Facile synthesis of P-doped carbon quantum dots with highly efficient photoluminescence

Jin Zhou, Xiaoyue Shan, Juanjuan Ma, Yamin Gu, Zhaosheng Qian, Jianrong Chen and Hui Feng*
College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China. E-mail: fenghui@zjnu.cn; Fax: +86-579-82282269; Tel: +86-579-82282269

Received 23rd September 2013 , Accepted 10th December 2013

First published on 11th December 2013


Abstract

P-doped carbon quantum dots (PCQDs) were synthesized by a solvent-thermal method using phosphorous tribromide and hydroquinone as precursors. The as-prepared PCQDs present strong visible fluorescence with quantum yield up to 25%. The toxicity and bioimaging experiments showed that PCQDs have low cell toxicity and excellent biolabeling ability.


Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have been considered as promising materials in photovoltaics, sensors, bioimaging and photocatalysts due to their fascinating properties.1,2 From the viewpoint of fluorescent materials, CQDs have superiorities in terms of chemical inertness, lack of blinking, low toxicity and excellent biocompatibility relative to traditional organic dyes and semiconductor quantum dots.3 Although much advance has been achieved in CQDs preparation,4 there are still some obstacles including the low quantum yields and shifting emission as excitation wavelength of as-synthesized CQDs to hinder their potential biological applications. Most present studies focused on surface passivation of carbon dots obtained by oxidation with macromolecule organic molecule to gain strong photoluminescence.5 However, such modification is often not environmentally friendly, and the acquisition of pure CQDs is often complicated due to necessary removal of a great deal of salts resulted.

Usually, doping carbon nanomaterials with heteroatoms is an effective method which can tune their intrinsic properties.6 There has been much progress in doping carbon nanomaterials with heteroatoms such as nitrogen and boron that the doping of heteroatoms promoted their properties.7,8 The N atom has been used for chemical doping with CQDs.9 Although phosphorus atom is larger than carbon atom, it has been shown that phosphorous can form substitutional defects in diamond sp3 thin films, behaving as an n-type donor and thereby modifying the electronic and optical properties.10 In view of the remarkable quantum-confinement and edge effects of carbon quantum dots, doping CQDs with P atoms could alter their electronic characteristics and offer more active sites, thus producing new and unexpected properties.

In the communication, we proposed a simple and efficient route to prepare phosphorus atom doped carbon quantum dots (PCQDs) with strong photoluminescence through solvent-thermal reaction. The PCQDs were synthesized by solvent-thermal reaction between phosphorous bromide and hydroquinone with different ratios under 200 °C in a Teflon-lined vessel. The as-prepared PCQDs present strong blue fluorescence with quantum yield up to 25%. In order to explore the role of doped phosphorus in the CQDs, pristine CQDs without doped phosphorus were also prepared using the same method with CCl4 and hydroquinone as precursors. Fig. 1 showed the typical TEM images of PCQDs as well as the as-prepared pristine CQDs for comparison. It is found that the diameters of PCQDs are mainly distributed in the range of 5–15 nm while the CQDs is well-dispersed with a narrow size distribution of 3–5 nm. No substantial differences in shape between them could be detected. HR-TEM image of PCQDs shown in Fig. 1C displayed the discernible crystalline lattice structures. The spacing of adjacent lattice planes is about 3.0 Å, close to the (002) diffraction planes of graphite.9 Its crystal-like structure was also verified by Raman spectroscopy (Fig. S1), in which the peak at 1590 cm−1 is very close to that resulted from E2g vibration mode of graphite.


image file: c3ra45294h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The TEM images of as-prepared PCQDs (A), pristine CQDs (B) and HRTEM image of PCQDs (C).

As shown in Fig. 2, both XPS spectra of pristine CQDs and PCQDs displayed predominant C1s peak at 284.8 eV and O1s peak at 531.8 eV. There are obvious P2s and P2p peaks in the XPS spectra of PCQDs located at 190.8 eV and 133.8 eV respectively, indicating the successful doping of P atoms. As shown in Fig 2C, the peak of P2p at 133.7 eV and 134.9 eV can be assigned to P–O and P–Br bonds respectively according to the ref. 11 and 12. In Fig. 2D, oxygen 1s core level peaks appeared at 531.7 eV and 533 eV, 534 eV which are assigned to the oxygen components in adsorbed oxygen, P–O bond and –OH.11,12 These XPS results confirmed the incorporation of P atoms into CQDs. The elemental analysis indicated the composition of the P 8.5%, O 24.2% and C 65.4% for PCQDs (Table 1).


image file: c3ra45294h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Selected regions of XPS spectra of CQDs (A) and PCQDs (B). The enlarged regions for P2p and O1s of PCQDs (C and D).
Table 1 Concentration of C, O, P and halogen in the CQDs samples as determined by XPS
Samples C (wt%) O (wt%) X (wt%) P (wt%)
a The value represents Cl concentration in CQDs.b The value represents Br concentration in PCQDs.c The PCQDs-3 sample.
CQDs 67.8 26.8 5.4a
PCQDsc 65.4 24.2 1.9b 8.5


The PCQDs obtained at different reaction times and different ratios of precursors exhibited strong blue fluorescence whereas pristine CQDs showed a weak green fluorescence under UV lamp. As shown in Fig. 3, pristine CQDs presented an emission band with the central wavelength of 440 nm. PCQDs synthesized with the radio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 PBr3 and quinol and one hour's reaction time have a narrow emission band with the central wavelength of 368 nm. When the ratio of PBr3 and quinol was changed to 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, the position of emission band of obtained PCQDs has no obvious shift comparing with the radio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 PBr3 and quinol. The photoluminescence spectroscopy of PCQDs obtained with the radio of 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 PBr3 and quinol with different reaction times of 1, 3, 5 and 9 hours were also determined. Fluorescence and UV-Vis spectra of all samples were displayed in Fig. S2–S6. From Fig. 3, one can see that the emission peaks shifted obviously with the change of reaction times, which indicated the distinct influence of reaction time on the obtained PCQDs. Comparing the different samples, the PCQDs-3 has the strong fluorescence with quantum yield of approximately 25.1% in ethanol which is much higher than that of the pristine CQDs of 3.4%. The quantum yield of PCQDs-3 is 17.7% in water solution and thus is expected to be used in biological imaging. According to their lifetimes listed in Table 2, it is inferred that the photoluminescence of PCQDs belongs to fluorescence. Their fluorescence time-resolved decay curves are displayed in Fig. S7. The stability in water solution and performance of resistance to photobleaching in water solution was also investigated as shown in Fig. S8 and S9. It can be seen that PCQDs show good stability to photodegradation, but their performance of resistance to photobleaching is not as good as CQDs in water due to possible chemical activity of P atoms.


image file: c3ra45294h-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Fluorescence spectra of CQDs and PCQDs. PCQDs-1 represents P-doped CQDs synthesized with the radio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 PBr3 and quinol and a hour's reaction time; PCQDs-2, PCQDs-3, PCQDs-4 and PCQDs-5 represent P-doped CQDs obtained with the ratio of 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 PBr3 and quinol and different reaction times of 1, 3, 5 and 9 hours respectively. Inset: the fluorescence images of PCQDs-3 (A) and CQDs (B).
Table 2 The fluorescence quantum yields and lifetimes of CQDs and P-doped CQDs
Sample λex (nm) Φfa (%) τb (ns)
a The fluorescence quantum yields in ethanol at their respective excitation wavelength.b The average lifetimes.c From ref. 13.d Quantum yields for PCQDs-3.
CQDsc 368 3.4 8.4
PCQDs 372 25.1d 5.0


Comparing with pristine CQDs, quantum yield of PCQDs was greatly improved, which indicated doping P atoms into CQDs is an effective method to achieve the fluorescence enhancement of CQDs. However, the underlying fluorescence enhancement mechanism by P atoms is still an open question. Until now, the intrinsic luminescence mechanism of carbon dots has not been entirely understood.14 We discussed the possible fluorescence mechanism of carbon-based nanomaterials with combined experimental and theoretical methods.15 It is supposed that the coexistence of defect sites and isolated sp2 carbon clusters may more efficiently increase the band gap into UV-Vis light regions, and give rise to stronger visible fluorescence than the existence of single sp2 carbon clusters. The fluorescence enhancement may also originate from the isolated sp2 carbon clusters because addition of phosphorus into CQDs causes more isolated sp2 carbon clusters, and the number of these clusters increases with the introduction of more phosphorus atoms. However, there may be another possibility that the formed defects give rise to fluorescence and more defects enhance the fluorescence. Our results suggested that doping of P atoms into CQDs provided a simple and effective approach to tune the emission and elevate the quantum yield of carbon dots.

To assess the possible cellular toxicity brought by doped P atoms, in vitro cytotoxicity of PCQDs was evaluated with human Hela cells by methylthiazolyl-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as shown in Fig. 4. Results suggested that PCQDs showed relative low toxicity to human Hela cells with cell viability of higher than 75% when their contents remain below 100 μg mL−1. Comparing with toxicity effect of CQDs on human Hela cells shown in Fig. S10, the biocompatibility of PCQDs is not as good as that of CQDs in this work, however, their low toxicity is comparable to that of carbon dots reported in the previous papers.16 We also tested their ability to label the cells as shown in Fig. 5. The Hela cells without CQDs are dark and shows nearly no fluorescence signal as shown in Fig. S11. Results showed that PCQDs easily went into cytoplasm through cell wall and clearly labeled the area of cytoplasm. Comparing with bioimaging ability of CQDs depicted in Fig. S12, the labelled area with PCQDs is much brighter than that with CQDs because of higher emission efficiency of PCQDs than CQDs, suggesting that stronger capability of bioimaging of PCQDs than CQDs.


image file: c3ra45294h-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Effect of PCQDs on human Hela cells.

image file: c3ra45294h-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of human Hela cells labeled by PCQDs. Images for A and B were captured in bright field and at excitation wavelength of 355 nm respectively.

In summary, we developed a simple and effective method to synthesize phosphorus atom doped carbon quantum dots with highly efficient fluorescence. The doping of phosphorus atoms can tune the emission band and improve the emission efficiency of carbon dots. The toxicity and bioimaging experiments showed that P-doped CQDs have low cell toxicity and excellent biolabeling ability. P-doped CQDs could alter their electronic characteristics and offer more active sites, thus are expected to produce new properties and potential applications in catalysis and photovoltaic device.

We are thankful for finding projects (21005073, 21275131, 21275130, LY13B050001, LQ13B050002 and Y201225601).

Notes and references

  1. J. H. Shen, Y. H. Zhu, X. L. Yang and C. Z. Li, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686 RSC; H. T. Li, Z. H. Kang, Y. Liu and S.-T. Lee, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 24230 RSC.
  2. S. N. Baker and G. A. Baker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 6726 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. S. T. Yang, L. Cao, P. G. Luo, F. S. Lu, X. Wang, H. F. Wang, M. J. Meziani, Y. F. Liu, G. Qi and Y. P. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 11308 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. X. Y. Xu, R. Ray, Y. L. Gu, H. J. Ploehn, L. Gearheart, K. Raker and W. A. Scrivens, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 12736 CrossRef CAS PubMed; J. G. Zhou, C. Booker, R. Y. Li, X. T. Zhou, T. K. Sham, X. L. Sun and Z. F. Ding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 744 CrossRef PubMed; L. Y. Zheng, Y. W. Chi, Y. Q. Dong, J. P. Lin and B. B. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4564 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. Y. P. Sun, B. Zhou, Y. Lin, W. Wang, K. A. S. Fernando, P. Pathak, M. J. Meziani, B. A. Harruff, X. Wang, H. F. Wang, P. J. G. Luo, H. Yang, M. E. Kose, B. L. Chen, L. M. Veca and S. Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 7756 CrossRef CAS PubMed; D. Y. Pan, J. C. Zhang, Z. Li, C. Wu, X. M. Xiu and M. H. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3681 RSC.
  6. Y. C. Lin, C. Y. Lin and P. W. Chiu, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2010, 96, 133110 CrossRef CAS PubMed; H. T. Liu, Y. Q. Liu and D. B. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 3335 RSC; L. Ma, H. Hu, L. Y. Zhu and J. H. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 6195 Search PubMed.
  7. H. Wang, T. Maiyalagan and X. Wang, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 781 CrossRef CAS; D. Yu, E. Nagelli, F. Du and L. Dai, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1, 2165 CrossRef; K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock and L. Dai, Science, 2009, 323, 760 CrossRef PubMed.
  8. L. Zhao, R. He, K. T. Rim, T. Schiros, K. S. Kim, H. Zhou, C. Gutiérrez, S. P. Chockalingam, C. J. Arguello, L. Pálova, D. Nordlund, M. S. Hybertsen, D. R. Reichman, T. F. Heinz, P. Kim, A. Pinczuk, G. W. Flynn and A. N. Pasupathy, Science, 2011, 333, 999 CrossRef CAS PubMed; X. Wang, X. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Yoon, P. K. Weber, H. Wang, J. Guo and H. Dai, Science, 2009, 324, 768 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. Y. Q. Zhang, D. K. Ma, Y. Zhuang, X. Zhang, W. Chen, L. L. Hong, Q. X. Yan, K. Yu and S. M. Huang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 16714 RSC.
  10. H. Sternschulte, K. Thonke, R. Sauer and S. Koizumi, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1999, 59, 12924 CrossRef CAS.
  11. J. F. Moulder, W. F. Stickle, P. E. Sobel and K. D. Bomben, Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS data, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1992 Search PubMed.
  12. Z. W. Liu, F. Peng, H. J. Wang, H. Yu, W. X. Zheng and J. Yang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3257 CrossRef PubMed.
  13. J. Zhou, P. Lin, J. J. Ma, X. Y. Shan, H. Feng, C. C. Chen, J. R. Chen and Z. S. Qian, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 9625 RSC.
  14. J. G. Zhou, C. Booker, R. Y. Li, X. T. Zhou, T.-K. Sham, X. L. Sun and Z. F. Ding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 744 CrossRef CAS PubMed; Y.-P. Sun, B. Zhou, Y. Lin, W. Wang, K. A. S. Fernando, P. Pathak, M. J. Meziani, B. A. Harruff, X. Wang, H. F. Wang, P. G. Luo, H. Yang, M. E. Kose, B. L. Chen, L. M. Veca and S.-Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 7756 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. Z. S. Qian, J. Zhou, J. J. Ma, X. Y. Shan, C. C. Chen, J. R. Chen and H. Feng, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 307 RSC.
  16. S.-T. Yang, X. Wang, H. F. Wang, F. S. Lu, P. G. Luo, L. Cao, M. J. Meziani, J.-H. Liu, Y. F. Liu, Y. P. Huang and Y.-P. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 18110 Search PubMed; S. J. Zhu, J. H. Zhang, C. Y. Qian, S. J. Tang, Y. F. Li, W. J. Yuan, B. Li, L. Tian, F. Liu, R. Hu, H. N. Gao, H. T. Wei, H. Zhang, H. C. Sun and B. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6858 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: XPS, fluorescence spectra and experimental details. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ra45294h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.