Novel sphingosine-containing analogues selectively inhibit sphingosine kinase (SK) isozymes, induce SK1 proteasomal degradation and reduce DNA synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells

Hoe-Sup Byun; Susan Pyne; Neil MacRitchie; Nigel J. Pyne; Robert Bittman

doi:10.1039/C3MD00201B

View PDF VersionPrevious ArticleNext Article

Open Access Article

This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

DOI: 10.1039/C3MD00201B (Concise Article) Med. Chem. Commun., 2013, 4, 1394-1399

Show CompoundsShow Chemical Terms

Novel sphingosine-containing analogues selectively inhibit sphingosine kinase (SK) isozymes, induce SK1 proteasomal degradation and reduce DNA synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells†

Hoe-Sup Byun^a, Susan Pyne^b, Neil MacRitchie^b, Nigel J. Pyne^b and Robert Bittman*^a
^aDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College, The City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367-1597, USA. E-mail: robert.bittman@qc.cuny.edu; Tel: +1 718-997-3279
^bCell Biology Group, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK

Received 16th July 2013 , Accepted 5th August 2013

First published on 6th August 2013

Abstract

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is involved in hyper-proliferative diseases such as cancer and pulmonary arterial hypertension. We have synthesized inhibitors that are selective for the two isoforms of sphingosine kinase (SK1 and SK2) that catalyze the synthesis of S1P. A thiourea adduct of sphinganine (F02) is selective for SK2 whereas the 1-deoxysphinganines 55-21 and 77-7 are selective for SK1. (2S,3R)-1-Deoxysphinganine (55-21) induced the proteasomal degradation of SK1 in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells and inhibited DNA synthesis, while the more potent SK1 inhibitors PF-543 and VPC96091 failed to inhibit DNA synthesis. These findings indicate that moderate potency inhibitors such as 55-21 are likely to have utility in unraveling the functions of SK1 in inflammatory and hyperproliferative disorders.

Introduction

Sphingosine kinase (SK), which catalyzes the conversion of sphingosine (Sph) to sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), exists as two isoforms, SK1 and SK2. The isoforms are encoded by distinct genes and differ in their biochemical properties, subcellular localization, and function.¹ There is accumulating evidence that SK1 is involved in hyperproliferative diseases; for instance, SK1 mRNA transcript and/or protein expression are increased in various human tumors.² Moreover, siRNA knockdown of SK1 reduces proliferation of glioblastoma cells³ and androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells.⁴ Sustained hypoxia increases SK1 expression in proliferating human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMC), which might contribute to their increased survival⁵ and vascular remodeling in pulmonary arterial hypertension. There is also evidence that SK2 may play an important role in cancer. For example, siRNA knockdown of SK2 enhances doxorubicin-induced apoptosis of breast or colon cancer cells⁶ and reduces cancer cell proliferation and migration/invasion.⁷

As SK1 and SK2 are potential and promising targets for cancer chemoprevention, a number of SK inhibitors have been prepared in order to reduce cancer cell survival but only very few have been found to be isoform selective. For example, (2R,3S,4E)-N-methyl-5-(4′-pentylphenyl)-2-amino-4-pentene-1,3-diol (commonly referred to as SK1-I and BML-258) is a selective SK1 inhibitor that enhances the survival of mice in an orthotopic intracranial tumor model.⁸ An analogue of the oral multiple sclerosis drug FTY720 (Gilenya™), (2R)-2-amino-2-(methoxymethyl)-4-(4′-n-octylphenyl)butan-1-ol ((R)-FTY720-OMe, ROME), is a selective, enantioselective, competitive (with Sph) inhibitor of SK2.⁹ Treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cells with ROME abrogates the enrichment of actin into lamellipodia in response to S1P.⁹ Another SK2-selective inhibitor is the nonlipid molecule 4-pyridinemethyl 3-(4′-chlorophenyl)-adamantane-1-carboxamide (ABC294640), which is also a competitive (with Sph) inhibitor of SK2 activity. ABC294640 reduces formation of intracellular S1P in cancer cells and prevents tumor progression in mice with mammary adenocarcinoma xenografts.¹⁰ The K_i values for inhibition of SK2 by (R)-FTY720-OMe and ABC294640 are very similar (16.5 μM vs. 10 μM, respectively).^9,10 Recently, 3-(2-amino-ethyl)-5-[3-(4-butoxyl-phenyl)-propylidene]-thiazolidine-2,4-dione (K145) was identified as a selective inhibitor of SK2.¹¹ This compound reduced S1P levels, inhibited growth and suppressed ERK/AKT signaling in U937 cells and inhibited tumor growth in vivo.¹¹

Diastereomers of diverse saturated sphingoid bases such as sphinganine,¹² safingol (L-threo-sphinganine, the first putative SK1 inhibitor to enter a phase I trial),¹³ fumonisin B1,¹⁴ spisulosine ((2S,3R)-1-deoxysphinganine, ES-285),¹⁵ enigmols (1-deoxy-3,5-dihydroxysphinganines),¹⁶ and phytosphingosine (PHS)¹⁷ were found to disrupt the normal biosynthesis of various signaling sphingolipids and to possess pro-apoptotic properties via multiple mechanisms in numerous cell types. In previous work, we showed that N-phenethylisothiocyanate derivatives of sphingosine and sphinganine have a higher cytotoxic activity to HL-60 leukemic cells than sphinganine and safingol.¹⁸ These findings suggest that adducts of synthetic saturated sphingoid bases may be putative inhibitors of either or both SK isoforms. In this communication, we report the synthesis of a series of saturated D-erythro long-chain bases and an assessment of their ability to inhibit the two isoforms of SK. Our data have identified new isoform-selective SK inhibitors, of which 55-21 is also able to induce proteasomal degradation of SK1 and reduce DNA synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMC).

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows the structures of the 1-deoxysphingoid bases 55-21, 55-22, 77-7, and 77-13; the thiourea-sphinganine bases F01 and F02; the 4-sphingenine (sphingosine) adducts 67-320 and 67-330; the thiourea adduct of 2-epi-pachastrissamine¹⁹ 67-341; and the thiourea-PHS derivatives 67-301, 67-306, 67-310, and the urea-PHS derivative 67-311.


	Fig. 1 Structures of sphingoid bases evaluated as SK inhibitors.

Scheme 1 outlines the preparation of 1-deoxysphinganine analogues 55-21 and 55-22 via cyclic sulfate intermediates of (2S,3R)-2-azidosphinganine. Azidoester 1 was prepared by asymmetric dihydroxylation of ethyl octadecenoate using AD-mix-β ((DHQD)₂PHAL), followed by conversion to a cyclic sulfate intermediate and regioselective azidation with sodium azide in aqueous acetone as described previously.²⁰ Reduction of ester 1 with NaBH₄ gave 2-azido-1,3-diol 2, which was converted to the 2-azido-1,3-cyclic sulfate intermediate 3 by reaction with SOCl₂ in the presence of pyridine, followed by oxidation of resulting cyclic sulfite with catalytic RuO₄. Without further purification, 3 was subjected to reduction with sodium borohydride in DMF in the presence of sodium iodide, which removed the primary hydroxyl group and reduced the azide, affording (2S,3R)-2-amino-3-octadecanol (55-21) in 79% yield. The reaction of 55-21 with formaldehyde in the presence of NaBH₃CN in MeOH furnished the N,N-dimethylamino derivative 55-22 in 82% yield. N-Methylation of 55-22 with methyl tosylate in THF gave the N,N,N-trimethylammonium tosylate salt, 77-13.


	Scheme 1 Synthesis of 1-deoxysphingoid derivatives 55-21, 55-22, and 77-13 via cyclic sulfate chemistry. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaBH₄, THF, MeOH, −78 °C – rt; (b) SOCl₂, py, CH₂Cl₂, −78 °C, 2 h, then rt, 2 h; (c) cat. RuCl₃·3H₂O, NaIO₄, MeCN/H₂O (5:1), rt, 2 h; (d) NaBH₄ (2 equiv.), NaI (1 equiv.), DMF, 0 °C – rt, 48 h, then aq. HCl (79%); (e) CH₂O (10 equiv.), NaBH₃CN (11 equiv.), MeOH, 0 °C – rt, 48 h (82%); (f) p-TsOMe, THF, rt, overnight (100%).

As shown in Scheme 2, the synthesis of oxyspisulosine analog 77-7, which contains an oxygen atom in the aliphatic chain, started with rac-1-O-tetradecylglycerol (4).²¹ Oxidative cleavage of vicinal diol 4 with NaIO₄ afforded aldehyde 5. HWE reaction of 5 with (EtO)₂P(O)CH₂CO₂Et in aqueous 2-propanol the presence of K₂CO₃ afforded (E)-α,β-unsaturated ester 6 with good E selectivity. Asymmetric dihydroxylation of ester 6 with AD-mix-β proceeded smoothly, providing chiral 2,3-diol ester 7 in 89% yield. Conversion of diol 7 to cyclic sulfate intermediate 8, followed by regioselective azidation gave azidoester 9, and reduction of the ester functionality in 9 with NaBH₄ gave 2-azido1,3-diol 10. We next attempted to remove the primary hydroxyl group from 1,3-diol 10 by the cyclic sulfate methodology shown in Scheme 1. However, when the cyclic sulfate of 10 was reduced with NaBH₄ we found that the oxygen atom in the aliphatic chain affected the regioselectivity of the reduction, resulting in a mixture of primary and secondary alcohols that was difficult to purify. Therefore, we devised a novel route involving a dibutylstannane intermediate (11) to synthesize 77-7 (Scheme 2). Reaction of 10 with dibutyltin oxide followed by tosylation of 11 gave intermediate 12, which was converted to 77-6b in two steps and 66% overall yield from 10. In contrast to the reduction of 3, the azido group was not completely reduced even in DMF at elevated temperature. Therefore, catalytic hydrogenolysis was necessary to complete the reduction of tosylate 12.


	Scheme 2 Synthesis of 1-deoxysphingoid derivative 77-7 via dibutylstannane-mediated monotosylation of 1,3-diol 10. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaIO₄, THF/H₂O, 0 °C – rt, 2 h; (b) (EtO)₂P(O)CH₂CO₂Et, K₂CO₃, 2-PrOH/H₂O (1:1), 0 °C – rt, overnight; (c) AD-mix β, MeSO₂NH₂, t-BuOH/H₂O (1:1), rt; (d) SOCl₂, py, CH₂Cl₂, 0 °C; (e) cat. RuCl₃·3H₂O, NaIO₄, MeCN/H₂O (5:2); (f) NaN₃ (3 equiv.), Me₂CO/H₂O (2:1), then Et₂O, aq. H₂SO₄; (g) NaBH₄, THF/MeOH (100:1), 0 °C – rt; (h) Bu₂SnO, toluene, reflux; (i) p-TsCl, CH₂Cl₂, 0 °C – rt, overnight; (j) NaBH₄, THF, 0 °C – rt; (k) Pd(OH)₂/C, MeOH, rt; (l) CH₂O, NaBH₃CN (12.5 equiv.), MeOH, 0 °C – rt, 48 h (80%).

The N-arylthiourea and -arylurea derivatives were prepared by the addition of the amino group of Sph, sphinganine, or D-ribo-PHS to the electrophilic carbon of an aryl isothiocyanate or aryl cyanate in CHCl₃/CH₃OH (1 [thin space (1/6-em)] :1) (ESI†). 67-341 was prepared from 2-epi-pachastrissamine (15)¹⁹ and pentafluorophenyl isothiocyanate. Cyclic amine 15 was obtained by regioselective tosylation of trifluoroacetamido-D-ribo-PHS 14 followed by hydrolysis of the N-protecting group with NaOH in MeOH (Scheme 3). Thiourea derivatives F-01 and F-02 were prepared by the reaction of sphinganine with an aryl isothiocyanate (ESI†).


	Scheme 3 Synthesis of 67-341, a thiourea derivative of 2-epi-pachastrissamine. Reaction conditions: (a) CF₃CO₂Et, MeOH, rt, overnight (95%); (b) p-TsCl (1.1 equiv.), py/CH₂Cl₂ (1:1), 0 °C – rt (80%); (c) NaOH, MeOH, reflux, 3 h (100%); (d) C₆F₅NCS.

We assessed the effects of fluorine and trifluoromethyl substitution in the benzene ring of the putative inhibitors (Fig. 2). The N-(4-fluorophenyl)thiourea-PHS derivative 67-301 is a weak and nonselective SK inhibitor, but effectiveness for SK1 versus SK2 is improved by insertion of five fluorine atoms into the benzene ring to afford 67-306, albeit the inhibition remains moderate. Thiourea 67-310 and urea 67-311, which are both p-trifluoromethylphenyl PHS derivatives, are moderately effective SK2 inhibitors (64.5 ± 4.9% and 53.9 ± 0.9% inhibition at 50 μM, respectively). Notably, the N-(4-fluorophenyl)thiourea-Sph derivative 67-320 is a more effective SK2 inhibitor (79.2 ± 1.9% inhibition at 50 μM) whereas its p-trifluoromethylphenyl analogue 67-330 is a weak inhibitor of both SK isoforms. The cyclic N-(pentafluorophenyl)thioureido derivative 67-341 is a more effective SK1 inhibitor (64.7 ± 5.3% inhibition at 50 μM). Sphinganine thiourea derivative F-02 is more effective for SK2 (80 ± 2% inhibition at 50 μM), but its analogue F-01 is less effective. 1-Deoxysphinganine analog 55-21 and its N,N-dimethyl derivative 55-22 are more effective SK1 inhibitors. Insertion of an oxygen atom into the aliphatic chain afforded 77-7, which is also an effective SK1 inhibitor; however, the N,N,N-trimethylammonium salt 77-13 is a nonselective SK inhibitor.


	Fig. 2 Effect of inhibitors on SK1 or SK2 activity (n = 3 for each compound, mean of % control ± S.D.). Compounds were used at 50 μM. The Sph concentrations were 3 and 10 μM, corresponding to the K_m values of SK1 and SK2, respectively.^9,22 BML-258 at 50 μM inhibited SK1 activity by 74.5 ± 3.3%. The control is set at 100% and denotes the activity against Sph alone.

To further establish the selectivity for SK1 or SK2 of the most effective compounds identified above, we determined the relative IC₅₀ values for F-02, 55-21, and 77-7. As shown in Fig. 3A, F-02 inhibited SK2 activity with an IC₅₀ of 21.8 ± 4.2 μM and SK1 activity with an IC₅₀ of 69 ± 5.5 μM. Fig. 3B shows that 55-21 inhibited SK1 activity with an IC₅₀ of 7.1 ± 0.75 μM and SK2 activity with an IC₅₀ of 766 ± 133 μM. 77-7 inhibited SK1 activity with an IC₅₀ of 27.8 ± 3.2 μM and SK2 activity with an IC₅₀ of 300 ± 62.3 μM (Fig. 4).


	Fig. 3 Concentration-dependent inhibition of (A) SK2 activity (upper graph) and SK1 activity (lower graph) by F-02; (B) SK1 activity (upper graph) and SK2 activity (lower graph) by 55-21. Results are expressed as mean of % control ± S.D. of control (n = 3–6); the control is set to 100% and represents the activity with Sph in the absence of inhibitor. The Sph concentrations were 3 and 10 μM, corresponding to the K_m of SK1 and SK2, respectively; (C) effect of 55-21 and F-02 on SK1 expression. PASMC were treated with or without MG132 (10 μM, 30 min) before addition of 55-21 (10 μM, 24 h) or F-02 (10 μM, 24 h). Cell lysates were western blotted with anti-SK1 and anti-actin antibodies. Results are representative of three experiments.


	Fig. 4 Concentration-dependent inhibition of SK1 activity (left graph) and SK2 activity (right graph) by 77-7. Results are expressed as mean of % control ± S.D. of control (n = 3); the control is set to 100% and represents the activity with Sph in the absence of inhibitor. The Sph concentrations were 3 and 10 μM, corresponding to the K_m values of SK1 and SK2, respectively.

Next, the possibility that the compounds that bear a hydroxyl group may also serve as SK substrates was examined. At 50 μM, F01, 77-13, 67-341, and 67-302 are weak substrates of SK1 (ESI†), but probably overlap the Sph binding site in SK1, thereby inhibiting catalytic phosphorylation of Sph. At 50 μM, F02 and F01 were very weak substrates of SK2 but 67-302 (cis-Sph) was efficiently phosphorylated by SK2. None of the other compounds were SK1 or SK2 substrates.

We have previously shown that inhibition of SK activity in cells with the SK inhibitors SKi, N,N-dimethyl-Sph, or FTY720 induces proteasomal degradation and removal of SK1 from PASMC and cancer cell lines.²³ Removal of SK1 in response to SKi reduces intracellular S1P and increases C22:0-ceramide levels, thereby promoting apoptosis.²³ Fig. 3C shows that treatment of PASMC with the SK1-selective inhibitor 55-21 (10 μM, 24 h) reduced the expression of SK1; this was reversed by pre-treatment of the cells with the proteasomal inhibitor MG132. In contrast, treatment of PASMC with the SK2-selective inhibitor F-02 was without effect on SK1 expression, suggesting that changes in ceramide-sphingosine-S1P rheostat regulated by SK2 is not accessible to the proteasome and therefore does not regulate SK1 turnover.

Recent studies have identified new nonlipid SK1 and SK2 inhibitors with nanomolar potency, including PF-543 and VPC96091 (see ESI† for structures).^24,25 We tested the effect of PF-543 on SK1 and SK2 activity. Fig. 5 shows that PF-543 inhibited SK1 activity with an IC₅₀ value of 28 ± 6.15 nM. This is a 10-fold lower potency than previously reported for PF-543.²⁴ In contrast, PF-543 inhibited SK2 activity by 33.3 ± 3.0% at 5 μM and 72. 2 ± 3.4% at 50 μM (n = 3), confirming that this compound is highly selective for SK1 as previously reported.²⁴ Interestingly, we found that treatment of PASMC with 100 nM PF-543 induced a decrease in cellular SK1 expression, which was reversed by the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (Fig. 5). These findings indicate that inhibitor-induced proteasomal degradation of SK1 correlates with a concentration-dependent inhibition of SK1 activity.


	Fig. 5 (A) Concentration-dependent inhibition of SK1 activity with PF-543. Results are expressed as mean of % control ± S.D. of control (n = 3–6); the control is set to 100% and represents the activity with Sph in the absence of inhibitor. The Sph concentration was 3 μM, corresponding to the K_m of SK1. (B) Effect of PF-543 on SK1 expression. PASMC were treated with or without MG132 (10 μM, 30 min) before PF-543 (100 nM, 24 h). Cell lysates were western blotted with anti-SK1 and anti-actin antibodies. Results are representative of three experiments.

VPC96091 was used at the previously reported K_i concentration for SK1 and SK2.²⁵ VPC96091 at 130 nM inhibited SK1 activity by 41.3 ± 3.0% (n = 3), while 1.5 μM VPC96091 inhibited SK2 activity by 73.4 ± 1.5% (n = 3). At 50 μM, VPC96091 abolished SK1 and SK2 activity (data not shown). Therefore, both PF-543 and VPC96091 are more effective inhibitors of SK1 than the new inhibitors presented herein. However, PF-543 and VPC96091 are ineffective at reducing DNA synthesis in PASMC, while 55-21 significantly inhibited DNA synthesis (Fig. 6).


	Fig. 6 Assessment of the effects of PF-543 (10 nM and 100 nM, 24 h), VPC96091 (300 nM, 24 h), and 55-21 (100 nM and 1 μM, 24 h) on [³H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA in PASMC. Results are expressed as mean of % control ± S.D. of control (n = 3); the control is set to 100%. ***p < 0.05 versus control.

Conclusions

In summary, we have identified new SK inhibitors with isoform selectivity. Moreover, inhibition of SK1 with selective SK1 inhibitors, e.g., 55-21 and RB-005,²⁶ is linked with ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of SK1 that might confer enhanced efficacy of these compounds in terms of abrogating SK1 function in cells. In addition, we demonstrate here that 55-21 is effective at reducing DNA synthesis in PASMC, while more potent SK1 inhibitors, such as PF-543 and VPC96091, are not effective. There is substantial evidence to indicate that SK1 has an essential role on regulating cell growth and survival.² For instance, siRNA knockdown of SK1 has been shown to induce ceramide-stimulated apoptosis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells.²⁷ Therefore, while PF-543 and VPC96091 are more effective inhibitors of SK1 compared with 55-21, this enhanced binding affinity might result in a lack of specificity toward other enzymes that can bind sphingosine-based compounds, such as ceramide synthases. This might effectively negate the effect of inhibiting SK1 activity on cell growth and survival by preventing formation of ceramide from sphingosine that has accumulated as a result of inhibiting SK1 activity. Indeed, PF-543 fails to increase endogenous ceramide levels in head and neck 1483 carcinoma cells, where it lacks cytotoxicity.²⁴ The novel compounds identified here, e.g. 55-21, have moderate potency, which might represent a more favorable profile in terms of selectively abrogating SK1 function without exhibiting ‘off-target’ effects on sphingosine/ceramide metabolizing enzymes. In this regard, 55-21 recapitulates siRNA knockdown and genetic studies in terms of reducing cell growth; thus 55-21 is expected to have utility in unraveling the functions of SK1 in inflammatory and hyperproliferative disorders. With the recent elucidation of the atomic structure of SK1,²⁸ it may be possible to define the binding modalities of these inhibitors in the future and to optimize the structures of novel inhibitors to achieve higher potency and selectivity.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a British Heart Foundation grant (29476) to NJP/SP and by NIH Grant HL-083187 to RB. We thank Dr Dong Jae Baek for preparing VPC96091.

Notes and references

For recent reviews on inhibition of SK activity and alteration of S1P signaling, see: (a) S. Pyne, R. Bittman and N. J. Pyne, Cancer Res., 2011, 71, 6576 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. M. Pitson, J. A. Powell and C. S. Bonder, Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem., 2011, 11, 799 CrossRef CAS; (c) K. A. Orr Gandy and L. M. Obeid, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids, 2013, 1831, 157 CrossRef CAS.
S. Pyne and N. J. Pyne, Trends Mol. Med., 2011, 17, 463 CrossRef CAS.
J. R. Van Brocklyn, C. A. Jackson, D. K. Pearl, M. S. Kotur, P. J. Snyder and T. W. Prior, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 2005, 64, 695 CrossRef CAS.
Y. Akao, Y. Banno, Y. Nakagawa, N. Hasegawa, T. J. Kim, T. Murate, Y. Igarashi and Y. Nozawa, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2006, 342, 1284 CrossRef CAS.
M. Ahmad, J. S. Long, N. J. Pyne and S. Pyne, Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediators, 2006, 79, 278 CrossRef CAS.
H. M. Sankala, N. C. Hait, S. W. Paugh, D. Shida, S. Lépine, L. W. Elmore, P. Dent, S. Milstien and S. Spiegel, Cancer Res., 2007, 67, 10466 CrossRef CAS.
P. Gao and C. D. Smith, Mol. Cancer Res., 2011, 9, 1509 CrossRef CAS.
S. W. Paugh, B. S. Paugh, M. Rahmani, D. Kapitonov, J. A. Almenara, T. Kordula, S. Milstien, J. K. Adams, R. E. Zipkin, S. Grant and S. Spiegel, Blood, 2008, 112, 1382 CrossRef CAS.
K. G. Lim, S. Chaode, R. Bittman, N. J. Pyne and S. Pyne, Cell. Signalling, 2011, 23, 1590 CrossRef CAS.
K. J. French, Y. Zhuang, L. W. Maines, P. Gao, W. Wang, V. Beljanski, J. J. Upson, C. L. Green, S. N. Keller and C. D. Smith, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2010, 333, 129 CrossRef CAS.
K. Liu, T. L. Guo, N. C. Hait, J. Allegood, H. I. Parikh, W. Xu, G. E. Kellogg, S. Grant, S. Spiegel and S. Zhang, PLoS One, 2013, 8, e56471 CAS.
W. D. Jarvis, F. A. Fornari Jr, R. S. Traylor, H. A. Martin, L. B. Kramer, R. K. Erukulla, R. Bittman and S. Grant, J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271, 8275 CrossRef CAS.
M. A. Dickson, R. D. Carvajal, A. H. Merrill Jr, M. Gonen, L. M. Cane and G. K. Schwartz, Clin. Cancer Res., 2011, 17, 2484 CrossRef CAS.
J. M. Soriano, L. Gonzales and A. I. Catala, Prog. Lipid Res., 2005, 44, 345 CrossRef CAS.
C. Massard, R. Salazar, J. P. Armand, M. Majem, E. Deutsch, M. García, A. Oaknin, E. M. Fernández-García, A. Soto and J. C. Soria, Invest. New Drugs, 2012, 30, 2318 CrossRef CAS.
H. Symolon, A. Bushnev, Q. Peng, H. Ramaraju, S. G. Mays, J. C. Allegood, S. T. Pruett, M. C. Sullards, D. L. Dillehay, D. C. Liotta and A. H. Merrill Jr, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2011, 10, 648 CrossRef CAS.
H. Stockmann-Juvala and K. Savolainen, Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 2008, 27, 799 CAS.
C. R. Johnson, J. Chun, R. Bittman and W. D. Jarvis, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2004, 309, 452 CrossRef CAS.
Stereoisomers of 4-amino-2-tetradecyltetrahydrofuran-3-ol (pachastrissamines) are inhibitors of SK and protein kinase C; see: Y. Yoshimitsu, S. Oishi, J. Miyagaki, S. Inuki, H. Ohno and N. Fujii, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2011, 19, 5402 CrossRef CAS.
L. He, H.-S. Byun and R. Bittman, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7618 CrossRef CAS.
C. I. Hong, A. Nechaev, A. J. Kirisits, R. Vig, S.-W. Hui and C. R. West, J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 1629 CrossRef CAS.
K. G. Lim, F. Tonelli, Z. Li, X. Lu, R. Bittman, S. Pyne and N. J. Pyne, J. Biol. Chem., 2011, 286, 18633 CrossRef CAS.
C. Loveridge, F. Tonelli, T. Leclercq, K. G. Lim, S. Long, E. Berdyshev, R. J. Tate, V. Natarajan, S. M. Pitson, N. J. Pyne and S. Pyne, J. Biol. Chem., 2010, 285, 38841 CrossRef CAS.
M. E. Schnute, M. D. McReynolds, T. Kasten, M. Yates, G. Jerome, J. W. Rains, T. Hall, J. Chrencik, M. Kraus, C. N. Cronin, M. Saabye, M. K. Highkin, R. Broadus, S. Ogawa, K. Cukyne, L. E. Zawadzke, V. Peterkin, K. Iyanar, J. A. Scholten, J. Wendling, H. Fujiwara, O. Nemirovskiy, A. J. Wittwer and M. M. Nagiec, Biochem. J., 2012, 444, 79 CrossRef CAS.
A. J. Kennedy, T. P. Mathews, Y. Kharel, S. D. Field, M. L. Moyer, J. E. East, J. D. Houck, K. R. Lynch and T. L. Macdonald, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 3524 CrossRef CAS.
D. J. Baek, N. MacRitchie, N. J. Pyne, S. Pyne and R. Bittman, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2136 RSC.
T. A. Taha, K. Kitatani, M. El-Alwani, J. Bielawski, Y. A. Hannun and L. M. Obeid, FASEB J., 2006, 20, 482 CAS.
Z. Wang, X. Min, S. H. Xiao, S. Johnstone, W. Romanow, D. Meininger, H. Xu, J. Liu, J. Dai, S. An, S. Thibault and N. Walker, Structure, 2013, 21, 798 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed synthetic procedures and NMR spectra, and SK assay information. See DOI: 10.1039/c3md00201b

Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.

Novel sphingosine-containing analogues selectively inhibit COMPOUND LINKSRead more about this on ChemSpiderDownload mol file of compoundsphingosine kinase (SK) isozymes, induce SK1 proteasomal degradation and reduce DNA synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells†