Lead ions removal from aqueous solution in a novel bioelectrochemical system with a stainless steel cathode

Tao Boab, Lixia Zhanga, Xiaoyu Zhua, Xiaohong Hea, Yong Taoa, Jintao Zhangc and Daping Li*ab
aKey Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China. E-mail: lidp@cib.ac.cn; Tel: +86-028-82890211
bEnvironmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China
cPetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, P. R. China

Received 29th June 2014 , Accepted 13th August 2014

First published on 13th August 2014


Abstract

Heavy metal pollution, especially lead pollution in water, has been a growing concern due to the toxicity of lead to human and other beings. According to previous reports, bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) showed significant advantages in heavy metal ions removal, but have not been considered for Pb2+ removal. In this study, a novel BES with stainless steel cathode distinguished with traditional BESs was employed with mixed culture as biocatalyst for removing Pb2+ from solution. The results indicated Pb2+ could be effectively removed and hydrocerussite as the final product confirmed by X-ray diffraction was deposited on the stainless steel cathode. Furthermore, the principle of Pb2+ removal was deduced based on the experiment of the reduction of ferricyanide in the stainless steel tube-type BES. In brief, we suggested a novel low-cost approach to remove and recover Pb2+ from Pb2+-containing wastewater.


1 Introduction

Lead, which is widely used as an industrial raw material for battery manufacturing, acid metal plating and finishing, ammunition, tetraethyl lead manufacturing, ceramic and glass industries printing, and the painting and dying industry,1,2 has been considered as one of the most toxic contaminants discharged into the environment requiring urgent and intensive monitoring and strong policies.3 It is reported that lead is non-biodegradable and toxic to human beings, especially children.4,5 Prolonged exposure induces lead accumulation in the body and may cause adverse effects on the brain and nervous system, heart, kidneys, blood and reproductive systems.6–8 Numerous technologies have been developed for Pb2+ removal, including sorption,9–12 filtration,2,13,14 electrochemical technology,3,6,15 and precipitation.1,16 These methods are especially effective for Pb2+ removal, but have disadvantages including hard-recovery, high cost, requirement electricity supply and secondary pollution.

Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) are emerging technologies which use exoelectrogens attached to electrode to catalyze oxidation reaction in bioanode and/or reduction reaction in biocathode.17 And BESs has been successfully tested for Cr6+, V5+ and Cu2+ treatment.18–20 These results indicated that BESs offer a promising potential for the reductive treatment of metal pollutants as well as organics. However, few researches have been previously launched on using BESs to remove Pb2+ from solution. Additionally, carbon felts which were used as cathode in those studies not only make recovery very difficult, but also go against scaling up equipment for industry. Therefore, it's critical to choose proper electrode material as cathode for metal recovery and equipment scaling-up in future.

Stainless steel (SS) with high mechanical properties and long-term resistance to corrosion is a kind of commercial industrial material used in many different compositions and morphologies.21 Hence it offers a large range of engineering possibility for scaling up electrode. It allows solid, cost-effective, easy-to-handle equipment to be built, which is stable in the long-term and easy to maintain.21 Furthermore, SS has been demonstrated a promising electrode material in BES for wastewater treatment, current generation and hydrogen evolution.21,22 However, the use of SS cathode for metal removal has never been attempted.

The objective of this study was to set up a bioelectrochemical reactor with SS cathode and investigate the feasibility of Pb2+ removal in this reactor. Furthermore, we conducted the experiment of ferricyanide reduction in the same reactor in order to deduce lead removal mechanism.

2 Material and methods

2.1 BESs design

The main body of BES consisted of a stainless steel cylinder (SUS304, diameter: 7.6 cm, height: 10 cm) that was concurrently used as the cathode with the effective area of 173.8 cm2 in the catholyte, which was put into a Plexiglas container (10 width × 10 height × 10 depth cm). The anode was carbon felt (length: 20 cm, height: 7 cm) that was respectively washed in 1 M HCl, 1 M NaOH and deionized water until neutral before inserting into the stainless steel cylinder. The cathode and anode were fixed by titanium wire for linking external resistance (Rext, 100 Ω) as an external load. The schematic of the reactor was used in this research was shown in Fig. 1. For observing the morphology of the attachment on the cathode, a piece of SS patch (SUS304, 1 width × 1 height × 0.1 depth cm) was adhered on the outer of stainless steel cylinder with conductive carbon double-sided tape (LG25K, NISSHIN EM Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
image file: c4ra06398h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The schematic of the reactor which was used in this study.

2.2 Chemicals and BESs startup

The anodic chamber of BES1, i.e. SS cylinder inner, was inoculated with 10 ml of mixed culture from operating MFC running on acetate and 200 ml of medium contained (for 1 L): 0.10 g KCl, 0.25 g NH4Cl, 10.92 g Na2HPO4·12H2O, 3.04 g NaH2PO4·2H2O, 10 ml vitamin solution,23 10 ml mineral solution23 and 2.00 g CH3COONa with the initial pH of 7.0. Afterwards, an Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat.) electrode as a reference electrode was placed in the anode chamber, where was sparged with pure N2 for 10 min before sealing for maintaining anaerobic condition. The cathodic chamber, i.e. SS cylinder outer, was filled with 500 ml of electrolyte containing 0.1 M NaCl, and continuously sparged with air to supply O2 as electron acceptor. When the voltage output was stable, it indicated the BES startup successfully. An abiotic anode reactor which was similar to BES1 except the anode wasn't inoculated with 10 ml of mixed culture was applied as the blank (BES0).

2.3 Electrochemical test for the bioanode

After the BES run stably, a piece of carbon felt anode attached by microorganism was cut off and applied to cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurement. CV was performed on an electrochemical workstation (E550, Gaoss Union, China) in a single glass cell (50 ml) containing 40 ml fresh electrolyte with a three-electrode system. Bioanode, abiotic anode (carbon felt without culture) and treated bioanode (the bioanode was boiled for 5 min) served as the working electrodes with the same size (1 width × 1 length cm). An Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat.) and a Pt wire were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively. Additionally, CV was conducted in a potential range from −0.8 to 0.4 V at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1. The electrolyte was the same as the anolyte of the above BESs startup. Before each experiment, the liquid and headspace of the reactor were sparged with N2 gas for 5 min to remove the dissolved oxygen.

2.4 BES voltage output

A computer with a date collector (BRH8271, RuiBoHua, China) was used to gather terminal voltage of external resistance with or without acceptor respectively at 5 min interval for 24 h after the reactor was stable. For no electron acceptor, basal catholyte contained 4 g L−1 NaNO3 was sparged with N2 gas for 10 min to remove the major dissolved oxygen before sealing. Oxygen and 150 mg L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] were added into basal catholyte as acceptor, respectively.

2.5 Pb2+ removal experiments

The anolyte was replaced by fresh medium and the catholyte was replaced with Pb(NO3)2 solution containing 40 mg Pb2+/L and 4 g L−1 NaNO3 after washing the cathodic chamber three times with distilled water for cleaning away interfering ions. The initial pH of catholyte was lowered to 4.00 by addition of HNO3. 1 ml of catholyte was taken at 8 hours interval for residual Pb2+ concentration measurement. When test was end, the piece of SS patch adhered on the outer of stainless steel cylinder of the BES was taken out, washed with deionized water and dried in the air for scanning electron microscope (SEM) and powder scraped from SS cathode was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD).

2.6 Indirect experiment for lead reduction

In order to investigate the mechanism of Pb2+ removal, 150 mg L−1 of K3[Fe(CN)6] instead of Pb2+ were filled in the cathodic chamber. The control BES was the same as previously motioned in Pb2+ removal experiments except catholyte. 3 ml catholyte was taken once a day at 24 hours interval for the concentration measurement of K3[Fe(CN)6] and K4[Fe(CN)6].

All experiments were repeated three times at about 25 °C with the same anolyte except special declaration, while fresh anolyte was feed in anodic chamber at the end of every experiment. And results are presented as the mean values from the replicate analyses.

2.7 Chemical analysis and calculation

The concentration of lead, iron and chromium were measured by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS, Z-2300, Hitachi, Japan). The concentration of K3[Fe(CN)6] was analyzed by spectrophotometer (TU-1810, Purkinje General, China) with a characteristic absorption at 420 nm. Additional, K4[Fe(CN)6] was assumed the product reduced from K3[Fe(CN)6], the concentration of which could be confirmed by KMnO4 measurement with an absorption peak at 535 nm according to the reaction eqn (3):
 
3Fe(CN)4−6 + MnO4 + 4H+ = 3Fe(CN)3−6 + MnO2(S) + 2H2O (1)

Then, the concentration of K4[Fe(CN)6] was calculated by formula as follow:

 
image file: c4ra06398h-t1.tif(2)
where n = 3, is the number of oxidation of K4[Fe(CN)6] by 1 mol KMnO4; ΔC is the change of concentration of KMnO4 (mg L−1); V1 is the volume of KMnO4 solution added into reaction system (ml); V2 is the volume of sample of catholyte (ml); MK4[Fe(CN)6] = 368, is molecular weight of K4[Fe(CN)6]; MKMnO4 = 158, is molecular weight of KMnO4.

2.8 SEM measurement

The morphology of precipitates on the electrode was examined with SEM (S4800, Hitachi, Japan). Two adjacent sites (one was covered with the attachment, the other not) were chosen for energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, IE250, Oxford, Britain) under the same condition (acceleration voltage of 20 KV with spacing of 15 mm).

2.9 XRD measurement

The crystal structure of precipitates on the electrode was examined with XRD at an acceleration voltage of 5.0 kV. XRD patterns were recorded with Bragg-Brentano geometry in a XPERT PRO DX2500 diffractometer. Data collection was carried out at room temperature using monochromatic Cu KR1 radiation in the 2θ region between 10° and 80°, step size 0.03°.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Electrocatalytic activity of the anode

After the BES run stably, cyclic voltammetry was performed to detect the electrocatalytic activity of the abiotic electrode (carbon felt without culture, (a)), bioanode (b) and treated bioanode (the bioanode was boiled for 5 min, (c)) with synthetic organic wastewater as electrolyte. When the abiotic electrode (i.e. carbon felt without culture) was used as working electrode, no oxidation–reduction peak was observed (Fig. 2a), showing no electrochemical activity. However, two strong oxidation peaks were respectively appeared at −0.30 V and −0.35 V when bioanode attached with mixture culture served as the working electrode (Fig. 2b). It was suggested that biofilm cells on the anode could transfer electrons from substrate to electrode. But CV of the sterilized bioanode (boiled for 5 min) had no peaks, the shape of which was very similar to that of the abiotic electrode (Fig. 2c). These results demonstrated that an established biofilm which were responsible for the direct electron transfer from electron donor source to electrode had formed on the anode in the BES.
image file: c4ra06398h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Cyclic voltammograms of the anode. (a) anode without a biofilm, (b) the anode with a biofilm and (c) the anode with a sterilized biofilm.

3.2 BES voltage output

Fig. 3 indicated different electron acceptor impacted on the terminal voltage of external resistance (18.20 ± 3.99 mV for no electron acceptor, 29.74 ± 1.71 mV for oxygen and 69.87 ± 6.06 mV for K3[Fe(CN)6], respectively) in this BES. Furthermore, the output lowered with the decrease of K3[Fe(CN)6] concentration. In control case the voltage was maintained at 5.75 ± 4.64 mV with or without electron acceptors. Although ionic connection wasn't developed between SS cylinder inner and outer in our research, the result that electron acceptor influenced on output was similar to conventional BES.24 That hinted there must be some relationship between inner and outer of the SS, but an appropriate principle wasn't found to explain the phenomenon. However, the BES output was fairly low in relation to traditional BES, so in this research waste treatment was more important destination than current generation.
image file: c4ra06398h-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Voltage continuous output in the BES. Different electron acceptors (oxygen and 150 mg L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6) were applied to detect the effect on voltage and for observing background voltage testing was conducted under no electron acceptor.

3.3 Pb2+ effective removal in the BES with SS cathode

Fig. 4 showed the concentration of Pb2+ decreased gradually from 39.21 mg L−1 to 1.29 mg L−1 with the removal rate of 0.53 mg L−1 h−1 and the removal efficiency of 97% for 72 h in the experimental BES. In control case, there was almost no change of Pb2+ concentration from 38.57 mg L−1 to 37.33 mg L−1. In addition, tiny metal-brilliant crystals appeared on the smooth surface of SS cathode after the test. However, there was very little deposit on the SS surface of the control group (Fig. A1). Furthermore, the SEM pictures demonstrated that polygonal solid evenly covered the surface of SS cathode in the BES (Fig. 5A), whereas the same or analogous solid wasn't found in the control case (Fig. 5B). In order to explore the composition of solid sediment on SS, EDS was carried out at two adjacent sites (Fig. 5C) and the results indicated that the element of lead was appeared in attachment on the electrode after BES run 72 h in experimental group compared to control case (Fig. 5D and E).
image file: c4ra06398h-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Changes of Pb2+ concentration. Pb2+ concentration during 72 h operation with the initial concentration of 40 mg L−1 Pb−2+ and 4 g L−1 of NaNO3 in BES1 (with inocula, ■) and BES0 (without inocula, □). The slope of regression equation represents the average removal rate.

image file: c4ra06398h-f5.tif
Fig. 5 SEM pictures and EDS spectrum. Scanning electron micrographs of the SS patch adhered on the outer of SS cylinder in BES1 (A) and BES0 (B) after 72 h operation. Two adjacent sites with (spectrum 1) and without (spectrum 2) attachment were chose for EDS test (C). EDS spectra (D and E) show composition of the entire particle.

3.4 Hydrocerussite as the final product for Pb2+ removal

To further confirm what the final product is, the solid sediment on SS was scraped for XRD analysis. The results showed that eight intense peaks appeared at 2θ = 11.3°, 19.8°, 24.6°, 27.1°, 34.2°, 40.4°, 54.0° and 71.5°, corresponding well with the most intense peaks of hydrocerussite (Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 (PDF no. 013-0131)) (Fig. 6). Additionally, Chemical tests had verified when molar mass of Na2CO3 was insufficient in relation to Pb(NO3)2, the product was cerussite (Fig. A2A). On the contrary, the product was hydrocerussite when Pb(NO3)2 was lacking (Fig. A2B). According to composition of hydrocerussite, hydroxyl was indispensable in the formation of hydrocerussite.25 However, it was noted that lead ion was abundant in solution and acidic condition was maintained in this study, which could eliminate the possibility of the direct formation of hydrocerussite. Therefore, it was interesting that how the process happened from lead ions to hydrocerussite.
image file: c4ra06398h-f6.tif
Fig. 6 XRD powder pattern. XRD powder pattern for particulate matter on SS cathode in BES1 and the standard XRD pattern for hydrocerussite (Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 (PDF no. 13-0131)). Peak labels: d = 7.84 at 11.3°, d = 4.47 at 19.8°, d = 3.61 at 24.6°, d = 3.27 at 27.1°, d = 2.63 at 34.2°, d = 2.23 at 40.4°, d = 1.70 at 54.0° and d = 2.31 at 71.5°.

3.5 Metal lead as intermediate for Pb2+ removal

Based on the experimental facts of precipitation dried in air in this research, we hypothesized that hydrocerussite was spontaneously formed from metal lead with oxygen, water and carbon dioxide26 according to the chemical equations as follow:
 
6Pb + 3O2 + 2H2O + 4CO2 = 2Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 (3)

If the above hypothesis was true, metal lead would be the important intermediate generated from lead ion reduced by electron in the novel BES with SS cathode. Unfortunately, metal lead was too difficult to determine because of its active chemical property in air, so that an indirect test of using ferricyanide instead of Pb2+ as electron acceptor was applied in the same reactor described above to identify the Pb2+ reduction was possible in this reactor.

The experimental phenomena apparently showed the color of the catholyte contained K3[Fe(CN)6] changed from yellow to colorless after five days operation of BES. Furthermore, Fig. 7A indicated the concentration of K3[Fe(CN)6] in solution gradually decreased from 151.67 mg L−1 to 10.67 mg L−1 for five days, and the concentration of K4[Fe(CN)6] was up to 141.14 mg L−1 at the end. However, the concentration of K3[Fe(CN)6] was from 157.00 mg L−1 to 125.83 mg L−1 in the control reactor without inocula. In thermodynamics, it's possible that Fe(CN)63− react with the content, included iron, manganese, nickel and chromium, consisted of SS to form Fe(CN)64−. However, Fe3+, Mn2+, Fe2+ and Ni2+ respectively precipitate with Fe(CN)63− and Fe(CN)64− (Fig. A3), to test iron and chromium concentration could deduce the reaction motioned above happened or not. The result iron kept 32.77 ± 0.54 mg L−1 and no chromium detected (Fig. 7B) meant the transformation of Fe(CN)63− to Fe(CN)64− wasn't caused by Fe(CN)63− reaction with SS. So the reactor used in this research could result in the reduction of Fe(CN)63− to Fe(CN)64−. By analogy, Pb2+ was reduced to metal lead in this device possibly. Especially, the cathode potential reached the potential for Pb2+ reduction (Fig. A4). But the deduction about Pb2+ reduction in this reactor will need to be further verified in future. Additionally, what material resulted in reduction reaction will be studied necessarily.


image file: c4ra06398h-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Changes of ion concentration in catholyte. (A) Changes of the concentration of potassium ferricyanide (■) and potassium ferrocyanide (▼) in BES1 and concentration of potassium ferricyanide in BES0 (□) as a function of duration under 150 mg L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] and 4 g L−1 NaNO3 at about 25 °C for five days. (B) Changes of the concentration of iron and chromium in the catholyte of BES1.

4 Conclusions

In this research, the results indicated Pb2+ could be effectively removed and hydrocerussite as the final products were deposited on the stainless steel cathode in this BES. Furthermore, metal Lead as intermediate was critical for Pb2+ removal. Subsequently, the metal lead was oxidized with carbon dioxide, oxygen and water into hydrocerussite. The general electrochemical reaction can be expressed as follow:
 
CH3COO + 2H2O + 4Pb2+ = 2CO2 + 7H+ + 4Pb (4)

And the general reaction in this work can be described as follow:

 
3CH3COO + 10H2O + 12Pb2+ + 6O2 + 2CO2 = 21H+ + 4Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 (5)

In brief, we suggested a novel low-cost approach to remove and recover Pb2+ from Pb2+-containing wastewater.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51074149).

References

  1. D. Kavak, Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by precipitation: statistical analysis and modeling, Desalin. Water Treat., 2013, 51, 1720–1726 CrossRef CAS.
  2. K. V. Trivunac and S. M. Stevanovic, Effects of operating parameters on efficiency of lead removal by complexation-microfiltration process, Hem. Ind., 2012, 66, 461–466 CrossRef CAS.
  3. J. E. D. V. Segundo, G. R. Salazar-Banda, A. C. O. Feitoza, E. O. Vilar and E. B. Cavalcanti, Cadmium and lead removal from aqueous synthetic wastes utilizing chemelec electrochemical reactor: study of the operating conditions, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2012, 88, 107–115 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. T. A. Saleh and V. K. Gupta, Column with CNT/magnesium oxide composite for lead(II) removal from water, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2012, 19, 1224–1228 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. Stop lead poisoning in children, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2013/lead-20131018/en/.
  6. Y. X. Liu, J. M. Yan, D. X. Yuan, Q. L. Li and X. Y. Wu, The study of lead removal from aqueous solution using an electrochemical method with a stainless steel net electrode coated with single wall carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 218, 81–88 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. K. S. Kang, The Cause of Highly Efficient Lead Removal with Silica Spheres Modifying the Surface by a Base Catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 4101–4104 CrossRef CAS.
  8. Lead poisoning and health, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs379/en/.
  9. Y. S. Ho, Effect of pH on lead removal from water using tree fern as the sorbent, Bioresour. Technol., 2005, 96, 1292–1296 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. Y. Tang, L. Chen, X. Wei, Q. Yao and T. Li, Removal of lead ions from aqueous solution by the dried aquatic plant, Lemna perpusilla Torr, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 244–245, 603–612 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. S. Saoiabi, S. El Asri, A. Laghzizil, A. Saoiabi, J. L. Ackerman and T. Coradin, Lead and zinc removal from aqueous solutions by aminotriphosphonate-modified converted natural phosphates, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 211, 233–239 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. S. V. Dimitrova and D. R. Mehandgiev, Lead removal from aqueous solutions by granulated blast-furnace slag, Water Res., 1998, 32, 3289–3292 CrossRef CAS.
  13. A. Gholami, A. R. Moghadassi, S. M. Hosseini, S. Shabani and F. Gholami, Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl chloride based nanocomposite nanofiltration-membrane modified by iron oxide nanoparticles for lead removal from water, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20, 1517–1522 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. I. Hajdu, M. Bodnar, Z. Csikos, S. Wei, L. Daroczi, B. Kovacs, Z. Gyori, J. Tamas and J. Borbely, Combined nano-membrane technology for removal of lead ions, J. Membr. Sci., 2012, 409, 44–53 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. C.-V. Gherasim, J. Křivčík and P. Mikulášek, Investigation of batch electrodialysis process for removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 256, 324–334 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. T. A. Ioannidis, N. Kyriakis, A. I. Zouboulis and P. Akrivos, Lead and bromide precipitation from aqueous acidic solutions. Potential exploitation in industrial applications, Desalination, 2007, 211, 272–285 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. H. V. Hamelers, A. Ter Heijne, T. H. Sleutels, A. W. Jeremiasse, D. P. Strik and C. J. Buisman, New applications and performance of bioelectrochemical systems, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2010, 85, 1673–1685 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. L. Liu, Y. Yuan, F. B. Li and C. H. Feng, In situ Cr(VI) reduction with electrogenerated hydrogen peroxide driven by iron-reducing bacteria, Bioresour. Technol., 2011, 102, 2468–2473 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. B. G. Zhang, S. G. Zhou, H. Z. Zhao, C. H. Shi, L. C. Kong, J. J. Sun, Y. Yang and J. R. Ni, Factors affecting the performance of microbial fuel cells for sulfide and vanadium(V) treatment, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 2010, 33, 187–194 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. H. C. Tao, M. Liang, W. Li, L. J. Zhang, J. R. Ni and W. M. Wu, Removal of copper from aqueous solution by electrodeposition in cathode chamber of microbial fuel cell, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 189, 186–192 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. D. Pocaznoi, A. Calmet, L. Etcheverry, B. Erable and A. Bergel, Stainless steel is a promising electrode material for anodes of microbial fuel cells, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 9645–9652 CAS.
  22. L. Soussan, J. Riess, B. Erable, M. L. Delia and A. Bergel, Electrochemical reduction of CO2 catalysed by Geobacter sulfurreducens grown on polarized stainless steel cathodes, Electrochem. Commun., 2013, 28, 27–30 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. D. R. Lovley and E. J. Phillips, Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1988, 54, 1472–1480 CAS.
  24. L. L. Wei, H. L. Han and J. Q. Shen, Effects of cathodic electron acceptors and potassium ferricyanide concentrations on the performance of microbial fuel cell, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 12980–12986 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. Y. Xie and D. E. Giammar, Effects of flow and water chemistry on lead release rates from pipe scales, Water Res., 2011, 45, 6525–6534 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. X. Cao, L. Q. Ma, M. Chen, D. W. Hardison and W. G. Harris, Lead transformation and distribution in the soils of shooting ranges in Florida, USA, Sci. Total Environ., 2003, 307, 179–189 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra06398h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.