres composed of nanosheets and their application for supercapacitors

Lifang Lianab, Jie Yangab, Peixun Xiongab, Weifeng Zhangab and Mingdeng Wei*ab
aState Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China. E-mail: wei-mingdeng@fzu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-591-83753180; Tel: +86-591-83753180
bInstitute of Advanced Energy Materials, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China

Received 31st July 2014 , Accepted 26th August 2014

First published on 26th August 2014


Abstract

Hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres were fabricated by using a simple, green and efficient low-temperature route. These sub-microspheres were formed via the aggregation of ultrathin nanosheets with a thickness of 2–4 nm. An electrode made of hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres exhibited a specific capacitance of 120 F g−1 at a current density of 0.167 A g−1. For an asymmetric AC//MnO2 supercapacitor, it exhibited a superior electrochemical stability in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution with 88% retention of the initial specific capacitance after 1000 cycles, and the Coulombic efficiency was above 97%, indicating good charge–discharge reversibility and electrochemical stability.


Introduction

Supercapacitors, due to their high power density, fast charge–discharge ability and long cycling life, have been considered as complementary to batteries, or even could replace batteries in applications where high power delivery is needed.1–4 Supercapacitors could be classified into two categories. One is the electrical double layer capacitors that store charge electrostatically using reversible absorption of electrolyte ions onto active materials; the other is the pseudocapacitors that depend on the reversible redox reaction at the surface of active materials.3,5 To date, the most widely used electrode materials in supercapacitors are carbonaceous materials (such as carbon nanotube,6 carbon nanofiber7 and grapheme8 etc.), metal oxides (such as RuO2,9 V2O5 (ref. 10) and MnO2 (ref. 15–19) etc.), and conducting polymers.11 Among them, manganese oxides, characterized by high theoretical specific capacitance, nontoxicity, abundance, low-cost and environmental compatibility, have attracted much attention as a promising candidate for supercapacitor.2,12

Nanostructurization is one of major strategies in the development of high-performance manganese oxide-based electrodes for supercapacitor.13 It is well known that the nanomaterials synthesized with controlled sizes, shapes, crystal phases, dimensions and compositions make it possible to tune material parameters for optimizing performance in supercapacitor. Moreover, nanoscale dimension may tolerate more distortion and strain caused by the intercalation/deintercalation of the ions, leading to long-term stability.14 Therefore, many efforts have been devoted into the synthesis of MnO2 with different morphologies, sizes, nanostructures and properties through various methods, such as hydrothermal reaction,15 sol–gel method,16 template method,17 electro-deposition method,18 precipitation method,19 etc. In general, these methods usually need some rigorous reaction conditions including high temperature, high pressure, long reaction time, complex and costly procedures, which are not versatile or environmental friendly. Therefore, the development of a facile and green route for synthesizing MnO2 is still of great significance.

In the present work, a simple and efficient reduction route was successfully developed for fabricating hierarchical sub-microspheres of MnO2 on a large scale. Furthermore, hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres were used as an electrode for supercapacitor and exhibited a good electrochemical performance.

Experimental

Hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres were synthesized via a facile reduction route. In a typical synthesis, 1.0 g of SDBS and 0.632 g of KMnO4 were added to 50 mL of 0.2 M sulfuric acid solution with stirring, and then was kept at 50 °C for 4 h in a water bath. Finally, the precipitate was filtered and washed several times with deionized water and then dried at 70 °C for 12 h.

XRD patterns were recorded on PANalytical X'Pert spectrometer using the Co-Kα radiation and the data were changed to Cu-Kα data. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements (ESCALAB 250) were performed to analyze the surface species and their chemical states. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were taken on a Hitachi S4800 instrument and a FEI F20 S-TWIN instrument, respectively.

Electrochemical properties of the samples were evaluated in a standard three electrode test pool (Hangzhou Saiao Electrochemistry Technology Co., Ltd). For the working electrode, a mixture containing of 70 wt% active material, 20 wt% acetylene black, and 10 wt% PTFE binder was well mixed. Then the mixture was pressed with several drops of isopropyl alcohol solvent to form a thin sheet. The sheet was rolled to get approximate thickness of 100 μm and then pressed onto the nickel foam. The mass loading of the activated material was about 5 mg cm−2. Pt electrode and saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. All electrochemical measurements were carried out in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte using an IM6 Electrochemical Workstation (Zahner). For the fabrication of the asymmetric supercapacitor, active carbon (AC) electrodes were first prepared by the way same with MnO2 electrodes. Then the MnO2 electrode was used as positive electrode and AC electrode was used as negative electrode, respectively. The mass ratio of positive electrode/negative electrode was 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 (based on charge balance theory and their respectively specific capacitance). The charge–discharge tests for the asymmetric supercapacitors were performed on the Land automatic batteries tester (Land CT 2001A, Wuhan, China). The discharge specific capacitance was calculated according to the following equation:

image file: c4ra07880b-t1.tif
where I (A) is the applied current, Δt (s) is the discharge time, ΔU (V) is the tested potential range, and m (g) is the mass of tested active material within the electrodes.

Results and discussion

Fig. 1a shows the XRD pattern of MnO2 and clearly shows two characteristic peaks at 37.1° and 66.3°, indicating the amorphous nature of MnO2.20 Fig. 1b reveals that the synthesized MnO2 exhibited a spherical structure with a diameter of 300–500 nm. A SEM image in Fig. 1c demonstrates that the spherical structure was formed by the aggregation of nanosheets. A TEM image focused on a single sphere is shown in Fig. 1d and further confirmed that the spherical structure was formed via the aggregation of nanosheets with a typical thickness of 2–4 nm. The selective area electronic diffraction (SAED) (Fig. 1d inset) shows that the synthesized MnO2 was amorphous,21 which was consistent with XRD.
image file: c4ra07880b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) XRD pattern of MnO2, (b and c) SEM and (d) TEM images of the MnO2 sample. The inset in (d) is the SAED pattern of the MnO2 sample.

The XPS spectrum was used to further determine the oxidation state of the obtained MnO2. As depicted in Fig. 2a, it clearly reveals that the binding energy peaks of Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 centered at 642.25 and 654.05 eV, respectively, which were in good agreement with the reported date for MnO2.12 The average oxidation state of Mn was around 3.55 based on the analysis of O 1s spectrum (Fig. 2b).12,20,22


image file: c4ra07880b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XPS spectra of MnO2: (a) Mn 2p and (b) O 1s.

Fig. 3a shows the CV curves of MnO2 sub-microspheres at different scan rates ranging from 5 to 100 mV s−1 with a potential window of 0 to 0.9 V. It clearly reveals an approximately rectangular shape which can keep a nearly rectangular at scan rate even as high as 100 mV s−1, indicating a typical pseudocapacitive behavior of MnO2.22,23 In addition, a pair of light redox peaks could be observed at low scan rate of 10 mV s−1 (Fig. S1), revealing a fast and reversible Faradaic reaction between alkali cations (Na+) and ultrathin MnO2 nanosheets.22–24 Fig. 3b shows the galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of MnO2 sub-microspheres at different current densities and the specific capacitances were 120 and 107 F g−1 at 0.167 and 3.333 A g−1, respectively. When the current density was increased from 0.167 to 3.333 A g−1, 89.16% of the initial capacitance could be retained, demonstrating a good rate capability.


image file: c4ra07880b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) CV curves at different scan rates and (b) charge–discharge profiles at different current densities of MnO2 electrodes.

Fig. 4 shows the cycling performance of MnO2 sub-microspheres at a current density of 1 A g−1. The specific capacitance increased slightly over the whole 3000 cycles which was similar to some reports on manganese oxide electrode materials.25,26 The increase of the specific capacitance may be attributed to the activation effect of electrochemical cycling.25 This demonstrated that the electrode of MnO2 sub-microspheres had a good electrochemical stability.


image file: c4ra07880b-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Cycling performance of MnO2 electrode.

To further investigate the electrochemical performance of MnO2 sub-microspheres, an asymmetric supercapacitor based on MnO2 and AC was fabricated. Before the test of a full cell, CV measurements were performed on the two electrodes to estimate the stable potential windows of MnO2 and AC. The MnO2 electrode was measured within a potential window of 0 to 0.9 V, while AC electrode was measured within a potential window of −0.9 to 0 V at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1, as shown in Fig. 5a. Both MnO2 and AC electrodes exhibited a nearly ideal rectangular shape at their corresponding potential windows, demonstrating their stable electrochemical performance, therefore, it is expected that the operation voltage can be extended to 1.8 V in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution. Fig. 5b shows the charge–discharge profiles of the individual electrodes vs. SEC reference electrode and the voltage profile of the asymmetric AC//MnO2 supercapacitor in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution. It can also be observed from Fig. 5b that the AC//MnO2 asymmetric supercapacitor displayed a slope voltage profile from 0 to 1.8 V, which was resulted from the potential difference between the positive electrode of MnO2 and the negative electrode of AC.


image file: c4ra07880b-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) CV curves of the MnO2 and AC electrodes, (b) charge–discharge profiles of the individual electrode (MnO2 and AC), along with the voltage profile of AC//MnO2 asymmetric supercapacitor.

Fig. 6a shows the CV curves of an asymmetric AC//MnO2 supercapacitor at different scan rates. It exhibited a good capacitive behavior with a nearly rectangular CV curves, indicating that the stable electrochemical window of the asymmetric supercapacitor can be extended to 1.8 V. Fig. 6b shows the galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles for an asymmetric AC//MnO2 supercapacitor at different current densities. The specific capacitance at a current density of 1 A g−1 (based on the total mass of active materials on the two electrodes) was 34.4 F g−1. When the current density was increased from 1 to 2 A g−1, 96% of the initial capacitance can be retained, indicating a good rate capability. The supercapacitor delivered an energy density of 15.84 W h kg−1 at a power density of 885 W kg−1, and can be maintained a value of 14.85 W h kg−1 at a power density of 1725 W kg−1, which were much higher than symmetrical supercapacitors reported in literatures such as MnO2//MnO2,27 AC//AC,28 and CNTs//CNTs.29 This is also higher or comparable to those of other asymmetric supercapacitors such as PANI//MnO2,30 PPY//MnO2,30 PEDOT//MnO2,30 Fe3O4//MnO231 and AC//MnO2.32,33


image file: c4ra07880b-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) CV curves at different scan rates and (b) charge–discharge profiles at different current densities of AC//MnO2 asymmetric supercapacitor.

Fig. 7 shows the cycling performance for an asymmetric AC//MnO2 supercapacitor at a current density of 1.5 A g−1 in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution; this device exhibited a superior electrochemical stability with a 88% retention of the initial specific capacitance (34 F g−1) after 1000 cycles. Such cycling performance was superior or at least comparable to those of other asymmetric supercapacitors, such as graphene//MnO2/grapheme,34 AC//α-MnO2·nH2O35 and AC//MnO2.36 The capacitance fading was attributed to the corrosion of the current collector arising from the presence of dissolved oxygen in the aqueous electrolyte33 or matching problem.37 The Coulombic efficiency of the asymmetric supercapacitor was above 97%, indicating good charge–discharge reversibility and electrochemical stability.38


image file: c4ra07880b-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Cycling performance of AC//MnO2 asymmetric supercapacitor.

As mentioned above, MnO2 sub-microspheres used as the electrode in a three-electrode system or an asymmetric supercapacitor all exhibited a good supercapacitive performance, which may be attributed to the intrinsic characteristics of MnO2 sub-microspheres. MnO2 sub-microspheres with a hierarchically porous structure can permit facile diffusion of the electrolyte, and also enhance the contact between the electrode surface and the electrolyte; while ultrathin nanosheets can shorten the transport distance of electrolytes and electrons during electrochemical cycling, leading to large capacitance, high rate capability and cycling stability.

Conclusions

In summary, a simple and effective route was developed for fabricating hieratical MnO2 sub-microspheres. These sub-microspheres were formed via the aggregation of ultrathin nanosheets with a thickness of 2–4 nm. The electrochemical measurements indicated that hierarchical MnO2 sub-microspheres exhibited large capacitance, high rate capability and long-term cycling stability. Thus, such a hierarchically porous nanostructure can serve as promising electrode materials for supercapacitors.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21173049; J1103303).

Notes and references

  1. G. P. Wang, L. Zhang and J. J. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 797 RSC.
  2. P. Y. Tang, Y. Q. Zhao, Y. M. Wang and C. L. Xu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 8156 RSC.
  3. P. Simon and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 845 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. L. H. Bao, J. F. Zang and X. D. Li, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 1215 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. M. J. Zhi, C. C. Xiang, J. T. Li, M. Li and N. Q. Wu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 72 RSC.
  6. P. X. Li, C. Y. Kong, Y. Y. Shang, E. Z. Shi, Y. T. Yu, W. Z. Qian, F. Wei, J. Q. Wei, K. L. Wang, H. W. Zhu, A. Y. Cao and D. H. Wu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 8472 RSC.
  7. L. F. Chen, Z. H. Huang, H. W. Liang, W. T. Yao, Z. Y. Yu and S. H. Yu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3331 CAS.
  8. U. N. Maiti, J. Lim, K. E. Lee, W. J. Lee and S. O. Kim, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 615 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. C. C. Hu, K. H. Chang, M. C. Lin and Y. T. Wu, Nano Lett., 2006, 6, 2690 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. J. Yang, T. B. Lan, J. D. Liu, Y. F. Song and M. D. Wei, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 105, 489 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. L. Z. Fan and J. Maier, Electrochem. Commun., 2006, 8, 937 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. Z. J. Su, C. Yang, C. J. Xu, H. Y. Wu, Z. X. Zhang, T. Liu, C. Zhang, Q. H. Yang, B. H. Li and F. Y. Kang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 12432 CAS.
  13. W. F. Wei, X. W. Cui, W. X. Chen and D. G. Ivey, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1697 RSC.
  14. S. Liu, S. H. Sun and X. Z. You, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 2037 RSC.
  15. V. Subramanian, H. W. Zhu and B. Q. Wei, J. Power Sources, 2006, 159, 361 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. X. L. Wang, A. B. Yuan and Y. Q. Wang, J. Power Sources, 2007, 172, 1007 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. X. Y. Wang, X. Y. Wang, W. G. Huang, P. J. Sebastian and S. Gamboa, J. Power Sources, 2005, 140, 211 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. S. L. Chou, J. Z. Wang, S. Y. Chew, H. K. Liu and S. X. Dou, Electrochem. Commun., 2008, 10, 1724 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. M. Toupin, T. Brousse and D. Belanger, Chem. Mater., 2002, 14, 3946 CrossRef CAS.
  20. Y. Hou, Y. W. Cheng, T. Hobson and J. Liu, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 2727 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. R. Liu and S. B. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2942 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. M. Toupin, T. Brousse and D. Belanger, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 3184 CrossRef CAS.
  23. Q. T. Qu, P. Zhang, B. Wang, Y. H. Chen, S. Tian and Y. P. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 14020 CAS.
  24. Z. B. Lei, J. T. Zhang and X. S. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 153 RSC.
  25. H. Jiang, T. Sun, C. Z. Li and J. Ma, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 2751 RSC.
  26. M. Toupin, T. Brousse and D. Belanger, Chem. Mater., 2002, 14, 3946 CrossRef CAS.
  27. V. Khomenko, E. R. Piñero and F. Béguin, J. Power Sources, 2006, 153, 183 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. D. W. Wang, F. Li, M. Liu, G. Q. Lu and H. M. Cheng, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120, 379 CrossRef PubMed.
  29. M. Kaempgen, C. K. Chan, J. Ma, Y. Cui and G. Gruner, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 1872 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. V. Khomenko, E. Raymundo-Pinero, E. Frackowiak and F. Beguin, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 2006, 82, 567 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. T. Cottineau, M. Toupin, T. Delahaye, T. Brousse and D. Belanger, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 2006, 82, 599 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. X. Zhang, P. Yu, H. T. Zhang, D. C. Zhang, X. Z. Sun and Y. W. Ma, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 89, 523 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. T. Brousse, P. L. Taberna, O. Crosnier, R. Dugas, P. Guillemet, Y. Scudeller, Y. Zhou, F. Favier, D. Belanger and P. Simon, J. Power Sources, 2007, 173, 633 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. Z. S. Wu, W. C. Ren, D. W. Wang, F. Li, B. L. Liu and H. M. Cheng, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 5835 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. M. S. Hong, S. H. Lee and S. W. Kim, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2002, 5, A227 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. X. Zhang, X. Z. Sun, H. T. Zhang, D. C. Zhang and Y. W. Ma, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2012, 137, 290 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. J. L. Li and F. Gao, J. Power Sources, 2009, 194, 1184 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. J. Y. Tao, N. S. Liu, L. Y. Li, J. Su and Y. H. Gao, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 2922 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra07880b

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.