Spin isomerisation of para-substituted phenyl cations

Abstract

The singlet and triplet potential energy surfaces of a series of p-X-substituted aryl cations (X = H, CN, CH₃, F, OH, NH₂) are investigated computationally at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. The first four species are found to be ground state singlets, the last has a triplet ground state, and the spin states of the OH derivative are almost isoenergetic. The minimum energy crossing points (MECPs) between the two surfaces are found to lie very little above the higher of the two minima in all cases, and the spin-orbit coupling is significant at those points. Therefore, it is expected that aryl cations will rapidly convert to their most stable spin state, and that in cases of near degeneracy such as for p-HO-C₆H₄⁺, the states may interconvert rapidly enough to both be accessible in thermal reactions.

References

1. For several reviews on aryl cations, see Z. Rappaport and P. J. Stang, eds., Dicoordinate Carbocations, Wiley, 1997.
2. For recent studies and applications of this reaction see (a) L. S. Romsted, J. Zhang and L. Zhuang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10046; (b) C. Bravo-Diaz, M. Soengas-Fernandez, M. J. Rodriguez-Sarabia and E. Gonzalez-Romero, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 5098; (c) R. Glaser, C. J. Horan and H. Zollinger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2210; (d) D. Ferraris, C. Cox, R. Anand and T. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 4319.
3. (a) J. Hrusák, D. Schröder, T. Weiske and H. Schwarz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 2015 and references therein; (b) M. Speranza, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2933.
4. There are of course other low-lying electronic states for the phenyl cation, in particular a biradical state identical to the triplet discussed here, but in which the two unpaired electrons are singlet rather than triplet paired. The geometry and energy of this state, as well as of other excited states not discussed in the present paper, have been computed in ref. 6a,b, were found to lie higher in energy than the two states considered here and were therefore neglected in discussing the chemistry and spectroscopy of the phenyl cation. Accordingly, we have assumed that the chemistry of the substituted phenyl cations is likewise dominated by the lowest singlet and triplet states and we have not considered other states.
5. The existence of the triplet state was Wrst suggested in R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 3351.
6. (a) J. Hrusák, D. Schröder and S. Iwata, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 7541; (b) A. Nicolaides, D. M. Smith, F. Jensen and L. Radom, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 8083 For previous results concerning the splitting of the two states, see references included in these two papers.
7. (a) H. B. Ambroz, T. J. Kemp and G. K. Przybytniak, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 1997, 108, 149; (b) H. B. Ambroz, T. J. Kemp and G. K. Przybytniak, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 1992, 68, 85; (c) H. B. Ambroz and T. J. Kemp, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1982, 172; (d) H. B. Ambroz and T. J. Kemp, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1979, 8, 353; (e) A. Cox, T. J. Kemp, D. R. Payne, M. C. R. Simons and P. Pinot de Moira, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 4779.
8. J. D. Dill, P. v. R. Schleyer and J. A. Pople, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 1 For other computational studies of substituted aryl cations, see e.g. F. Grandinetti and M. Speranza, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 229, 581 and ref. 10.
9. See for example, J. A. Berson, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997, 30, 238; J. Hu, B. T. Hill and R. R. Squires, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11699; Z. Zhu, T. Bally, L. L. Stracener and R. J. McMahon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 2863; Y. Wang, T. Yuzawa, H. Hamaguchi and J. P. Toscano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 2875; J.-L. Wang, I. Likhotvorik and M. S. Platz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 2883.
10. For gas-phase reactions of substituted aryl cations see A. Filippi, G. Lilla, G. Occhiucci, C. Sparapani, O. Ursini and M. Speranza, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 1250.
11. J. N. Harvey, M. Aschi, H. Schwarz and W. Koch, Theor. Chem. Acc., 1998, 99, 95.
12. For reviews on non-adiabatic chemistry and recent computational studies see e.g. (a) F. Bernardi, M. Olivucci and M. A. Robb, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1996, 321; (b) D. R. Yarkony, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 511; (c) S. Grimme, M. Woeller, S. D. Peyerimhoff, D. Danovich and S. Shaik, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 287, 601; (d) M. Garavelli, F. Bernardi, M. Olivucci, T. Vreven, S. Klein, P. Celani and M. A. Robb, Faraday Discuss., 1998, 110, 51; (e) K. Morokuma, Q. Cui and Z. Liu, Faraday Discuss., 1998, 110, 71; (f) J. E. Stevens, Q. Cui and K. Morokuma, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 1544; (g) D. R. Yarkony, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 5305; (h) M. Riad Manaa and C. F. Chabalowski, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1999, 300, 619.
13. (a) J. N. Harvey, D. Schröder and H. Schwarz, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 1997, 106, 447; (b) C. A. Schalley, J. N. Harvey, D. Schröder and H. Schwarz, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 1021; (c) M. Aschi, J. N. Harvey, C. A. Schalley, D. Schröder and H. Schwarz, Chem. Commun., 1998, 531; (d) C. A. Schalley, S. Blanksby, J. N. Harvey, D. Schröder, W. Zummack, J. H. Bowie and H. Schwarz, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 1, 987; (e) M. Aschi, F. Grandinetti and V. Vinciguerra, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 2366; (f) D. Schröder, C. Heinemann, H. Schwarz, J. N. Harvey, S. Dua, S. J. Blanksby and J. H. Bowie, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 2550.
14. We have employed the B3LYP hybrid functional as implemented in the Gaussian 94 suite of programs, which is slightly diVerent from the original as described in A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 1372.
15. For other methods to locate MECPs, see (a) N. Koga and K. Morokuma, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1985, 119, 371; (b) D. R. Yarkony, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 4407; (c) M. J. Bearpark, M. A. Robb and H. B. Schlegel, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 223, 269.
16. W. H. Miller, N. C. Handy and J. E. Handy, J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72, 99.
17. Gaussian 94, Revision E.2, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1995.
18. Gamess-USA (version of 18th March 1997) M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. J. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis and J. A. Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem., 1993, 14, 1347.
19. (a) S. Koseki, M. W. Schmidt and M. S. Gordon, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 10768; (b) S. Koseki, M. S. Gordon, M. W. Schmidt and N. Matsunaga, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 12764.