Interfaces of ionic liquids

Frank Endres
Institute of Particle Technology, Clausthal University of Technology, Arnold-Sommerfeld-Straße 6, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany. E-mail: frank.endres@tu-clausthal.de

Received 21st February 2012 , Accepted 21st February 2012

                  Frank Endres

Frank Endres

Frank Endres studied Chemistry at the University of Saarbrucken, Germany, where he received a PhD in Physical Chemistry in 1996. He then moved to the University of Karlsruhe where he obtained his habilitation in Physical Chemistry in 2002. In the same year he moved to the Clausthal University of Technology (www.tu-clausthal.de) where he was appointed professor in 2003. In 2011 he got an offer from the university of Leipzig, Germany, for a chair of physical chemistry (declined). Today he is a full professor of interface processes and electrochemistry at Clausthal University of Technology and permanent guest professor at the Harbin Institute of Technology, China (http://en.hit.edu.cn). His main interests cover ionic liquids, interface processes, electrochemistry and materials science.


During the recent 15 years ionic liquids have experienced an unprecedented worldwide rising interest which is manifested in a still increasing number of publications every year. In 1997 there were less than 50 papers published in the field, and ionic liquids were definitely exotic at that time, but just 5 years later in 2002 already more than 500 papers were published. In 2011 more than 4000 papers dealt with this class of liquids and there is a still growing worldwide community doing experiments and theory with these liquids. It is remarkable that China has developed rapidly in this field, and in 2011 more than 1200 papers were published by Chinese groups alone.

During the recent maybe 4 years it has been found that ionic liquids show an interesting interfacial chemistry, and these in part unusual observations were the motivation for this Themed Issue. Rob Atkin from Newcastle University, Australia, was among the first who could show with Atomic Force Microscopy that ionic liquids form several remarkably strongly adhering solvation layers on solid surfaces.1 His results were confirmed by Mezger et al.2 and from then on a rising interest in the interfacial chemistry of ionic liquids could be observed. Seddon et al. found that ionic liquids can in principle be distilled3 and Heintz et al. were the first ones who studied distilled ionic liquids by means of IR spectroscopy.4 In parallel, Souda5 and Steinrück et al.6 showed that ultrathin layers of ionic liquids can be made by evaporation under the conditions of an ultrahigh vacuum and the Perspective from Steinrück (DOI: 10.1039/c2cp24087d) in this Themed Issue summarizes well the key results obtained by angle resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. UHV evaporation is quite a promising way to make impurity free ionic liquids and Behm et al. showed molecularly resolved STM images of an ionic liquid monolayer by temperature dependent UHV-STM.7 Kornyshev et al.,8 Fedorov9 and Bazant et al.10 showed in a series of theory papers that the interface between an electrode and an ionic liquid can be simulated. Instead of a simple double layer as is known for aqueous electrolytes, rather multilayers are observed and in a very fundamental experimental paper it was shown with a combination of in situ STM, in situ AFM and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy that the interface of Au(111) with an ionic liquid with all impurities below 10 ppm is indeed built up of potential dependent solvation layers.11 In a limited potential regime even the herringbone superstructure of Au(111) can be probed and there is a preferential adsorption of cations in the cathodic regime and of anions in the anodic regime. The electrochemical behavior is, nevertheless, remarkably complicated and the Discussion of Roling et al. in this Themed Issue (DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40288b) shows that care is needed in the interpretation of capacitance measurements. There can be more than one capacitive process, and temperature dependent measurements of the capacitance should be evaluated and interpreted with the highest care as artefacts are observed with single frequency measurements. A high purity of the liquids is a prerequisite for the interpretation of data obtained at interfaces and a recent paper from Coutinho et al. showed that the still popular liquids with BF4 and PF6 anions are quite problematic as they easily hydrolyze in the presence of water.12 This hydrolysis is maybe the reason why contradictory results on the electrochemical double layer were obtained by different groups with this type of liquids. The papers published in the present Themed Issue show without doubt that the interfacial behavior of ionic liquids is complicated but also fascinating at the same time. Both experiments and theory have made remarkable progress in recent years and it can be expected that in 5 years from now it will be better understood why even slight modifications in the ion structure can have a considerable effect on the interfacial behavior of ionic liquids.

References

  1. R. Atkin and G. G. Warr, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 5162 CAS .
  2. M. Mezger, H. Schröder, H. Reichert, S. Schramm, J. S. Okasinski, S. Schöder, V. Honkimäki, M. Deutsch, B. M. Ocko, J. Ralston, M. Rohwerder, M. Stratmann and H. Dosch, Science, 2008, 322, 424 CrossRef CAS .
  3. M. J. Earle, J. M. S. S. Esperanca, M. A. Gilea, J. N. C. Lopes, L. P. N. Rebelo, J. W. Magee, K. R. Seddon and J. A. Widegren, Nature, 2006, 439, 831 CrossRef CAS .
  4. D. H. Zaitsau, G. J. Kabo, A. A. Strechan, Y. U. Paulechka, A. Tschersich, S. P. Verevkin and A. Heintz, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 7303 CrossRef CAS .
  5. R. Souda, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 15349 CrossRef CAS .
  6. T. Cremer, M. Killian, J. M. Gottfried, N. Paape, P. Wasserscheid, F. Maier and H.-P. Steinrueck, ChemPhysChem, 2008, 9, 2185 CrossRef CAS .
  7. T. Waldmann, H. H. Huang, H. E. Hoster, O. Höfft, F. Endres and R. J. Behm, ChemPhysChem, 2011, 12, 2565 CrossRef CAS .
  8. M. V. Fedorov and A. A. Kornyshev, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 11868 CrossRef CAS .
  9. M. V. Fedorov and A. A. Kornyshev, Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53, 6835 CrossRef CAS .
  10. M. Z. Bazant, B. D. Storey and A. A. Kornyshev, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106, 046102 CrossRef .
  11. R. Atkin, N. Borisenko, M. Drüschler, S. Z. El Abedin, F. Endres, R. Hayes, B. Huber and B. Roling, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 6849 RSC .
  12. M. G. Freire, C. M. S. S. Neves, I. M. Marrucho, J. A. P. Coutinho and A. M. Fernandes, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010, 114, 3744 CrossRef CAS .

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2012
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.