Interactions between aminocalixarenes and nucleotides or nucleic acids †

Abstract

Four calixarenes with (trimethylammonium)methyl groups at the phenyl rings in the upper rim were prepared. Association constants K with mononucleotides were determined in D₂O by NMR shift titration, partially also by fluorescence competition titration using ANS as dye. The complexation free energies ΔG obtained with the derivatives of the calix[4]cone (AC4c) and the calix[4]-1,3-alternate (AC4a) conformation were similar, but increased from AMP (18 ± 1 kJ mol^–1) to ADP (20 ± 1 kJ mol^–1), to ATP (22 ± 1 kJ mol^–1). With the calix[6] derivative (AC6) the corresponding values were 22, 24, 27 kJ mol^–1, with the calix[8] host (AC8) 24, 26, 28 kJ mol^–1, respectively. The large contribution of salt bridging to the complexation was obvious from the ΔG difference between adenosine and e.g. AMP (with the calix[4]cone derivative 5.6 and 17.7 kJ mol^–1, respectively). Affinity differences between different nucleobases increased moderately with the size of the macrocyclic host, e.g. ΔΔG between AMP and TMP was 1 kJ mol^–1 with calix[4]cone, 2 kJ mol^–1 with calix[6], and 3 kJ mol^–1 with calix[8] compounds. The results are in line with computer simulated complex structures in which the nucleobase or sugar parts are only partially inserted into the calix cavity. This agrees with the observed complexation induced NMR shifts (CIS), which are small but increase with the ring size of the host. Noticeably the CIS values are substantially larger for much weaker bound nucleosides.

Affinities of the four aminocalixarenes with double-stranded calf thymus (CT) DNA, with polydA*polydT and with polydG*polydC were characterized by ΔT_m of the double-strand denaturation temperature and by fluorimetric assays using ethidium bromide (C₅₀ values). The calix[4]cone derivative AC4c shows, due to the four positive charges converging at one side, the strongest effects. They surpass spermine although this also bears four protonated ammonium groups, indicating additional binding contributions from the phenyl moieties. The larger, more flexible calix[6]- and calix[8]-derivatives AC6 and AC8 show only small affinity increases in spite of their 6 or 8 positive charges. Preliminary molecular modeling studies indicate that based on the distances between the ammonium centers only partial contact of all centers to the groove phosphates can materialize. The ligands AC4c, AC4a and AC6 exhibit a remarkable preference for DNA in comparison to RNA mimics.

References

1. C. Seel, A. Galan and J. de Mendoza, Top. Curr. Chem., 1995, 175, 101.
2. (a) S. Claude, J.-M. Lehn, F. Schmidt and J.-P. Vigneron, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, 1182; (b) M. Dhaenens, J.-M. Lehn and J.-P. Vigneron, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 1379.
3. P. Cudic, M. Zinic, V. Tomisic, V. Simeon, J.-P. Vigneron and J.-M. Lehn, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 1073.
4. (a) H. Fenniri, M. W. Hosseini and J.-M. Lehn, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 786 and references therein; (b) W. M. Hosseini, A. J. Blacker and J.-M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 3896.
5. J. A. Aguilar, E. Garcia-Espana, J. A. Guerrero, S. V. Luis, J. M. Llinares, J. F. Miravet, J. A. Ramirez and C. Soriano, J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2237.
6. M. C. Rotger, J. F. Gonzalez, P. Ballester, P. M. Deya and A. Costa, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 4501.
7. F. M. Menger and K. K. Catlin, Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 2330.
8. S. M. Lacy, D. M. Rudkevich, W. Verboom and D. N. Reinhoudt, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 5953.
9. V. Kral, A. Andrievsky and J. L. Sessler, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2349.
10. J. E. Kickham, S. J. Leob and S. L. Murphy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 7031.
11. (a) and , ., , , (, , , ); H.-J. Schneider and I. Theis, Angew. Chem, 1989, 101, 757, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 753; (b) H.-J. Schneider, T. Blatter, B. Palm, U. Pfingstag, V. Rüdiger and I. Theis, J. Am. Soc. Chem., 1992, 114, 7704; (c) A. V. Eliseev and H.-J. Schneider, J. Am. Soc. Chem., 1994, 116, 6081; (d) K. G. Ragunathan and H.-J. Schneider, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 2597 and references cited therein.
12. (a) W. D. Wilson, Nucleic Acids in Chemistry and Biology, Eds. G. M. Blackburn and M. J. Gait, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996, p. 329 ff; (b) D. S. Johnson and D. L. Boger, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 4, Ed. Y. Murakami, Pergamon, 1996; (c) J. W. Lown, Anti-Cancer Drug Des., 1988, 3, 25; (d) S. Neidle and T. C. Jenkins, Mol. Des. Model., Concepts Appl. Part B, 1991, 203, 433.
13. J. Mountzouris and L. HurleySmall-Molecule-DNA Interaction Bioorganic Chemistry: Nucleic Acids, Ed. S. Hecht, Oxford University Press, ch. 10, 1996.
14. (a) C. D. Gutsche, Calixarenes, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1989; (b) A. Pochini, R. Ungaro, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 2, p. 103, Eds. F. Vögtle and J.-M. Lehn, 1996; (c) A. Ikeda and S. Shinkai, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1713; (d) J. Vicent and V. Böhmer, (Eds.)Calixarenes, KluwerDordrecht, 1990.
15. T. Nagassaki, K. Sisido, T. Arimura and S. Shinkai, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 797.
16. M. Almi, A. Arduini, A. Casnati, A. Pochini and R. Ungaro, Tetrahedron, 1989, 45, 2177.
17. G. Arena, A. Casnati, A. Contino, D. Sciotto and R. Ungaro, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 4685.
18. F. Arnaud-Neu, S. Fuangswasdi, A. Notti, S. Pappalardo and M. F. Parisi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 112.
19. Y. Shi and H.-J. Schneider, unpublished results.
20. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987p. 175 f.
21. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 1983, 4, 187; L. Brooks and M. Karplus, Methods Enzymol., 1986, 127, 369; A. T. Brünger and M. Karplus, Acc. Chem. Res., 1991, 24, 54.
22. H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1994, 22, 227.
23. (a) K. D. Stewart and T. A. Gray, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1992, 5, 461; (b) H.-J. Schneider and T. Blatter, Angew. Chem., 1992, 104, 1244; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 1207.
24. A. Hossain and H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5, 1284.
25. (a) M. Fernandez-Saiz, H.-J. Schneider, J. Sartorius and W. D. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4739; (b) Ke Li, M. Fernandez-Saiz, C. T. Rigl, A. Kumar, K. G. Ragunathan, A. W. C. McConnaughie, D. W. Boykin, H.-J. Schneider and W. D. Wilson, Bioorg. Med. Chem.; Symp. Issue, Strategies for RNA Recognition, Ed. S. Hecht, 1997.
26. (a) S. Chandrasekaran, S. Kusuma, D. W. Boykin and W. D. Wilson, Magn. Reson. Chem., 1986, 24, 630; (b) J. Sartorius and H.-J. Schneider, FEBS Lett., 1995, 374, 387.