A protecting group approach toward synthesis of Au–silica Janus nanostars

Denis Rodríguez-Fernández ab, Thomas Altantzis c, Hamed Heidari c, Sara Bals c and Luis M. Liz-Marzán *abd
aBioNanoPlasmonics Laboratory, CIC biomaGUNE, Paseo de Miramón 182, 20009 Donostia – San Sebastián, Spain. E-mail: llizmarzan@cicbiomagune.es; Fax: +34 943005301
bDepartamento de Química Física, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
cEMAT-University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium
dIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain

Received 1st October 2013 , Accepted 21st October 2013

First published on 22nd October 2013


Abstract

The concept of protecting groups, widely used in organic chemistry, has been applied for the synthesis of Au–silica Janus stars, in which gold branches protrude from one half of Au–silica Janus spheres. This configuration opens up new possibilities to apply the plasmonic properties of gold nanostars, as well as a variety of chemical functionalizations on the silica component.


Protecting groups are commonly used in organic chemistry to perform chemical reactions in the presence of other functional groups that can be affected by the process. The quest for new protecting groups with multiple properties has led synthetic protocols to a new level that allows the preparation of highly complex molecules.1 Although protection and deprotection have been widely employed with great success at the molecular level and even with colloids larger than 100 nm, this strategy has been far less explored using small nanoparticles.2–5 Various molecular analogies have been proposed for the design of novel nanoscale materials, and in particular for plasmonic nanomaterials.6 However, whereas in organic chemistry these processes are mainly carried out in homogeneous solutions and the final products are obtained by routine techniques such as crystallization or chromatography and solvent evaporation, when working with colloids different parameters must be considered, e.g., to avoid aggregation during synthesis and recovery of the product, including the type of solvent, the nature of the nanoparticles or the stabilizing molecules, among others.

We present here a protecting group-like strategy to synthesize Janus nanoparticles, exhibiting different materials on roughly each half of the particle. Our objective was to achieve plasmonic nanoparticles that could hold different functionalities at opposite sides, while maintaining a strong optical (plasmonic) activity, for example gold nanostars7 in which the spikes protrude from only one half of the central sphere. Such a configuration may offer important advantages toward subsequent directed self-assembly processes or selective biofunctionalization. We thus devised a multistep procedure involving several pathways that have been previously used to synthesize patchy particles: self-assembly of ligands over a metallic surface, masking or protection and seeded growth.8 We first prepared 40 nm gold nanoparticles, onto which two different ligands were self-assembled to guide the growth of a silica semishell, leading to the formation of Au–SiO2 Janus particles. Besides providing colloidal stability due to a high negative charge, the silica semishell can act as a mask to direct the subsequent seeded growth of gold spikes, exclusively on the part of the metal that remained exposed to the solution. This ultimately leads to a particle comprising a silica sphere with Au branches protruding from one side and therefore having highly anisotropic optical properties. Finally, the silica shell can also be removed if required, thus completely mimicking the behavior of protecting groups in organic chemistry. This approach is summarized in Fig. 1 and full details are provided in the ESI.


image file: c3cc47531j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Representative TEM micrographs of: ∼40 nm Au@citrate (A); Janus Au–SiO2 (B); Au–SiO2 Janus nanostars (C); and Au Janus nanostars after SiO2 removal (D). See low magnification images in Fig. S1 (ESI).

Also shown in Fig. 1 are representative TEM images corresponding to the different synthesis steps (Vis-NIR spectra are shown in Fig. S2 and S3, ESI). First, ca. 40 nm citrate-capped Au spheres (λmax ∼ 528 nm) were prepared,9 which could be easily transferred into alcoholic solution for growth of the silica semishells, probably due to the high concentration of citrate molecules compared to earlier methods.10 Prior to formation of the oxide layer, in a 2-propanol[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]water mixture (2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) a ligand couple – 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA)–poly-(acrylic acid) (PAA, Mw = 25[thin space (1/6-em)]000 g mol−1) – was allowed to self-assemble over the metallic surface, resulting in significant segregation as previously reported.11 Silica was then formed by means of the well-known Stöber method only on top of the 4-MBA-capped area, while PAA acted as a stabilizer over the exposed gold surface (step 1, Fig. 1; Fig. S5, ESI). These particles were stable in the synthesis solution, but could also be washed with 2-propanol to remove the excess reactants with no apparent aggregation or particle degradation. Typical TEM images and Vis-NIR spectra (λmax ∼ 535 nm) are shown in Fig. 1B and Fig. S2 (ESI), respectively. The TEM micrographs nicely show the formation of silica semishells on the Au cores, with minor silica nucleation, which did not affect the subsequent synthesis steps, while the plasmon band shows a small redshift due to changes in the local refractive index around the Au nanoparticle cores.12 The SiO2 semishell was subsequently used as a hard mask to protect part of the surface against the further growth of Au spikes (step 2, Fig. 1). Upon centrifugation and washing with pure water, Au spikes were grown using a surfactant-free approach, where L-ascorbic acid acts as a weak reducing agent in the presence of AgNO3 and HCl (aq).13 We observed that spikes can only be grown in the presence of silver ions, otherwise metal overgrowth takes place without branch formation (see Fig. S6, ESI). Since this method avoids the use of surfactants and polymers, exchange of the remaining PAA is not needed and the obtained branched structures display a rather clean surface, which makes them ideal candidates for self-assembly or surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), where subsequent functionalization is usually required.14–18 Au–SiO2 Janus nanostars were obtained in less than one minute and collected by centrifugation. It has been reported that after several hours to days such nanostars may undergo a reshaping process, leading to less spiky structures, which is reflected in a plasmon band blueshift.19 In these surfactant-free stars this process was observed within a couple of days and additionally the silica semishell was found to dissolve if the particles were stored in aqueous solution after the synthesis (see Fig. S3 and S4, ESI).20 However, both processes can be prevented by transferring the particles into an ethanol solution containing 4-MBA (20 μM) and washing several times with pure ethanol to remove unattached 4-MBA molecules. As can be observed in Fig. 1C, the silica shell and the spikes are still present in particles prepared in this way. The choice of 4-MBA relies on the well-known adsorption of thiol molecules over metal surfaces, which prevents other surface phenomena from occurring, as reflected in the stability of the gold spikes, which remained unchanged for at least three months. Storage of Au–SiO2 Janus stars in water without addition of 4-MBA however leads to less spiky structures and silica dissolution within a few days (see Fig. S4). In contrast, upon addition of 4-MBA in water Au Janus nanostars were obtained, i.e. the Au branches were preserved while the silica protecting mask was removed (step 3, Fig. 1). A representative TEM image of these Au Janus nanostars is shown in Fig. 1D, where the branches can be seen next to a smooth gold hemisphere.

Since conventional TEM images only provide 2D projections of 3D objects, more detailed characterization was carried out by high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) tomography (see rendered movies in ESI), and aberration corrected high resolution HAADF-STEM to clarify their morphology. Two examples are shown in Fig. 2 for Au–SiO2 Janus nanostars with short and long branches, for which we display HAADF-STEM images obtained at different angles, together with the corresponding rendered 3D images. Silica is represented in blue and the metallic part in golden colour. These images clearly confirm that the gold spikes grow only from the exposed face of the metal, which is not covered by the silica hard mask (protecting group). Whereas for short spikes random orientation from the central core is observed, in the long branched nanoparticles, obtained when using a lower amount of seeds, the 3D structure suggests that secondary branching occurred on few spikes that were initially grown from the core. This cannot be observed in conventional TEM projection images, so HAADF-STEM tomography is an essential tool to understand this type of system. Tomography was also used to image the Janus nanostars after dissolution of the silica shell, again clearly showing a highly branched side, which is well differentiated from a quasi-spherical side (see Fig. S7, ESI).


image file: c3cc47531j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 HAADF-STEM images used for tomographic reconstruction acquired at different angles and the corresponding rendered 3D reconstructions along different directions, showing the Au parts in yellow and the SiO2 shells in blue, for two different Au–SiO2 Janus stars (left: short branches; right: large branches).

A final piece of information regarding the ultrastructure of these unusual nanoparticles was provided by high resolution HAADF-STEM, as exemplified in Fig. 3. A HAADF-STEM image of a single Au–SiO2 Janus star with small branches is shown in Fig. 3A, revealing the presence of a spherical gold core from which spikes protrude (bright areas) and a silica semishell (faint grey area). A more detailed image of the same particle in Fig. 3B indicates that the gold core is multiply twinned, as expected for such large quasi-spherical particles, whereas the images in Fig. 3C and D show the branching part from the core for several spikes, indicating that they are single crystalline. Paying more attention to the edge of the spike in Fig. 3D, deviation from the zone axis orientation can be seen, so highly branched particles might exhibit different crystallographic orientations where secondary spikes grow over previous branches. A similar analysis was carried out on particles with larger branches (see Fig. S8, ESI), but in this case the overlap between different parts of the particles makes it difficult to distinguish the corresponding crystallographic orientations.


image file: c3cc47531j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (A) HAADF-STEM image of a single Au–SiO2 Janus nanostar with short spikes, revealing the presence of a gold core with branches (brighter features) and also a SiO2 shell at one side of the particle (faint grey area). (B–D) HRSTEM images of the same particle showing that the Au core is multi-twinned, whereas the branches are single crystals.

Regarding the optical response of these anisotropic nanostructures, the Vis-NIR spectra of colloids obtained with different amounts of seeds (Fig. S2, ESI) show that the main plasmon band is more redshifted for lower amounts of seeds, which is in good correlation with the growth of longer branches, as previously reported.18,21,22 It should be noted that the amount of seeds is also a critical parameter to optimize branched growth without secondary nucleation. Closer attention to the Vis-NIR spectra reveals that they comprise two localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) bands,18 which is typical for star-like nanoparticles. The LSPR mode at around 540 nm depends on the core size, in this case determined by the original Janus seeds, whereas the second mode is localized at the tips and its position can be tuned between 700 and 850 nm by simply changing the amount of seeds (and in turn branch dimensions). Other parameters such as the addition of HCl or the amount of Ag+ ions can also modify the morphology and affect the LSPR position, but we have found that tuning the concentration of the seeds is a more reliable and reproducible strategy. When comparing these spectra with those of standard Au nanostars, it seems that the relative intensities between tip to core LSPR modes are lower in the Janus nanostars, which can be due to the smaller amount of branches per particle compared to standard nanostars. This agrees with theoretical modelling indicating that the intensity of the tip mode is proportional to the number of spikes.18

In summary, we have demonstrated application of the protecting group concept for the synthesis of Janus nanoparticles comprising a spherical gold core half covered with a silica semishell and with gold tips branching out from the other half. Advances in the colloidal synthesis of Janus particles allowed us to deposit silica half shells on metallic spheres, which were then used as hard masks to prevent the growth of gold spikes over the whole surface. The mask can be easily removed by dissolving silica in aqueous solution, thus completing the similarity with protecting groups in organic chemistry. These particles exhibit optical properties similar to those of gold nanostars in solution, but enhanced anisotropy can be expected for oriented assemblies by exploiting the Janus conformation. We have also shown that aberration corrected HAADF-STEM imaging and tomography are essential tools to disclose the Janus morphology. Applications can be envisaged in e.g. surface enhanced spectroscopies or in the design of colloidal swimmers.

This work was supported by the EU (ESMI, grant number FP7-INFRASTRUCT-2010-1, 262348) and the European Research Council (PLASMAQUO, 267867 and COLOURATOMS, 335078). D.R.-F. acknowledges an FPU fellowship from the Spanish MECD. The authors thank Dr M. Grzelczak for useful suggestions.

Notes and references

  1. G. M. Wuts and T. W. Greene, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 4th edn, 2007 Search PubMed.
  2. A. Perro, S. Reculusa, F. Pereira, M.-H. Delville, C. Mingotaud, E. Duguet, E. Bourgeat-Lamid and S. Ravaine, Chem. Commun., 2005, 5542 RSC.
  3. X. Xu, N. L. Rosi, Y. Wang, F. Huo and C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 9286 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. M. M. Maye, D. Nykypanchuk, M. Cuisinier, D. van der Lelie and O. Gang, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 388 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. F. Wang, S. Cheng, Z. Bao and J. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1 CrossRef.
  6. A. Guerrero-Martínez, M. Grzelczak and L. M. Liz-Marzán, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 3655 CrossRef PubMed.
  7. A. Guerrero-Martínez, S. Barbosa, I. Pastoriza-Santos and L. M. Liz-Marzán, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2011, 16, 118 CrossRef PubMed.
  8. D. Rodríguez-Fernández and L. M. Liz Marzán, Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 2013, 30, 46 CrossRef.
  9. N. G. Bastús, J. Comenge and V. Puntes, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 11098 CrossRef PubMed.
  10. G. Frens, Nat. Phys. Sci., 1973, 241, 20 CrossRef CAS.
  11. T. Chen, G. Chen, S. Xing, T. Wu and H. Chen, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 3826 CrossRef CAS.
  12. L. M. Liz Marzán, M. Giersig and P. Mulvaney, Langmuir, 1996, 12, 4329 CrossRef.
  13. H. Yuan, C. G. Khoury, H. Hwang, C. M. Wilson, G. A. Grant and T. Vo-Dinh, Nanotechnology, 2012, 23, 075102 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. S. Chen, Z. L. Wang, J. Ballato, S. H. Foulger and D. L. Carroll, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 16186 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. E. Hao, R. C. Bailey, G. C. Schatz, J. T. Hupp and S. Li, Nano Lett., 2004, 4, 327 CrossRef CAS.
  16. T. K. Sau and C. J. Murphy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 8648 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. J. Xie, J. Y. Lee and D. I. C. Wang, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 2823 CrossRef CAS.
  18. P. S. Kumar, I. Pastoriza-Santos, B. Rodríguez-González, F. J. García de Abajo and L. M. Liz-Marzán, Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, 015606 CrossRef PubMed.
  19. L. Rodríguez-Lorenzo, J. M. Romo-Herrera, J. Pérez-Juste, R. A. Álvarez-Puebla and L. M. Liz-Marzán, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 11544 RSC.
  20. Y. J. Wong, L. Zhu, W. S. Teo, Y. W. Tan, Y. Yang, C. Wang and H. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11422 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. F. Hao, C. L. Nehl, J. H. Hafner and P. Nordlander, Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 729 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. W. Y. Ma, H. Yang, J. P. Hilton, Q. Lin, J. Y. Liu, L. X. Huang and J. Yao, Opt. Express, 2010, 18, 843 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, additional TEM images and Vis-NIR spectra, and control experiments See DOI: 10.1039/c3cc47531j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014