Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

N–H activation of hydrazines by a heterobimetallic Zr–Co complex: promotion of one-electron chemistry at Zr

J. W. Napoline, Mark W. Bezpalko, Bruce M. Foxman and Christine M. Thomas*
Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02454, USA. E-mail: thomasc@brandeis.edu; Fax: +1 781736-2516; Tel: +1 781736-2576

Received 1st August 2012, Accepted 28th September 2012

First published on 1st October 2012


Abstract

A tris(phosphino)amide-ligated Zr–Co heterobimetallic complex has been shown to activate N–H bonds of hydrazine derivatives via a proton-coupled electron transfer process. Such reactivity is highly unusual for an early metal such as Zr, but is promoted by the adjacent redox active Co atom.


The activation of N–H bonds is an important step in catalytic C–N bond-forming reactions.1,2 While late transition metals typically oxidatively add N–H bonds to form reactive amide species, early transition metals typically react with amines via protonolysis of M–E bonds (E = H, NR2, OR, alkyl). To fundamentally study N–H oxidative addition as a key reaction step, ammonia has been shown to oxidatively add to transition metal complexes.3–6 Similar studies with hydrazines remain less common,7 despite their applications in fuel cells8,9 and in organic synthesis,10,11 and the role of hydrazido complexes in the reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia.12,13

Our group has been investigating the combination of early and late transition metals in heterobimetallic complexes as a strategy to utilize the cooperative reactivity of the two transition metals to effect new synthetic transformations.14–16 With respect to N–H activation, Bergman and coworkers previously reported the oxidative addition of ArNH2 across a Zr–Ir bond to form a terminal Zr–NHAr anilide and a Zr–H–Ir bridging hydride.17 Previously, we reported a highly reduced coordinatively unsaturated heterobimetallic Zr–Co complex featuring a well-characterized metal–metal multiple bond, (THF)Zr(MesNPiPr2)3CoN2 (1).18 Complex 1 has been shown to undergo two electron oxidative processes in the presence of a number of small molecule substrates including alkyl halide substrates, carbon dioxide, and dihydrogen.19,20 Herein we report the reactivity of complex 1 towards hydrazine derivatives, uncovering the first examples of one-electron oxidative addition products with these Zr–Co heterobimetallic systems.

The diamagnetic compound 1 does not react with primary amines or anilines, but readily reacts with one equivalent of RNHNH2 (R = H (2), Me (3) or Ph (4)) to generate the yellow hydrazido complexes (RNNH2)Zr(MesNPiPr2)3CoN2 (2–4) in moderate yields (∼35%, Scheme 1). The 1H NMR spectra of compounds 2–4 exhibit 7–8 broad paramagnetically shifted resonances and their solution magnetic moments are indicative of S = 1/2 spin states (μeff = 1.8–2.0 μB). The presence of bound dinitrogen remaining on the Co atom is confirmed by the presence of ν(N2) vibrations in the IR spectra of 2–4 (ν(N2) = 2038–2044 cm−1) with an approximate 20 cm−1 increase in the ν(N2) stretching frequency compared to 1 (ν(N2) = 2026 cm−1).18 These changes indicate that the Zr/Co complex has been oxidized by one electron.


Reactivity of 1 with RNHNH2.
Scheme 1 Reactivity of 1 with RNHNH2.

X-Ray diffraction analyses of single crystals of compounds 2 and 4 reveal replacement of the zirconium-bound THF with an η2-hydrazide ligand (Fig. 1). The hydrazide ligands in 2 and 4 exhibit N–N distances of 1.412(2) and 1.4335(3) Å, respectively, indicating N–N single bond character, consistent with typical Zr side-on hydrazide complexes.21–27 The bond lengths between Zr and the anionic hydrazido nitrogen of 2 and 4 (2.040(1) and 2.137(2) Å) are shorter than the bonds between Zr and the datively bound hydrazido nitrogen atoms (2.332(1) and 2.265(2) Å), and all distances are in the range of previously reported zirconium η2-hydrazido complexes (2.04–2.12 Å and 2.30–2.47 Å, respectively).21–27 The geometry about the anionic nitrogen atom in both compounds 2 and 4 is planar which suggests π donation of the lone pair to the zirconium atom (vide infra). Notably, there are few structurally characterized examples of transition metal complexes of unsubstituted terminal η2-hydrazido(1−) N2H3 ligands,28–31 and complex 2 represents the first example with Zr.


Displacement ellipsoid (50%) representations of complexes 2, 4, and 5. For clarity, solvate molecules and hydrogen atoms except those associated with the hydrazido and anilide ligands are not shown. Only one of two independent molecules in the unit cell of 4 is shown. Hydrogen atoms bounds to the hydrazido unit were located on the difference Fourier map and refined. Relevant interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°): 2: Co–Zr: 2.7350(2); Co–N6: 1.830(1); Zr–N5: 2.040(1); Zr–N4: 2.332(1); N4–N5: 1.412(2). 4, one of two molecules: Co1–Zr1: 2.6981(4); Co1–N6: 1.852(2); Zr1–N5: 2.137(2); Zr1–N4: 2.265(2); N4–N5: 1.435(3). 5, Zr–Co: 2.8706(6); Co–N6: 1.962(3); Zr–N5: 2.117(3); Zr–N4: 2.263(3); N4–N5: 1.435(3); Co–N6–C46: 153.1(3).
Fig. 1 Displacement ellipsoid (50%) representations of complexes 2, 4, and 5. For clarity, solvate molecules and hydrogen atoms except those associated with the hydrazido and anilide ligands are not shown. Only one of two independent molecules in the unit cell of 4 is shown. Hydrogen atoms bounds to the hydrazido unit were located on the difference Fourier map and refined. Relevant interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°): 2: Co–Zr: 2.7350(2); Co–N6: 1.830(1); Zr–N5: 2.040(1); Zr–N4: 2.332(1); N4–N5: 1.412(2). 4, one of two molecules: Co1–Zr1: 2.6981(4); Co1–N6: 1.852(2); Zr1–N5: 2.137(2); Zr1–N4: 2.265(2); N4–N5: 1.435(3). 5, Zr–Co: 2.8706(6); Co–N6: 1.962(3); Zr–N5: 2.117(3); Zr–N4: 2.263(3); N4–N5: 1.435(3); Co–N6–C46: 153.1(3).

Although the metal oxidation states in complex 1 are rendered ambiguous by the metal–metal bonding, a plot of the Mulliken spin density of complex 2, derived from density functional theory, reveals that the single unpaired electron in this complex resides exclusively on the Co atom (see ESI). This suggests a ZrIV/Co0 assignment, consistent with what would be predicted using the conventional oxidation state formalism. Observed structural changes between parent complex 1 and complexes 2 and 4 can be attributed to oxidation of the complex as well as formation of a coordinatively saturated Zr(IV) center. Of these changes the most notable is the lengthening of the metal–metal interatomic distance from 2.36 Å18 in 1 to ∼2.7 Å in 2 and 4 as the donor/acceptor Co/Zr bonding weakens. There is also a noteworthy difference between the Zr–Co interatomic distances in 2 and 4, with an apparently stronger Zr–Co interaction in 2 compared to 4 (2.7350(2) vs. 2.6981(4) Å), likely attributed to the electron-withdrawing character of the phenyl group on the hydrazido ligand in 4. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis of complexes 1 and 2 reveal a Wiberg bond index (WBI) of 0.45 for the Zr–Co bond in 2 compared to the Zr–Co WBI of 1 (0.95) or ClZr(MesNPiPr2)3CoI (0.52, see ESI). The Zr–Co σ donor–acceptor interaction predicted using NBO analysis is shown in Fig. 2, along with the π donor–acceptor interaction between the anionic hydrazido nitrogen p orbital and Zr (WBIZr–N = 0.79 vs. WBIZr–N = 0.34 for neutral nitrogen donor).


Donor–acceptor interactions (NBO) in complex 2 between the filled Co dz2 orbital and the empty dz2 orbital on Zr (left, Edel = 41.3 kcal mol−1) and the filled hydrazido nitrogen p orbital and Zr (right, Edel = 9.1 kcal mol−1).
Fig. 2 Donor–acceptor interactions (NBO) in complex 2 between the filled Co dz2 orbital and the empty dz2 orbital on Zr (left, Edel = 41.3 kcal mol−1) and the filled hydrazido nitrogen p orbital and Zr (right, Edel = 9.1 kcal mol−1).

Consistent with the weakening of the Co–Zr interaction in complexes 2–4, cyclic voltammetry (CV) of these compounds reveals irreversible reductive events at negative potentials (ca. −2.2 V vs. ferrocene, see ESI). Previously, we showed that dative Co→Zr interactions have a dramatic effect on the CoI/0 and Co0/Co−I couples as electron density is withdrawn from Co.32 The Co0/−I couple of the dihalide complex ClZr(MesNPiPr2)3CoI (−1.87 V) is similar to the irreversible reduction observed for compounds 2–4 (also a Co0/−I reduction based on the calculated SOMO, see ESI), and the shift of this reductive feature to more negative potentials can be attributed to the decreased Co–Zr interaction as a result of a more electron rich hydrazido(1−) ligand on Zr in place of a halide. Notably, the Co–Zr distances in complexes 2 and 4 (2.7350(2) Å and 2.6981(4) Å) are longer than that of ClZr(MesNPiPr2)3CoI (2.6280(5) Å),32 despite their one-electron reduced nature.

Interest in the formation of complexes 2–4 prompted study into the mechanism of these reactions, particularly the outcome of the ejected hydrogen atom from the N–H activation step. 1H NMR analysis of the isolated volatiles from the reaction mixtures revealed formation of ammonia and the corresponding amine RNH2 as byproducts, presumably via hydrazine reduction by the proton and electron extruded upon formation of 2–4.

With this in mind, the reaction stoichiometry was adjusted and 1.5 equivalents of RNHNH2 (R = H, Me) were employed in the reaction with 1, leading to a dramatic increase in the isolable yields of compounds 2 and 3 (80–85%) via prevention of radical decompositions pathways. Interestingly, when 1 was treated with excess phenylhydrazine the reaction mixture became red/purple as a new two-electron oxidized product, (PhNNH2)Zr(MesNPiPr2)3CoNHPh (5), formed (Scheme 2). Compound 5, which has an S = 1 spin state (μeff = 2.78 μB), was easily identified due to the similarities of its paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR spectrum to that of the previously reported S = 1 complex ClZr(MesNPiPr2)3CoI.32 The formulation of complex 5 was confirmed by an X-ray structure determination (Fig. 1). The geometric parameters associated with the Zr–hydrazido fragment are nearly identical to those in the S = 1/2 species 4, but the Co–Zr distance is significantly longer (2.8706(6) Å), a result of less electron density at Co in this CoI species.


Treatment of 1 with excess PhNHNH2.
Scheme 2 Treatment of 1 with excess PhNHNH2.

The mechanism by which hydrazines are cleaved to NH3 and RNH2, and the isolation of complex 5 is intriguing, particularly since similar compounds were not generated upon treatment of 1 with excess MeNHNH2 or N2H4 (even in the presence of PhNH2), nor does complex 4 react with PhNH2 to generate 5. In several W(VI) examples, Schrock et al. proposed a mechanism by which tungsten hydrazine adducts undergo rapid deprotonation by free hydrazine to afford η2-hydrazide complexes.28,30 A similar deprotonation mechanism is likely for the Co(II) example,29 and the hydrazido(1−) ligand in the Fe example is attained via extrusion of CH4 from an FeII–Me precursor.31 Adaptations of these mechanisms by replacing simple deprotonation with proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) explain the presently reported chemistry (Scheme 3).33 It is proposed that the proton and electron required for this process are provided by a short-lived hydrazine–zirconium adduct which extrudes a hydrogen atom to lead to a neutral metal complex, a molecule of ammonia, and an aminyl radical. The highly reactive aminyl radical would likely be quenched by abstracting H˙ from solvent or by undergoing a similar process with a second hydrazine–zirconium adduct. As phenylaminyl radicals are more stable, it is proposed that this intermediate is long-lived enough to combine with the Co0 radical site in 4 to form the stable Co–NHPh compound 5. Attempts to trap the free H˙ generated upon hydrazine activation were unsuccessful, implying that H-atom transfer is rapid and perhaps occurs via an inner-sphere process. Further, the reactions of 1 with hydrazine are fast at room temperature, precluding the observation of intermediates or studies of reaction rate, so other mechanisms cannot be ruled out at this time.


Plausible mechanism for the formation of 2–4.
Scheme 3 Plausible mechanism for the formation of 2–4.

In summary, it has been found that the reduced, coordinatively unsaturated heterobimetallic complex 1 is capable of undergoing a one-electron oxidative addition process in which hydrazine N–H bonds are cleaved to afford a series of zirconium η2-hydrazido(1−) complexes 2–5. This sort of N–H activation at an early metal fragment is unusual, as is one-electron transfer chemistry from Zr. Thus, the metal–metal bonding in complex 1 promotes σ-bond activation at Zr remotely, without effecting the immediate coordination sphere of Co or the C3-symmetric core of the bimetallic. During the hydrazine activation process, ammonia and RNH2 are formed as byproducts of hydrogen atom transfer. The mechanism of this PCET warrants further investigation, and additional one-electron σ-bond activation processes using complex 1 are under investigation.

Notes and references

  1. J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2046–2067 CrossRef CAS.
  2. T. E. Müller and M. Beller, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 675–704 CrossRef.
  3. C. M. Fafard, D. Adhikari, B. M. Foxman, D. J. Mindiola and O. V. Ozerov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 10318–10319 CrossRef CAS.
  4. J. Zhao, A. S. Goldman and J. F. Hartwig, Science, 2005, 307, 1080–1082 CrossRef CAS.
  5. E. Morgan, D. F. MacLean, R. McDonald and L. Turculet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 14234–14236 CrossRef CAS.
  6. E. Khaskin, M. A. Iron, L. J. W. Shimon, J. Zhang and D. Milstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 8542–8543 CrossRef CAS.
  7. Z. Huang, J. Zhou and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11458–11460 CrossRef CAS.
  8. A. Serov and C. Kwak, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 98, 1–9 CrossRef CAS.
  9. N. V. Rees and R. G. Compton, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 1255–1260 CAS.
  10. S. Banerjee, E. Barnea and A. L. Odom, Organometallics, 2008, 27, 1005–1014 CrossRef CAS.
  11. K. Weitershaus, H. Wadepohl and L. H. Gade, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 3381–3389 CrossRef CAS.
  12. J. Chatt, J. R. Dilworth and R. L. Richards, Chem. Rev., 1978, 78, 589–625 CrossRef CAS.
  13. B. M. Barney, T.-C. Yang, R. Y. Igarashi, P. C. Dos Santos, M. Laryukhin, H.-I. Lee, B. M. Hoffman, D. R. Dean and L. C. Seefeldt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 14960–14961 CrossRef CAS.
  14. B. G. Cooper, J. W. Napoline and C. M. Thomas, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2012, 54, 1–40 CAS.
  15. N. Wheatley and P. Kalck, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 3379–3420 CrossRef CAS.
  16. D. W. Stephan, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1989, 95, 41–107 CrossRef CAS.
  17. A. M. Baranger, F. J. Hollander and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 7890–7891 CrossRef CAS.
  18. B. P. Greenwood, G. T. Rowe, C.-H. Chen, B. M. Foxman and C. M. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 44–45 CrossRef CAS.
  19. C. M. Thomas, J. W. Napoline, G. T. Rowe and B. M. Foxman, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 5790–5792 RSC.
  20. J. P. Krogman, B. M. Foxman and C. M. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14582–14585 CrossRef CAS.
  21. A. Willner, B. Neumann, H.-G. Stammler and N. W. Mitzel, Dalton Trans., 2009, 6280–6282 RSC.
  22. H. Herrmann, H. Wadepohl and L. H. Gade, Dalton Trans., 2008, 2111–2119 RSC.
  23. A. Baunemann, Y. Kim, M. Winter and R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans., 2006, 121–128 RSC.
  24. J.-S. M. Lehn and D. M. Hoffman, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2003, 345, 327–332 CrossRef CAS.
  25. C. H. Zambrano, P. E. Fanwick and I. P. Rothwell, Organometallics, 1994, 13, 1174–1177 CrossRef CAS.
  26. J.-S. M. Lehn, S. Javed and D. M. Hoffman, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 993–1000 CrossRef CAS.
  27. P. J. Walsh, F. J. Hollander and R. G. Bergman, J. Organomet. Chem., 1992, 428, 13–47 CrossRef CAS.
  28. R. R. Schrock, A. H. Liu, M. B. O'Regan, W. C. Finch and J. F. Payack, Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 3574–3583 CrossRef CAS.
  29. S. Vogel, A. Barth, G. Huttner, T. Klein, L. Zsolnai and R. Kremer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 303–304 CrossRef.
  30. S. Cai and R. R. Schrock, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 4105–4106 CrossRef CAS.
  31. C. T. Saouma, R. A. Kinney, B. M. Hoffman and J. C. Peters, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3446–3449 CrossRef CAS.
  32. B. P. Greenwood, S. I. Forman, G. T. Rowe, C.-H. Chen, B. M. Foxman and C. M. Thomas, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 6251–6260 CrossRef CAS.
  33. J. J. Warren, T. A. Tronic and J. M. Mayer, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6961–7001 CrossRef CAS.

Footnotes

This article is part of the ChemComm ‘Emerging Investigators 2013’ themed issue.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, spectroscopic and cyclic voltammetry data, computational details. CCDC 892502–892504. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c2cc35594a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.