Peptidomimetic inhibitors of N-myristoyltransferase from human malaria and leishmaniasis parasites

Abstract

N-Myristoyltransferase (NMT) has been shown to be essential in Leishmania and subsequently validated as a drug target in Plasmodium. Herein, we discuss the use of antifungal NMT inhibitors as a basis for inhibitor development resulting in the first sub-micromolar peptidomimetic inhibitors of Plasmodium and Leishmania NMTs. High-resolution structures of these inhibitors with Plasmodium and Leishmania NMTs permit a comparative analysis of binding modes, and provide the first crystal structure evidence for a ternary NMT-Coenzyme A/myristoylated peptide product complex.

---

Malaria and leishmaniases, infectious diseases caused by Plasmodium and Leishmania respectively, rank among the world's most important public health challenges. These diseases result in high mortality and morbidity; moreover, they impose a severe economic burden on affected countries, mainly in Africa. Of the Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum is the most deadly, accounting for over 1 million deaths in 2010, and P. vivax is the most widespread.¹ Although malaria-related deaths have reduced by 30% in recent years, resistance to current anti-malarial drugs presents an ongoing challenge, highlighting the need to identify and develop safer and preferably less resistance-prone treatments.² Visceral leishmaniasis, the most deadly of the leishmaniases, is caused by L. donovani, and accounts for ∼50 000 deaths per annum.³ Currently available treatments can be expensive, possess a relatively narrow therapeutic window or are subject to resistance, highlighting the need for better drugs.⁴

N-Myristoyltransferase (NMT), an enzyme that modifies protein substrates by attaching myristate (14 : 0) to an N-terminal glycine via an amide bond, has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target in both malaria and leishmaniasis^5,6 and has recently been validated as viable drug target for human malaria.⁷ Catalysis is thought to commence with ordered binding of S-myristoyl-coenzyme A (Myr-CoA) followed by the protein substrate, transfer of myristate and ordered release of myristoylated protein and free coenzyme A.⁸ Myristoylation is important for protein–protein and protein–membrane interactions; the essentiality of NMT in the viability of both fungal and protozoan organisms^9,10 makes NMT an interesting target for the development of antifungal and anti-parasitic drugs.^11,12

Peptidomimetic inhibitors based on peptide substrates of NMT have previously been developed against Candida albicans NMT (CaNMT),^13,14 but have yet to be reported in the context of parasitic NMT inhibition. CaNMT shares 44% and 43% sequence identity with P. vivax and L. donovani NMTs (PvNMT, LdNMT) respectively; we reasoned that inhibitors of Plasmodium and Leishmania NMTs might be acquired through a ‘piggy-back’ approach, using CaNMT peptidomimetics as a platform.¹⁵ Reported CaNMT peptidomimetic inhibitors were based on residues 1–7 at the N-terminus of C. albicans ADP ribosylation factor protein, GLYASKL. Subsequently, the N-terminal amine and Ser5-Lys6 dipeptide, a motif also seen in known substrates of Plasmodium and Leishmania NMTs, were identified as making important binding contributions.^5,7 We therefore chose to employ a similar peptidomimetic scaffold based on the Ser-Lys motif, substituting the first four amino acids with an alkyl chain capped by a group that mimics the N-terminal amine, and the C-terminal leucine with a hydrophobic motif (Fig. 1). Our inhibitor library design incorporated modifications at the C- and N-termini with the objective of exploring contacts at both ends of the scaffold. Peptidomimetics were synthesized through a combination of solid and solution phase chemistries. N-Boc-protected amino and 1H-imidazol-1-yl acids were coupled to an O-t-butyl serine/N-Boc lysine dipeptide linked via a chlorotrityl (Route A, Scheme 1) or hydrazinobenzoyl linker (Route B, Scheme 1) to polystyrene resin. In the case of chlorotrityl resins, intermediates were cleaved from the resin with 0.5% TFA–DCM and coupled to the requisite amine (Scheme 1). C-terminal amide and acid analogs were synthesized using similar chemistry on Rink amide and Wang resins, respectively.

Fig. 1 Peptidomimetic scaffold targeting parasite NMTs. R₁ and R₂ represent points of variation at the N- and C-termini.

Scheme 1 Synthetic routes to peptidomimetics. Reagents and conditions. (a) Fmoc-Ser(t-Bu)-OH, HBTU, DIPEA, DMF; (b) 20% piperidine–DMF; (c) R₃COOH, HATU, DIPEA, DMF; (d) 0.5% TFA in DCM; (e) R₄NH₂, HATU, DIPEA, DMF; (f) TFA–TIPS–H₂O (95 : 2.5 : 2.5); (g) Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH, HBTU, DIPEA, DMF; (h) Cu(OAc)₂, pyridine, DCM, R₄NH₂.

Switching to a hydrazinobenzoyl linker eliminated the need for solution phase chemistry to couple the C-terminal amine;¹⁶ thus one-pot treatment of the peptidyl-resin in the presence of copper(II) acetate and excess of the appropriate amine led to simultaneous cleavage of the peptide from the resin and formation of the corresponding protected peptidomimetic.

Final products were deprotected by treatment with TFA and purified by semi-preparative RP-HPLC-MS to give a small library of peptidomimetic inhibitors. Modifications at the N-terminus were approached by two distinct structural permutations: varying the N-terminal motif (R₁, Fig. 1) to optimize basicity, and varying the alkyl linker length (n) to determine the optimal distance between the N-terminal amide of the serine and the N-terminal nitrogen atom of R₁ (Fig. 1). The N-terminal motif of the peptidomimetic was expected to interact directly with the C-terminal carboxylate leucine of the enzyme, a critical residue for catalytic activity responsible for the activation of the N-terminal amine of the protein/peptide substrate.¹⁷

2-Methylimidazolyl analogues were synthesized building on the hypothesis that 2-methylimidazole (pK_a ∼ 7.9)¹⁸ is a reasonable mimetic for N-terminal Gly in the peptide substrate (pK_a ∼ 8.0).¹⁹ To cover a range of basicity, imidazolyl (pK_a ∼ 7.0) and amine analogues (pK_a ∼ 10.0) were also synthesized, each exploring a range of chain lengths (n) (Table 1). To probe versatility at the C-terminus, primary amides, carboxylic acids, 2-cyclohexylethyl and 2-(1-cyclohexenyl)ethyl amides were incorporated. Using a previously reported fluorogenic assay,²⁰ inhibitors were tested against the parasitic enzymes and HsNMT1 in order to explore their selectivity against a relevant host enzyme. Previously reported imidazolyl-derived peptidomimetics (1–4) shown to possess low-μM activities against CaNMT¹⁴ displayed little or no activity against the parasitic enzymes used in this study. Slightly improved potency was observed for 2-methylimidazolyl analogues (5–8) across all chain lengths tested, and particularly 6, which provided sub-micromolar inhibition for L. donovani NMT. However, amine 9 showed markedly improved inhibition against the NMTs of P. vivax (PvNMT), L. donovani (LdNMT) and H. sapiens (HsNMT1) (Table 1). Reduction of the alkyl chain length from n = 10 to 9 gave compound 10, which is the most potent L. donovani NMT inhibitor reported to date (LdNMT IC₅₀ = 24 nM). It also showed somewhat lower activity against HsNMT1 (IC₅₀ = 60 nM) and PvNMT (680 nM). Further reduction of the chain length (11 and 12, n = 8 and 7, respectively) led to loss of detectable activity against Plasmodium NMTs and significant loss of activity against LdNMT and HsNMT1. Comparing N-terminal variations with similar chain length, the potency of amine 10 against LdNMT was over 400- and 20-fold higher than 2 (1H-imidazol-1-yl) and 6 (2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl), respectively.

Table 1 Structures and enzyme affinities for peptidomimetics synthesized in this study^a

	R1	n	R2	IC50 (μM)
				PvNMT	PfNMT	LdNMT	HsNMT1
a Enzymatic activities of recombinant P. vivax, P. falciparum and L. donovani NMT in the presence of peptidomimetic inhibitors expressed as IC50 values. These values are a mean of duplicate or triplicate experiments.
1	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	10	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	25.8 ± 8.2	47.6 ± 3.8
2	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	9	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	10.6 ± 1.6	44.0 ± 7.1
3	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	8	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	16.7 ± 2.5	>100
4	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	7	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	34.8 ± 3.7	>100
5	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	10	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	>100	21.8 ± 0.8
6	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	9	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	0.63 ± 0.01	7.92 ± 0.83
7	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	8	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	3.42 ± 0.34	49.9 ± 10.6
8	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	7	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	1.46 ± 0.22	82.2 ± 14.0
9	H2N–	10	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	1.04 ± 0.01	>100	0.14 ± 0.01	0.34 ± 0.03
10	H2N–	9	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	0.68 ± 0.08	24.3 ± 3.4	0.024 ± 0.003	0.06 ± 0.003
11	H2N–	8	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	2.01 ± 0.30	7.68 ± 0.86
12	H2N–	7	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	1.39 ± 0.18	6.75 ± 0.45
13	MeNH–	9	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	0.21 ± 0.01	0.73 ± 0.10
14	H3C–	0	2-Cyclohexylethanamine	>100	>100	>100	>100
15	H2N–	10	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	12.9 ± 1.07	>100	6.60 ± 1.28	2.30 ± 0.14
16	H2N–	9	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	3.55 ± 0.38	>100	0.44 ± 0.04	0.67 ± 0.04
17	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	10	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	>100	>100	>100	>100
18	1H-Imidazol-1-yl	9	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	>100	>100	>100	>100
19	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	10	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	>100	>100	>100	>100
20	2-Methyl-1H-Imidazol-1-yl	9	2-(1-Cyclohexenyl)-ethanamine	>100	>100	28.0 ± 2.5	>100
21	H2N–	10	–NH2	>100	>100	13.3 ± 2.0	5.40 ± 0.41
22	H2N–	9	–NH2	22.9 ± 3.5	>100	1.36 ± 0.20	1.36 ± 0.29
23	H2N–	8	–NH2	>100	>100	27.1 ± 2.6	33.1 ± 2.5
24	H2N–	7	–NH2	>100	>100	61.9 ± 4.7	>100
25	H2N–	10	–OH	>100	>100	86.7 ± 10.4	39.2 ± 2.0
26	H2N–	9	–OH	>100	>100	>100	92.1 ± 17.6

---

We next probed the SAR around the amino group of 10, and found that N-methylation (to give 13) led to significant reduction in potency, whilst replacing the flexible N-terminal chain with an acetyl group (to give 14) resulted in no observable activity.

We further probed the importance of charge at the N-terminus by substituting a hydroxyl for the amine and observed a more modest loss in activity of >100 and 1000 folds in Leishmania and Human NMTs respectively (46, ESI,† accession code: 4c7i). These observations are consistent with our expectation that the N-terminal moiety of the inhibitor is involved in a strong electrostatic interaction with the C-terminal carboxylate of the enzyme, an interaction likely to be sensitive to changes in inhibitor structure and charge.²¹ Amongst inhibitors with a C-terminal 2-(1-cyclohexenyl)ethanamide (15–20, Table 1), 16 showed fair activity against LdNMT, HsNMT1 and PvNMT, whilst others showed little (15) or no activity (17–20) against the tested enzymes up to the highest concentration tested (100 μM). This 10–20 fold drop in activity relative to 2-cyclohexylethanamide suggests that the presence of a single unsaturated bond in the pocket occupied by the cyclohexenyl ring deters important interactions with the enzyme, presumably by modifying ring conformation. Inhibitors with C-terminal carboxamides and carboxylic acids (21–26) showed minimal activity across the enzymes tested, with the exception of 22 (Table 1) with an n = 9 chain length. Overall, an ideal chain length of n = 9 and a C-terminal cyclohexyl ring was observed to be the most potent combination irrespective of the enzyme tested, and at the N-terminus, inhibitor potencies increased in the order: 1H-imidazol-1-yl < 2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl < –NH₂.

To determine the binding mode of 10, a ternary complex with PvNMT and S-(2-oxo)pentadecyl-CoA (NHM, a non-hydrolysable Myr-CoA analogue) was crystallized and solved to a high resolution of 1.38 Å (accession code: 4c68, Fig. 2A). 10 sits in the peptide-binding pocket, and mimics the key recognition elements involved in binding the parent peptide (GLYASKL, Fig. 2B and C). The N-terminal amine electrostatically interacts with the carboxylate of Leu410 whilst the hydroxyl group of the serine hydrogen bonds to the His213 side chain. In addition, there are ionic interactions between the amino group of the lysine and three neighboring aspartic acid residues (Asp98, Asp100, Asp385), all of which are conserved in equivalent residues CaNMT. The aliphatic chain on the N-terminus and the N-terminal amino group of the inhibitor are guided by the peptide binding channel to the C-terminal residue of PvNMT–Leu410. For comparison, a ternary structure of 10 with the native substrate, Myr-CoA, in L. major NMT (97% sequence identity to L. donovani) was solved and refined to a resolution of 1.41 Å (accession code: 4c7h). As expected, the mode of binding of 10 in L. major is very similar to that in P. vivax.

Fig. 2 (A) Co-crystal structure of PvNMT (chain C; grey surface) with bound NHM (magenta) and 10 (green), colored by atom. (B) Superimposition of peptide substrate (GLYASKL, blue) with 10 (green, 4c68) in PvNMT. The peptide was modeled to maximize overall structural similarity while maintaining peptide geometric restraints. (C) Ternary structure of 10 (green, sticks) and non-hydrolysable Myr-CoA (partially shown; magenta; sticks) in PvNMT (4c68) showing main recognition interactions between 10 and the enzyme. Residues within 4 Å of 10 are shown in blue. Polar interactions and their distances (in Å) are shown as dashed lines. (D) Refined electron density map showing the mixture of structures of 10 and myr-10 (yellow) in a ball and stick representation observed in LmNMT (4c7h). The figure shows the mixture of ligands present in the final refined model (80% reactants – purple and red and 20% products – green and yellow) shown in a ball-and-stick representation to aid identification. Electron density figures were made using the program CCP4 mg.²² See Fig. S2 (ESI†) for more details.

Unexpectedly, the electron maps indicated a mixture of ligand structures such that ∼20% of the electron density represents a N-myristoylated 10 product complex with the CoA by-product in LmNMT (Fig. 2D). This is the only structural evidence for a product complex in any N-myristoyltransferase, and captures and supports the proposed mechanism of action of NMT just prior to regeneration of the active enzyme. Kinetic experiments were performed to study 10 both as a potential substrate and as an NMT inhibitor. As anticipated from the structures above, 10 appeared to behave as a peptide-competitive inhibitor but no substrate characteristics were detected in the assay up to 40 μM (Fig. S3 and S4, ESI†). The N-myristoylation of 10 observed above therefore presumably occurs within the crystal where all reagents are present at high effective concentrations, and turnover is blocked by limited egress of products.

To probe the degree to which 10 acts as a true peptidomimetic, we investigated the potential to switch from inhibitor to a peptidomimetic substrate. A glycine (27) or alanine (28) residue was incorporated in the N-terminal extension; 27 was found to be a substrate for Leishmania NMT with K_M = 1.3 μM, which compares favorably with the affinity of a CaNMT octapeptide substrate (GLYASKLS-NH₂, K_M = 0.6 μM)¹³ and the model peptide substrate used for inhibitor assays (GSNKSKPK-NH₂H. sapiens p60^src_(2–9), K_M = 22.6 μM), although with a considerably reduced V_max (Fig. S4, ESI†). 28, on the other hand, showed no detectable substrate activity. In native NMT substrates, N-terminal Gly is preferred to the exclusion of all other residues, with relatively non-sterically demanding residues such as alanine. The substrate properties of 27 and 28 suggest a highly peptidomimetic binding conformation, and imply that steric factors play a key role in the progression of the catalytic cycle, dictating the approach of the N-terminal amine to the C-terminal leucine of the enzyme.

The potent inhibitors discovered in this study showed low specificity for the Plasmodium NMTs in comparison to Leishmania and human NMTs. A sequence alignment of residues within 6 Å of the catalytic sites of Leishmania and Human NMTs (see ESI†) showed a 74% similarity between both enzymes. In comparison, a similar alignment of Human and Plasmodium NMTs showed a 53% similarity between residues. The catalytic site of Leishmania NMT is, therefore, thought to show more comparability to the Human enzyme than the Plasmodium NMTs. Additionally, there are key residues, such as Arg231 (LdNMT) and Lys308 (Human NMT), capable of forming hydrogen bond interactions which would otherwise be impossible in the Plasmodium NMTs (Gly225). It is thought that the presence of such basic centres could increase the binding and subsequently, potencies of these inhibitors for Leishmania and human NMTs.

Unusually, the inhibitors in this study showed a higher specificity for P. vivax NMT in comparison to P. falciparum NMT. An alignment of the primary sequences of both enzymes (see ESI†) highlighted four differing residues within 6 Å of the peptide binding pocket: Ile102, Tyr212, Ser228, Tyr334 (PvNMT) and Val102, Phe212, Cys228 and Phe334 (PfNMT). Of these differences, the replacement of Y334 to F334 in PfNMT constitutes a structural change in the peptide pocket that could lead to a loss of potential hydrogen bond interactions within the catalytic site. The reason for the specificity for PvNMT is unclear; however, we propose that the loss of such vital hydrogen bonds in PfNMT could be responsible for this observation.

Conclusions

Using antifungal NMT inhibitors as a platform, we developed inhibitors of Plasmodium and Leishmania NMTs, resulting in the identification of an inhibitor, 10, with sub-micromolar potency against P. vivax and L. donovani NMTs, and the most potent Leishmania donovani NMT inhibitor reported to date. High-resolution ternary structures of compound 10 were achieved in both PvNMT and LmNMT, with the latter structure revealing the first structural evidence supporting the proposed catalytic cycle of NMT. Although 10 shows moderate selectivity against human NMT, the structures presented here may serve as a useful tool to enable a structure-guided design of more potent and selective parasitic inhibitors.

Funding sources and acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC; grants G0900278 and U117532067), the Wellcome Trust (grant 087792), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (David Phillips Research Fellowship to E.W.T., grant BB/D02014X/1). We are also grateful to Imperial College for an Imperial College President and Rector's award and the Student Opportunities Fund for funding. We are grateful to Prof. Deborah Smith (University of York), Dr J. Hutton (Imperial College) and colleagues for helpful discussions and Diamond Light Source (Harwell, UK) for provision of excellent synchrotron radiation facilities.

Notes and references

1. C. J. L. Murray, L. C. Rosenfeld, S. S. Lim, K. G. Andrews, K. J. Foreman, D. Haring, N. Fullman, M. Naghavi, R. Lozano and A. D. Lopez, Lancet, 2012, 379, 413–431.
2. A. M. Thayer, Chem. Eng. News, 2005, 83, 69–82.
3. F. Chappuis, S. Sundar, A. Hailu, H. Ghalib, S. Rijal, R. W. Peeling, J. Alvar and M. Boelaert, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2007, 5, 873–882.
4. G. Srividya, A. Kulshrestha, R. Singh and P. Salotra, Parasitol. Res., 2012, 110, 1065–1078.
5. E. W. Tate, A. S. Bell, M. D. Rackham and M. H. Wright, Parasitology, 2014, 141, 37–49.
6. M. D. Rackham, J. A. Brannigan, K. Rangachari, S. Meister, A. J. Wilkinson, A. A. Holder, R. J. Leatherbarrow and E. W. Tate, J. Med. Chem., 2014, 57, 2773–2788.
7. M. H. Wright, B. Clough, M. D. Rackham, K. Rangachari, J. A. Brannigan, M. Grainger, D. K. Moss, A. R. Bottrill, W. P. Heal, M. Broncel, R. A. Serwa, D. Brady, D. J. Mann, R. J. Leatherbarrow, R. Tewari, A. J. Wilkinson, A. A. Holder and E. W. Tate, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 112–121.
8. D. A. Rudnick, C. A. McWherter, W. J. Rocque, P. J. Lennon, D. P. Getman and J. I. Gordon, J. Biol. Chem., 1991, 266, 9732–9739.
9. J. K. Lodge, E. Jacksonmachelski, D. L. Toffaletti, J. R. Perfect and J. I. Gordon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1994, 91, 12008–12012.
10. H. P. Price, M. R. Menon, C. Panethymitaki, D. Goulding, P. G. McKean and D. F. Smith, J. Biol. Chem., 2003, 278, 7206–7214.
11. J. A. Frearson, S. Brand, S. P. McElroy, L. A. T. Cleghorn, O. Smid, L. Stojanovski, H. P. Price, M. L. S. Guther, L. S. Torrie, D. A. Robinson, I. Hallyburton, C. P. Mpamhanga, J. A. Brannigan, A. J. Wilkinson, M. Hodgkinson, R. Hui, W. Qiu, O. G. Raimi, D. M. F. van Aalten, R. Brenk, I. H. Gilbert, K. D. Read, A. H. Fairlamb, M. A. J. Ferguson, D. F. Smith and P. G. Wyatt, Nature, 2010, 464, 728–732.
12. V. Goncalves, J. A. Brannigan, D. Whalley, K. H. Ansell, B. Saxty, A. A. Holder, A. J. Wilkinson, E. W. Tate and R. J. Leatherbarrow, J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55, 3578–3582.
13. B. Devadas, M. E. Zupec, S. K. Freeman, D. L. Brown, S. Nagarajan, J. A. Sikorski, C. A. McWherter, D. P. Getman and J. I. Gordon, J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 1837–1840.
14. J. A. Sikorski, B. Devadas, M. E. Zupec, S. K. Freeman, D. L. Brown, H. F. Lu, S. Nagarajan, P. P. Mehta, A. C. Wade, N. S. Kishore, M. L. Bryant, D. P. Getman, C. A. McWherter and J. I. Gordon, Biopolymers, 1997, 43, 43–71.
15. M. H. Gelb, W. C. Van Voorhis, F. S. Buckner, K. Yokoyama, R. Eastman, E. P. Carpenter, C. Panethymitaki, K. A. Brown and D. F. Smith, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 2003, 126, 155–163.
16. Y. H. Woo, A. R. Mitchell and J. A. Camarero, Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther., 2007, 13, 181–190.
17. T. A. Farazi, J. K. Manchester, G. Waksman and J. I. Gordon, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 9177–9186.
18. B. Lenarcik and P. Ojczenasz, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2002, 39, 287–290.
19. B. Devadas, S. K. Freeman, M. E. Zupec, H. F. Lu, S. R. Nagarajan, N. S. Kishore, J. K. Lodge, D. W. Kuneman, C. A. McWherter, D. V. Vinjamoori, D. P. Getman, J. I. Gordon and J. A. Sikorski, J. Med. Chem., 1997, 40, 2609–2625.
20. V. Goncalves, J. A. Brannigan, E. Thinon, T. O. Olaleye, R. Serwa, S. Lanzarone, A. J. Wilkinson, E. W. Tate and R. J. Leatherbarrow, Anal. Biochem., 2012, 421, 342–344.
21. R. S. Bhatnagar, K. Futterer, T. A. Farazi, S. Korolev, C. L. Murray, E. Jackson-Machelski, G. W. Gokel, J. I. Gordon and G. Waksman, Nat. Struct. Biol., 1998, 5, 1091–1097.
22. S. McNicholas, E. Potterton, K. S. Wilson and M. E. M. Noble, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr., 2011, 67, 386–394.

---

Footnote

† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, characterization of intermediates and target compounds, description of biological assays, and crystallographic information are available in the Supplementary Information. The coordinates and structure factor files have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with the accession codes: 4c68 (PvNMT-NHM-10), 4c7h (LmNMT-MyrCoA-10) and 4c7i (LmNMT-MyrCoA-46). See DOI: 10.1039/c4ob01669f

---