Open Access Article
E.
Menéndez
*ab,
C.
Templier
c,
G.
Abrasonis
d,
J. F.
Lopez-Barbera
b,
J.
Nogués
*be,
K.
Temst
a and
J.
Sort
ef
aInstituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: Enric.MenendezDalmau@fys.kuleuven.be; Tel: +32(0)16327145
bICN2 – Institut Catala de Nanociencia i Nanotecnologia, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: Josep.Nogues@uab.cat; Tel: +34 937371604
cInstitut P', Université de Poitiers & ENSMA, 86962 Futuroscope-Chasseneuil, France
dInstitute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, P. O. Box 510119, 01314 Dresden, Germany
eICREA – Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
fDepartament de Física, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain
First published on 11th February 2014
The mechanical and magnetic properties of a nitrided austenitic stainless steel are studied using a combinatorial approach. Plasma nitriding of a [100]-oriented 316L single crystal is carried out using a loose shadow mask to produce an in-plane lateral gradient of nitrogen concentration that extends up to 100 μm. The local mechanical and magnetic properties across the gradually nitrided area are resolved by nanoindentation and the polar magneto-optic Kerr effect, respectively. The hardness, reduced Young's modulus and remanence qualitatively depict the nitrogen profile, suggesting that the nitrogen concentration is a central effect for these observed dependencies. Conversely, the coercivity exhibits a non-monotonic behaviour due to the interplay between magnetic anisotropy and the strength of the induced ferromagnetism. Fingerprints of the expected transition from a nitrogen supersaturated solid solution to a multiphase nature of expanded austenite are evidenced along the gradually nitrided area.
Nitriding of austenitic stainless steels at moderate temperatures (e.g., 400 °C) is a common route to improve their surface mechanical properties since nitriding leads to an enhanced hardness8 and wear resistance9 without compromising the corrosion resistance.10 After nitriding, ASSs also become ferromagnetic by means of the formation of the so-called expanded austenite phase γN10–14 which, rather than a supersaturated nitrogen solid solution, shows a multiphase nature consisting of nanometric CrN precipitates embedded in a Fe4N-like matrix.15 The nitrided top layer is not homogeneous along the depth of the sample, exhibiting a combination of interconnected gradients, such as N concentration,16,17 residual stress,18 stacking fault density18 or lattice rotation,19,20 which yields a graded material along the depth. Since these factors and, particularly, the nitrogen concentration play a key role in determining the mechanical and magnetic characteristics of the expanded austenite phase, a direct correlation between these parameters and the resulting properties is of particular interest to establish the functional performance of nitrided ASSs. While composition, residual stress and stacking fault density depth distributions can be determined by non-destructive measurements,21 a destructive time-consuming successive partial removal of the material is often necessary to obtain the mechanical depth profiles (e.g., nanoindentation tomography).22 Therefore, routes able to give insight into the influence of the N content on the mechanical and magnetic properties, while avoiding either destructive procedures (i.e., partial layer removal) or the tedious production of diverse samples with dissimilar surface N contents, are of particular scientific and technological interest. Here, a fast and versatile approach to obtain at once (i.e., with a single nitriding procedure) an in-plane (i.e., lateral) gradient of the nitrogen content at the surface of a 316L ASS single crystal, resulting in a graded expanded austenite, is presented. This offers the possibility to study, in a straightforward and non-destructive manner, the changes induced in the mechanical and magnetic properties as a function of the amount of nitrogen which is incorporated in the austenite phase in a single sample. Since the properties of ASSs, such as mechanical behaviour22 or nitrogen diffusivity,23–25 strongly depend on the crystalline orientation, a [100] ASS single crystal rather than a polycrystalline sample has been chosen. This also avoids the influence of grain boundaries and intergrain interactions on the resulting stress state and magnetic properties of the expanded austenite.12,13
As can be seen in Fig. 1c and 2a, the energy dispersive X-ray analysis nitrogen profile clearly shows that the N content decreases as one moves away from the edge of the mask. This extends up to around 100 μm under the masked area, depicting to some extent the topographic step and, thus, confirming the production of an in-plane nitrided system with a graded surface N content.
In order to spatially resolve the evolution of the mechanical properties along the gradually nitrided area, nanoindentation measurements have been carried out in lateral steps of 1 μm. As can be clearly seen in Fig. 2b, the maximum displacement h (i.e., penetration) inversely scales with the N content, indicating a higher resistance to penetration (and hence an enhanced hardness) as the measurements are carried out from the non-nitrided to the fully nitrided areas. Fig. 2c and d show the evolution of the hardness H and the reduced Young's modulus Er along the gradually nitrided area. Both parameters exhibit progressively higher values as the assessed areas become closer to the fully nitrided volume, qualitatively mimicking the N profile. For instance, in agreement with previously reported results,22 the hardness H is around 2.5 GPa in the non-nitrided areas and 16 GPa in the fully nitrided counterpart. Due to the perpendicular depth gradient of N concentration, a quantitative correlation between H, Er and N concentration is not straightforward. However, the fact that the H and Er lateral profiles image the N lateral profile suggests that the N content is a key tuning parameter for the observed changes in the mechanical properties. A multiphase nature of expanded austenite, which develops as the N content increases, has been recently reported. This consists of CrN nanometric precipitates embedded in a Fe4N-like matrix whose formation is linked to the amount of nitrogen.15 Therefore, while the enhanced hardness in the low N content region of the profile may be mostly ascribed to solid solution hardening processes, a combination of solid solution and precipitation hardening is expected when probing the areas close to the fully nitrided region.
The dispersion of the mechanical parameters broadens, as the assessed areas are closer to the partially/fully nitrided interface. This might be attributed to either local compositional inhomogeneities, variations in density of defects or local roughness. Eventually, these local inhomogeneities might be due to the presence of the precipitates within the matrix of the expanded austenite, which would be in agreement with the expected multiphase nature of this region. Nevertheless, although atomic force microscopy imaging of the fully nitrided areas reveals rather flat surfaces with a root mean square roughness of around 7 nm (note that the pristine areas show decreased roughness with root mean square values between 2–4 nm), a certain contribution to this dispersion broadening from local roughness cannot be completely ruled out.29
Fig. 3 shows the polar magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) loops corresponding to different localized areas (schematically represented in panel a) along the gradually nitrided areas. The fully nitrided areas exhibit a rather square-shaped loop, evidenced by a high remanence (loop A), in agreement with the easy axis behaviour of [100] expanded austenite produced at 400 °C.13 This is mainly ascribed to the interplay between a large out-of-plane lattice expansion and the expected presence of Fe and Ni-enriched areas due to the multiphase nature of expanded austenite. For the measured areas closer to the shadow edge (e.g., loops B, C or D), the hysteresis loops show more gradual magnetization reversals (i.e., more tilted branches, exhibiting a broader distribution of switching fields) and incipient traces of other magnetic contributions as a result of the variations in the N profile. Two-step loops with tilted branches are discernible close to the edge and the adjacent gradually nitrided area (loops E and F in Fig. 3c). Since the area probed by the laser spot of the MOKE is around 3 μm and the measurements are performed in steps of 5 μm, the two step-like loops might be the result of assessing areas with dissimilar N contents. Further within the gradually nitrided area, the different magnetic contributions seem to merge in a rather rounded hysteresis loop (loop G). This could be correlated with the incipient loss of the multiphase nature of expanded austenite, starting to behave as a single phase (i.e., as a nitrogen supersaturated solid solution) with a less pronounced ferromagnetic character. Beyond around 20 μm from the edge (i.e., below ≈ 23 at.% of N; regions H and I), the MOKE measurements exhibit significantly lower remanences, in agreement with a lower amount of incorporated nitrogen and thus a less pronounced out-of-plane expansion of the lattice cell, leading to a weaker perpendicular anisotropy. Concomitantly, the signal to noise ratio noticeably worsens, which is consistent with the weak ferromagnetic character of expanded austenite for low N contents. In the framework of the multiphase nature of expanded austenite, the decrease in the intensity of ferromagnetism can be also understood through the decrease in the N supersaturation which ultimately results in less CrN precipitate formation,14 effectively leaving less ferromagnetic Fe and Ni-enriched areas.15,32 For areas with even lower N contents, this might not apply since the amount of N is well below the amount of Cr (around 18 at.% in AISI 316L ASS) and the expanded austenite is then expected to behave as a solid solution. However, the decrease in the intensity of ferromagnetism in this region can be linked to a less pronounced change in the Fe–Cr–Ni atomic distances, which could also contribute to the ferromagnetic response.10 Even though the extent of the ferromagnetism seems to cover areas with rather low N content (see loops J and K in Fig. 3e), additional contributions from dispersed (i.e., inhomogeneous) ferromagnetic martensite traces33 cannot be completely ruled out. At around 110 μm away from the edge and further (region L), the ferromagnetic signal completely vanishes and the corresponding MOKE measurements resemble that of Fig. 3f, virtually exhibiting no hysteretic behaviour and, hence, no ferromagnetism.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 (a) EDX N profile where the local areas are assessed by MOKE are highlighted. The polar MOKE loops for the different areas are shown in panels (b)–(f). | ||
Fig. 4a shows the evolution of the amplitude of the MOKE signal which can be taken approximately proportional to the magnetization (i.e., to the strength of the induced ferromagnetism).34 Interestingly, a prominent (half of the previous values) drop of the signal takes place when going from 15 to 20 μm away from the edge, evidencing a pronounced decrease of the induced ferromagnetism. This coincides with the vanishing of the diverse magnetic contributions to the hysteresis loops (i.e., two-step loops) and might also be linked to the loss of the multiphase nature of expanded austenite, which results in less ferromagnetic Fe and Ni-enriched areas.15,32 From distances at least 40 μm away from the edge (below ≈ 14 at.% of N), the MOKE signal is one order of magnitude lower than that of the fully nitrided areas, revealing rather mild nitriding conditions which most probably can be attributed to an incipient expanded austenite (i.e., a solid solution).
The remnant to saturation magnetization ratio, MR/MS, follows a trend similar to the N profile (Fig. 4b), while the coercivity, HC, exhibits a non-monotonic behaviour (Fig. 4c). The remanence remains large (above 90%) in the fully nitrided area and up to 20 μm away from the edge. This indicates that the material maintains a well defined out-of-plane easy axis up to around 25 at.% of N. This is ascribed to the large lattice expansion along the [100] direction.13 The reduction of MR/MS as the N content becomes lower is ascribed to a weaker perpendicular anisotropy which results from a less pronounced out-of-plane lattice expansion,35 which is known to scale with the N content.19 The coercivity mainly depends on the ratio between magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization.36,37 The latter could be related to the intensity of induced ferromagnetism and the former could be assigned to the lattice expansion. Hence, the observed non-monotonic behaviour of the coercivity might be due to the dissimilar dependence of the induced perpendicular anisotropy and the strength of the induced ferromagnetism on the N content.
Although the correlation between coercivity and microstructure is still poorly understood,36 some studies have shown that the coercivity in magnetic materials depends on the occurrence of incoherent magnetization processes caused by the presence of defects.37 Thus, the CrN precipitates could act as pinning sites for domain wall movement, consequently affecting the coercivity, depending on their size and density. Interestingly, in the gradually nitrided areas close to the edge, the dispersion in the values of the mechanical parameters significantly broadens, the signal to noise ratio of the polar MOKE signal improves and the polar MOKE loops exhibit multiple magnetic contributions. This is consistent with the expected transition, from a nitrogen supersaturated solid solution to the multiphase structure of the expanded austenite as the N content increases, when plasma nitriding is performed at 400 °C.
We believe that the approach outlined in this study is of more general applicability to other material systems. This can be used not only for the basic studies of growth–structure–property relationships but also to optimize plasma or other thermo-chemical treatments of functional materials; for example, the diffusional formation of ferrite from austenite in Fe–C–X systems (X = Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, Si, …).7
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |