Hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays grown on Ni foam as electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors

Zhenyu Wang, Yuefei Zhang*, Yonghe Li and Haoyu Fu
Institute of Microstructure and Property of Advanced Materials, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P. R. China. E-mail: yfzhang@bjut.edu.cn

Received 3rd December 2013 , Accepted 17th April 2014

First published on 17th April 2014


Abstract

A novel hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss array directly grown on Ni foam is successfully synthesized through a facile hydrothermal method combined with a thermal treatment. When used as the electrode material for supercapacitors, an areal capacitance of 2.1 F cm−2 was obtained under a current density of 2 mA cm−2. After 4000 charge–discharge cycles, a high areal capacitance retention of 88% could be achieved. The outstanding electrochemical performance was attributed to the novel structure of the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays and the Ni foam used as the current collector. The novel hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays are a promising electrode material for supercapacitors.


Introduction

To meet the increasing demand for energy, tremendous research efforts have been made to develop clean and renewable energy sources.1–5 In recent years, supercapacitors, also called electrochemical capacitors or ultracapacitors, have attracted considerable interest as energy-storage devices due to the advantages of high power density, fast charge–discharge process and long life span.3,6,7 According to the energy storage mechanism, supercapacitors can be classified into two types, the electrical double-layer capacitors dominated by electrostatic charge diffusion and accumulation at the interface of the electrode/electrolyte, and the pseudocapacitors governed by Faradaic reactions at the surface of electrode materials. Comparing with conventional energy-storage devices, supercapacitors possess quite a few desirable properties, including charging within seconds, long-term cycling stability and the ability to deliver up to ten times more power than batteries. These features are desirable for a range of applications.

Many materials have been investigated as electrode materials for supercapacitors, including carbon-based materials,7–10 conducting polymers,11,12 and both noble and transition metal oxides.13–17 Transition metal oxides such as NiO,18–20 Fe2O3,21 CuO,22 MnO2,23,24 Co3O4,25,26 NixCo3−xO4 (0 < x < 3)27–31 have attracted tremendous research interest due to the low cost, high energy density, and environmental friendliness. Among the explored materials for supercapacitors, the ternary nickel cobaltite (NiCo2O4) has been investigated as one of the most promising candidates. Comparing with binary nickel oxide (NiO) and cobaltosic oxide (Co3O4), the ternary nickel cobaltite (NiCo2O4) possesses higher theoretical capacity, better conductivity and electrochemical activity.27,32 In recent years, establishment of intriguing architectures for supercapacitor electrode is considered as a necessary factor to boost the electrochemical performance. Furthermore, the method of growing nanostructures on various conductive substrate to fabricate binder-free integrated electrodes for supercapacitors could solve the “dead surface” problems.15,27,32,33 Therefore, the NiCo2O4 binder-free integrated electrode would have a promising application for supercapacitors.

In this report, a novel hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays directly grown on Ni foam is synthesized via a facile one-step hydrothermal method combined with a post thermal treatment, which can be fabricated as a binder-free electrode for supercapacitors. Such integrated electrode exhibits a high areal capacitance and excellent cycling stability even at a high charge–discharge current density.

Experimental

The porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays were fabricated aligned on the Ni foam via a one-step hydrothermal method combined with a post thermal treatment. The reagents used in the experiment were of analytical grade and used without further purification. The Ni foam was carefully cleaned by 3 M HCl in order to remove the NiO layer, and then washed thoroughly with deionized water and absolute ethanol for 20 min each. In a typical procedure,34,35 0.384 g of Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 0.192 g of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and 1.204 g of urea, 0.296 g of NH4F were dissolved in 40 ml of deionized water and stirred to form a homogeneous pink solution. Then the aqueous solution and the Ni foam (1 × 2 cm2 in area, the top of the Ni foam about 1 × 1 cm2 in area was protected from solution contamination by uniformly coating the top with a polytetrafluoroethylene tape) were transferred to a 50 ml Teflon-lined stainless autoclave, and maintained at 120 °C for 6 h. After it was cooled down to room temperature, the red thin product on Ni foam was obtained and subsequently washed with deionized water, ethanol for 5 minutes respectively, and dried at 80 °C for 6 h, then calcined at 300 °C in air for 2 h.

To address and confirm the characterization of NiCo2O4, the structure of the synthesized products were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker D8 discover) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). The morphology and particles size were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI, Quanta 250), transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL, JEM-2010) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system, high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM; JEOL, JEM-2010 F). To calculate the mass loading on the Ni foam accurately, the ICP atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) was applied in the experiment (ESI).

A typical three-electrode cell (equipped with a working electrode, a platinum foil counter electrode, and a Hg/HgO electrode as the reference electrode) was used for measuring the electrochemical properties of the working electrode. And the electrochemical measurements were carried out in 6 M KOH electrolyte. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were studied on an electrochemical workstation (PARSTAT, 2273), galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) was tested by Land (LandCT-2001A). Areal and specific capacitances were calculated using eqn (1) and (2), respectively.

 
Ca = I × Δt/(S × ΔV) (1)
 
Csp = I × Δt/(m × ΔV) (2)
where I (mA) represents the constant discharge current, m (mg), ΔV (V) and Δt (s) designate the mass loading of active materials, potential drop during discharge and total discharge time, respectively. S is the active area of the electrode.

Results and discussion

Morphology and structural analysis

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays are shown in Fig. 1. As can be seen, the nanograss arrays are uniformly grown on the skeleton of Ni foam (Fig. 1a and b). The higher magnification SEM images (Fig. 1c and d) show that the products exhibit grass-like structure with the surface consists of many needlelike nanowires grown on the nanosheets of below. Furthermore, the nanosheets connect each other and grow aligned on the substrate. And a cluster of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss array is about 2 × 2 μm2. The average length and diameter of the surface nanowires is about 2 μm and 50–100 nm respectively. It is expected that the special structure might have large surface area and high capacitance due to the hierarchical nanograss arrays, which would facilitate the access of electrolytes to active material of the electrode.
image file: c3ra47243d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 SEM images of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays on Ni foam.

The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images are shown in Fig. 2, which demonstrate the microstructures information about NiCo2O4. Fig. 2a shows the full view of a single hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss array. As can be seen, the nanograss array consists of nanosheet below and nanowires grown on the nanosheet. A typical selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset of a) is used to indicate the polycrystalline structure of the NiCo2O4 nanograss, the well-defined diffraction rings can be readily indexed to the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (400), which is consistent with the XRD results (Fig. S1, ESI). Fig. 2b reveals that an individual NiCo2O4 nanowire consists of numerous interconnected nanoparticles forming a porous structure. The crystalline NiCo2O4 nanoparticles have a size of 10 nm in diameter. Fig. 2c shows the corresponding HRTEM image of the selected area marked in Fig. 2b, which shows the lattice fringes with interplane spacings of 0.286 nm, corresponding to the (220) plane of spinel NiCo2O4 material. Furthermore, the nanopores can be seen in the inter-particle with a size of 1–5 nm, which will facilitate the electrolyte transport and contact with the active material. The corresponding result of EDS microanalysis is shown in Fig. 2d. It is found that the nanograss consists of Ni, Co, and O elements, indicating the formation of pure NiCo2O4 further.


image file: c3ra47243d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) and (b) TEM images of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays. Inset shows the SAED pattern; (c) HRTEM image of NiCo2O4 nanowire of (b); (d) EDS result of the nanograss arrays.

To explore the evolution details of the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays on Ni foam, SEM characterization was performed at different reaction stages, as shown in Fig. 3. After reaction for 1 h, the Ni foam was uniformly covered with a layer of nanosheets. However, with further increasing reaction time, after about 3 hours, the morphology changed, nanowires with the length of 0.5–1 μm grown vertically on the nanosheets, which could be imagined the grass grew from the earth. After about 6 hours, the nanowires had grown longer with the length of 2 μm, which formed the main nanograss morphology. Furthermore, it can be seen that the nanograss was supported uniformly on the Ni foam and interconnected with each other, forming an intricate network system, which could enhance the ions transmission efficiency and the electronic conductivity of electrode.


image file: c3ra47243d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Evolution details of the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays at different reaction stages. (a) and (b) 1 h; (c) and (d) 3 h; (e) and (f) 6 h; (g) schematic illustration of the evolution of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays on Ni foam.

Electrochemical analysis

Fig. 4 shows electrochemical performance of the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays supported on Ni foam. Fig. 4a presents the typical cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays in a 6 M KOH electrolyte at various scan rates ranging from 1 to 20 mV s−1. The shape of the CV curves clearly reveal the pseudocapacitive characteristics derived from Faradaic reactions. Specifically, two typical redox peaks are observed in the CV cures, which is mainly attributed to the Faradaic redox reactions related to M–O/M–O–OH (M represents Ni or Co) associated with OH anions. The redox reactions in the alkaline electrolyte are expressed as follows,27,28,32
 
NiCo2O4 + OH + H2O ↔ NiOOH + 2CoOOH + e (3)
 
CoOOH + OH ↔ CoO2 + H2O + e (4)

image file: c3ra47243d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) CV curves at various scan rates; (b) discharge plots at different currents density; (c) areal capacitance retention rate as a function of the current density and the coulombic efficiency; (d) cycling performance of the electrode.

Apparently, with the 20-fold increase in the sweep rate from 1 to 20 mV s−1, the current density increases simultaneously, and all curves exhibit a similar shape without obvious polarization, revealing the Ni foam substrate could ensure the good electric conductivity of the electrode, which is verified by the EIS measurement (Fig. S2, ESI).32,36

Galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) measurements were carried out in a 6 M KOH electrolyte between 0 and 0.475 V (vs. Hg/HgO) at various current densities ranging from 1.3 to 19.5 mA cm−2, as shown in Fig. 4b. The voltage plateaus at around 0.3 V in the GCD curves indicate the existence of faradaic processes, which is consistent with the CV curves. With the increasing of current density, the GCD curves still hold excellent symmetry, without obvious IR drop, indicating the outstanding electrochemical reversibility.

To further evaluate the application potential of the hybrid structure as an electrode for supercapacitors, the rate capability and coulombic efficiency have been tested. The areal capacitance (the capacitance per unit area) and specific capacitance (the capacitance per unit mass) calculated by eqn (1) and (2) of the experiment section. Encouragingly, the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays electrode exhibits excellent performance of rate capability with the areal capacitance of 2.14, 2.1, 2.04, 1.98, 1.91, 1.89, 1.84, 1.73, 1.7, 1.6 F cm−2 (972, 954, 927, 900, 868, 859, 836, 786, 772, 727 F g−1) at various current densities of 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 20, 25, 30 mA cm−2 respectively. This suggests that about 74.7% of the areal capacitance is still retained when the charge–discharge rate is increased from 1 to 30 mA cm−2. These results are remarkable compared to the previously reported values NiCo2O4-based electrodes. For example, Wang and co-workers obtained a specific capacitance of 294 F g−1 at a low discharge current density of 1 A g−1 for NiCo2O4 nanoplates electrode,37 Tu and co-workers developed the porous NiCo2O4 hetero-structure array and obtained a specific capacitance of 891 F g−1 at a discharge current density of 1 A g−1,38 Li and co-workers demonstrated a simple and scalable strategy for synthesizing hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanowires which exhibited a high specific capacitance of 743 F g−1 at 1 A g−1.39 Furthermore, the coulombic efficiency keep nearly 100% all the way.

In addition, Fig. 4d shows the long-term cycling stability of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss array electrode, which was evaluated by the repeated charging–discharging measurement at a constant current densities of 11 mA cm−2. It can be observed that the area capacitance of the NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays electrode increases gradually in the first 1000 cycles, which can be attributed to the activation of the electrode, which is consistent with some others' results.27,37,38 The areal capacitance of the electrode reach the peak value of 2.5 F cm−2 (1136 F g−1) at a cycle number of 1000. Afterwards, the areal capacitance begins to decline slowly, which is mainly due to the loss of active material and electrical contact caused by the mechanical stress between the NiCo2O4 nanograss and nickel foam.40 In the end, the areal capacitance of the electrode still has the value of 2.2 F cm−2 (1000 F g−1) after 4000 cycles, keeping 88% of the peak value, 113% of the pristine value. The enhanced ion diffusion and effective electron transfer in the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays after 1000 cycles are further confirmed by the EIS measurements (Fig. S2, ESI).37,38 The cycling stability of the hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays electrode is competitive with other NiCo2O4-based nanostructures, such as single-crystalline NiCo2O4 nanoneedle arrays, which has 12% loss after 2000 cycles at 5.56 m A cm−2,34 the ultrathin mesoporous NiCo2O4 nanosheets electrode, which has 6% loss at 2 A g−1 after 2300 cycles.32 The results demonstrate the outstanding cycling stability of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays electrode.

The excellent electrochemical performance of the material is mainly contributed by several factors. First, the Ni foam substrate supports the 3D skeleton for the material to adhere, which not only enhance the stable of the material, but also improve the electrical conductivity of electrode.14,30 Second, the unique structure of hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays. The nanosheets of the nanograss connect each other, forming a network, and providing the template for the nanowire to grow, which could enhance the electric contact with the current collector and the utilization of the active material. Third, the novel structure of nanograss enhances the contact areal between the active material and the electrolyte and improves the electrochemical activity of the material.

Conclusions

In summary, hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays on Ni foam have been successfully synthesized via a facile hydrothermal method combined with a subsequent calcination treatment. The hierarchical porous NiCo2O4 nanograss arrays electrode demonstrate the areal capacitance as high as 2.5 F cm−2 (1136 F g−1) at 11 mA cm−2 (5 A g−1). In addition, even after more than 4000 cycles at a high current density, a capacitance of 2.2 F cm−2 (1000 F g−1) at 11 mA cm−2 with 88.0% retention is achieved. This unique hierarchical array highlights the advantage of NiCo2O4, which demonstrate the outstanding capacitive behavior. So it possess a great promise for the application as supercapacitor electrode.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2132014) and the Beijing University of Technology Basic Research Foundation (X4102001201101).

Notes and references

  1. A. S. Arico, P. Bruce, B. Scrosati, J. M. Tarascon and W. Van Schalkwijk, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 366 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. M. Armand and J. M. Tarascon, Nature, 2008, 451, 652 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. T. Brezesinski, J. Wang, S. H. Tolbert and B. Dunn, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 146 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. P. G. Bruce, B. Scrosati and J.-M. Tarascon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 2930 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. C. Yuan, H. B. Wu, Y. Xie and X. W. Lou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1488 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. P. Simon and Y. Gogotsi, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 845 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. D.-W. Wang, F. Li, M. Liu, G. Q. Lu and H.-M. Cheng, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 373 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. L. L. Zhang and X. S. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2520 RSC.
  9. E. Raymundo-Pinero, F. Leroux and F. Beguin, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 1877 CrossRef CAS.
  10. D. Y. Qu, J. Power Sources, 2002, 109, 403 CrossRef CAS.
  11. G. A. Snook, P. Kao and A. S. Best, J. Power Sources, 2011, 196, 1 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. X. Wang, N. Li, L. Zheng and Q. Chen, Progr. Chem., 2009, 21, 1832 Search PubMed.
  13. W. C. Fang, O. Chyan, C. L. Sun, C. T. Wu, C. P. Chen, K. H. Chen, L. C. Chen and J. H. Huang, Electrochem. Commun., 2007, 9, 239 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. L. Bao, J. Zang and X. Li, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 1215 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. J. Liu, J. Jiang, C. Cheng, H. Li, J. Zhang, H. Gong and H. J. Fan, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 2076 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Y. Li, P. Hasin and Y. Wu, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 1926 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. R. Li, X. Ren, F. Zhang, C. Du and J. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5010 RSC.
  18. S. J. Ding, T. Zhu, J. S. Chen, Z. Y. Wang, C. L. Yuan and X. W. Lou, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 6602 RSC.
  19. W. T. Deng, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, F. Lu, Q. Y. Chen and X. B. Ji, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 1743 RSC.
  20. C. Y. Cao, W. Guo, Z. M. Cui, W. G. Song and W. Cai, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 3204 RSC.
  21. Z. Wang, C. Y. Ma, H. L. Wang, Z. H. Liu and Z. P. Hao, J. Alloys Compd., 2013, 552, 486 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. J. S. Shaikh, R. C. Pawar, R. S. Devan, Y. R. Ma, P. P. Salvi, S. S. Kolekar and P. S. Patil, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, 2127 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. X. H. Li, G. Y. Wang, X. W. Wang, X. P. Li and J. H. Ji, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 10103 CAS.
  24. Y. Huang, Y. Y. Li, Z. Q. Hu, G. M. Wei, J. L. Guo and J. P. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 9809 CAS.
  25. W. W. Zhou, J. P. Liu, T. Chen, K. S. Tan, X. T. Jia, Z. Q. Luo, C. X. Cong, H. P. Yang, C. M. Li and T. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 14462 RSC.
  26. X. H. Xia, J. P. Tu, Y. J. Mai, X. L. Wang, C. D. Gu and X. B. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 9319 RSC.
  27. X. Liu, S. Shi, Q. Xiong, L. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Tang, C. Gu, X. Wang and J. Tu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 8790 CAS.
  28. H. Jiang, J. Ma and C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4465 RSC.
  29. L. Yu, G. Q. Zhang, C. Z. Yuan and X. W. Lou, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 137 RSC.
  30. G. Y. He, L. Wang, H. Q. Chen, X. Q. Sun and X. Wang, Mater. Lett., 2013, 98, 164 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. H. B. Wu, H. Pang and X. W. Lou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3619 CAS.
  32. C. Z. Yuan, J. Y. Li, L. R. Hou, X. G. Zhang, L. F. Shen and X. W. Lou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2012, 22, 4592 CrossRef CAS.
  33. C. Zhou, Y. W. Zhang, Y. Y. Li and J. P. Liu, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 2078 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. G. Q. Zhang, H. B. Wu, H. E. Hoster, M. B. Chan-Park and X. W. Lou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 9453 CAS.
  35. G. Zhang and X. W. David Lou, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1470 CAS.
  36. Q. Wang, X. Wang, B. Liu, G. Yu, X. Hou, D. Chen and G. Shen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 2468 CAS.
  37. J. Pu, J. Wang, X. Jin, F. Cui, E. Sheng and Z. Wang, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 106, 226 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. X. Y. Liu, Y. Q. Zhang, X. H. Xia, S. J. Shi, Y. Lu, X. L. Wang, C. D. Gu and J. P. Tu, J. Power Sources, 2013, 239, 157 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. H. Jiang, J. Ma and C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4465 RSC.
  40. R. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Yu, X. L. Jia, L. Gao, J. Sun, R. F. Hicks and Y. F. Lu, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 3791 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: XRD analysis, EIS spectrum. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ra47243d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.