A theoretical approach to understanding the fragmentation reaction of halonitrobenzene radical anions †

Abstract

We present a semiempirical AM1 study of the radical anions of o-, m- and p-halonitrobenzenes and some alkyl substituted derivatives in relation to their σ–π orbital isomerism and the energy of their interconversion (ΔE_σπ). Halobenzene radical anions are also included for comparison. The results obtained with the RHF/CI(5) formalism account for the differences observed in the fragmentation rate of these radical anions under thermal and photochemical conditions. Based on the calculated ΔE_σπ the intramolecular thermal electron transfer from the π system to the σ* C–X bond involved in the fragmentation of the intermediates into an aromatic radical and the anion of the leaving group occurs with considerable energy for the p-, m- and o-chloronitrobenzenes (1a–c) and the p- and m-bromo (2a, b) derivatives. The fragmentation of these radical anions is favoured either from the first or from higher energy excited doublet states. On the other hand, the intramolecular thermal electron transfer is favoured for the p-, m-, o-iodo (3a–c) and o-bromo (2c) derivatives. The results obtained for some alkyl substituted halonitrobenzene radical anions are in agreement with their known experimental fragmentation rates.

References

1. (a) E. M. Arnett and R. A. Flowers, II, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1993, 22, 9; (b) X.-M. Zhang, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 2275; (c) K. Daasbjerg, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 1275; (d) T. Clark, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 1672.
2. J. M. Savéant, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1990, 26, 1.
3. For example see: (a) W. C. Danen, T. T. Kensler, J. G. Lawless, M. F. Marcus and M. D. Hawley, J. Phys. Chem., 1969, 73, 4389; (b) D. Behar and P. Neta, J. Phys. Chem., 1981, 85, 690; (c) P. Neta and D. Behar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 103; (d) M. Meot-Ner, P. Neta, R. K. Norris and K. Wilson, J. Phys. Chem., 1986, 90, 168.
4. D. Bethell, R. G. Compton and R. G. Welling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1992, 147.
5. R. G. Compton, R. A. W. Dryfe and A. C. Fisher, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1993, 361, 275.
6. R. G. Compton, R. A. W. Dryfe and A. C. Fisher, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 1581.
7. R. G. Compton and R. A. W. Dryfe, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1994, 375, 247.
8. R. G. Compton, R. A. W. Dryfe, J. C. Eklund, S. D. Page, J. Hirst, L. B. Nei, G. W. J. Fleet, K. Y. Hsia, D. Bethell and L. Martingale, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 1673.
9. Orbital isomers are defined as species distinguishable by different occupation of a set of available MOs. The MOs may be distinguished by symmetry, or by their nodal properties. See: M. J. S. Dewar, S. Kirschner and H. W. Kollmar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 5242.
10. (a) D. D. Clarke and C. A. Coulson, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1969, 169; (b) R. Dressler, M. Allan and E. Haselbach, Chimia, 1985, 39, 385.
11. M. C. R. Symons, Acta Chem. Scand., 1997, 51, 127; M. C. R. Symons, Pure Appl. Chem., 1981, 53, 223.
12. (a) M. J. S. Dewar and K. Narayanaswami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 2422; (b) M. J. S. Dewar, A. H. Pakiari and A. B. Pierini, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 3242.
13. See: L. Salem, Electrons in Chemical Reactions: First Principles, Wiley, New York, 1982.
14. (a) H. Villar, E. A. Castro and R. A. Rossi, Can. J. Chem., 1982, 60, 2525; (b) H. Villar, E. A. Castro and R. A. Rossi, Z. Naturforsch., Teil A, 1984, 39, 49; (c) J. Casado, I. Gallardo and M. Moreno, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1987, 219, 197; (d) A. B. Pierini, J. S. Duca, Jr. and M. T. Baumgartner, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 1994, 311, 343; (e) C. Glidewell, Chem. Scr., 1985, 25, 142; (f) C. P. Andrieux, J. M. Savéant and D. Zann, Nouv. J. Chim., 1984, 8, 107; (g) R. Benassi, C. Bertarini and F. Taddei, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1996, 257, 633.
15. A. B. Pierini and J. S. Duca, Jr., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 1821.
16. C. Amatore, C. Combellas, J. Pinson, M. A. Oturan, S. Robveille, J.-M. Saveánt and A. Thiébault, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 4846.
17. D. A. Liotard, E. F. Healy, J. M. Ruiz and M. J. S. Dewar, AMPAC version 2.1, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, program 506, QCPE Bull., 1989, 9, 123.
18. J. W. McIver and A. Komornicki, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1971, 10, 303; J. W. McIver and A. Komornicki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 265.
19. G. Rauhut and T. Clark, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1994, 90, 1783.
20. E. A. Halevi and M. Wolfsberg, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 1493.
21. M. J. S. Dewar and E. G. Zoebisch, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 1988, 180, 1.
22. The σ surface of chlorobenzene RA has been proposed as repulsive at all C–Cl separation distances but infinity. See ref. 10a.
23. This type of effect was also observed for the neutral molecules. In the absence of steric effects, the molecules have weakly restricted NO₂ rotation about the C–N axis. We found AM1/RHF barriers of 7.57 kJ mol^–1 for p-bromonitrobenzene and 8.7 kJ mol^–1 for p-chloronitrobenzene. This is reasonable considering the values observed and calculated for nitrobenzene. See for example: J. P. Ritchie, Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 7465.
24. This correlation was assumed within the Marcus theory even though the ΔE_σπ was not corrected to take into consideration the “effective intra-ET distance”(see ref. 15).
25. V. D. Parker, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B, 1981, 35, 655.
26. R. G. Compton, R. G. Wellington, P. J. Dobson and P. A. Leigh, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1994, 370, 129.
27. W. C. Danen, T. T. Kensler, J. G. Lawless, M. F. Marcus and M. D. Hawley, J. Phys. Chem., 1969, 73, 4389.
28. T. Teherani and A. J. Bard, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B, 1983, 37, 413.