News from China

Effect of C60 nanocrystalline dispersion on its photochemical properties1

Considering the wide range of industrial applications of fullerene C60, its release into the aquatic environment and accumulation with other contaminants is inevitable, which has elicited concerns regarding its potential environmental and health effects. It has been reported that the physicochemical properties and the behavior in the environment of nC60 nanoparticles, including the aggregates size, morphology and surface zeta potential, were sensitive to complex hydrological conditions, and they usually vary with changes in conditions, such as alkalinity, ionic strength or contact with other pollutants. That means, the transport and fate of nC60 as well as ecological effects are complicated and largely unknown. Therefore, evaluating the environmental impact of nC60 requires careful and thorough characterization of its physicochemical properties in the natural aqueous environment. The nonionic surfactant (TX100) can induce nC60 to restore photoactivity, according to research published in Chinese Environmental Chemistry (2011, 30, 1534–1538), which makes the mechanisms of C60's transformation and toxicity more complicated.
ugraphic, filename = c2em90052a-u1.gif

The type of surfactant has an important influence on the dispersive–aggregative status of nC60 aggregates, which plays a key role in whether nC60 can have photochemical reactivity, explains Prof. Bo Zhang, an environmental chemist at the School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. In Prof. Zhang's study, FFA, as a scavenger of 1O2, was selected to detect the production of 1O2 by nC60 aggregates in the presence or absence of surfactants under UVA irradiation. The nC60 aggregates and CTAB, SDS, and TX100 solution themselves cannot produce 1O2. The production of 1O2 was observed only in the presence of TX100 above its CMC, while for nC60 aggregates with CTAB and SDS, 1O2 cannot be produced. Both TEM and DLS analysis show the nC60 aggregates in the presence of TX100 become more dispersed with the Zave decreasing to 22 nm, compared to SDS and CTAB. That means restoration of nC60's photochemical reactivity in the presence of TX100 was related to the change in dispersion status of nC60 during this physical interaction process between TX100 and nC60.

Human exposure to nanoparticles is directly related to their environmental behavior. The fate of C60 nanoparticles in water depends on their dispersive–aggregative status. This study illustrates that C60 can restore its molecular photochemical reactivity with TX100, which suggests surfactants, as common environmental pollutants, can change the environmental fate of nC60 in water environments and increase the environmental risk due to the change in the dispersive–aggregative status of nC60 aggregates. Thus accurate characterization of physicochemical properties of nC60 aggregates is necessary for evaluating their environmental behaviour and fate in the environment.

(Contributed by the editorial office of “Chinese Environmental Chemistry”)

Effect of gold nanoparticles on the efficiency and specificity of polymerase chain reaction2

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) modified with different chemical groups are widely used in many fields, particularly in biological analysis, detection and biomedical research. With AuNPs increasingly applied in biomedicine, the interactions between surface-modified AuNPs and biological macromolecules cannot be ignored, since they are potentially hazardous to human health. Studies on the effect of AuNPs on the efficiency and specificity of polymerase chain reactions (PCR) may establish a simple method to evaluate the potential toxic effects of various surface-modified AuNPs, according to the research published in a recent issue of Chinese Environmental Chemistry (2012, 31, 1–8).

“The size, concentration and the surface properties of AuNPs can affect the efficiency and specificity of PCR significantly”, explains Associate Prof. Yong Liang, an environmental toxicologist at the School of Medicine, Jianghan University, China. Recent studies showed that diverse surface-modified AuNPs have different toxic effects to various types of cells, which are mainly caused by their interactions with biological macromolecules. However, the inherent molecular mechanisms remain unclear. The researchers from Jianghan University prepared three types of AuNPs by the methods of sodium citrate (Na3Ct) reduction, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) surface coating, and mercaptopropionic acidhomocysteine (MPA–HCys) surface coating, and compared their effects on PCR. Furthermore, they applied competitive primers to compare the effect of the three AuNPs on PCR specificity, and to clarify the main factors that affected PCR specificity and yield.

It turned out that the three types of AuNPs significantly enhanced PCR efficiency in the order of Na3Ct–AuNPs (12 nm) > MPA–HCys–AuNPs (12 nm) > PVP–AuNPs (4 nm), and the enhancement was dependent on their concentration and size. Furthermore, by comparing the two nanoparticles of similar size (Na3Ct–AuNPs and MPA–HCys–AuNPs), Na3Ct–AuNPs improved the PCR efficiency more profoundly, indicating that the surface properties are also important factors in influencing the PCR efficiency. In addition, the three AuNPs effectively eliminated the inhibition of the competitive primer on PCR in a concentration-dependent manner. These results indicate that the three AuNPs can dramatically enhance the efficiency and specificity of PCR, and this effect is related to its concentration, size and surface properties.

(Contributed by the editorial office of “Chinese Environmental Chemistry”)

Visible light photocatalytic properties of iodine/cerium co-doped nano TiO2

Photocatalytic reactions have drawn intensive research interest due to their significance in a variety of processes such as solar energy conversion and environmental contaminant degradation. Titanium oxide (TiO2) is a semiconductor material frequently employed in photocatalytic reactions. However, due to its wide band gap, utilization of visible light by TiO2 is very limited. It has been recognized that doping of TiO2 with other elements can enhance its absorption of visible light. In a recent report from the research group of Prof. Yingping Huang, China Three Gorges University, an iodine/cerium (I/Ce) co-doped nano TiO2 photocatalyst was synthesized, and the effect of co-doping on the structure and visible light photocatalytic activity was studied.3
ugraphic, filename = c2em90052a-u2.gif

Un-doped, Ce-doped and I\Ce co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with two different doping ratios were synthesized by the sol–gel method, and characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and UV-visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy. The TEM images showed that all the particles were well dispersed and uniformly distributed with a size of 10 nm diameter. Based on XRD data, all the crystals were anatase after calcination at 450 °C. Ce and I atoms possibly entered the crystal lattice to form I–Ce–O and O–Ti–I bonds. UV-visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy revealed that the band gap of the co-doped TiO2 was 2.76 eV, which is significantly narrower than pure TiO2 (3.14 eV).

The degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) and salicylic acid (SA) were used as the model reactions to determine the optimal concentration of Ce and I. The results indicated that the optimal molar ratio was nCe[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]nI[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]nTi = 0.04[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.05[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, and the I0.05Ce0.04TiO2 catalyst had 2 and 3 times higher activity respectively than Ce–TiO2 and TiO2 under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). The photocatalytic process was proposed mainly as the hole oxidation mechanism along with the formation of ˙OH, O2˙ and H2O2. I\Ce co-doping efficiently decreased the recombination rate of the electron–hole pairs in the semiconductor.

(Contributed by the editorial office of “Chinese Environmental Chemistry”)

References

  1. M. Ni, B. Zhang, Y. He, J. Kim and J. B. Hughes, Chinese Environmental Chemistry, 2011, 30, 1533–1538 CAS.
  2. J. Yao, Y. Lin, J. Li, Q. Zhou and Y. Liang, Chinese Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31, 1–8 CAS.
  3. Y. Fang, T. Lan, Y. Zheng, J. Yang, A. Deng, A. Zhang and Y. Huang, Chinese Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31, 135–142 CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.