Co(dmgH)2pyCl as a noble-metal-free co-catalyst for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over hexagonal ZnIn2S4

Yanhong Gaoa, Huaxiang Lina, Shiying Zhangb and Zhaohui Li*a
aState Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, P. R. China. E-mail: zhaohuili1969@yahoo.com
bHunan Key Laboratory of Applied Environmental Photocatalysis, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan, P. R. China

Received 18th November 2015 , Accepted 5th January 2016

First published on 8th January 2016


Abstract

Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites (dmgH = dimethylglyoxime and py = pyridine) with different amounts of Co(dmgH)2pyCl loaded were prepared from hexagonal ZnIn2S4 and Co(dmgH)2pyCl via an impregnation method. The photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution over the as-prepared Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites under visible light irradiation was investigated. It was found that the hydrogen evolution over hexagonal ZnIn2S4 can be significantly increased by loading Co(dmgH)2pyCl as a co-catalyst. An optimum activity was achieved over 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite, with 1438.5 μmol hydrogen generated and a turnover number of 387 (based on Co(dmgH)2pyCl) reached in 8 h visible light irradiation. This value is much higher than that obtained over Pt loaded ZnIn2S4 under similar conditions, indicating that Co(dmgH)2pyCl can be a highly efficient noble-metal-free co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over hexagonal ZnIn2S4. The mechanism for the hydrogen evolution over the Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite was also proposed. This work paves a way to the development of highly efficient noble-metal-free photocatalytic systems for hydrogen evolution.


Introduction

The ever increasing global demand for energy and the environmental consequences of burning fossil fuels has stimulated considerable effort to exploit renewable carbon-free energy alternatives. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation is considered to be an attractive and promising strategy in solving the increasing serious energy and environmental problems.1 Ever since the pioneering work of a photoelectron chemical cell using Pt–TiO2 electrodes for hydrogen evolution reported by Fujishima and Honda in the early 1970s, a variety of inorganic semiconductors including metal oxides, sulfides and oxynitrides as well as metal-free organic semiconductors have been explored for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.2 Among the already reported semiconductor photocatalysts, ZnIn2S4, a ternary metal chalcogenide, has attracted much recent attention due to its suitable band gap (2.34–2.48 eV) well responding to the visible light absorption. Previous studies have revealed that ZnIn2S4 exhibits two distinct polymorphs based on cubic and hexagonal lattices, and both of them are active for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiations.3 However, the photocatalytic performance for hydrogen evolution over pure ZnIn2S4 is low due to the short lifetime of the photo-generated electron–hole pairs.

For semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, co-catalysts like noble metals Pt, Au, Rh, and their oxides RuO2, RhxCr2−xO3 are generally required.4 These noble metal co-catalysts can suppress the recombination of the photo-generated charge carriers, lower the over potential for hydrogen evolution and provide redox reaction sites for hydrogen evolution to avoid the back reactions. However, due to the high price and the scarcity of the noble metal co-catalysts, extensive recent studies have been devoted to the development of noble-metal-free co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Transition metal sulfides like MoS2, WS2 and NiS, which are well-known electro-catalysts for hydrogen evolution, have been demonstrated to be excellent co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.5

In addition to transition metal sulfides, cobaloximes, bis(dialkyl or diarylglyoximate) complexes composed of earth-abundant element cobalt, have also been reported for hydrogen evolution based on electro-catalytic studies as well as photochemical investigations.6 In particular, [Co(dmgH)2pyCl] (dmgH = dimethylglyoxime and py = pyridine) has already been used as an effective co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over a series of semiconductors like polyoxoniobate, CdS, TiO2, CdSe/ZnS QDs and g-C3N4.7 In this manuscript, we reported the successful deposition of Co(dmgH)2pyCl on hexagonal ZnIn2S4 via an impregnation method for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiations. It was found that Co(dmgH)2pyCl can be an effective co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over ZnIn2S4 and the photocatalytic activity of Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite can be even higher than that of Pt/ZnIn2S4 under similar reaction conditions. The mechanism for the hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite was also proposed.

Experimental section

Preparation

All the reagents are analytical grade and used without further purifications. Hexagonal ZnIn2S4 powder was synthesized according to our previously reported method.3d Co(dmgH)2pyCl was prepared according to the literature8 and its structure was confirmed by IR (Fig. S1), 1H NMR and ESI-MS (Table S1). For the preparation of Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites, different amounts of Co(dmgH)2pyCl were dissolved in a minimum amount of methanol. ZnIn2S4 (100 mg) were added to the above solution and the resultant suspension was incubated at room temperature for 12 h. The resultant product was dried at 60 °C under vacuum to obtain the final product. For comparison, 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 was also prepared following the procedure reported previously.4b

Characterizations

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα irradiations. The IR analyses were carried out on a Nicolet 670 FT-IR spectrometer. UV-visible diffraction spectra (UV-vis DRS) of the powders were obtained for the dry pressed disk samples using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Cary 500 Scan Spectrophotometers, Varian). BaSO4 was used as a reflectance standard. The diffuse reflectance spectra have been converted into its equivalent absorption spectra using the Kubelka-Munk function, F(R) = K/S = (1R)2/2R, where K is the absorption coefficient, R is the diffused reflectance, and S is the scattering coefficient. 1H NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6 on a Bruker AVANCE III 400 NMR apparatus. Mass spectra (MS) were obtained on a LCQ Fleet (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with an electro-spray ionization (ESI) interface. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a PHI Quantum 2000 XPS system (PHI, USA) with a monochromatic Al Kα source and a charge neutralizer. All of the binding energies were referred to the C 1s peak at 284.6 eV of the surface adventitious carbon. The morphology of the samples was characterized by a field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-6700F). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained in a JEOL model JEM 2010 EX instrument at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The powder particles were supported on a carbon film coated on a 3 mm diameter fine-mesh copper grid. The sample suspension in ethanol was sonicated and a drop was dripped on the support film.

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution experiments were carried out in a closed gas circulation and evacuation system fitted with a top Pyrex window. 50 mg of photocatalyst was dispersed in 100 mL of aqueous solution containing 0.1 M sacrificial reagents. The suspension was irradiated with a 300 W Xe lamp equipped with a 420 nm cutoff filter to provide the visible light irradiations. The temperature of the reaction system was maintained at room temperature by a flow of cooling water during the photocatalytic reaction. The amount of hydrogen evolved was determined with an on-line gas chromatography equipped with a TCD detector.

Results and discussion

ZnIn2S4 was prepared according to our previously reported method, and different amounts of Co(dmgH)2pyCl were loaded on ZnIn2S4 by an impregnation method to obtain Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites. The XRD patterns of all the as-prepared Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites show 2θ peaks at values of 14.3°, 21.2°, 27.7°, 30.4°, 39.3°, 47.5°, 52.1°, 55.8° and 76.4°, which can be assigned to (004), (006), (102), (104), (108), (110), (116), (022) and (123) crystallographic planes of hexagonal ZnIn2S4 phase (JCPDS, no. 03-065-2023) (Fig. 1a). No diffractions peaks corresponding to Co(dmgH)2pyCl are observed in the XRD patterns of the resultant products, but the existence of Co(dmgH)2pyCl in the as-prepared products was confirmed by the FT-IR spectra. Take 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 for example, its IR spectrum shows peaks at 1561 cm−1 and 3120 cm−1, which can be assigned to the asymmetric vibration of C[double bond, length as m-dash]N and –OH in Co(dmgH)2pyCl and indicates the successful incorporation of Co(dmgH)2pyCl in the composite (Fig. S1). XPS analyses on 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite show characteristic binding energy of 781.7 and 796.9 eV for Co3+ 2p. As compared to those observed over pure ZnIn2S4, the peaks of In 3d and S 2p in Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite shift toward lower binding energy, while a higher binding energy shift is observed for Zn 2p (Fig. S2). The SEM and TEM images show that the microspheres of ZnIn2S4, which are composed of ZnIn2S4 nanosheets, were preserved over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites. The HRTEM image shows clear lattice-fringe spacing of 0.32 nm, which can be assigned to the (102) crystal plane of hexagonal phase of ZnIn2S4. The energy dispersed spectrum (EDS) reveals the existence of Co, confirmation of the existence of Co(dmgH)2pyCl in the composite (Fig. S3). As compared with pure ZnIn2S4, a slightly red-shift of its absorption to 600 nm was observed on the UV-vis DRS spectrum of 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite, implying the existence of interaction between ZnIn2S4 and Co(dmgH)2pyCl since neither Co(dmgH)2pyCl nor ZnIn2S4 absorbs in this region (Fig. 1b).
image file: c5ra24390d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of pure ZnIn2S4 and 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite; (b) UV-vis spectra of ZnIn2S4 and 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite. The inset is the UV-vis absorption spectrum of Co(dmgH)2pyCl.

The photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites were first investigated under visible light irradiations using triethanolamine (TEOA) as a sacrificial agent. Similar to that reported previously, pure ZnIn2S4 only showed a low activity for hydrogen evolution, with only 159.6 μmol of hydrogen evolved in 8 h irradiations.9 Although no hydrogen was detected when pure Co(dmgH)2pyCl was irradiated, the incorporation of only a little amount of Co(dmgH)2pyCl into ZnIn2S4 led to a significant improvement of the photocatalytic activity. The hydrogen evolution rate was shown to be 130.6 μmol h−1 over 1.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite, which is about 6.5 times of that over pure ZnIn2S4 under otherwise similar condition. This indicates that Co(dmgH)2pyCl can significantly promote the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over ZnIn2S4.

The loading amount of Co(dmgH)2pyCl also influences the photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution over the Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite. As shown in Fig. 2, the hydrogen evolution rate first increased with the amount of Co(dmgH)2pyCl loaded and an optimum amount of Co(dmgH)2pyCl was found to be 3.0 wt%, which exhibited the highest hydrogen evolution rate of 192.0 μmol h−1. A turnover number of 387 (based on Co(dmgH)2pyCl) was obtained over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite, which is much higher than that reported previously over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/CdS (TON 171).7c However, a further increase in the amount of Co(dmgH)2pyCl resulted in a decrease of the amount of hydrogen evolved. Such a decrease in the photocatalytic activity with a heavy loading of co-catalyst was also observed previously over other co-catalysts like Pt and NiS5c loaded ZnIn2S4. Although cobaloxime does not absorb in the visible light region, a heavy loading of cobaloxime on ZnIn2S4 will have a shading effect since the adsorption of cobaloxime on ZnIn2S4 block the absorption of the incident light by ZnIn2S4.


image file: c5ra24390d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate over (1) pure ZnIn2S4; ZnIn2S4 with different amounts of Co(dmgH)2pyCl (2) 1.0 wt%; (3) 3.0 wt%; (4) 5.0 wt%; (5) 10 wt%; (6) 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 (reaction conditions: catalyst, 0.05 g; 100 mL aqueous solutions containing 0.1 M TEOA).

The time-dependent hydrogen evolution over 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 was shown in Fig. 3 and was compared with that of 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 composite. It was found that 3.0 wt%-Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 showed much higher activity than that of 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 composite. A much smaller amount of hydrogen (592.1 μmol) was evolved over 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 composite in 8 h, as compared with 1438.5 μmol over 3.0 wt%-Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4, indicating that Co(dmgH)2pyCl is a superior co-catalyst for hydrogen evolution over ZnIn2S4 as compared to Pt. Unlike that over 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 composite, there was an induction period at the early stage of irradiations over 3.0 wt%-Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4, during which the hydrogen evolution rate is relatively low. However after one hour irradiation, an almost linear increase of the amount of hydrogen evolution with the irradiation time was observed over 3.0 wt%-Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4, clearly indicating that Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite was stable during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. The stability of Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite during the photocatalytic reaction was also confirmed by the similar XRD patterns of the photocatalyst before and after the reaction (Fig. S4).


image file: c5ra24390d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Time-dependent hydrogen evolution over pure ZnIn2S4, Co(dmgH)2pyCl, 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite and 3.0 wt% Pt/ZnIn2S4 nanocomposite.

The above results clearly indicates that Co(dmgH)2pyCl is a superior cocatalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over ZnIn2S4. A prerequisite for Co(dmgH)2pyCl to act as a co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over ZnIn2S4 is an efficient electron transfer from ZnIn2S4 to Co(dmgH)2pyCl. As previously reported, the conduction band potential of ZnIn2S4 is ca. −1.1 V vs. NHE, while the reduction potentials of CoIII(dmgH)2pyCl are determined to be −0.35 V vs. NHE for CoIII → CoII and −0.78 V vs. NHE for CoII → CoI, respectively.10 Therefore, the calculated Gibbs free energy change ΔG° based on these values suggested that the first and second electron transfer from the excited ZnIn2S4 to Co(dmgH)2pyCl for the conversion from CoIII to CoII as well as the conversion from CoII to CoI are both thermodynamically favorable. However, the existence of an induction period during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite implies that there exists a multiple equilibriums for the reduction of CoIII to form CoII followed by a secondary electron-transfer to reduce CoII to form CoI for the proton reduction to produce hydrogen.11 A similar induction period was also observed previously over Co(dmgH)2pyCl loaded CdSe/ZnS QDs during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.7e


image file: c5ra24390d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite under visible light irradiations.

Based on the above observations and discussion, the mechanism for the promoting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite under visible light irradiation was proposed (Scheme 1). When ZnIn2S4 was irradiated, the photo-generated electrons in the conduction band of ZnIn2S4 transfer to CoIII(dmgH)2pyCl, leading to the formation of [CoII(dmgH)2pyCl] species, which maybe dissociate a Cl ion to form five-coordinate CoII intermediate [CoII(dmgH)2py]. The later species is probably reduced to the corresponding CoI anionic [CoI(dmgH)2py].12 The CoI species are further protonated by reacting with TEOA to form the CoIII hydride, which can be promoted by the presence of base in the reaction environment. The as-formed CoIII hydride can further react with TEOA or water, which may undergo bond cleavage to evolve molecular hydrogen accompanied by the generation of CoII intermediate that can be reduced back to CoI by the excited electrons from ZnIn2S4.13 Sacrificial reagents like TEOA were required as electron donors to quench the photo-generated holes on ZnIn2S4 to complete the whole redox cycle. In addition to playing as a sacrificial agent, TEOA acts also as a hydrogen source during this reaction since controlled experiment using a mixture of TEOA and D2O to carry out this reaction under otherwise similar condition produced both D2 and H2 although the amount of H2 was small as compared with that of D2.

Since sacrificial agents are involved in the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution process, the influence of different sacrificial agents on the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites were also investigated and the results were shown in Fig. 4. Although hydrogen was evolved in the presence of ascorbic acid (AA), lactic acid (LA), triethylamine (TEA) and TEOA as sacrificial agent, the activity over these sacrificial agents was different. The highest activity was achieved over TEOA, while the lowest one was observed over AA. This result can not be simply explained in terms of the different electron donating capability of the sacrificial agents since all the five sacrificial agents used are known to be good electron donators.14 As reported previously, suitable alkaline environment is beneficial for the formation of CoIII-hydride, which is the most crucial intermediate for hydrogen evolution in the cobaloxime-based system. Therefore the photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution in the presence of Na2S/Na2SO3, TEA and TEOA is much higher as compared with that in AA and LA as sacrificial agents. To confirm the effect of alkaline environment on hydrogen evolution rate, controlled experiments using AA and LA as sacrificial agents in alkaline condition (pH = 8) were also carried out. It was found that the rate of hydrogen evolution increased from the original 98.6 μmol h−1 to 103.5 μmol h−1 for AA, while from 106.7 μmol h−1 to 114.8 μmol h−1 for LA. In addition to the alkaline environment, the formation of the CoIII-hydride intermediate also involves the supply and transfer of the hydrogen.15 TEOA is a better hydrogen supplier as compared with TEA and water as in the aqueous solution of Na2S/Na2SO3. Therefore, Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite show the highest photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution in the presence of TEOA as a sacrificial agent.


image file: c5ra24390d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate over 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite in the presence of different electron donors (reaction conditions: catalyst, 0.05 g; 100 mL aqueous solutions containing 0.1 M electron donors).

Conclusion

In summary, Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composites prepared via an impregnating method show efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiations. The highest photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution was observed over 3.0 wt% Co(dmgH)2pyCl/ZnIn2S4 composite, with 1438.5 μmol of hydrogen evolved in 8 h irradiations, which is much higher than that over Pt/ZnIn2S4 under similar reaction conditions. This work demonstrates a highly efficient photocatalytic system for hydrogen evolution under visible light and provides some guidance for the development of cheap noble-metal-free co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen generation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by 973 Program (2014CB239303), NSFC (21273035), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20123514110002) and Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment (No. 2014A03). Z. Li thanks the Award Program for Minjiang Scholar Professorship for financial support.

References

  1. (a) X. Chen, S. Shen, L. Guo and S. S. Mao, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6503 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) X. Li, J. Yu, J. Low, Y. Fang, J. Xiao and X. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 2485 RSC .
  2. (a) A. Fujishima and K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238, 37 CrossRef CAS ; (b) S. Martha, P. C. Sahoo and K. M. Parida, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 61535 RSC ; (c) I. Fujimoto, N. Wang, R. Saito, Y. Miseki, T. Gunji and K. Sayama, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 2454 CrossRef CAS ; (d) W. Luo, Z. Yang, Z. Li, J. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, Z. Wang, S. Yan, T. Yu and Z. Zou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 4046 RSC ; (e) J. Yang, H. Fu, D. Yang, W. Gao, R. Cong and T. Yang, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54, 2467 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (f) X. Zong, H. Yan, G. Wu, G. Ma, F. Wen, L. Wang and C. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7176 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (g) C. Pan, T. Takata, M. Nakabayashi, T. Matsumoto, N. Shibata, Y. Ikuhara and K. Domen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 2955 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (h) X. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen and M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 76 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  3. (a) Z. Lei, W. You, M. Liu, G. Zhou, T. Takata, M. Hara, K. Domen and C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2142 RSC ; (b) Y. Chen, R. Huang, D. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Liu, X. Li and Z. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 2273 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (c) Y. Chen, S. Hu, W. Liu, X. Chen, L. Wu, X. Wang, P. Liu and Z. Li, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 2607 RSC ; (d) L. Ye, J. Fu, Z. Xu, R. Yuan and Z. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 3483 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  4. (a) C. Lu, Y. Chen, Y. Li, C. Ma, H. Zhang, Y. Guo and J. Wang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 54769 RSC ; (b) Y. Li, K. Zhang, S. Peng, G. Lu and S. Li, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2012, 363–364, 354 CrossRef CAS ; (c) Z. Fang, Y. Wang, J. Song, Y. Sun, J. Zhou, R. Xu and H. Duan, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 9830 RSC ; (d) G. Zhang, Z. Zhao, H. Tan, H. Zhao, D. Qu, M. Zheng, W. Yu and Z. Sun, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 21237 RSC ; (e) Y.-S. Chen and P. V. Kamat, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 6075 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (f) Y. Zhang, D. A. J. M. Ligthart, X.-Y. Quek, L. Gao and E. J. M. Hensen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 11537 CrossRef CAS ; (g) C. Gómez-Solís, M. A. Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. Torres-Martínez, I. Juárez-Ramírez and D. Sánchez-Martínez, Fuel, 2014, 130, 221 CrossRef ; (h) T. Takata and K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 19386 CrossRef CAS .
  5. (a) L. Wei, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, H. Wu, R. Yuan and Z. Li, Appl. Catal., B, 2014, 144, 521 CrossRef CAS ; (b) X. Zong, J. Han, G. Ma, H. Yan, G. Wu and C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 12202 CrossRef CAS ; (c) L. Wei, Y. Chen, J. Zhao and Z. Li, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2013, 4, 949 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (d) L. Zhang, B. Tian, F. Chen and J. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 17060 CrossRef CAS ; (e) Y. Zhong, J. Yuan, J. Wen, X. Li, Y. Xu, W. Liu, S. Zhang and Y. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 18260 RSC .
  6. (a) M. Razavet, V. Artero and M. Fontecave, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 4786 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) G. W. Wangila and R. B. Jordan, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2005, 358, 2804 CrossRef CAS .
  7. (a) P. Huang, C. Qin, Z.-M. Su, Y. Xing, X.-L. Wang, K.-Z. Shao, Y.-Q. Lan and E.-B. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 14004 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) Z.-L. Wang, H.-Q. Tan, W.-L. Chen, Y.-G. Li and E.-B. Wang, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 9882 RSC ; (c) F. Wen, J. Yang, X. Zong, B. Ma, D. Wang and C. Li, J. Catal., 2011, 281, 318 CrossRef CAS ; (d) F. Lakadamyali and E. Reisner, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 1695 RSC ; (e) J. Huang, K. L. Mulfort, P. Du and L. X. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 16472 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (f) S.-W. Cao, X.-F. Liu, Y.-P. Yuan, Z.-Y. Zhang, J. Fang, S. C. J. Loo, J. Barber, T. C. Sum and C. Xue, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 18363 RSC .
  8. G. N. Schrauzer, Inorg. Synth., 1968, 11, 61 CrossRef CAS .
  9. Y. Chen, H. Ge, L. Wei, Z. Li, R. Yuan, P. Liu and X. Fu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 1712 CAS .
  10. P. Du, J. Schneider, G. Luo, W. W. Brennessel and R. Eisenberg, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 4952 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  11. J. L. Dempsey, B. S. Brunschwig, J. R. Winkler and H. B. Gray, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1995 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. G. Smolentsev, B. Cecconi, A. Guda, M. Chavarot-Kerlidou, J. A. van Bokhoven, M. Nachtegaal and V. Artero, Chem.–Eur. J., 2015, 21, 15158 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  13. (a) V. Artero, M. Chavarot-Kerlidou and M. Fontecave, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7238 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) D. Basu, S. Mazumder, X. Shi, R. J. Staples, H. B. Schlegel and C. N. Verani, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 1 CrossRef ; (c) X. Hu, B. S. Brunschwig and J. C. Peters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 8988 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  14. (a) X. Liu, D. Sun, R. Yuan, X. Fu and Z. Li, J. Catal., 2013, 304, 1 CrossRef CAS ; (b) X. Zhang, B. Peng, S. Zhang and T. Peng, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 1501 CrossRef CAS ; (c) H. Rao, Z.-Y. Wang, H.-Q. Zheng, X.-B. Wang, C.-M. Pan, Y.-T. Fan and H.-W. Hou, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 2332 RSC ; (d) Y. Fu, D. Sun, Y. Chen, R. Huang, Z. Ding, X. Fu and Z. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 3364 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  15. (a) T. Lazarides, T. McCormick, P. Du, G. Luo, B. Lindley and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9192 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) P. Zhang, M. Wang, X. Li, H. Cui, J. Dong and L. Sun, Sci. China: Chem., 2012, 55, 1274 CrossRef CAS .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details; characterizations; figures of XPS, SEM, TEM, HRTEM, EDS, IR, XRD; table of 1H NMR ESI-MS. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra24390d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.