James C. A.
Flanagan
,
Laura M.
Dornan
,
Mark G.
McLaughlin
,
Niall G.
McCreanor
,
Matthew J.
Cook
* and
Mark J.
Muldoon
*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland. E-mail: m.cook@qub.ac.uk; Tel: +44 (0) 28 9097 4682m.j.muldoon@qub.ac.uk; Tel: +44 (0) 28 9097 4420
First published on 28th February 2012
N-Heterocycles can be prepared using alcohol oxidation as a key synthetic step. Herein we report studies exploring the potential of Cu/TEMPO as an aerobic oxidation catalyst for the synthesis of substituted indoles and quinolines.
An attractive route for the synthesis of N-heterocycles is to utilize alcohols as substrates as they are readily available and easy to handle. There are numerous examples where catalytic transfer hydrogenations or “hydrogen borrowing” methods have been used to prepare N-heterocycles from alcohols.4 A particularly desirable route for the selective synthesis of substituted N-heterocycles is the intramolecular oxidative cyclization of amino alcohols. Watanabe and co-workers previously employed this route for the synthesis of indoles, using a RuCl2(PPh3)3 catalyst.5 More recently, heterogeneous ruthenium catalysts (Ru/CeO2 and Ru/ZrO2) were used to prepare indole using the same route.6 Fujita et al. reported the use of a [Cp*IrCl2]2 catalyst for the synthesis of indoles, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines and 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-benzazepine.7 For the same starting materials, it was found that when the catalyst was switched to [Cp*RhCl2]2 it produced the corresponding five-, six-, and seven-membered ring lactams.8
This approach would be greatly improved if we could move away from expensive precious metals and employ more earth abundant metals. Given that oxidation of an alcohol to an aldehyde is the key step in this route, the Cu/TEMPO/O2 system is an attractive alternative.9 This biomimetic system employs a Cu(II) or Cu(I)9e salt complexed by a ligand such as 2,2-bipyridine, the stable free radical TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl), a base and dioxygen as the terminal oxidant. Along with the fact that it employs copper, this system was appealing because it is known to operate under mild conditions and is selective for the oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes.9 This feature would increase the scope of this oxidative intramolecular oxidative cyclization and allow us to prepare N-heterocycles using substrates containing secondary alcohol functionality. Furthermore, because it is an aerobic approach we envisaged that this would allow us to obtain quinolines as opposed to tetrahydroquinolines7 and lactams8 which were obtained using the Ir and Rh catalysts mentioned earlier. While there have been numerous studies exploring Cu/TEMPO for catalytic alcohol oxidation, these studies have primarily focused on simple model substrates;9 the catalyst had not been exploited for the synthesis of N-heterocycles.10
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | Cu source (mol%) | Co-catalyst (mol%) | Temperature (time, h) | Yield (%) |
a Ligand = 2′2-bipyridine, base = 3 mol% NMI and 3 mol% DBU, solvent = acetonitrile, 3 Å molecular sieves present. b Aqueous biphasic system with decalin as the organic solvent, ligand = 2′2-bipyridine, base = 3 mol% NMI and 3 mol% DBU. c Ligand = 1,10-phenanthroline, base = 2 equivalent K2CO3, solvent = toluene. | ||||
1a | Cu(OTf)2 (3) | TEMPO (3) | 60 °C (4) | 46 |
2a | Cu(OTf)2 (3) | TEMPO (3) | 60 °C (24) | 30 |
3a | Cu(OTf)2 (9) | TEMPO (9) | 60 °C (4) | 90 |
4b | Cu(OTf)2 (3) | HO-TEMPO (3) | 90 °C (18) | 39 |
5c | CuCl (5) | DBAD (5) | 90 °C (4) | 33 |
The catalyst system which we mainly used was previously optimised for alcohol oxidation by Kumpulainen and Koskinen9d and consisted of Cu(OTf)2/2,2′-bipyridine/TEMPO, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), N-methylimidazole (NMI), 3 Å molecular sieves and acetonitrile. In our studies, it was found that longer reaction times led to lower yields (cf. entries 1 and 2 in Table 1), suggesting that the product is undergoing decomposition. This was further confirmed by subjecting pure indole to our reaction conditions, resulting in the recovery of 82% of indole (isolated yield). Additionally, we followed this product inhibition by 1H NMR using methyl benzoate as an internal standard and we clearly observed the disappearance of indole over time. So far we have been unable to identify the by-products from the reaction between the catalyst and indole, but one possible explanation is that indole is reacting with the Cu(II) via the nucleophilic C3-position. Work by Gaunt and co-workers has demonstrated that Cu(OTf)2 can be used to catalyse the arylation of indoles at this position.11 Further evidence that the product is reacting with the catalyst in this manner was obtained when we subjected 3-methylindole to standard reaction conditions. In this case, we could only recover and isolate 26% of the original 3-methylindole, with many unidentified by-products produced. We believe this greater reactivity can be rationalised by the fact that 3-methylindole is more nucleophilic at the 3-position than indole.
The fact that we can obtain a 90% isolated yield for the synthesis of indole (entry 3 in Table 1) indicates that the catalyst will preferentially oxidize the substrate over this unwanted reaction with the product. As shown in Fig. 1, when we monitored the reaction by 1H NMR of 1a, we observed smooth kinetics over the course of the reaction (until we obtained a yield of ∼80%).
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Kinetic study for the oxidation of 1a, monitored by 1H NMR using PhCO2Me as an internal standard in CD3CN. |
The results indicate that if we had a method of removing the product this could lead to greater efficiency and catalyst stability. We attempted to address the product inhibition problem by exploring the use of aqueous biphasic systems. In these cases, we employed either 4-hydroxy-TEMPO or 4-carboxy-TEMPO to ensure that both the copper complex and TEMPO were retained in the aqueous phase.† It was hoped that if the product was extracted into the upper organic phase (we explored the use of toluene, xylene, decalin and nonane) it would reduce product decomposition. Unfortunately, it was found that the reactions were very slow and the highest yield obtained was 39% (entry 3 in Table 1). As part of our optimisation studies we also investigated the use of copper(I)/di-tert-butyl-azodicarboxylate (DBAD) or its corresponding hydrazine (DBADH2) for the synthesis of indole. This catalyst system was reported by Markó as an effective method for alcohol oxidation,12 however we found that it was not as effective as Cu/TEMPO and a maximum yield of 33% was obtained for these catalysts (entry 4 in Table 1).
Taking our optimised conditions that allowed us to obtain 90% isolated yield of indole, we then applied these conditions for the synthesis of some substituted indoles. As can be seen in Table 2, these could be obtained in moderate to good (isolated) yields.
![]() |
The oxidation of 3 to 4 is an impressive illustration of the ability of the Cu/TEMPO system to selectively oxidize the primary alcohol to an aldehyde whilst leaving the secondary alcohol unaffected (eqn (1)). The carbonyl group formed is attacked by the N atom of the amino group to afford the indole in 58% isolated yield with a secondary alcohol still intact.
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Further details of experiments and synthesis of starting materials. See DOI: 10.1039/c2gc35062a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 |