A simple one pot synthesis of cubic Cu5FeS4

Prashant Kumara, Meenakshi Gusaina, Pandian Senthil Kumarb, Sitharaman Umaa and Rajamani Nagarajan*a
aMaterials Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. E-mail: rnagarajan@chemistry.du.ac.in; Fax: +91-11-27666605; Tel: +91-11-27662650
bDepartment of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Received 10th July 2014 , Accepted 30th September 2014

First published on 30th September 2014


Abstract

Reaction of CuCl, FeCl3 and thiourea in ethylene glycol under refluxing conditions yielded micro flower shaped cubic Cu5FeS4 as confirmed from high resolution PXRD, SEM with EDX, UV-visible, Raman spectroscopy and magnetic measurements at room temperature.


In addition to holding a special status among copper-age minerals, and serving as copper ore, compositions belonging to Cu–Fe–S family exhibit interesting properties and are used in many areas, ranging from earth science to advanced functional materials. Presence of both Cu and Fe in the same crystal lattice imparts tuneable electrical and magnetic properties such as dilute magnetic semiconducting (DMS) behaviour.1 Additional control of properties can be achieved by varying the chemical composition/structural arrangements.2,3 Since both the metal ions present in Cu–Fe–S are earth abundant, they are projected to be low cost alternative for various I–III–VI systems (such as Cu–In–S, Cu–Ag–S, Ag–In–S, Ag–Ga–S). CuInS2 shows band gap of 1.5 eV in the visible region and therefore has been extensively studied as a photovoltaic material. On the other hand, the optical band gap for CuFeS2 (0.6 eV) does not lie in the range suitable for photovoltaic applications and this has coerced researchers to explore and identify other compositions of the Cu–Fe–S system, whose band gap is suitable to be used as photovoltaic materials. Plass and co-workers reported the optical band gap of nano particles of Cu5FeS4, obtained by the reaction of Cu(acac)2, Fe(acac)3, and elemental S in dodecanethiol and oleic acid,4 to be 1.25 eV, for the first time. However, bulk solution phase synthesis of Cu5FeS4 is essential to further study their properties as well as to examine their photovoltaic functions. To the best of our knowledge, except that of Plass and coworkers, synthesis reports for Cu5FeS4 are mostly concerned with indirect synthesis by copper enrichment or by the solid state reaction of binary sulphides at high temperatures for longer durations.5–7 Existence of large number of chemical compositions, unquenchable (and even moderate) temperature phases, presence of the metal ions, that can show variable oxidation states; and significant difference in chalcophilic character of Cu and Fe, might be the major reasons behind the fewer attempts in the exploration of a synthesis strategy for Cu–Fe–S compositions in general, and Cu5FeS4 in particular.8,9 Specific composition targeted synthetic strategy in desired symmetry, in the Cu–Fe–S system is still a challenging task. Additional difficulty arises from the polymorphic arrangements existing in Cu5FeS4 (as high, intermediate, and low bornite). The high-temperature polymorph possesses antifluorite-type structure, consisting of a random distribution of six metal cations and two vacancies in the eight tetrahedral interstices of a cubic close-packed sulphur framework and such an arrangement is stable above 270 °C.10–13 Based on the single crystal data, Morimoto10,11 has reported that the cubic symmetry of Cu5FeS4 results from the twinning of domains with rhombohedral symmetry in eight different orientations. In this rhombohedral structure, all the metal atoms are positioned in three out of four tetrahedral units in a cubic close packed sulphur sub-lattice as in the case of rhombohedral Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S).12,13 The intermediate and low forms can be described as superstructures of the high temperature cubic form due to increase in the ordering of vacancies and the metal atoms with reducing temperature.14–16

Given these complexities, phase selective, direct, reproducible, rapid and one-pot synthesis of Cu5FeS4 is justified. As cubic Cu5FeS4 and rhombohedral Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S) phases exhibit almost similar kind of atomic and vacancy ordered arrangements, it can be conceptually conceived that a solution based synthetic strategy producing Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S)17 reliably and reproducibly may be suitable for easy stabilization of Cu5FeS4 based on the kinetics and energy considerations. Also, it can be conceived that if ionized iron species can be introduced during the formation of Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S), the possibility of inclusion of iron in it will be quite high. Following our extensive research on copper sulphides and copper containing ternary sulphides,3,17–22 it was quite clear that Cu9S5 can be easily realized from the reaction of copper salts with thiourea in ethylene glycol. Therefore we studied the introduction of iron during its formation leading to Cu5FeS4 and the results are reported in this communication.

0.50 g (5 mmol) of freshly prepared CuCl, 0.81 g (5 mmol) FeCl3 (Thomas Baker, 99%) and 0.76 g (10 mmol) thiourea (SRL, 98%) were refluxed together in ethylene glycol (100 mL) for 1.5 h. After the reaction, product in the form of suspension was separated by centrifugation. Finally, it was washed several times with d.d. water, absolute alcohol, CS2 and dried at room temperature. The phase composition and structure of the final products were determined from powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns using a Bruker D8 Discover X-ray diffractometer employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) with a scan rate of 1.2 s per step and step size 0.02° at 298 K. Raman spectra of the samples, in compact form, were collected using a Renishaw spectrophotometer equipped with a microscope and operating with a laser of wavelength 514 nm. Magnetic measurements were carried out at 300 K using a vibrating sample magnetometer (Microsense EV9). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were carried out using FEI Technai G2 20 electron microscope operating at 200 kV. The morphology and elemental mapping of the final products were examined from SEM images obtained using an FESEM, FEI Quanta 200F microscope equipped with EDX accessories. UV-visible diffuse reflectance data of the samples were collected over the spectral range of 200–800 nm using a PerkinElmer Lamda 35 scanning double-beam spectrometer equipped with a 50 mm integrating sphere. Photoluminescence (PL) measurements were performed on a Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog 3 Spectrofluorometer at room temperature.

In the PXRD pattern of the product from the reaction of CuCl, FeCl3 and thiourea in ethylene glycol, sharp reflections in the 2θ range of 10–70° were observed indicating high crystalline nature of the samples (Fig. 1(a)). The presence of less number of reflections suggested that the product possessed higher symmetry. The shift of the observed reflections towards higher 2θ values with respect to Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S) indicated possible inclusion of an additional cation in it. Further, a search of the JCPDS data base for high symmetry compositions consisting of Cu, Fe and S yielded a close match with Cu5FeS4 (JCPDS file no. 34-0135) and therefore the observed peaks were indexed in cubic symmetry (space group Fm3m (#225)) with lattice constant of a = 10.98 Å.13 Of the many fundamental problems on the super structure of bornite, Fe/Cu ordering plays a significant and decisive role on the final ordering present in the samples. Based on magnetic structure, TEM studies coupled with first principle calculations, two Fe/Cu ordering schemes indicating the filling of Fe in the tetrahedral sites of sulphur atoms in the antifluroite cube, and the vacancies at the copper positions having zinc blende cube of the superstructure have been found to exist in Cu5FeS4.13 A difference in energy of 52.7 meV per unit cell has been computed between these two orderings.13 As Fe and Cu exhibit similar X-ray and electron scattering factors, the unequivocal assignment of the observed phase as Cu5FeS4 and not Cu9S5 may not be absolutely certain, even though the observed peak at higher 2θ (around 69°) is observed only for Cu5FeS4. Therefore, additional evidence has been gathered from Raman spectroscopy measurements. The sample showed one strong peak at 472 cm−1 (shown in Fig. 1(b)) in the Raman spectrum.23 However, on deconvolution, the presence of two bands at 465 cm−1 and 472 cm−1 was evident (inset of Fig. 1(b)). Since such a deconvolution was not observed in the Raman spectrum of Cu9S5 (Fig. S3 ESI), this was crucial evidence for the formation of Cu5FeS4.


image file: c4ra06939k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) PXRD pattern of the product obtained by reaction of CuCl, FeCl3 and thiourea in ethylene glycol for 1.5 h and (b) Raman spectrum of Cu5FeS4 obtained in the present set of reactions. Inset in (b) shows the deconvolution of the Raman spectrum. JCPDS cards for Cu5FeS4 and Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S) are provided for easy comparison.

A low magnification FESEM image of Cu5FeS4 is presented in Fig. 2(a) showing uniform flower like structure with an average diameter of 10 μm. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern recorded from the high resolution TEM showed well defined spots that were indexed corresponding to [800], [444], [440], [331], [311] planes of the cubic cell (Fig. 2). On higher magnification, micro-flower morphology consisting of a hierarchical structure was observed (Fig. 2(b)). The nanosheets intersected with each other resulting in a net like structure with porous surfaces. Interestingly, 3D flower structures assembled by a large number of nanosheets with an average thickness of 14 nm. Similar microflower morphology have earlier been observed for CuS and SnS2 obtained in ethylene glycol and polyethylene glycol, respectively.17,24 It is therefore reasonable to state that the ethylene glycol solvent system used in the current study resulted in the microflower morphology. The emission spectrum of the sample at an excitation wavelength of 500 nm showed a low intensity signal centered at 750 nm. Such emission characteristics were not observed or reported earlier for Cu–S compositions. EDX analysis of the sample revealed Cu[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]Fe[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]S as 4.9[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1.4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3.8, closely matching with the expected ratio between copper, iron and sulphur (Fig. S2). However, emissions in this range are usually observed for non-stoichiometric copper containing I–III–VI2 compounds,22,25 thereby suggesting the possibility of iron incorporation in the Cu–S system. Paramagnetic behaviour of the sample (inset of Fig. 3(a)), observed at room temperature also offered additional support for the presence of magnetic Fe3+ ion in the sample. Copper sulphide (CuxS) compositions are known to show weak paramagnetism only for x = 1–1.12.17 Also, iron sulphide compositions, synthesized by the reaction of FeCl3 with thiourea were reported to exhibit ferromagnetic behaviour25 and not a simple paramagnetic behaviour. From the UV-visible spectroscopy data (shown in Fig. 3(b)), a band gap value of 1.25 eV was deduced for Cu5FeS4, which was quite comparable with the reported value.4


image file: c4ra06939k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) and (b) show the low and high magnification FESEM image of cubic Cu5FeS4. Indexed SAED pattern from the TEM experiments is shown in (c).

image file: c4ra06939k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) and (b) show photoluminescence emission obtained with λexc = 500 nm and UV-visible absorbance spectrum spectrum of Cu5FeS4, respectively. Plot of magnetic field versus magnetization and plot of photon energy (eV) vs. (αhυ)2 are shown in the insets of (a) and (b), respectively.

To answer whether the reaction of other iron salts such as Fe(NO3)3·9H2O or Fe2(SO4)3 with CuCl and thiourea could yield Cu5FeS4 or any other ternary composition, experiments were performed under identical conditions using the above salts as iron sources.

PXRD patterns of the products from these reactions showed the formation of binary sulphides of copper and iron (Fig. S4 ESI). These results hinted the possible mechanism of formation of copper rich Cu5FeS4 from the reaction of CuCl, FeCl3 and thiourea. Independent reactions of CuCl with thiourea and FeCl3 with thiourea by polyol process have been reported to yield copper rich Cu1.8S and Fe3S4, respectively.26 The occurrence of these two species in higher symmetry along with the highly cation fluidic character of Cu1.8S possibly might have promoted the formation of copper rich cubic Cu5FeS4.27 Also, the existence of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in Fe3S4 increases the probability of cation exchange with Cu1+ and Cu2+ present in Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S).

Conclusion

High bornite Cu5FeS5 was synthesized in pure form by adopting a target oriented approach, derived from isostructural binary copper sulphide, following a single step and one pot strategy. As the reactions are simple and scalable, they can easily be implemented under industrial conditions for viable applications.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank DST (Nanomission) and DST (SR/S1/PC-07/2011(G)), New Delhi, Govt of India, for the financial support provided for this work. One of the authors MG thanks CSIR, Govt of India for SRF fellowship.

Notes and references

  1. K. J. Klabunde, Nanoscale Materials in Chemistry, Wiley Interscience, 2001 Search PubMed.
  2. L. Barkat, N. Hamdadou, M. Morsli, A. Khelil and J. C. Bernède, J. Cryst. Growth, 2006, 297, 426 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. P. Kumar, S. Uma and R. Nagarajan, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7316 RSC.
  4. A. M. Wiltrout, N. J. Freymeyer, T. Machani, P. Rossi and K. E. Plass, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 19286 RSC.
  5. W. M. B. Roberts, Econ. Geol., 1963, 58, 52 CrossRef CAS.
  6. D. B. Roberts and D. J. Williams, Mater. Res. Bull., 1974, 10, 163 CrossRef.
  7. R. Berger and R. V. Bucur, Solid State Ionics, 1996, 89, 269 CrossRef CAS.
  8. P. B. Barton Jr, Econ. Geol., 1973, 68, 455 CrossRef.
  9. V. Raghavan, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 2004, 25, 450 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. N. Morimoto and G. Kullerud, Am. Mineral., 1961, 46, 1270 CAS.
  11. Y. Kanazawa, K. Koto and N. Morimoto, Can. Mineral., 1978, 16, 397 CAS.
  12. N. Morimoto, Acta Crystallogr., 1964, 17, 351 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Y. Ding, D. R. Weblen and C. T. Prewitt, Am. Mineral., 2005, 90, 1265 CrossRef CAS.
  14. K. Koto and N. Morimoto, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem., 1975, 31, 2268 CrossRef.
  15. L. Pierce and P. R. Buseck, Am. Mineral., 1978, 63, 1 CAS.
  16. A. Putnis and J. Grace, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1976, 55, 311 CrossRef CAS.
  17. P. Kumar, M. Gusain and R. Nagarajan, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 3065 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. P. Kumar and R. Nagarajan, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 50, 9204 CrossRef PubMed.
  19. M. Gusain, P. Rawat and R. Nagarajan, Mat.Lett., 2014, 133, 220 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. P. Kumar, R. Nagarajan and R. Sarangi, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 2448 RSC.
  21. P. Kumar, M. Gusain and R. Nagarajan, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51, 7945 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. M. Gusain, P. Kumar and R. Nagarajan, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 18863 RSC.
  23. (a) B. Minceva-Sukarova, M. Najdoski, I. Grozdanov and C. J. Chunnilall, J. Mol. Struct., 1997, 410–411, 267 CAS; (b) T. P. Mernagh and A. G. Trudu, Chem. Geol., 1993, 103, 113 CrossRef CAS.
  24. H. Ke, W. Luo, G. Cheng, X. Tian and Z. Pi, Micro Nano Lett., 2009, 4, 177 CAS.
  25. (a) M. Uehara, K. Watanabe, Y. Tajiri, H. Nakamura and H. Maeda, J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 129, 134709 CrossRef PubMed; (b) C. I. Pearce, R. A. D. Pattrick and D. J. Vaughan, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 2006, 51, 127 CrossRef.
  26. (a) D.-G. Lee, N.-H. Lee, H.-J. Oh, S.-C. Jung, J.-S. Hwang, W.-J. Lee and S.-J. Kim, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2011, 11, 1434 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. Shen, D. Chen, K. Tang, X. Liu, L. Huang and Y. Qian, J. Solid State Chem., 2003, 173, 232 CrossRef CAS.
  27. X. Lu, Z. Zhuang, Q. Peng and Y. Li, CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 4039 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: PXRD patterns of the reaction products using Fe(III) sulfate and Fe(III) nitrate as the iron source with CuCl and thiouera, EDX spectrum of Cu5FeS4, Raman spectrum of Cu9S5 (Cu1.8S), comparison of PXRD pattern obtained in the present study with the standard JCPDS files of iron sulphide. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra06939k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.