Paola
Ceroni
a,
Isaia
Laghi
a,
Mauro
Maestri
*a,
Vincenzo
Balzani
a,
Sven
Gestermann
b,
Marius
Gorka
b and
Fritz
Vögtle
*b
aDipartimento di Chimica “G. Ciamician” and Università di Bologna, via Selmi 2, I-40126, Bologna, Italy
bKekulé-Institut für Organische Chemie und Biochemie der Universität Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk Strasse 1, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
First published on 3rd January 2002
We have prepared six dyads containing a fluorescent propyldansylamide (PD) unit covalently linked to nitrobenzene (NB), naphthalene (NA), trans- and cis-azobenzene (tAZ and cAZ), 2,2′-bipyridine (BPY), and [Ru(bpy)3]2+
(RU) moieties. The photochemical, photophysical, and electrochemical properties of the dyads have been investigated in acetonitrile solution. In the PD-NB dyad, the fluorescence of the PD unit is quenched by electron transfer to the NB unit at 298 K, but it is not quenched in a rigid matrix at 77 K. In the PD-NA dyad, the fluorescence of the naphthalene unit is completely quenched by competing energy (80% efficiency) and electron transfer processes. In the case of PD-tAZ, the dansyl fluorescence is quenched without sensitization of the trans
→
cis photoisomerization
reaction of the tAZ moiety, whereas in the PD-cAZ dyad the dansyl fluorescence quenching is accompanied by the sensitisation of the cis
→
trans photoisomerization of the cAZ moiety. In the PD-BPY dyad the fluorescence of the dansyl moiety is sensitized by the BPY unit; upon protonation or Zn2+ complexation of the BPY unit, however, the dansyl fluorescence is quenched by electron transfer. In the PD-RU dyad, the fluorescence of the dansyl unit is quenched by competing energy (25% efficiency) and electron transfer processes, whereas the emission of the RU moiety is unaffected.
In order to better elucidate the excited state behavior of the dansyl chromophoric group, we have synthesized six novel dyads (Scheme 1) made of a propyldansylamide (PD) unit covalently linked to nitrobenzene (NB), naphthalene (NA), trans- and cis-azobenzene (tAZ and cAZ), 2,2′-bipyridine (BPY), and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (RU) moieties and we have examined their photochemical, photophysical and electrochemical properties. Because of the great diversity of the units linked to the common dansyl chromophoric group, a variety of photophysical processes have been observed, such as sensitization of the dansyl fluorescence, quenching of the dansyl fluorescence by electron or energy transfer, and sensitized emission and reaction of the other component of the dyad.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 5-Dimethylaminonaphthalene-N-propyl-1-sulfonamide molecule (PD) and the investigated dyads. | ||
NMR data were obtained on a Bruker AM 400 MHz (1H NMR 400 MHz; 13C NMR 100.6 MHz) spectrometer (as internal reference for 1H and 13C NMR spectra CDCl3 signals were used and calculated for TMS). Mass spectroscopy was performed on MS-30 and MS-50 instruments (A.E.I., Manchester, UK) in EI mode and on a Concept 1H (KRATOS Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) in FAB mode.
°C for 14 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was collected in dichloromethane. After washing with water, aq. Na2CO3 and again with water three times the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4. Further purification was achieved by column chromatography (SiO2, 40–63 µm, dichloromethane) yielding 1.20 g (92%) of a bright yellow solid. M.p.: 95–96
°C. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
0.26 (dichloromethane); 1H-NMR: (400
MHz, C6D6, 25
°C)
δ
=
0.41 [t, 3JHH
=
7.38 Hz, 3 H, N(CH2)2CH3], 0.98 (sext, 3JHH
=
7.28 Hz, 2 H, NCH2CH2CH3), 2.56 (q, 3JHH
=
6.80 Hz, 2 H, NCH2CH2CH3), 4.69 (t, 3JHH
=
6.15 Hz, 1 H, SO2NH), 6.84 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.39 Hz, 4JHH
=
0.74 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.09 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.39 Hz, 3JHH
=
8.62 Hz,
1 H, CHDans), 7.42 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.50 Hz, 3JHH
=
8.74 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.37 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.38 Hz, 4JHH
=
1.23 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.42 (ddd, 3JHH
=
8.62 Hz, 4JHH and 5JHH
=
0.99 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.76 (ddd, 3JHH
=
8.62 Hz, 4JHH
=
0.74 Hz, 5JHH
=
0.99 Hz, 1 H, CHDans); 13C-NMR: (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 25
°C), δ
=
11.1 [(CH2)2CH3],
23.2 (CH2CH2CH3), 45.2 [CH2CH2CH3 and N(CH3)2], 115.6, 120.2, 123.5 (CHDans), 127.7 (CDans), 128.6, 129.8, 130.2 (CHDans), 130.5, 136.5, 152.1 (CDans); EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd: for C15H20N2O2S 292.1245; found: 292.1250 (31, M+), 171.1 (100, [Naph
−
NMe2+H]+), 154.1 (10), 128.0 (9).
°C. 1H-NMR: (250 MHz, CHCl3, 25
°C)
δ
=
4.55 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.40–7.60 (m, 5H, ar. H), 7.85–7.98 (m, 4H, ar. H); 13C-NMR: (62.9 MHz, CHCl3, 25
°C)
δ
=
32.8 (CH2), 122.9 (CH, ar.), 123.2 (CH, ar.), 129.1 (CH, ar.), 129.9 (CH, ar.), 131.2 (CH, ar.), 140.5 (Cq,
ar.), 152.3 (Cq, ar.), 152.5 (Cq, ar.); EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd for C13H11N2Br 274.01; found: 274 (M+,10), 195 ([M
−
Br]+, 13), 90 (Ph+, 45).
°C for 24 h under argon atmosphere. After filtering the undissolved K2CO3 the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was collected in dichloromethane. After washing with water, aq. Na2CO3 and again with water the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4. Further purification was achieved by column chromatography (SiO2, 63–100 µm, chloroform–ethyl acetate 60 : 1), yielding 125 mg (94%)
of an intense orange solid. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
0.22 (chloroform–ethyl acetate 80 : 1); 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C), δ
=
0.66 (t, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.42 (sext, 3JHH
=
7.5 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 2.86 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 3.23 (t, 3JHH
=
7.8 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 4.54 (s, 2 H, NCH2Ar), 7.18 (d, 3JHH
=
7.1 Hz, 1 H, CHDans) 7.31 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 2 H, CHar),
7.44–7.51 (m, 4 H, 1 CHDans, 3 CHar) 7.57 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.6 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.6 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.78 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 2 H, CHar), 7.89 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.2 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.4 Hz, 2 H, CHar), 8.26 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.3 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.1 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.38 (d, 3JHH
=
8.9 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.53 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 1 H, CHDans); 13C-NMR: (100.6 MHz, CDCl3,
25
°C)
δ
=
10.9, 20.8, 45.3 [N(CH3)2], 48.6 (SO2NCH2Ar), 50.3 (SO2NCH2-Ar), 115.0, 119.3, 122.7, 122.8, 123.0, 128.0, 128.8, 128.9, 129.7, 129.8, 129.9, 130.3, 130.9, 134.9, 139.3, 151.6, 151.8, 152.4 (Car); EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd for C28H30N4O2S 486.63; found: 486.2 (85, M+), 171.0 (100, [C10H6N(CH3)2+H]+).
°C for 1 day under argon atmosphere. After filtering the undissolved K2CO3 the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was collected in dichloromethane. After washing with water, aq. Na2CO3 and again with water the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4. Further purification was achieved by column chromatography (SiO2, 40–60 µm, dichloromethane) yielding 130.1 mg (86%) of a bright yellow solid. M.p.:
91–92
°C. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
0.38 (dichloromethane); 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C), δ
=
0.67 (t, 3JHH
=
7.38 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.44 (sext, 3JHH
=
7.48 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 2.90 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 3.23 (t, 3JHH
=
7.63 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 4.63 (s, 2 H, NCH2Naph), 7.23 and 7.25 (d, 3JHH
=
8.86 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.63 Hz, je 1 H, CHNaph and CHDans), 7.44 (dd, 3JHH
=
6.15
and 3.20 Hz, 2 H, CHNaph), 7.51 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.61 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.14 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.51 (s, 1 H, CHNaph), 7.60 (pt, 3JHH
=
8.24 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.63 (dd, 3JHH
=
6.03 Hz and 4JHH
=
3.81 Hz, 1 H, CHNaph), 7.69 (d, 3JHH
=
8.37 Hz, 1 H, CHNaph), 7.77 (dd, 3JHH
=
5.78 Hz and 4JHH
=
3.57 Hz, 1 H, CHNaph), 8.29 (d, 3JHH
=
8.37 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.43 (d, 3JHH
=
8.61
Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.56 (d, 3JHH
=
8.37 Hz, 1 H, CHDans); 13C-NMR: (100.6 MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C), δ
=
11.1, 20.9, 45.5 [N(CH3)2], 48.4, 50.7, 115.3, 119.9, 123.3, 126.0 (CNaph), 126.1 (CNaph), 126.2 (CNaph), 127.2 (CNaph), 127.6 (CNaph), 127.7 (CNaph), 128.1, 128.3 (CNaph), 130.0, 130.1, 130.2, 130.3, 132.8 (CNaph), 133.2 (CNaph), 133.7 (CNaph), 135.3, 151.7; EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd for C26H28N2O2S 432.1871; found: 432.1873 (17, M+), 198.1 (10), 171.1 (100, [C10H6N(CH3)2+H]+),
141.1 (28).
°C for 15 h under argon atmosphere. After filtering the undissolved K2CO3 the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was collected in dichloromethane. After washing with water, aq. Na2CO3 and again with water the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4. Further purification was achieved by column chromatography (SiO2, 60–100 µm, dichloromethane) yielding 65.5 mg (45%) of a green-yellow solid. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
0.26 (dichloromethane); 1H-NMR: (400
MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C), δ
=
0.65 (t, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.36 (sext, 3JHH
=
7.5 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 2.89 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 3.19 (t, 3JHH
=
7.8 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 4.56 (s, 2 H, NCH2C6H5), 7.20 (d, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.34 (d, 3JHH
=
8.8 Hz, 2 H, CHar), 7.50 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz,
1 H, CHDans), 7.56 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.6 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.6 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.05 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 2 H, CHar), 8.22 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.2 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.29 (d, 3JHH
=
8.6 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.55 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 1 H, CHDans); 13C-NMR: (100.6 MHz, CDCl3, 5
°C), δ
=
10.9, 21.0, 45.3 [N(CH3)2], 49.2, 50.2, 115.6, 119.2, 123.1, 123.5 (2 CHar), 128.2, 128.6 (2
CHar), 129.8, 129.9, 130.0, 130.6, 134.6, 144.1 (Car), 147.2 (Car), 151.6; EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd for C22H26N3O4S 427.1566, found: 427.1573 (14, M+), 171.1 (100, [C10H6N(CH3)2+H]+).
°C for 3 days under argon atmosphere. After filtering the undissolved K2CO3 the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was collected in dichloromethane. After washing with water, aq. Na2CO3 and again with water the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure the residue was chromatographed twice (SiO2, 40–60 µm, dichloromethane–methanol 20 : 1 and SiO2,
40–60 µm, petroleum ether (40–60)–methanol–triethylamine 15 : 1 : 1) to yield 50.5 mg (64%) of a bright yellow solid. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
0.20 (dichloromethane–methanol 20 : 1); 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C)
δ
=
0.67 (t, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.42 (sext, 3JHH
=
7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 2.86 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 3.20 (t, 3JHH
=
7.9 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 4.51 (s, 2 H, NCH2Bpy), 7.18 (d, 3JHH
=
7.4
Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.28 (ddd, 3JHH
=
7.5 Hz, 3JHH
=
4.8 Hz, 4JHH
=
1.1 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 7.50 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.56 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.5 Hz and 3JHH
=
7.5 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.58 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.0 Hz and 4JHH
=
2.2 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 7.78 (td, 3JHH
=
7.7 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.8 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy),
8.22 (d, 3JHH
=
7.9 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 8.24 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.2 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.31 (m, 2 H, CHBpy and CHDans), 8.43 (d, 4JHH
=
1.7 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 8.52 (d, 3JHH
=
8.4 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 8.64 (dq, 3JHH
=
4.8 Hz and 4JHH
=
0.8 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy); 13C-NMR: (100.6 MHz, CDCl3, 25
°C), δ
=
11.0, 21.0, 45.3 [N(CH3)2], 48.0, 48.6, 115.2, 119.2, 120.8 (CHBpy),
121.0 (CHBpy), 123.1, 123.8 (CHBpy), 128.2, 129.9, 130.0, 130.1, 130.6, 131.9 (CHBpy), 134.7, 136.9 (CHBpy), 137.0 (CHBpy), 148.8 (CHBpy), 149. (CBpy), 151.8, 155.6 (CBpy), 155.7 (CBpy); EI-MS: m/z
(%): calcd for C26H28N4O2S 460.1933; found: 460.1932 (27, M+), 445.2 (20, [M
−
CH3]+), 431.2 (30, [M
−
C2H5]+), 267.1 (40), 226.1 (65, [M
−
C12H10NO2S]+), 169.1 (33), 101.1 (22), 86.1 (100), 50.1 (41).
°C with decomposition. TLC (SiO2): Rf
=
(acetonitrile–methanol–water–potassium nitrate 40 : 10 : 10 : 1); 1H-NMR: (250 MHz, CD3CN, 25
°C)
δ
=
0.42 (t, 3JHH
=
7.3 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 0.99 (psext, 3JHH
=
7.4 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 2.85 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 2.98 (t, 3JHH
=
7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH2CH3), 4.42 (q, 2JHH
=
16.8
Hz, 2 H, SO2NCH2-Bpy), 7.25 (d, 3JHH
=
7.5 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.39 (t, 3JHH
=
6.1 Hz, 5 H, CHBpy), 7.52 (dd, 3JHH
=
8.1 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.56 (pt, 3JHH
=
8.3 Hz, 1 H, CHDans), 7.73 (m, 5 H, CHBpy), 7.89 (d, 4JHH
=
2.0 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 7.92 (dd, 3JHH
=
7.3 Hz and 4JHH
=
1.5 Hz, 1 H, CHBpy), 8.01–8.13 (br m, 6 H, 5 CHBpy and 1 CHDans), 8.37–8.52 (br m, 8 H, 6 CHBpy and 2 CHDans); 13C-NMR: (100.6
MHz, CD3CN, 25
°C)
δ
=
11.2, 22.6, 46.0, 49.6, 51.7, 116.8, 120.7, 124.8, 125.4, 125.5, 125.6, 128.6, 128.7, 128.8, 129.4, 129.8, 130.6, 130.8, 131.1, 135.9, 138.0, 138.9, 139.0, 139.1, 139.4, 152.2, 152.6, 152.8, 152.9, 57.1, 157.8, 158.0, 158.0, 158.1, 158.2; FAB-MS: m/z
(%): 1019.3 (10, [M
−
PF6]+), 874.2 (10, [M
−
2PF6]+).
=
2.8
×
10−2 in aerated water),10b quinine sulfate (Φ
=
0.55 in aerated water–1N H2SO4 solution)10c or naphthalene (Φ
=
0.23) in deaerated cyclohexane10d as standards. The estimated experimental error is 2 nm on the band maximum, 5% on the molar absorption coefficient, 10% on the fluorescence quantum yield, 5% on the fluorescence lifetime, and 15% on the photoisomerization quantum yield.
In continuous irradiation experiments, light excitation was performed by a medium pressure mercury lamp. Interference filters (Oriel) were used to select a narrow spectral range with λmax
=
313, 365 or 435 nm. The irradiated solution was contained in a 1 cm spectrophotometric cell. The intensity of the incident light (9.1
×
10−8 einstein min−1 at 313 nm, 1.3
×
10−7 einstein min−1 at 365 nm, and 2.4
×
10−6 einstein min−1 at 435 nm) was measured by a ferrioxalate actinometer.11
The concentration of the compounds examined in the photochemical and photophysical experiments was in the range 1–3
×
10−5 M.
1H NMR spectroscopy experiments, related to the cis/trans isomerization of aza compounds, were performed on a Varian Gemini 300 spectrometer at 298 K in ca. 10−3 M CD3CN solution by using TMS as a reference. Photostationary composition and conversion percentages were determined by integration of the signals in the 1H NMR spectra recorded before and after the irradiation.
The electrochemical experiments were carried out in argon-purged DMF or MeCN (Romil Hi-DryTM) solutions at 298, 228 or 219 K (by employing a liquid N2–EtOH low-temperature bath) with an EcoChemie Autolab 30 multipurpose instrument interfaced to a personal computer. In the cyclic voltammetry (CV) the working electrode was a glassy carbon electrode (0.08 cm2, Amel); its surface was routinely polished with a 0.05 µm alumina–water slurry on a felt surface, immediately before use. In all cases, the counter electrode was a Pt spiral, separated from the bulk solution with a fine glass frit, and a silver wire was employed as a quasi-reference electrode (AgQRE). The potentials reported are referred to SCE by measuring the AgQRE potential with respect to ferrocene. The concentration of the compounds examined was of the order of 5
×
10−4 M; 0.05 M tetraethylammonium
hexafluorophosphate (TEAPF6) and tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) were added to MeCN and DMF solutions, respectively, as supporting electrolytes. Cyclic voltammograms were obtained with scan rates in the range 0.05–10 V s−1. The number of electrons exchanged in each process was estimated by comparing the current intensity of the corresponding CV wave with that observed for the monoelectronic oxidation of ferrocene, after correction for differences in the diffusion coefficients.12 The experimental error on the potential values was estimated to be ±10 mV. The CV simulations were carried out by the program Antigona developed by Dr Loic Möttier.13 All the electron transfer processes were considered fast in the simulation and the chemical rate constants were chosen so as to obtain a visual best fit over a 100-fold variation of scan rate.
→
π*
(λmax
=
250 nm) and n
→
π*
(λmax
=
340 nm) transitions and the strong fluorescence band with λmax
=
510 nm (Φ
=
0.30, τ
=
12 ns; Table 1) originates from the singlet nπ* excited state.14 From the onset of the emission band in acetonitrile
at room temperature, the E00 value of the fluorescent excited state is estimated to be 2.8 eV. The fluorescence band moves to higher energy [Fig. 1(a)] in a rigid matrix (λmax
=
466 nm in butyronitrile at 77 K) or on decreasing solvent polarity (λmax
=
450 nm in cyclohexane at 298 K). No phosphorescence is observed, even in a rigid matrix at 77 K. Upon acid titration of the amine group, the low energy nπ* absorption and emission bands disappear with the concomitant appearance of absorption and emission bands at 286 and 330 nm, respectively.7a
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 (a) Full line: absorption and fluorescence spectra in acetonitrile solution at 298 K of 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-N-propyl-1-sulfonamide (PD). The fluorescence spectra in butyronitrile at 77 K (dashed-dotted line) and in cyclohexane at 298 K (dashed line) are also shown. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of PD in acetonitrile–TEAPF6 solution. | ||
=
340 nm, unless otherwise noted)
| 298 Ka | 77 Kb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ max/nm | ϕ em | τ/ns | λ max/nm | τ/ns | |
a In acetonitrile solution.
b In butyronitrile solution.
c Residual emission, lilkely due to an impurity of free dansyl species.
d
λ
ex = 450 nm.
|
|||||
| PD | 510 | 0.30 | 12.0 | 466 | 15.8 |
| PD-NB | 520 | <0.01c | 12.0c | 466 | 12.8 |
| PD-NA | 525 | 0.28 | 12.4 | 464 | 15.3 |
| PD-tAZ | 520 | <0.01c | 12.3c | — | — |
| PD-cAZ | 520 | <0.01c | 12.3c | — | — |
| PD-BPY | 520 | 0.26 | 12.7 | 463 | 14.9 |
| PD-RU | 520 | <0.01c | 12.3c | ||
| 615 | 0.013d | 176 | 580 | 5700 | |
Fig. 1(b) shows the cyclic voltammogram obtained for PD in acetonitrile solution. Beside the peak of the internal ferrocene reference compound, one can observe an oxidation and a reduction process. Both processes are monoelectronic and electrochemically reversible, but chemically irreversible because of reactions involving the oxidized and reduced species. Reversibility increases with increasing scan rate and decreasing temperature. The reduction process becomes fully reversible at 228 K (E1/2
=
−2.02 V, Table 2). In the case of the oxidation process, a simulation procedure13
(according to an EC mechanism) yields E1/2
=
+0.9 V and a value of about 10 s−1 for the rate constant of the reaction involving the oxidized species. The oxidation process
involves the amine nitrogen, as shown by the fact that tertiary aliphatic amines are oxidized at similar potential values15 and by the disappearance of the peak upon addition of acid. The reduction process should involve the naphthalenesulfonamido site of dansyl.
| B | A | I | II | III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Half-wave potentials, unless otherwise noted.
b In acetonitrile solution with TEAPF6 as supporting electrolyte.
c Chemically irreversibile process, Ep value at v = 0.2 V s−1.
d
T = 228 K.
e In dimethylformamide solution with TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte.
f
T = 219 K.
|
|||||
| PDb | +0.90 | −2.02 | |||
| PD-NBb | +0.92c | −1.10 | |||
| +0.90cd | −1.10d | ||||
| PD-NAb | +0.90b | ||||
| PD-tAZb | +0.90c | −1.36 | |||
| +0.92cd | −1.30d | ||||
| PD-cAZb | +0.90c | −1.35 | |||
| −1.28d | |||||
| PD-BPYe | −2.0c | ||||
| +0.94cf | −2.03f | ||||
| PD-RU | +1.31bc | +0.95bc | −1.30e | −1.49ce | |
| −1.37ef | −1.52ef | −1.76ef | |||
The photochemical, photophysical and electrochemical properties of the model compounds of the other components of the dyads will be illustrated when discussing the respective dyad. Most of the photophysical and electrochemical data of the examined compounds are gathered in Tables 1 and 2.
<
0, eqn. (1)] when the energy of the donor excited state is higher than that of the acceptor excited state (the excited state energy is usually expressed by the zero-zero spectroscopic energy, E00)1a:![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
=
260 nm in acetonitrile, no emission band, and a monoelectronic reversible reduction process at −1.08 V in dimethylformamide.15
The absorption spectrum of the PD-NB dyad [Fig. 2(a)] is quite similar to the sum of the spectra of the two components. The fluorescence band of the PD unit, however, is completely quenched at 298 K, whereas it is present in rigid matrix at 77 K (Table 1). The CV curve of the dyad in acetonitrile–TBAPF6 solution [Fig. 2(b)] shows the oxidation process of the dansyl moiety (Epa
=
+0.92 V) and the monoelectronic reversible reduction process at −1.10 V of the nitrobenzene unit (Table 2).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 (a) Absorption (298 K) and emission (77 K) spectra of the PD-NB dyad (full line) and absorption spectra of the PD (dashed line) and nitrobenzene (dashed-dotted line) components in acetonitrile. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of the PD-NB dyad in acetonitrile–TEAPF6 solution. (c) Energy level diagram for the PD-NB dyad in acetonitrile solution at room temperature. | ||
Since the nitrobenzene moiety does not possess energy levels below the fluorescent excited state of dansyl, the quenching of the PD fluorescence observed at 298 K cannot be due to energy transfer. By using the observed potential values and eqn. (2), oxidative electron transfer of the fluorescent excited state of PD results to be exoergonic by ca. 0.9 eV and it can thus account for the observed quenching [Fig. 2(c)]. Interestingly, the quenching process does not occur in a butyronitrile rigid matrix, presumably because the lack of solvent repolarization prevents stabilization of the electron transfer products.17 This is confirmed by the fact that in the low polar cyclohexane solvent the fluorescence quenching is negligible even at 298 K.
=
336 nm in acetonitrile solution (E00
=
4.0 eV),15 an oxidation process at +1.54 V in acetonitrile,15 and a reduction process at −2.49 V in dimethylformamide.15
The absorption spectrum of the PD-NA dyad [Fig. 3(a)] is quite similar to the sum of the spectra of the dansyl and naphthalene components. The fluorescence band of the naphthalene moiety is not present, whereas the fluorescence of the dansyl moiety is unaffected. The CV curve of the dyad [Fig. 3(b)] shows only the dansyl oxidation peak. The oxidation and reduction peaks of the naphthalene moiety cannot be observed because they are outside the accessible potential window in our experimental conditions. On the reasonable assumption that the excited state energy and the electrochemical properties of the NA component of the PD-NA dyad are the same as those of naphthalene, eqn. (1) shows that energy transfer from the fluorescent excited state of the NA moiety to that of the PD moiety is exoergonic (ΔGca. −1.2 eV), and eqn. (2) and (3) show that both the oxidative and reductive electron transfer quenching of the fluorescent excited state of NA by the PD unit are also allowed [ΔGca. −0.4 and −0.6 eV, respectively, Fig. 3(c)].
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 (a) Absorption and emission spectra of the PD-NA dyad (full line) and absorption spectra of the PD (dashed line) and naphthalene (dashed-dotted line) components in acetonitrile. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of the PD-NA dyad in acetonitrile–TEAPF6 solution. (c) Energy level diagram for the PD-NA dyad. | ||
The excitation spectrum of the dyad shows that the light absorbed by the NA component leads to the fluorescence of the PD moiety with 80% efficiency. This result suggests that the quenching of the fluorescent excited state of the naphthalene unit by singlet–singlet energy transfer (which is expected to be very fast via a Förster mechanism because of the strong overlap between the naphthalene emission and the dansyl absorption bands) competes efficiently with electron transfer quenching. An alternative explanation for the observed PD fluorescence sensitization is that quenching takes place only by electron transfer and recombination of the ion-pair product leads to the fluorescent excited state of the dansyl moiety [Fig. 3(c)].
→
π* absorption band with λmax
=
325 nm (ε
=
23
400 cm−1 M−1) and a less intense n
→
π* absorption band with λmax
=
440 nm (ε
=
630 cm−1 M−1). It does not show any emission band, and it undergoes a trans
→
cis photoisomerization with Φ
=
0.20 and 0.24 at 313 and 365 nm, respectively.
c MeAZ shows absorption bands at λmax
=
283 nm (ε
=
4950 cm−1 M−1) and λmax
=
433 nm (ε
=
1500 cm−1 M−1),18 does not exhibit any emission band, and undergoes a cis
→
trans photoisomerization with Φ
=
0.73 at 435 nm.
The absorption spectrum of the PD-tAZ dyad [Fig. 4(a)] is that expected from the sum of the spectra of the PD and tMeAZ components. The emission band of the PD unit with λmax
=
510 nm is completely quenched, and light excitation causes the trans
→
cis photoisomerization with Φ
=
0.15 at 313 nm (where 15% of the light is absorbed by the dansyl unit) and 0.11 at 365 nm (where 50% of the light is absorbed by the dansyl unit). Comparison of these results with those obtained with the PD and tMeAZ model compounds (Table 1) shows that the fluorescent excited state of the PD unit is quenched by the tAZ moiety, and suggests that the light absorbed by the PD unit is not effective (within the uncertainties due
to the large experimental error) for the tAZ photoisomerization reaction.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 (a) Absorption spectra of the PD-tAZ dyad (full line) and the PD (dashed line) and tMeAZ (dashed-dotted line) components in acetonitrile. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of the PD-tAZ (full line) and PD-cAZ (dashed line) dyads in acetonitrile–TEAPF6 solution. (c) Energy level diagram for the PD-tAZ dyad. | ||
The CV curve for the PD-tAZ dyad [Fig. 4(b)] shows the oxidation peak of the PD moiety and a reversible reduction peak at −1.35 V, assigned to the tAZ unit. It follows that the quenching of the fluorescent excited state of the PD moiety by the tAZ moiety via an oxidative electron transfer process [eqn. (2)] is exoergonic [ΔGca. −0.5 eV, Fig. 4(c)]. Therefore, the lack of PD sensitization of the tAZ isomerization could be explained by the occurrence of an electron transfer quenching process faster than energy transfer. A more extensive study of this system, however, has revealed other interesting aspects.
It is well known that the cis-azobenzene species obtained by irradiation of the trans isomers undergo a back cis
→
trans photoisomerization reaction (which also occurs, slowly, in the dark).19 Therefore, continuous irradiation of a trans
(or cis) azobenzene species leads to a photostationary state in which the concentrations of the two isomers depend on the photoisomerization quantum yields and molar absorption coefficients at the excitation wavelength and the rate of back cis
→
trans isomerization:
![]() | (4) |
In the case of MeAZ, the molar fraction of trans isomer present at the photostationary state depends on the excitation wavelength (85% at 435 nm, 5% at 365 nm, and 28% at 313 nm) roughly as expected on the basis of the fraction of light absorbed by each isomer at the different excitation wavelengths. For the PD-tAZ dyad, the photostationary state contains approximately the same molar fraction of trans isomer (ca. 90%) as in the case of MeAZ when excitation is performed at 435 nm, where the PD moiety does not absorb; however, the molar fraction of trans isomer is much larger at 365 (69%) and 313 nm (43%), where the light absorbed by the PD unit is 50 and 15%, respectively. It can also be noted that the molar fraction of trans isomer at the photostationary state for the dyad is larger at 365 than at 313 nm, even if the ratio between the molar absorption
coefficients of the trans and cis isomers is 29 at 365 nm and 9 at 313 nm. These results force us to conclude that in the dyad the light absorbed by the PD moiety is ineffective (or almost so) for the trans
→
cis isomerization, but it does sensitize the reverse cis
→
trans process. From a quantitative viewpoint, we have estimated that the molar fraction of trans isomer at the photostationary state upon 313 or 365 nm excitation in the PD-cAZ dyad is close to that expected in the case of an energy transfer process with unitary efficiency from the PD to the cAZ moiety.20
Since the redox properties of the trans and cis isomers are practically identical (Table 2), it seems unlikely that the quenching of the fluorescence of the PD moiety occurs by electron transfer in the PD-tAZ dyad and by energy transfer in the PD-cAZ one. An alternative, and more likely, explanation is that energy transfer takes place in both PD-tAZ and PD-cAZ, but, because of the shape of the excited state potential energy curve, it leads to excited state geometries that can only deactivate to the trans isomer. The theoretical interpretation of the direct and sensitized photoisomerization of azobenzene has been the object of much debate.19,21 A description of the phenomenon is even more difficult for our dyads since the PD moiety can affect the isomerization process by electronic perturbation as well as by steric constraints.
=
−2.03 V). Such a process occurs at a potential very close to that exhibited by free BPY in dimethylformamide (−2.01
V). On the basis of the electrochemical results, the energy of the PD-to-BPY electron transfer level is around 2.9 eV. This value is smaller than the energy of the singlet excited state of the BPY unit (ca. 4.0 eV),22 but higher than the energy (2.8 eV) of the fluorescent excited state of the PD unit [Fig. 5(c)].
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 (a) Absorption and emission spectra of the PD-BPY dyad (full line) and absorption spectra of the PD (dashed line) and 2,2′-bipyridine (dashed-dotted line) components in acetonitrile. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of the PD-BPY dyad before (full line) and after (dashed line) addition of 5 equiv. of Zn(NO3)2 in dimethylformamide–TBAPF6 solution. (c) Energy level diagram for the PD-BPY dyad. | ||
2,2′-Bipyridine and its derivatives are weakly or not at all fluorescent in fluid solution at 298 K.22 In the emission spectrum of the dyad [Fig. 5(a)], only the dansyl fluorescence band is observed, both in fluid solution at 298 K and in rigid glasses at 77 K. The excitation spectrum shows that energy transfer from the BPY excited states to the fluorescent level of the dansyl unit is at least 80% efficient. Therefore, either the Förster-type energy transfer process is faster than electron transfer, or recombination of the ion-pair obtained by electron transfer leads to the fluorescent excited state of the dansyl moiety [Fig. 5(c)].
Upon addition of Zn2+ to a solution of the PD-BPY dyad, strong changes were observed in the absorption and emission spectra [Fig. 6(a)]. The absorption band of the dansyl moiety (λmax
=
340 nm) was unchanged, whereas the disappearance of the uncoordinated BPY absorption band (λmax
=
285 nm) was accompanied by the appearance of a new band at 310 nm and the disappearance of the dansyl emission (λmax
=
510 nm). The presence of isosbestic points indicates that only one complex species is formed. A plateau was reached after addition of 5 equiv. of Zn2+. The observed spectral changes are assigned to the formation of the PD-BPY(Zn2+) dyad.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 (a) Absorption and emission (inset) spectral changes observed upon addition of Zn2+ (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 5 equiv.) to an acetonitrile solution of the PD-BPY dyad. (b) Energy level diagram for the PD-BPY(Zn2+) dyad. | ||
CV experiments on the PD-BPY dyad in dimethylformamide solution containing 5 equiv. Zn2+ showed that the process occurring at the edge of solvent discharge (vide supra) was no longer observed, and a new reduction process was present at −1.43 V, assigned to the PD-BPY(Zn2+) species [Fig. 5(b)]. In such a dyad, the energy of the PD-to-BPY(Zn2+) electron transfer level should be around 2.3 eV, lower than the energy of the fluorescent excited state of the dansyl unit [Fig. 6(b)], thereby accounting for the observed quenching of the PD fluorescence. In butyronitrile rigid matrix at 77 K, however, no fluorescence quenching was observed, showing again that the energy of the electron transfer level raises above the energy of the fluorescent level of the dansyl moiety.
Upon addition of trifluoroacetic acid to acetonitrile solutions of PD-BPY, absorbance changes were first observed only in the spectral region below 320 nm, whereas the dansyl absorption band with λmax
=
340 nm was practically unaffected. This result shows that protonation first occurs at the BPY moiety, in agreement with the reported pKa of BPY and dansyl containing compounds in water.23 The titration reaction takes place with maintenance of the isosbestic points, is fully reversible, and reaches a plateau after addition of 20 equiv. of acid. The changes in absorbance of the BPY centered band are accompanied by a parallel decrease in the intensity of the dansyl fluorescence. This finding shows that protonated BPY quenches the dansyl fluorescence. Since protonated BPY does not possess excited states below the fluorescent excited state of the dansyl unit, the observed quenching is likely
due to an electron transfer process. The actual reduction potential of protonated BPY cannot be measured because the presence of an excess of trifluoroacetic acid limits the potential window that can be investigated.
Upon further addition of acid, the dansyl absorption band gradually disappears, as expected upon protonation of the dansyl amine moiety.7a
=
620 nm, Φ
=
0.013, τ
=
176 ns) is practically unaffected by the PD moiety. The excitation spectrum in the region between 300 and 400 nm, where the contribution of the dansyl absorption is relatively large [Fig. 7(a)], does not coincide with the absorption spectrum, suggesting that a substantial fraction of the quenching of the dansyl fluorescence is not due to energy transfer to the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ moiety. Careful comparison between the emission intensities of isoabsorptive [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and PD-RU solutions at 340 nm (where in the dyad 40% of the light is absorbed by the PD unit) and 470 nm (where the light is only absorbed by the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ moiety) has shown that only 25% of the quenching of the dansyl fluorescence is due to energy transfer.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 (a) Absorption and emission spectra of the PD-RU dyad (full line) and absorption spectra of the PD (dashed line) and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (dashed-dotted line) components in acetonitrile. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of the PD-RU dyad in acetonitrile–TBAPF6 (anodic region) and dimethylformamide–TBAPF6 (cathodic region) solutions. (c) Energy level diagram for the PD-RU dyad in acetonitrile solution at room temperature. | ||
The CV curve of the dyad [Fig. 7(b)] shows the characteristic dansyl anodic peak at +0.96 V and a reversible one-electron process with E1/2
=
+1.31 V, assigned to the oxidation of the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ unit.24 On the cathodic side, the three expected reduction processes of the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ unit24 are observed. Since the first reduction takes place at −1.30 V, the energy of the PD-to-RU electron transfer process is approximately 2.2 eV, so that electron transfer quenching of the fluorescent excited state of the dansyl unit (2.8 eV) is thermodynamically allowed [Fig. 7(c)] and can account for the large fraction (75%
) of the quenching of the dansyl excited state that is
not due to energy transfer. The formation of the triplet excited state of the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ moiety on excitation of the PD unit via forward and back electron transfer cannot be excluded. A summary of the processes taking place upon excitation of the PD-RU dyad is shown schematically in Fig. 7(c).
443 CrossRef CAS;
(c)
V. Ramamurthy and K. S. Schanze, Organic and Inorganic Photochemistry, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1998–2000, vol. 1–4. Search PubMed.
161;
(b) V. Balzani, P. Ceroni, S. Gestermann, C. Kauffmann, M. Gorka and F. Vögtle, Chem. Commun., 2000, 853 RSC;
(c) F. Vögtle, S. Gestermann, C. Kauffmann, P. Ceroni, V. Vicinelli and V. Balzani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10
398;
(d) V. Balzani, P. Ceroni, S. Gestermann, M. Gorka, C. Kauffmann and F. Vögtle, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000, 3765 RSC;
(e) V. Balzani, P. Ceroni, S. Gestermann, M. Gorka, C. Kauffmann, M. Maestri and F. Vögtle, ChemPhysChem., 2000, 224 CrossRef CAS.Footnote |
| † Dedicated to Professor Alex von Zelewsky on the occasion of his 65th birthday. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2002 |