S. Abbaspoor,
F. Abbasi* and
S. Agbolaghi
Institute of Polymeric Materials, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran. E-mail: f.abbasi@sut.ac.ir
First published on 12th March 2014
Polymer mixed-brushes with predetermined morphologies as well as with uniform chain length and chain length distribution of various brushes were prepared on a substrate via single crystal surface patterning with a self-seeding procedure from a dilute solution. The required materials including poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polystyrene (PEG-b-PS) and poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEG-b-PMMA) with the same crystalline block molecular weight and different amorphous block molecular weights were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Based on various qualities of the employed solvent and various interactions of the substrate with amorphous blocks, the matrix (PS)-dispersed (PMMA) morphologies were obtained on PEG single crystals. The matrix and dispersed phase regions were detectable by atomic force microscopy (AFM) due to differences in height and stiffness. The domain size of dispersed phase decreased with an increase in the molecular weights of PS and PMMA blocks because hindrance against the presence of PEG-b-PMMA chains increased. Despite the domain size of the dispersed phase ranging from 286 to 351 nm, the crystallization temperature did not have a significant effect on the domain size. By increasing the crystallization temperature, the thickness enhancement, and consequently the tethering density enhancement, was more considerable for PS regions, which can be attributed to the lower osmotic pressure of PS chains. Finally, we grew epitaxial structures consisting of PEG-b-PS, PEG-b-PMMA, and homo-PEG layers to verify the determined thicknesses from mixed-brush systems through the conjunction thickness of the corresponding copolymer and homopolymer crystals.
In our novel approach, mixed-brush single crystals were grown from a dilute solution including two amorphous-crystalline diblock copolymer chains with the same crystalline block. Our surface patterning was random, resembling that of leopard skin. We had access to true control of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-dispersed domain (playing the role of spread patches) size in the PS-matrix, but the population of the PMMA domains was not predictable on a given surface area of a single crystal. In this work, we have employed the materials [poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polystyrene (PEG-b-PS)/poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEG-b-PMMA)] with a weight ratio of 50/50. Furthermore, the lateral habit of grown single crystals was investigated elsewhere.41
Here, the main reason for selecting the PS and PMMA amorphous blocks was their different compatibilities with the PEG crystalline block. Upon constructing the PEG substrate, although its interaction with PMMA brushes is attractive, the PS-tethered chains are repulsed from the substrate surface.40 The other reason is associated with the quality of applied solvent at growth conditions. Although at adopted conditions, amyl acetate is a very good solvent for PS blocks, it is a partially poor solvent for PMMA blocks,39,42–44 which is why we were able to design the matrix-dispersed surface morphologies during the growth of single crystals from the aforementioned diblock copolymer chains. This method could be referred to as a type of single crystal surface patterning. In this leopard skin-like pattern, patches are constructed of PMMA brushes, which are reluctant to abandon the PEG substrate surface, and the skin itself is formed of stretched PS-tethered chains. We used bulk atactic densities of PMMA and PS to perform our calculations.44,45 It is noteworthy that the constructed mixed-brush surface morphologies did not require detection of a selective solvent. As PMMA and PS amorphous blocks have different hardness values,38,46,47 the detection of phase regions on a single crystal substrate was possible.
Fabrication of epitaxial nanostructures from various amorphous-crystalline diblock copolymers including PEG-b-PS, PEG-b-PMMA, and homo-PEG chains was the last issue tackled in this work. In addition to having chemical and geometric recognition applications,42 channel-wire arrays have been employed in this work to verify the corresponding thicknesses of substrates in different phase regions of single crystals with mixed-brush surface morphologies. To grow the epitaxial structures, PEG5000-b-PS4600 single crystals, which exhibited the least hindrance against the growth of subsequent layers, were used as the innermost crystals. Through the growth of the homo-PEG layer, we obtained the sublayer thickness of the region covered by PS (n = 4600 g mol−1) tethered chains by using the conjunction thickness between the PEG-b-PS and homo-PEG single crystal. Afterward, the PEG-b-PMMA and homo-PEG layers were grown to acquire the substrate thicknesses of surface areas covered by the PMMA-grafted chains via the corresponding conjunction thickness.
Sample | n (g mol−1) | PEGn (g mol−1) | AMORPHn (g mol−1) | w/n |
---|---|---|---|---|
Homo-PEG5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 0 | 1.06 |
PEG5000-b-PS4600 | 9600 | 5000 | 4600 | 1.13 |
PEG5000-b-PS10000 | 15000 | 5000 | 10000 | 1.15 |
PEG5000-b-PS14800 | 19800 | 5000 | 14800 | 1.16 |
PEG5000-b-PMMA8700 | 13700 | 5000 | 8700 | 1.19 |
PEG5000-b-PMMA13100 | 18100 | 5000 | 13100 | 1.21 |
PEG5000-b-PMMA17100 | 22100 | 5000 | 17100 | 1.20 |
Solution crystallization was conducted with a dilute concentration of 0.018 wt% (wt/wt of PEG-b-PS/PEG-b-PMMA was 50/50) in amyl acetate (Merck, >98%). The sample was put into a cell tube containing solvent. The tube was then sealed and heated to a temperature greater than that of the dissolution of the sample in the solvent (Td = 65 °C) in a temperature-controllable oil bath and was maintained for approximately 10–15 min to erase the thermal history and to reach a homogeneous solution. The cell tube was then transferred to another bath at −10 °C and kept for 5–6 h for fast crystallization and was then immersed into a given self-seeding temperature oil bath (Ts = 41 °C for all samples) and kept for 20 min. The cell tube was then quickly transferred into an isothermal oil bath at the desired crystallization temperature and was maintained for two to three days.
To fabricate the epitaxial structures, single crystals of diblock copolymers at a solute concentration of 0.009 wt% were grown in a similar manner. After complete crystallization of the diblock copolymers (or homopolymers), a few drops of the sample containing the copolymer (or homopolymer) single-crystal seeds were added to the homogeneous solution of the homopolymer (or copolymer) which had been kept in the same crystallization oil bath. In experiments of epitaxial growth, the exact amount of transferred seeds was not clear. However, the population changed from one sample to another. The various lateral sizes of channels proved our claim that wider channels relate to a lower transferred population of seeds. Nevertheless, in terms of volume, we transferred 0.7 ml of solution containing seeds in each stage. The homogeneous homopolymer (or copolymer) solution was prepared by heating the mixture of the homopolymer (or copolymer) and the solvent to 65 °C for 20 min. The solution was then quickly transferred to the crystallization oil bath (at a preset Tc) for approximately 10 min to reach thermal equilibrium before adding the diblock (or homopolymer) single-crystal seeds. During this period, no crystals were detected. The homopolymer (or copolymer) crystals then grew on the diblock copolymer (or homopolymer) single-crystal seeds to form composite single crystals.
Such a distribution for polymer mixed-brushes can be attributed to two main reasons. The first is the different conformations of PS and PMMA amorphous blocks in amyl acetate. The applied solvent at growth conditions of 23–32 °C could be considered a partially poor solvent for the PMMA block, whereas it is a very good solvent for the PS block.42–44 Therefore, the PS chains are more extended than those of PMMA. The mentioned conformation for PS blocks may cause PEG-b-PS chains to be included into the single-crystal structure more conveniently, which is why the surface areas composed of the PS-tethered chains construct the matrix phase. Second, as stated previously, the interaction of the substrate surface with PMMA grafted chains is attractive and that with PS grafted chains is repulsive. Hence, the PMMA grafted PMMA tend to be attracted to the substrate surface, which subsequently increases the segmental density in its vicinity. On the contrary, the PS chains are repulsed from the surface to reach more extended conformations. The PMMA chains possess a somewhat packed pancake shape conformation; therefore, their hindrance against the chains with the same blocks is significantly high. Due to compatibility of PMMA chains with PEG crystalline blocks61 and their more coiled conformations, the tethered PS chains treat them like homo-PEG chains, which enables these chains to enter the single crystal structure. Moreover, for high hindrance of PMMA grafted chains, the phase regions constructed with them could contribute only to small spread patches.
From a macroscopic perspective, PMMA is harder than PS on the basis of Rockwell hardness (M80–M105 for PMMA and M65–M85 for PS).38,46 From a microscopic perspective, the depth of a static indentation for an AFM tip penetrating PS regions is approximately 5 nm, whereas that penetrating PMMA domains is less than 1 nm.38,47 Therefore, the opaque phases are PMMA-dispersed.
In some samples, the height variance between the matrix and dispersed phases was very low. Hence, the hardness variances could be considered as a determinant parameter in detection. Fig. 2(a) depicts the PEG5000-b-PS4600/PEG5000-b-PMMA17100 mixed-brush morphology constructed at Tc = 23 °C. The height variance between the matrix and dispersed phase regions is equal to 1.9 nm. Here, the PMMA-dispersed domains are blurred significantly in comparison with the matrix phase constructed with PS grafted chains on the substrate. Similarly, the corresponding morphology of the PEG5000-b-PS10000/PEG5000-b-PMMA13100 mixed-brush single crystal constructed at Tc = 30 °C, shown in Fig. 2(b), has a height variance of 5.7 nm. By increasing the height variance, the clarity of images increases. Fig. 2(c) is related to the surface morphology of the PEG5000-b-PS14800/PEG5000-b-PMMA17100 mixed-brush single crystal in which the height variance is equal to 6.7 nm. It appears that the last morphology has a higher resolution due to its elevated height variance between the matrix and dispersed phases.
The escalation of osmotic pressure, which is exerted by a tethered chain on the surface of a single crystal substrate to enable its required surface area to be expanded, results from the need of amorphous chains to expand their coverage surface area. This reaction causes the substrate to decrease its thickness. Through this process, the folding number of crystalline chains is increased and the tethered chains on the substrate surface become distant from each other.62–66 Explanations for alterations of PS molecular weights are reported in Table S1† and Fig. 3.
By increasing MPSn while PMMA features are kept constant, the clarity of images is intensified because the height variance between PS-matrix and PMMA-dispersed phase regions increases. These processes are graphically depicted in Fig. 2(c) and 3(a). Here, the colour variance is important for identifying the various phase regions. Moreover, the features of each phase region affect only the respective thickness and tethering density. Keeping all other influencing parameters at a certain condition and changing the molecular weight of the amorphous block of PS as a type, only the overall thickness and tethering density of PS-covered areas undergo the related alterations. This relation satisfies the condition of corresponding PMMA systems as well, which is discussed in the following section. At Tc = 23 °C, the molecular weight of PS changed from 10000 to 14800 g mol−1, whereas that of PMMA was constant at 17100 g mol−1; the total thickness varied from 16.4 to 18.4 nm; and the respective tethering densities changed from 0.37 to 0.30 nm−2 (Table S1†). Therefore, the thickness (12.3 nm) and tethering density (0.20 nm−2) of the PMMA regions have remained constant. These results are graphically illustrated in Fig. 3(a) and tabulated in Table S1.† The thickness and tethering density of the PMMA domains do not change with changes in the molecular weight of the PS brushes. For example, when the molecular weight of PS was changed from 4600 to 10000 g mol−1 while that of PMMA was fixed at 13100 g mol−1 at Tc = 23 °C, the thickness and tethering density of PMMA domains were equal to 11.2 nm and 0.22 nm−2, respectively (Table S1†).
Domain size is defined by calculating the average of the longest and shortest lines, which connect two points on the perimeter of each domain. Regarding percentages, the somewhat insignificant tolerances from the respective average dispersed domain size are reported in all data Table S1–S3†. By increasing the PS molecular weight, the hindrance against the absorption of PEG-b-PMMA chains into the single crystal structure increases; thus, the PMMA-dispersed phase size reduces. This effect could be associated with the PS's intensified hindrance against the PMMA chains. Table S1† represents the trend of PMMA dispersed domain size changes with respect to variation of PS amorphous block molecular weights, where the molecular weights of PMMA blocks are constant, at the same growth conditions of self-seeding, crystallization temperatures and solvent quality. At Tc = 23 °C, raising the molecular weight of PS from 4600 to 10000 and finally to 14800 g mol−1 while fixing the molecular weight of PMMA at 17100 g mol−1, the domain size of dispersed phase decreased gradually from 302 to 295 to 286 nm. This trend is shown in Fig. 3(b). The tethering density (σ) and crystalline substrate thickness (dCRYST) can be determined from eqn (1) and (2), respectively.39,42,43
(1) |
(2) |
With an increase in MPMMAn while all other parameters, especially the PS block molecular weight, were constant, the domain sizes of PMMA dispersed patches decreased. This trend could be attributed to the increase in hindrance of PMMA tethered chains. The increase in MPMMAn caused the tethered chains on the substrate surface to need more area to cover. This not only affects the PMMA brushes conformation but also reduces the probability of PEG-b-PMMA chain presence in the single crystal structure. Table S2† shows the trend of MPMMAn variation for constant MPSn. Increasing the molecular weight of the PMMA block from 8700 to 13100 and subsequently to 17100 g mol−1, where MPSn was equal to 4600 g mol−1 at Tc = 23 °C, the respective domain sizes of the dispersed phase reduced from 350 to 324 to 302 nm, respectively (Fig. 4(b)).
An interesting point is that the heights of the PMMA tethered chains are less than the corresponding heights of the PS brushes. This trend is satisfied even when the molecular weight of the PMMA brushes is considerably higher than that of the PS brushes (17100 g mol−1 vs. 4600 g mol−1). As described, this effect could be associated with the solvent quality and interactions with the substrate surface. In PEG5000-b-PS4600/PEG5000-b-PMMA17100 mixed-brush single crystals at Tc = 23 °C, despite having higher molecular weight, the height of the PMMA brushes was lower (12.3 vs. 14.2 nm).
The effect of PMMA block molecular weight on the dispersed domain size deduction was more intensified. At Tc = 23 °C, when the molecular weight of the PS block was changed from 4600 to 10000 g mol−1 while that of PMMA was fixed at 13100 g mol−1, the domain size of the dispersed phase decreased from 324 to 316 nm (Fig. 3(b)). In contrast to this smooth reducing trend, at the same Tc when MPMMAn was increased from 8700 to 13100 g mol−1 while that of PS was constant (=4600 g mol−1), the domain size of PMMA dispersed phase decreased from 350 to 324 nm (Fig. 4(b)). In the latter sample, even though the hindrance of the PS chains was minimum (MPSn = 4600 g mol−1), the dispersed domain size reduction with escalating PMMA molecular weight was significant and can be attributed to the prevalent influence of the conformation of PMMA tethered chains. This comparison can be drawn from the slope of graphs of domain size vs. amorphous block molecular weight (Fig. 3(b) and 4(b)).
(3) |
This equation indicates that the effective parameters for ΔTundercooling are dissolution temperature (Td) and Tc. Moreover, the thickness enhancement of the crystalline substrate could be related to the tendency of PEG chains to reach to the more stretched state (to reduce the free energy via Tc increase59). With an increase in the crystalline substrate thickness and tethered chains approaching each other, the number of tethered chains per surface area rises. The trends of thicknesses and tethering densities related to the PMMA and PS phase regions for mixed-brush surface morphologies are reported in Table S3.† By elevating the crystallization temperature, both substrate and amorphous layer heights in the PS-matrix increase more than those in the PMMA-dispersed phase. The greater increase in thickness of the crystalline substrate beneath the PS tethered chains is due to lower osmotic pressure exerted with PS chains in comparison to PMMA chains. To prove that the osmotic pressure of PS tethered chains is less than that of PMMA grafted ones, we consider two different systems. One includes PEG-b-PS diblock copolymers with the highest molecular weight of PS in amyl acetate, which is a very good solvent for PS, whereas the other includes PEG-b-PMMA diblock copolymers with the least molecular weight of PMMA in a partially poor solvent. We compared the gyration radii of PS with n = 7700 g mol−1 in a very good solvent (=3.7 nm)37 and PMMA with n = 7800 g mol−1 in a nearly good solvent (=3.4 nm)40 with data of our growth system. In this work, the applied solvent, amyl acetate, is partially poor for PMMA, and the corresponding molecular weight of its block is significantly less than that of the PS block. Therefore, the gyration radius of PS is higher than that of PMMA. Conducting experiments with more scrutiny revealed that at the same growth conditions, the substrate thickness of the PMMA-covered single crystal is considerably less than the corresponding thickness of the PS-covered substrate. Therefore, the impact of attractive interaction between PMMA chains and the single crystal substrate is a dominant parameter affecting the substrate thickness. We speculate that the mentioned interaction could in turn have the most significant effect on the exerted osmotic pressure of chains and substrate thickness as well. As mentioned previously, alteration of the amorphous block molecular weight affects only the thickness and tethering density of that region. Therefore, we are able to make a comparison between the thickness of the PS region in PEG5000-b-PS14800/PEG5000-b-PMMA17100 and that of the PMMA region in PEG5000-b-PS4600/PEG5000-b-PMMA8700 mixed-brush single crystals at Tc = 23 °C. To exemplify the presented explanations, the thickness of the substrate beneath the PS (n = 14800 g mol−1) brushes is 4.0 nm, whereas that of PMMA (n = 8700 g mol−1) brushes is 3.5 nm.
Actually, two main reasons can be presented for the significant enhancement of the PS amorphous layer height. First, the increase of substrate thickness in PS growth systems is more than that of PMMA systems. Hence, the tethering density will increase significantly more in PS single crystals than in PMMA single crystals. Therefore, the steric repulsion between PS tethered chains increases significantly and consequently the chains tend to attain a more stretched conformation. In other words, due to the repulsive interaction of PS-grafted chains with the substrate surface, they are allowed to be freely stretched and move away from the surface. If we consider all previously mentioned effective parameters, we can conclude that via enhancement of crystallization temperature, the variance between PMMA and PS phase regions increases (Fig. 5(a)) and, consequently, the clarity of height images to distinguish the various phases increases. For mixed-brush morphologies created from PEG5000-b-PS10000/PEG5000-b-PMMA13100, through changing the crystallization temperature from 23 to 30 °C, the PS phase thickness changed from 16.4 to 18.2 nm, whereas the thickness of the PMMA dispersed phase increased from 11.2 to 12.5 nm (Table S3†). Another example is graphically illustrated in Fig. 5(a) for the PEG5000-b-PS4600/PEG5000-b-PMMA8700 single crystal.
Considering the data reported in Table S3,† the domain sizes of the PMMA-dispersed phase in the PS-matrix do not change via crystallization temperature alteration, which could be related to the consistency of effective parameters for the dispersed domain sizes (i.e., the molecular weight of PS and PMMA amorphous blocks).
For example, in mixed-brush morphologies created from PEG5000-b-PS14800/PEG5000-b-PMMA17100, by changing the crystallization temperature from 23 to 30 °C, the dispersed domain size was fixed to some extent at 286 nm (Fig. 5(b)). This trend satisfied the conditions for other samples as well.
Regarding the conjunction thickness between the copolymer and homopolymer crystals, which is achievable from the height profile, we were able to verify the calculated crystalline substrate thickness in single crystals with matrix-dispersed surface morphology. When the crystals were deposited onto the surface of a hard silicon wafer for AFM analysis, the homo-PEG single crystals slipped down to the silicon surface for the gravity effect (Fig. 6(b)). Here, the thicknesses achieved at the conjunctions of the copolymer seeds are a direct measure of dPEG. The calculated thicknesses of the PMMA and the PS phases in the mixed-brush single crystals are consistent with the achieved thicknesses from respective layers of epitaxial structures. For example, considering the data of Table S3† and Fig. 6, it could be understood that in the mixed-brush single crystal of PEG5000-b-PS4600/PEG5000-b-PMMA8700, the calculated thicknesses of the PS and PMMA regions are equal to 7.7 and 4.0 nm, respectively. It is interesting to note that the corresponding achieved substrate thicknesses from the epitaxial structure for PS- and PMMA-covered areas are the same (i.e., 7.7 and 4.0 nm).
Moreover, this consistency indicates that our primary hypotheses for PS, PMMA, and PEG are completely valid. In this case, we used the bulk density of atactic PS and PMMA blocks for their respective tethered chains, and we ignored the bulk density of amorphous PEG.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra00086b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |