Luca
Bucchini
a,
Alejandro
Rodarte
a and
Patrizia
Restani
*b
aHylobates Consulting srl, Via Tarsia 61, Rome, Italy. E-mail: lucabucchini@hylobates.it; alejandrorodarte@hylobates.it; Fax: +39 0698 30 9396 28; Tel: +39 0698 9396 30
bDept. Pharmacological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133, Milano, Italy. E-mail: patrizia.restani@unimi.it; Fax: +39 0250 31 8284; Tel: +39 0250 31 8371/350
First published on 21st November 2011
The main aim of the EC-financed R&D project PlantLIBRA (PLANT food supplements: Levels of Intake, Benefit and Risk Assessment) is to foster the safe use of food supplements containing plants or botanical preparations, by enabling science-based decision making by regulators and stakeholders. To make informed decisions, competent authorities and industry need more accessible and quality-assured information, as well as better tools (e.g., databases) and procedures for safety and benefit assessments, supported by broadly accepted methodologies. Consequently, PlantLIBRA is working to develop, validate and disseminate data and methodologies for risk and benefit assessment of plant food supplements, and to implement sustainable international cooperation. International cooperation will help ensure the quality of botanicals imported in the EU. Moreover, the project will provide data on intake by conducting a harmonized consumption survey. Existing composition and safety data will be collated into a meta-database. New analytical data and methods will be investigated and validated. The consortium is working closely with competent authorities and stakeholders.
Plant Food Supplements (PFS) have shown a high acceptance by consumers1 due to potential/advertised advantages like efficacy, safety, and relatively low costs.2 They have also been used for their health-promoting effects for a long time. PFS contain plants or herbal extracts and are defined in the EC Directive 2002/46 on general provisions for food supplements,3 as foodstuffs whose purpose is to supplement the normal diet and which are concentrated sources of nutrients or other substances with a nutritional or physiological effect, alone or combined, marketed in dose form, such as capsules, pastilles, tablets, pills and other similar forms, sachets of powder, ampoules of liquids, drop dispensing bottles, and other similar forms of liquids and powders designed to be dispensed in measured small unit quantities.
The recent discussions within Europe and elsewhere have identified several knowledge gaps in the way these products are tested and evaluated in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, a shared approach to evaluate the benefits and safety of PFS across the EU would be helpful for the scientific assessments and contribute to international harmonization.
In terms of safety, EFSA, the European Food Safety Authority, has initiated work in this area and has elaborated a guidance for the safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations.4 In their assessment, EFSA has also identified bottlenecks that ought to be addressed. More generally, with the overall purpose of harmonising and monitoring global food quality and safety, several European Commission-funded research projects5 have established methodologies and developed tools, predominantly for foods, that could, but have not been yet applied to PFS. These projects include:
• EuroFir (European Food Information Resource),
• MoniQa (Monitoring and Quality Assurance in the Food Supply Chain),
• Beneris (Benefit-Risk Assessment for Food),
• Qalibra (Quality of Life – Integrated Benefit and Risk Analysis), and
• Eurreca (European micronutrient Recommendations Aligned).
In order to better protect consumers, a new integrated approach was needed for plant food supplements. In this context and to address this situation, the PlantLIBRA (acronym of PLANT food supplements: Levels of Intake, Benefit and Risk Assessment) project was created in response to the 7th EU Framework Programme call for proposals titled: Risk-benefit assessment of food supplements. This topic was within the European Commission's funding scheme Collaborative Project (large scale integrating project) for Specific International Cooperation Actions (SICA). After being positively evaluated, the project started in June 2010 and will end in May 2014.
In this context, PlantLIBRA will contribute by:
(1) Expanding and generating knowledge through systematic reviews, from published or previously inaccessible datasets, and through new studies on benefits, risks and new analytical findings. This will be complemented with research on plants used for food supplements, on their phytochemical composition, and the analytical methods for beneficial or toxic components.
Subsequently, this body of knowledge will be transferred to an accessible meta-database. The database will be easily searchable with retrievable data on chemical composition, botanical information, bioactivity and toxicity data. It will be developed to serve a variety of needs of the PlantLIBRA project, of other end users and of stakeholders.
(2) Providing regulators across the EU with an enhanced decision-making framework to evaluate and assess benefits and risks, integrating and advancing existing tools (e.g., EFSA and other international guidelines). This will enable and help increase science-based decision making by regulatory authorities and players of the PFS supply chain in the EU and in exporting countries.
(3) Contributing to a better understanding of consumer behaviour through the first pan-European PFS intake survey. The results of the survey, further studies on consumer behaviour and the direct interaction with regulatory authorities, can provide useful information to stakeholders and regulators to enhance the safe use of food supplements by consumers.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Schematization of the work scope of the PlantLIBRA project for the assessment of plant food supplement (PFS) safety. |
To obtain reliable results and considering the significant differences within the European market of PFS, the questionnaires have been carefully formulated to reflect the variability of the products and distinguish between PFS and herbal medicines. For this purpose, interviewers have been trained regarding concepts, definitions, and product differences. The data collected from the survey is verified accordingly as well.
(1) identification of plant material;
(2) analysis of bioactive constituents with positive or negative health effects;
(3) detection of environmental contaminants or residues from agricultural practice;
(4) biological markers useful to evaluate exposure, physiological activity, adverse effects and/or misidentification of plants.
Information gaps will also be identified and the generated outputs will expand the body of knowledge in the meta-database.
Priority methods for the determination of bioactive compounds, contaminants, pesticide residues and biomarkers occurring in PFS have been identified, and will be evaluated and validated. To this end, priority lists of compound classes and plants according to relevance, toxicity, benefits, risks and other criteria have been drafted.
This approach includes the development and testing of methods for the detection of compounds useful for identification and to test for physiological/toxicological activity. Additionally, an international network of laboratories will be organized with proven expertise in analytical assays for PFS and botanicals. The laboratories selected for the network will have to fulfil specific quality criteria and excel in technical and analytical competence, and possess state-of-the-art methodologies. The network aims to promote further investigation in the sector and provide authorities, and other stakeholders, with reference laboratories for quality and safety issues concerning PFS.
(1) collection of well-documented adverse effects in humans to plants consumed as food or as ingredients of food supplements, with information and characterization of botanicals, their role in adverse effects or their misidentification (supported by data from European Poison Centres);
(2) identification and/or confirmation of biological markers of adverse effects;
(3) assessment of source of misidentification of plants used as food or food supplements, and containing poisonous compounds;
(4) collection of data on known interactions between plant ingredients and nutrients, or plant ingredients and conventional drugs;
(5) collaboration with the existing international alert network (via the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists – EAPCCT) to improve the dissemination of data on adverse effects and poisoning due to botanicals.
The meta-database (ePlantLIBRA) is based on existing databases: eBASIS (Bioactive Substances in Food Information System), developed by EuroFIR, and the MoniQA methods database.
The primary goal of this activity is to develop, test and apply a sustainable integrated meta-database of biologically active compounds found in plants used for manufacturing PFS. The meta-database (ePlantLIBRA) is based on existing databases: eBASIS (Bioactive Substances in Food Information System), developed by EuroFIR, and the MoniQA methods database.
The ePlantLIBRA database will provide the methodology and data, or pertinent links to other databases, to allow decision makers evaluating risks and benefits to retrieve comprehensive science-based information on plants and food supplements.
Short and simple human intervention studies with a single quantified dose of selected PFS will be carried out to determine further biomarkers of exposure in urine. Urine is, in most cases, the best source of biomarkers of exposure and is much less invasive than blood sampling.
A series of “best practice” recommendations for future human intervention studies on PFS will be developed, based on a systematic review of existing human intervention studies using PFS. Regarding the potential beneficial effects of PFS, it is critical to enable an early evaluation of their efficacy. This is measured by in vitro assays as an indication of activity in vivo. A panel of assays will be investigated to identify the most efficient for screening activities of different PFS.
A methodology for the risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations will be defined, based on existing models for foods, adapted to the requirements of PFS. The methodology to be developed and validated will focus on issues that, according to the present state of the art and recent guidelines and opinions from regulatory bodies, are the major bottlenecks in the risk assessment of PFS. For example, a quantitative approach, the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), has been evaluated for its potential for the risk assessment of PFS. Additionally, botanical ingredients have been selected, based on their genotoxic and/or carcinogenic potential, and assessed using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach.
The methodology will be tested using plant case studies and will address the major priorities that pertain to PFS, including consumption and exposure.
The main objectives are:
(1) to review science-based models to assess risks and benefits of foods and herbal medicines and their applicability for PFS containing plants and/or botanical preparations;
(2) to provide a flexible tool to screen risks, benefits and determine risk-benefit situations occurring in PFS;
(3) to identify used common currencies that are adjustable to the risks and benefits particular to PFS (like quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)).
The development, application and validation of the proposed approach will be evaluated through plant risk-benefit assessment case studies. Case studies will rely on the ePlantLIBRA database for data.
For this, it is necessary to map the consumer PFS information environment, to compare and contrast various perceptions, and to identify and model consumer responses to available information relating to PFS risk/benefits. It is assumed that consumers do not constitute a homogeneous category and several groups of consumers can be identified, including consumers and non-consumers of PFS.
To understand stakeholder and consumer perceptions of PFS, a mental models approach is proposed for this research:
(1) To obtain expert stakeholder beliefs towards PFS, factors influencing these beliefs, and how these relate to other aspects of diet and health. This will allow for mapping of areas of both agreement and disagreement between experts;
(2) To draw out lay consumer mental models to assess the nature and ways in which people think about different PFS;
(3) To assess the similarities and differences in the conceptualisations of PFS between expert stakeholders and lay consumers.
Therefore the involvement of stakeholders, such as policy makers, industry and trade associations, and working with them in the form of advisory boards, provides the opportunity to address problems, and receive inputs on scientific bottlenecks and limitations in the sector. In September 2011, policy regulators from 19 European countries, China and the USA debated with PlantLIBRA researchers on outcomes and strategies to tackle priorities in the science of plant food supplements.
The global impact of PlantLIBRA is accomplished through direct participation of four Extra-European institutions (Argentina, Brazil, China, and South Africa) in the project, by sharing their knowledge and expertise, through dissemination events and with mutual exchange.
The PlantLIBRA consortium is working to address data, methodology and consensus gaps in cooperation with different stakeholders and decision makers in the PFS sector.
Footnotes |
† This paper forms part of the themed issue on Plant Food Supplements: regulatory, scientific and technical issues concerning safety, quality and efficacy. |
‡ The content of this summary is based on the PlantLIBRA project's statement of work and the tasks achieved till the point of writing of this summary. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 |