Lewis- and Brønsted-acid cooperative catalytic radical coupling of aldehydes and azodicarboxylate

Hong-Bo Zhang, Yao Wang, Yun Gu and Peng-Fei Xu*
State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry and College of Chemistry &Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P.R. China. E-mail: xupf@lzu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-931-8915557

Received 28th May 2014 , Accepted 13th June 2014

First published on 13th June 2014


Abstract

An efficient radical coupling reaction of aldehydes and azodicarboxylate was developed by using the strategy of merging Lewis- and Brønsted- acid catalysis.


The formation of the C–N bond is one of the most important transformations in organic synthesis that has wide applications for the synthesis of numerous natural and unnatural biologically active molecules.1 As a result, tremendous efforts have been made to develop various C–N bond forming methods over the last few decades. One subclass of these efficient reactions using azodicarboxylates as electrophiles has generated a considerable amount of interest.2–6 Although many types of reactions using azodicarboxylates have been extensively studied, the hydroacylation reaction with aldehydes has far less been investigated.7–10 Some limitations still exist and need to be further addressed despite a few elegant reports of this kind of hydroacylation. Especially, the reactivity and scope of substrates need to be significantly improved. For examples, the reactions with aromatic aldehydes are very slow and generally complete in several days with low yields. Therefore, it is highly desired to develop an efficient and straightforward method with broad scope of the substrates and high yields for such reactions.7–11 Cooperative catalysis has emerged as one of the most stimulating, dynamic and synthetically powerful areas in contemporary organic synthesis,12 while Lewis acid catalysis and Brønsted acid catalysis represent two fundamental activation modes in organic synthesis. We envisaged that the merging of these two modes could provide new insights into designing and developing new reactions.

Modern transition-metal-catalysed reactions have been shown to be of indispensable value for organic synthesis.8,9 Cobalt, as one of the “life” elements existing in many metalloenzymes, has received considerable attention from synthetic community. The development of cobalt-mediated radical reactions such as cyclization and polymerization etc. has attracted great interests.13–21

Inspired by these elegant cobalt-mediated radical works, we further reasoned that with the use of both an appropriate cobalt catalyst and Brønsted acid catalyst, an efficient radical coupling of aldehydes and azodicarboxylate with broad substrates scope might be realized. Here, we report that the merging of cobalt Lewis acid catalysis and Brønsted acid catalysis can efficiently promote the radical coupling of aldehydes and azodicarboxylates.

However, due to its low reactivity, 4-methoxybenzaldehyde has a limited application on this kind of reaction.7–10 Therefore, we reasoned that this relative inert substrate could serve as a good starting point to test the feasibility of our hypothesis. To our delight, very simple and cheap catalysts can promote the reaction efficiently. The desired product can be obtained with 91% yield in the presence of 20 mol% of CoCO3 and 5 mol% TFA (trifluoroacetic acid) (Table 1, entry 1). In sharp contrast, in the absence of either CoCO3 or TFA, only very low conversion was observed. These results indicated that CoCO3 and TFA worked cooperatively to generate the product (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). In the presence of TFA, two different cobalt catalysts were tested, as shown in Table 1, the desired hydroacylation product 2a was obtained in 74% and 56% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). However, poor yield was obtained when Co(acac)2 was used as catalyst (Table 1, entry 4).

Table 1 Screening the reaction conditionsa

image file: c4ra05028b-u1.tif

Entry Solvent Lewis acid Yieldb (%)
a Unless otherwise noted, the reactions were carried out with 1a (0.24 mmol, 32.6 mg), diethyl azodicarboxylate (34.8 mg, 0.2 mmol), Lewis acid (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%) and TFA (0.01 mmol, 5 mol%) in the indicated solvent (0.2 mL) for 12 h.b Isolated yield.c 10 mol% CoCO3 was used.d 5 mol% CoCO3 was used.e In the absence of CoCO3.f 1 mol% TFA was used.g Without TFA.
1 CH2Cl2 CoCO3 91
2 CH2Cl2 Co(OAc)2 74
3 CH2Cl2 CoCl2 56
4 CH2Cl2 Co(acac)2 26
5 Toluene CoCO3 85
6 CH3CN CoCO3 88
7 Et2O CoCO3 Complex
8 THF CoCO3 Complex
9 MeOH CoCO3 <5
10c CH2Cl2 CoCO3 93
11d CH2Cl2 CoCO3 64
12e CH2Cl2 CoCO3 <10
13f CH2Cl2 CoCO3 <10
14g CH2Cl2 CoCO3 <10


Next, we investigated the solvent effect. As shown in Table 1, when toluene or CH3CN was used as the solvent, the desired product was obtained with 85% and 88% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). However, complex mixture was observed when Et2O or THF was used as the solvent (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). Poor yield was also obtained when methanol was used as the solvent (Table 1, entry 9).

We further optimized the catalyst loading. When we reduced the loading of CoCO3 from 20 mol% to 10 mol%, there is no effect on the reaction (Table 1, entries 1 and 10). However, when the catalyst loading was further reduced, the yield of 2a decreased dramatically. (Table 1, entry 11). Further optimization of the reaction conditions showed that DCM was the solvent of choice and CoCO3 and TFA were the optimal catalysts. This new cooperative catalysis system showed powerful reactivity since the desired product was obtained with excellent yield only in 12 h while this compound was obtained only in low yield even after 96 h with all the previously reported procedures.7–10

Encouraged by these results, we next probed the scope of this hydroacylation reaction with a variety of aldehydes (Table 2). All reactions were carried out simply by mixing the reactants in a single operation at room temperature to afford the corresponding products 2a–q. To our delight, various aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes could be well tolerated in our optimised reaction system. Different type of aliphatic aldehydes, regardless of steric effect, either linear or branched, gave the desired products in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 8 and 15). Cyclohexanecarbaldehyde is also an excellent partner for this reaction and the desired product was obtained in 94% yield (Table 2, entry 12). The aromatic aldehydes, bearing either electron withdrawing or donating groups in para-, meta-, and ortho-positions, were tolerated as well. Heteroaromatic aldehydes such as thienyl aldehyde could also be successfully employed to afford amide with excellent yield (Table 2, entries 1–7 and 17). The steric effect was observed when aldehydes 1e and 1f were used as substrates which resulted in lower yields (Table 2, entries 5 and 6). The application of cinnamaldehyde as a substrate in the title reaction was also successful albeit with lower yield (Table 2, entry 16).

Table 2 Substrates scopea

image file: c4ra05028b-u2.tif

Entry Aldehyde R Product Yieldb (%)
a Unless otherwise noted, the reactions were carried out with 1 (0.24 mmol), diethyl azodicarboxylate (34.8 mg, 0.2 mmol), CoCO3 (2.4 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) and TFA (0.01 mmol, 5 mol%) in CH2Cl2 (0.2 mL) for 12 h.b Isolated yield.
1 1a 4-MeOC6H4 2a 92
2 1b 4-FC6H4 2b 94
3 1c 3-CH3C6H4 2c 92
4 1d 3-BrC6H4 2d 93
5 1e 2-CH3C6H4 2e 80
6 1f 2-ClC6H4 2f 77
7 1g C6H5 2g 94
8 1h 2-Methyl propyl 2h 96
9 1i Isopropyl 2i 95
10 1j Propyl 2j 96
11 1k tert-Butyl 2k 94
12 1l Cyclohexyl 2l 94
13 1m C6H5(CH2)2 2m 96
14 1n Propenyl 2n 95
15 1o C6H5CH(CH3) 2o 51
16 1p C6H5(CH)2 2p 52
17 1q 2-thienyl 2q 77


Notably, this coupling reaction is also amenable to scale-up. When the reaction was carried out on a 24 mmol scale, the desired product was obtained in 93% yield. Therefore, this method is fast, easy to handle, and adaptable to large scale synthesis (Scheme 1).


image file: c4ra05028b-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Example of scalable synthesis.

Finally, the mechanism of this transformation was studied preliminarily. Under the optimal conditions, no desired product was obtained with using either catalytic amount (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) but also stoichiometric amount (0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) of TEMPO, which indicated that this transformation was likely to involve a radical intermediate (Scheme 2).22 As shown in Fig. 1, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments were then performed in the presence of a mixture of CoCO3, 1h, DEAD and TFA. A strong signal was clearly detected which revealed a free radical of nitrogen was formed. However, In the absence of either CoCO3 or TFA, no signal was detected.23–26


image file: c4ra05028b-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Mechanism study.

image file: c4ra05028b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 EPR experiment in the presence of 1h, diethyl azodicarboxylate, CoCO3 and TFA in CH2Cl2 at room temperature.

image file: c4ra05028b-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism.

Based on these experimental results, we proposed a possible mechanism for the reaction. Initially, an acyl radical I is generated by cobalt catalyst, which then reacts with the Brønsted acid activated intermediate II to form radical III. Finally, intermediate III is trapped by aldehyde to give product 2 and regenerates acyl radical. In this transformation, radical III can be identified by EPR (Scheme 3).27–29

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a new and efficient radical coupling reaction of aldehydes and azodicarboxylates employing the strategy of merging Lewis- and Brønsted- acid catalysis. This powerful reaction system afforded the desired products with broader substrates scope, in shorter reaction time, more efficiently.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the NSFC (21032005, 21172097, 21372105), the National Basic Research Program of China (no. 2010CB833203), the International S&T Cooperation Program of China (2013DFR70580), the National Natural Science Foundation from Gansu Province of China (no. 1204WCGA015), and the “111” program from MOE of P. R. China.

Notes and references

  1. (a) J. Bariwal and E. Van der Eycken, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 9283–9303 RSC; (b) G. Song, F. Wang and X. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3651–3678 RSC; (c) R. J. Lundgren and G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2525–2528 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. M. C. Willis, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 725–748 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. D. A. Colby, R. G. Bergman and J. A. Ellman, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 624–655 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) V. Nair, A. T. Biju, S. C. Mathew and B. P. Babu, Chem.–Asian J., 2008, 3, 810–820 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Vallribera, R. M. Sebastian and A. Shafir, Curr. Org. Chem., 2011, 15, 1539–1577 CrossRef CAS.
  5. T. Kanzian and H. Mayr, Chem.–Eur. J, 2010, 16, 11670–11677 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. R. Huisgen and F. Jakob, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1954, 590, 37–47 CrossRef CAS.
  7. C. H. Jun, E. A. Jo and J. W. Park, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 1869–1881 CrossRef CAS.
  8. V. Chudasama, J. M. Ahern, D. V. Dhokia, R. J. Fitzmaurice and S. Caddick, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3269–3271 RSC.
  9. Q. Zhang, E. Parker, A. D. Headley and B. Ni, Synlett, 2010, 16, 2453–2456 Search PubMed.
  10. B. Ni, Q. Zhang, S. Garre and A. D. Headley, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 875–880 CrossRef CAS.
  11. (a) D. Lee and R. D. Otte, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 3569–3571 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Qin, Q. Peng, J. Song and D. Zhou, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 5880–5883 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) S. M. Inamdar, V. K. More and S. K. Mandal, Chem. Lett., 2012, 41, 1484–1486 CrossRef CAS; (d) V. Chudasama, A. R. Akhbar, K. A. Bahou, R. J. Fitzmaurice and S. Caddick, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 7301–7317 RSC.
  12. (a) J. Parka and S. Hong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 6931–6943 RSC; (b) F. Lv, S. Liu and W. Hu, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2013, 2, 824–836 CrossRef CAS; (c) W. Hu, X. Xu, J. Zhou, W. Liu, H. Huang, J. Hu, L. Yang and L. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7782–7783 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) N. Yamagiwa, H. Qin, S. Matsunaga and M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 13419–13427 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) T. Yang, A. Ferrali, F. Sladojevich, L. Campbell and D. J. Dixon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9140–9141 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, ed. A. de Meijere and F. Diederich, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004 Search PubMed.
  14. Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis, 2nd Ed., ed. M. Beller and C. Bolm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004 Search PubMed.
  15. J. E. Backvall, A. K. Awasthi and Z. D. Renko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 4750–4752 CrossRef.
  16. Y. Katayama, K. Hashimoto, H. Nakayama, H. Mino, M. Nojiri, T. Ono, H. Nyunoya, M. Yohda, K. Takio and M. Odaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 728–729 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. J. A. Kovacs, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 825–848 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. M. Kobayashi and S. Shimizu, Eur. J. Biochem., 1999, 261, 1–9 CrossRef CAS.
  19. I. Ryu, A. Tani, T. Fukuyama, D. Ravelli, S. Montanaro and M. Fagnoni, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 2554–2557 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. J. Kim, J. A. Ashenhurst and M. Movassaghi, Science, 2009, 324, 238–241 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. W. Affo, H. Ohmiya, T. Fujioka, Y. Ikeda, T. Nakamura, H. Yorimitsu, K. Oshima, Y. Imamura, T. Mizuta and K. Miyoshi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8068–8077 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. Z. Huang, L. Jin, Y. Feng, P. Peng, H. Yi and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7151–7155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. (a) B. S. Jaynes and C. L. Hill, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 12212–12213 CrossRef CAS; (b) D. Dondi, A. M. Cardarelli, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 5527–5535 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. D. Tzirakis and M. Orfanopoulos, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 873–876 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) S. Protti, D. Ravelli, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Chem. Commun., 2009, 7351–7353 RSC; (e) D. Dondi, D. Ravelli, M. Fagnoni, M. Mella, A. Molinari, A. Maldotti and A. Albini, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 7949–7957 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. (a) S. Esposti, D. Dondi, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 2531–2534 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. D. Tzirakis and M. Orfanopoulos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4063–4069 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) D. Ravelli, M. Zema, M. Mella, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4158–4164 RSC.
  25. S. Angioni, D. Ravelli, D. Emma, D. Dondi, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 2209–2214 CrossRef CAS.
  26. (a) D. Dondi, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 4153–4163 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. D. Tzirakis and M. Orfanopoulos, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5891–5893 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. D. Tzirakis, M. N. Alberti and M. Orfanopoulos, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8228–8230 RSC; (d) D. Ravelli, A. Albini and M. Fagnoni, Chem.–Eur. J, 2011, 17, 572–579 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) D. Ravelli, S. Montanaro, C. Tomasi, P. Galinetto, E. Quartarone, D. Merli, P. Mustarelli and M. Fagnoni, ChemPlusChem, 2012, 77, 210–216 CrossRef CAS.
  27. J. Wang, C. Liu, J. Yuan and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2256–2259 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. (a) R. R. Ferguson and R. H. Crabtree, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 5503–5510 CrossRef CAS; (b) W. T. Boese and A. S. Goldman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 2119–2122 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Tsunoi, I. Ryu, T. Okuda, M. Tanaka, M. Komatsu and N. Sonoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8692–8701 CrossRef CAS; (d) S. Kato, T. Iwahama, S. Sakaguchi and Y. Ishii, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 222–223 CrossRef CAS; (e) Y. Uenoyama, T. Fukuyama, K. Morimoto, O. Nobuta, H. Nagai and I. Ryu, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2006, 89, 2483–2494 CrossRef CAS . Also see reviews; (f) I. Ryu and N. Sonoda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1996, 35, 1050–1066 CrossRef.
  29. V. Chudasama, R. J. Fitzmaurice and S. Caddick, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 592–596 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and spectra of all new compounds. For EPR spectroscopy data See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra05028b

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.