Selective Zn2+ sensing using a modified bipyridine complex

Mahesh Akulaa, Patrick Z. El-Khouryb, Amit Nag*a and Anupam Bhattacharya*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad-500078, A.P., India. E-mail: anupam@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in; amitnag@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
bPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA

Received 1st February 2014 , Accepted 28th April 2014

First published on 28th April 2014


Abstract

A novel fluorescent Zn2+ sensor, 4-(pyridin-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]quinoline (PPQ), has been designed, synthesized and characterized by various spectroscopic and analytical techniques. PPQ exhibits superior detection of Zn2+ in the presence of various cations tested, including Cd2+ and Hg2+, via shifting its emission maxima and fluorescence intensity enhancement. An emission wavelength at 500 nm, ensures probable non-interference from cellular components while performing biological applications.


Zinc is required by living organisms to optimally perform various life functions: cell-division, growth and even vision.1 Zinc is also known to play a main role in the functioning of the nervous system in the bodies of bilateral animals,2 which is an active research area in neurobiology.3,4 Dynamic pools of loosely bound zinc ions – termed ‘mobile zinc’ – mediate diverse cellular processes in the physiology of living organisms, ranging from signal transduction to proliferation and death due to the immune response.5–8 In spite of such diverse roles, direct spectroscopic detection of Zn2+ is not possible due to its d10 electronic configuration. The sensitivity of fluorescence spectroscopy when compared to other optical tools renders this technique ideal for Zn2+ detection.9 Its widespread use has motivated the development and characterization of catalogues of fluorescent probes which produce readouts specific to this cation. Several chemosensors with wide arrays of structural features are known in the literature for the selective detection of Zn2+.10 For example, bipyridine9b,11 and quinoline based ligands12 are well known in this respect. In fact, quinoline based ligands like N-(6-methoxy-8-quinolyl)-4-toluenesulfonamide [TSQ] have garnered a lot more attention as fluorescent chemosensors for Zn2+.12 In this regard, one of the major challenges has to do with the selectivity of the available probes. Namely, a stringent test of an ideal probe comprises selective Zn2+ detection in the presence of various transition metals.

The generally accepted mechanisms for Zn2+ sensing through fluorescence are photoinduced electron transfer (PET) and intramolecular charge transfer (ICT).10 Most PET sensors detect Zn2+ by fluorescence enhancement, whereas ICT sensors provide more selective ratiometric signals with quantifiable shifts in fluorescence emission maxima. Herein, we embark on a quest to develop sensors which take advantage of both mechanisms. Namely, a wavelength shifted fluorescence response as well as fluorescence enhancement are sought after simultaneously, with an ultimate goal of superior recognition of Zn2+.

With all the aforementioned in mind, we attempted to develop a hybrid quinoline–bipyridine system, 2-(pyridine-2-yl)quinoline [PQ] (Scheme 1), and test its sensitivity and selectivity towards Zn2+. Our initial attempt proved unsuccessful, namely, a complete lack of Zn2+ selectivity was observed when PQ was used as a probe. At this juncture we decided to introduce skeletal modification to the existing PQ structure, by fusing heterocycles on the pyridine half of the quinoline moiety by a 2,3-c mode. The premise was that the introduction of an electron rich system in PQ would allow for the supply of electrons to the electron deficient quinoline. It was also anticipated that attaching heterocycles by the 2,3-c mode would provide an additional site for metal binding. The synthesis of the target molecules was carried out by employing two separate synthetic strategies. The fused pyrrole system, 4-(pyridin-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]quinoline (PPQ) was synthesized using the van Leusen method with toluenesulfonylmethyl isocyanide (TosMIC) as the key step.13 Suzuki coupling14 was used as a key step for the synthesis of furan [4-(pyridin-2-yl)-3H-furo[2,3-c]quinoline] (FPQ) and thiophene [4-(pyridin-2-yl)-3H-thieno[2,3-c] (TPQ) based systems. All the required compounds were obtained in 45–85% yield and were fully characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectroscopy before testing the fluorescence activity of the yielded compounds. Initial steady state fluorescence measurements of FPQ, PPQ and TPQ with respect to Zn2+ detection revealed that only PPQ can selectively detect Zn2+, whereas the other two compounds were optically silent. The most mundane of considerations is the selectivity of PPQ towards Zn2+ binding in the presence of other metals and the binding mode, to which we limit this communication.


image file: c4ra00922c-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Progressive increase in the complexity of the bipyridine structure.

The binding of PPQ towards different metal ions in DMF was investigated with steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (Fig. 1). The PPQ ligand exhibits a fluorescence emission maximum at 400 nm in DMF. As shown in Fig. 1, we observed negligible changes to the fluorescence response of PPQ upon addition of Li+, Na+, Mg2+, K+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Ag+, Cd2+, Hg2+ and Pb2+. In contrast, PPQ shows high selectivity for Zn2+, marked by the emergence of a red shifted fluorescence peak at 500 nm only upon Zn2+ addition. Notably, the fluorescence intensity at 500 nm was enhanced six-fold when compared to PPQ after the addition of only 0.15 equivalents of Zn2+. Also, PPQ can be used as a ratiometric sensor for Zn2+ (Fig. S11), when the fluorescence intensity ratio of 500/400 nm is used as the detecting signal.


image file: c4ra00922c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Fluorescence response (λex = 360 nm) of PPQ in DMF to various metal ions (0.15 equivalents), measured at 500 nm; 1: only PPQ. Inset: the corresponding fluorescence spectra of PPQ alone and in the presence of various metal ions.

To establish the selectivity of the PPQ molecule towards Zn2+, we also performed competitive fluorescence sensing experiments in the presence of other metals (Fig. 2). The observations clearly show that PPQ is highly selective towards the detection of Zn2+ in the presence of most of the other metals. It is noteworthy to mention here that PPQ shows prominent selectivity towards Zn2+, even in presence of Cd2+ or Hg2+, although these ions have similar chemical properties and are expected to interfere with the Zn2+ signals. On the other hand, we observed moderate interference when Co2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ were present in the solution which led to fluorescence quenching. MALDI spectra (Fig. S12–S14) revealed that the aforementioned cations form complexes with PPQ, which possibly result in the decrease of fluorescence intensity.


image file: c4ra00922c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Competitive selectivity (λex = 360 nm and fluorescence was recorded at 500 nm) of PPQ towards Zn2+ in DMF, in the presence of other metal ions (0.15 equivalent). 1: only PPQ.

The binding stoichiometry for the complex formed between PPQ and Zn2+, was established by the continuous variation method (Job's plot), which indicates a 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ligand to metal ratio (Fig. 3). Benesi–Hildebrand analysis15 of the fluorescence titration data gave an association constant of 1.5 ± 0.2 × 102 M−2 for the complex. The detection limit was found to be 1.5 × 10−6 M in DMF, according to a reported method.16 The MALDI spectrum of the complex (Fig. S7) provides further support to the binding pattern. The mass spectrum showed a prominent peak at m/z 553 in the positive ion mode, along with well resolved isotopic peaks at m/z 555 and 557, which confirm the presence of two ligand molecules bound to Zn2+. While these results address questions pertaining to the metal to ligand ratio, they cannot discern between the two possible PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ binding motifs (Fig. 4). In an effort to further validate the proposed structures, and ascertain the participation of the pyrrole and/or quinoline nitrogens along with the pyridine nitrogen (Scheme 1) to zinc binding, we decided to introduce a minor modification to the structure of PPQ. The –NH of the pyrrole was methyl-substituted. Synthesis of the aforementioned compound, namely 3-methyl-4-(pyridine-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]quinolone (N-methyl PPQ), was accomplished by reacting PPQ with methyl iodide in the presence of sodium hydride. The yielded product was again fully characterized before subsequent fluorescence measurements. As expected based on our prior observations, the compound did not exhibit any shift in fluorescence maxima upon addition of Zn2+, indicating a loss of selectivity towards Zn2+. This stresses the crucial role played by the pyrrole nitrogen in selective Zn2+ sensing.


image file: c4ra00922c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Job's plot of PPQ (in DMF) and Zn2+, where concentrations of PPQ and Zn2+ were 10−4 M. λex = 360 nm and fluorescence was recorded at 500 nm. The inset shows the Benesi–Hildebrand analysis of the fluorescence changes for the complexation between PPQ and Zn2+.

image file: c4ra00922c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Two possible complex structures with a 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio of PPQ and Zn2+.

As the dephased radiation process does not provide direct structural information about the yielded complex, we opted to employ IR absorption spectroscopy to further validate our assignments, guided by density functional theory (DFT) for spectral assignments. The IR spectra (Fig. 5) of the PPQ ligand, complex (PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ) and N-methyl PPQ were recorded as KBr discs. The spectra of PPQ exhibited the characteristic N–H stretching vibration at 3370 cm−1. Upon complexation with Zn2+, the N–H peak disappeared, indicating the involvement of the pyrrole nitrogen in complex formation. This is also supported through the absence of a N–H peak in the IR spectrum of N-methyl PPQ. As such, we propose that both the binding motifs (Fig. 4) are possible for the complex. The computed B3LYP17/6-311++G**18 anharmonic IR spectra19 for all the three species corroborate the experimental results, and provide compelling proof for our assignments. On the basis of the above observations, the selective recognition of Zn2+ by the PPQ molecule over a number of other cations is indicative of the fact that the bidentate ligand better satisfies the geometrical requirements of a tetrahedral Zn2+ complex.20 It is obvious that Zn2+ [3d10] shows a preference for tetrahedral geometry as this geometry minimizes ligand–ligand repulsion by maximizing L–M–L angles to 109°.21 This is evident through the inspection of the fully optimized B3LYP/6-311++G** structures of PPQ and PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ (binding mode I of Fig. 4), which are illustrated in Fig. 6.


image file: c4ra00922c-f5.tif
Fig. 5 IR spectra for PPQ, PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ and 2-N-Me PPQ.

image file: c4ra00922c-f6.tif
Fig. 6 The calculated energy minimized structures for PPQ (left) and PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ (right).

The reversibility of Zn2+ binding to PPQ was also tested. The strong affinity of EDTA towards Zn2+ binding, leads to fluorescence quenching, indicative of a decomplexation of the PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ complex (Fig. S8). Subsequent addition of Zn2+ revealed that Zn2+/PPQ binding can be recovered, as evidenced by a rise in the characteristic fluorescence response of the complex.

In conclusion, we have developed a new molecular sensor for the selective detection of Zn2+. The utilized sensor can be easily synthesized by simple chemical transformations. After the addition of Zn2+, a red shift in the emission maxima of the sensor with fluorescence enhancement indicates the involvement of both PET and ICT mechanisms. The stoichiometry of the complex was found to be 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 by Job's plot and MALDI-MS analysis. The molecule senses Zn2+ in the presence of Cd2+/Hg2+, demonstrating its superior ability. Further work is currently underway in our laboratory for the development of water soluble systems of the aforementioned ligand and a crystal structure of the PPQ–Zn2+–PPQ complex.

Acknowledgements

M.A. thanks the University Grants Commission (India) for JRF. P.Z.E acknowledges support from the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program through a Linus Pauling Fellowship at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and an allocation of computing time from the National Science Foundation (TG-CHE130003). A.N. acknowledges support from BITS Pilani through a research initiation grant. A.B. thanks the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India for a fast-track grant. The authors would like to thank Dr Aasheesh Srivastava (IISER, Bhopal) for useful discussions.

References

  1. C. J. Frederickson, J. Y. Koh and A. I. Bush, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2005, 6, 449 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. S. C. Burdette and S. J. Lippard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003, 100, 3605 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. S. C. Burdette and S. J. Lippard, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 216–217, 333 CrossRef CAS.
  4. E. L. Que, D. W. Domaille and C. J. Chang, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 1517 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. S. L. Sensi, P. Paoletti, A. I. Bush and I. Sekler, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2009, 10, 780 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. T. Hirano, M. Murakami, T. Fukada, K. Nishida, S. Yamasaki and T. Suzuki, Adv. Immunol., 2008, 97, 149 CAS.
  7. R. B. Franklin and L. C. Costello, J. Cell. Biochem., 2009, 106, 750 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. E. John, T. C. Laskow, W. J. Buchser, B. R. Pitt, P. H. Basse, L. H. Butterfield, P. Kalinski and M. T. Lotze, J. Transl. Med., 2010, 8, 118 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. (a) K. P. Divya, S. Sreejith, B. Balakrishna, P. Jayamurthy, P. Aneesa and A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6069 RSC; (b) A. Ajayaghosh, P. Carol and S. Sreejith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 14962 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) K. Sarkar, K. Dhara, M. Nandi, P. Roy, A. Bhaumik and P. Banerjee, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2009, 19, 223 CrossRef CAS; (d) R. B. Thompson, B. P. Maliwal and C. A. Fierke, Anal. Chem., 1998, 70, 1749 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) T. Hirano, K. Kikuchi, Y. Urano, T. Higuchi and T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12399 CrossRef CAS; (f) S. C. Burdette, G. K. Walkup, B. Spingler, R. Y. Tsien and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7831 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) K. R. Gee, Z. L. Zhou, D. Ton-That, S. L. Sensi and J. H. Weiss, Cell Calcium, 2002, 31, 245 CrossRef CAS.
  10. Z. Xu, J. Yoon and D. R. Spring, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1996 RSC.
  11. J. V. Mello and N. S. Finney, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1536 CrossRef CAS.
  12. (a) C. J. Frederickson, E. J. Kasarskis, D. Ringo and R. E. Frederickson, J. Neurosci. Methods, 1987, 20, 91 CrossRef CAS; (b) W. S. Xia, R. H. Schmehl and C. J. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5599 CrossRef CAS.
  13. (a) N. D. Smith, D. Huang and N. D. P. Cosford, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 3537 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) F. D. Moliner and C. Hulme, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 1354 CrossRef PubMed; (c) N. P. Pavri and M. L. Trudell, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2649 CrossRef CAS; (d) J. Sisko, A. J. Kassick, M. Mellinger, J. J. Filan, A. Allen and M. A. Olsen, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 1516 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) J. Mendiola, J. M. Minguez, J. Alvarez-Builla and J. J. Varquero, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 3253 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. A. R. Martin and Y. Yang, Acta Chem. Scand., 1993, 47, 221 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. R. R. Avirah, K. Jyothish and D. Ramaiah, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 274 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Y. Ding, Y. Xie, X. Li, J. P. Hill, W. Zhang and W. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5431 RSC.
  17. P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 11623 CrossRef CAS.
  18. M. J. Frisch et al., GAUSSIAN 09 (Revision C.01), Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009 Search PubMed.
  19. (a) J. Bloino and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys., 2012, 136, 124108 CrossRef PubMed; (b) D. Papousek and M. R. Aliev, in Molecular Vibrational Spectra, ed. J. R. Durig, Elsevier, New York, 1982 Search PubMed; (c) S. Califano, in Vibrational States, Wiley, London, 1976 Search PubMed.
  20. (a) G. Parkin, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 699 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) E. Kimura, Pure Appl. Chem., 1993, 65, 355 CrossRef CAS.
  21. G. Parkin, Chem. Commun., 2000, 20, 1971 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra00922c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014