Issue 22, 2002

Syntheses, characterization and redox properties of homoleptic ruthenium(ii)–diphosphine and diarsine complexes: deviations from ligand additivity

Abstract

Homoleptic Ru(II)–diphosphine and Ru(II)–diarsine complexes, [Ru(L–L)3]2+, have been synthesized by two routes. Treatment of [RuCl2(PPh3)3] with excess ligand in EtOH gave [Ru(L–L)3]Cl2 only for L–L = 1,2-(Me2As)2C6H4 (diars) 1a and Me2PCH2PMe2 (dmpm) 2a. In the latter reaction, neutral trans-[RuCl2(dmpm–P,P′)(dmpm–P)2] 3 was also a product (detected by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy). A more widely-applicable synthesis was treatment of the halide-free starting material [Ru(dmf)6](OTf)3 (dmf = Me2NCHO; OTf = CF3SO3) with excess ligand in EtOH. This gave the triflate salts [Ru(L–L)3](OTf)2 (L–L = diars 1b, dmpm 2b, Me2PCH2CH2PMe2 (dmpe) 4 and Et2PCH2CH2PEt2 (depe) 5. The complexes were characterized by microanalysis, infrared and electronic spectroscopies, multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, and FAB mass spectrometry. The crystal structure of [Ru(diars)3]Cl2·0.5dmf·H2O has been determined. The mean Ru–As bond length, 2.4468(15) Å, is significantly longer than for typical trans-[RuII(diars)2] moieties (2.425 Å; mean of 14 structures), suggesting steric crowding. X-Ray quality crystals of the diphosphine complexes were not obtained. However, Ru K-edge EXAFS measurements on [Ru(dmpe)3](OTf)2 were fitted well by a shell of six phosphorus atoms at Ru–P = 2.38(1) Å, compared with 2.31 Å for published structures containing trans-[RuII(dmpe)2], again indicative of steric crowding. Electrochemical studies, in extremely anhydrous media, revealed an irreversible oxidation for [Ru(L–L)3](OTf)2 assigned as Ru(II)/Ru(III), at EPAca.+2.3 V vs. ferrocene/ferrocinium. Digital simulation showed that the oxidations are kinetically slow, and the formal Ru(II)/Ru(III) potentials are around +1.8 V. This is more positive than the value predicted using published electrochemical ligand parameters (EL). The latter were checked, for diars and dmpe, by synthesizing and measuring the Ru(II)/Ru(III) redox potentials of [Ru(2,2′-bipyridine)2(L–L)](OTf)2 (L–L = dmpe 6 and diars 7). The crystal structure of 7 was determined. The mean Ru–As bond length, 2.4066(3) Å, lends further support to the contention that the homoleptic cation 1 is sterically crowded. Attempts to synthesise pure samples of related complexes with monodentate phosphines (PR3) or aryldiphosphines were unsuccessful.

Graphical abstract: Syntheses, characterization and redox properties of homoleptic ruthenium(ii)–diphosphine and diarsine complexes: deviations from ligand additivity

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
27 Jun 2002
Accepted
10 Sep 2002
First published
16 Oct 2002

J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002, 4095-4104

Syntheses, characterization and redox properties of homoleptic ruthenium(II)–diphosphine and diarsine complexes: deviations from ligand additivity

A. A. La Pensée, J. Bickley, S. J. Higgins, M. Marcaccio, F. Paolucci, S. Roffia and J. M. Charnock, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002, 4095 DOI: 10.1039/B206234H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements