Chen Wanga,
Wenjuan Lub,
Yu Tonga,
Yan Zhenga and
Yanzhao Yang*a
aKey Laboratory for Special Functional Aggregated Materials of Education Ministry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China. E-mail: yzhyang@sdu.edu.cn
bInstitute of Materia Medica, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250062, P. R. China
First published on 17th October 2014
In view of the recycling and the preconcentration of palladium (Pd) from aqueous solutions, a sulfur-bearing extractant, 1,3-diethyl-imidazole-2-thione, in an ionic liquid organic phase was evaluated for palladium extraction. The extraction conditions were examined followed by mechanism studies. The aqueous Pd(II) was extracted using a neutral extraction mechanism, which can avoid or decrease the loss of ionic liquid used in traditional methods and highlight the green credentials of the ionic liquids. The extraction system also provides a new method for the preparation of metal complexes crystals. Investigations of the extracted complexes of palladium(II) with the EEImT ligand were conducted using single crystal X-ray diffraction and computational methods. The results showed that the Pd(II)–EEImT complexes with both 1
:
1 and 1
:
2 stoichiometry can be produced during extraction, rather than simply one structure. The cis geometry of the Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 complex was more favorable than the trans geometry. This was further explained by computer calculations, which suggested that the cis configuration with a larger dipole was energetically more stable than the trans configuration.
Although solvent extraction has gained long-run development, efficient green extraction systems are still needed. Recent studies have reported the solvent extraction of palladium using ionic liquids, which are considered advantageous for their versatility and “green” credentials,9 as either the organic phase or the extractant. For example, A. Cieszynska et al. probed the use of trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride for palladium extraction from hydrochloric acid solutions.10 Katsuta and Shoichi et al.11 developed a well-founded method to selectively separate palladium and platinum by trioctylammonium-based mixed ionic liquids, which are recyclable, easy to handle, safe, and environmentally friendly. Sasaki, Kotoe et al.12 used the ionic liquid, betainium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, to extract Pd(II), Rh(III) and Ru(III) from aqueous HNO3 solutions, which proceeded via coordination between betaine and metal ions and the cation exchange of the formed complex with a proton.
During the abovementioned researches, the metal ions were extracted to the organic ionic liquid phase through an ion exchange mechanism, which are shown as follows,13–15 where the subscripts (aq), (IL) and (or) denote an aqueous phase, ionic liquid phase and organic phase, respectively.
| 2H(aq)+ + PdCl4(aq)2− + 2R3R′PA(IL) ⇔ (R3R′P)2PdCl4(or) + 2HA(aq) |
| Mn+(aq) + mL(IL) + x[Cn min][TFSA](IL) ⇔ [M(L)mn+(TFSA−)x](IL) + x[Cn min+](aq) |
| PtCl6(aq)2− + 2[C4 min] PF6(IL)+ ⇔ ([C4 min])2·PtCl6(or)2− + 2PF6(aq)− |
These mechanisms will certainly lead to the loss of ionic liquids. Therefore, to facilitate extraction, the volume of the ionic liquids phase would be relatively large, with an aqueous phase volume ratio of about 1
:
2,16 which means higher cost for applications. On the other hand, because most waste aqueous sources containing Pd(II) are acidic, and the yields of the extraction with ion exchange will fluctuate with the varying concentration of aqueous hydrogen ions,17 an extra procedure is needed to adjust the pH. Nevertheless, these disadvantages can be avoided through neutral extraction.
In our work, the sulfur-bearing extractant, 1,3-diethyl imidazole-2-thione (EEImT), was first used as the extractant to extract aqueous palladium to the ionic liquid organic phase, i.e., 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)imide ([EMIm]NTF2). The extracted complexes were formed through a neutral coordination mechanism rather than an ion exchange mechanism, which avoids the loss of ionic liquid and saves the volume of organic phase. The extraction system also provides a new method for the quick preparation of the regularly-shaped metal complexes crystals under certain conditions. Two novel PdCl2–thione crystals were obtained. X-ray crystallography and computer calculations were conducted to elucidate the construction and configuration of the Pd(II)–EEImT complexes. The extraction was barely dependent on the hydrochloric acid concentration under certain conditions. The entire system was verified to be effective and stable.
It is worth mentioning that at high complexes concentrations (0.282 mol L−1), the organic phase become rather viscous. The addition of 2 mL ethanol will easily wash out the Pd–EEImT complexes, which also can form regularly-shaped needle like crystals. This procedure was not reported previously, and it may represent a novel method to prepare crystals of metal complexes.
Single crystal X-ray diffraction was conducted using an area detecting system (Bruker-Nonius SMART APEX II CCD) and graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71000 Å). A hemisphere of data was measured using a strategy of omega scans of 0.5° per frame. Empirical absorption corrections were applied. The structures were solved by a combination of direct methods and difference Fourier syntheses. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were calculated in the ideal positions riding on the parent carbon atoms. The unit cell parameters were obtained by a full-matrix least-squares refinement. Data collection, integration, and absorption corrections were performed using the APEX222 software suite (Bruker).19 The computing structure solution and refinement was carried out using the SHELXL-97 software package (Bruker).20
Crystal data and details of the structure determination are summarized in Table 1. CCDC 994393 and 994500 contain the ESI† for the structures described in this paper.
| Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 | Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 | |
|---|---|---|
| CCDC number | 994393 | 994500 |
| Formula | C10H24Cl4N4Pd2S2 | C10H24Cl2N4PdS2 |
| Formula weight | 667.09 g mol−1 | 489.79 g mol−1 |
| Crystal system | Tetragonal | Monoclinic |
| Space group | P 21c |
C2/c |
Temperature (K) |
298(2) | 293(2) |
| a(Å) | 10.954(3) | 18.078(19) |
| b(Å) | 10.954(3) | 9.268(1) |
| cÅ) | 19.840(5) | 13.131(14) |
| α(°) | 90 | 90 |
| β(°) | 90 | 113.059(2)° |
| γ(°) | 90 | 90 |
| Cell volume (Å3) | 2380.6(8) | 2024.26(40) |
| Z | 4 | 4 |
| Total/unique reflections | 10 996 |
4756 |
| Rint | 0.1138 | 0.0291 |
| R1[I > 2σ(I)] | 0.0484 | 0.0309 |
| wR2 [I > 2σ(I)] | 0.0931 | 0.0759 |
X-ray powder diffraction was carried out using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with a graphite monochromator and Cu-K radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm).
Establishment of the optimum time to reach equilibrium was conducted by mixing 5 mL aqueous phase (0.1 mM PdCl2 in 0.1 mM HCl) and 0.5 mL organic phase (2 mM EEImT in [EMIm]NTF2 and [EMIm]NTF2 alone) from 0.5 to 30 min. The ionic liquid, [EMIm]NTF2, itself can extract only 8% of Pd(II) after 15 min of contact, whereas the addition of EEImT results in 98% extraction of Pd(II) within 3 min of contact. This indicates a fast and stable equilibrium for Pd(II) extraction with EEImT/[EMIm]NTF2. In addition, through the entire extraction process, there was no observable change in the volumes of the two phases, and no emulsion was observed between the interphase, which further represents the easy separation of the two phases.
The effect of the EEImT concentration on the palladium percentage extraction (E) was investigated. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The EPd attains maximum (about 98%) when the molar ratio of EEImT
:
Pd is 4.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 The effect of EEImT concentration (CEEImT) on the Pd(II) extraction rate (EPd). The aqueous and organic phase were in the volume ratio of 10. Aqueous Pd(II) concentration was 0.1 mM. | ||
The influence of the hydrochloric acid concentration was then studied under the optimized conditions. The addition of HCl is clearly against neutral extraction of Pd(II), because it can lower the EPd from 97.8% to 88.1%, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Influence of the hydrochloric acid concentration on the Pd(II) extraction rate. Aqueous phase: 5 mL, 0.1 mM PdCl2, organic phase: 4 mM and 5 mM EEImT in 0.5 mL [EMIm]NTF2. | ||
This was previously explained that Pd(II) exists in the form of PdCl42− at higher levels of Cl−, thus the coordination of Pd(II) and EEImT was intervened.24 It is noteworthy that the addition of 25% extra extractant will significantly shrink this decline, as the red line in Fig. 2 shows. According to many previous reports, the extraction rate will be fluctuated about ±10% with varying HCl concentration.25–27 Nevertheless, in the case of the neutral extraction with EEImT/[EMIm]NTF2, the extraction rate becomes less dependent on the H+ concentration at appropriate extractant concentration, with only −2% fluctuation in the tested range. This high hydrogen ion tolerance is more preferable for practical applications, because many palladium-recyclable effluent usually contain a variety of acids.
Back-extraction was carried out by mixing the loaded organic phase with four times the volume of stripping reagent solutions, among which the 0.5 M thiourea/1.0 M HCl and 4.0 M NH4SCN/1.5 M NH4OH were tested to be the most efficient. Both stripping reagents led to color fading of the loaded ionic liquid phase from reddish brown to white transparent, and above 96% Pd(II) was stripped to the aqueous phase through ICP-AES determination.
Because very high extractability was shown by prior experiments, the traditional slope method and Job's method become unsatisfactory for determining the stoichiometry of Pd–EEImT complex. In addition, HPLC analysis for the concentration of EEImT before and after extraction indicated that the consumed EEImT was less than two times but more than one time that of the extracted Pd(II), which means that there may be more than one structure existing in the extracted complexes (not shown). Therefore, X-ray single crystal diffraction combined with X-ray powder diffraction were alternatively used to determine the extracted complex.
According to previous cases related to neutral metal extraction,28,29 the most probable stoichiometry (1
:
1 and 1
:
2) of Pd
:
EEImT in the extracted complexes was proposed, and X-ray single crystal diffraction was conducted to verify the speculation.
Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 (Fig. 3.) adopts a bridging geometry with two Pd atoms connected to two sulfur atoms to form a parallelogram in the space group P
21c. The bond length of Pd–S is 2.311 Å and 2.290 Å, which is comparable to those observed in the related bridging palladium complexes bearing sulfur and chlorine ligands (2.280 Å and 2.271 Å,30 2.278 Å and 2.252 Å,31 2.284 Å and 2.267 Å).32 The angle between the two Pd-centered square planar structure (139.901°) is dramatically smaller than that in 165.441°,30 180.000°,31 180.000°,32 and 180.000°,33 except when the two sulfur atoms are connected together, 120.115°.34
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 Molecular structure of Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4, ORTEP representation on the 50% probability level for all non-carbon atoms. Hydrogen atoms have been deleted for clarity. | ||
Each palladium center takes the usual square planar geometry with slight distortion, because the two chlorine atoms are located at different distances from it (Pd1–Cll is 2.319 Å, whereas Pd1–Cl2 is 2.300 Å). The two Pd–S bond lengths also are slightly different (Pd1–S1 is 2.311 Å, whereas Pd1–S2 is 2.290 Å). The bonding of S with Pd induces distortion in the structural features of the diethyl-imidazole substituent.35 This may be explained by the strong intermolecular hydrogen bond formed between the Cl atoms with the C3 H atom in the adjacent imidazole rings, which provides unsymmetrical tension to the Cl atoms on the Pd atoms in the opposite site.
The Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 (Fig. 4) crystallizes in the space group C2/c with a four substituent of center Pd atoms constituting a more symmetrical structure than that of Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4. The Pd–S bond distance of 2.324 Å in Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 is close to those reported elsewhere,36–39 which is slightly longer than that of Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 (2.311 Å and 2.290 Å). This indicates that the Pd–S bond is considerably stronger in Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4. However, the higher degree of chelation of Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 (2 of chelation) can be more favorable for extraction than Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 (1 of chelation).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Molecular structure of cis-Pd(EEImT)2Cl2, ORTEP representation on the 50% probability level for all non-carbon atoms. Hydrogen atoms have been deleted for clarity. | ||
On the other hand, the XRD results (Fig. 5) of the extracted complexes revealed the production of both the 1
:
1 and 1
:
2 stoichiometry of the Pd(II)–EEImT complexed during extraction, not simply one structure. This is rather different from previous metal extraction studies, which claimed that the neutral extractant containing S or N atoms would extract palladium (or other metal ions) at a certain integral ratio (2
:
1 or 1
:
1) such as sulfoxide and even thione.28,40,41 We speculated that at relatively high Pd(II)
:
EEImT levels, about 1
:
10 to 1
:
1, the extracted complexes are composed of both 1
:
1 and 1
:
2 stoichiometry, whereas more and more 1
:
2 stoichiometry would appear with increasing extractant concentration, for its higher molecular stability.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 Experimental powder X-ray diffraction pattern of (C) complexes washed from loaded ionic liquid and simulated powder patterns for (B) Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 and (A) cis-Pd(EEImT)2Cl2. | ||
There is possibility of two structures for the configuration of Pd(EEImT)2Cl2, which involve the ligation of palladium with sulfur and chlorine atoms on diagonally opposite sides (trans, Fig. 6) and a symmetrical (cis) configuration.
The trans configurations of palladium are in the majority as reported elsewhere42–44 and are more energetically stable in view of the smaller steric hindrance.45 Nevertheless, the cis configuration was obtained according to the results of X-ray crystallography. However, the powder pattern does not completely match with the XRD result of the sediment washed out of the [EMIm]NTF2 with high levels of extracted complexes, which indicates that the trans configuration may also exist in the extracted complexes.
| Pd2(EEImT)2Cl4 | |||
| Pd–Cl1 | 2.3185(35) | Cl1–Pd–Cl2 | 93.90(14) |
| Pd–Cl2 | 2.3002(37) | S–Pd–S | 81.71(13) |
| Pd–S1 | 2.2898(34) | Pd–S–Pd | 90.56(11) |
| Pd–S2 | 2.3117(34) | Cl1–Pd–S | 92.08(14) |
| C–S | 1.7588(135) | N–C–N | 107.2(12) |
| C–S–Pd | 109.5(5) | ||
![]() |
|||
| Cis-Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 | |||
| Pd–Cl | 2.3503(10) | Cl–Pd–Cl | 90.53(5) |
| Pd–S | 2.3240(11) | Cl–Pd–S | 92.52(3) |
| C–S | 1.7434(45) | S–Pd–S | 84.56(5) |
| C–S–Pd | 103.701(137) | N–C–N | 106.6(3) |
![]() |
|||
| Optimized cis-Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 | |||
| Pd–Cl | 2.3052 | Cl–Pd–Cl | 93.47 |
| Pd–S | 2.4094 | Cl–Pd–S | 91.59 |
| C–S | 1.7207 | S–Pd–S | 83.36 |
| C–S–Pd | 102.7 | N–C–N | 108.5 |
![]() |
|||
| Optimized trans-Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 | |||
| Pd–Cl | 2.3179 | Cl–Pd–S | 93.25 |
| Pd–S | 2.3780 | C–S–Pd | 105.0 |
| C–S | 1.7217 | N–C–N | 105.2 |
:
Pd(II) molar ratio of 4. At the appropriate extractant concentrations, the extraction rate became barely dependent on the hydrochloric acid concentration, which shows that the EEImT is an efficient extractant for palladium. Furthermore, the ionic liquid-based extraction system also provides a quick and convenient method to prepare metal complexes crystals; however, detailed conditions are still waiting for the further exploration. The single X-ray diffraction results illustrated the Pd(II)–EEImT complex with 1
:
2 and 1
:
1 stoichiometry in detail. Under the experimental conditions, both structures existed in the extracted complexes dissolved in the ionic liquid. In addition, the percentage of the former will increase with increasing amount of extractant. The computer calculations further illustrated that the cis configuration of Pd(EEImT)2Cl2 possesses a lower molecular energy than the trans configuration. The larger dipole moment also promotes its stability in a polar solvent, which may explain why the crystal growth results in the cis form.
Footnote |
| † CCDC 994393 and 994500. For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c4ra07563c |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |