[2+2+2]-Cycloreversion reactions: a theoretical elucidation of thermodynamic and through-bond coupling effects on activation energies †‡

Abstract

[2+2+2]-Cycloreversion reactions of cyclohexane and ten fused cyclohexanes were studied computationally with B3LYP/6-31G* and CASSCF methods. Reactions involving cleavage of bonds in three- and five-membered rings show distinctly lower barriers to cycloreversion than cleavage of four-membered rings. The lower activation energies for the cleavage of odd-membered rings arise from interactions of the sigma framework of the odd-membered ring with the orbitals of the breaking bond. NICS values were calculated to determine the aromaticity of the different rings involved in bond cleavage. In addition to concerted mechanisms, the stepwise diradical pathways for the [2+2+2]-cycloreversions of cyclohexane and cis-tris-cyclopropacyclohexane were studied.

References

1. R. B. Woodward and R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chem., 1969, 81, 797 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1969, 8, 781); The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1970.
2. K. N. Houk, Y. Li and J. D. Evanseck, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 682.
3. (a) W. Spielmann, H.-H. Fick, L.-U. Meyer and A. de Meijere, Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, 45, 4057; (b) C. Rucker, H. Muller-Botticher, W.-D. Braschwitz, H. Prinzbach, U. Reifenstahl and H. Irngartinger, Liebigs Ann./Recueil, 1997, 967; (c) B. Zipperer, K.-H. Muller, B. Gallenkamp, R. Hildebrand, M. Fletschinger, D. Burger, M. Pillat, D. Hunkler, L. Knothe, H. Fritz and H. Prinzbach, Chem. Ber., 1988, 121, 757.
4. M. Maas, M. Lutterbeck, D. Hunkler and H. Prinzbach, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 2143; P. C. Vollhardt and S. Wolff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29, 1151.
5. S. W. Benson, J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 34, 521.
6. (a) B. Zipperer, K.-H. Muller, B. Gallenkamp, R. Hildebrand, M. Fletschinger, D. Burger, M. Pillat, D. Hunkler, L. Knothe, H. Fritz and H. Prinzbach, Chem. Ber., 1988, 121, 757; (b) W.-D. Braschwitz, T. Otten, C. Rucker, H. Fritz and H. Prinzbach, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 1348; (c) R. Schwesinger, M. Breuninger, B. Gallenkamp, K.-H. Muller, D. Hunkler and H. Prinzbach, Chem. Ber., 1980, 113, 3127; (d) E. Vogel, H.-J. Altenbach and D. Cremer, Angew. Chem., 1973, 85, 862 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1973, 12, 838); (e) H. Prinzbach, H.-P. Bohm, S. Kagabu, V. Wessely and H. V. Rivera, Tetrahedron Lett., 1978, 1243; (f) H.-P. Bohm, Dissertation, University of Freiburg, 1978; (g) H. Prinzbach and D. Stusche, Angew. Chem., 1970, 82, 836; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1970, 9, 799; (h) H. Prinzbach, D. Stusche, M. Breuninger and J. Markert, Chem. Ber., 1976, 109, 2823; (i) H. Prinzbach, D. Stusche, J. Markert and H.-H. Limbach, Chem. Ber., 1976, 109, 3505.
7. D. Kaufman, H.-H. Fick, O. Schallner, W. Spielmann, L.-U. Meyer, P. Golitz and A. de Meijere, Chem. Ber., 1983, 116, 587.
8. (a) W. Spielmann, W. Kaufmann and A. de Meijere, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1978, 17, 440; (b) P. Binger and J. McMeeking, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1975, 14, 371; (c) E. Vogel, H.-J. Altenbach and C.-D. Sommerfeld, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1972, 11, 939.
9. H. Prinzbach, H.-P. Schal and D. Hunkler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1980, 19, 567; H. Prinzbach, M. Maas, H. Fritz and G. McMullen, Tetrahedron Lett., 1980, 21, 4897.
10. K. N. Houk, R. W. Gandour, R. W. Strozier, N. G. Rondan and L. A. Paquette, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 6797.
11. R. D. Bach, G. J. Wolber and H. B. Schlegel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 2837.
12. A. Ioffe and S. Shaik, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1992, 2101.
13. H. Jiao and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1998, 11, 655.
14. S. P. Verevkin, H.-D. Beckhaus, C. Rüchardt, R. Haag, S. I. Kozhushkov, T. Zywietz, A. de Meijere, H. Jiao and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11130.
15. J. Spanget-Larsen and R. Gleiter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1978, 17, 441.
16. D. Sawicka, S. Wilsey and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 864.
17. GAUSSIAN94 (Revision B2)M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. A. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, W. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
18. Experimental heat of reaction based on heats of formation from NIST data for (a) cyclohexane and (b) enthlene: (a) E. J. Prosen, W. H. Johnson and F. D. Rossini, J. Res. NBS, 1946, 37, 51; (b) M. W. Chase Jr., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph 9, 1998, 1.
19. P. v. R. Schleyer, C. Maerker, A. Dransfield, H. Jiao and N. J. R. Hommess, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 6317; H. Jiao, R. Nagelkerke, H. A. Kurtz, R. Vaughan Williams, W. T. Borden and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 5921.
20. Many product conformations are possible for the bis fused cyclohexanes and we have tried to locate the lowest energy minima of all product conformers to use in determining the â–²G_rxn(see Figure 13a, supplementary data).
21. A reference has proposed that a Marcus treatment (R. A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem., 1968, 72, 891 see also S. S. Shaik, H. B. Schlegel and S. Wolfe, Theoretical Aspects of Physical Organic Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1992, pp. 34–44) of the data would be more appropriate than a linear relationship. The simplest form of the Marcus equation: ΔG‡=ΔG_o‡+ 1/2ΔG_rxn+ΔG_rxn 2 / 16ΔG_o‡ is based upon the assumption that the potential surface consists of intersecting parabolas. A slope of 1/2 is enforced by this equation at and near ΔG_rxn= 0. However, this treatment is known to be inappropriate for reactions that have no real identity reaction (C. D. Ritchie, C. Kubistry and G. Y. Ting, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 279) since the potential curves are not identical for reactant and product. Furthermore, setting ΔG_o‡ to the value of ΔG‡ calculated when ΔG_rxn= 0 for the reactions in this paper gives a nearly linear relationship with slope =1/2, and one which essentially none of the data points fit; the deviations of activation energies from this correlation now follow no obvious pattern.
22. C. Sandorfy and R. Daudel, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. C, 1954, 238, 93.
23. (a) R. C. Haddon, Tetrahedron Lett., 1974, 33, 2797; (b) R. C. Haddon, Tetrahedron Lett., 1974, 49, 4303.
24. R. Hoffmann, A. Imamura and W. Hehre, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 1499.
25. (a) J. W. Verhoeven, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1980, 99, 369; (b) J. W. Verhoeven, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1980, 99, 143.
26. (a) E. Heilbronner and A. Schwesinger, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1975, 58, 936; (b) H. D. Martin and A. Schwesinger, Chem. Ber., 1974, 107, 3143; (c) R. Hoffmann, Acc. Chem. Res., 1971, 4, 1; (d) R. Gleiter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1974, 13, 696; (e) P. Pasman, J. Verhoeven and Th. J. de Boer, Tetrahedron Lett., 1977, 207; (f) R. C. Cookson, J. Henstock and J. Hudec, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88, 1060.
27. C. A. Grob, Angew. Chem., 1969, 81, 343.
28. (a) M. N. Paddon-Row and R. Hartcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 662; (b) M. N. Paddon-Row and R. Hartcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 671.
29. S. M. Van der Kerk, J. W. Verhoeven and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1985, 1355.
30. (a) E. W. Schlag and B. S. Rabinovitch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 5996; Y. Jean, L. Salen, J. S. Wright, J. A. Horsley, C. Moser and R. M. Stevens, Pure Appl. Chem., Supp. (23rd Congr.), 1971, 1, 197; (b) C. T. Genaux, F. Kern and W. D. Walters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1953, 75, 6196.
31. (a) N. W. Moriarty, R. Lindh and G. Karlstrom, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 289, 442; (b) F. Bernardi, A. Bottoni, M. Olivucci, A. Venturini and M. A. Robb, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1994, 90, 1617; (c) C. Doubleday, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 11968; (d) K. N. Houk, B. Beno, M. Nendel, K. Black, H. Y. Yoo, S. Wilsey and J. K. Lee, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 1997, 398, 169.