The stereochemistry of two monoterpenoid diastereomers from Ferula dissecta

Zhi-Qiang Wanga, Chao Huanga, Jian Huang*a, Hong-Ying Hanb, Guo-Yu Lib, Jin-Hui Wanga and Tie-Min Sun*a
aKey Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design and Discovery, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Shenyang 110016, PR China. E-mail: suntiemin@126.com; Fax: +86-24-23986398; Tel: +86-24-23986398
bSchool of Pharmacy, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832002, PR China

Received 19th January 2014 , Accepted 7th March 2014

First published on 12th March 2014


Abstract

Two diastereomeric monoterpene benzoates, tschimganin and iso-tschimganin, were isolated from the roots of Ferula dissecta. The absolute stereochemistry of the compounds was determined by chemical-related methods and ab initio calculations of electronic circular dichroism and 13C-NMR shifts. The antitumor activities of the diastereomers were also tested.


Ferula, flowering plants from the family Apiaceae, is native to the Mediterranean region east of central Asia and mostly grows in arid climates. Ferula presents interesting phytochemical features, such as the occurrence of sesquiterpenes1–3 and sesquiterpene coumarins.4–7 As one of the species of Ferula, Ferula dissecta (Ledeb.) Ledeb is distributed mainly in northwest China, such as in Xinjiang,8 and has a long history of application in the treatment of digestive diseases and arthritis in Uygur medicine.9 During our search for structurally unique and biologically interesting natural products,10 two diastereomeric monoterpene benzoates (1 and 2; Fig. 1) were isolated from the roots of F. dissecta collected in Xingjiang, China. Compound 1 was identified as tschimganin by comparison of its spectroscopic data with the literature values, which had previously been isolated from some Ferula species and propolis in Iran and Russia with estrogen-like activity, significant cytoxicity against the MCF-7, HepG2, and MDBK cell lines,11,12 and considerable antimicrobial activities against S. aureus.13 And compound 2 was identified as the diastereomers of tschimganin, iso-tschimganin. Although these compounds have been reported in previous literatures,11–14 their stereochemistry, especially absolute configuration (AC), has not yet been investigated.
image file: c4ra00547c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Chemical structures of 1 and 2.

In this paper, the chemical structures of 1 and 2 as well as their ACs were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic methods, electronic circular dichroism (ECD), and theoretical calculations. Correlations between cotton effects (CEs) and molecular structures were evaluated. Configurational assignments were further confirmed by comparison of the experimental and calculated NMR data. In addition, the experimental ECD curves of 1 and 2 were compared with those of two structural analogs, which were synthesized from commercially available chiral precursors with definite ACs. Finally, the antitumor activities of 1 and 2 were evaluated.

The roots of F. dissecta were collected in Tuoli, Xinjiang, China in June 2007 and identified by Dr Yong Tan (Shihezi University of China). A voucher specimen (no. 20071018001) was deposited in School of Pharmacy, Shihezi University.

Air-dried roots (1.45 kg) of F. dissecta were extracted three times by 95% ethanol after refluxing for 3 h. The combined solutions were concentrated under vacuum to yield an extraction of 240 g. Part of the ethanol extract was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel and eluted with petroleum ether (PE) with increasing amounts of EtOAc to afford Fr. A (PE–EtOAc, 100[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.5, 0.7 g) and Fr. B (PE–EtOAc, 100[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1.5, 0.5 g). Fr. A was then separated by HPLC (H2O–AcCN, 55[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]45) to produce compound 1 (20.0 mg, 126.2 min). Fr. B was also subjected to HPLC (H2O–AcCN, 55[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]45) to produce compound 2 (2, 37.0 mg, 119.2 min).

Compound 1 was isolated as white grease, easily dissolved in chloroform and ethyl acetate. Its IR spectrum indicated the presence of hydroxyl and carbonyl groups at 3437 and 1677 cm−1, respectively. A molecular formula of C18H24O4 was determined by HR-ESI-MS at m/z 305.1750 [M + H]+ (calcd C18H25O4, 305.1753). The 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum of compound 1 showed three aromatic proton signals in an ABX system at δH 7.64 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, H-7′), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-3′), and 6.96 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6′), which were assigned to one 1,3,4-trisubstituted benzene ring, one methoxyl proton at δH 3.95 (3H, s), and three methyl protons of each 3H singlets at δH 0.97, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively. The fact that one ester carbonyl group was connected to the phenyl group was supported by the resonance at δC 166.6 in the 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum and the absorption peak in the IR spectrum at 1677 cm−1, which indicated a conjugated nature. Except for one methoxyl carbon signal at δ 56.1 and seven 3,4-disubstituted benzoyl skeleton signals, ten carbon resonances ascribable to a bornane monoterpene moiety were detected. The methoxyl group at C-4′ was confirmed by HMBC correlations between δH 3.95 and δC 146.2. Correlation of the proton signal at δH 5.08 with the carbonyl carbon at δC 166.6 indicated the location of a benzoyloxy group at C-2. NOESY cross-peaks between H-2 and Me-9 suggested that H-2 and Me-9 were cofacial on the same side of the ring (Fig. 2). Based on the aforementioned analysis and comparison of the spectroscopic data with literature values,12 compound 1 was identified as tschimganin.


image file: c4ra00547c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The key HMBC (a) and NOESY (b) correlations of 1.

Compound 2 was also obtained as white grease, also easily dissolved in chloroform and ethyl acetate. Its IR spectrum indicated the presence of hydroxyl and carbonyl groups at 3366 and 1691 cm−1. The molecular formula of compound 2, C18H24O4, was determined by pseudo-molecular ion peaks at m/z 609.3423 [2M + H]+ (calcd C36H49O8, 609.3427) in the ESI-TOF-MS. The 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum of compound 2 also showed three aromatic proton signals in an ABX system at δH 7.59 (1H, br, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-7′), 7.55 (1H, br, s, H-3′), and 6.93 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6′), one methoxyl proton at δH 3.93 (3H, s), and three methyl protons at δH 1.12, 0.91, and 0.88, respectively. Its 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum showed one methoxyl carbon signal at δC 56.1, seven 3,4-disubstituted benzoyl skeleton signals, and ten carbon resonances ascribable to a bornane monoterpene moiety. Considering its molecular formula, compound 2 was determined to feature the same planar structure as 1. Fig. 3 shows the key NOESY correlations of 2 which suggested that H-2 and Me-9 presented a trans relationship (The detailed NOESY experiments of 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. S7 and S16, respectively). Thus, compound 2 was identified as iso-tschimganin.


image file: c4ra00547c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 The key NOESY correlations of 2.

The stereochemistry assignments of 1 and 2 were determined by ECD and quantum chemical calculations. The experimental ECD of 1 recorded in MeOH (4.86 × 10−4 M) in the 200–300 nm range showed a remarkably negative CE at 218 nm and a weakly negative CE at 232 nm (Fig. 4). The ECD of 2 showed, as expected, a perfect mirror image of 1, two positive CEs at 218 and 232 nm. The ECDs of the two isomers were simulated in the program package Gaussian 09.15 First, conformational searches were performed with the MMFF94 force field by arbitrarily fixing the absolute configuration of C-2 for compounds 1 and 2. Twelve possible conformers of 1 and 2 were found, respectively, and these were fully optimized in methanol at the DFT/B3LYP/TZVP (PCM) level of theory. Three stable low-energy conformations of 1 and 2 were obtained, respectively (shown below). The rotations of single bonds connecting the bornane monoterpene moiety and substituted phenyl ring led to the conformational change.


image file: c4ra00547c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Experimental and calculated ECDs of 1 and 2.

Moreover, the ECD spectra of stable conformers were calculated based on the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) method at the CAM-B3LYP/TZVP level.16,17 The final ECD curves were generated using Boltzmann weighting. Fig. 4 shows the calculated ECDs of 1 and 2 after UV correction of 13 nm. The calculated ECD of 1 showed strong negative CE at 218 nm, similar to that in the experimental spectrum of 1, and the simulated ECD of 2 perfectly mirrored that of 1, again similar to the experiment of 2. Notwithstanding the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental ECD in other spectral ranges, this result supports the assignments of a (1S,2R,4S) AC to 1 and a (1S,2S,4S) AC to 2. In order to get reliable results, TD-DFT/CAM-B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ ECD calculations were also performed for the conformers on DFT/B3LYP/cc-pVDZ input geometries. The calculation model implemented in geometry optimization provided a new conformer distribution (Table S3), yet the Boltzmann-weighted ECD retained the band shapes, showing only a small red shift (Fig. S23a and b). Also the use of different functionals and basis sets in the calculations did not lead to appreciable changes in the ECD curve profile of individual conformers (Fig. S23c).

The origin of the CEs at 218 nm in the experimental ECDs of 1 and 2 could be explained by molecular orbital (MO) analysis at the same level of ECD calculation (Fig. S24). As inferred from the MO analysis, the CE at 218 nm is mainly dominated by transitions from HOMO-1 → LUMO (47%) and HOMO → LUMO (51%), which could be ascribed to the combination of a phenyl ring π → π* transition and a carbonyl group n → π* transition.

In our studies of the relationship between the stereostructures and the CEs, some interesting phenomena were observed and valuable results were obtained. As demonstrated earlier, the Boltzmann-averaged calculated ECD of 1 is a perfect mirror image of 2, similar to the experimental findings. However, the calculated ECDs of individual conformers vary greatly because of conformational changes brought about by rotations of single bonds. Fig. 5 shows the stereostructures of the stable conformers and their calculated ECD spectra. By viewing the conformers along the O–C direction of the carbonyl group, a plane passing through the phenyl ring and the carbonyl group can divide the borneol moiety into two parts. An obvious positive relevance exists between the CE at 218 nm and the upper part of the borneol moiety. The larger part (three methyl groups, a methylene group, and a methylidyne group) of the borneol moiety is located in a lower region in conformer 1a; thus, the calculated ECD displays a negative CE at 218 nm. In contrast to 1a, the upper parts (three methylene groups and a methylidyne group) are larger than the lower parts (only two methyl groups) in the 1b and 1c structures; therefore, positive CEs are observed. The difference in magnitude between 1b and 1c may be due to the methoxy group, which dominates the n → π* transition from the oxygen atom to the phenyl ring. As 1a is the preferred conformation in methanol, occupying the highest Boltzmann population (80%; Table S3) among the conformers, the weighted ECD shows a negative CE at 218 nm, in agreement with the experimental results.


image file: c4ra00547c-f5.tif
Fig. 5 The relative stable conformers of 1 and 2, and their calculated ECDs. The ECDs of conformers 1a and 2a (red lines) are covered by the Boltzmann-averaged curves (cyan lines).

Similar phenomena may be observed in compound 2 (Fig. 5b). The positive CEs in 2a and 2c may be attributed to the fact that the larger part of the molecule (three methyl groups, a methylene group and a methylidyne group) are located above the plane, and the negative CE in 2b is easy to understand in a similar manner. Based on the aforementioned analyses, we presume that any atom or group occupying the space outside the plane may break the symmetry of the molecule and lead to a change in CE. This case is similar to the “octant rule”, a well-known semi-empirical approach for predicting the sign of the CE of the n–π* transition of saturated ketones. However, the octant rule is usually used for saturated cyclic ketones and is not suitable for open chain esters. Our work provides a useful clue for predicting the sign of the CE of open chain esters.

Interest in the use of ab initio prediction of 13C-NMR chemical shifts to aid stereo structural assignment has recently increased.18,19 Considering that some differences between the NMR data of 1 and 2 were observed, we attempted to further confirm the stereochemistry of the chiral molecules by comparing their theoretical NMR shifts with the available experimental data. NMR shifts for the potential structures were calculated by the GIAO method using the optimized parameters obtained from the B3LYP/6-311++G (d,p) level. Table 1 shows the experimental and Boltzmann-averaged calculated 13C-NMR chemical shifts.

Table 1 Experimental and calculated 13C-NMR chemical shifts δ (ppm) of 1 and 2
Position 1 2
δ (calc.)a δ (exp.) δ (calc.) δ (exp.)
a The theoretical chemical shifts were empirically scaled by using the following equations: δscaled = (δcalc − intercept)/slope. Where slope and intercept are obtained from a plot of the calculated data against the experimental data; the purpose of this approach is to remove systematic errors in the shift calculation.
1 54.9 49 53.1 49.1
2 84.4 81.3 83.3 80.3
3 40.7 38.9 38.7 36.9
4 48.7 45.1 46.8 45
5 32.4 27.1 30.2 28.1
6 35.5 33.7 33.2 27.4
7 53.0 47 51.2 47.8
8 10.6 11.6 7.8 13.6
9 18.9 20 16.3 18.9
10 19.6 20.1 17.0 19.7
1′ 172.9 165.8 173.9 166.6
2′ 128.6 123.1 128.6 123.1
3′ 113.9 111.8 113.5 111.7
4′ 152.3 146.2 152.8 146.2
5′ 159.3 149.8 160.0 149.8
6′ 119.1 114.1 118.8 113.9
7′ 133.2 123.9 133.3 123.9
4′-CH3O 54.8 56 53.0 56.1


The trends for the 13C-NMR chemical shifts of C-1–C-4, C-9, and C-10 of compounds 1 and 2 were generally well reproduced. However, some noticeable discrepancies for the group (atoms C-1′, C-4′, and C-5′) were evident. This is most probably attributable to the role of the electron correlation associated with the presence of the lone pairs on the oxygen atoms bonded to each of the three carbon atoms C-1′, C-4′, and C-5′. Notwithstanding the discrepancy, the experimental and calculated shifts were in fact highly linearly correlated (Fig. 6). These findings show that the proposed structures match the authentic structures very well.


image file: c4ra00547c-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Correlations of 13C chemical shifts of 1 and 2.

In our research, we attempted to synthesize 1 and 2 from raw materials with definite configurations but failed because the hydroxyl group attached to the benzene ring was easily oxidized during the synthetic process. Thus, two other stable compounds with closely related structures (1S,2R,4S)-1,7,7-trimethylbi- cyclo [2.2.1]heptan-2-yl-5′-methoxybenzoate (5) and (1S,2S,4S)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl-5′-methoxybenzoate (6) (Scheme 1) were prepared from the commercially available chiral precursors (3 and 4). As 3 and 4 show chiral structures similar to those of 1 and 2, respectively, similar ECD spectral features are expected.


image file: c4ra00547c-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (a) 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]-undec-7-ene (DBU), CH2Cl2, 0 °C for 30 min before 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride was added, then 0 °C for 1 h, 75.5%; (b) DBU, CH2Cl2, 0 °C for 30 min before 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride was added, then 0 °C for 1 h, 80.1%.

The synthesis of 5 and 6 is presented in Scheme 1. Compound 5 was synthesized through acylation of the chiral starting material 3 by 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography to obtain a white solid compound 5.

Compound 6 was synthesized using 4 as a chiral source via a process similar to that used for synthesizing 5. Fig. 7 shows the ECD curves of 1 and 5. A strong resemblance between the ECD curves of 1 and 5 may be observed and both compounds exhibit a negative CE at 218 nm. A remarkable similarity between the ECDs of 2 and 6 was also observed over a wide spectral range.


image file: c4ra00547c-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Comparison of experimental ECDs of 1, 2, 5, and 6.

Based on the above evidence, the complete structure of 1 was determined as (1S,2R,4S)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]-heptan-2-yl-5′-hydroxy-4′-methoxyben-zoate and that of 2 was determined as (1S,2S,4S)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl-5′-hydroxy-4′-methoxyben-zoate.

The growth inhibition effects of 1 and 2 against cervical HeLa cells were investigated. 1 and 2 exhibited different degrees of cytotoxic effects against HeLa cells at 24 h after treatment with IC50 values of 32.1 and 29.1 μM, respectively.

In summary, this communication reports the isolation and structural identification of two natural diastereomeric monoterpene benzoates, tschimganin and iso-tschimganin. The structures of the diastereomers as well as their ACs were determined by comprehensive spectroscopic data, ECD, and quantum chemical calculations. Configurational assignments were further confirmed by the strong correlation between the experimental and calculated 13C-NMR data and the remarkable similarity of ECDs between the isomers and their synthetic analogs. In addition, a useful reference for predicting the sign of the cotton effect (CE) of open chain esters was provided by analyzing the correlation between the stereostructures of individual conformers and their ECDs. The antitumor activities of the compounds were evaluated and significant growth inhibitory activities against cervical cancer HeLa cells were observed.

Acknowledgements

Financial support of this research was provided by the Program for Innovative Research Team of the Ministry of Education, Program for Liaoning Innovative Research Team in University, Key Projects of the National Science and Technology Pillar Program (2012BAI30B02), National Natural Science Foundation (U1170302, 81303270) and Shenyang pharmaceutical university scientific research fund (ZCJJ2013407). The theoretical calculations were conducted on the ScGrid and Deepcomp7000 the Supercomputing Center, Computer Network Information Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Notes and references

  1. G. Appendino, J. Jakupovic, S. Alloatti and M. Ballero, Phytochemistry, 1997, 45, 1639–1643 CrossRef CAS.
  2. K. Kojima, K. Isaka, O. Purev, G. Jargalsaikhan, D. Suran, H. Mizukami and Y. Ogihara, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1999, 47, 690–691 CrossRef CAS.
  3. K. Kojima, K. Isaka, P. Ondognii, O. Zevgeegiino, K. Davgiin, H. Mizukami and Y. Ogihara, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1999, 47, 1145–1147 CrossRef CAS.
  4. R. D. H. Murray, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1989, 6, 591–624 RSC.
  5. A. A. Ahmed, Phytochemistry, 1999, 50, 109–112 CrossRef CAS.
  6. B. N. Su, Y. Takaishi, G. Honda, M. Itoh, Y. Takeda, O. K. Kodzhimatov and O. Ashurmetov, J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 436–440 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. B. N. Su, Y. Takaishi, G. Honda, M. Itoh, Y. Takeda, O. K. Kodzhimatov and O. Ashurmetov, J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 520–522 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. A. G. Gonzalez and J. B. Barrera, Prog. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod., 1995, 64, 1–92 CAS.
  9. Jiangsu New Medical College, Dictionary of Chinese traditional drugs, Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 1988, p. 1174 Search PubMed.
  10. J. Huang, H.-Y. Han, G.-Y. Li, H. Y. Wang, W.-C. Zhang, K. Zhang, Y. Tan, P.-Y. Li and J.-H. Wang, J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res., 2013, 15, 1100–1106 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. S. Sahranavard, F. Naghibi, M. Mosaddegh, S. Esmaeili, P. Sarkhail, M. Taghvaei and S. Ghafari, Res. Pharm. Sci., 2009, 4, 133–137 CAS.
  12. S. S. Nazrullaev, A. I. Saidkhodzhaev, K. S. Akhmedkhodzhaeva, V. N. Syrov, B. F. Rasulev and Z. A. Khushbaktova, Chem. Nat. Compd., 2008, 44, 572–577 CrossRef CAS.
  13. B. Trusheva, I. Todorov, M. Ninova, H. Najdenski, A. Daneshmand and V. Bankova, Chem. Cent. J., 2010, 4, 8 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. K. A. Eshbakova and A. I. Saidkhodzhaev, Chem. Nat. Compd., 2003, 39, 221–222 CrossRef CAS.
  15. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2010 Search PubMed.
  16. G. Giuseppe Mazzeo, E. Santoro, A. Andolfi, A. Cimmino, P. Troselj, A. G. Petrovic, S. Superchi, A. Evidente and N. Berova, J. Nat. Prod., 2013, 76, 588–599 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. A. Evidente, S. Superchi, A. Cimmino, G. Mazzeo, L. Mugnai, D. Rubiales, A. Andolfi and A.-M. Villegas-Fernández, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 5564–5570 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. S. D. Rychnovsky, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2895–2898 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. K. C. Nicolaou and M. O. Frederick, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5278–5282 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed description of the experimental procedures, a listing of UV, IR, HR-EI-MS, NMR spectra, ECDs, computational details and synthetic process. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra00547c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.